1st meeting ECDS Scientific Advisory Board and 10th meeting ECDS Board Climate change data and...
-
Upload
michelle-daugherty -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of 1st meeting ECDS Scientific Advisory Board and 10th meeting ECDS Board Climate change data and...
1st meeting ECDS Scientific Advisory Board and
10th meeting ECDS Board
Climate change data and information needs and relevant EEA activities
André Jol
European Environment Agency
• Global Framework for Climate Services (WMO GFCS)
• US, NOAA prototype
• Japan, other countries
• GMES is key European contribution to GEO/GEOS
What are climate services globally?
Source: WMO, http://www.wmo.int/hlt-gfcs/index_en.htmlNOAA, http://www.climate.gov/#climateWatch
GCOS supports UNFCCC and GFCS
ECVs, both space and in situ monitoring
Additional costs: 2.5 billion USD/yr (1.0 for satellite data and 1.5 for in situ and national actions)
Global sustained funding for monitoring needed (in situ and satellite)
GMES to build on GCOS ECVs and quality procedures
What are GMES priorities for ECVs?
GMES and GCOS
Source: Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC (2010 Update), GCOS-138
• Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth: ‘strengthen our economies' resilience to climate risks’
• Climate change adaptation (Mainstreaming in EU policies, Clearinghouse on adaptation by March 2012, EU strategy by 2013)
…’actors whose main tasks are not directly concerned with mitigation of, or adaptation to, climate change also work to attain these goals’
• Environmental policies:
• Water Framework Directive and Floods Directive
• Nature protection directives, policies to halt biodiversity loss
• Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM)
• Sectoral, cross-cutting: maritime, agriculture; forestry; human health; disaster risk reduction; infrastructure e.g. energy, transport (regional policies); urban areas
• GMES climate service
Key relevant EU policy processes
Summary of (EEA) user requirements
• Long series of processed observations (reanalysis), including daily data to capture extreme events
• High spatial resolution for gridded observations and projections (25 km or less, to allow analysis for river catchments, sea basins, bio-geographic regions)
• Pan-European coverage
• Consistency (time, space and between variables)
• Quality (fit for purpose)
• Easily accessible and transparent products and services for different users (experts, general public)
• Following SEIS principles and INSPIRE Directive requirements
GMES Climate Service expert group On 9th November 2010, the EU Regulation (911/2010) on the
European Earth monitoring programme (GMES) and its Initial Operations (2011-2013) have come into force
With this regulation GMES has become operational
The service component of GMES shall comprise i.a:
Access to information for CC monitoring in support of
mitigation and adaptation policies
November 2010: GMES CC expert group
April 2011: Consultation with major European (Climate-related) Institutions
Report “GMES Climate Service” open for discussionWMO-GFCS defines Climate Service as ‘Climate Information prepared and delivered to meet users needs’
User needs and Climate Quality (1)
GMES Climate service should support (Climate policy) users at European and National level European level: EC DG-CLIMA => White paper (2009): The
Clearing House Mechanism will rely on GMES information concerning climate change impact, vulnerability and best practices on adaptation. Both Observations and Model results
National level: Public Institutions, like National Meteorological Services
GMES Climate service will have to complement and interact with existing services and activities
The ambition of the GMES Climate Service must be to provide information products meeting the three GCOS goals: Monitoring the climate system Detecting and attributing climate change Assessing impacts of, and supporting adaptation to, climate
variability and change
This will be achieved through the 50 GCOS Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) as endorsed by WMO, CEOS, COP, and UNFCCC All ECVs are required to support the work of the UNFCCC
and the IPCC All ECVs are technically and economically feasible for
systematic observation International exchange of these variables is required for both
current and historical observations
User needs and Climate Quality (2)
Products and tools for monitoring policies Climate monitoring and data integration
Focus on GCOS ECVs Recovery, lodging, digitally archiving, homogenization
Delivering of consistent data sets of observational data For climate model initialisation for seasonal and decadal predictions For re-analysis and attribution
Earth system re-analysis Including interactions between Atmosphere – Ocean – Land -Ice/Snow -
Hydrological Cycle – Dynamical vegetation Data assimilation with integrated observational data
Portal for climate impact indicators Improve historical records of impact indicators Conversion into gridded data sets covering sparse regions
Attribution service Natural climate variability versus human-induced effects Linking Desaster Risk Reduction to CC Relies on climate modelling capabilities
A Climate Service Flow Chart
Observations-Satellite-In SituESA – CCIEUMETSAT – SAFOther archives
Earth System Model- Atmosphere- Ocean- Land- Ice Snow- Hydro Cycle
Re-analysisData Assimilation
ECVsAtm/Ocean/Land/…- Interpolation- Mapping
All variablesAtm/Ocean/Land/…- ECVs- Many others (Atm 80 vars)
Prognostic ClimateAll variablesAtm/Ocean/Land/…- Hind Cast- 2020- 2050
Impact IndicatorsService
ECVs time series
All variables,gridded, Z-levels,hourly, re-analysis period
IndicatorsExample: T2, SST, YOLL, …
All variables,gridded, Z-levels,hourly, prognostic period
AttributionService
Infrastructure Post Processing Data BaseUser input Infra/User
GMES
The Helsinki Questions (conference June 2012) How to integrate research needs in the evolving service and which are priorities
– FP7/8?
Where to invest in supercomputing and how to integrate existing capacities?
How to support Climate prediction/projection/scenario – facilitate access to existing activities?
Will it be possible to address the huge challenge of an attribution service and how to interface with users?
Impact indicator service – direct generation and/or supporting tools?
How to implement links between GMES Climate Service and GFCS?
