2003new Haven
-
Upload
george-ezar-n-quiriado -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 2003new Haven
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
1/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Principles for Classroom and
Curricular Innovation
Jeff Froyd, Texas A&M [email protected]
http:!!!.foundationcoalition.or"
mailto:[email protected]://www.foundationcoalition.org/http://www.foundationcoalition.org/mailto:[email protected]
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
2/143
"There is an incredible
evolution of learning oreducation as almost the
sole source of competitive
advantage in an economy
that has changed so much."
#o!ard $loc% Mana"in" 'irector
$anc of America (ecurities
An investment)*an% and *ro%era"e
su*sidiary of $an% of America.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
3/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"es in +n"ineerin" +ducation
, Challenges
-Challen"e of lifelon" learnin"
-Challen"e of pro*lem solvin" -Challen"e of en"ineerin" desi"n
-Challen"e of transfer
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
4/143
LASSI SCALEENGR111
(Mean)CVEN349
(Mean)Significance*
Skill Componen
Information Processing 60.68 60.29 0.930Test Strategies 64.33 63.27 0.794
Selecting Main Ideas 55.18 59.29 0.342
!ill Componen
n!iet" 60.52 67.12 0.147
ttit#de 42.47 34.56 0.080
Moti$ation 63.30 59.29 0.397
Self"#eg$laion Componen
%oncentration 61.31 54.56 0.144
Self&testing 52.47 37.92 0.006
St#d" ids 60.24 45.04 0.005
Time Management 55.23 47.65 0.134
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
5/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"
'espite individual professors/ dedication and efforts to developpro*lem solvin" s%ill "eneral pro*lem solvin" s%ill0 !as notdeveloped in the four years in our under"raduate pro"ram.(tudents "raduated sho!in" the same ina*ility that they had!hen they started the pro"ram. (ome could not create
hypotheses1 some misread pro*lem statements. 'urin" the four)year under"raduate en"ineerin" pro"ram studied 2345)2346the students had !or%ed over 7888 home!or% pro*lems theyhad o*served a*out 2888 sample solutions *ein" !or%ed on the*oard *y either the teacher or *y peers and they had !or%ed
many open)ended pro*lems. In other !ords they sho!ed noimprovement in pro*lem solvin" s%ills despite the *est intentionsof their instructors.0
!oo%&' e al (199) +e,eloping -#o.lem Sol,ing Skill&/ 0e
McMa&e# -#o.lem Sol,ing -#og#am'2 o$#nal of Enginee#ing E%$caion'
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
6/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"
, Ineffective approach #1. give the studentsopenended problems to solve! This, we
now see, is ineffective because the
students get little feedbac about the !rocess ste!s, they tend to reinforce bad
habits, they do not now what !rocesses
they should be using and they resort totrying to collect sa"!le solutions and
"atch !ast "e"ori#ed sa"!le solutions to
new !roble" situations$
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
7/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"
, Ineffective approach # $ho% them ho% yousolve problems by %or&ing many problems on theboard and handing out many sample solutions - This, we now see, is ineffective because teachers know too
much. Teachers demonstrate "exercise solving". Teachersdo not make mistakes; they do not struggle to figure outwhat the problem really is. They work forwards; notbackwards from the goal. They do not demonstrate the"problem solving" process; they demonstrate the "exercise
solving" process. If they did demonstrate "problem solving"with all its mistakes and trials, the students would brand theteacher as incompetent. We know; we tried
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
8/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"
, Ineffective approach #' (ave studentssolve problems on the board
- !ifferent students use different approaches to
solving problems; what works for one wont workfor others. When we used this method as a
research tool, the students reported "we learned
nothing to help us solve problems by watching #im,
$ue and %rad solve those problems"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
9/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"
, Through four research pro)ects %e identified %hyand ho% these and other teaching methods failed
to develop process s&ills and %hich methods
%ere successful in developing the s&ills, *oods, +.., J.+. *right, T.*. (offman, .-. $%artman and I.+. +oig 1/02 "Teaching
3roblem $olving $&ills," 4nnals of 5ngineering 5ducation, 1, 1, '67'.
, *oods, +.. et al. 1/0/2 "8a)or Challenges to Teaching 3roblem $olving" 4nnals of
5ngineering 5ducation, 09, :o. ' p. 00 to 67, 1/0/ and "; Challenges to Teaching
3roblem $olving" C(58 1' :e%s no. 1 1/62.
, *oods, +.. 1//'a2 "3roblem solving %here are %e no%
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
10/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of +n"ineerin" 'esi"n
The literature is filled !ith positive comments from studentsinstructors and industrial sponsors !ho have participated in
capstone desi"n courses. The vast ma9ority of participants feel
that the course *enefited all involved.
The nature of capstone desi"n courses ho!ever often leads to apurely sub)ective evaluation %ith little or no >hard evidence?
of actual benefits. $orn for example does not attempt to prove
the value of senior level desi"n courses. #e simply states that he
is convinced from his experiences that such courses are
valua*le. ther educators have similar feelin"s0 as to the
relative costs and *enefits of capstone desi"n courses.
'#tson( .).( Todd( *.+.( Magle,"( S.P.( Sorensen( %.'.( -1997 / *e$ie of iterat#re
on Teacing ngineering 'esign Tro#g Proect&riented %astone %o#rses. Journal of
Engineering Education
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
11/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Transfer
esearches posed this problem to people.
;(uppose you are a doctor faced !ith a patient !ho has amali"nant tumor in his stomach. It is impossi*le to operate onthe patient *ut unless the tumor is destroyed the patient !ill die.
There is a %ind of ray that can *e used to destroy the tumor. Ifthe rays reach the tumor all at once at a sufficiently hi"h intensitythe tumor !ill *e destroyed. Unfortunately at this intensity thehealthy tissue that the rays pass throu"h on the !ay to the tumor!ill also *e destroyed. At lo!er intensities the rays are harmless
to healthy tissue *ut they !ill not affect the tumor either.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
12/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Transfer
Consider the follo%ing story
;A small country !as ruled from a stron" fortress *y a dictator. The fortress!as situated in the middle of the country surrounded *y farms and villa"es.Many roads led to the fortress throu"h the countryside. A re*el "eneral vo!edto capture the fortress. The "eneral %ne! that an attac% *y his entire army!ould capture the fortress. #e "athered his army at the head of one of theroads ready to launch a full)scale direct attac%. #o!ever the "eneral thenlearned that the dictator had planted mines on each of the roads. The mines!ere set so that small *odies of men could pass over them safely since thedictator need to move his troops and !or%ers to and from the fortress.#o!ever any lar"e force !ould detonate the mines. >ot only !ould this *lo!up the road *ut it !ould also destroy many nei"h*orin" villa"es. It therefore
seemed impossi*le to capture the fortress. #o!ever the "eneral devised asimple plan. #e divided his army into small "roups and dispatched each"roup to the head of a different road.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
13/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Challen"e of Transfer
, After the su*9ects read and summari?ed this storythey !ere as%ed to solve the tumor pro*lem underthe "uise of a separate experiment.
