2009 02-22 144117-ch08

41
Managerial Acc Managerial Acc Tools for Business Decisio Tools for Business Decisio Canad Canad Weygandt Kieso Kimmel Aly

description

 

Transcript of 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Page 1: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Managerial Accounting:Managerial Accounting:Tools for Business Decision-MakingTools for Business Decision-Making

Canadian EditionCanadian Edition

Weygandt ● Kieso ● Kimmel ● Aly

Page 2: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Pricing

Chapter 8

Page 3: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Study ObjectivesStudy Objectives

Calculate a target cost when a product’s price is determined by the market.

Calculate target selling price using cost-plus pricing.

Use time and material pricing to determine the cost of services provided.

Chapter 8 Chapter 8 Pricing Pricing

Page 4: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Study Objectives: ContinuedStudy Objectives: Continued

Define “transfer price” and its role in an organization.

Determine a transfer price using the negotiated, cost-based, and market-based approaches.

Explain the issues that arise when transferring goods between divisions located in countries with different tax rates.

Page 5: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

External SalesExternal Sales Many factors affect price Product price should cover costs and earn acover costs and earn a reasonable profit reasonable profit Must have a good understanding of market forces for

appropriate price

•Fixed and variable costs•Short-run or long-run

Pricing Objectives

Demand

Environment

•Gain market share•Achieve a target rate of return

•Political reaction to prices•Patent or copyright protection

Cost Considerations

•Price sensitivity•Demographics

What Prices Should

Be Charged?

Page 6: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

External SalesExternal Sales (Continued)(Continued)

A company can accept the price as set by the competitive market (supply and demand)

Market sets price when product cannot be easily differentiated from competing productsExamples: farm products and minerals

A company can set the price when Product is specially made One of a kind

No one else produces the product Company can differentiate its product from others

Examples: Designer dress and patent or copyright on a unique process

Page 7: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Target CostingTarget Costing

In a highly competitive market, price is largely price is largely determined by supply and demanddetermined by supply and demand

Must control costs to earn a profit Target costTarget cost – cost that provides the desired

profit on a product when the seller does not have control over the product’s price

Page 8: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Target CostingTarget Costing Steps Steps

1) Find marketmarket niche Select segment to compete in, For example, luxury goods or economy goods

2) Determine target price:target price: Price that company believes would place it in the optimal position for its target audience Use market research

3) Determine target cost:target cost: Difference between target price and desired profit Includes all product and period costs necessary to make and market the product

4) Assemble expert team:team:Includes production, operations, marketing, financeDesign and develop a product that meets quality specifications while not exceeding target cost

Page 9: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Plus PricingCost-Plus Pricing

May have to set own price where there is little or no competition

Price typically a function of product cost Steps:

Establish a cost base Add a markupmarkup (based on desired operating

income or return on investment)

Cost + (Mark-up % x Cost) = Target Selling Price

Page 10: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Plus Pricing Cost-Plus Pricing ExampleExample

Cleanmore Products, manufactures of wet/dry shop vacuums has following Cost data at budgeted sales volume of 10,000 Units.

Cleanmore has decided to price its new shop vacuum to earn a 20-percent return on its investment (ROI) of $1 million.

Page 11: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Plus PricingCost-Plus Pricing Example (Continued) Example (Continued)

Total fixed cost per unit:Total fixed cost per unit:

(280,000+240,000) ÷ 10,000 = 52

Expected ROI:Expected ROI:

20% ROI of $1,000,000 = $200,000

Expected ROI per unit: Expected ROI per unit:

$200,000 ÷ 10,000 units = 20

Expected Selling Price: Expected Selling Price:

60+ 52 + 20 = $132 per unit

Page 12: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Plus Pricing Cost-Plus Pricing Limitations Limitations

Advantage – Easy to calculateEasy to calculate Disadvantages:

Does not consider demand side

Will the customer pay the price?Will the customer pay the price?

Fixed cost per unit changes with change in volume

At At lowerlower sales volume, company must charge sales volume, company must charge higher higher price to meet desired ROIprice to meet desired ROI

Page 13: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Variable Cost PricingVariable Cost Pricing

Alternative pricing approach: Simply add a markup to variable costsSimply add a markup to variable costs

Avoids using poor cost information related to fixed costs per unit

Useful in pricing special orders or when excess capacity exists

Major disadvantage: Prices set too low to cover fixed costsPrices set too low to cover fixed costs

Page 14: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Let’s ReviewLet’s Review

Cost-plus pricing means that:

a. Selling price = Variable cost + (Markup percentage + Variable cost)

b. Selling price = Cost + (Markup percentage x Cost)

c. Selling price = Manufacturing cost + (Markup percentage + Manufacturing cost)

d. Selling price = Fixed cost + (Markup percentage x Fixed cost)

Page 15: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Let’s Review: SolutionLet’s Review: Solution

Cost-plus pricing means that:

a. Selling price = Variable cost + (Markup percentage + Variable cost)

b.b. Selling price = Cost + (Markup percentage x Selling price = Cost + (Markup percentage x Cost)Cost)

c. Selling price = Manufacturing cost + (Markup percentage + Manufacturing cost)

d. Selling price = Fixed cost + (Markup percentage x Fixed cost)