Expectations regarding data policy?
Roadmap for GMES Climate Service?
EURO4M (coordinator KNMI-NL; 9 partners; 04/2010 – 03/2014 ) ERA-CLIM (coordinator ECMWF-UK; 10 partners) MONARCH-A (coordinator NERSC-NO; 8 partners) CARBONES (coordinator Noveltis-FR; 14 partners)
«Full and open access to information produced by GMES services and data collected through GMES infrastructure, subject to relevant international agreements, security restrictions and licensing conditions, including registration and acceptance of user licences »
• Helps users aimed at developing climate change adaptation policies and actions to access and share information
• Launch 23 March 2012 (Connie Hedegaard, EEA)
• EEA to manage/maintain
• ETC CCA supports
• Key challenge: quality assurance/control of information
European Climate Adaptation Platform (CLIMATE-ADAPT)
See: http://ace.geocat.net/web/guest/home
Potential link of GMES data within (CLIMATE-ADAPT)
Climate change observations and scenarios
• GMES - Essential climate variables
• Link with GFCS + regional / national centers
• Land-use, water, socio-economic observations, statistics and scenarios
Adaptation measures,
actions
Extended database of measures
• Typology
• Assessment of environmental, social, economic impacts
• Identifying no-regret measures
Adaptation plans and strategies
• Information on existing adaptation strategies, key institutions and stakeholders
• Joint activitiesbetween MS and third countries (research, adaptation measures)
• Practical tools for the development of adaptation policy
Impacts & Vulnerability
Integration information on climate, land-use, water, ecosystems,
socio-economic variables
• Exposure to impacts, sensitivity and adaptive capacity
• Detailed geographical and sectoral perspective
• Vulnerability indicators, policy-oriented
• DG CLIMA manages, EEA+JRC support• Contractor up to March 2012, EEA maintains afterwards• Countries and others tested/commented on prototypes
2012 report on climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation
• Update/extension of 2008 report • Two parallel reports in 2012• Indicator-based (climate system; impacts
of climate change; vulnerabilities/risks)• Adaptation assessment (EU, national,
sectoral)
Objectives indicator report• Present past and projected climate change and
impacts through (about 40) indicators with communication of uncertainties
• Identify sectors and regions most vulnerable/at risk
• Increase awareness of need for adaptation actions
• Highlight gaps in monitoring, data, scenarios
Europe’s key past and projected impacts and risks (SOER2010), to be updated/extended for CC IVA 2012 report
16
Objectives, planning, content cities and adaptation reportObjectives:•To support stakeholders involved in climate change adaptation and urban development •To support policy development and decision-making across all spatial levels (EU, national, regional, local) (multilevel governance)
Planning:•Publication: May 2012
Content:
Initial in-situ requirements
Core services (FP7 project Jan 2010 – Dec 2012, climate change not included)
GISCGMES in-situ coordination
Land monitoring Atmosphere
monitoring Ocean monitoring Emergency response
© MyShotz.com/Fotolia
Source: http://gisc.ew.eea.europa.eu
Partnerships: Purpose and approach
To gain commitment from national authorities to secure some priority areas of
the in-situ capacity needed
To gain commitment from national authorities to secure some priority areas of
the in-situ capacity needed
International coordinating
bodies
to explore their potential
contributionfor sustainable provision of in
situ
International coordinating
bodies
to explore their potential
contributionfor sustainable provision of in
situ
Countries
to clarify capacities,
identify gaps and constraints and agree on commitment
Countries
to clarify capacities,
identify gaps and constraints and agree on commitment
Dialogue with the European coordinating bodies and other stakeholders•Country visits 2011: Norway,
France, UK, Italy, Czech Republic, Finland, Denmark; more planned in 2012
•Agreements:Signed with EuroGeoSurveys and
EuroGeographicsUnder negotiation with
EUMETNET and ECMWF
•Dialogue with Research projects: NORS, Jerico, EuroArgo, Ferrybox, etc
•Cooperation with international organisations
Photo: Pharma-alliance.com
In-situ requirements criticality breakdownFor more information: In-situ requirements report
SetupOperationalData AccessCoordination
Valuation of in-situ contribution (all GMES services) – annual costs in 1000 €
410,440 per annum
For more information: Cost valuation report
Foreseen EU contribution for operational GMES in-situ: 30 – 110 M€
Foreseen EU contribution for operational GMES in-situ: 30 – 110 M€
In-situ requirements for Land Cover GIO - land
Delegated tasks to the EEA
A. GMES land monitoring service: Pan-European Continental Component
Providing land cover and land cover change information at Pan-European scale
Production of 5 thematic high resolution layers
B. GMES land monitoring service: Local Component Providing very High Resolution information on
specific areas of interest at European level (as defined in GMES annual work programmes)
C. Dissemination + archiving + cataloguing According to Dissemination Plan
• GISC
• GIO land (European/local) coordination
• User forum
• GMES Committee
• GMES NFP Working Group
• ETC (European Topic Centres) (air, marine, land) collaboration
Summary of EEA involvement in GMES
European Environment Agency
• Scientifically sound monitoring data, reanalysis and indicators (space, in-situ)
• High resolution climate scenarios at right scales with proper communication of uncertainties
• Analysis of vulnerabilities, risks and opportunities using other scenarios (socio-economic, demographic, land use, ecosystems)
• Implementation and mainstreaming of climate change adaptation into other policy areas and actions
• Analysis of effectiveness of adaptation strategies and actions
• Sharing and giving access to data and information through national platforms and EU adaptation portal (CLIMATE-ADAPT)
• Future GMES climate service will be important for policymakers, other users
Conclusions on climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation