2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey
description
Transcript of 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey
![Page 1: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
2009 Danville RegionSocial Capital Survey2009 Danville RegionSocial Capital Survey
Center for Survey ResearchA Unit of the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service
University of Virginia
Center for Survey ResearchA Unit of the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service
University of Virginia
October 20, 2009
![Page 2: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
2
Report AuthorsReport Authors
Deborah L. RexrodeStaff Research Analyst
Thomas M. GuterbockDirector
Center for Survey Research
![Page 3: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
3
Purpose of SurveyPurpose of Survey
• To measure how people feel about the region and their future in it
• To measure people’s attachment to their community
• To measure the region’s social capital• To gather baseline data to be compared to results
of future, bi-annual surveys
![Page 4: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
4
Survey FeaturesSurvey Features• SPONSOR: Danville Regional Foundation
• n = 1,026
• Samples
• 3 geographic areas: City of Danville, Pittsylvania County, and Caswell County, NC
• Respondent selection within household
• CATI (Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing)
• Solid interviewer training and pretest
{RDD (random digit dialing) Listed Cell-Phone
![Page 5: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
5
Survey AccuracySurvey Accuracy
• Margin of error: +/- 3.7%• Data weighted on gender, geographic
region, home ownership, and race.
![Page 6: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
6
Age of Respondents by Phone Type
Age of Respondents by Phone Type
Reaching respondents by cell phone provides better coverage of young people, unmarried, renters, minorities, newcomers.
35.4%
35.7%
16.6%
9.0%
3.4%
11.0%
24.6%
24.6%
22.0%
17.8%
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
Over 64
50-64
38-49
26-37
18-25
Landline Cell
![Page 7: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
7
Survey TopicsSurvey Topics
• Overall quality of life in the Danville Region• Community Attachment• Civic Participation• Political Participation• People in the Economy• Children and Schools• Health Issues
![Page 8: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
8
National, Regional, State andLocal Comparisons
National, Regional, State andLocal Comparisons
• An attempt was made in the design of this study to use comparable measures with other county, regional, state, and national studies.
• There is no single source of information to use in comparing these survey results with broader results.
• The report reflects some individual item comparisons where possible.
![Page 9: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
9
Demographic ProfileDemographic Profile
![Page 10: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
10
Geographic DistributionGeographic Distribution
9.5%
39.7%
50.8%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Caswell Co
City ofDanville
PittsylvaniaCo
![Page 11: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
11
Age of RespondentsAge of Respondents
8.9%
13.7%
18.9%
33.3%
25.1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
18-25
26-37
38-49
50-64
65+
![Page 12: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
12
EducationEducation
High School
Graduate29.2%
Some high
School16.7%
Ph.D.1.1%
Graduate Work8.2%4-Year
Degree11.3%
Some College33.6%
![Page 13: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
13
Survey HighlightsSurvey Highlights
• Danville area residents rate their region fairly high for quality of life
• Danville area residents have a strong sense of community, social connectedness and religious involvement
• However, civic involvement lags somewhat behind averages elsewhere
• Many Danville area residents worry about their children’s future
![Page 14: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
14
What is “Social Capital”What is “Social Capital”“By ‘social capital,’ I mean features of social life –
networks, norms, and trust – that enable participants to act together more effectively to pursue shared objectives.”
--Robert Putnam
“Social capital refers to our relations with one another…I use the term ‘civic engagement’ to refer to people’s connections with the life of their communities, not merely with politics.”
--James S. Coleman
![Page 15: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
15
Quality of LifeQuality of Life
. . . and wanting to live
in the Danville Region
![Page 16: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
16
Quality of LifeQuality of Life• Rated on a ten-point scale (10 = highest)
• Danville Region rating: 7.30
– Albemarle County (2008): 8.01
– Spotsylvania County (2007): 7.39
– Bedford County (2001) 7.80
– Prince William County (2009) 7.30
![Page 17: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
17
Overall Quality of Life RatingsOverall Quality of Life Ratings
Middle27.1%
Best53.0%
Worst19.9%
Best (8-10) Middle (6-7) Worst (1-5)
![Page 18: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
18
Overall Quality of Life Ratings by Geographic Region
Overall Quality of Life Ratings by Geographic Region
6.57
7.78
7.81
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Danville
PittsylvaniaCo
Caswell Co,NC
Mean
![Page 19: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
19
Quality of LifeQuality of Life
• Overall rating of quality of life in the Danville Region of 7.30 is relatively high
• Residents of Pittsylvania County, VA and Caswell County, North Carolina rate the quality of life higher than those who live in Danville city.
