2003new Haven

download 2003new Haven

of 55

Transcript of 2003new Haven

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    1/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Principles for Classroom and

    Curricular Innovation

    Jeff Froyd, Texas A&M [email protected]

    http:!!!.foundationcoalition.or"

    mailto:[email protected]://www.foundationcoalition.org/http://www.foundationcoalition.org/mailto:[email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    2/143

    "There is an incredible

    evolution of learning oreducation as almost the

    sole source of competitive

    advantage in an economy

    that has changed so much."

    #o!ard $loc% Mana"in" 'irector 

    $anc of America (ecurities

     An investment)*an% and *ro%era"e

    su*sidiary of $an% of America.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    3/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"es in +n"ineerin" +ducation

    , Challenges

     -Challen"e of lifelon" learnin"

     -Challen"e of pro*lem solvin" -Challen"e of en"ineerin" desi"n

     -Challen"e of transfer 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    4/143

    LASSI SCALEENGR111

    (Mean)CVEN349

    (Mean)Significance*

    Skill Componen

    Information Processing 60.68 60.29 0.930Test Strategies 64.33 63.27 0.794

    Selecting Main Ideas 55.18 59.29 0.342

    !ill Componen

    n!iet" 60.52 67.12 0.147

    ttit#de 42.47 34.56 0.080

    Moti$ation 63.30 59.29 0.397

    Self"#eg$laion Componen

    %oncentration 61.31 54.56 0.144

    Self&testing 52.47 37.92 0.006

    St#d" ids 60.24 45.04 0.005

    Time Management 55.23 47.65 0.134

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    5/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"

    'espite individual professors/ dedication and efforts to developpro*lem solvin" s%ill "eneral pro*lem solvin" s%ill0 !as notdeveloped in the four years in our under"raduate pro"ram.(tudents "raduated sho!in" the same ina*ility that they had!hen they started the pro"ram. (ome could not create

    hypotheses1 some misread pro*lem statements. 'urin" the four)year under"raduate en"ineerin" pro"ram studied 2345)2346the students had !or%ed over 7888 home!or% pro*lems theyhad o*served a*out 2888 sample solutions *ein" !or%ed on the*oard *y either the teacher or *y peers and they had !or%ed

    many open)ended pro*lems. In other !ords they sho!ed noimprovement in pro*lem solvin" s%ills despite the *est intentionsof their instructors.0

    !oo%&' e al (199) +e,eloping -#o.lem Sol,ing Skill&/ 0e

    McMa&e# -#o.lem Sol,ing -#og#am'2 o$#nal of Enginee#ing E%$caion'

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    6/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"

    , Ineffective approach #1. give the studentsopenended problems to solve! This, we

    now see, is ineffective because the

    students get little feedbac about the !rocess ste!s, they tend to reinforce bad

    habits, they do not now what !rocesses

    they should be using and they resort totrying to collect sa"!le solutions and

    "atch !ast "e"ori#ed sa"!le solutions to

    new !roble" situations$

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    7/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"

    , Ineffective approach #  $ho% them ho% yousolve problems by %or&ing many problems on theboard and handing out many sample solutions - This, we now see, is ineffective because teachers know too

    much. Teachers demonstrate "exercise solving". Teachersdo not make mistakes; they do not struggle to figure outwhat the problem really is. They work forwards; notbackwards from the goal. They do not demonstrate the"problem solving" process; they demonstrate the "exercise

    solving" process. If they did demonstrate "problem solving"with all its mistakes and trials, the students would brand theteacher as incompetent. We know; we tried

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    8/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"

    , Ineffective approach #' (ave studentssolve problems on the board

     - !ifferent students use different approaches to

    solving problems; what works for one wont workfor others. When we used this method as a

    research tool, the students reported "we learned

    nothing to help us solve problems by watching #im,

    $ue and %rad solve those problems"  

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    9/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Pro*lem (olvin"

    , Through four research pro)ects %e identified %hyand ho% these and other teaching methods failed

    to develop process s&ills and %hich methods

    %ere successful in developing the s&ills, *oods, +.., J.+. *right, T.*. (offman, .-. $%artman and I.+. +oig 1/02 "Teaching

    3roblem $olving $&ills," 4nnals of 5ngineering 5ducation, 1, 1, '67'.

    , *oods, +.. et al. 1/0/2 "8a)or Challenges to Teaching 3roblem $olving" 4nnals of

    5ngineering 5ducation, 09, :o. ' p. 00 to 67, 1/0/ and "; Challenges to Teaching

    3roblem $olving" C(58 1' :e%s no. 1 1/62.

    , *oods, +.. 1//'a2 "3roblem solving %here are %e no%

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    10/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of +n"ineerin" 'esi"n

    The literature is filled !ith positive comments from studentsinstructors and industrial sponsors !ho have participated in

    capstone desi"n courses. The vast ma9ority of participants feel

    that the course *enefited all involved.

    The nature of capstone desi"n courses ho!ever often leads to apurely sub)ective evaluation %ith little or no >hard evidence?

    of actual benefits. $orn for example does not attempt to prove

    the value of senior level desi"n courses. #e simply states that he

    is convinced from his experiences that such courses are

    valua*le. ther educators have similar feelin"s0 as to the

    relative costs and *enefits of capstone desi"n courses.

    '#tson( .).( Todd( *.+.( Magle,"( S.P.( Sorensen( %.'.( -1997 / *e$ie of iterat#re

    on Teacing ngineering 'esign Tro#g Proect&riented %astone %o#rses. Journal of

     Engineering Education

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    11/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Transfer 

    esearches posed this problem to people.

    ;(uppose you are a doctor faced !ith a patient !ho has amali"nant tumor in his stomach. It is impossi*le to operate onthe patient *ut unless the tumor is destroyed the patient !ill die.

    There is a %ind of ray that can *e used to destroy the tumor. Ifthe rays reach the tumor all at once at a sufficiently hi"h intensitythe tumor !ill *e destroyed. Unfortunately at this intensity thehealthy tissue that the rays pass throu"h on the !ay to the tumor!ill also *e destroyed. At lo!er intensities the rays are harmless

    to healthy tissue *ut they !ill not affect the tumor either.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    12/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Transfer 

    Consider the follo%ing story

    ;A small country !as ruled from a stron" fortress *y a dictator. The fortress!as situated in the middle of the country surrounded *y farms and villa"es.Many roads led to the fortress throu"h the countryside. A re*el "eneral vo!edto capture the fortress. The "eneral %ne! that an attac% *y his entire army!ould capture the fortress. #e "athered his army at the head of one of theroads ready to launch a full)scale direct attac%. #o!ever the "eneral thenlearned that the dictator had planted mines on each of the roads. The mines!ere set so that small *odies of men could pass over them safely since thedictator need to move his troops and !or%ers to and from the fortress.#o!ever any lar"e force !ould detonate the mines. >ot only !ould this *lo!up the road *ut it !ould also destroy many nei"h*orin" villa"es. It therefore

    seemed impossi*le to capture the fortress. #o!ever the "eneral devised asimple plan. #e divided his army into small "roups and dispatched each"roup to the head of a different road.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    13/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Challen"e of Transfer 

    ,  After the su*9ects read and summari?ed this storythey !ere as%ed to solve the tumor pro*lem underthe "uise of a separate experiment.