, iven the clear analo"y you mi"ht thin% that
performance !ould *e near ceilin". (urprisin"ly only78 of the su*9ects offered a conver"ence solution.
, Moreover !hen these same su*9ects !ere "iven thesu""estion that they should use the eneral story
68 provided a conver"ence solution., This findin" demonstrates that half the su*9ects could
apply the eneral story to the tumor pro*lem !henthey !ere instructed to *ut did not do so on their o!n.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
14/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Bocusin" Activity 6 minutesD
, I:+I@I+A4BB D use ' minutes to %riteyour description of learning, %hat it is,
%hat it loo&s li&e, ho% you might recogniEe
%hen it has occurred, etc., 4$ 4 34I D use minutes to discuss
descriptions %ith someone sitting net to
you. If you have additional time, develop aconsensus description of learning.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
15/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Bocusin" Activity
, +ifferent %ays to describe the same thing, $upported by partner
, Bearning is a process, highly mental, &ey to creativity and using our eperience
, Bearning and &no%ledge is applied, specifically and the usefulness of %hat %aslearned
, Bearning is process of acGuiring of &no%ledge and s&ills and there are different
levels, $tarted %ith process of acGuiring basic level s&ills and understanding the
processes and using &no%ledge and s&ills to solve problems
, elationsihip bet%een seeing big picture and incremental s&ills, transferringbet%een the t%o
, *e have a narro% perspective based on similar bac&grounds
, $atisfaction %ith life, learning can be satisfying, 4pproach as problem solving, partner brought in survival, lifelong learning
different perspectives2
, 8ore than )ust engineering learning
, +ifferent general approach vs. more detailed approach
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
16/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Model for Eearnin" and Teachin"
Jeff Froyd, Texas A&M University
http:!!!.foundationcoalition.or"
mailto:[email protected]://www.foundationcoalition.org/http://www.foundationcoalition.org/mailto:[email protected]
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
17/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Peda"o"ical Approaches
, 4ctive Bearning
, Cooperative Bearning
, 3roblemHased Bearning
, 3ro)ectHased Bearning
, +iscovery Bearning
, InGuiryHased Bearning
, CaseHased Bearning
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
18/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Possi*le Confusion
“A common misconception regarding ‘constructivist’ theoriesof knowing (that existing knowledge is used to build newknowledge) is that teachers should never tell studentsanything directly but, instead, should always allow them to
construct knowledge for themselves. This perspective confusesa theory of pedagogy (teaching) with a theory of knowing.Constructivists assume that knowledge is constructed fromprevious knowledge, irrespective of how one is taught -- evenlistening to a lecture involves active attempts to construct new
knowledge… Nevertheless, there are times, usually afterpeople have first grappled with issues on their own, that‘teaching by telling’ can work extremely well.”
How People Learn, Bransford, John D. et. al. 1999
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
19/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Bour Bundamental Fuestions
, *hat do I %ant people to learn<
, *here are learners starting
from<
, (o% do people learn<
, (o% might I facilitate learning<
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
20/143
Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men
at do "o# ant eole to learn
Lea#ning 0eo#ie&
+o do eolelearn
-e%agogical 0eo#ie&
+o do "o#facilitate
learning
C$##en Reali5
at are learners starting from
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
21/143
Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men
!a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7
: %o#rse s"lla,i
: earning o,ecti$es
: Ta!onomies( e.g.( ;loom
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
22/143
Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men
!a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7
C$##en Reali5
!e#e a#e lea#ne#& &a#ing f#om7
: !isting >noledge( strategies( ,eliefs( etc.
: !erience it ast st#dents
: 'ata a,o#t entering st#dents
: Self&assessment
: Pre&tests -lacement tests( SP?( SSI( etc.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
23/143
Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men
!a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7
C$##en Reali5/ !e#e a#e lea#ne#& &a#ing f#om7
8o6 %o people lea#n7
8o6 %o people clo&e e gap7
ea,io#i&
Cognii,e
Meacognii,e
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
24/143
Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men
!a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7
C$##en Reali5/ !e#e a#e lea#ne#& &a#ing f#om7
+o
do eole
learn
8o6 %o 5o$ faciliae
lea#ning an%lea#ne#&7
-e%agogical 0eo#5
Eample&
Coope#ai,e Lea#ning
-#o.lem"a&e%
Lea#ning
C$##ic$l$m Ineg#aion
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
25/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Bour Fuestions
, *hat do I %ant people to learn< - +xpectations 9ud"ment
, *here are learners starting from<
- 'ata experience
, (o% do people learn< - Eearnin" processes learnin" theory
-Gesearch: neurolo"y psycholo"y co"nitive scienceartificial intelli"ence physics education
, (o% might I facilitate learning< - Teachin" processes peda"o"ical theory
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
26/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Assessment Tetrahedron
, *hat do I %ant people to learn< - +xpectations 9ud"ment
, (o% do people learn<
- Eearnin" processes learnin" theory - Gesearch: neurolo"y psycholo"y co"nitive science
artificial intelli"ence physics education
, (o% might I acGuire data about learning< - Measurement theory
, (o% might I interpret data about learning< - (tatistics modelin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
27/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
'ecidin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
28/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
'ecidin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
29/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
'ecidin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
30/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+volution of (treams of Eearnin"
, $tream 1 Hehaviorist $tream
, $tream Cognitive Information3rocessing2 $tream
, $tream ' 8etacognitive $tream
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
31/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
@nconcerned it
at isaening on
te inside
Stim#li *esonses
$ehaviorist
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
32/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
$ehaviorist
, Bearning as conditioning, Classical conditioning
- Pavlov/s do"s
, perant conditioning - Trainin" do"s !ith a re!ard eventually the re!ard
is no lon"er needed
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
33/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
$ehaviorist
, Bearning as associations among stimuli andresponses
, Instructional implications
- (pecify outcomes in clear o*serva*le terms %no!nas instructional o*9ectives
- 'ivide the tar"et *ehaviors into small easy)to)
achieve steps and present in a lo"ical seHuence - Use mastery as the criterion for pro"ress
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
34/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
35/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Gecallin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
36/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Gecallin" >ames
, (ave you ever been tal&ing to someone and said,>$omeone %as telling me about M and her nameis NN.. I canKt remember.?
