1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011 - Kerry s kleyman phd€¦ · 1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011...

1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011 PSYC 610-01 (001098)

College of Professional Studies Kerry Kleyman

Fall 2011 FY20123

#of %of Cum% # Item Text Response Options Responses Resps for Item

1. Stimulated student thinking Always 7 58.33% 58.33%

Usually 3 25.00% 83.33%

Sometimes 1 8.33% 91.67%

Seldom 1 8.33% 100.00%

2. Explained course objectives & outcomes Always 5 41.67% 41.67%

Usually 4 33.33% 75.00%

Sometimes 2 16.67% 91.67%

Seldom 1 8.33% 100.00%

3. Explained course requirements and evaluation crite ia Always 7 58.33% 58.33%

Usually 1 8.33% 66.67%

Sometimes 3 25.00% 91.67%

Seldom 1 8.33% 100.00%

4. Presented material in an organized manner Always 6 50.00% 50.00%

Usually 1 8.33% 58.33%

Sometimes 3 25.00% 83.33%

Seldom 2 16.67% 100.00%

5. Made good use of community resources Always 5 41.67% 41.67%

Usually 1 8.33% 50.00%

Sometimes 4 33.33% 83.33%

Never 1 8.33% 91.67%

N/A 1 8.33% 100.00%

6. Spoke clearly and audibly Always 7 58.33% 58.33%

Usually 4 33.33% 91.67%

Sometimes 1 8.33% 100.00%

7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectful y Always 5 41.67% 41.67%

Usually 3 25.00% 66.67%

Sometimes 4 33.33% 100.00%

8. Created a classroom environment conducive to lea ning Always 6 50.00% 50.00%

Usually 3 25.00% 75.00%

Sometimes 3 25.00% 100.00%

9. Kept discussion on track Always 6 50.00% 50.00%

Usually 2 16.67% 66.67%

Sometimes 4 33.33% 100.00%

10. Was prepared for sessions with students Always 7 58.33% 58.33%

Usually 3 25.00% 83.33%

Sometimes 2 16.67% 100.00%

Office of Institutional Research I /24/• 012 3:03:41 PM 709

llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2011 PSYC 610-01 (001098)


Fall 2011 FY20123

#of %of Cum%

# Item Text Response Options Responses Resps for Item

11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter Always 8 66.67% 66.67%

Usually 2 16.67% 83.33%

Sometimes 2 16.67% 100.00%

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, Always 6 50.00% 50.00% disabilities, and sexual preference

Usually 3 25.00% 75.00%

Sometimes 3 25.00% 100.00%

13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully Always 6 50.00% 50.00%

Usually 2 16.67% 66.67%

Sometimes 3 25.00% 91.67%

Seldom 1 8.33% 100.00%

14. Provided helpful written responses on student's work Always 4 33.33% 33.33%

Usually 4 33.33% 66.67%

Sometimes 1 8.33% 75.00%

Seldom 3 25.00% 100.00%

15. Informed students of their progress in time to correct deficiencies Always 4 36.36% 36.36%

Usually 4 36.36% 72.73%

Sometimes 2 18.18% 90.91%

Never 1 9.09% 100.00%

16. Facilitated students' active involvement in learning Always 4 33.33% 33.33%

Usually 5 41.67% 75.00%

Sometimes 3 25.00% 100.00%

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase understanding and application Always 6 50.00% 50.00%

Usually 3 25.00% 75.00%

Sometimes 2 16.67% 91.67%

Never 1 8.33% 100.00%

18. Held class as scheduled Always 9 75.00% 75.00%

Usually 1 8.33% 83.33%

Sometimes 1 8.33% 91.67%

Seldom 1 8.33% 100.00%

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? Excellent 6 50.00% 50.00%

Good 6 50.00% 100.00%

20. How much have you learned in this course? Exceptional Amount 4 33.33% 33.33%

Very Much 3 25.00% 58.33%

Much 4 33.33% 91.67%

Some 1 8.33% 100.00%

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? Yes 12 100.00% 100.00%

22. How important was class attendance to understanding the subject? Very 11 91.67% 91.67%

Somewhat 1 8.33% 100.00%

Office of Institutional Research 1/24/2012 3:03:41 PM Page 1710

c

',Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011 PSYC 610-01 (001098)


#

23.