    , iven the clear analo"y you mi"ht thin% that

    performance !ould *e near ceilin". (urprisin"ly only78 of the su*9ects offered a conver"ence solution.

    , Moreover !hen these same su*9ects !ere "iven thesu""estion that they should use the eneral story

    68 provided a conver"ence solution., This findin" demonstrates that half the su*9ects could

    apply the eneral story to the tumor pro*lem !henthey !ere instructed to *ut did not do so on their o!n.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    14/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Bocusin" Activity 6 minutesD

    , I:+I@I+A4BB D use ' minutes to %riteyour description of learning, %hat it is,

    %hat it loo&s li&e, ho% you might recogniEe

    %hen it has occurred, etc., 4$ 4 34I D use minutes to discuss

    descriptions %ith someone sitting net to

    you. If you have additional time, develop aconsensus description of learning.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    15/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Bocusin" Activity

    , +ifferent %ays to describe the same thing, $upported by partner 

    , Bearning is a process, highly mental, &ey to creativity and using our eperience

    , Bearning and &no%ledge is applied, specifically and the usefulness of %hat %aslearned

    , Bearning is process of acGuiring of &no%ledge and s&ills and there are different

    levels, $tarted %ith process of acGuiring basic level s&ills and understanding the

    processes and using &no%ledge and s&ills to solve problems

    , elationsihip bet%een seeing big picture and incremental s&ills, transferringbet%een the t%o

    , *e have a narro% perspective based on similar bac&grounds

    , $atisfaction %ith life, learning can be satisfying, 4pproach as problem solving, partner brought in survival, lifelong learning

    different perspectives2

    , 8ore than )ust engineering learning

    , +ifferent general approach vs. more detailed approach

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    16/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Model for Eearnin" and Teachin"

    Jeff Froyd, Texas A&M University

    [email protected]

    http:!!!.foundationcoalition.or"

    mailto:[email protected]://www.foundationcoalition.org/http://www.foundationcoalition.org/mailto:[email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    17/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Peda"o"ical Approaches

    , 4ctive Bearning

    , Cooperative Bearning

    , 3roblemHased Bearning

    , 3ro)ectHased Bearning

    , +iscovery Bearning

    , InGuiryHased Bearning

    , CaseHased Bearning

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    18/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Possi*le Confusion

    “A common misconception regarding ‘constructivist’ theoriesof knowing (that existing knowledge is used to build newknowledge) is that teachers should never tell studentsanything directly but, instead, should always allow them to

    construct knowledge for themselves. This perspective confusesa theory of pedagogy (teaching) with a theory of knowing.Constructivists assume that knowledge is constructed fromprevious knowledge, irrespective of how one is taught -- evenlistening to a lecture involves active attempts to construct new

    knowledge… Nevertheless, there are times, usually afterpeople have first grappled with issues on their own, that‘teaching by telling’ can work extremely well.”

     How People Learn, Bransford, John D. et. al. 1999

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    19/143University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Bour Bundamental Fuestions

    , *hat do I %ant people to learn<

    , *here are learners starting

    from<

    , (o% do people learn<

    , (o% might I facilitate learning<

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    20/143

    Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men

    at do "o# ant eole to learn

    Lea#ning 0eo#ie&

    +o do eolelearn

    -e%agogical 0eo#ie&

    +o do "o#facilitate

    learning

    C$##en Reali5

    at are learners starting from

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    21/143

    Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men

    !a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7

    : %o#rse s"lla,i

    : earning o,ecti$es

    : Ta!onomies( e.g.( ;loom

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    22/143

    Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men

    !a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7

    C$##en Reali5

    !e#e a#e lea#ne#& &a#ing f#om7

    : !isting >noledge( strategies( ,eliefs( etc.

    : !erience it ast st#dents

    : 'ata a,o#t entering st#dents

    : Self&assessment

    : Pre&tests -lacement tests( SP?( SSI( etc.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    23/143

    Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men

    !a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7

    C$##en Reali5/ !e#e a#e lea#ne#& &a#ing f#om7

    8o6 %o people lea#n7

    8o6 %o people clo&e e gap7

    ea,io#i&

    Cognii,e

    Meacognii,e

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    24/143

    Epecaion& an% A&&e&&men

    !a %o 5o$ 6an people o lea#n7

    C$##en Reali5/ !e#e a#e lea#ne#& &a#ing f#om7

    +o

    do eole

    learn

    8o6 %o 5o$ faciliae

    lea#ning an%lea#ne#&7

    -e%agogical 0eo#5

    Eample&

    Coope#ai,e Lea#ning

    -#o.lem"a&e%

    Lea#ning

    C$##ic$l$m Ineg#aion

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    25/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Bour Fuestions

    , *hat do I %ant people to learn< - +xpectations 9ud"ment

    , *here are learners starting from<

     - 'ata experience

    , (o% do people learn< - Eearnin" processes learnin" theory

     -Gesearch: neurolo"y psycholo"y co"nitive scienceartificial intelli"ence physics education

    , (o% might I facilitate learning< - Teachin" processes peda"o"ical theory

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    26/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

     Assessment Tetrahedron

    , *hat do I %ant people to learn< - +xpectations 9ud"ment

    , (o% do people learn<

     - Eearnin" processes learnin" theory - Gesearch: neurolo"y psycholo"y co"nitive science

    artificial intelli"ence physics education

    , (o% might I acGuire data about learning< - Measurement theory

    , (o% might I interpret data about learning< - (tatistics modelin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    27/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    'ecidin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    28/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    'ecidin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    29/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    'ecidin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    30/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +volution of (treams of Eearnin"

    , $tream 1 Hehaviorist $tream

    , $tream Cognitive Information3rocessing2 $tream

    , $tream ' 8etacognitive $tream

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    31/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    @nconcerned it

    at isaening on

    te inside

    Stim#li *esonses

    $ehaviorist

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    32/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    $ehaviorist

    , Bearning as conditioning, Classical conditioning

     - Pavlov/s do"s

    , perant conditioning - Trainin" do"s !ith a re!ard eventually the re!ard

    is no lon"er needed

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    33/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    $ehaviorist

    , Bearning as associations among stimuli andresponses

    , Instructional implications

     - (pecify outcomes in clear o*serva*le terms %no!nas instructional o*9ectives

     - 'ivide the tar"et *ehaviors into small easy)to)

    achieve steps and present in a lo"ical seHuence - Use mastery as the criterion for pro"ress

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    34/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    35/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Gecallin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    36/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Gecallin" >ames

    , (ave you ever been tal&ing to someone and said,>$omeone %as telling me about M and her nameis NN.. I canKt remember.?