, (o%ever, you can remember %hat the person
loo&ed li&e, %here she lives, her occupation, etc., If you imagine a giant concept map %ithin the
brain, it appears that names or other propernames2 are often %ea&ly connected to other
concepts as opposed to common nouns., *ithout intention, instruction on a ne% concept
may create a map in %hich the concept is %ea&lyconnected to other ideas.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
37/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Concept Map
, 4 concept map is a set of nodes thatrepresent concepts connected by a labeled
lin&s that describe a lin& bet%een
concepts.%oncet
%oncet ;'escri,e o concet and
concet ; are related
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
38/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, $tart %ith a subset of the concepts on
the follo%ing page and construct a
concept map that sho%s the conceptsyou have selected and ho% they are
related.
, 5change concept maps and shareinsights
Team +xercise
$uildin" a Concept Map
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
39/143
Beed*ac%
'erivative
Binite +lement Analysis
Inte"ral
Einear Momentum
An"ular Momentum+ner"y
Interest
Mass
Ideal as Ea!
Bic%/s Birst Ea!
Bic%/s (econd Ea!
ectors: 'ot Product
ectors: Cross Product
rdinary 'ifferential +HuationsJirchoff/s olta"e Ea!
(econd Ea! of Thermodynamics
Jirchoff/s Current Ea!
Modelin"
Pro*lem)(olvin"
Borce
hm/s Ea!
Gesistance
Complex >um*ersEo"arithmic Bunction
+lectric Blux
'ecision Theory
'iver"ence
Indirect Cost
Capacitance
$endin" Moment
Beed*ac%
Birst Ea! of Thermodynamics
+ntropy
#eat
+lectric Bield
Ma"netic Bield
Partial 'ifferential +Huations'eterminants
Geturn on Investment
Phasors
$rainstormin"
+xponential Bunction
Conductivity
Chemical Jinetics
(pecific #eat
+lasticityMallea*ility
Plasticity
Gesiliency
Permittivity
Current
+lectric Potential
Curl
Presentation (%ills
'emocracyProfit
'ensity
Molecule
Phase
(hear
Gheolo"y
BreHuency Gesponse
+i"envalue +i"envector
(inusoidal Bunctions
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
40/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
(tudent Perspective
, esearchers at the Aniversity of CaliforniaHer&eley intervie%ed about 09 mechanicalengineering students about their learningeperiences in college.
, 4lthough the researchers %ere a%are of variousintegrated curricula that had been implementedacross the country, they %ere interested in thestudent perspective of integration, as %ell as thepedagogical perspective.
, +ata from the intervie%s tended to support thevalue of lin&ing concepts. For eample, >f the09 students intervie%ed, ;9O commented on thebenefit of lin&ing concepts across disciplines.?
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
41/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
ender 'ifferences
, osser and $andler both report a differencebet%een ho% men and %omen approachproblems.
, 8en tend to handle problems %ith a single
correct or concrete ans%er comfortably, *omen are better able to deal %ith compleproblems and problems that are ambiguous.
, osser asserts that many of the first year coursesare more directed to single correct or concreteans%ers, %hich favor the learning style of men.This is one of the reasons, she believes, that%omen %ith high P34s may leave the ma)or in thefirst year.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
42/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
*elati$el" #ndirectedstr#ct#ring and
restr#ct#ring of
memor"
Stim#li *esonses
Co"nitive Information Processin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
43/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Co"nitive Information Processin"
, Bearning as information processing, 5lements
- Memory: short)term and lon")term
- Processin" - +xecutive
, Questions
- #o! does the learner encode ne! information=
- #o! does the learner or"ani?e represent and lin%
information=
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
44/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Co"nitive Information Processin"
, Bearning as structuring and restructuringmemory
, Instructional implications
- 'irect student/s attention to %ey points - +mphasi?e ho! material is or"ani?ed
- Ma%e information more meanin"ful to learners
- +ncoura"e active chec%in" of understandin"
- Geco"ni?e the limitations of !or%in" memory
- Understand ho! learners mi"ht *e representin" prior
and ne! information
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
45/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Is it going to be on the test
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
46/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
earner&directed
str#ct#ring andrestr#ct#ring of
memor"
Stim#li *esonses
Metaco"nitive
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
47/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Metaco"nitive
, Bearning as learnerdirected structuring ofmemory! reflective learner
, 5lements - Memory: short)term and lon")term
- Processin" - +xecutive
- Metaco"nitive processor
, Questions
-
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
48/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Metaco"nitive
, Bearner thin&s about thin&ing, metacognition.
, Instructional implications
- Promote reflection e.". 9ournals scripts of pro*lemsolvin" processes Co!anD cooperative activitiesafter)action revie!s
- +xplicitly teach learnin" strate"ies in the context of
an en"ineerin" course - Identify s%ills reHuired for pro*lem solvin" desi"n
lifelon" learnin" and develop modules that !illdevelop these s%ills
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
49/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Intelli"ent >ovices
, Anderstanding vs. memoriEing, appropriatemental strategies
, +ifficult vs. easy tet, appropriate readingstrategies
, $olve problems and eamples from a tet inrandom order
, ecogniEing poor understanding, and %illingnessto solicit epert help
, ecogniEing %hen epert eplanations %erema&ing a difference %ith immediate learningproblem ;ron( ..( et. al. -1983 /earning( remem,ering( and #nderstanding in P.+. M#ssen(
ed.( Handbook of Child Psychology( $ol#me 3A Cognitive Development ( ile"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
50/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Co!an/s Teachin" +xamples
, Hridge design - 'esi"n and *uild t!o different *rid"es and "rade
on the lo!er performance desi"n
, 3roblemsolving script - Illustrate script for one type of pro*lem as%
students to develop a script for another type of
pro*lem
%oan( ). -1998 On Becoming an Innovative
niversity !eacher" #eflection in $ction%
;#c>ingamA S*+ and en @ni$ersit"
Press.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
51/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+volution in Co"nitive Eearnin" Theory
, $tage 1 Batin builds mental muscle - (tron" methods matter any su*9ect *uilds stron" methods
, $tage Peneral problem solving approaches
- (tron" methods matter *ut must present appropriate
stron" methods
, $tage ' +omainspecific instruction
-
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
52/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Informed (trate"y Instruction
, Include eplicit descriptions of the generalandor metacognitive strategies
, Include eplicit descriptions of %hen
general andor metacognitive strategies areuseful
, Include eplicit descriptions of %hy general
andor metacognitive strategies are useful.
;r#er( ). -1993 &chools for !hought" $ &cience of
'earning in the Classroom. MIT Press( . 75
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
53/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
McMaster Pro*lem (olvin" Pro"ram
+ach s%ill !or%shop follo!ed a standard pattern:, 'efine the s%ill and clarify its importance
, Put the s%ill into the context of the other s%ills *ein"
developed.
, Bormulate learnin" o*9ectives and "ive students a *rief
pretest.
, $uild the s%ill in a content)independent domain *rid"e the
s%ill into a context)dependent domain and extend the s%ill
, Allo! them to compare their *ehavior !ith tar"et *ehavior
, #elp them develop the tar"et *ehavior throu"h practice and
immediate feed*ac%.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
54/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
McMaster Pro*lem (olvin" Pro"ram
Processing s>ills are ,est de$eloed tro#g a tree&stage rocess itreflection.
1. $il% te s>ill in a stress&free e!ercise so tat st#dents can foc#s on
te mental rocesses ,eing #sed -instead of tin>ing a,o#t ,ot s#,ect&
>noledge and te rocessing s>ill. In reflection st#dents assessed te
degree to ic te" de$eloed te s>ill #sing B#estionnaires ,ased on
learning o,ecti$es.
2. #i%ge tose rocessing s>ills to al" tem in a simlified ro,lem
sit#ation in a target s#,ect domain. *eflect on te rocess #sed to sol$e
te simlified ro,lemC
3. Een% te alication of tose rocess s>ills to an" t"e of ro,lem
sit#ation. Te" reflected on teir #se of te s>ill in teir s#,ect co#rses
and in teir e$er"da" life.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
55/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Geferences
, $ro!n A.E. et. al. 2367D Eearnin" remem*erin" and understandin"0 in P.#. Mussen ed.&andbook of 'hild (sychology volume 7: 'ognitive !evelopment
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
56/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Geferences
, Geiner (lotta Chi Gesnic% N888D>aive Physics Geasonin": A Commitment to (u*stance)$ased Conceptions 'ognition and Instruction 262D N888 2)75
, (chacter '.E. N882D The $even $ins of 0emory) &ow the 0ind 2orgets andemembers $oston: #ou"hton Mifflin Company osser, $.>. 3:??@6 2emaleA2riendly$cience) *pplying Womens $tudies 0ethods and Theories to *ttract $tudents,/lsevier $cience +td
, pp. N)N4, (Huire Earry and +ric Jandel 0emory) 2rom 0ind to 0olecules >e! Oor% (cientific
American Ei*rary 2333, (vinic%i M. 2333D >e! 'irections in Eearnin" and Motivation in M. (vinic%i ed.D
Teaching and +earning on the /dge of the 0illennium) %uilding on What We &ave+earned >e! 'irections for Teachin" and Eearnin" volume 68 e!'irections for Teachin" and Eearnin" no. 46 (an Brancisco: Lossey)$ass 2333, Turns L. Atman C. Adams G. N888D Concept Maps for +n"ineerin" +ducation: A
Co"nitively Motivated Tool (upportin" aried Assessment Bunctions0 I///Transactions on /ducation $pecial Issue on *ssessment May N888
,
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
57/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
58/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
, Course syllabi
, Bearning ob)ectives
, Taonomies of learning
, Competency 8atri
, ubrics
Fuestion Q2:
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
59/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Fuestion Q2:
Information atherin"
Individual 5ercise
ate your understanding of each of the preceding concepts
about establishing your epectations for students.
9 D :o &no%ledge
1 D 4%are of term
D -no% enough to %ant to &no% more' D -no% enough that topic could be s&ipped
in the %or&shop
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
60/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
Course (ylla*us
, 4 course syllabus
lists the topics thatstudents are
epected to learn.
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
61/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
Eearnin" *9ectives
, 4 learning ob)ective describes
epected student behavior under
specified conditions.
- ': Bocus on expected *ehavior:
solve apply etc.
- ': 'escri*e conditions under !hich
the expected *ehavior is to occur. - '>/T: Use !ords such as
understand %no! appreciate value
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
62/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
63/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
64/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
65/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
66/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations:
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
67/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations:
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
68/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations:
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
69/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
roup +xercise
Course syllabi Bearning ob)ectivesTaonomies of learning Competency
8atrices ubrics
For each of your classes, %hich of the above
methods might you use %hen describing
>*hat do I %ant people to learn
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
70/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
#o! do people learn=
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
71/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations and Eearnin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
72/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+xpectations and Eearnin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
73/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Boundation Coalition +xamples
3art II
BC Partner Institutions
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
74/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
BC Partner Institutions
, 4riEona $tate Aniversity 4$A2
, ose(ulman Institute of Technology (IT2
, Teas 4R8 Aniversity T48A2
, Aniversity of 4labama A42
, Aniversity of 8assachusetts+artmouth A8+2
, Aniversity of *isconsin8adison A*2
BC Core Competencies
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
75/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
BC Core Competencies
, 4ctiveCooperative Bearning, $tudents Teams in 5ngineering
, Increasing 3articipation of *omen and
Anderrepresented 8inorities in 5ngineering, Technology5nabled Bearning
, Curricular Integration
, Continuous Improvement through4ssessment and 5valuation
, 8anaging Curricular Change
BC Birst Oear Curricula
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
76/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
BC Birst)Oear Curricula
, A8+ Firstear I83AB$5 - Inte"rated Mathematics Physics Under"raduate Ea*oratory
(cience +n"ineerin"
, 4$A Firstear 5nP4P5
, (IT Firstear IFC$58 - Inte"rated Birst)year Curriculum in (cience +n"ineerin"
and Mathematics
, T48A Firstear :o name
, A4 Firstear TI+5 - Teamin" Inte"ration 'esi"n +n"ineerin"
, A* Firstear BI:-$
IMPUE(+
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
77/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
IMPUE(+
UM' Birst)Oear Cohorts
9
5ntering$tudents
CalculusIIS
Integrated OIndependent O
Calculus
I
Integrated 79O
Independent 1O3recalc,trig, alg
Bin&ed O
Independent 19O
Ineg#ae% G tigtl" interconnected section of ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics and nglis
Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA ngineering(
%alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis
In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses
IMPUE(+ Birst Oear Curriculum
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
78/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
IMPUE(+ Birst)Oear Curriculum
Co$#&e& :all Sp#ing: P"sics for Sci. H ngr. I( II 4 4
: Princiles of Modern %em. I( II 3 3
: Intro. to lied %em. II 0 1
: %ritical riting and *eading I 3 0
: Intro. to lied Sci. H ngr. I( II 3 2
: %alc. for lied Sci. H ngr. I( II 4 4
: IM-;LSE 0oal C#e%i& 1 14: -#og#am Specific (no IM-;LSE) < 3
: 0oal C#e%i& 1 1
University of Massachusetts 'artmouth
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
79/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
University of Massachusetts)'artmouth
, Classroom layout R eGuipment - Gemodeled three classrooms !ith ta*les that seat
four students and have t!o computers 56 seatsD
, $oft%are R 4pplications - Maple and +xcel
- $ased on (tudio Physics model GPID studentsperform physics and chemistry experiments in the
classroom acHuire display and analy?e data, 4udience
- Breshman & sophomore en"ineerin" ma9ors
University of Massachusetts 'artmouth
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
80/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
University of Massachusetts)'artmouth
IMP@S
%lassroom
Freshman 3erformance at A8ass+artmouth
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
81/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Calculus and 3hysics
P e r c e n t a " e @ a i n
IMPUE(+ ) Inte"ration of Math Physics Under"raduate Ea*oratory (cience
+n"lish and +n"ineerin" ) Curriculum.