24.

Fall 2011 FY20123

#of Item Text Response Options Responses

How many hours per week did you typically spend p epar ng for class? 4to 6

7to10

11to15

16 or more

How would you rate the quality of the classroom sp !Ice? Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unacceptable

Statistics [ #}Item Text

1. I stimulated student thinking

2. I Explained course objectives & outcomes J

3. I Explained course requirements and evaluation! critefia

4. Presented material in an organized manner

5. Made good use of community resources

6. Spoke clearly and audibly

7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfulllt

8. Created a classroom environment conducive tp !earring

9. Kept discussion on track

I 10. lwas prepared for sessions with students

I 1i. I Demonstrated mastery of subject matter

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, ge~der, ace, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, and sexual preference

I 13. I Defined assignments clearly and carefully I l 14. I Provided helpful written responses on studenh work

15. Informed students of their progress in time to corre ct deficiencies

16. Facilitated students' active involvement in lea ning

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase ur derst anding and application

18. Held class as scheduled

19. How would you rate the overall performance pfthi! instructor?

20. How much have you learned in this course?

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second mee~ mg?

! 22. !How important was class attendance to undeqstantjing the subject?

I 23. I How many hours per week did you typically s&end preparing for class?

l 24. l How would you rate the quality of the classropm ~ace?

End pf ret>ults for Course ID 001098

I

l

7

1

2

2

2

6

3

1

Valid! Mean} SD]

121 1.671 0.981

121 1.921 1.001

121 1.831 i.111

12 2.08 1.24

11 2.18 1.33

12 1.50 0.67

12 1.92 0.90

12 1.75 0.87

12 1.83 0.94

121 1.581 0.791

121 1.501 o.8ol

12 1.75 0.87

121 1.921 1.081

11 2.09 1.22

12 1.92 0.79

12 1.92 1.24

12 1.50 1.00

12 2.00 1.04

12 2.17 1.03

12 1.00 0.00

121 1.081 0.291

Office of Institutional Research 1V24/2~12 3:03:41 PM

%of Cum% Resps for Item

58.33% 58.33%

8.33% 66.67%

16.67% 83.33%

16.67% 100.00%

16.67% 16.67%

50.00% 66.67%

25.00% 91.67%

8.33% 100.00%

Page 1711

llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2011 College of Professional Studies

# ltemText

Office of Institutional Research 1/24/2012 3:03:41 PM

PSYC 610-01 (001098)

Kerry Kleyman

Fall 2011 FY20123

Response Options #of

Responses %of Cum% Resps for Item

Page 1712

Metropo~it~ D Inst c ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [[hmcrn

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in o1lr continued efforts to improve the ic lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. Allresponses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices. • Answer questions on both sides.

•

6 di it Course ID

o I 0 '1 ~ ~®til®®

1 CD@CDCDCD 2@@®®® 3@@®®®

©©©©© s@®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)

s@®®® 9®®®(1)®

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

2 0 1 ® • ® CD CD • • ® ® ® ® ® © © © ® ® ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ®

2 3 ® CD CD

• ® • © ® ® ® (j)

® ®

CD First College ® Arts & Sciences

SU ® Management © Prof. Studies

FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. ® Law Enf./Crim. Just.

SP

--------------------c~: _er Not Applicable _c

The Instructor: Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... O 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria . .............................. O',,--,,--.,,_.,,----.. 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... O · 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully . ............................... O'~'""'·' _,,.--._ 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... 0" 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... 0 Q

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... O.O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ OQ rx· 00 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... 0 .Q 9 q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dens' work ................................ OQ.QOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .................... O Q e DO O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................................ O Q • O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. od•QOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... 0 Q e g 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

0 Excellent OVeryGood eGood OPoor OVery Poor

20. ow much have you I arned in this course?

Exceptional Amount Very Much Much Some Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

'""" -,: .. -,:: ·---e -~I -::: -Ci: -c -c ------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week

id you typically spend reparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less O 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good OGood 0 Satisfactory •Unacceptable

---

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan Ill Inst Le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University tlli'W{ffij

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to. improve the · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer .questions. on both side.s .. All responses are an nym us.