    , (o%ever, you can remember %hat the person

    loo&ed li&e, %here she lives, her occupation, etc., If you imagine a giant concept map %ithin the

    brain, it appears that names or other propernames2 are often %ea&ly connected to other

    concepts as opposed to common nouns., *ithout intention, instruction on a ne% concept

    may create a map in %hich the concept is %ea&lyconnected to other ideas.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    37/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Concept Map

    , 4 concept map is a set of nodes thatrepresent concepts connected by a labeled

    lin&s that describe a lin& bet%een

    concepts.%oncet

    %oncet ;'escri,e o concet and

    concet ; are related

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    38/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , $tart %ith a subset of the concepts on

    the follo%ing page and construct a

    concept map that sho%s the conceptsyou have selected and ho% they are

    related.

    , 5change concept maps and shareinsights

    Team +xercise

    $uildin" a Concept Map

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    39/143

    Beed*ac%

    'erivative

    Binite +lement Analysis

    Inte"ral

    Einear Momentum

     An"ular Momentum+ner"y

    Interest

    Mass

    Ideal as Ea!

    Bic%/s Birst Ea!

    Bic%/s (econd Ea!

    ectors: 'ot Product

    ectors: Cross Product

    rdinary 'ifferential +HuationsJirchoff/s olta"e Ea!

    (econd Ea! of Thermodynamics

    Jirchoff/s Current Ea!

    Modelin"

    Pro*lem)(olvin"

    Borce

    hm/s Ea!

    Gesistance

    Complex >um*ersEo"arithmic Bunction

    +lectric Blux

    'ecision Theory

    'iver"ence

    Indirect Cost

    Capacitance

    $endin" Moment

    Beed*ac%

    Birst Ea! of Thermodynamics

    +ntropy

    #eat

    +lectric Bield

    Ma"netic Bield

    Partial 'ifferential +Huations'eterminants

    Geturn on Investment

    Phasors

    $rainstormin"

    +xponential Bunction

    Conductivity

    Chemical Jinetics

    (pecific #eat

    +lasticityMallea*ility

    Plasticity

    Gesiliency

    Permittivity

    Current

    +lectric Potential

    Curl

    Presentation (%ills

    'emocracyProfit

    'ensity

    Molecule

    Phase

    (hear 

    Gheolo"y

    BreHuency Gesponse

    +i"envalue +i"envector 

    (inusoidal Bunctions

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    40/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    (tudent Perspective

    , esearchers at the Aniversity of CaliforniaHer&eley intervie%ed about 09 mechanicalengineering students about their learningeperiences in college.

    , 4lthough the researchers %ere a%are of variousintegrated curricula that had been implementedacross the country, they %ere interested in thestudent perspective of integration, as %ell as thepedagogical perspective.

    , +ata from the intervie%s tended to support thevalue of lin&ing concepts. For eample, >f the09 students intervie%ed, ;9O commented on thebenefit of lin&ing concepts across disciplines.?

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    41/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    ender 'ifferences

    , osser and $andler both report a differencebet%een ho% men and %omen approachproblems.

    , 8en tend to handle problems %ith a single

    correct or concrete ans%er comfortably, *omen are better able to deal %ith compleproblems and problems that are ambiguous.

    , osser asserts that many of the first year coursesare more directed to single correct or concreteans%ers, %hich favor the learning style of men.This is one of the reasons, she believes, that%omen %ith high P34s may leave the ma)or in thefirst year.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    42/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    *elati$el" #ndirectedstr#ct#ring and

    restr#ct#ring of 

    memor"

    Stim#li *esonses

    Co"nitive Information Processin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    43/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Co"nitive Information Processin"

    , Bearning as information processing, 5lements

     - Memory: short)term and lon")term

     - Processin" - +xecutive

    , Questions

     - #o! does the learner encode ne! information=

     - #o! does the learner or"ani?e represent and lin%

    information=

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    44/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Co"nitive Information Processin"

    , Bearning as structuring and restructuringmemory

    , Instructional implications

     - 'irect student/s attention to %ey points - +mphasi?e ho! material is or"ani?ed

     - Ma%e information more meanin"ful to learners

     - +ncoura"e active chec%in" of understandin"

     - Geco"ni?e the limitations of !or%in" memory

     - Understand ho! learners mi"ht *e representin" prior

    and ne! information

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    45/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Is it going to be on the test

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    46/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    earner&directed

    str#ct#ring andrestr#ct#ring of

    memor"

    Stim#li *esonses

    Metaco"nitive

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    47/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Metaco"nitive

    , Bearning as learnerdirected structuring ofmemory! reflective learner 

    , 5lements - Memory: short)term and lon")term

     - Processin" - +xecutive

     - Metaco"nitive processor 

    , Questions

     -

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    48/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Metaco"nitive

    , Bearner thin&s about thin&ing, metacognition.

    , Instructional implications

     - Promote reflection e.". 9ournals scripts of pro*lemsolvin" processes Co!anD cooperative activitiesafter)action revie!s

     - +xplicitly teach learnin" strate"ies in the context of

    an en"ineerin" course - Identify s%ills reHuired for pro*lem solvin" desi"n

    lifelon" learnin" and develop modules that !illdevelop these s%ills

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    49/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Intelli"ent >ovices

    , Anderstanding vs. memoriEing, appropriatemental strategies

    , +ifficult vs. easy tet, appropriate readingstrategies

    , $olve problems and eamples from a tet inrandom order 

    , ecogniEing poor understanding, and %illingnessto solicit epert help

    , ecogniEing %hen epert eplanations %erema&ing a difference %ith immediate learningproblem ;ron( ..( et. al. -1983 /earning( remem,ering( and #nderstanding in P.+. M#ssen(

    ed.( Handbook of Child Psychology( $ol#me 3A Cognitive Development ( ile"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    50/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Co!an/s Teachin" +xamples

    , Hridge design - 'esi"n and *uild t!o different *rid"es and "rade

    on the lo!er performance desi"n

    , 3roblemsolving script - Illustrate script for one type of pro*lem as%

    students to develop a script for another type of

    pro*lem

    %oan( ). -1998 On Becoming an Innovative

    niversity !eacher" #eflection in $ction%

    ;#c>ingamA S*+ and en @ni$ersit"

    Press.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    51/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +volution in Co"nitive Eearnin" Theory

    , $tage 1 Batin builds mental muscle - (tron" methods matter any su*9ect *uilds stron" methods

    , $tage Peneral problem solving approaches

     - (tron" methods matter *ut must present appropriate

    stron" methods

    , $tage ' +omainspecific instruction

     -

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    52/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Informed (trate"y Instruction

    , Include eplicit descriptions of the generalandor metacognitive strategies

    , Include eplicit descriptions of %hen 

    general andor metacognitive strategies areuseful

    , Include eplicit descriptions of %hy general

    andor metacognitive strategies are useful.

    ;r#er( ). -1993 &chools for !hought" $ &cience of

     'earning in the Classroom. MIT Press( . 75

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    53/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    McMaster Pro*lem (olvin" Pro"ram

    +ach s%ill !or%shop follo!ed a standard pattern:, 'efine the s%ill and clarify its importance

    , Put the s%ill into the context of the other s%ills *ein"

    developed.