, (tudents in the IMPUE(+ have a hi"her avera"e 44D on a common calculusexam than the avera"e ND students in the 23336 comparison "roup.
, A hi"her percenta"e of students 3D in the IMPUE(+ pro"ram are stillenrolled in calculus at the final exam !hen compared to the percenta"e ofstudents 4ND in a comparison "roup.
, (tudents in the IMPUE(+ pro"ram demonstrated a lar"er "ain on the BorceConcepts Inventory BCID a national normed physics tests than students inthe 2334 traditional curriculum.
+nA+
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
82/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+nA+
A(U Birst)Oear Cohorts
6995ntering$tudents
CalculusIIS
Bin&ed19O
Independent 19O
CalculusI
Integrated 19O
Bin&ed 9OIndependent 9O
3recalc,
trig, alg
Bin&ed 9O
Independent 9O
Ineg#ae% G tigtl" interconnected section of ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics and nglis
Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis
In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses
Breshman Inte"rated Pro"ram in
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
83/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+n"ineerin" BIP+D
B R35 ) ( R34
, 5nglish ' hrs FR$
, 3hysics 7 hrs FR$
, Calculus 7 hrs FR$
, 'ngineering ( ) hrs *
, Chemistry 7 hrs $
B R34 ) present
, 5nglish ' hrs FR$
, 3hysics 7 hrs FR$
, Calculus 7 hrs FR$
, 'ngineering ( 2 hrs
*+
15 hours/semester 13 hours/semester
Ari?ona (tate University
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
84/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Ari?ona (tate University
Samle
S@
%lassroom
3ro)ects U Integration, 4ctive
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
85/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Bearning, Technology
Enginee#ing/
: 'esign Process: 'esign Tools
: Teamor>
Engli&/
: *etorical S>ills: Presentation Softare
: Peer *e$ie
Calc$l$&/: Mat S>ills: %om#ter lge,ra
-5&ic&/
: Science S>ills: 'ata %at#re: a, TecniB#e
-#o=ec&
Birst (emester Pro9ects
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
86/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Birst (emester Pro9ects
, -inematics
, :e%tonKs Ba%s
, otational 8otion
The Catapult
The Hungee Jump
The Trebuchet
The oller Coaster
(econd (emester Pro9ects
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
87/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
(econd (emester Pro9ects
, 3hysical $ignals
, +ifferential
5Guations
, *ave 8otion
$ensors+etectors
(ydroelectricity
The 4nalog Computer
Traffic Flo%
The $eismometer
Impact
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
88/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Impact
Reenion ttit#des toard F% core ideas
+nA+ Pro"ram ) ption N
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
89/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+nA+ Pro"ram ) ption N
, Three Course Proups chosen from this list - +n"ineerin" 'esi"n 5D
- Chemistry 5D, Chemistry for +n"ineers or eneral Chemistry
- +n"lish Composition 7D - Computer Pro"rammin" 7D
, Pro"rammin" CSSD or Pro"rammin" LavaD or Principles ofComputin"
- University Physics 5D
- Mathematics 7 or 5D, Precalculus or Calculus
- 'i"ital 'esi"n 7D
+nA+ Pro"ram ) ption N
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
90/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
+nA+ Pro"ram ption N
, Fall $emester only
, 1 combinations from list
, $tudent groups of 9
, $tudents epected to ta&e at least one
more course
TAMU Birst)Oear Cohorts
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
91/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
TAMU Birst Oear Cohorts
1699
5ntering$tudents
CalculusIIS
Bin&ed'O
Independent 17O
Calculus
I
Bin&ed 70O
Independent 6O3recalc,trig, alg
Bin&ed 10O
Independent 11O
Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA
ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis
In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses
CAICABA8 3TI:$ F $TA+5:T$
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
92/143
PRECALC
CALCULUS 1
BEYOND
CALCULUS1
>
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
93/143
Calc 2, Phys 2, Engr 2,Chem ( 300
Calc 2, Phys 2, Engr 2
( 200 Calc 2, Engr 2, Chem
( 300
!n"e#en"en$ C%&rses( 300
PRECALC
CALCULUS 1
BEYOND
CALCULUS
>
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
94/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Integration of Courses
, First ear -+n"ineerin"
-Physics -Chemistry
-Calculus
, $econd ear - +n"ineerin" (ciences
, Materials
, Thermodynamics
, (tatics'ynamics
, Mechanics
, Circuits
- Calculus, Apper +ivision
In the old curriculum, students vie%ed thefoundation courses as dis)ointed and
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
95/143
Un)*ers)$y C%re C&rr)c&l&m Re+&)remen$s
C a l c u l u s
Engineering
E n g l i s h
Chemis tr y P h y
s i c s
FI$T 54
F l u i d s
H e a t T r a n s f e r
E l e c t r i c a l
S y s t e m s
S ta tics
Dynamics
S c i e n c e
s
Materials
Math
$5C:+ 54
unrelated.
In the integrated curriculum, course
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
96/143
Un)*ers)$y C%re C&rr)c&l&m Re+&)remen$s
Engineering
Calculus
English
Chemistry
Physics
BIG(T O+AG
Fluids
Heat
Transfer
Electrical
Systems
MaterialsStatics
Dynamics
SciencesMath
(+C>' O+AG
In the integrated curriculum, course
material clearly illustrates ho% these
courses relate to the engineering field.
