2. Fahd Al-Salleeh - Human Osteogenic Protein-1 Induces Osteogenic Differentiation

download 2. Fahd Al-Salleeh - Human Osteogenic Protein-1 Induces Osteogenic Differentiation

of 9

description

adsc

Transcript of 2. Fahd Al-Salleeh - Human Osteogenic Protein-1 Induces Osteogenic Differentiation

  • a r ch i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6

    avai lable at www.sc iencedi rec t .comHuman osteogenic protein-1 induces osteogenicdifferentiation of adipose-derived stem cells harvestedfrom mice

    Fahd Al-Salleeh a, Mark W. Beatty a,b,*, Richard A. Reinhardt a,c, Thomas M. Petro a,Larry Crouch a

    aDepartment of Oral Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE 68583-0750, USAbDepartment of Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE 68583-0750, USAcDepartment of Surgical Specialties, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE 68583-0740, USA

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Accepted 16 May 2008

    Keywords:

    Adipose-derived stem cells

    Osteogenic protein-1

    Osteogenic differentiation

    Calcification

    Osteopontin

    a b s t r a c t

    Objective: Osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) has been shown to stimulate undifferentiated cells to

    produce mineralized tissue. Adipose tissue is a rich source of undifferentiated cells for

    tissue engineering purposes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of OP-1

    on osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells and the production of bony

    tissue in vitro.

    Design: Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) were isolated from inguinal fat pads of adult

    mice. Following cell expansion the cells were plated in 8-well chambered slides. The cells

    received one of four treatments: Group 1 cells were maintained in control medium, Group 2

    cells were cultured in a common osteogenic medium, Group 3 cells were cultured in

    osteogenic medium supplemented with 250 ng/mL of OP-1, and Group 4 cells were cultured

    with 250 ng/mL of OP-1 added to control medium. Osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs was

    determined by estimating the number and size of mineralized nodules, and the amount of

    extracellular osteopontin secreted into cell culturemedium. Mineralized nodule production

    was assessed at day 21 with von Kossa staining. Extracellular osteopontin release was

    measured after 8 and 21 days by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). ANOVA/

    Tukey tests were used to identify differences among the four treatment groups for miner-

    alized nodule production and osteopontin release ( p 0.05).Results: Deposition of calcified nodules and osteopontin secretion was significantly greater

    for cell cultures incubated with OP-1 ( p 0.05). At day 21, no significant differences inosteopontin secretion were noted among groups incubated with osteogenic nutrients and/

    or OP-1 ( p > 0.05), which were significantly higher than the group incubated in cell growth

    medium only ( p 0.05). No significant differences in osteopontin secretion were notedbetween 8 and 21 days for any group ( p > 0.05). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a

    linear relationshipwas present between the presence of calcified nodules and the amount of

    osteopontin released ( p 0.05).Conclusions: OP-1 is a powerful inducer of osteogenic differentiation of adult adipose-

    derived stem cells.

    # 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    * Corresponding author at: Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry, 40th & Holdrege Streets, Lincoln, NE 68583-0740, USA.Tel.: +1 402 472 1261; fax: +1 402 472 6681.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (M.W. Beatty).

    journa l homepage: www. int l .e lsev ierhea l th .com/ journals /arob

    00039969/$ see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.05.014

  • Committee of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. The

    of Dulbeccos Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10%

    a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6 9291. Introduction

    Bone loss is one of the major health concerns in the United

    States and Europe. There are roughly more than one million

    cases of bony defects each year, and this number is projected

    to increase dramatically due the ageing of their populations.13

    Bone serves several important functions in the craniofacial

    region and throughout the body, and there is a significant need

    for bone replacement therapy due to congenital defects,

    disease and trauma. Current treatments for repairing cranio-

    facial bony defects are based on autologous and autogenous

    bone grafts. Allografts, or bone taken from another human,

    and autologous bone grafts, or bone taken fromanother region

    of ones own body, have been the gold standards of bone

    replacement for many years. More than 250,000 bone grafts

    are performed annually in the United States alone in an

    attempt to assist the body in regenerating new bone lost by

    trauma or disease.4 However, despite the usefulness of these

    reparative strategies, each method has inherent limitations,

    primarily the limited osteoinductive potential that restrict

    their universal application.57 As a result, many bony defects

    are inadequately treated. Tissue engineering offers an alter-

    native to existing treatments for restoring bone loss. A tissue

    engineering approach utilizes an extracellularmatrix scaffold,

    osteogenic or stem cells, bone morphogenic signals, or a

    combination of the three.8 This approach offers the possibility

    of rapid bone regeneration.