    , Bormulate learnin" o*9ectives and "ive students a *rief

    pretest.

    , $uild the s%ill in a content)independent domain *rid"e the

    s%ill into a context)dependent domain and extend the s%ill

    , Allo! them to compare their *ehavior !ith tar"et *ehavior 

    , #elp them develop the tar"et *ehavior throu"h practice and

    immediate feed*ac%.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    54/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    McMaster Pro*lem (olvin" Pro"ram

    Processing s>ills are ,est de$eloed tro#g a tree&stage rocess itreflection.

    1. $il% te s>ill in a stress&free e!ercise so tat st#dents can foc#s on

    te mental rocesses ,eing #sed -instead of tin>ing a,o#t ,ot s#,ect&

    >noledge and te rocessing s>ill. In reflection st#dents assessed te

    degree to ic te" de$eloed te s>ill #sing B#estionnaires ,ased on

    learning o,ecti$es.

    2. #i%ge tose rocessing s>ills to al" tem in a simlified ro,lem

    sit#ation in a target s#,ect domain. *eflect on te rocess #sed to sol$e

    te simlified ro,lemC

    3. Een% te alication of tose rocess s>ills to an" t"e of ro,lem

    sit#ation. Te" reflected on teir #se of te s>ill in teir s#,ect co#rses

    and in teir e$er"da" life.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    55/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Geferences

    , $ro!n A.E. et. al. 2367D Eearnin" remem*erin" and understandin"0 in P.#. Mussen ed.&andbook of 'hild (sychology  volume 7: 'ognitive !evelopment 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    56/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Geferences

    , Geiner (lotta Chi Gesnic% N888D>aive Physics Geasonin": A Commitment to (u*stance)$ased Conceptions 'ognition and Instruction 262D N888 2)75

    , (chacter '.E. N882D The $even $ins of 0emory) &ow the 0ind 2orgets andemembers $oston: #ou"hton Mifflin Company osser, $.>. 3:??@6 2emaleA2riendly$cience) *pplying Womens $tudies 0ethods and Theories to *ttract $tudents,/lsevier $cience +td  

    , pp. N)N4, (Huire Earry and +ric Jandel 0emory) 2rom 0ind to 0olecules >e! Oor% (cientific

     American Ei*rary 2333, (vinic%i M. 2333D >e! 'irections in Eearnin" and Motivation in M. (vinic%i ed.D

    Teaching and +earning on the /dge of the 0illennium) %uilding on What We &ave+earned  >e! 'irections for Teachin" and Eearnin" volume 68 e!'irections for Teachin" and Eearnin" no. 46 (an Brancisco: Lossey)$ass 2333, Turns L. Atman C. Adams G. N888D Concept Maps for +n"ineerin" +ducation: A

    Co"nitively Motivated Tool (upportin" aried Assessment Bunctions0 I///Transactions on /ducation $pecial Issue on *ssessment  May N888

    ,

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    57/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    58/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

    , Course syllabi

    , Bearning ob)ectives

    , Taonomies of learning

    , Competency 8atri

    , ubrics

    Fuestion Q2:

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    59/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Fuestion Q2:

    Information atherin"

    Individual 5ercise

    ate your understanding of each of the preceding concepts

    about establishing your epectations for students.

    9 D :o &no%ledge

    1 D 4%are of term

    D -no% enough to %ant to &no% more' D -no% enough that topic could be s&ipped

    in the %or&shop

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    60/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

    Course (ylla*us

    , 4 course syllabus 

    lists the topics thatstudents are

    epected to learn.

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    61/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

    Eearnin" *9ectives

    , 4 learning ob)ective describes

    epected student behavior under

    specified conditions.

     - ': Bocus on expected *ehavior:

    solve apply etc.

     - ': 'escri*e conditions under !hich

    the expected *ehavior is to occur. - '>/T: Use !ords such as

    understand %no! appreciate value

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    62/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    63/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    64/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    65/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    66/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations:

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    67/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations:

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    68/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations:

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    69/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    roup +xercise

    Course syllabi Bearning ob)ectivesTaonomies of learning Competency

    8atrices ubrics

    For each of your classes, %hich of the above

    methods might you use %hen describing

    >*hat do I %ant people to learn

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    70/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    #o! do people learn=

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    71/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations and Eearnin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    72/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +xpectations and Eearnin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    73/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Boundation Coalition +xamples

    3art II

    BC Partner Institutions

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    74/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    BC Partner Institutions

    , 4riEona $tate Aniversity 4$A2

    , ose(ulman Institute of Technology (IT2

    , Teas 4R8 Aniversity T48A2

    , Aniversity of 4labama A42

    , Aniversity of 8assachusetts+artmouth A8+2

    , Aniversity of *isconsin8adison A*2

    BC Core Competencies

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    75/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    BC Core Competencies

    , 4ctiveCooperative Bearning, $tudents Teams in 5ngineering

    , Increasing 3articipation of *omen and

    Anderrepresented 8inorities in 5ngineering, Technology5nabled Bearning

    , Curricular Integration

    , Continuous Improvement through4ssessment and 5valuation

    , 8anaging Curricular Change

    BC Birst Oear Curricula

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    76/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    BC Birst)Oear Curricula

    , A8+ Firstear I83AB$5 - Inte"rated Mathematics Physics Under"raduate Ea*oratory

    (cience +n"ineerin"

    , 4$A Firstear 5nP4P5

    , (IT Firstear IFC$58 - Inte"rated Birst)year Curriculum in (cience +n"ineerin"

    and Mathematics

    , T48A Firstear :o name

    , A4 Firstear TI+5 - Teamin" Inte"ration 'esi"n +n"ineerin"

    , A* Firstear BI:-$

    IMPUE(+

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    77/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    IMPUE(+

    UM' Birst)Oear Cohorts

    9

    5ntering$tudents

    CalculusIIS

    Integrated OIndependent O

    Calculus

    I

    Integrated 79O

    Independent 1O3recalc,trig, alg

    Bin&ed O

    Independent 19O

    Ineg#ae% G tigtl" interconnected section of ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics and nglis

    Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA ngineering(

    %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis

    In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses

    IMPUE(+ Birst Oear Curriculum

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    78/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    IMPUE(+ Birst)Oear Curriculum

    Co$#&e& :all Sp#ing: P"sics for Sci. H ngr. I( II 4 4

    : Princiles of Modern %em. I( II 3 3

    : Intro. to lied %em. II 0 1

    : %ritical riting and *eading I 3 0

    : Intro. to lied Sci. H ngr. I( II 3 2

    : %alc. for lied Sci. H ngr. I( II 4 4

    : IM-;LSE 0oal C#e%i& 1 14: -#og#am Specific (no IM-;LSE) < 3

    : 0oal C#e%i& 1 1

    University of Massachusetts 'artmouth

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    79/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    University of Massachusetts)'artmouth

    , Classroom layout R eGuipment - Gemodeled three classrooms !ith ta*les that seat

    four students and have t!o computers 56 seatsD

    , $oft%are R 4pplications - Maple and +xcel

     - $ased on (tudio Physics model GPID studentsperform physics and chemistry experiments in the

    classroom acHuire display and analy?e data, 4udience

     - Breshman & sophomore en"ineerin" ma9ors

    University of Massachusetts 'artmouth

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    80/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    University of Massachusetts)'artmouth

    IMP@S

    %lassroom

    Freshman 3erformance at A8ass+artmouth

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    81/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Calculus and 3hysics

       P  e  r  c  e  n   t  a  "  e   @  a   i  n

    IMPUE(+ ) Inte"ration of Math Physics Under"raduate Ea*oratory (cience

    +n"lish and +n"ineerin" ) Curriculum.

