1989 - Section 15...

55
SECTION 15 SUBMITTAL FISCAL YEAR 1989 TOTAL ANNUAL BOARDINGS BY FlSCAl YEAR (IN UIWONS) 550 : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 · : : : : : : : ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 ......... ; : ; : ; : : : : . . . . . . . . . . : : : . : : : : : : 412 UIWON : : : : : : : : : . 400 · : : : , ..: : : : : : . . . . . . . 350 · .... . : : : : : : : : : m a N n ro m ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro m m m m m m m m m m m ..... - .....-- .....-- .....-- .....-- .....-- ..-- ...- ..-- S!.R.T.D. LIBRARY

Transcript of 1989 - Section 15...

Page 1: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

SECTION 15 SUBMITTAL FISCAL YEAR 1989

TOTAL ANNUAL BOARDINGS BY FlSCAl YEAR (IN UIWONS)

550 : : : : .

. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .500 · : : : : : : : ~., ~ ;

. . .

. . .

. . . . . . .450 ......... ; : ; : ; : : : :. . . . . . . . . .

: : : . : : : : : : 412 UIWON: : : : : : : : : .400 · : : : , ..: : : : : : ~

. . . . . . .350 · .. . . . : : : : ~ : : : : :

m a ~ N n ~ ~ ~ ~ ro m ~ ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro m m m m m m m m m m m ~ ~ .....- .....-- .....-- .....-- .....-- .....-- ..-- ...- ..- ­

~~RTD

S!.R.T.D. LIBRARY

Page 2: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

,.:;;,~. i~. ;"I.;:H;

G.:;r-,-:::ral r"\~ailager

NOV 31989

Urban Mass Transportation AdministrationOffice of Grants ManagementAudit Review and Analysis Division (UGM-13) 400 Slve~th S~reet, :.W., ~uom 93:5 Washington, D.C. 20590

Section 15 Report

Ger.tlemen:

In compliance with your requirements, we are submitting our Section 15 Reportfor Fiscal Year 1989. The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Statement, the Ch i ef Execut i ve Offi cer (CEO) Cert ifi cat i on and the aud itors / Sect ion 9 Certification are included. A statement of validity for the samplingprocedures utilized was included in the Fiscal Year 1988 Section 15 Report and a copy of that statement is also transmitted herewith.

If you need additional information, please contact Larry Schlegei, Director of Management and Budget, at (213) 972-4370.

Sincerely,

~qJg~f?J Attachments

cc: Neil Peterson, LACTC

RD:js SECT15.DOC

Southern Calltomla Rapid Transit District 425 South Main Stre"t, Los Angeles, California 90013 (213) 972·6000

Page 3: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

RTO

'!d~HI ;... :Jt..~g

Gere-"i ~anager

hOV 3 1989

Urban Mass Transportation AdministrationOffice of Grants ManagementAudit Review and Analysis Division (UGM-13)400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 9315 Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Sirs:

I hereby certify to the following concerning the financial and non-financial/operating data submitted in the Southern California RapidTransit District Section 15 Report for its fiscal year ending July 1, 1989:

1. The financial and non-financial/operating data (1) are accurate and truthful records of the financial transactions and operations of the Southern California Rapid Transit District and (2) conform in all material respects wi th the account i ng and defi nit iona1 requ i rements of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration's (UMTA) Uniform System of Accounts and Records and Reporting System.

2. The verifications below pertain to each data item to be used in the Section 9 formula allocation. (These data include fixed guidewaydirectional route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and operating costs.) I verify:

a. that a system is in place for recording data in accordance with UMTA definitions; that the correct data are being measured (e.g., vehicle revenue miles as opposed to total vehicles miles) and that no systematic errors exist (i.e., all data are recorded);

b. that a system is in place to record data on a continuing basis and that data gathering is an on-going effort;

c. that source documents are available to support the reported data and are rna inta ined for a mi nimum of three years and that data are fully documented and securely stored;

d. that a system of internal controls is in place to assure the accuracy of the data collection process and recording system and that reporteddocuments are not altered and that documents are reviewed and signedby a supervisor, as required;

Southern California Rapid Transit District 425 South Main Street. Los Angeles, California 90013 (213) 972·6000

Page 4: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Iban Mass TransportatiGn Administration ;'3<:: Two

e. that the data co 11 ect i on methods are those suggested by UMTA or equivalent; that UMTA standards for precision and accuracy have been satisfied in that the sampling technique has either been approved by UMTA or, in advance of the UMTA approval, by a stat i st i ca1 expertserving the agency and confirmation that the collection methods documented are being followed; and ~

f. that the data are accurate; and that document of an analytic review of the reported data confirms that data are consistent with prior reporting periods and other facts known about agency operations.

3. The accounting system from which this Section 15 Report is derived, follows the accounting system prescribed by the Section 15 Uniform System of Accounts and Records. The Southern California Rapid Transit District h:.s .Gopted th= Unifcrl!l System of A.:c:lunts and Records and has previouslysubmitted a Section 15 Report for its fiscal yp.ar ending June 27, 1987 which was compiled using the Uniform System of Accounts and Records and which contained an independent auditor's Section 15 financial data certification signed by Deloitte Haskins & Sells and dated October 26, 1987.

SU~~~'?:/f ~: Pegg

Page 5: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

$~f!1!).,~,: IOUTHE~n CAUFORnlA

. AllOCIATlOn OF GOVERnmEnT/'-' " '. ~ :!tes, California 90017 ...., (213) 236·1800 • FAX (213) 236·1825

'resldenl '!i\. 'ntono-icft. Sur~",'uor,

,=. An~eles C ounl~

=", Vice Pre~ldent October 10, 1989 ,'?In>tine Rttd. c.)"ncWn,·m~,

>.lota ~onlca

... .: '.'l:-e Pr:~;dcnt

,.-,n ~1)'lU'. 5lif'<~"UiJr

',,:ura COUIlI)

?" .. ::- :;j~n~

-"~l Grifrt.:,. Cowu:i..tmemM. ·',i.:na Park

Mr. Alan F. Pegg:-,"al Coun"

.b. Se2bo1t. S~Uor General Manager .-', "'n'les (""n,) Sou~hern Ca11~ornia R!pid Tr~rr,it District o.-arw Dana. S.."muor 425 South Main Street 0rJn2e Counl'; Los Angeles, CA 90013

. t' ~',·~:-,i!. ~""~~"':i.sn'

R"e~ide County K~~ Cmnf'O'. S.."miwr Dear Mr. Pegg: "-sn Be"".rdono Counl~ ]or "fikris., Swpmuor As required by the Section 15 reporting requirements (Federal ( lf Impenal County Register, September 15, 1987), the Southern California Association of i'jUbe riHetJJ Governments (SCAG), serving as the Metropolitan Planning Organization, City of lo> An~eles is hereby providing for you the following information. For theTom Bnd~. Mcl'Yor Lo. An~ele) Southern California Rapid Transit District the operational service

area square miles and population within the Los Angeles-Long Beach Lo, An~eles and Riverside/San Bernardino Urbanized Area is as follows: Il.uile.t FarniL. ~UWlCUJl m. ,;: :..." An~ele,

Gloria Molina. COUlICumt'mm.

