2009 Crofton DNT Thyroid Disruptors NBTS Meeting
-
Upload
kevincrofton -
Category
Environment
-
view
142 -
download
3
Transcript of 2009 Crofton DNT Thyroid Disruptors NBTS Meeting
Developmental Neurotoxicity and Thyroid Hormone Disruptors: Past,
Present and Future
Kevin M. Crofton, PhDSystems Biology Branch
Integrated Systems Toxicology DivisionNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park, NC
June 28, 2009Neurobehavioral Teratology Society
Roi Grande PR
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. EPA
Developmental Neurotoxicity and Thyroid Hormone Disruptors: Past,
Present and Future
Kevin M. Crofton, PhDSystems Biology Branch
Integrated Systems Toxicology DivisionNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park, NC
Wadsworth Center, Albany NYMay 14, 2009
Mode-of-action, Source to Outcome, Toxicity Pathway: No Matter What You Call It Behavioral Effects Are Critical and Behavioral Toxicologists
are Needed
Outline• Mode-of-Action:
What is it and what is it good for
• MOA Examples: Thyroid hormone disruption, thyroid cancer and developmental neurotoxicity Thyroid 101: Hormones, homeostasis and signaling Sites-of-action for TDCs
• Relevancy of animal data to humans• How can MOA help identify research needs
Developmental neurotoxicity of TDCs Acute neurotoxicity of pyrethroids
• How can thinking of MOA help with screening for toxicity
What is a Mode-of-Action?
• Mode of action is defined as the sequence of key cellular and biochemical events (measurable parameters) that result in a adverse health outcome.
• Critical to MOAs are causative relationships, not just correlations (Bradford Hill’s criteria for etiologic significance in epidemiologic investigations of causality)
Mode of ActionMode of ActionExposure-Dose-Response, Toxicity Pathway, Exposure-Dose-Response, Toxicity Pathway,
Adverse Outcome PathwayAdverse Outcome Pathway
Mode-of-action Framework by:
Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
KineticsHow does it get to where you don’t want it to be?• uptake• distribution• metabolism• elimination
DynamicsWhat does it do when it gets there?• initial key target• consequent effects at molecular,
cellular, organismal levels• adverse outcomes
TDCs - Multiple Targets
T4 -Gluc
T4 TTR/TBG
Hypothalamus
TRH
TSH
+
T3 & T4
T3 & T4
T4 > T3
Ah-Receptor
T4
UDPGTs
CAR/PXR
T4 T3Thyroperoxidase
I + tyrosine
T3 & T4
_
_Liver
T4 -Gluc
Biliary Excretion
Blood
Free- TH
Bound- TH -
Hypothalamus
Pituitary
Thyroid +
+
Ah-Receptor
T4
CAR/PXR
Iodine
Perchlorate Thiocyanate
T3
I + tyrosine
T3 & T4PTU
MancozebPronamide
PTU Octyl-methoxycinnamate
HO-PCBsEMD 49209
Dioxins
PBDEsPCBs
Peripheral Tissues
_
_
Deiodinases
TH TTR/TBG
UDPGTs
Tran
spor
ters
NISNISNISNIS
Thyroperoxidase Transporters
PBDEs
CoR
TH
TH CoA
AAAAA
TRE
TRTR
TDCs – Multiple Targets Thyroid Hormone Receptors
TRE
TR TR
CoR
XBPA
Ho-PCB
CoA
99
Thyroid Hyperplasia
Rat Thyroid Tumors
Health Risk
SerumT4 & T3
Modes of Action - ExamplesModes of Action - ExamplesCancer and Neurodevelopment in RatsCancer and Neurodevelopment in Rats
Altered Neuroanatomy
DevelopmentalDefects
HealthRisk
ThyroperoxidaseIodine Symporter
ExposureHepatic UDPGTs
Thyroidal
Extra-Thyroidal
Deiodinases
Thyroid Receptors
T4–TTR Binding
TSH
Mode-of-action Framework by:Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
MOA or Pathway “Thinking”What is it good for?
• Transparent process to characterize the weight of evidence to support an animal MOA
• Allows a determination of whether there is any evidence to reasonably exclude the same MOA in humans e.g., humans lack an enzyme that generates a toxic metabolite
• Importantly, the process of working through this analysis allows for identification of data needs = focused research
• Knowledge of key events allows identification of target that can be used in screening chemicals
Adapted from Cohen 2009
MOA Framework(IPCS, EPA, Health Canada)
Boobis et al (2008)
Do you have an MOA in animals and is it relevant to humans?
YES
NO
NO
YESMOA notRelevant
YESMOA notRelevant
NOProceed with
risk assessment
Proceed withrisk assessment
Is the weight of evidence sufficient to establish a mode of action (MOA) in animals?
Can human relevance be reasonably excluded on the basis of qualitative differences between animals and humans?
Can human relevance be reasonably excluded on the basis of quantitative differences between animals and humans?