---------2 0 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

1 2 CD First College -® • ® ® ® Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• ® ® • • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -CV CV CV CV -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® =!~~;

Not Applicable -~=

The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... 0 i 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /:·. 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... 0 Q. 0 5. Made good use of community resources. . ........................................ 0 &;?. 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 cv.1 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ OQ '"'"00 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. OQ QOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... OQeOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ eQOQOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :· 0 Q 0 0

,.Ny/·i

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, 11:;r3

and sexual orientation ...................................................... oqeqoo 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! ......................................... OQ•QOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on st den ' work. . .............................. 0 · · 0 Q 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .................... · 0 Q 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................................ 0 0 Q 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr se nderstanding and application .............. O.O•QOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... GQOQOO


0 Excellent OVeryGood eGood OPoor OVery Poor




-,=--..-··--c --j· -i.f ..-··,.. -:~: -::: ··---.· ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week


24. How would you rate the quality -

for understanding the subject? every 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 • 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVeryGood OGood 8 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---


A. What did you like about the course/instructor? -;c




Printed in USA • OMR. Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropol_itd.:1J. 0 Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty 1lliWfITT'l

Metropolitan. State. University would like in onn ti on and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continu.ed efforts to improve the ic lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.


---------2 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

0 1 2 ''2J CD First College -® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences -



• @ @ • • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP

• ® ® ® ® CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

l Not Applicable

J Never J, · ' ' •> · i:Jseiaoiit

l J ·. . . Sometimes \~

The Instructor: l '· ;,~frLZ:~~;· ~~~~!~,r~ :~~) 1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... O Q 0 Q' 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • .Q 0 O 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources. . ........................................ 0 Q 0 Q 0 • 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... . e O 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ eQOQ

1

00 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. •OOQOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... e Q 0 g 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. ........................................ - l•Q 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .:f~ ~:~\~

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... O~O Q 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work. . .............................. lit O 0 O 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . .................... e g O g O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement iP, lea ning. . ................................ lilll!Q 0 9 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. GDQOQOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0


$Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor




-----.·-··-· --··._. --u~ -u~ -c -cs: _c _c ------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? I/I Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? O!Very Good OiGood •iSatisfactory O. Unacceptable

---

Metropol.it~ II Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty ~1mmcJ

Metropolitan State University would like in rm ti on and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.


---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 2 CD First College -® • ® ® a> Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use vs or Xs to mark choices.


• @ @ • © Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


• ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable Never

,_:, J

The Instructor: l~.,. .___ ____ AI_w--=.ays ~;;

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 . Q 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... 0. 0 D 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval~atio criteria. . ............................. 0 rl 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized manmer. . .................................... 0 ~ 0 00 0 5. Made good use of community resources. . ........................................ 0 ·· .. 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly ..................................................... 0 OQOO 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ Or@OQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. O~opoo 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... 0 9 0 Q 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... 0 9 0 D 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. ......................................... 0 ~ 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ;a ;~,

and sexual orientation ...................................................... 01·.0000 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... 0: "0 ·p 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st den ' work. . .............................. 0 • 0 () 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies ...................... ·olJOOOO 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning .................................. o•o()OO 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr se nderstanding and application .............. o•oaoo 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... 0 ()OO


0 Excellent OVery Good

GGood OPoor OVery Poor


Exceptional Amount 'Wery Much Much Some Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? et es ONo

----=~ ··--:;"" --·-··--::: --J: -u _,:_ _c(

..--··-_c ------------------------22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?

23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


<alvery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? OVery Good

<tDGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Metropolitan II Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University 1ill'Wt1Tij

Metropolitan State University would like in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.


• Answer questions on both sides.