Operational Service Area Square Miles - 1443.2 Cil) of Lonll Beach Operational Service Area Population - 7,176,819'>arm« Smith. Councilmml/:wr, , , " I'>c:..:h

(,{,,, of Rive,,"de County These figures were developed utilizing SCAGls Geographic Information .~..... ~~:. ::....... "'.:.:..~~ .•:-:,"'-4.•• System and the operatorls tr~ns1t system m~p~. Se~v1ce ~~eas ~ere

digitized around non express bus lines using street and/or census C,IteS of San Bemardino County JACl LonrifIe, Mu\'or tract boundaries as guidelines via SCAGs Geographic Information R,.IIO Systems. By definition, any tract containing transit routes except C IlleS of Ventura County express·service, was included where the route was contiguous.John Melton. CounClJmt'rn/:wr. s.nla Paula

Please contact Rosemary Ayala if further information is required.CIlles of Oranlle CounlY Irwin Fried. Coucumnnbn: Yorba Linda Sincerely, , •• ·tAilt••. U£:Li..;,.. ll.'o ,4 JltCiU 8achanlch, MIJ\'Of. ~ • RandlO Palos Verdes' J-.. ~(

- C R*rt Gmln, MiJ\Ur, / uguna Beach' JAMES R. GOSNELL, Director

"~bu~r. C"ur:nlmm,M. Transportat ion P1anni ng ) Valley

;",penal Coumy c Jan~ ·'-ogd. Su(lt''''lSOr. Los Angel.- County c Edmund EMlman. SU(lt'"uor and Ptlrr Schabllnam. S~uor. Ol1lnge County cGoodcli VasqlleZ.""'UIOI'. R"e,.."de COllmy c Mdba Dunlap, Su(lt'IVisor. San Bernardino County c Larry Walka-•. Su(lt''''lSOr. Ventura COUnl~ 0 Juna .~hn1y, SupnvutN. CIlJeS of.lmpenal County c Rc. fI,dri,lun. CoUnCl!rnt'I':bt'r. Weslmoreland. C,t.es of Los Angeles Counly c Vaont. C,Iles of R.ve~,de County. Ridaard Deinu'Cft'. Jr~ Mayor. Corona. CIIICS of Orange County 0

~'ohn Kana'. M<lwJT Pro Tt'm. C)'press • Cities of San Bernar~,"o Count)' c Larry Rhinhar1. Ma;ior Montcla,r. ClUes or Venlul1l County c Frank Mc:Dr\'ttl, Co~. Ojai 0

Richard Aialoc-ft. CounciJmt'mbt'r. Los Angeles. \tiehul \\00. (ounnlmmtbn: Los Angeles. Joy Piaas. Co~. Los Angeles. Long aeac:ll 2nd Position Vacanl • VIdli II_ani, COUlk'ilnv'm'-. SimI Valley. Robrn Bartlrtt. Mayor. Monrovia. Ruthd)lI P1\1111111ft'. M~.", Pro TtIIl, ~wpOl1 Bach

Page 6: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

.~

A1uitlsysfems, Inc. 617·86':;·5& iO

July 11, 1988

Mr. Ronald J. Fisher Director, Information Services Staff Office of Technical Assistance S~~tio"1 1S, URT- 7 400 7th Street,. SW Room 6419 Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. Fisher:

Multisystems, together with Northeastern University, .. has reviewed the sampling program and estimation procedures used by the Southern California Rapid Transit District for esti~ating unlinked passenger trips and passenger-miles, and has found them to yield unbiased estimates whose accuracy exceeds UMTA's accuracy standard of ± 10% precision at a 95% confidence level; in fact, the sample size is so large that, combined with the revenue-based estimation used, the precision at the 95% confidence level is belrw 2llt-

Should you desire further documentation of our findings, please consult the Final Report under Contract #4688 prepared by us for SCRTD, "in which the precision level is calculated (see Table 5) to be 1.7%.

Sincerely,

~rJ#lw17fJ Peter G. Furth Associate Professor of Civil Engineering Northeastern University

Page 7: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FORM 001

TRAf~SlT SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION SCHEDULE

Fiscal Year End rn [QIl] [illTransit ID Month o.y Y••,

't t m name saJrnER'l CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRIC!' 1. ransl sys e : ...... _T

2. Transit system address: 425 so. MAIN S'l'REE'r

Street address (' City LCS MaLES

State CALlFORtV-A Zip Code 90013

3. Person to be contacted regarding this report: RUBIN 'I01 last Name First NCime and Initial(s)

Title _c:::N'ffi}L_r..:_'"::r_·_-~_·R _

( 213) 972 6830Telephone area code number extension

4. Reporting Level.

~ R - Required Level

D A - A Leve! (Voluntary)

D B - B Level (Voluntary)

[I C - C Level (Voluntary)

5. Type of organization: (Check one only)

A. Public agency or authority which directly operates all transit service (not a State DOT)

D B. ~ Public agency or authority which contracts for some or all transit service (not a State DOT)

D C. State Department of Transportation

o D. Private carrier under contract to one or more public agenci~s

D E. Private carrier not under contract to a public agency

D F. Other (describe on Form 005)

10-25-89Date Prepared Date Updated

Page 8: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

tORM CO2 Page OJ of D.:J CONTRACTUAL F~ELATIONSHIPIDENTIFICATION SCHEDULE

(Us~ as many pagM as necessary)

Level ~Transit 10 lliJill Mode{s) Me

Fiscal Year End llil [0 I 1J[ill "'~ 0:.:.'1 :.. ~ r••,

1. Name of contractor·: County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles PhiJ.l1arm:nic AsSOCiation

Rc.cd Depa.rt;rent, P. o. Box 40892. ;"ddress Los AngelesCity

State california Zip Code _9_o_o5_1 _

Name of contact person: ____ _san I_to3. Title S~pervising Civil Engineer

Telephone 213 226 8311 area code number extension

4. Agency in Item 1 is: o A. Public agency contracting for transit servicE:

DB. Other public agency providing transit service under contract

CJ C. Private carrier providing transit service under contract

Do. Private carrier contracting for transit service

DE. Other (describe on Form 005)

5. Nature of contractual relationship (check all boxes that apply):o A. Cash reimbursement of some or all of contract carrier's operating deficit

o B. Cash payment to contract carrier for specific mass transportation services

Dc. Cash reimbursement to contract carrier for reduced fare programs

Do. Vehicles given, loaned, or leased for below market value to contract carrier

DE. Other. Explain monetary consideration received and obligations incurred by contract carrier on Form 005

6. Number of vehicles operated in maximum service under 70contract by mode:

7. Contract amount by mode: S 406,000 $ $ _

8. Revenues retained by mode: [KJ yes Dna

If yes, actual amount on annual basis $203,000 S S _

*If report is by or for contractor operating 50 or more vehicles, this should be the name of the public ~g~ncy cor.tracting for s.ervice.