    , (tudents in the IMPUE(+ have a hi"her avera"e 44D on a common calculusexam than the avera"e ND students in the 23336 comparison "roup.

    ,  A hi"her percenta"e of students 3D in the IMPUE(+ pro"ram are stillenrolled in calculus at the final exam !hen compared to the percenta"e ofstudents 4ND in a comparison "roup.

    , (tudents in the IMPUE(+ pro"ram demonstrated a lar"er "ain on the BorceConcepts Inventory BCID a national normed physics tests than students inthe 2334 traditional curriculum.

    +nA+

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    82/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +nA+

     A(U Birst)Oear Cohorts

    6995ntering$tudents

    CalculusIIS

    Bin&ed19O

    Independent 19O

    CalculusI

    Integrated 19O

    Bin&ed 9OIndependent 9O

    3recalc,

    trig, alg

    Bin&ed 9O

    Independent 9O

    Ineg#ae% G tigtl" interconnected section of ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics and nglis

    Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis

    In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses

    Breshman Inte"rated Pro"ram in

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    83/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +n"ineerin" BIP+D

    B R35 ) ( R34

    , 5nglish ' hrs FR$

    , 3hysics 7 hrs FR$

    , Calculus 7 hrs FR$

    , 'ngineering ( ) hrs * 

    , Chemistry 7 hrs $

    B R34 ) present

    , 5nglish ' hrs FR$

    , 3hysics 7 hrs FR$

    , Calculus 7 hrs FR$

    , 'ngineering ( 2 hrs

    *+ 

    15 hours/semester 13 hours/semester

    Ari?ona (tate University

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    84/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

     Ari?ona (tate University

    Samle

    S@

    %lassroom

    3ro)ects U Integration, 4ctive

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    85/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Bearning, Technology

    Enginee#ing/

    : 'esign Process: 'esign Tools

    : Teamor> 

    Engli&/

    : *etorical S>ills: Presentation Softare

    : Peer *e$ie

    Calc$l$&/: Mat S>ills: %om#ter lge,ra

    -5&ic&/

    : Science S>ills: 'ata %at#re: a, TecniB#e

    -#o=ec&

    Birst (emester Pro9ects

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    86/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Birst (emester Pro9ects

    , -inematics

    , :e%tonKs Ba%s

    , otational 8otion

    The Catapult

    The Hungee Jump

    The Trebuchet

    The oller Coaster 

    (econd (emester Pro9ects

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    87/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    (econd (emester Pro9ects

    , 3hysical $ignals

    , +ifferential

    5Guations

    , *ave 8otion

    $ensors+etectors

    (ydroelectricity

    The 4nalog Computer 

    Traffic Flo%

    The $eismometer 

    Impact

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    88/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Impact

    Reenion ttit#des toard F% core ideas

    +nA+ Pro"ram ) ption N

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    89/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +nA+ Pro"ram ) ption N

    , Three Course Proups chosen from this list - +n"ineerin" 'esi"n 5D

     - Chemistry 5D, Chemistry for +n"ineers or eneral Chemistry

     - +n"lish Composition 7D - Computer Pro"rammin" 7D

    , Pro"rammin" CSSD or Pro"rammin" LavaD or Principles ofComputin"

     - University Physics 5D

     - Mathematics 7 or 5D, Precalculus or Calculus

     - 'i"ital 'esi"n 7D

    +nA+ Pro"ram ) ption N

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    90/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    +nA+ Pro"ram ption N

    , Fall $emester only

    , 1 combinations from list

    , $tudent groups of 9

    , $tudents epected to ta&e at least one

    more course

    TAMU Birst)Oear Cohorts

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    91/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    TAMU Birst Oear Cohorts

    1699

    5ntering$tudents

    CalculusIIS

    Bin&ed'O

    Independent 17O

    Calculus

    I

    Bin&ed 70O

    Independent 6O3recalc,trig, alg

    Bin&ed 10O

    Independent 11O

    Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA

    ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis

    In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses

    CAICABA8 3TI:$ F $TA+5:T$

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    92/143

    PRECALC

    CALCULUS 1

    BEYOND

    CALCULUS1

    >

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    93/143

    Calc 2, Phys 2, Engr 2,Chem ( 300

    Calc 2, Phys 2, Engr 2

    ( 200 Calc 2, Engr 2, Chem

    ( 300

    !n"e#en"en$ C%&rses( 300

    PRECALC

    CALCULUS 1

    BEYOND

    CALCULUS

    >

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    94/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Integration of Courses

    , First ear  -+n"ineerin"

     -Physics -Chemistry

     -Calculus

    , $econd ear  - +n"ineerin" (ciences

    , Materials

    , Thermodynamics

    , (tatics'ynamics

    , Mechanics

    , Circuits

     - Calculus, Apper +ivision

    In the old curriculum, students vie%ed thefoundation courses as dis)ointed and

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    95/143

    Un)*ers)$y C%re C&rr)c&l&m Re+&)remen$s

    C  a l  c u l  u s 

    Engineering

       E   n  g    l   i  s   h

    Chemis tr y  P     h     y

        s    i    c    s

    FI$T 54

    F  l  u i  d  s 

    H e a t  T r a n s f e r 

    E l e c t r i c a l  

    S  y s t e m s 

    S ta tics

    Dynamics

     S c  i e n c e

     s

    Materials

    Math

    $5C:+ 54

    unrelated.

    In the integrated curriculum, course

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    96/143

    Un)*ers)$y C%re C&rr)c&l&m Re+&)remen$s

    Engineering

    Calculus

    English

    Chemistry

    Physics

    BIG(T O+AG

    Fluids

    Heat

    Transfer

    Electrical

    Systems

    MaterialsStatics

    Dynamics

    SciencesMath

    (+C>' O+AG

    In the integrated curriculum, course

    material clearly illustrates ho% these

    courses relate to the engineering field.