    Cell-based therapy incorporates the direct delivery of cells

    and bone morphogenic signals into an anatomic site to yield

    bone regeneration. This approach is advantageous because

    cells may directly participate in the regenerative process, and

    the signalling molecules exert both autocrine and paracrine

    effects, which may render the regenerative process more

    robust.9 The source and type of cells are important considera-

    tions when planning a cell-based therapeutic approach. Stem

    cells, in particular, are characterized as being clonogenic,

    having the capacity for self-renewal, and having the ability to

    terminally differentiate into cells of various lineages.10

    Because of the controversy surrounding the derivation and

    procurement of embryonic stem cells, many regenerative

    approaches have relied on the use of adult stem cells. Recent

    studies have reported the widespread distribution of adult

    stem cells in various tissues and organs.1115 Adipose tissue is

    particularly desirable as a source of stem cells because of its

    abundance and the ease of cell procurement through local

    excision or liposuction.

    Bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) are important morpho-

    gens needed for bone tissue engineering. They form a unique

    group of proteins within the transforming growth factor beta

    (TGF-b) superfamily.16 There is extensive evidence supporting

    their role as regulators of bone induction, maintenance and

    repair. The clinical applications of recombinant BMP-2 and

    BMP-7 (also known as osteogenic protein-1, or OP-1) have been

    studied extensively. Recombinant human OP-1 has been

    shown to induce bone formation in animals by stimulating

    osteogenic progenitor cells.17 The efficacy of OP-1 for treating

    orthopaedic patients is being evaluated in clinical trials.8

    Many studies have been conducted to clarify the regulatory

    mechanisms of OP-1 that underlie the differentiation processof mesenchymal stem cells to osteogenic cells. These studiesventral surface of eachmouse was scrubbedwith a germicidal

    disinfectant and a midline incision was made with sterile

    scissors in the epigastric region of the animal, exposing the

    abdominal cavity and its contents. Visceral fat encasing the

    bladder and epididymus were carefully dissected and tissues

    were transferred to a centrifuge tube containing Hanks

    Balanced Salt Solution with penicillin (100 IU/mL), strepto-

    mycin (100 mg/mL), and amphotericin B (2.5 mg/mL) (HBSS-P/S/

    A). After transferring the centrifuge tube to a laminar flow

    hood, the tissues were removed and minced into smaller

    pieceswith sterile scissors, allowing theminced pieces to drop

    directly into a new 50 mL sterile centrifuge tube. Minced

    tissueswere rinsed three times by adding 25 mLHBSS-P/S/A to

    the centrifuge tube, shaking, and evacuating the solution. The

    tissues were resuspended in 25 mL HBSS-P/S/A and centri-

    fuged at 500 times gravity for 5 min. Free floating tissue was

    removed with sterile forceps and placed into a new centrifuge

    tube containing 25 mL of 0.05% collagenase dissolved in HBSS-

    P/S/A. The centrifuge tube was allowed to roll on its side on a

    circular shaker at 37 8C for 45 min to digest the tissue and

    release the cells. The collagenase was neutralized with 25 mLhave focused on the phenotypic characteristics of osteogenic

    cells, such as alkaline phosphatase activity, extracellular

    matrix mineralization, and the expression of various extra-

    cellular matrix proteins such as collagen type II, osteopontin,

    or osteocalcin.18,19 To date, however, it is unknown whether

    OP-1 can stimulate differentiation of adipose-derived stem

    cells into an osteogenic lineage.

    An important treatment goal is to develop methods for

    bone repair that are more predictable, rapid, and reliable than

    those presently in existence. The purpose of this study is to

    focus on the effect OP-1 renders on adipose-derived stem cells

    (ADSCs) toward the production of bony tissue in vitro. Two

    markers for bone production are chosen, namely, the amount

    of mineralized tissue and the amount of extracellular

    osteopontin (a marker of osteoblast differentiation) produced

    in cell culture. Comparisons are made with cells exposed to a

    standard osteogenic environment, with and without the

    addition of OP-1, and with an unstimulated control cell

    population. The hypothesis tested in this study is that OP-1

    can enhance the ability of ADSCs to differentiate into

    osteoblast-like cells and secrete mineralized matrix.

    2. Materials and methods

    Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals were procured from

    Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri.

