2009 – 2010 Minnetonka Youth Hockey Assessment Survey Results
description
Transcript of 2009 – 2010 Minnetonka Youth Hockey Assessment Survey Results
2009 – 2010 Minnetonka Youth 2009 – 2010 Minnetonka Youth Hockey Assessment Survey ResultsHockey Assessment Survey Results
April 2010April 2010
SummarySummary
Number of total survey participantsNumber of total survey participants 308*308*
Every team was represented with the exception of Every team was represented with the exception of a few rookie mite teamsa few rookie mite teams
Survey dates: February 19 to April 14, 2010Survey dates: February 19 to April 14, 2010
33
Most (81%) indicated that Most (81%) indicated that hockey is their primary sport.hockey is their primary sport.
Not primary19%
Hockey is primary
81%
Q2.4. Is hockey your primary sport? (n=258; graph based to those that answered the question).
44
Players participated in a Players participated in a variety of organized sports. variety of organized sports.
56%
32% 30%
22%18% 17%
12% 11% 10%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Baseball/softball Soccer Golf Football Snow skiing Lacrosse Tennis Swimming Snowboarding
Q2.2. What organized sports or activities, other than hockey, did you participate in during 2009/2010? (n=225; graph based to those that answered the question).
55
Most decided to play MYHA Most decided to play MYHA for their love of the game.for their love of the game.
79%
8%4% 3% 3% 3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Main Reasons for Playing (top mentions)
Q2.5. What is the ONE main reason you decided to play MYHA hockey this season? (n=253; graph based to those that answered the question).
I love to play hockey
I wanted to be active in a
winter sport
I just wanted to try it
My parent's wanted me to
try it
I wanted to play with friends
I wanted to learn how to
play the game better
No one mentioned:“I wanted to win games.”
66
The majority of players had an excellent The majority of players had an excellent or very good overall experience. or very good overall experience.
About one in ten said it was fair or poorAbout one in ten said it was fair or poor
Overall experience:
9%10%
81%
Excellent/Very good Good Fair/Poor
Q5.1 Please rate your overall hockey experience in 2009-10: (n=219; graph based to those that answered the question).
77
Most players had fun this season. 7% did not. Most players had fun this season. 7% did not.
I had fun this season (agree or diasagree).
7%
93%
Agree Disagree
Q5.2 I had fun this season. (n=217; graph based to those that answered the question).
88
Many agreed that their individual and team Many agreed that their individual and team skills improved over the course of the season.skills improved over the course of the season.How much did your INDIVIDUAL skills improve?
7%
40%
53%
Improved greatly
Improved somewhat
No improvement
Q5.4./Q5.5 How much did your individual hockey skills improve this season? (n=219; graph based to those that answered the question). How much did you hockey team improve over the course of the season? (n=217; graph based to those that answered the question).
How much did your TEAM skills improve?
8%
41%
51%
Improved greatly
Improved somewhat
No improvement
99
Many were comfortable with the number of Many were comfortable with the number of practices and games. About onepractices and games. About one
third would have preferred more games. third would have preferred more games.
Number of practices:
18%
77%
5%
Too many Just right Not enough
Number of regular season games:
31%
68%
1%
Too many Just right Not enough
Q5.6./Q5.7 The number of practices your team had was…? (n=219; graph based to those that answered the question). How And the number of games your team played was… (n=218; graph based to those that answered the question).
1010
Most players thought that the number of Most players thought that the number of tournaments was appropriate.tournaments was appropriate.
Number of tournaments:
24%
75%
1%
Too many Just right Not enough
Q5.8 The number of tournaments your team had was... (n=217; graph based to those that answered the question).
1111
Most players also thought that the length Most players also thought that the length of the season met expectations.of the season met expectations.
Length of season:
2%
78%
20%
Too short Just right too long
Q5.9 The season length was... (n=216; graph based to those that answered the question).
1212Q5.10. The cost to play hockey this past season with MYHA (not including equipment) was...n=218; graph based to those
that answered the question).
A majority thought the cost to play was A majority thought the cost to play was reasonable. 40% said it was too expensive reasonable. 40% said it was too expensive
(3% said it was a good deal). (3% said it was a good deal).
40%
57%
3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Too expensive Reasonable A good deal
Cost to Play
1313
Approximately 80% rated their coaches Approximately 80% rated their coaches as very good or excellent. One in seven as very good or excellent. One in seven rated their head coach as fair or poor. rated their head coach as fair or poor.
Head Coach Rating:
9%
14%
77%
Excellent/Very good Good Fair/Poor
Assistant Coach Rating:
10% 5%
85%
Excellent/Very good Good Fair/Poor
Q3.2./Q4.1 What is your overall rating of your head coach? (n=225; graph based to those that answered the question). What is your overall rating of your assistant coaches? (n=217; graph based to those that answered the question).
1414
Approximately 83% rated their head coach’s Approximately 83% rated their head coach’s knowledge of hockey as excellent or very good. knowledge of hockey as excellent or very good.
Head Coach Knowledge:
83%
10% 7%
Excellent/Very good Good Fair/Poor
Q3.3 My coach’s knowledge of hockey was… (n=225; graph based to those that answered the question).
1515
The ratings of the head coach The ratings of the head coach were respectable.were respectable.
88% 12%
88% 12%
89% 11%
84% 16%
87% 13%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
My coach communicated well withthe players
My coach communicated well withthe parents
My coach displayed and taughtgood sportsmanship on the ice,
bench & in the locker room
My coach motivated by praisingeffort and encouraging players
My coach listened to concerns andwas approachable
% agreeing or disagreeing with each statement:
Agree Disagree
Some room for improvement.
Q3.6. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about your HEAD coach. (n=222; graph based to those that answered the question).
1616
The ratings of the head coach The ratings of the head coach were respectable. (cont.)were respectable. (cont.)
89% 11%
89% 11%
83% 17%
94% 6%
88% 12%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
My coach stressed positive learningand fun, not strictly w inning
My coach was a good role model
My coach was good at teaching hockeyskills
My coach was respectful of officials
My coach's practices were pre-plannedand organized
% agreeing or disagreeing with each statement:
Agree Disagree
Some room for improvement.
Q3.6. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about your HEAD coach. (n=222; graph based to those that answered the question).
1717
Most players enjoyed playing for Most players enjoyed playing for their head coaches and would play their head coaches and would play
for them again. 10% disagreed.for them again. 10% disagreed.
84% 16%
90% 10%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
I enjoyed playing formy coach
I would recommendhim/her to coach again
% agreeing or disagreeing with each statement:
Agree Disagree
Some room for improvement.
Q4.3. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about your HEAD coach. (n=222; graph based to those that answered the question).
1818
About half agreed that the tryout process was very About half agreed that the tryout process was very good or excellent. 21% rated it as fair or poor. good or excellent. 21% rated it as fair or poor.
54%
25%
21%
Excellent/Very good Good Fair/Poor
Q5.12. Your impression of the 2009-10 tryout process was...(n=175; graph based to those that answered the question).
1919Q5.3. The level that I played at was...(n=220; graph based to those that answered the question).
Most players believed they were Most players believed they were placed at the correct level. placed at the correct level.
81%
1%
18%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
The right level for myskill
Too challenging for myskill
Not challengingenough for my skill
2020
Expected retention is excellent, with nearly 90% Expected retention is excellent, with nearly 90% indicating they will play hockey again next season!indicating they will play hockey again next season!
89%
4% 7%
Will play next year Will not play next year Not sure
Q5.11. Do you plan to play hockey next season (2010-11)? (n=219; graph based to those that answered the question).