    CA(+ (TU'O TPIC(

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    97/143

    'J%J & 'aunching

    &tructures in the Offshore (arine

     Industry

    PPI' MT*IS &

    &emiconductor Process

     E)uipment*Cathode Base +ield +ailures

    %K+' M*TIJ & Common

     (issile ,arning &ystem - Optical

    &ensor Placement 

    TL% & 1.etting /atural

    .as to (arket 2 &torage !ank

     +ire Investigation

    LLJ %+MI% & Critical

    Care*$ Case &tudy in Problem

    &olving and !eam ,ork 

    %MP? & ,eighing /eed to

     Differentiate 0&% Benefits of

    &tandardi1ation T@ %T*I% & 1 Over*speed

    of $u2iliary !urbines 2 Install

    COHP$C 3Compact Hybrid

     Particulate Collector4 at Big

     Bro5n &team Electric &tation

    MT* & Bringing p a

     /e5 +$B Plant 

    Texas A&M University

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    98/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Texas A&M University

    , 3hilosophy - Classroom technolo"y must *e scala*le for lar"e classes 288D

    , Classroom layout R eGuipment - Gemodeled a*out 28 classrooms for first)year and sophomore courses

     - ne computer per t!o students

     - 'epartments have constructed their o!n classrooms more are planned

    , $oft%are R 4pplications - Microsoft ffice Maple AutoCA' +n". +Huation (olver ++(D Internet

     - ++ has students desi"n simulate construct measure and compare

    *ehavior of circuits. Class uses >I hard!are and soft!are., 4udience

     - Breshman and sophomore en"ineerin" students

     - (peciali?ed classes in specific disciplines

    CVLB 319: ENGR 112 Team Layout  Sections 501 - 503

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    99/143

           S     c     r     e     e     n

    S 5 5

     S        c     

    r      e      e     

    n     

    indos indos

    Podi#m

    'oors 'oors

    4       

    1       2       

    2       1       

     3       

    1       1       

    2        0       

    2       

    1        0       

    1        9       

     9       

    1       

    1        3       

           1       4

           1       7

           1       6

           2       4

           2       3

           8 7 6 5

           1       5

           1       8

           2       2

    TAMU Eearnin" Communities

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    100/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    TAMU Eearnin" Communities

    St#dents o articiate in learning comm#nities -it % are retained in engineering at a

    m#c iger rate tan similar st#dents o do not articiate in learning comm#nities

    -ito#t % d#ring teir first "ear at HM.

    TAMU Eearnin" Communities

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    101/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    TAMU Eearnin" Communities

    Te gra sos te ercentage of te st#dents reared to enter soomore engineering co#rses after

    comleting a set of reB#ire co#rses called te %ommon ;od" of Knoledge co#rses. t e$er" oint in

    time after te st#dents entered Te!as HM @ni$ersit"( te ercentage of st#dents o articiated in

    learning comm#nities -it % is greater tan te ercentage of st#dents o did not articiate in

    learning comm#nities -ito#t %.

    (TU'+>T P+GBGMA>C+ >

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    102/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    (TA>'AG'IK+' T+(T( 

    O Pain Preater 

      Test than Traditional

    0 5 10 2015

    16NStandardiOed %ritical Tin>ing

    15NForce %oncet In$entor"

    10NMecanics ;aseline Test

    10N%alc#l#s %oncet Test

    en comared to eB#i$alent st#dents in traditional

    engineering rograms( after one "ear( st#dents in te ne

    c#rric#l#m erform ,etter on standardiOed tests.

    G+'UC+' A+GA+ TIM+

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    103/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    T GA'UATI>

    , (tudents in the ne! curriculum sho! a

    si"nificant reduction in class repetition

    fe!er 's Bs & FsD

    , These students complete foundation

    course !or% and "raduate a semester

    sooner on avera"eD than students !ho

    are not involved in the ne! curriculum

    TI'+

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    104/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    UA Birst)Oear Cohorts

    799 5ntering$tudents

    Calculus IIS

    Bin&ed O

    Independent 1O

    Calculus I

    Integrated 79O

    Bin&ed O

    Independent 1O

    3recalcalgebraR trig.

    Bin&ed 9O

    Independent 1O

    3recalcalgebra

    Bin&ed O

    Independent 1O

    Ineg#ae% G tigtl" interconnected sections of ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics and nglis

    Linke% G st#dents enroll in common sections of to or more of te folloingA ngineering( %alc#l#s( P"sics( nglis

    In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses

    TI'+ - #o! are math and

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    105/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    physics different=

    Traditional 8ath TI+5 8ath, 5 lectures!ee% no recitation, >o "raded home!or%, Computers not used

    , ' lectures%ee&, one hr %ee&lyrecitation

    , (ome%or& is graded, Computer soft%are used in

    class and recitation -Maple Matla*

    Traditional 3hysics TI+5 3hysics

    , Computers not used

    , Topics not lin%ed to otherclasses

    , Computer soft%are used inlecture and lab

     -+xcel Maple Interactive Physics, $ome integration %ith 8ath R

    5ngineering, $tudio 3hysics $pring 99

    TI'+ - #o! is en"ineerin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    106/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    different=

    Traditional 5ngineering Fall2 TI+5 5ngineering Fall2, Traditional *oard draftin"

    2. hrD,  AutoCA' 2. hrD

    , $&etching V9. hr2, Intro to engineering and

    disciplines, problem solving andcomputer >tools? V1 hr2

    , +esign pro)ects V1W hr2 - Geports presentations - Teamin" s%ills

    Trad. 5ngineering $pring2 TI+5 5ngineering $pring2

    , Bortran pro"rammin"

    7 hrD

    , 84TB4H programming V

    1W hr2, +esign pro)ects V1W hr2

     -Geports presentations -Teamin" s%ills

    University of Ala*ama

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    107/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    y

    ,3hilosophy - Technolo"y in classrooms classrooms convenient to students

    one ne! classroom in en"ineerin" dorm0D

    , Classroom layout R eGuipment - Gemodeled six different classrooms

     - Ta*les for four one computer per t!o students

     - 'epartments constructin" their o!n classrooms

    , $oft%are R 4pplications - Microsoft ffice compilers MATEA$ Maple

    , 4udience - Breshman en"ineerin" students

     - All students in introductory computin" seHuence

     Ala*ama Classroom Eayout

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    108/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    y

    , $everal classroom formats eist - All have computers at student des%s instructor

    console pro9ection system

     - Primarily used for lo!er)division classes

    EI>J(

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    109/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    U< Birst)Oear Cohorts

    099

    5ntering$tudents

    CalculusIIS

    Bin&ed   'OIndependent '9O

    Calculus

    I

    Bin&ed   ;O

    Independent 77O3recalc,trig, alg

    Bin&ed  O

    Independent 1O

    Linke% G st#dents enrolled in IJKS( common sections of airs of te folloing

    co#rsesA ngineering and Tecnical %omm#nication( %alc#l#s and %emistr". @

    st#dents a$e man" oter oort#nities to articiate in learning comm#nities

    In%epen%en G indeendent sections of first&"ear co#rses

    Goles of (tudent Teams

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    110/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , $tudents %or& to improve their team s&ills, $tudents %or& on team assignments,

    including one or more pro)ects

    , $tudent teams provide interpersonalsupport for students %hen they are

    struggling

    , $tudent teams provide nuclei for largercommunities across cluster 

    Industry Participation ) Ideas

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    111/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    y p

    , 4doption of a team of 7 students2 or an entire cluster of /; students2

    , Industry teams %ould visit their teamcluster '; times a semester , Industry %ould develop team pro)ects for a '7 %ee& duration based on