    2.1. Stem cell harvesting procedures

    Since a goal of this study was to develop tissue engineering

    techniques that could succeed with the use of adult donor

    tissues, 20-week-old mice were chosen for study. Five male

    Mus musculus mice, 20 weeks of age, were handled and

    euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation according to the

    procedures approved by the Institutional Animal Care andUseof fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% P/S/A. The neutralized

  • a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6930solution was poured through a 250 mm mesh into a sterile

    600 mL beaker, then transferred to a new centrifuge tube and

    centrifuged at 500 times gravity for 10 min. Floating tissue

    fragments were removed with a sterile tongue blade and

    discarded, the supernatant evacuated from the tube, the cell

    pellet resuspended in 10 mL DMEM containing erythrocyte

    lysing buffer (160 mMNH4Cl), and the centrifuge tube allowed

    to roll on a rotating shaker at room temperature. After 10 min,

    the tube was removed from the shaker and it was centrifuged

    at 500 times gravity for 10 min. The solution was removed, the

    cell pellet resuspended in 10 mL of DMEM-P/S/A + 10% FBS,

    and the suspension poured through a 100 mmmesh to remove

    lysed red blood cells. A 2 mL aliquot was placed into each of

    five 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks, and 9 mL of control medium

    (DMEM-P/S/A + 10%FBS) was added to each flask. The cells

    were incubated at 37 8C in the presence of 5% CO2 and 95%

    humidity. Following the plating procedures, medium was

    changed after 34 days of incubation to remove nonadherent

    cells, and thrice weekly thereafter. Cells were maintained at

    subconfluent levels and passaged with 0.05% trypsin/EDTA

    (GibcoBRL, Carlsbad, CA) upon reaching 8590% confluency.

    Cell expansion continued through the second passage.

    2.2. Confirmation of stem cell population

    In order to verify that cells isolated from adipose tissue were

    truly derived from a stem cell population, cells were exposed

    to cell-growth conditions that promoted either chondrogen-

    esis or osteogenesis. Once this was verified, the study focused

    on osteogenic differentiation.

    2.2.1. Verification of chondrogenic potentialAfter culture expansion to two passages, the cells were

    trypsinized and placed into 6-well well culture plates at

    approximately 106 cells/well. The Trypan blue exclusion test

    was used to estimate the number of viable cells in each well.

    Cells were incubated in 2 mL of the control medium per well

    for 24 h. To induce chondrogenic differentiation, chondro-

    genic medium consisting of DMEM, 1% FBS, 10 ng/mL

    transforming growth factor-b1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,

    Minnesota), and 6.25 mg/mL insulinwas used. A second group

    was incubatedwith controlmedium consisting of DMEMplus

    10% FBS and 1% P/S/A. Themedia were changed every 3 days.

    Chondrogenesis was assessed using Alcian blue staining at

    day 21 according to a procedure described previously.20

    Briefly, culture plates were rinsed with phosphate-buffered

    saline and fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution for

    15 min.After fixation theywere rinsedwith0.1NHCl for 5 min

    to decrease the pH to 1.0. The plates were stained with 1%

    Alcian blue dissolved in 0.1N HCl (pH 1.0), which stained

    highly sulfated proteoglycans that were characteristic of

    cartilaginous matrices. After staining overnight, the plates

    were washed twice with 0.1N HCl for 5 min to remove any

    nonspecific staining of the plates, followed by a 5 min rinse

    with tap water. To verify results, both groups were run in

    triplicate.

    2.2.2. Verification of osteogenic potential

    After culture expansion to two passages, the cells were

    trypsinized and placed into 6-well well culture plates atapproximately 1 106 cells/well. The Trypan blue exclusiontest was used to estimate the number of viable cells in each

    well. Cells were incubated in 2 mL of the control medium per

    well for 24 h. To induce osteogenic differentiation, osteogenic

    medium consisting of the controlmedium supplementedwith

    0.1 mM dexamethasone, 50 mM ascorbate-2-phosphate and

    10 mM b-glycerophosphate was prepared. Osteogenesis was

    assessed using the von Kossa staining procedure according to

    the procedure described below. To verify results, both groups

    were run in triplicate.

    2.3. Study protocols

    Following the second passage, the cells were trypsinized and

    placed into 8-well chambered slides (Lab-Tek, Nunc. Naper-

    ville, IL) at approximately 2 104 cells/well. The Trypan blueexclusion testwas used to estimate the number of cells in each

    well. Cells were incubated in 300 mL of control medium per

    well for 24 h, which was designated as day 0. Then the cells

    received one of four different treatment protocols (Table 1).

    Group (1): Cellsweremaintained in controlmedium,DMEM

    plus 10% FBS and 1% P/S/A. This served as a negative

    control.

    Group (2): Cells were cultured in an osteogenic medium

    consisting of the negative control medium supplemented

    with 0.1 mM dexamethasone, 50 mM ascorbate-2-phos-

    phate, and 10 mM b-glycerophosphate. This served as a

    positive control.

    Group (3): Cells were cultured with the same osteogenic

    medium used for group (2), supplemented with 250 ng/mL

    of osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1, R&D System, Minneapolis,

    MN).