Page 16: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material PricingTime and Material Pricing

An approach to cost-plus pricing in which the company uses twotwo pricing rates: One for the labour labour used on a job One for the materialmaterial

Widely used in service industries, especially professional firms Public accounting Law Engineering

Page 17: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material PricingTime and Material Pricing Example

LAKE HOLIDAY MARINABudgeted Costs for the Year 2005

Time Charges MaterialLoading Charges¹

Mechanics’ wages and benefits $103,500 $ 0Parts manager’s salary and benefits 0 11,500Office employee’s salary and benefits 20,700 2,300Other overhead (supplies, amortization,property taxes, advertising, utilities) 26,800 14,400Total budgeted costs $151,000 $28,200

¹ The invoice cost of the materials is not included inthe material loading charges.

Page 18: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material Pricing Time and Material Pricing Example (Continued)

Determine a charge for labour time Express as a rate per hour of labour; Rate includes:

Direct labour cost of employees (includes fringe benefits)

Selling, administrative, and similar overhead costs

Allowance for desired profit (ROI) per hour of employee time

Labour rate for Lake Holiday Marina for 2005 based on: 5,000 hours of repair time Desired profit margin of $8 per hour

Page 19: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material PricingTime and Material Pricing

Example – Lake Holiday Marina (Continued)Example – Lake Holiday Marina (Continued)

Total ÷ Total = Per Hour

Per Hour Cost Hours ChargeHourly labour rate for repairs

Mechanics wages/benefits $103,500 ÷ 5,000 = $20.70Overhead Costs

Office employees salaries/benefits 20,700 ÷ 5,000 = 4.14Office overhead 26,800 ÷ 5,000 = 5.36

Total hourly cost $151,000 ÷ 15,000 = $30.20Profit Margin 8.00Rate charged per hour of labourRate charged per hour of labour $38.20 $38.20

Page 20: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material Pricing Time and Material Pricing Example (Continued) Example (Continued)

Calculate the Material Loading Charge

Material loading chargeMaterial loading charge added to invoice price of materials to determine materials price

Estimated annual costs of purchasing, receiving, handling, storing + desired profit margin on materials

Expressed as a percentage of estimated annual parts and materials cost:

Estimated purchasing, receiving, Estimated purchasing, receiving, handing, storing costshanding, storing costs

++

Desired profit margin Desired profit margin on materialson materials

Estimated costs of parts/materialsEstimated costs of parts/materials

Page 21: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material PricingTime and Material Pricing

Example –Lake Holiday Marina (Continued)Example –Lake Holiday Marina (Continued)

Material Total Invoice Material Loading ÷ Costs Parts = Loading

Per Hour Charges and Material PercentageOverhead costs Parts manager’s salary and benefits $11,500 Office employee’s salary 2,300

13,800 ÷ $120,000 = 11.50%Other overhead 4,400 ÷ 120,000 = 12.00%

$28,200 ÷ 120,000 = 23.50%Profit margin 20.00%Material loading percentage 43.50%43.50%

Page 22: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material Pricing Time and Material Pricing Example (Continued)Example (Continued)

Calculate Charges for a Particular Job =

Labour charges

+

Material charges

+

Material loading

charge

Page 23: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Time and Material Pricing Time and Material Pricing Example (Continued)Example (Continued)

Determine a price quote to refurbish a pontoon boat: Estimated 50 hours of labour Estimated $3,600 parts and materials

Page 24: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Internal SalesInternal Sales

Vertically integrated companies – grow in direction of customers or supplies

Frequently transfer goods to other divisions as well as outside customers

How do you price goods when they are “sold” within the company?How do you price goods when they are “sold” within the company?

Page 25: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Internal SalesInternal Sales

Transfer priceTransfer price – price used to record the transfer between two divisions of a company

Ways to determine a transfer price: Negotiated transfer prices Cost-based transfer prices Market-based transfer prices

ConceptuallyConceptually - a negotiated transfer price is best Due to practical considerationspractical considerations, other two methods

are more widely used

Negotiated transfer prices is determined by agreementagreement of the division managers when no external market price is available

Page 26: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Negotiated Transfer PriceNegotiated Transfer Price Example: Alberta CompanyExample: Alberta Company

Sells hiking boots as well as soles for work & hiking boots

Structured into two divisions: Boot and Sole Sole Division - sells soles externally Boot Division - makes leather uppers for hiking boots

which are attached to purchased soles

Each Division Manager compensated on division profitability

Management now wants Sole Division to provide at least some soles to the Boot Division

Page 27: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Negotiated Transfer Price Negotiated Transfer Price Example: Alberta Company (Continued)Example: Alberta Company (Continued)

Divisional Contribution Margin Per UnitDivisional Contribution Margin Per Unit

(Boot Division purchases soles from outsiders)

What would be a fair transfer price if the Sole Division What would be a fair transfer price if the Sole Division

sold 10,000 soles to the Boot Division?sold 10,000 soles to the Boot Division?