• Long-time residents are concerned about the quality of life in the Danville Region in the future
![Page 20: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
20
Community AttachmentCommunity Attachment
![Page 21: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
21
Neighbors You KnowNeighbors You Know
17%
22%
12%
4%
24.4%
21.1%
9.9%
5.9%
45%
38.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
11 or more
6 to 10
3 to 5
1 or 2
None
AARP Danville
![Page 22: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
22
Safety at Home and in SchoolsSafety at Home and in Schools
98.3% 86.9%
1.6%
13.1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Home Schools
Safe Unsafe
![Page 23: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
23
Community Attachment IndexCommunity Attachment Index• Relatives who live within driving distance
• Relatives who live within walking distance
• How important it is to feel a part of the community
• How often you feel a sense of belonging or membership in the community
• How much you feel at home in the area where you live
• How much you feel you have a lot in common with the people in your community
• How much you care what others think of your actions
• How important it is to live in this particular area
![Page 24: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
24
Community AttachmentCommunity Attachment
• Overall average score was 4.15.– Compared to the AARP national study: 4.20.
• People who answered “yes” or “strongly agree” for six or more of the variables in the index gave higher ratings for the overall quality of life in the Danville Region.
![Page 25: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
25
Community AttachmentCommunity Attachment
• Residents of the Danville Region have a strong sense of community, feel a sense of belonging, and feel it is important to live in this area
• Residents of the Danville Region feel they have an impact in making their community a better place to live
• Some residents expressed concern for safety in shopping areas
• The level of community attachment is at parity with national averages.
![Page 26: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
26
Civic ParticipationCivic Participation
![Page 27: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
27
Religious Service AttendanceReligious Service Attendance
42.2%
18.6%
39.2%
12.8%
28.8%
58.4%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Less thanmonthly or
never
Once ortwice amonth
Every weekor almost
every week
GSS Danville
![Page 28: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
28
Strongest Membership in Community OrganizationsStrongest Membership in Community Organizations
• Religious organizations (69%)• Hobby and recreation groups (24%)• School support groups (24%)• Organizations for older adults (24%)
Higher than the AARP national study.
![Page 29: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
29
Lower Memberships in Community Organizations
Lower Memberships in Community Organizations
• Labor unions (6.6%)• Professional and trade organizations (23%)• Neighborhood associations (12.6%)
Lower than the AARP national study.
![Page 30: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
30
Volunteer HoursVolunteer Hours
Lower volunteering hours than national average
Higher involvement in churches and religious organizations.
Lower involvement in foundations, fraternal associations, business organizations, community action organizations, and housing associations.
7.0%
8.0%
22.0%
21.0%
23.0%
12.0%
4.2%
5.1%
12.6%
21.4%
30.1%
26.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
More than 40hours
21-40 hours
11-20 hours
6-10 hours
3-5 hours
2 hours or less
AARP Danville
![Page 31: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
31
Civic SkillsCivic Skills
16.9%
17.3%
17.9%
23.9%
0% 25% 50%
Presentations
Officers
Wrote a letter
Lead a meeting
Percent
Officer percentages:Social Benchmark – 19.5%AARP – 26%NWAF – 33%
![Page 32: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
32
Civic InvolvementCivic Involvement
• Actively involved in religious organizations• Support school activities• Only a small percentage participate to the level of
acquiring civic skills• Volunteering: less than national averages• Results indicate the need for programs in the area
that directly foster leadership and civic involvement
![Page 33: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
33
Political ParticipationPolitical Participation
![Page 34: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
34
Participation in Political Activities
Participation in Political Activities
14.4%
30.5%
3.4%
21.6%
31.8%
0% 25% 50%
Worked to solvestate andnationalproblems
Worked to solvecommunityproblems
Protests,boycotts
Politicalcampaigns
Petitions
Percent
![Page 35: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
35
Trust in GovernmentTrust in Government
Most of the time34.2%
Never/ almost never5.9%
Only some of the time54.2% Just
about always5.6%
“Only some of the time”Social Benchmark – 46.5%
AARP – 41%
![Page 36: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
36
People in the EconomyPeople in the Economy
![Page 37: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
37
EmploymentEmployment
Full-time43.2%
Not employed
5.5%
Other4.8%
Part-time8.8%
Retired24.6%
Disabled7.7%
Temp not employed
5.4%
![Page 38: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
38
Perceptions of WorkPerceptions of Work
90.4%
94.9%
86.4%
93.2%
92.0%
74.7%
55.6%
71.5%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Use skills
Interesting work
Feel appreciated
See connection with benefits
Personal accomplishment
Opportunities to learn new skills
Opportunities for advancement
Fair compensation
Percent
![Page 39: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
39
Special Training—for what?Special Training—for what?