Date Prepared _1_0_/2_5_1_8_9__ Date Updated _

Page 9: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FOIM OOZ PItt CD of QJ CONTRACTUAt r.,tAnONSHIP IDENTlFtCAnON SCHEDULE

.i~n~itIO

(Use as fNny

~

~ IIMCNary)

level

Fi~al Year End ffi2) [ill] [UIJ ~ ~o>V Y••,

Mode(s)

1­ Name of contractor*: Q~NITRANS

1700 west 5th Street2. Address San BernardinoCity

State California Zip Code _9_2_4_1_1 _ ~

Richard A. Teichert3. Name of contact person: Director of AccountinaTitle

Telephone 7_1_4--:- 88_9-:-- --:-__0_8_1_1-,-- -'--_ area code number extension

4. Agency in Item 1 is: ~ A. PL:bHc agercy ':I')ntracting for tr,nsit servi('~

DB. Other public agency providing transit sefVice under contract

Dc. Private carrier providing transit service under contract

Do. Private carrier contracting for transit service

DE. Other (describe on Form 005)

5. Nature of contractual relationship (check all boxes that apply):

D A. Cash reimbursement of some or all of contract carrier's operating deficit

[i] B. Cash payment to contract carrier for specific mass transpoltation services

Dc. Cash reimbursement to contract carrier for reduced fare programs

Do. Vehicles given, loaned, or leased for below market value to contract carrier

o E. Other. Explain monetary consideration received and obligations incurred by contract carrier on Form 005

- 6. Number of vehicles operated in maximum service under contract by mode:

7. Contract amount by mode: $1,243,470$ $ _

8. Revenues retained by mode: [!J yes c::Jno If yes, actual amount on annual basis S 414,490 S S _

'* If report is by or for contractor operating 50 or more vehicles. this should be the name of the public i'~"(y contracting for service.

Date Prepared _ Date Updated _

S.C·.R.T.D. LIBRARY

42

Page 10: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FORM 002 ,. m of OJ COrrrrJ.:.cr'..JP.~f!CLATlONSHIP IDENTIFiCATION SCHEDULE

(U~ M m.ny paOfi IS ne<euary)

·iu;.nsit 10

Fiscal Year End

[9" 012 I i] 02J [ill [UTI ",. ~ . ., ! . r••,

level

Mode(s)

~

MI3

1. Name of contraetor*: Orange County Transit District

2. Address 11222 Acacia Par~vav. P.O. Box 3005 Garden Grove City

State California Zip Code _9_~_64_2 _

3. Name of contact person: Titie

Telephone 7_1_4-..,.- -=-97-::1-;-- ~-___:6-3-53_:__--------area (ooe number extension

4. Agency il1 Item 1 is: ~ 1\. Public agency contracting f"r tr(\n!i~ service

DB. Other public agency providing transit service under contract

Dc. Private carrier providing transit service under contract

Do. Private carrier contracting for transit service

DE. Other (describe on Form 005)

5. Nature of contractual relationship (check all boxes that apply):o A. Cash reimbursement of some or all of contract carrier's operating deficit

~ B. Cash payme.lt to contract carrier for specific mass transportation services

Dc. Cash reimbursement to contract carrier for reduced fare programs

Do. Vehicles given, loaned, or leased for below market value to contract carrier

DE. Other. Explain monetary consideration received and obligations incurred by contract carrier on Form 005

~ 6. Number of vehicles operated in maximum service under 35contract by mode:

7. Contract amount by mode: $1.080·.13T:S $ _

8. Revenues retained by mode: [K] yes Dno If yes, actual amount on annual basis $.:-.360,044- $ $ _

, * If report is by or for contractor operating SO or more vehicles, this should be the name of the public agency contracting for service.

Date Prepared 10-27-89 Date Updated _

Page 11: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FOr:M 002 Page [TI of CU CONTRACTU.t..L ::-:E!....ATIONSHIP lOENTIFlCATION SCHEOULE

(Use as many pages as necessary)

level G Mode(s) ~IB

,. Name of contractor*: SOuthern California Rapid Tra~sit District

2. ,Address ~:5 S. ~~in Street Los AngelesCity

State California Zip Code 90013

-.J. Name of contact person: Thomas A. Rubin

Title Controller-Treasurer 972-6830Telephone (213)

----:a""':"re:-:a~c:-:,J-:-:'-::-~ . .)e-:'r:-------:e::xt:-:e":""llS~lo':'"I:-'------- ­.. -----:n::-:u'::rr.:""':

4, Agency In Item 1 is: iX J A. Public agency contracting for transit service

U B. Other public agency providing transit service under contract

Dc. Private carrier providing transit service under contract

Do. Private carrier contracting for transit service

D E. Other (describe on Form 005)

5. Nature of contractual relationship (check all boxes that apply): [J A. Cash reimbursement of some or all of contract carrier's operating deficit

jX !B. Cash payment to contract carrier for specific mass transportation services

Dc. Cash reimbursement to contract carrier for reduced fare programs

Do. Vehicles given. loaned, or leased for below market value to contract carrier

o E. Other. Explain monetary consideration received and obligations incurred by contract carrier on Form 005

6. Number of vehicles operated in maximum service under 73contract by mode:

7. Contract amount by mode: $2,23LIOO$ $ _

8. Revenues retained by mode: rn yes Dno If yes, actual amount on annual basis $. 743.700 $ $ _

"« If report is by or for contractor operating SO or more vehicles, this should be the name of the public agency c:ontraeting for S4trvice.

10-27-89 Date Updated _Date Prepared

Page 12: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

fOIM fa .... L.lJ. L2.J CONn:AC11.ttt f:ELA11ONSW" IOEPmFlCAnoN KHEOUU

{Ute as m.anr SN9ft as MCNary)

lev~1';it~l&sitlD [9 rOJ 211:] Mode(s)

Fi~1 Year End rn rn rn H~"'''''' C':' r..,

,. Name of contractor*: Riverside Transit Agency

1825 Third Street2. Addr~ RiversideCity

State California Zip Code _9-2-5-07-- _

Steve Oller3. Name of contact person:

~an.ager of Contract ServicesTitle Telephone 714 684 0850

---:a-re:-::a-'~od~e-----n";"um~be":"r----~--.-xt':'e":;';n;:':s;-io-n--------

4. Agency in Item 1 is: o A. Public ag :mcy:cr.~ractin9 fc r transit sCrJ:ce

DB. Other public agency providing transit service under contract

Dc. Private carrier providing transit service under contract

Do. Private carrier contracting for transit service

DE. Other (describe on Form 005)

S. Nature of contractual relationship (check all boxes that apply):o A. Cash reimbursement of some or all of contract carrier's operating deficit

GJ B. Cash payment to contract carrier for specific man transportation services

Dc. Cash reimbursement to contract carrier for reduced fare programs

Do. Vehicles given, loaned, or leased for below market value to contract carrier

DE. Other. Explain monetary consideration received and obligations incurred by contract carrier on Form 005

6. Number of vehicles operated in maximum service under 10contract by mode:

Contract amount by mode: S 682,162 S S _7.

8. Revenues retained by mode: [K] yes Dno If yes, actual amount on annual basis S 227,387 S S _

*If report is by or for contractor oper.ting SO Of' more whides, this should be the name of the public ~ncy contr.aing for s.ervice.

Date Prepared _ Date Updated _

Page 13: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FORM 003 Page Wef Q .~. ·.'1:y~U~1 SER\/ICE VE:-::CLES ~UMMARY SCHEDULE -- DIRECTLY OPERATED SERVICE

(U se as many pages as necessary)

f

Tr2 nc;it ID 1 9 Ia I ? ~_ 11 Fiscc::.1 Year End [Q]]] GIiJ GI9J

~onth Day

.. h r rl

!! ! I VEHICLEi~:el MODE TYPE

! I 0 i r·18 AB

! 02, r~B SA

r-;t- MR RR

04 I.~ f.. rJR

05

r-~6~ TOTAL

07

08 .

