2 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 …docs.dpaq.de/13728-show_temp.pl-41.pdfApple’s Motion for...

2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3836 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 2

Transcript of 2 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 …docs.dpaq.de/13728-show_temp.pl-41.pdfApple’s Motion for...

Page 1: 2 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 …docs.dpaq.de/13728-show_temp.pl-41.pdfApple’s Motion for Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest, and Post-Judgment Interest (Dkt. 3826-3),

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3836 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 2

Page 2: 2 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 …docs.dpaq.de/13728-show_temp.pl-41.pdfApple’s Motion for Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest, and Post-Judgment Interest (Dkt. 3826-3),

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Whereas the Court has been advised by the parties that the above-entitled action has been

settled, all remaining claims and counterclaims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice, to

the extent such are still pending, and all parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Apple’s Motion for Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest, and Post-Judgment Interest

(Dkt. 3826-3), Samsung’s Motion for Entry of Judgment of Invalidity on Apple’s Claim for

Infringement of the ’915 Patent or in the Alternative for Relief from Judgment Under Rule

60(b)(6) (Dkt. 3827), and Samsung’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial, and/or

Remittitur (Dkt. 3828-2) are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: The Honorable Lucy H. Koh

United States District Judge

June 27, 2018

The Clerk shall close the file.

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3836 Filed 06/27/18 Page 2 of 2