1212
Thyroid Hyperplasia
Rat Thyroid Tumors
Health Risk
SerumT4 & T3
Modes of Action for TDCs - RatModes of Action for TDCs - Rat
Altered Neuro-Development
DevelopmentalDefects
HealthRisk
ThyroperoxidaseIodine Symporter
ExposureHepatic UDPGTs
Thyroidal
Extra-Thyroidal
Deiodinases
Thyroid Receptors
T4–TTR Binding
TSH
Mode-of-action Framework by:Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
Do these pathways apply to humans?
1313
Thyroid Hyperplasia
Rat Thyroid Tumors
Health Risk
SerumT4 & T3
Modes of Action for TDCs - RatModes of Action for TDCs - Rat
Altered Neuro-Development
DevelopmentalDefects
HealthRisk
ThyroperoxidaseIodine Symporter
ExposureHepatic UDPGTs
Thyroidal
Extra-Thyroidal
Deiodinases
Thyroid Receptors
T4–TTR Binding
TSH
Mode-of-action Framework by:Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
Do these pathways apply to humans?
1414
Thyroid Hyperplasia
Rat Thyroid Tumors
Health Risk
SerumT4 & T3
Modes of Action for TDCs – HumanModes of Action for TDCs – HumanExample CarbamazepineExample Carbamazepine
Altered Neuro-Development
DevelopmentalDefects
HealthRisk
ThyroperoxidaseIodine Symporter
ExposureHepatic UDPGTs
Thyroidal
Extra-Thyroidal
Deiodinases
Thyroid Receptors
T4–TTR Binding
TSH
Mode-of-action Framework by:Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
Subjects TT4 FT4 TSH Reference Healthy Volunteers Vainionpaa et al (2004) Epileptic children Liewendahl et al (1978) Epileptic girls Bensten et al (1983) Epileptic adults Fischel et al (1978) Epileptic adults Liewendahl et al (1980) Epileptic adults Connell et al (1984) Epileptic adults Rootwelt et al (1978)
= decrease; = no effect
Effects of carbamazepine on thyroid function in humansSubjects TT4 FT4 TSH Reference Healthy Volunteers Vainionpaa et al (2004) Epileptic children Liewendahl et al (1978) Epileptic girls Bensten et al (1983) Epileptic adults Fischel et al (1978) Epileptic adults Liewendahl et al (1980) Epileptic adults Connell et al (1984) Epileptic adults Rootwelt et al (1978)
= decrease; = no effect
Effects of carbamazepine on thyroid function in humansSubjects TT4 FT4 TSH Reference Healthy Volunteers Vainionpaa et al (2004) Epileptic children Liewendahl et al (1978) Epileptic girls Bensten et al (1983) Epileptic adults Fischel et al (1978) Epileptic adults Liewendahl et al (1980) Epileptic adults Connell et al (1984) Epileptic adults Rootwelt et al (1978)
= decrease; = no effect
Effects of carbamazepine on thyroid function in humans
1515
No Thyroid Hyperplasia
No Thyroid Tumors
No Health Risk
SerumT4 & T3
MOA Thyroid Tumors – HumanMOA Thyroid Tumors – HumanExample - CarbamazepineExample - Carbamazepine
Altered Neuro-Development
DevelopmentalDefects
HealthRisk
ThyroperoxidaseIodine Symporter
ExposureHepatic UDPGTs
Thyroidal
Extra-Thyroidal
Deiodinases
Thyroid Receptors
T4–TTR Binding
No TSH
Mode-of-action Framework by:Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
Is the Developmental MOA in Rats Relevant to Humans? YES!
• Normal thyroid hormone levels and receptor function are CRITICAL for normal development of the structure and function of the brain in both rats and humans• Humans:
• Over 100 years of data for iodine deficiency• Congenital hypothyroidism
• Animals:• Lots of analogous animal models
1717
SerumT4 & T3
MOA Thyroid Tumors – HumanMOA Thyroid Tumors – HumanExample – Iodine DeficiencyExample – Iodine Deficiency
Altered Neuro-Development
DevelopmentalDefects
HealthRisk
ThyroperoxidaseIodine Symporter
DietaryIodine
Hepatic UDPGTs
Thyroidal
Extra-Thyroidal
Deiodinases
Thyroid Receptors
T4–TTR Binding
Mode-of-action Framework by:Schulte, Environ Res. 48:129-44 1989
“High dose” = Cretinism“Low dose” = IQ losss
Research NeedsHow MOA ‘thinking” can focus research
1. One if MOA in animals is judged to be incomplete where are the data gaps Example pyrethroid acute neurotoxicity
2. In Human relevancy analysis – where are the data gaps• Lack of data translates to assumed relevance.• Example interspecies sensitivity to TDCs
3. Screening for prioritization If you know the molecular target – then develop low-cost
and high-throughput methods for that target
MOA Ex #1 - Pyrethroids
Exposure AbsorbedDose
Target Tissue Dose
Binding Molecular
Target
In Vitro HumanNeurons
OrganLevelEffect
AdverseClinicalOutcome
Exposure AbsorbedDose
Target Tissue Dose
MolecularTarget
In Vitro RatNeuron
Firing Rate
OrganLevelEffect
AdverseClinical
Outcome
Human
Exposure & Kinetics Modeling
Effects Modeling
Too many unknowns for to call this an established MOA
Binding Molecular
Target
In Vitro HumanNeurons
OrganLevelEffect
AdverseClinicalOutcome
MolecularTarget
In Vitro RatNeuron
Firing Rate
OrganLevelEffect
AdverseClinical
Outcome
Human
Na Channel work almost all in vitroNeed a good in vivo biomarker
Mostly in vitro firing ratesNeed in vivo data
Rat
MOA for Acute Pyrethroid Neurotoxicity?