09

10

11

12

13

14

15 .,

16

17

18

I 19

r 20

I

Year

OWNERSHIP CODE

00

00

00

00

Level GJ

to

VEHICLES VEHICLES OPERATED IN AVAILABLE FOR

MAXIMUM SERVICE MAXIMUM SERVICE

33 40

1807 2202

99 127

0 lA

1939 ?~A7

Oate Prepared 09/15/89 Date Updated

Page 14: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FOR.r.~ 005 Page LiJ of C!:§] 5UPPLEMENTAllr~FORMATION SCHEDULE

Transit ID Level I R r Fiscal Year End

Menrh Day Year

i~ote: Use a separate page fur each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up

2. D Major service discontinuance

3. D Major new equipment or facilities

4. [J Fare change

5. D Strike

6. D Other major service interruption

7.· D "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002)

g. D"OJ \€. " contr;,:.ctt.a. I elatio.1!lhip (Form 002)

9. 0 Purchased transport3tion vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004)

10. 0 "Other" mode(s}, vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

11. D "Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

14. 0 Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

15. 0 Motol bus fixed guideway segments (Forms 006/403)

16. D Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

17. D "Other" reasons for days not operated (Forms 406/407)

18. D Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) ~

19.0 Other

Description of above, plus any other relevant information.

Fare Change

On July 1. 1989. a fare increase was implemented. Base Adult Cash Fare was increased from $0.85 to $1.10. Other fare categories were also affected.

Date Prep~red D~te Updated

Page 15: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

For.r.'005 Page LiJ of G:5J 5U PPLEr,'1 eNTAL If~FORMATION SCH EDULE

Level I R ·1Transit ID

\0.e: Use a separate pcge for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1 I. D Major service start-up

... £. o Major service discontinuance

3. o Major new equipment or facilities

4. I JFare change

5. o Strike

6. o Other major service interruption

7. o "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002)

8. C "ether" cOl1tiactual ;~Iatiorlship (Form 002)

Q.;. D Purchased transportation vehicles

discrepancy (Forms 002/004)

10. D "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

11 ~ [L] .Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/ii08)

12.0 Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

13·0 Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

14. 0 Fare revenue returned to reporter by pu rchased service contractor (300 series forms)

15.0 Motorbus fixed guideway segments (Forms 006/403)

16.0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

17. D "Other" reasons for days not operc1ted (Forms 406/407)

18. D Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) -.

19.0 Other

Description of-above, plus any o{her relevant information.

__Vehicle Type Discrepancy

FQr~ 003 reflects the vehicles available for maximum service during the peak season, while Form 408 provides the year-end inventory. Some of the buses

available during the peak season were later transferred to the contingency fleet Qr were removed for long term repair or were sold.

Cc:e PrCiJ~rcd C.:te Updated

Page 16: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Foru.'005 Page Gl of ~

SUPPLEr.~ENTAlIr~FORMATIONSCHEDULE

Transit ID ~•..

level c::.:.a=J ~;S':3! Year End !CI 7: ~

Month Day Year

i'Jo.E': Use a S2parate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up

2. o Major service discontinuance

3. o Major new equipment or facilities

4. D Fare change

S.. D Strike

6. o Other major service interruption

7. D "Other" ~rganizationtype (Forms 001/002)

... u. o "at j ?l'" contrac'.ual r€::a-.:ioil~hilJ

(Form 002)

9. D Purchased transportation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004)

10. D "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

11. D eVeh icle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

12. Q Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

14. D FClre revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

15. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments (Forms 006/403)

16.0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

17.0 "Other" reasons for days not operated (Forms 406/407)

18. D Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408)'

19. D Other

Description of above, plus any other relevant information.

Allocation of Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles, Passenger Miles, and Operating Expenses between Fixed and Non-Fixed Guideways: _

Actua J. Vehi cl e Reyenue Mil es

The Jfstrict first establishes the total actual vehicle revenue miles to be reported on Form 406 (row 4, column i). Total actual vehicle revenue

Date Prcp,-rcd D~~e Updated

Page 17: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

For-r.1005 Page W of [ill SUPPL~r.~HJTALIUFORMATION SCHEDULE

Transit 10 [i[QIill Level I R r Fiscal Year End GO !_.:J ... 1 GJjJ

Month Day

No ~r:: Use £J S€ par 2.te pag 2 fo r € cch a pplicabl e item below. Ch eck and d escri be 0 nly one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up 11.~ D cVehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. 0 Major service discontinuance 12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allo,cation methodology (Form 006)

3. 0 Major new equipment or facilities 13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. 0 Fare change 14. 0 Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

5. 0 Strike 15. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. 0 Other major service interruption

16. D Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. D "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002) 17.0 "Other" reasons for days not

operated (Forms 406/407) 8. D "Cth'2· n con~ract'JGl rc~.2tionsh;:J

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) ­

9. D Purchased transporUtion vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. 0 "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description of -above, plus any other relevant information. 1. (Cont'd)

miles are calculated using: {a} master trip scheduling database. (b) service added/cancelled using pink letters, (c) service provided to special events. and (d) loss in service due to non-availability of equipment, operator, equipment breakdown, etc. Vehicle revenue miles

arrrl1pd 00 fixed g,Jidelo.ay facjJities are calculated by first identifying

______~the bus lines operated on the fixed guideway facilities then multiplying

Date PrcfJ.::.rcd _ C.:.te Updated

Page 18: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

For:r.~ 005 Poge Q of G:.5J SUPPLE r,'1 Er~TAllr ~FOI1MA TION SCH EOULE

Transit ID Level W C;~C-3' V'=2r Er.d r " 1 8 I 91

MOf1rh Day Year ~! ~.: !

i;C,;tc: Use a separate pcSt: for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. 0 Major service start-up 11. D ~Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. D Major service discontinuance 12.0 Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

3. 0 Major new equipment or facilities' 13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. 0 Fare change 14.0 Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased ser'Jice contractor (300 series forms)

5. D Strike 15.0 rJ1otorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. 0 Other major service interruption

16.0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. 0 "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002) 17.0 "Other" reasons for days not

operated (Forms 40(/407) S. c=J "c ther" c.on'JJc.t"",al rclation::;r,ip

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) ­

9. 0 Purchased transportation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. 0 "Other" mode(s}, vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description of above, plus any o(her relevant information. 1 (Cootld)

the nllmber of tri ps operated on each 1 j ne by fj xed gui deway segments I

lengths. Resulting vehicle revenue miles are then subtracted from total actuGl vehicle revenue miles reported on Form 406 to derive the non-fixed guideway vehicle revenue mjles.

Date: Prcp.:.rc:d _ Du~e Updcted

Page 19: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

For:r.'! 005 Page Q of W SUPPLEr,'iENTAL Ir~FORMATION SCHEDULE

Transit ID LevelGJ 012 \ 11 CiT ~ IL..Q..L.L; (; i :i Month OJ)' Year

i-Jote: Use a separate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up

2. D Major service discontinuance

3. D Major new equipment or facilities

4. D Fare change

5. D Strike

6. D Other major service interruption

7. D "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002)

Z;. D "Othl?i" c0ntradual r~iatiorlship (Form 002)

9. D Purchased trans;Jortation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004)

10. D "Other" mode(s}, vehicle type(s}, or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

11.<'0 "Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

12.0 Fixed/non-fixed guideway allo.cation methodology (Form 006)

13.0 Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

14. D Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

15. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments (Forms 006/403)

16. D Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

17. D "Other" reasons for days not operated (Forms 406/407)

18. D Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) .

19. D Other

Description of-above, plus any other relevant information. 2. Passenger Miles

The District first establishes the system-wide annual unlinked passenger trips total to be reported on Form 406 (row 12, Column i). System-wide

unlinked passenger trips are estimated by surveying approximately 24%, 11. and 16% of the bus trips operated on an average weekday, Saturday, and Sunday Surveys are conducted throughollt the year in order to estimate annual average weekday, Saturday. and Sunday boardings. The District also conducts periodic ride checks on