CA(+ (TU'O TPIC(
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
97/143
'J%J & 'aunching
&tructures in the Offshore (arine
Industry
PPI' MT*IS &
&emiconductor Process
E)uipment*Cathode Base +ield +ailures
%K+' M*TIJ & Common
(issile ,arning &ystem - Optical
&ensor Placement
TL% & 1.etting /atural
.as to (arket 2 &torage !ank
+ire Investigation
LLJ %+MI% & Critical
Care*$ Case &tudy in Problem
&olving and !eam ,ork
%MP? & ,eighing /eed to
Differentiate 0&% Benefits of
&tandardi1ation T@ %T*I% & 1 Over*speed
of $u2iliary !urbines 2 Install
COHP$C 3Compact Hybrid
Particulate Collector4 at Big
Bro5n &team Electric &tation
MT* & Bringing p a
/e5 +$B Plant
Texas A&M University
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
98/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Texas A&M University
, 3hilosophy - Classroom technolo"y must *e scala*le for lar"e classes 288D
, Classroom layout R eGuipment - Gemodeled a*out 28 classrooms for first)year and sophomore courses
- ne computer per t!o students
- 'epartments have constructed their o!n classrooms more are planned
, $oft%are R 4pplications - Microsoft ffice Maple AutoCA' +n". +Huation (olver ++(D Internet
- ++ has students desi"n simulate construct measure and compare
*ehavior of circuits. Class uses >I hard!are and soft!are., 4udience
- Breshman and sophomore en"ineerin" students
- (peciali?ed classes in specific disciplines
CVLB 319: ENGR 112 Team Layout Sections 501 - 503
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
99/143
S c r e e n
S 5 5
S c
r e e
n
indos indos
Podi#m
'oors 'oors
4
1 2
2 1
3
1 1
2 0
2
1 0
1 9
9
1
1 3
1 4
1 7
1 6
2 4
2 3
8 7 6 5
1 5
1 8
2 2
TAMU Eearnin" Communities
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
100/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
TAMU Eearnin" Communities
St#dents o articiate in learning comm#nities -it % are retained in engineering at a
m#c iger rate tan similar st#dents o do not articiate in learning comm#nities
-ito#t % d#ring teir first "ear at HM.
TAMU Eearnin" Communities
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
101/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
TAMU Eearnin" Communities
Te gra sos te ercentage of te st#dents reared to enter soomore engineering co#rses after
comleting a set of reB#ire co#rses called te %ommon ;od" of Knoledge co#rses. t e$er" oint in
time after te st#dents entered Te!as HM @ni$ersit"( te ercentage of st#dents o articiated in
learning comm#nities -it % is greater tan te ercentage of st#dents o did not articiate in
learning comm#nities -ito#t %.
(TU'+>T P+GBGMA>C+ >
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
102/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
(TA>'AG'IK+' T+(T(
O Pain Preater
Test than Traditional
0 5 10 2015
16NStandardiOed %ritical Tin>ing
15NForce %oncet In$entor"
10NMecanics ;aseline Test
10N%alc#l#s %oncet Test
en comared to eB#i$alent st#dents in traditional
engineering rograms( after one "ear( st#dents in te ne
c#rric#l#m erform ,etter on standardiOed tests.
G+'UC+' A+GA+ TIM+
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
103/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
T GA'UATI>
, (tudents in the ne! curriculum sho! a
si"nificant reduction in class repetition
fe!er 's Bs & FsD
, These students complete foundation
course !or% and "raduate a semester
sooner on avera"eD than students !ho
are not involved in the ne! curriculum
TI'+
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
104/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
UA Birst)Oear Cohorts
799 5ntering$tudents
Calculus IIS
Bin&ed O
Independent 1O
Calculus I
Integrated 79O
Bin&ed O
Independent 1O
3recalcalgebraR trig.
Bin&ed 9O
Independent 1O
3recalcalgebra
Bin&ed O
Independent 1O
Ineg#ae% G tigtl" interconnected sections of ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics and nglis
Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis
In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses
TI'+ - #o! are math and
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
105/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
physics different=
Traditional 8ath TI+5 8ath, 5 lectures!ee% no recitation, >o "raded home!or%, Computers not used
, ' lectures%ee&, one hr %ee&lyrecitation
, (ome%or& is graded, Computer soft%are used in
class and recitation -Maple Matla*
Traditional 3hysics TI+5 3hysics
, Computers not used
, Topics not lin%ed to otherclasses
, Computer soft%are used inlecture and lab
-+xcel Maple Interactive Physics, $ome integration %ith 8ath R
5ngineering, $tudio 3hysics $pring 99
TI'+ - #o! is en"ineerin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
106/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
different=
Traditional 5ngineering Fall2 TI+5 5ngineering Fall2, Traditional *oard draftin"
2. hrD, AutoCA' 2. hrD
, $&etching V9. hr2, Intro to engineering and
disciplines, problem solving andcomputer >tools? V1 hr2
, +esign pro)ects V1W hr2 - Geports presentations - Teamin" s%ills
Trad. 5ngineering $pring2 TI+5 5ngineering $pring2
, Bortran pro"rammin"
7 hrD
, 84TB4H programming V
1W hr2, +esign pro)ects V1W hr2
-Geports presentations -Teamin" s%ills
University of Ala*ama
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
107/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
y
,3hilosophy - Technolo"y in classrooms classrooms convenient to students
one ne! classroom in en"ineerin" dorm0D
, Classroom layout R eGuipment - Gemodeled six different classrooms
- Ta*les for four one computer per t!o students
- 'epartments constructin" their o!n classrooms
, $oft%are R 4pplications - Microsoft ffice compilers MATEA$ Maple
, 4udience - Breshman en"ineerin" students
- All students in introductory computin" seHuence
Ala*ama Classroom Eayout
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
108/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
y
, $everal classroom formats eist - All have computers at student des%s instructor
console pro9ection system
- Primarily used for lo!er)division classes
EI>J(
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
109/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
U< Birst)Oear Cohorts
099
5ntering$tudents
CalculusIIS
Bin&ed 'OIndependent '9O
Calculus
I
Bin&ed ;O
Independent 77O3recalc,trig, alg
Bin&ed O
Independent 1O
Linke% G st#dents enrolled in IJKS( common sections of airs of te folloing
co#rsesA ngineering and Tecnical %omm#nication( %alc#l#s and %emistr". @
st#dents a$e man" oter oort#nities to articiate in learning comm#nities
In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses
Goles of (tudent Teams
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
110/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, $tudents %or& to improve their team s&ills, $tudents %or& on team assignments,
including one or more pro)ects
, $tudent teams provide interpersonalsupport for students %hen they are
struggling
, $tudent teams provide nuclei for largercommunities across cluster
Industry Participation ) Ideas
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
111/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
y p
, 4doption of a team of 7 students2 or an entire cluster of /; students2
, Industry teams %ould visit their teamcluster '; times a semester , Industry %ould develop team pro)ects for a '7 %ee& duration based on
>real %orld? problems and the studentKs s&ill level, Industry %ould help in the introduction and evaluation of pro)ects, Industry %ould serve as email consultants to teamclusters