    >real %orld? problems and the studentKs s&ill level, Industry %ould help in the introduction and evaluation of pro)ects, Industry %ould serve as email consultants to teamclusters

    , +eliver course lectures on sub)ects such as ethics, design process,documentation, teaming, andor communications, (ost cluster for a field trip to industry, +evelop a case study to be presented by engineers in the classroom, $end ne% hires bac& to the classroom to discuss perceptions and

    realiEations of the %or&place

    , $end an eperienced engineering to tal& to the class about their pro)ects, Conduct industry training li&e teaming, conflict management,

    communications, etc., Industry do moc& intervie%s, resume %riting, dinner %ith discussion

    Industry Participation ) BC

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    112/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    y p

    , (ost cluster for a field trip to industry - UA Pilot Pro"ram

    , +evelop a case study to be presented

    by engineers in the classroom - TAMU Birst)Oear Pro"ram, Conduct industry training li&e diversity,

    conflict management, communications - TAMU Birst)Oear: Industry)conducted!or%shops on diversity conflict mana"ement

    Gole of Birst)Oear Pro9ects

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    113/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    9

    , 3rovide students opportunities to apply anengineering design process

    , 3rovide students opportunities to apply

    their teams s&ills to an etended pro)ect, 3rovide students opportunities to connect

    their mathematics and science concepts to

    practice of engineering

    BC Pu*lications on Eearnin"

    C iti

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    114/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Communities2. Mor"an L. L. Ginehart and L. Broyd ;Industry Case (tudies at Texas

     A&M University; (roceedings, 455: *$// *nnual 'onference A(++ Al*uHuerHue >M N5)N6 Lune N882

    N. Malav C. et al. Inclusive Eearnin" Communities at Texas A&M

    UniversityVA UniHue Model for +n"ineerin"0 Proceedin"s of the Birst

    Conference on Creatin" and (ustainin" Eearnin" Communities:

    Connections Colla*oration and Crossin" $orders Tampa BE March28-27 2333 ovem*er 2336

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    115/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    p

    , Conservation and accountingframe%or& for engineering science

    provides the foundation for FC

    sophomore curricula.

    , (IT $5C

     -(ophomore +n"ineerin" Curriculum

    , T48A 5ngineering $cience Curriculum

    Conservation and Accountin" Brame!or%

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    116/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    ,$ystem concept - Identify a system *oundary and surroundin"s

    , 5trinsic properties

     - Identify the extrinsic propertyiesD to *e trac%ed

    , Construct a balance eGuations2

     - Include amount of property enterin"leavin" the system

    amount "eneratedconsumed !ithin system and amount

    accumulated !ithin system

    , Conserved properties

     - >either "enerated nor consumed !ithin any system e.".

    massener"y char"e linear momentum

    G#IT (ophomore +n"ineerin"

    C i l

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    117/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Curriculum

    'ifferentialB#ations

    and Matri!

    lge,ra I

    'ifferentialB#ations

    and Matri!

    lge,ra II

    ngineering

    Statistics I

    %onser$ation

    and

    cco#ntingPrinciles

    Fl#id H Termal

    S"stems

    lectrical S"stems

    Mecanical S"stems

    nal"sis

    and 'esign

    ofngineering

    S"stems

    G#IT (+C (tudent Performance

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    118/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Te gras on te leftcomare te erformance

    of st#dents in te

    soomore engineering

    c#rric#l#m -S204 it

    te erformance of

    st#dents in d"namics. Te

    comarison is ,ased on te

    m#ltile coice B#estions

    #sed on te common

    d"namics final e!am. n

    most B#estions te S204st#dents scored as ell or

     ,etter tan st#dents in

    d"namics.

    G#IT (+C (tudent Performance

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    119/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    -#o. ? 199@"9 199"9

    SECESBo#t ro,lems ere designed to ,e longer( more diffic#lt and

    reB#ired m#ltile stes and concets. Te st#dents in te S% c#rric#l#m did

    significantl" ,etter tan tose ta>ing te traditional d"namics co#rse.

    TAMU +n"ineerin" (cience Curriculum

    Course Components

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    120/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Course Components

    5ach engineering ma)or chooses sophomorelevel courses from the follo%ing five courses

    based on the conservation and accounting

    frame%or& C4F2.

     - +n"ineerin" Mechanics usin" CABD

     - +n"ineerin" Thermodynamics usin" CABD

     - Introduction to Materials usin" CABD

     - Continuum Mechanics usin" CABD

     - +lectrical (ystems usin" CABD

    TAMU +n"ineerin" (cience Curriculum

    (tudent Performance

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    121/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    (tudent Performance

    Core Proup Comparison Proup

    4ver. $td. +ev. 4ver. $td. +ev.

    $tatics 9.; 9.9; 9.06 9.9;

    +ynamics 9.1 9.96 9.' 9.96

    Thermodynamics 9.;; 9.90 9.0 9.90

    Enginee#ing Science Acie,emen Eaminaion& 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    122/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

     ActiveCooperative Eearnin"

    vervie!

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    123/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , *hat is 4CB<, *hy 4CB<

    , *hat does 4CB involve<

     - Components of ACE, 4CB $trategies

    , Constructing 4CB class eercises

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    124/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , 4ctive Bearning - When using active learning students are

    engaged in more activities than Cust

    listening. They are involved in dialog,debate, writing, and problem solving, as

    well as higherAorder thinking, e.g., analysis,

    synthesis, evaluation.

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    125/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , Cooperative Bearning - 'ooperative learning is the instructional use of

    small groups so that students work together to

    maximiDe their own and each otherEs learning.

    2ive essential components):. 'lear, positive interdependence between students

    4. 2aceAtoAface interaction

    F. Individual accountability 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    126/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Team 5ercise, minutes2 $can through the handout on

    the introduction to 4CB

    , minutes2 $hare Guestions and insights

    %ithin the team

    , minutes2 Questions and 4ns%ers

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    127/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    128/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , First, $pringer, $tanne, and +onovan published a metaanalysis X1Y of thirtynine

    research studies conducted since 1/69 on effectiveness of small group learning inscience, mathematics, engineering and technology X

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    129/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , 3ositive Interdependence  Team membersmust rely on each other to accomplish

    goals.

    , Individual 4ccountability  8embers are

    held accountable for doing their share of

    the %or&, as %ell as mastering all material.

     ACE +lements continuedD

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    130/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , Proup 3rocessing  Teams periodicallyreflect on %hat they do %ell as a team, %hat

    they could improve, and %hat they might

    need to do differently.

    , FacetoFace Interaction  $ome or all %or&

    should be done by members %or&ing

    together.

     ACE +lements continuedD

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    131/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , $ocial $&ills  Team members practice andreceive instruction in leadership, decision

    ma&ing, communication, and conflict

    management.