    Group (4): Cellswere culturedwith 250 ng/mLofOP-1 added

    to the negative controlmedium. This groupwas included to

    examine the effect of OP-1 in the production ofmineralized

    nodules and expression of OPN in the absence of an

    osteogenic environment.

    In both groups containing OP-1 (groups 3 and 4), a

    concentration of 250 ng/mL was chosen based on previous

    research that demonstrated this amount was required to

    induce osteogenesis.19,21

    Mediumwas changed every 4 days for all groups. At days 8

    and 21, the supernatant was collected from 3 wells for each

    group and frozen until analyses could be performed.

    2.4. Histochemical staining

    Threewells fromeach groupwere chosen at day 21 to examine

    extracellular matrix calcification through a modified von

    Kossa staining technique.22 First, the cells were rinsed with

    phosphate-buffered saline and fixed to the well bottoms for

    1 h with 4% paraformaldehyde. Then the cells were rinsed

    with distilled water and incubated in 5% silver nitrate in

    darkness for 30 min. The silver nitrate solution was rinsed

    away several times with distilled water and exposed to

    ultraviolet light for 60 min. Finally, the cells were counter-stained with 0.1% eosin in ethanol. Following the von Kossa

    staining procedure, a histomorphometric analysis was per-

  • a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6 931formed on each well using a Nikon Labophot-2 light micro-

    scope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at 100 magnification. Thisprocedure was performed to quantify the percentage of

    culture area that was covered by black stain, which indicated

    the presence of calcified nodules. A grid with 100 intersections

    was held within the light microscope over the culture field,

    and five adjacent areas were identified in each well using a

    uniform method. Points of intersection covered by the black

    stain were counted to yield percentage of calcified extra-

    cellularmatrix. To prevent bias, the experimental groupswere

    masked and an independent observer preformed the counting

    procedure. The first field chosen was positioned at the centre

    of the culture well. The microscope stage was then moved 1/4

    turn of a stage knob toward 12 o clock, into field 2. The next

    three fields were taken by first moving the stage by 1/4 knob

    turn to centre position, then toward the 3, 6, and 9 o clock

    positions sequentially. The average percentage of staining for

    each well was calculated by averaging the five counted fields.

    2.5. Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)

    A commercially available mouse osteopontin assay kit was

    chosen (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Gunma, Japan) to

    measure secreted osteopontin. The assay was performed as

    per instructions provided by the kitmanufacturer for a 96-well

    plate. Absorbency was measured at 450 nm with an EL312e

    microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT).

    The sensitivity of the assay was 1 ng/mL.

    2.6. Data analysis

    For each experimental group, four wells were included for

    each experiment and the experiment was conducted twice.

    For histomorphometric analysis, the average percentage area

    stained within a cell culture well served as the dependent

    variable. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was

    Table 1 Medium composition for each experimentalgroup

    Group Medium composition

    1 DMEM + 10% FBS + 1% P/S/A

    2 DMEM + 10% FBS + 0.1 mM dexamethasone

    + 50 mM ascorbate-2 phosphate

    + 10 mM b-glycerophosphate + 1% P/S/A

    3 Group 2 Medium + 250 ng/mL OP-1

    4 Group 1 Medium + 250 ng/mL OP-1conducted to determine whether differences existed among

    test groups. If results from ANOVA were significant (p 0.05),a Tukeys Least Significant Difference test (LSD) was per-

    formed for pairwise comparisons ( p 0.05).For ELISA analysis, osteopontin concentration served as

    the dependent variable. A repeated measures analysis of

    variance was conducted, where each well of the ELISA plate

    wasmeasured at 8 and 21 days to determine the effect of OP-1

    presence or absence on osteopontin release. If results were

    significant (p 0.05), a Turkey LSD post hoc test wasconducted (p 0.05).

    To better understand the relationship between osteopontin

    secretion in cell culture and the amount of calcified nodule3.3. Osteopontin secretion in cell culture

    Results from ELISA showed that after 8 days, osteopontin

    secretionwas significantly higher for cell cultures treatedwith

    OP-1 (groups 3 and 4) compared to those not treated with OP-1

    (groups 1 and 2, p 0.05, Fig. 4). No significant differenceswerenoted between groups 3 and 4, which contained OP-1 and

    differed by the presence or absence of osteogenic nutrientsproduction, a scatter plot was constructed from histomorpho-

    metric and ELISA data. Pearsons correlation coefficient (r) and

    the coefficient of determination (r2) were calculated. A linear

    regression analysis was applied to the data, and a least

    squares relationship determined the slope of the regression

    line. AnANOVA tested the null hypothesis that no relationship

    existed between the histomorphometric and ELISA results

    (slope = 0, p 0.05).