Page 28: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Negotiated Transfer Price Negotiated Transfer Price Example: Alberta Company (Continued)Example: Alberta Company (Continued)

Sole Division has nono excess capacityexcess capacity If Sole sells to Boot, payment must at leastat least cover

variable cost per unit variable cost per unit plus plus its lostits lost

contribution margin per sole (opportunity cost)contribution margin per sole (opportunity cost) The minimum transfer price acceptable to Sole:

Maximum Boot Division will pay

what the sole would cost from an outside buyerwhat the sole would cost from an outside buyer

Page 29: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Negotiated Transfer Price Negotiated Transfer Price Example: Alberta Company (Continued)Example: Alberta Company (Continued)

Sole Division has excess capacity excess capacity Can produce 80,000 soles, but can sell only 70,000 Available capacity of 10,000 soles Contribution margin is not lost The minimum transfer price acceptable to Sole:

Negotiate a transfer price between $11 (minimum (minimum acceptable to Sole)acceptable to Sole) and $17 (maximum acceptable to Boot)(maximum acceptable to Boot)

Page 30: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Negotiated Transfer PriceNegotiated Transfer Price Variable Costs

In the minimum transfer price formula, variable cost is the variable cost of units soldvariable cost is the variable cost of units sold internallyinternally

May differ – higher or lower – for units sold internally versus those sold externally

The minimum transfer pricing formula can still be used – just use the internal variable costs

Page 31: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Negotiated Transfer PriceNegotiated Transfer PriceSummarySummary

Transfer prices established:

Minimum by selling division

Maximum by the buying division

Often not used because:

Market price information sometimes not available

Lack of trust between the two divisions

Different pricing strategies between divisions

Therefore, companies often use cost or market based information to develop transfer prices

Page 32: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Based Transfer PricesCost-Based Transfer Prices

Uses costs incurred by the division producing the goods as its foundation

May be based on variable costs or variable costs plus fixed costs

Markup may also be added Can result in improper transfer prices causing:

Loss of profitability for company Unfair evaluation of division performance

Page 33: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Based Transfer Prices Cost-Based Transfer Prices Example: Alberta CompanyExample: Alberta Company

Base transfer price on variable cost of sole and no excess no excess

capacitycapacity

Bad deal for Sole Division – no profit on transfer of 10,000 soles and loses profit of $70,000 on external sales.

Boot Division increases contribution margin by $6 per sole

Page 34: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Based Transfer Prices Cost-Based Transfer Prices Example: Alberta Company Example: Alberta Company (Continued)(Continued)

Sole Division has excess capacityexcess capacity: Continues to report zero profit but does not Continues to report zero profit but does not lose the $7 per unit due to excess capacitylose the $7 per unit due to excess capacity

Boot Division gains $6 Overall, company is better off by

$60,000 (10,000 X 6) Does not reflect Sole Division’s true

profitability

Page 35: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Cost-Based Transfer PricesCost-Based Transfer Prices Summary Summary

DisadvantagesDisadvantages Does not reflect a division’s true profitability Does not provide an incentive to control

costs which are passed on to the next division

AdvantagesAdvantages Simple to understand Easy to use due to availability of information Market information often not available

Most common method Most common method

Page 36: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Market-Based Transfer PricesMarket-Based Transfer Prices

Based on existing market prices of competing products

Often considered best approach because: Objective Economic incentives

IndifferentIndifferent between selling internally and externally if can charge/pay market price

Can lead to bad decisions if have excess capacity

Why? No opportunity cost.Why? No opportunity cost. Where there is not a well-defined market price,

companies use cost-based systems

Page 37: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Effect of Outsourcing on Transfer Effect of Outsourcing on Transfer PricesPrices

Contracting with an external party to provide a good or service, rather than doing the work internally

Virtual CompaniesVirtual Companies outsource all of their production

As outsourcing increases, fewer components are transferred internally between divisions

Use incremental analysis to determine if outsourcing is profitable

Page 38: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Transfers between Divisions in Transfers between Divisions in Different CountriesDifferent Countries

Going global increases transfers between divisions located in different countries

60% of trade between countries estimated to be transfers between divisions

Different tax rates make determining appropriate transfer price more difficult

Page 39: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Transfers between Divisions in Transfers between Divisions in Different CountriesDifferent Countries

Example: Alberta CompanyExample: Alberta Company

Boot Division is in a country with 10% tax rate Sole Division is located in a country with a 30% rate The before-tax total contribution margin is $44

regardless of whether the transfer price is $18 or $11 The after-tax totalafter-tax total is

$38.20 using the $18 transfer price, and $39.60 using the $11 transfer price

Why? More of the contribution margin is attributed Why? More of the contribution margin is attributed to the division in the country with the lower tax rate.to the division in the country with the lower tax rate.

Page 40: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Transfers between Divisions in Transfers between Divisions in Different CountriesDifferent Countries

Example: Alberta Company (Continued)Example: Alberta Company (Continued)

Page 41: 2009 02-22 144117-ch08

Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Access Copyright (The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency) is unlawful. Requests for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his or her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The author and the publisher assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

CopyrightCopyright