    Cooperative Eearnin" (trate"ies

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    132/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , Think (air $hare

    , Think *loud (aired (roblem $olving 

    , #ig$aw 

    , /nhanced +ecture

    , 0any more techniGues exist 

    Cooperative Eearnin" (trate"ies

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    133/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Thin& D 3air $hare

    , 4pplied earlier 

    Thin& 4loud

    3aired 3roblem $olving

    , +escribe briefly

    Cooperative Eearnin" (trate"ies

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    134/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    Jig$a%

    , Ase %ith material that can

    be bro&en into

    independent parts.

    , For each part select a

    member from each team

    to be the team epert

    , 5pert groups meet and

    develop lesson on part.

    , 5perts present the lesson

    to the rest of the team.

    5nhanced Becture

    , Introductory activity

    , Becturette 191minutes2

    , 4ctivity minutes2, Becturette 191

    minutes2

    , 4ctivity minutes2

    , Becturette 191minutes2

    , Closing activity

    Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    135/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , *elder, -$M$ and .rent, -$ /2001 *s$ $ %rou!wor in &istance 4earning,5

    Che"$ 'ngr$ 'ducation, 36/2, 102(103,htt!788www$ncsu$edu8felder(!ublic8Colu"ns8*s(3$ht"l 

    , Mae it clear to the students why grou!wor is being re9uired$ - (articularly important for students in distance courses, whose learning preferences tend

    to favor working independently.

    , *or" s"all tea"s that are balanced in nowledge and sills$

     - Teams of three or four are large enough to provide adeGuate diversity of opinions,experiences, and learning styles, but not so large that individual members cansuccessfully hide.

     - Hroups of all strong students or all weak students should be avoided. If possible, at leastone member of each team should have experience with the computer tools to be used tocomplete the assignments.

    , %ive clear directions regarding both the assign"ents and the co""unication

    tools$ - >irtual groups may find it particularly frustrating to have to decipher muddy directions

    about what to do and how to do it, and their frustration could hurt both their motivationand their performance. Hive short preliminary assignments that reGuire the teammembers to demonstrate their mastery of the communication software.

    Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"

    http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/FAQs-3.htmlhttp://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/FAQs-3.html

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    136/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , Monitor tea" !rogress and be available to consult when tea"s are having !roble"s$

     - %e proactive against procrastination, which could be worse when teams are separated. -  *ppoint team coordinators whose responsibilities are to keep their teams on task and to report on

     progress and problems at regular intervals. (eriodically rotate this role among team members.

     - (rompt groups that are not meeting freGuently enough and offer guidance if they appear to be stuck.

    , ntervene when necessary to hel! tea"s overco"e inter!ersonal !roble"s$

     - $uggest strategies like active listening to resolve conflicts. 3/ach side makes its case, and the other

    side has to repeat that case to the first sideEs satisfaction without attempting to counter it. When both

    sides have had their say, a resolution is sought.6

     - 'onsider conducting such sessions by videoconference or telephone rather than asynchronously.

    , Collect !eer ratings of individual citi#enshi! and use the ratings to ad:ust the tea"

    assign"ent grades$

     - ewarding exceptional team members and penaliDing nonAcontributors helps avoid many of the

    conflicts and resentments that often occur when students work on group proCects. * procedure for

    collecting ratings and using them to adCust team grades is described in the literature.,  ntici!ate !roble"s and get hel! when necessary$

    Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    137/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , 8illis, H.J. >8anagingZand 8otivatingLZ+istance Bearning Proup

    4ctivities,? http%%%.tltgroup.orggilbertmillis.htm, Petting $et Ap

     -  As% yourself %ey Huestions a*out the proposed "roup activity

     - $e certain that "roup activities further the course o*9ectives

     - +xplain to students the nature and value of the proposed activities - $e certain to "ive clear instructions.

    , 3rovide students %ith a sense of closure.

    , Forming Teams

     - Jeep the "roup si?e small

     - Unless there is a compellin" reason to do other!ise aim for

    hetero"eneous "roups

     - To ensure hetero"eneity form teacher)assi"ned teams.

    Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"

    http://www.tltgroup.org/gilbert/millis.htmhttp://www.tltgroup.org/gilbert/millis.htm

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    138/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , Creating Team Bearning 5nvironments

     - Jeep "roups to"ether lon" enou"h to esta*lish positive !or%in" relationships -  Allo! time for team *uildin"

     - +ncoura"e students to monitor as you !ill "roup processin"

     - +ncoura"e students to practice and reinforce positive social s%ills.

    , Ase Classroom 4ssessment TechniGues C4Ts2 to determine student

    progress., Cooperative Bearning 4ctivity $tructure

     - (tructure activities to promote positive interdependence

     - Promote individual accounta*ility

    , $et up a clear, noncompetitive, criterionreferenced grading scheme.

    , 4nticipate problems and donKt be afraid to see& constructive help.

    , emember that the research on deep learning is uneGuivocal. To reach your

    intended educational outcomes, you must provide students %ith

    opportunities for interactions and for active learning. These should occur in

    carefully structured, seGuenced activities that are freGuently assessed.

    Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    139/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , *est, 8.B, and Buet&ehans, B. >Ten Preat Tips for

    Facilitating @irtual Bearning Teams,?http%%%.psdcorp.comdislearn.htm

    , Tip #1 (elp team members manage >cyberstress? byhelping them feel connected to the facilitator and otherteam members.

    , Tip # 3lan freGuent email prompts to help team membersovercome procrastination.

    , Tip #' D 3rovide a variety of tools to support the differentphases of problem solving.

    , Tip #7 D 4ssist team members %hen they struggle %ithachieving consensus.

    , Tip # 4ssemble teams strategically based on tas& andtalent.

    Cooperative Eearnin" 'istance Eearnin"

    http://www.psdcorp.com/dislearn.htmhttp://www.psdcorp.com/dislearn.htm

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    140/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , Tip #; 3rovide timely and meaningful feedbac&.

    , Tip # 0 $caffold topical discussions using a

    threaded discussion asynchronous2 tool.

    , Tip #6 5ncourage elaboration through

    Guestioning and hypertet lin&ing., Tip #/ D +iscourage )udgment, criticism and

    personal attac&s.

    , Tip #19 D Intervene to highlight areas of commonground among conflicting team members.

    Team +xercise

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    141/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , 3ic& a class in your freshman seGuence, +esign t%o different 4CB student eercises

    for this class

     -Birst exercise should ta%e no more than minutestotal for all partsD

     - (econd exercise should ta%e approximately 2

    minutes for the students to complete and report out

    -e!ort out to the grou!

     ACE Geferences

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    142/143

    University of New Haven, 10 March 2003, Mercy Center, Madison, Connecticut 

    , http%%%.clcrc.com, http%%%.activelearningsite.com

    , http%%%.ncsu.eduunityloc&ersusersf

    felderpublic8F.html, httpfoundationcoalition.org

    , http%%%.psu.educeltclbib.html

    , http%%%.%cer.%isc.edunisecl1

    (ummary:

    #o! do I %no! if it is ACE=

  • 8/20/2019 2003new Haven

    143/143

    33ositive Interdependence IIndividual 4ccountability

    PProup 3rocessing$$ocial $&ills

    FFaceToFace Interaction

    #o! do I %no! if it is ACE=