•

The Instructor:

C6)@@®® CDCD®CDCD @@@@@ ®®®®® ©©©©© ®®®®® ®®®®® (J) (J) (J) (J) (J)

®®®®® ®®®®@


2 0 1 2 CD First College ® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management

• @ @ • © Prof. Studies ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®


,. st:itt:i:iffi. Sometimes -;~,,~',

.. ;. ..!~:.: J!~:fi~.Y .... ·.·•.t - _,, (;:;;;:

L__ ____ Al_w-=ays &~::i .::;;~ 1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • 0 0 O. 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... e:Qopoo 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 ··•·• 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •OO 00 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... e Q 0 · 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track ................................................... , •ao ·oo

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ e:Qo '.00 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 . 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , gender, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, :i~

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ •OO 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... • Q 0 ,., 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dens' work ................................ eOOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e Q 0 Q 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OOQOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. eDOQOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? e>Yes ONo

--------------------o( -ff -c _, -·:_ .. --· ... -,._ _;_. _;. .. _ -o( -.·-·--c ------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? every 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less O 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good ClllGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---




Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions. Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR. Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan 1(1 Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University tlli'ITT1T[i

Metropolitan State University would like .in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used iii our continued efforts to improve the c · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.



0 1 2 CD First College -® • ® ® ® Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use Vs or Xs to mark choices.


• ® ® • ® Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ®Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


• ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable

Never ·.· .c:.•·sejtl~w;

The Instructor: ~~;Fj" ~ 1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e q O q O O 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s ........................................ •OOOOO 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • p 0 .p• 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... •OOyOO 5. Made good use of community resources. . ........................................ e Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly .....................................................• Q.OQOO 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •,QOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. •.QOQOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. . ........................................ e Q 0 y 0 0

<":, 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, '~~, >·)

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ • () 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q. 0 Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on st~den s' work. . ............................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti~e to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Q O () 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement ip leaning .................................. 0 0000 17. Designed assignments and tests to increase nderstanding and application .............. •boboo 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •Doqoo 19. How would you rate the overall

performance of this instructor? eExcellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the se.cond meeting? eves.

ONo

-----cs: -rr -r ·-_, -c -c --): _:..r ..--;:;;: -:~.:: -:::: ·-------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? 6Very Good OGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---






Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan 0 Instlc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.


---------2 0 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

1 2 CD First College -•@•@@ CDeCDCDCD ®®®®® ®®®®® ©©©©© ®®®®®

@ • @ @ ® Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• ® ® • © Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

• 6@@@@@

7 cvcvcvcvcv s@®@@• 9®®®•®

® @

CV ® ®

® ® @ @

CV CV ® ® ® ®

® ® SP @

CV ® ®

Not Applicable

The Instructor: · · .;;,;~·~;};;.,;"" ~c;p:~,J.1~~~~ Always ~;~;~

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... •O 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... • Q 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. • Q 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... • Q 0 5. Made good use of community resources. . ........................................ 0 Q • 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 .. s 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ •OoQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . .................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter. ......................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , ge der, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .:: ; ·,o;;:

and sexual orientation ....................................................... •Q:OQOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written ~esponses ~n ~t~den s' work ..... _. .. : ......................... •9 .. ::;ob····.:·.,oo 15. Informed students of their progress m t1r~r to orrect def1c1enc1es. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning .................................. •OOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. •OOQOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... ec'.JOQOO


•Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

-----er.: -ff

"" -,.-·-_, -c -·:_ --~~ -~ -ii -..-._ -.···-------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week





of the classroom space? OVery Good eGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

c ional Improvement Questionnaire -

Metropolitan State University would like in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an riym us.


--------2 0 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

1 2 CD First College -@ • @ @ @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.


• @ @ • ~Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


• ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®


The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0

~: ~;~!:~~~ ~~;:~;~i~u:~~~~t~i;~~ ~:~ :~'.o .c.ri~~~i~ ... · .· ." ." .· ." ." ." ." ." : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 0 g g g g 5. Made good use of community resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly .................................................... OQOQOO 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ 0-0QOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. •QOQOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 0000

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ o:·. OQOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .•.:'.: r:~ ..

and sexual orientation. . ...................................................... • Q 0 QO 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! ......................................... •QOQOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on st den s' work. . .............................. 0 ~. 0 Q 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to orrect deficiencies. . .................... · 0: · Q 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................................ 0 .. 0 O 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q 0 0 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... ~QOQOO


•Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor OVery Poor



21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? OYes ONo

-----ix -rr .. --·._ ,.... -.:__ ::

·._ --.. -·--· .... -c -i}

-c -c ------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week


24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

f/IVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less e 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? GVery Good OGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---



r-tott>~ ~Y?>·f(~_q,~v/ l.,,l\,-tcl ~f'I~ -fr; ( .ex.p(RJV\11-ij'



Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • www,sur-sys,com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan II Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in. our continued efforts to improve the c rric lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer· questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices.