    3. Results

    3.1. Stem cell differentiation

    Following excision, visceral fat pads yielded approximately

    5 107 nucleated cells per mouse. When plated, the cellsexpanded readily in culture and exhibited a fibroblast-like

    morphology within a week.

    Cells incubated in chondrogenic medium for 21 days

    stained positively for Alcian blue, whereas cells cultured in

    control medium demonstrated a light, background staining,

    indicating a negative reaction to Alcian blue (Fig. 1A and B).

    This provided evidence that the adipose-derived cells pos-

    sessed a capacity to differentiate towards a chondrogenic

    lineage.

    Cells cultured in osteogenic medium for 21 days were

    tested for the presence of a calcified extracellularmatrix using

    von Kossa staining. Consistent with osteogenesis, black

    regionswere observed in cells cultured in osteogenicmedium,

    whereas no calcification was observed for cells cultured in

    control medium (Fig. 1C and D). This suggested that the cells

    possessed a capacity to differentiate toward an osteogenic

    lineage. The results from these two experiments suggested

    that the adipose-derived cells exhibited differentiation beha-

    viours that were characteristic of a stem cell population.

    3.2. Histomorphometric analyses

    Deposition of calcified extracellular matrix, as measured by

    histomorphometry, was significantly greater for cell cultures

    incubatedwithOP-1 (p 0.05). For groups 3 and 4, the calcifiedregions were larger and more numerous (Fig. 2). Interestingly,

    medium containing OP-1 without osteogenic nutrients pro-

    duced significantly greater calcification than did the medium

    containing OP-1 with osteogenic nutrients (p 0.05, Fig. 3).The presence of OP-1 increased the production of calcified

    extracellular matrix by a factor of 2.32.8 times more than the

    osteogenic environment without OP-1, and 2733 times more

    than the control environment.(p > 0.05). At day 21, no significant differences in osteopontin

    secretion were noted among the three treatment groups

  • a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6932(p > 0.05). Cells maintained in control medium secreted

    significantly lesser amounts of osteopontin at day 21 com-

    pared to treatment groups (p > 0.05). For all groups, no

    significant differences in osteopontin secretion were noted

    between 8 and 21 days ( p > 0.05, Fig. 4).

    3.4. Relationship between calcification and osteopontinsecretion

    Results from the ANOVA demonstrated that a relationship

    was present between the calcification and osteopontin results

    (p 0.05). The value of Pearsons correlation coefficient (r) was0.78, and the coefficient of determination value (r2) was 0.61.

    This meant that 61% of the observed variation in percent

    calcification was explained by osteopontin values (Fig. 5).

    4. Discussion

    This study demonstrated the effect OP-1 rendered on

    adipose-derived stem cells toward the production of bony

    tissue. Cell-based therapy incorporates the direct delivery of

    cells and bone morphogenic signals into an anatomic site to

    yield bone regeneration. This is advantageous because the

    cells directly participate in the regenerative process and the

    signalling molecules exert both autocrine and paracrine

    Fig. 1 (A and B) Alcian blue staining performed to detect high

    cells cultured in control medium (A) and chondrogenic medium

    was observed only for cells cultured in chondrogenic medium (B

    presence of calcified extracellular matrix produced by adipose-d

    and osteogenic medium (D). Black staining, indicative of a calcifie

    in osteogenic medium (D) (scale bar length = 95 mm).effects, which should render the bone regenerative process

    more robust.9

    Initially it was confirmed that adipose-derived stem cells

    exhibited differentiation behaviours that were characteristic

    of a stem cell population. Cells incubated in chondrogenic

    medium stained positively for Alcian blue, a common marker

    of chondrogenic differentiation. Induction of osteogenesis

    was observed when cells incubated in a standard osteogenic

    environment formed islands of mineralized extracellular

    matrix, as detected with von Kossa staining. These findings

    were similar to those reported previously.15,20,23,24

    Using two markers for osteogenic differentation, namely

    the amount of mineralized tissue and extracellular osteopon-

    tin produced in cell culture, results from this study demon-

    strated that a 250 ng/mL dose of OP-1 induced osteogenesis in

    adipose-derived stem cells harvested from adult mice.