Date Prepared Dz.te Updated

Page 20: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

For-r.~ 005 Page ["71 of ~

SU?PLEr..1tNTAL Ir!FORMATION SCHEDULE

Transit ID Level

I=isca! Year End Month OJy Year

Note: Use a separate page for each applicable item below, Check and describe only one item per page, Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up 11. D ~Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. 0 Major service discontinuance 12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form OOG)

3. 0 Major new equipment or facilities 13. 0 Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. 0 Fare change 14. D Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

s. 0 Strike 15.0 Motorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. 0 Other major service interruption

16. D Passenger mile dafa with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. D "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002) 17. 0 "Other" reasons for days not

oper~ted (Forms 406/407) 8. C '·Othe.." contractual,'t:latior.ship

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) -­

9. D Purchased transpcrtJtion vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. 0 "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Descrjgtion Qf above, plus any other relevant information.2. lCont'd)

lines operated on weekdays, Saturdays, and Sundays for scheduling and

planning purposes. Using the ride check d~tabase, average trip lengths for :oardings made on weekdays. Saturdays, and Sundays are estjmated. Passenger miles are computed by multiplying daily boardings with average tr"? length. Passenger miles carried on fixed guideway facilities are computed using the ride check database. Counted passengers on-board

Date PrcjJi:;red D~te Updated

Page 21: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Fora.~ 005 Page ~ of W SUPPLEr.'1ENTAL Ir~FORMATION SCHEDULE

Transit ID LevelWJLGIll ,-

I R r Fi<;cal Year End I I[QIJ I

u.J...lJ GGJ Month Day YeoJf

Note: Use a separate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up 11.~D "Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. D Major service discontinuance 12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allo,cation methodology (Form 006)

3. D Major new equipment or facilities 13.0 Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. 0 Fare change 14. D Fa~e revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

5. D Strike 15.0 Motorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. D Other major service interruption

16.0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. D "Other" organization type (Forms 0011002) 17. 0 "Other" reasons for days not

. operated (Forms 406/407) a. D "OH.tr" C.Oll trac.tual relationsl lip

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) ­

9. 0 Purchased transportation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. D"Other" mode(s). vehicle type(s). or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description of above, plus any ot'her relevant information. 2. LCont I d)

are multiplied by the distance to the next stop and the resulting passenger miles are summed over the fixed guideway segments. Passenger miles on fixed guideway segments are subtracted from the system-wide

______~p_assenger miles reported on Form 406 to arrive at the non-fixed guideway passenger miles.

Dc:te Updated

Page 22: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FOl\r.~ 005 Page LiJ of [W SUPPLEr,~ENTAL If~FOnMATION SCHEDULE

Transit ID Level c::iJ Fisca! Year End ~ ITI IT:l

LQ..Llj i C! l I L.lli...2.J Monrh Day Year

i,~ote: Use a separate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up 11. D .Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. 0 Major service discontinuance 12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

3. D Major new equipment or facilities 13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. 0 Fare change 14. 0 Fare revenue returned to reportei" by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

s. D Strike 1S. 0 Motorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. D Other major service interruption

16.0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. D "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002) 17. 0 "Other" reasons for days not

operated (Forms 406/407) 3. D "Other" contra~tud; relationship

(Form 002) 18. D Fleet total discrepancy(Form 408) -.

9. 0 Purch 'lsed transportation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19. D Other

10. D "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s} (Forms 003/004)

Description of above, plus any other relevant information.

3 Operatjng Expenses

The District first establishes the annual system-wide Operating Expenses to bp·reported on Form 301 (row 15. column f). The District utilizes a two-factor full cost allocation procedure to estimate the line level operating costS. The factors utilized are scheduled miles and scheduled

Date Prcpc;red C~te Updated

Page 23: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Fo~r.1 005 Page (iQ] of ~

SUPPLEr,~ENTALtr~FOnMATIONSCHEDULE

Transit ID LevelI 91 012 11 I W Fi-:cal Year End I ill 71 m [iIi]

Monch Day Year

Note: Use a separate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. 0 Major service start-up 11~ D ~Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. 0 Major service discontinuance 12.0 Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

3. D Major new equipment or facilities 13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. 0 Fare change 14. D Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

5. D Strike 1S. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. D Other major service interruption

16. 0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. 0 "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002) 17. 0 "Other" reasons for days not

operated (Forms 406/407) 1. 0 "Other" c)n·~rL.ctual r~IJtionship

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) -­

9. 0 Purchased transportation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. D "Other" mode(s}, vehicle type(s}, or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description Qf -above, plus any other relevant information. 3. (Contldl

hours of service. Using this cost allocation procedure, total operating expenses of lines operated on fixed guideway facilities are first estjmated. This total line level cost is then further split between fixed and non­fixed guideway costs depending upon the level of service on these segments. Once the total fixed guideway segment costs have been determined, they are subtra~tpd from the ~ystem-wide cost reported on Form 30] to arrive at the total non-fixed guideway operating costs.

DJtc: Prc:pcred Dz.te Updated

Page 24: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

For-r.' 005 Page LW of Gil SUPPLEr,'1ENTAL tr~FORMATION SCHEDULE

Tra:lsit ID (3JQ]-21iJ ..,-

Level UJ F;~ca! Year End IT] r-ri GGJ; • I :'

Month Od)' Year

Note: Use a separate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up 11. D ..Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. 0 Major service discontinuance 12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

3. 0 Major new equipment or facilities 13.0 Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. D Fare change 14.0 Fare revenue retu:-ned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

s. 0 Strike 1S. W Motorbus fixed guideway segments

. (Forms 006/403) 6. 0 Other major service interruption

16. D Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. D "Other" organization type (Forms 0011002) 17. 0 "Other" reasons for days not

operated (Forms 406/407) '3. D "·:)'.!l €." contructL.a. I elatio.1~hip

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) ­

9. D Purchased transportJ!ion vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. D "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description of above, plus any other relevant information.

Motorbus Fixed Guideway Segments:

1. Con~rolled Access Right-af-way Segments

The District operates bus lines on the El Monte Busway which is a ccntro)lpd access right-at-way tor motorbuses and hjgh occupancy motor vehicles (3+ persons). This east-west facility is in the median of

D~te Upccted

Page 25: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FOfU.'i 005 Page l.i2J of GiJ SU PPLHIt cNTAllr !FOr1MATION SCH EDULE

Transit ID Level I R

Fic;cal Year End rn Monrh O.q YeiJr

r\ute: Use a separate page for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up 11 ~ D .'vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

2. D ~,,1ajor service discontinuance 12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation . methodology (Form 006)

3. D Major new equipment or facilities 13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

4. D Fare change 14. D Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

s. D Strike 1S. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments

(Forms 006/403) 6. D Other major service interruption

16. D Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

7. 0 "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002) 17.0 "Other" reasons for days not

operated (Forms 406/407) S. C "ether" COilt.·actual : ~Iationship

(Form 002) 18. 0 Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) .­

9. D Purchased transportation vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004) 19.0 Other

10. D "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description of·above, plus any other relevant information. 1. (Contld)

San Bernardino Freeway (1-10) with one lane in each direction. The eastern end of thjs facjlity js the intersect jon of San Bernardjno Freeway and Santa Anita Avenue. The western end of this facility is at M1ssion Road and Eliott Street, where the San Bernardino Freeway passes over Mission Road before crossing the Los Angeles River. The length of this segment, both directions, is 21.6 miles.