, +eliver course lectures on sub)ects such as ethics, design process,documentation, teaming, andor communications, (ost cluster for a field trip to industry, +evelop a case study to be presented by engineers in the classroom, $end ne% hires bac& to the classroom to discuss perceptions and
realiEations of the %or&place
, $end an eperienced engineering to tal& to the class about their pro)ects, Conduct industry training li&e teaming, conflict management,
communications, etc., Industry do moc& intervie%s, resume %riting, dinner %ith discussion
Industry Participation ) BC
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
112/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
y p
, (ost cluster for a field trip to industry - UA Pilot Pro"ram
, +evelop a case study to be presented
by engineers in the classroom - TAMU Birst)Oear Pro"ram, Conduct industry training li&e diversity,
conflict management, communications - TAMU Birst)Oear: Industry)conducted!or%shops on diversity conflict mana"ement
Gole of Birst)Oear Pro9ects
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
113/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
9
, 3rovide students opportunities to apply anengineering design process
, 3rovide students opportunities to apply
their teams s&ills to an etended pro)ect, 3rovide students opportunities to connect
their mathematics and science concepts to
practice of engineering
BC Pu*lications on Eearnin"
C iti
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
114/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Communities2. Mor"an L. L. Ginehart and L. Broyd ;Industry Case (tudies at Texas
A&M University; (roceedings, 455: *$// *nnual 'onference A(++ Al*uHuerHue >M N5)N6 Lune N882
N. Malav C. et al. Inclusive Eearnin" Communities at Texas A&M
UniversityVA UniHue Model for +n"ineerin"0 Proceedin"s of the Birst
Conference on Creatin" and (ustainin" Eearnin" Communities:
Connections Colla*oration and Crossin" $orders Tampa BE March28-27 2333 ovem*er 2336
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
115/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
p
, Conservation and accountingframe%or& for engineering science
provides the foundation for FC
sophomore curricula.
, (IT $5C
-(ophomore +n"ineerin" Curriculum
, T48A 5ngineering $cience Curriculum
Conservation and Accountin" Brame!or%
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
116/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
,$ystem concept - Identify a system *oundary and surroundin"s
, 5trinsic properties
- Identify the extrinsic propertyiesD to *e trac%ed
, Construct a balance eGuations2
- Include amount of property enterin"leavin" the system
amount "eneratedconsumed !ithin system and amount
accumulated !ithin system
, Conserved properties
- >either "enerated nor consumed !ithin any system e.".
massener"y char"e linear momentum
G#IT (ophomore +n"ineerin"
C i l
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
117/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Curriculum
'ifferentialB#ations
and Matri!
lge,ra I
'ifferentialB#ations
and Matri!
lge,ra II
ngineering
Statistics I
%onser$ation
and
cco#ntingPrinciles
Fl#id H Termal
S"stems
lectrical S"stems
Mecanical S"stems
nal"sis
and 'esign
ofngineering
S"stems
G#IT (+C (tudent Performance
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
118/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Te gras on te leftcomare te erformance
of st#dents in te
soomore engineering
c#rric#l#m -S204 it
te erformance of
st#dents in d"namics. Te
comarison is ,ased on te
m#ltile coice B#estions
#sed on te common
d"namics final e!am. n
most B#estions te S204st#dents scored as ell or
,etter tan st#dents in
d"namics.
G#IT (+C (tudent Performance
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
119/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
-#o. ? 199@"9 199"9
SECESBo#t ro,lems ere designed to ,e longer( more diffic#lt and
reB#ired m#ltile stes and concets. Te st#dents in te S% c#rric#l#m did
significantl" ,etter tan tose ta>ing te traditional d"namics co#rse.
TAMU +n"ineerin" (cience Curriculum
Course Components
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
120/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Course Components
5ach engineering ma)or chooses sophomorelevel courses from the follo%ing five courses
based on the conservation and accounting
frame%or& C4F2.
- +n"ineerin" Mechanics usin" CABD
- +n"ineerin" Thermodynamics usin" CABD
- Introduction to Materials usin" CABD
- Continuum Mechanics usin" CABD
- +lectrical (ystems usin" CABD
TAMU +n"ineerin" (cience Curriculum
(tudent Performance
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
121/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
(tudent Performance
Core Proup Comparison Proup
4ver. $td. +ev. 4ver. $td. +ev.
$tatics 9.; 9.9; 9.06 9.9;
+ynamics 9.1 9.96 9.' 9.96
Thermodynamics 9.;; 9.90 9.0 9.90
Enginee#ing Science Acie,emen Eaminaion&
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
122/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
ActiveCooperative Eearnin"
vervie!
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
123/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, *hat is 4CB<, *hy 4CB<
, *hat does 4CB involve<
- Components of ACE, 4CB $trategies
, Constructing 4CB class eercises
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
124/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, 4ctive Bearning - When using active learning students are
engaged in more activities than Cust
listening. They are involved in dialog,debate, writing, and problem solving, as
well as higherAorder thinking, e.g., analysis,
synthesis, evaluation.
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
125/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, Cooperative Bearning - 'ooperative learning is the instructional use of
small groups so that students work together to
maximiDe their own and each otherEs learning.
2ive essential components):. 'lear, positive interdependence between students
4. 2aceAtoAface interaction
F. Individual accountability
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
126/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Team 5ercise, minutes2 $can through the handout on
the introduction to 4CB
, minutes2 $hare Guestions and insights
%ithin the team
, minutes2 Questions and 4ns%ers
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
127/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
128/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, First, $pringer, $tanne, and +onovan published a metaanalysis X1Y of thirtynine
research studies conducted since 1/69 on effectiveness of small group learning inscience, mathematics, engineering and technology X
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
129/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, 3ositive Interdependence Team membersmust rely on each other to accomplish
goals.
, Individual 4ccountability 8embers are
held accountable for doing their share of
the %or&, as %ell as mastering all material.
ACE +lements continuedD
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
130/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, Proup 3rocessing Teams periodicallyreflect on %hat they do %ell as a team, %hat
they could improve, and %hat they might
need to do differently.
, FacetoFace Interaction $ome or all %or&
should be done by members %or&ing
together.
ACE +lements continuedD
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
131/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, $ocial $&ills Team members practice andreceive instruction in leadership, decision
ma&ing, communication, and conflict
management.