    Previous reports showed that treatment of the non-osteogenic

    mouse pluripotent cell line, C3H10T1/2 cells, with 200 or

    250 ng/mL of OP-1 induced osteogenesis.19,25 However, a

    80 ng/mL dose of OP-1 induced adipogenesis, whereas a high

    dose (500 ng/mL) of OP-1 caused the same cells to exhibit

    chondrocytic properties.18 More recently, a very low dose

    (10 ng/mL) of OP-1 stimulated a chondrogenic phenotype in

    adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.26 Taken

    together, changing OP-1 concentration may alter the differ-

    entiation pathway in certain cell types, and the 250 ng/mL

    ly sulfated proteoglycans present in adipose-derived stem

    (B) for 21 days. Blue staining, indicative of chondrogenesis,

    ). (C and D) Von Kossa staining was performed to detect the

    erived stem cells cultured for 21 days in control medium (C)

    d extracellular matrix, was observed only for cells cultured

  • Fig. 2 Von Kossa staining of adipose-derived stem cells culture

    osteogenic media + OP-1 (C) and control medium + OP-1 (D). Mo

    observed by an increased black stain for cells cultured with OP

    Fig. 3 Bar graphs of percent calcification area produced by

    cells in each treatment group. Error bars represent

    standard deviations. Groups with different letters are

    significantly different at a = 0.05 confidence level.

    a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6 933dose used in the current study seemed appropriate to induce

    osteogenesis.

    Previous research demonstrated that OP-1 induced chon-

    drogenic cell differentiation prior to osteogenesis. Exposure of

    mesenchymal cell lines to OP-1 for more than 8 days was

    necessary to maintain a commitment to an osteoblast line-

    age.18,19 It is possible that a similar pattern of differentiation

    occurred in the present study. However, Alcian blue staining

    was not performed at early stages of differentiation to confirm

    such an occurrence.

    The primary objective of the present study was to measure

    extracellular mineralization and osteopontin production when

    adipose-derived stem cells were incubated in control medium,

    osteogenic medium, osteogenic medium supplemented with

    OP-1, and control medium supplemented with OP-1. It was

    clearly observed that cells exposed to OP-1 secreted a calcified

    extracellular matrix that was greater than from cells cultured

    without OP-1. Similarly, OP-1 caused the cells to produce

    significantly higher quantities of osteopontin at both 8 and 21

    days of cell culture. These findings were consistent with those

    reported using fetal stem cell line.18,21 However, a critical factor

    was the differentiation state of the cell. In a committed

    d for 21 days in control medium (A), osteogenic medium (B),

    re numerous and larger regions of calcified matrix were

    -1 (C and D) (scale bar length = 95 mm).

  • Fig. 4 Bar graphs of mean osteopontin release into cell

    a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6934osteoblast cell line, OP-1 increased the number of osteoblasts

    and increasedextracellularmatrixmineralization, but it didnot

    culturemediumasmeasured by ELISA. Error bars represent

    standard deviations. Capital letters represent comparisons

    among groups at 8 days; small letters represent

    comparisons among groups at 21 days. Groups denoted

    with the same letter are not significantly different at a = 0.05

    confidence level. Brackets show comparisons between 8

    and 21 days for each treatment group. All comparisons are

    denoted as n.s., or non-significant (p > 0.05).increase osteopontin expression. However, in a primary

    osteoblast cell line, OP-1 caused both mineralization and

    osteopontin secretion to increase.27 In the present study,

    osteopontin production for the two OP-1 containing groups

    was significantly higher than that measured for the osteogenic

    medium alone group at day 8, but by day 21 the differences

    among the three groups were not significant. This implies that

    the cells in osteogenic media alone were in a pre-osteoblastic

    state at day 8, whereas OP-1 sped the differentiation process

    earlier in culture.

    Fig. 5 Scatter plot with linear regression line of

    osteopontin release versus calcified matrix production at

    21 days of cell culture.A question arises as to why osteopontin was present at day