Date Pre [Jared Dz.te Updated

Page 26: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Fo::r.~ 005 Page li11 of [ill SU? P'..Er-,,1 ENTAllr~FOi1MATION SCHEDULE

,it!""

Transit ID w=;I1 ~ Level r-:-ir II

2J-.:J!

LJL.J Fic;c3! Year End I .... ', - '

! -

Note: Use a separate pc~E: Tor each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary. .

1. o Major service start-up

2. D Major service discontinuance

3. o Major new equipment or facilities

4. D Fare change

s. D Strike

6. D Other major service interruption

7. D "Other" o'rganization type (Forms 001/002)

C "Ot.l..:r" cCJrrtractual re;atiol\~hi~ (Form 002)

9. D Purchased tran5;:Jo:"t2t ion vehicles discrepancy (Forms 002/004)

11. 0 "Vehicle type discrepancy . (Forms 003/408)

12.0 Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

13.0 Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

14. D Fare revenue returned to reporter by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

15. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments (Forms 006/403)

16. D Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

17.0 "Other" reasons for days not operated (Forms 406/407)

18. D Fleet total discrepancy(Form 408) .,

19. D Other

10. D "Other" mode(s). vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

Description of above, plus any other relevant information.

2 Exclllsive Access Rjght-ai-way Segment The District operates bus ljnes on a Sprjng Street contra-flow lane in the downtown Los Angeles. The facility consists of one northbound lane. The sOllth end af this faciljty is the intersection of Sprjng and 9th Streets. while the north end of this facility is at Spring Street and Sunset Boulevard. The length of this facility is 1.5 miles.

Date Prep<::red D.:te Updated

Page 27: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FOr-f.' 005 Page li!J of [is] SUPPlEr.1ENTALIr~FORMATION SCHEDULE

Transit ID Level[il O! 2 ! 1 J

,'-

[8-.=1" F;u",1 Y':'::r End I . I ~ 1

'".,1 " [DI]E ~------'

Monrn Ody Ye<Jr

i~ote. Jse a separate pagt2 for each applicable item below. Check and describe only one item per page. Use as many pages as necessary.

1. D Major service start-up

2. [J Major service discontinuance

3. 0 Major new equipment or facilities

4. 0 Fare change

5. 0 Strike

6. . 0 Other major service interruption

7. 0 "Other" organization type (Forms 001/002)

3. D "ether'" con~ract.JQI rcJCJtionshit) (Form 002)

a n Purchased transpoi't3tion vehicles '---' discrepancy (Forms 002/004)

10. D "Other" mode(s), vehicle type(s), or ownership code(s) (Forms 003/004)

11 ~ D .Vehicle type discrepancy (Forms 003/408)

12. D Fixed/non-fixed guideway allocation methodology (Form 006)

13. D Fare revenue retained by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

14. D Fare revenue returned to reportei by purchased service contractor (300 series forms)

15. D Motorbus fixed guideway segments (Forms 006/403)

16. 0 Passenger mile data with sampling waiver (Forms 406/407)

17. D "Other" reasons for days not operated (Forms 406/407)

18. [l] Fleet total discrepancy (Form 408) .'

19.0 Other

Description ofabove, plus any other relevant information.

Fleet Total Discrepancy

1. There were 100 vehicles which were neither active nor contlngent,at the

_______Fy 89 year-end. These buses have been removed for long-term repairs (I ioe ?O aod Form 408) Therefore. columns H and I do not equal column B on Form 408.

Date Prc~,-:red Dc:~e Updated

Page 28: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Page 15 of 15

FORM 005

Definition of Fixed Guideway Segments

Directional Mileace

Peak Period Level of Service

Number Hours Si ngl e OccupantAutos Prohibited

Per Week Prohibition Enforced

a. Pri ority 1ane on multi-lane roadway.

E1 Monte Busway 21.60 'E' 168 168

b. Exclusive lane parall el to a multi-lane road­way bus separatedfrci:1 general traffic lane.

