2 nd Annual CDRH/CBER Stakeholder Meeting November 18, 2004 Gaithersburg, MD
-
Upload
axel-stanley -
Category
Documents
-
view
19 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 2 nd Annual CDRH/CBER Stakeholder Meeting November 18, 2004 Gaithersburg, MD
2nd Annual CDRH/CBER Stakeholder MeetingNovember 18, 2004Gaithersburg, MD
Modular PMA Updates
Thinh Nguyen
CDRH/ODE
Modular PMA Guidance
Revisions:Panel track supplements, i.e., those with pre-
clinical data, may be submitted as modular PMA
Modules may be submitted at the same time if acceptable to review division
Modular PMA Data FY 00 - FY 03Number of Modules Received
86
80
83
73
6668707274767880828486
Nu
mb
er
of
Mo
du
les
FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Fiscal Year
Modular PMA Data FY 00 - FY 03Avg. Review Time Per Cycle
130 123
104
127
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Avg
. R
evie
w T
ime (
FD
A
Days)
FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Fiscal Year
Modular PMA Data FY 00 - FY 03Avg. # of Review Cycles
1.3 1.3 1.31.2
0
1
2
Avg
. R
evie
w C
ycle
FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Fiscal Year
Modular Data FY 00 – FY 03
91 92107
138
185
9195
122
180
258
90 91
115
135
196
114129 135
182
220
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Nu
mb
er
of
FD
A D
ays
FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Percentile
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Modular Data FY 00 – FY 03
Number of modules are decreasing (per FDA guidance document)
Modules are more complex (e.g., pre-clinical vs. biocompatibility)
Wide variability in the number of review days Review time is unpredictable
Proposed Performance GoalOption #1 The following cycle goal will applied:
For FY 06, 70% of the modules received will have an action taken within 120 days for each review cycle
For FY 07, 80% of the modules received will have an action taken within 120 days for each review cycle
Advantage – More predictabilityDisadvantage – Longer review time
Proposed Performance GoalOption #2 The following cycle goal will applied:
For FY 06, 50% of the modules received will have an action taken within 90 days for each review cycle
For FY 07, 60% of the modules received will have an action taken within 90 days for each review cycle
Advantage – Shorter review timeDisadvantage – Less predictability
Modular Performance Goal
Other Options? Submit to MDUFMA Docket