If key initiating event is changes in VGSC kinetics, then how does this translate into changes in behavior??
Available biochem and physiologydata not correlative
Behavior data from high dose studies
Use in vitro models to compare rat and human cell lines
100 25 00
25
50
75
100
125
0
25
50
75
100
125
66 50TH Concentration
Dys
func
tion
(% C
ontro
l)
100 25 00
25
50
75
100
125
0
25
50
75
100
125
66 50TH Concentration
Dys
func
tion
(% C
ontro
l)
Rat
Human
MOA Ex. #2 – Interspecies Sensitivity
100 25 00
25
50
75
100
125
0
25
50
75
100
125
66 50TH Concentrations
Dys
func
tion
(% C
ontro
l)
Most experimental
“sledgehammer”models
Likely human environmental
exposures
Data Need: Comparative dose-response data for rats and humans
2222
Humans dose response data is very limitedHaddow et al. (1999) Even low level maternal
hypothyroxinemia (second trimester) leads to adverse outcomes (~25% T4 leads to IQ loss)
Animal dose response data: more, but limited
Comparative Sensitivity – Rat and Human
Crofton (2004)
Pup PN21 T4 vs PS LTP 60m
Pup PN21 T4 Percent of Control
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
PS L
TP %
Con
trol
90100110120130140150160170180190200210
M0805 PTUM0703 PERCM0102 PTUGD18-PN21 PTU
r2=0.84
Log Thyroxine Concentration, % Control3103060100
Hea
ring
Loss
, dB
SP
L (d
iffer
ence
from
con
trol)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
y = -33.68*logX + 68.72 r ² = 0.8519
Gilbert, unpublished
Synaptic plasticity vs T4Hearing vs T4 – 50% lossWhat amount of change is adverse?
50% during critical window
??
MOA Ex #3 - Screening• Chemicals with info on thyroid endpoint is
less than 200
• Chemicals with potential for exposure and lacking any assessments has been estimated to be around ~10,000
• Regardless of all the other uncertainties, this is a high priority
We cannot test our way out of this problem starting with rodent studies, especially not using developmental exposures
Developing a New Way of Doing Business
+ If you know the key initiating event (or events) then develop efficient screens for this target
+ Use these screen to prioritize for further testing not for regulation
+ Start with 500 or 600 chemicals – identify the ‘worst actors” – and then test them in a tiered testing strategy
+ e.g., in vitro TPO inhibition assay, then test in 96 well Xenopus assay, then in mammals, higher to medium to lower throughput
Ongoing Methods DevelopmentIf you know the key initiating event (or events) – then develop efficient
screens
1) Receptor based screening at EPA’s NCCT e.g. PXR, AhR, PPAR, TRbeta recently completed screening of 320 pesticidal chemicals
2) TPO screening 96 well medium throughput assay for inhibition of porcine TPO (Mike
Hornung at ORD’s Duluth Lab)3) TH signaling in transgenic X. laevis
96-well format for detecting alterations in TR signaling (Barbara Demeneix - Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41:5908–5914)
4) OECD/IPCS Advisory Group – Collating & summarizing available assays
A NEGATIVE IN THESE SCREENS DOES NOT TRANSLATE TO NO HAZARD!
Screening for Thyroid Disruptors
Current Approaches
Standard approach
• Guidelines
• ‘Triggered’ testing
• Low throughput
New Tiered Approach
Screening for Prioritization
HTP in vitro/QSAR
L-MTP - alt species?
Targeted mammalian testing
Paradigm Shift for Tox TestingNew Tiered Approach
Screening for Prioritization
HTP in vitro
L- MTP alt species
Targeted mammalian testing
1,000s
100s
10s
Screening for Prioritization
Testing for Hazard
Assessments
Summary• MOA Approach helps to focus research
• Development of MOAs requires adverse outcome data – without it the MOA is neutered.
• A number of thyroid pathways are known that if disturbed during developmental result in neurological deficiencys Multiple targets involved In vitro models are available for many of the targets
• Need to develop testing methods that can be used for Screening for Prioritization Also needed --- tiered testing strategies
• For this strategy to work the input and research from behavioral folks is critical!
Thank you for listening