21.3%
27.7%
37.6%
13.4%
0% 25% 50%
Other
Changejobs
To improvejob
Required byjob
Percent
64% of employed respondents said they would be likely to take special training.
This graph shows the reasons why.
![Page 40: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
40
Economic SituationEconomic Situation
• More than 50% of respondents have been affected by the economic downturn
• A significant number of residents are currently unemployed, temporarily laid off or disabled, and only working part-time.
• Most employed residents derive meaning from their work and feel a sense of accomplishment
• A significant number are working more than 40 hours a week and holding more than one job
![Page 41: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
41
Children and SchoolsChildren and Schools
![Page 42: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
42
Stay or Go?What is Best for Children
Stay or Go?What is Best for Children
Better to leave69.8%
Better to stay
19.5%
Depends8.8%No
difference 1.9%
Q: “When a child from the Danville region is ready to leave home, do you think it would be better for them to stay in the Danville region or move to some other area to live?”
![Page 43: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
43
Rating of SchoolsRating of SchoolsGotten worse22.2% Gotten
better31.9%
About the same
46.0%
![Page 44: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
44
Challenges for Children and Youth
Challenges for Children and Youth
6.2%
19.5%
49.3%
4.1%
2.8%
10.5%
26.8%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Lack of parentalinvolvement
Lack of recreationalactivities
No jobs
Dropping out of school
Teen pregnancy
Gangs
Drugs
Percent
![Page 45: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
45
Schools and ChildrenSchools and Children
• More than three-fourths of respondents said that the Danville Region is a good place to raise children
• Nearly 70% said when a child is ready to leave home, it is better for them to move away
• Most respondents send their children to public schools.
• The biggest challenge affecting children and youth is the lack of jobs
![Page 46: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
46
Health IssuesHealth Issues
![Page 47: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
47
Overall Health StatusOverall Health Status
Very good36.7%
Excellent16.5%
Poor6.2%Fair
11.9%
Good28.6%
![Page 48: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
48
Overall Health ComparisonsOverall Health Comparisons
13.0%
26.0%
61.0%
12.7%
28.5%
58.8%
18.1%
28.6%
53.3%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Fair or poor
Good
Excellent orvery good
Percent
NHIS BRFSS Danville
![Page 49: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
49
Vigorous activity for children:how often?
Vigorous activity for children:how often?
Once or twice a week14.7%
3 or more times a week68.6%
Never8.2%Occasion
8.5%
![Page 50: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
50
TV Watching by ChildrenTV Watching by Children
1-2 hours46.4%
Less than 1 hour9.1%
5 or more hours21.3%
3-5 hours 23.2%
![Page 51: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
51
SummarySummary
![Page 52: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
52
Overall ResultsOverall Results• Residents have a strong sense of connectedness
evidenced by the neighbors they know• Residents are not as involved in community and
civic organizations• Residents are less likely to be taking leadership
positions and getting involved in the community• Residents have concern for safety in schools, and
worry about the future of their children• But ratings for overall quality of life are favorable
![Page 53: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCenter for Survey ResearchUniversity of Virginia
53
What does social capital looklike in the Danville Region?
What does social capital looklike in the Danville Region?
• Overall the level of social capital is fairly strong in terms of:– Community Attachment
– Social Connectedness
– Religious Involvement
• However, the Danville Region is in need of development in areas of civic engagement
![Page 54: 2009 Danville Region Social Capital Survey](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051401/568147c3550346895db50500/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
2009 Danville RegionSocial Capital Survey2009 Danville RegionSocial Capital SurveyFor further information please contact:
Thomas M. [email protected]
October 20, 2009