    8 and 21 in all groups, including the cellsmaintained in control

    medium. The fact that osteopontin was present in the control

    group likely indicates that more differentiated mesenchymal

    cells were mixed with the adipose-derived stem cell popula-

    tion. Previous research demonstrated that osteopontin

    expression was observed in osteogenically-induced and

    non-induced adipose-derived stem cells containing both

    undifferentiated and differentiated mesenchymal cells.20,24,28

    Results from this study confirmed the fact that different

    nutrients added to cell growth medium exerted differential

    effects on osteogenesis, which agreed with previous

    research.14,17,18,20,24,29,30 For example, when compared to cells

    cultured in control medium (group 1), extracellular matrix

    calcification at 21 days was significantly higher for cells grown

    in osteogenic medium (group 2). However, when OP-1 was

    added to the osteogenic medium (group 3), calcified extra-

    cellular matrix was significantly lower than OP-1 alone (group

    4). This brings into question whether certain osteogenic

    nutrients may have exerted an inhibitory effect on OP-1. In

    consideration of the roles played by osteogenic nutrients,

    previously it was reported that when b-glycerophosphate was

    added to osteoblast culture medium, ascorbic acid functioned

    as a cofactor in hydroxylation reactions that produced

    hydroxyapatite.31 Glucocorticoids have been shown to exert

    both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on osteogenic differ-

    entiation depending upon dose, duration, cell type and stage

    of cell differentiation. For example, synthetic glucocorticoid

    dexamethasone was shown to be an absolute requirement for

    in vitro bone nodule formation and mineralization in rat

    marrow stroma-derived cell cultures.32 However, dexametha-

    sone exerted inhibitory effects on osteogenesis in adipose-

    derived stem cells, andwhen dexamethasonewas substituted

    with dihydroxyvitamin D3, osteogenesis increased.24 Osteo-

    genesis was reduced when both dexamethasone and dihy-

    droxyvitamin D3 were added to an osteogenic medium.33 The

    effect of OP-1, when added mouse calvarial cell cultures

    containing ascorbic acid and b-glycerophosphate, was to

    increase osteocalcin production.19 Based on information from

    these studies, it is postulated that certain osteogenic nutri-

    ents, possibly dexamethasone, may have reduced the osteo-

    genic capabilities of OP-1 observed in this study.

    The bone nodule formation pathway in vitro has been

    subdivided into three stages: proliferation, extracellular matrix

    development, and maturation which includes mineralization.

    Each phase is accompanied by characteristic changes in gene

    expression. It has been shown that osteopontin is expressed by

    pre-osteoblasticcellsearly inboneformation,withhigher levels

    expressed after mineralization has been initiated.34,35 A strong

    relationship between osteopontin secretion and calcified

    extracellular matrix production was demonstrated in this

    study. This supports the contention that when osteopontin is

    upregulated, the amount of calcified extracellular matrix will

    increase. Since a proportional relationship was demonstrated

    (Fig. 5), it is possible to estimate the amount of calcification

    based on osteopontin release, through substitution into a

    linear regression equation. Under the conditions of this study,

    each increase of 1 ng/mL osteopontin release extracellularlyresulted in an additional 1.6% calcified area within a cell

    culture well.

  • 2004;11:41726.

    11. Young HE, Mancini ML, Wright RP, Smith JC, Black Jr AC,Reagan CR, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reside within

    a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6 935the connective tissues of many organs. Dev Dyn1995;202:13744.

    12. Dennis JE, Merriam A, Awadallah A, Yoo JU, Johnstone B,Caplan AI. A quadripotential mesenchymal progenitor cellisolated from the marrow of an adult mouse. J Bone Miner Res1999;14:7009.

    13. Toma JG, Akhavan M, Fernandes KJ, Barnabe-Heider F,Sadikot A, Kaplan DR, et al. Isolation of multipotent adultstem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol2001;3:77884.

    14. Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatalhuman dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:1362530.

    15. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, et al.10. Korbling M, Estrov Z, Champlin R. Adult stem cells andtissue repair. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;32(Suppl. 1):S234.In conclusion, the results of the study indicate that OP-1

    was a powerful inducer of terminal osteogenic differentiation

    and mineralization, over and above growth factors present in

    osteogenic medium.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors gratefully acknowledge Merlyn Nielsen for

    supplying mice used in the study, Bobby Simetich for his

    technical assistance and Kim Theesen for his work on graphic

    arts.

    r e f e r e n c e s

    1. Rose FR, Oreffo RO. Bone tissue engineering: hope vs hype.Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;292:17.

    2. Laurencin CT, Ambrosio AM, Borden MD, Cooper Jr JA.Tissue engineering: orthopedic applications. Annu RevBiomed Eng 1999;1:1946.

    3. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL. Bone tissue engineering:state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 2004;4:74365.

    4. Braddock M, Houston P, Campbell C, Ashcroft P. Born againbone: tissue engineering for bone repair. News Physiol Sci2001;16:20813.

    5. Jackson IT, Helden G, Marx R. Skull bone grafts inmaxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1986;44:94955.

    6. Oklund SA, Prolo DJ, Gutierrez RV, King SE. Quantitativecomparisons of healing in cranial fresh autografts,frozen autografts and processed autografts, andallografts in canine skull defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res1986:26991.

    7. Sawin PD, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH. A comparativeanalysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity forautogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posteriorcervical fusions. J Neurosurg 1998;88:25565.

    8. Pecina M, Giltaij LR, Vukicevic S. Orthopaedic applications ofosteogenic protein-1 (BMP-7). Int Orthop 2001;25:2038.

    9. Gafni Y, Turgeman G, Liebergal M, Pelled G, Gazit Z, Gazit D.Stem cells as vehicles for orthopedic gene therapy. Gene TherMultilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implicationsfor cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng 2001;7:21128.16. Yamaguchi A, Komori T, Suda T. Regulation of osteoblastdifferentiation mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins,hedgehogs, and Cbfa1. Endocr Rev 2000;21:393411.