•


2 0 1 2 3 CD First College ® • ® ® @ Arts & Sciences CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management

• @ @ • © Prof. Studies ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® 0 0 0 0 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

--------------------o: -ff

Not Applicable -c -'"· -c -··-

The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 .~ 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... 0 O. . . . 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria ............................... ogegoo 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... 0 Q Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 Q • Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly .................................................... OfOQOO 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ OQ•QOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. O.fl:OQOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... OQ•OOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student ........................................ OrtOOOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0

--, -(

-'"" : ... ::.

--·--c -------12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ~.~1 • .~ •• ~· and sexual orientation ........................................................ tPQOQOO

13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... 0 Q • Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on stlflden s' work. . .............................. 0 Q 0 I 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in timle to orrect deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 p p O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning .................................. 00.QOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase [nderstanding and application. . ............ 0 ~ 0 Q 0 0 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •QOQOO

19. How would you rate the overall 20. ow much have you 21. Did you receive a syllabus

----------performance of this instructor? I arned in this course? by the second meeting? -O Excellent Exceptional Amount e Yes -O Very Good Very Much 0 No -•Good Much -O Poor Some -O Very Poor Little --22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?


for understanding the subject? &Very 0 Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All

3 or Less • 11 to 15 4 to 6 0 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? 0 Very Good eGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---



~ co,tf.L I/VOS Ov ~ Y'ArthcrJS drtS ~ ·~ Cl.fiPGl~On ~ ~ \nDJ.fN~J!L ~lu-1\ShLGcQ .~ '\J\lLS°; \~~\ \OL£ -tt)

Lvnd.WSlv,,nol ~ tM- Sh>YGt OJvvJDJ-n+ o~ ~n .





Metropolitan a Instrlc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University [i!ci'c'cmJ

Metropolitan State University would like in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in.our continued efforts to improve the c ·c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides, All responses are an nym us.


---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 2 CD First College -•@®®® CDeCDCDCD CDCDCDCDCD ®®®®® ©©©©© ®®®®® ®®®®®

® • ® ® CD Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use ti's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• CD CD • © Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® ® FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


• 7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)

®®®®~ 9®®®9®

® ® (j)

® ®

® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

® ® SP -® -(j) -® -® -c~: -rr

Not Applicable -c

The Instructor: Always ~.;e;;;

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... OQ O 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... ODO 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. 0 Q 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... 0 Q 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... 0 Q, 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... oj}o .. · 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ 0.0QOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond Give o learning ............................. 0.0QOO 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... OQ•QOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 Q • Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 0 O , .. 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, :!•::·

and sexual orientation ........................................................ OQ8' 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! . . ....................................... 0 Q 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dens' work ................................ 0(:5, ,,.,. 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O t:5 • O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning .................................. OQ•QOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. OQOQeO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 000~00


0 Excellent OVeryGood •Good 0 Poor 0 Very Poor

20. ow much have you earned in this course?


21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ~Yes ONo

-==--c -c --~·; -;::: -ii -c --·--._ ------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? OVery @Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All


of the classroom space? OVery Good •Good 0 Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---



~Y\Yl~ i Yl 5 fhA c..:-roV,


5 YI o u \ d pV\) 0 i cle ~) Y 0-.ol e \)YD/ ye S') -Po v- S' f-i.,t.clLn t-s. lo D Y'<\U Ch V~' °'-<:fl YI .:rs ,


Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan D Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the c · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.


• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use ll's or Xs to mark choices.