Cooperative Eearnin" (trate"ies
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
132/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, Think (air $hare
, Think *loud (aired (roblem $olving
, #ig$aw
, /nhanced +ecture
, 0any more techniGues exist
Cooperative Eearnin" (trate"ies
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
133/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Thin& D 3air $hare
, 4pplied earlier
Thin& 4loud
3aired 3roblem $olving
, +escribe briefly
Cooperative Eearnin" (trate"ies
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
134/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
Jig$a%
, Ase %ith material that can
be bro&en into
independent parts.
, For each part select a
member from each team
to be the team epert
, 5pert groups meet and
develop lesson on part.
, 5perts present the lesson
to the rest of the team.
5nhanced Becture
, Introductory activity
, Becturette 191minutes2
, 4ctivity minutes2, Becturette 191
minutes2
, 4ctivity minutes2
, Becturette 191minutes2
, Closing activity
Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
135/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, *elder, -$M$ and .rent, -$ /2001 *s$ $ %rou!wor in &istance 4earning,5
Che"$ 'ngr$ 'ducation, 36/2, 102(103,htt!788www$ncsu$edu8felder(!ublic8Colu"ns8*s(3$ht"l
, Mae it clear to the students why grou!wor is being re9uired$ - (articularly important for students in distance courses, whose learning preferences tend
to favor working independently.
, *or" s"all tea"s that are balanced in nowledge and sills$
- Teams of three or four are large enough to provide adeGuate diversity of opinions,experiences, and learning styles, but not so large that individual members cansuccessfully hide.
- Hroups of all strong students or all weak students should be avoided. If possible, at leastone member of each team should have experience with the computer tools to be used tocomplete the assignments.
, %ive clear directions regarding both the assign"ents and the co""unication
tools$ - >irtual groups may find it particularly frustrating to have to decipher muddy directions
about what to do and how to do it, and their frustration could hurt both their motivationand their performance. Hive short preliminary assignments that reGuire the teammembers to demonstrate their mastery of the communication software.
Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"
http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/FAQs-3.htmlhttp://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/FAQs-3.html
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
136/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, Monitor tea" !rogress and be available to consult when tea"s are having !roble"s$
- %e proactive against procrastination, which could be worse when teams are separated. - *ppoint team coordinators whose responsibilities are to keep their teams on task and to report on
progress and problems at regular intervals. (eriodically rotate this role among team members.
- (rompt groups that are not meeting freGuently enough and offer guidance if they appear to be stuck.
, ntervene when necessary to hel! tea"s overco"e inter!ersonal !roble"s$
- $uggest strategies like active listening to resolve conflicts. 3/ach side makes its case, and the other
side has to repeat that case to the first sideEs satisfaction without attempting to counter it. When both
sides have had their say, a resolution is sought.6
- 'onsider conducting such sessions by videoconference or telephone rather than asynchronously.
, Collect !eer ratings of individual citi#enshi! and use the ratings to ad:ust the tea"
assign"ent grades$
- ewarding exceptional team members and penaliDing nonAcontributors helps avoid many of the
conflicts and resentments that often occur when students work on group proCects. * procedure for
collecting ratings and using them to adCust team grades is described in the literature., ntici!ate !roble"s and get hel! when necessary$
Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
137/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, 8illis, H.J. >8anagingZand 8otivatingLZ+istance Bearning Proup
4ctivities,? http%%%.tltgroup.orggilbertmillis.htm, Petting $et Ap
- As% yourself %ey Huestions a*out the proposed "roup activity
- $e certain that "roup activities further the course o*9ectives
- +xplain to students the nature and value of the proposed activities - $e certain to "ive clear instructions.
, 3rovide students %ith a sense of closure.
, Forming Teams
- Jeep the "roup si?e small
- Unless there is a compellin" reason to do other!ise aim for
hetero"eneous "roups
- To ensure hetero"eneity form teacher)assi"ned teams.
Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"
http://www.tltgroup.org/gilbert/millis.htmhttp://www.tltgroup.org/gilbert/millis.htm
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
138/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, Creating Team Bearning 5nvironments
- Jeep "roups to"ether lon" enou"h to esta*lish positive !or%in" relationships - Allo! time for team *uildin"
- +ncoura"e students to monitor as you !ill "roup processin"
- +ncoura"e students to practice and reinforce positive social s%ills.
, Ase Classroom 4ssessment TechniGues C4Ts2 to determine student
progress., Cooperative Bearning 4ctivity $tructure
- (tructure activities to promote positive interdependence
- Promote individual accounta*ility
, $et up a clear, noncompetitive, criterionreferenced grading scheme.
, 4nticipate problems and donKt be afraid to see& constructive help.
, emember that the research on deep learning is uneGuivocal. To reach your
intended educational outcomes, you must provide students %ith
opportunities for interactions and for active learning. These should occur in
carefully structured, seGuenced activities that are freGuently assessed.
Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
139/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, *est, 8.B, and Buet&ehans, B. >Ten Preat Tips for
Facilitating @irtual Bearning Teams,?http%%%.psdcorp.comdislearn.htm
, Tip #1 (elp team members manage >cyberstress? byhelping them feel connected to the facilitator and otherteam members.
, Tip # 3lan freGuent email prompts to help team membersovercome procrastination.
, Tip #' D 3rovide a variety of tools to support the differentphases of problem solving.
, Tip #7 D 4ssist team members %hen they struggle %ithachieving consensus.
, Tip # 4ssemble teams strategically based on tas& andtalent.
Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"
http://www.psdcorp.com/dislearn.htmhttp://www.psdcorp.com/dislearn.htm
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
140/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, Tip #; 3rovide timely and meaningful feedbac&.
, Tip # 0 $caffold topical discussions using a
threaded discussion asynchronous2 tool.
, Tip #6 5ncourage elaboration through
Guestioning and hypertet lin&ing., Tip #/ D +iscourage )udgment, criticism and
personal attac&s.
, Tip #19 D Intervene to highlight areas of commonground among conflicting team members.
Team +xercise
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
141/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, 3ic& a class in your freshman seGuence, +esign t%o different 4CB student eercises
for this class
-Birst exercise should ta%e no more than minutestotal for all partsD
- (econd exercise should ta%e approximately 2
minutes for the students to complete and report out
-e!ort out to the grou!
ACE Geferences
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
142/143
University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut
, http%%%.clcrc.com, http%%%.activelearningsite.com
, http%%%.ncsu.eduunityloc&ersusersf
felderpublic8F.html, httpfoundationcoalition.org
, http%%%.psu.educeltclbib.html
, http%%%.%cer.%isc.edunisecl1
(ummary:
#o! do I %no! if it is ACE=
-
8/20/2019 2003new Haven
143/143
33ositive Interdependence IIndividual 4ccountability
PProup 3rocessing$$ocial $&ills
FFaceToFace Interaction
#o! do I %no! if it is ACE=