    17. Sampath TK, Maliakal JC, Hauschka PV, Jones WK, Sasak H,Tucker RF, et al. Recombinant human osteogenicprotein-1 (hOP-1) induces new bone formation in vivowith a specific activity comparable with naturalbovine osteogenic protein and stimulates osteoblastproliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biol Chem1992;267:2035262.

    18. Asahina I, Sampath TK, Nishimura I, Hauschka PV. Humanosteogenic protein-1 induces both chondroblastic andosteoblastic differentiation of osteoprogenitor cellsderived from newborn rat calvaria. J Cell Biol 1993;123:92133.

    19. Shea CM, Edgar CM, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC. BMPtreatment of C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells inducesboth chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. J Cell Biochem2003;90:111227.

    20. Ogawa R, Mizuno H, Watanabe A, Migita M, Shimada T,Hyakusoku H. Osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiationby adipose-derived stem cells harvested from GFPtransgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;313:8717.

    21. Yeh LC, Adamo ML, Kitten AM, Olson MS, Lee JC. Osteogenicprotein-1-mediated insulin-like growth factor geneexpression in primary cultures of rat osteoblastic cells.Endocrinology 1996;137:192131.

    22. Puchtler H, Meloan SN. Demonstration of phosphates incalcium deposits: a modification of von Kossas reaction.Histochemistry 1978;56:17785.

    23. Huang JI, Beanes SR, Zhu M, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH,Benhaim P. Rat extramedullary adipose tissue as a source ofosteochondrogenic progenitor cells. Plast Reconstr Surg2002;109:103341. discussion 1042-1033.

    24. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI, MizunoH, et al. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotentstem cells. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:427995.

    25. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblastdifferentiation. Cell 1997;89:74754.

    26. Knippenberg M, Helder MN, Zandieh Doulabi B, Wuisman PI,Klein-Nulend J. Osteogenesis versus chondrogenesis byBMP-2 and BMP-7 in adipose stem cells. Biochem Biophys ResCommun 2006;342:9028.

    27. Cheifetz S, Li IW, McCulloch CA, Sampath K, Sodek J.Influence of osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1;BMP-7) andtransforming growth factor-beta 1 on bone formation invitro. Connect Tissue Res 1996;35:718.

    28. Dragoo JL, Choi JY, Lieberman JR, Huang J, Zuk PA, Zhang J,et al. Bone induction by BMP-2 transduced stem cellsderived from human fat. J Orthop Res 2003;21:6229.

    29. Bellows CG, Heersche JN, Aubin JE. Determination of thecapacity for proliferation and differentiation ofosteoprogenitor cells in the presence and absence ofdexamethasone. Dev Biol 1990;140:1328.

    30. Bellows CG, Aubin JE, Heersche JN, Antosz ME. Mineralizedbone nodules formed in vitro from enzymaticallyreleased rat calvaria cell populations. Calcif Tissue Int1986;38:14354.

    31. Duplomb L, Dagouassat M, Jourdon P, Heymann D.Differentiation of osteoblasts from mouse embryonic stemcells without generation of embryoid body. In Vitro Cell DevBiol Anim 2007;43:214.

    32. Maniatopoulos C, Sodek J, Melcher AH. Bone formation invitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of youngadult rats. Cell Tissue Res 1988;254:31730.33. Atmani H, Chappard D, Basle MF. Proliferation anddifferentiation of osteoblasts and adipocytes in rat bone

  • marrow stromal cell cultures: effects of dexamethasone andcalcitriol. J Cell Biochem 2003;89:36472.

    34. McKee MD, Nanci A. Secretion of Osteopontin bymacrophages and its accumulation at tissue surfaces duringwound healing in mineralized tissues: a potential

    requirement for macrophage adhesion and phagocytosis.Anat Rec 1996;245:394409.

    35. Sodek J, Chen J, Nagata T, Kasugai S, Todescan Jr R, Li IW,et al. Regulation of osteopontin expression in osteoblasts.Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995;760:22341.

    a r c h i v e s o f o r a l b i o l o g y 5 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 9 2 8 9 3 6936

    Human osteogenic protein-1 induces osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells harvested from miceIntroductionMaterials and methodsStem cell harvesting proceduresConfirmation of stem cell populationVerification of chondrogenic potentialVerification of osteogenic potential

    Study protocolsHistochemical stainingEnzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)Data analysis

    ResultsStem cell differentiationHistomorphometric analysesOsteopontin secretion in cell cultureRelationship between calcification and osteopontin secretion

    DiscussionAcknowledgmentsReferences