•

2 ® CD

• ® ® ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® CD • @ @

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

2 1 CD First College ® @ Arts & Sciences CD CD SU ® Management

• • Prof. Studies ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. ® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® CV ® ®


Sometimes ·ii ~:::~~,-~

The Instructor: ,;; .,:,: ;,,';~~~;!~~~ ::~ 1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e Q Od 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s ........................................ eOOOOO 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria ............................... •QOQOO 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ..................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources ......................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly .................................................... epoqoo 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully ................................ eQOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning ............................. ff ., OQOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . yOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... • QO 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to ag , g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. ;~~

and sexual orientation ........................................................ • ·.oaoo 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! ......................................... epot}oo 14. Provided helpful written responses on stlflden s' work. . .............................. 0. 0 5 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in time to orrect deficiencies. . .................... • q 0 Q 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i leaning .................................. •Qo900 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. •QOQ.00 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 y 0 0


•Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor

20. ow much have you learned in this course?


21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

---------------------!~:; -'"' -(

--c~· -.i -( -::n: _,:_

--·------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week id you typically spend reparing for class?



3 or Less 0 11 to 15 4 to 6 • 16 or More 7 to 10

of the classroom space? 0 Very Good •Good O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---



~ f!ea_j({J~ µe,/ & y- /,{._ ,{//.es J ra4-<.- ~f'..r f,

====---=- (( }ectrn-eJ A_ /o Ir ./


CJu,J //At7~ .s~µ~s;S


Printed in USA• OMR. Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Metropolitan D Instr c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University [i[ci:'c'c cc c 1

Metropolitan State University would like in rm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the c · c lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an nym us.



0 1 2 3 CD First College -•@•@@ CDeCDCDCD ®®®®® ®®®®® ©©©©© ®®®®® ®®®®®

® • ® ® ® Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V"s or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• ® ® • @ Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -


The Instructor:

7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)

®®®® 9®®®8®

® ® (j)

® ®

® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

® ® SP ® (j)

® ®


:;:·;: ;;·:·se\dQ)!i:;: Sometimes ::;.~:

, _, ,;~"-: )':]J~ualiy"-, ':';' _'.{:~~~ ~-cs:x,,,;, "-),',::_,,,,,,_,,, ,,,,_.,::}<·~- ·;_:j,,",<

.___ ____ Al_w--"ays 'i•r' ;;:1·, 1. Stimulated student thinking ................................................... O.OQOO 2. Explained course objectives and outcom s. . ...................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eval atio criteria. . ............................. 0 D · 0 4. Presented material in an organized man er. ...................................... 0 :(j .. 0 0 5. Made good use of community resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·· 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QOO 7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp ctfully. . .............................. 0 Q 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond cive o learning. . ........................... 0 .. ,d Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... O.~OQOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · ·.·· Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter ......................................... 0 · q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, T

and sexual orientation. . ...................................................... 0 ,,.; Q 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and careful! ......................................... O~OQOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on st dens' work ................................ OQ0.00 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e to correct deficiencies ...................... · OOOQ;O 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i lea ning. . ................................ 0 if 0 Q 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to incr ase nderstanding and application .............. 09oqoo 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... •ooqoo 19. How would you rate the overall

performance of this instructor? 0 Excellent OVery Good •Good OPoor OVery Poor

20. ow much have you earned in this course?



-----): _rr -·=--0:--.. --::: -··--::t -1 ...l

-c -cs: -c -c ------------------------22. How important was class attendance 23. ow many hours per week



for understanding the subject? every OSomewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All


of the classroom space? OVery Good OGood e Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---



'

fl/\ Sf\1'111.( foI- Uti)


l~e co tJ-.f5e l/JGtS vry a\~~ ;c~Jf 1:rely JlAe_ f c) . I

+be IA ~""~)f ~o~S 51llPl~trtS , ·~

w {9 "'' J (' ; _,_. '::>~ r/j-c f1 ~OIJ

0\lf( +ex+1~00K V'('tji:; 5 t\5 ~e/p s-tlA~) lit h.d-e rSt~"'(~ flie_

Yl-l~f ev;C\\ bef.fer.



Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• wv.w.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011 - Kerry s kleyman phd€¦ · 1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011...

Documents

Transcript of 1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011 - Kerry s kleyman phd€¦ · 1Q Results: Course Level Fall 2011...