Spring Street Bus lane 1. 50 '0' 168 168

Page 29: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

----- ---

---1

.- "" ..,,;-/.:1

~~~ ::;Q.~ ~

-(.. o ~-

~~J

'~"

~.

S;. ~!

~, ...-- ­,. , ..-_., TI Jnsit ID GGlliJ

Fis,al Year End I:QII) [Q[i] ~ .. f

AI,oI" D.,.lonl'

No

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

UZA Numbel Mode Code FGtrJF-Typ~ of Servi

~"::..I

Fixd Guideway Directional Route Miles Act::JI Vehicle Revenue Miles P.lS'.cnger Miles Operating Expense (Reporting Agency) Retained Fare Revenue (Contract Service Provider(s))

Mode Code FG/tJF- F G"[illType of Service-· o 0 Fixed Guideway Directional Route Miles Actual Vehicle Rellenue Miles, Passenger Miles Operating Expense (Reporting Agency) Retained Fare Revenue (Contract Service Provider(s»

Mode Code FGItJ F· E§Type 01 Service" Fix~d Guid~way Directional Route Miles Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles Passenger Miles Operating Expense (Reporting Agency) Retained Fare Revenue (Contract Service Provider(s))

eFG =Fixed Guideway, NF =Non-Fixed Guideway "DO =Directly Operated Service, PT =Purchased TransportJI'on S~'rvice

Form a r,lge iTI cf t iJ SECTION 9 STATISllCS ~tJMMARY .

level I R J ... _-­d r J' U;-A r---;;-I~-\ _

( [70N.UZ'" UZA _ ~ _ANNUAL TOTAL __

.

I ] I oor oll'I ~_U39 ­ . ­

r ­

o~f ­

__0f­__D _f­

---0 ~--.O_I ­

" ­

e- Iii I -----.

I- i I -f I ----. "­ 100...955f 2ZG.56

1.13a..(J~1. _L.l96~92.0_----l..ll6.95D_fo­

'--­

~

---'---~-I---'-~-=-f- ­

.-;- -_._. -_.-f ­

--

L ......~_. I 23.~-o r='=_-__58~19 _C !_ _

hi >4V4 _I 5t~.91J£ _ ( l lo....BfiA.I0 __._

J I

-- ­

------1 I '--=-.~L--·~~

", ".

Date Prepared Date Updated _

Page 30: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

IlOCtM t01

B.e.Lt,f..iCE SHEET SUMMARY SCHEDUlE level W

021ECT CLASS

ASSETS

Cash and Cash It~ms

Rec~ivables

Materials and Supplies Inventory Other Current ksets Work. in Progr~s

Tangible Tran~t Op~~<:lting Pro~rty

Less Accumulated Depreciation

Tangible Property Other Than for Transit Operations -0­lei~ A((ulrIlJlatl d Ce p' eLiation

Intangible Asset\ less Accumulated Amortization

In\lf:stments Special Funds Other Assets

TOTAL ASSETS

lIABllJilES AND CAP1TAl

Trade Payables Accrued Payroll liabilities Accrued Tax liab!lities Short-Term Debt Other Current Liabilities Advances Payable Long-Term Debt Estimated liabilities Deferred Credits

TOTAL UABlllT1ES

Public (Governmental) Entity Ownership Private Corporation Ownership Private Noncorporate Ownership Grants, Donations, and Other Paid-in Capital Accumulated Earnings (Losses)

TOTAL CAPITAL

TOTAL UAD;UTI~5 A.WOCAPlTAL

,

DOlLAR DOLLAR AMOUNT AMOUNT

43 15' 864 124 601 .287 19,597.263

-0­tlL~,b4u,017

I 836,719,782 I I 364.057,236

i.On.750.472

I I 472,662,546

('

ILinJ

I'"0.\ Il I01

I 02 03

I':'J 05

I

::Q. I07

I08

I.. ~

'0

I11

,

101. 102. 103.

I i 04. , 105. ,,,. , 12.

q,

\

I ··0- I [ j

I -O­

-O- Il I-0- -0­

i -u­232.894,757

2,299.466

\1,524.848.20CL:]

,.. -------_.---­12,114,947 29,659,024

-0­72.295,906 .iR,489288 17,467,888 99,107,449

162,449,156 5,514,070

I 447,097,728 I 9.709.888

-0­-0­

1.067 QA":l ~C\ 56,919

I ".524.b48,200 I

I

14

1S

16 17 15 19 .." I- I21 22 23 24

2S

26

I~~ 29 30

31

I j~

.. 131.

~; I '41. , 5'.

201. 202. 203. 204. 205 21' ­221. 231. 241.

301. 30:l. 303. 304. 305.

Date Prepared Date Updated

I

Page 31: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

---

FORM 103

CAPITAL SUBSIDIARY SCHEDULE· SOURCES OF PUBLIC CAPITAL ASSISTANCE

- - ,- ;. IS i ~ I 0 I :fT] Le'.Jel I R

F:.::! '(e~r End [QJ2J I 0 I 11 @J1J MOttl" :J"y y~"

,::r­i I

..__.... _.._ .. " h

~l GOVERNMENT FUNDS AP~lIED TO TRANSIT SYSTEM

I IPART A. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

II

01 I .., Funds received from UMTI\ Act of 1964, as amended Section 3 Funds -, ..Section S. 9a, and/cr 9 ~unds

Other UMTA FundsI~~ I .- .. \ iotal UMTA Fu:""ds

I

I I fl. Funds received from other Department of Transportation Grant Programs (Identify)

Total Other DOT FvrdslJ !i I. OLler ?~derd; Fundill':ll:c ~,ltify)

I I iotal Other (:-:·::e"31 ;:"ridir.g

I 071 TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE I

SiAiE PART B. STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT

I. Funds allocated to transit out of the general

r

100 609 351 86 912 509

1 730 812 189.252 r 672 ,

I -O- J

E189,;~;,672 \

LOCAi.. GOVERNMENT

\~ ~ 11~ I

16

17

,

18

19

08 revenues of the g~vernmententity II I I II. Funds dedicated to transit at their source (Non-General Fund):

Dedicated Taxes ('1 I 1. In('o-'~ Taxes I ---_ ..­10 2. Sales Taxes SB 325 25,216,532 ·1 ,, 3. Property Taxes . ­ :I

:

~ . Payroll Taxes

I i5. Utility Taxes , ,

, 7. Gasoline Taxes Prop. 5 6. Commuter Taxes

I16,709 488 8. Other Taxes (Identify) ~ AIArt XIX IOthers 46,349,815 Benefit, Assessments 34,103,979 Total Other Taxes I 46,349,815 I , 34,103,979 :

Bridge. Tunnel, and Highway Tolls I I I q IIII. Other Public Sources (Identify) SB 90 &W?I 262,213

, 1City of LA/Ci~i of El Monte/LA Coon 8,739,881 \

Prop A Local Returns 402,856 9,404,950Total Other Public Sources I II !l

!

TOTAL STATEllOCAL ASSISTANCE I 63,059,303 I I 68,725,461 it,j

I IPART C. MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES MUcellaneol.!s Sources of Funding (Identify)

..are 5aVmos BanK ( 1,242 ).. so. cal Gas Co. 111

20 Total Miscellaneous Sources of Funding 1,131 )I II ( 1

Date Prepared Date Upd~ted

Page 32: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Fonn2a1

hEVENUE SUMMARY SCHEDULE

or (.:1sit ID Level m Fiscal Year End

, ('

TOTAL REVENUE r

~

l:~el REVENUE OBJECT CLASSES FOR PERIOD

401. Passenger Fares for Transit Service O~ 230,858,774 402. Special Transit Far(><j -0­403. School Bus Service Revenues -0­404. Freight Tariffs -0- --I~;I 405. Charter Service Revenues OS -0­

06 406. Auxiliary Transportation Revenues 3,651. 189 07 407. Nontransportation Revenues 6,774.922

408. Taxes Levied Diredly by Transit System08 -0­03 ':09. local Cash Grants g ••d Reimbursements 242 268.259 10 410. Local Special Fare Assistance -0­11 411. State Cash Grants ana Reimbutselnents 693 754 12 412. State Special Fare Assistance -0­

,.~

~ ~ 3~ Federal Cash Grants and Reimbursements OJ 48 869 812

!14 430. Contributed Servicp.s -0­15 Less Contra ACCOU:1L for Expenses -0- ) r ·0- ,II1<

j440. Subsidy from Other Sectors of Operations16 I -O­

17 TOTAL REVENUE I 533,116.710 I

f)PT'C'~AlINr:ORMAT1ON~

Passenger Fares for Transit Service by Mode

18 Mode Code: M B ?,n l=lC;l=l i7.!

19 ..."";'\,1

21 22 23 24 25

Date Prepared Date Updated

Page 33: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

FORM 203

REVENUE SUBSIDIARY SCHEDULE· SOURCES OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE

Transit 1D 1.9101 ?JO Level

Fiscal Year End [ol7l La III (ill r--'-,- Month ~y Y.., ...ab .LC _

GOV,Rr-;~"'ENT FUNDS APPLIED TO TRANSIT SYSTEM

Ip' ~T" FEDEctA.L GOVER~J~~:NT

II. 'FU~CS received from U~iA Act of 1964. as amended

II.

03

Section 5 andlor Section 9 Funds

Funds received from other Federal Programs (Identify) §:Tlcr.-J 8

Total Other Federal Funds

TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE

f=~ !PAR;':-~~ATE/lOCAL GOVER~M~~~-I -

Funds allocated to transit out of the generalII.

48,869,812 II -

ISTATE LOCAL GCVERNMENT GOVERNMENT i

I;I I I 1

: 126,724,991

-1 ._--­549,000 I

,

I I 11 111 ,791,089 II

III I I

..... ,

OS 06 07 08 C:" 10 11

. :'1e r.u es of ~r'e 9 Oli~rr::-" '":t entity

II. Funds dedicated to transit at their source (Non-General Fund): Dedicated Taxes 1. Income Taxes 2. Sales Taxes SB 325/TDA Funds 3. Property Taxes 4. Payroll Taxes S. l : lity Tax'~!.

6. Commuter Taxes 7 Gasoline Taxes SB 620

I 48,338.230

531, 562 I

: 8. Other Taxes (Identify) PROP A (lOCa.r.) 111,791,089I I

Total Other Taxes12

Bridge, Tunnel, and Highway Tolls13 .,

III. Other Public Sources (Identify) OIHER STATE GRANTS 144,754

j I

I\

HOLL'MXD 8O'lL(MINIBUS PRCG/CJIHERS-3, 752, 17c

14 Total Other Public Sources

1S TOTAL STATEILOCAlASSISTANCE

PART C. MISCELLA.NEOUS SOURCES

Miscellaneous Sourcl!'S of Funding (Identify)

16 Total Miscellaneous Sources of Funding

I 144,754 I I 3,752,179 I' I 693,754 I I 242,268,259 I

I -0- I I -O­ j

Date Prepared Date Updated

i

1

Page 34: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

---

n 301

EXPENSES CLASSIFI.:O B'f FUNCTION

Transit 10 EIQJ2[!] [TILevel

Fisc,)1 Year End [iliJ [iliJ liI2J Mode~

• II" Mon," n.... r ...,

..--­lln~

No.

- - ._­ --­ .. ---­ ---_.-,--_._--._--_.­ ------. ~_ ... _------_._-

I ..

Vehicle Vehicle Non-Vehicle General Expense Object Class Operations Main tenance Maintenance Administration

010 041 042 160 _.

501. LABOR 01 Operators' Salaries & Wages 132,449,132

~-o- -0­0­ ~02 Other Salaries & Wages 21,103,542 - 59.776,2')3 ~,T7J,36J 39 071, 9'1 ~

502. FRINGE BENEFITS 94,381,876 36;"740, "71 ~,933,824 24,015 'j,i,l 503. SERVICES 113,016 156,948 8,260 22.730," _.\. l

504. MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

_. -_.._--Total Expense

for Period

132 44q 111 t--­t-J2.1,725 122 t­ 15f'.I. 072 . 413 L- _.22cQlh2SLQ..

01 02 03 04

05 06 07 08 09 10

11 12 U 14 15

- -01 Fuel & Lubricants 16,447,125 700,353 -0­ -0­02 Tires & Tubes 5,369,865 30,920 -0­ -0­99 Other Materials & Supplies 1,826,538 22,087,198 3,721,934

..­1,625,223

505. UTILITIES -0­ - -0- 5.894,74H-0­506. CASUALTY 81 LIABILITY COSTS

. -0­ -0­ 936,473 32,470 87b

507. TAXES 1,353,978 11U,294 -0­ 142 981 508. PURCHASED TRANSPORTATION

01 Less than 50 Vehicles -u­ -u­ -0­ -0­02 SO or More Vehicles -0­ -0­ -0­ -0­

509. MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE - -u­ -u­ -0­ 7,846,444 510. EXPENSE TRANSFERS { Ltj, I tjtj ( :JJy,"b651 -0­ ( 17,371 , 170

TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES ~[l],Ulb,:lU4 llY,UbJ,UIL T2,373,854 116,435,744 ,

RECONCILING ITEMS:

r--------.--­17 147.478 5 400.785

29,260.893 5,894.748

33 407 349 1 607 253

-0­-0­

7 846.444 ( 17 939.623 520.888.954

16 511. INTEREST EXPENSES ............... , ....................................................................................................... ....................... 8 057'.942 17 512. LEASES & RENTALS ... .................................. .. ............................. . ......... .............. ............. ....... - ...................... 4 112,874 18 513. DEPRECIATlON .................................................................................... , ................... , ................. : .­ ... ,. . ............... 44,485,775 19 513.13 Amortization of Intangibles ....................................................... ................................... . .­ .. . . " ...., . . -0­20 514. PURCHASE LEASE PAYMENTS ..................................... ...... . .... ... . . ............. ....... ...... . . .. . , .. ........ . -0­21 515. RELATED PARTIES LEASE AGREEMENT ....................................................................................................................... -0­22 516. OTHER RECONCILING ITEMS ...................... ,. .......... .......... ..... ... ..... ......... ..... ............... .......... ......................... -0­23 TOTAL RECONCILING ITEMS ................................................. ...... ....... ......... ................ . . , . . . . .. . ...........

,c

56,656,591

24 TOTAL EXPENSES FROM PUBLISHED REPORTS ............................ ........ ....................... ......... ............ ....................... 1 577,545,545J 25 MEMO ITEM: Expenses not allowable for Federal Cp~rating Assistance ..................................................................................

..__ .

!

Date Prepared Date Updated

Page 35: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

----

'."r RE(){.'IR~C 'Off MODes WITH 1S OR

_E'wtllREVENUE VEHICLfS OPERA TEO IN FORM 321ANNUAL. MAXIMUM SERVICE

G7-::r:ATORS WAGES SUBSIDIARY S\:HEDULE

Transit 10 LevelWJU 211 I GJ rlsc2i rear End 101 7-1 i'-cTll [ill] Mode ~

~ Mor.~n Year

b r

Line I.- I·v. TI~\l1E CLASS;FICATION DOLLARS HOURS ~

OPERATING TIME

Report time (Pull out) 1 811 161 I 132.279 1Turn-in time (Pull in) . R71 1:;::'

'~ ~~~Travel time 299C;.d17

I IPlatform time--line service 1nf, .,nq i L.n 7 ~!:: i 7 Platform time--charter & special service -0- -0-Intervf'ni"g time 1,,09,t;1l 7,749 Paid breaks & meal allowance -0- 1 -0-Minimum guarantee for call out -0- I, -0-~\I~;nlmum guajant~e--oC:l"Y 2, 601, 938 186 357 Minimum guarantee--weekly -0- -0-0'Jerti:ne premium-·s(h:'(~'J!~d 6 839 263 I 959 743 Overtime premium--unscheduted 2,427,986 335 081 Spread time premium -0- -0-Shift premium J'I. .n Other operating premium 3 441 790 162 991 ..J

TOTAL OPERATING TIME I 127,308,083 I

NONOPERATING PAID WORK TIME

instructor premium for operator training 63,227 50,585 Student training time 1,257,401 131,454 A<eident reporting time :>9,118 4,797 Witness time 48,859 3,795 Stand-by time 3,422,816 259,527 Time spent on union functions -0- -0-Run selection time 11,503 870 Other time spent in transportation administration 117,208 8,755 Time spent in revenue vehicle movement control 158,620 12,951 Time spent in ticketing and fare collection -0- -0-Time spent in customer service -0- -0-Time spent in other nonoperating functions 2,297 "'0-

TOTAL NONOPERATING PAID WORK TIME I 5,141,049 I

TOTAL OPERATING AND NONOPERATING TIME I 132,449,132 I

III 01

02

I0304

I05OG

I0708

I ~.;

10 1 •

I

12 13

!

11. !

01I~ :02

ii.03 1.04 1.05 106 i.07 1.08

I~ :~~ 1" 1.12 1.13

14 1.14 15 1.15

16

I 2.

I : 7 2J1

I ~8 12 02 , .;j ; 2.03

20 '2.04 2' 2.05 22 2.06 23 2.07 24 2 08 25 12.09. 26 2.10 27 12.11 26 ~. 1.2

29

I 30 I- . --

Date Prepared 10/25/89 Date Updated

Page 36: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

M"'" '/tEO/ltOM rltANSlrSYSTCM~;

ttH.·iJ .IfAJE1S0RFEWERREVENUf \

VEHJ;US IN ANNU"l. MAXIMUM SERVICE Form 3:..

FRINGE BENEFITS SUBSIDIAl\Y SCiEDliLE

Transit 10 ~

Fiscal Year End [£[!] rn ~ le\. ,I "'-'JL~~ -", ~ r..,

• II

line No. FRINGE BENEFIT OBJECT CLASSES EMPLOYER TOTAL EMPLOYEE TOTAL

. ._---O. 502.0' FICA or Railroad Retirement 21, 029,711 2 ~ .829,711-_.. - ­02 502.02 Pension Plans (including long-term disabii: ~y insurance) 11,602,802 i,465,OP.I..__._--­0) 502.03 Hospital, Medical, and Surgical Plans 37,750,528 746,557

04 502.()44 Dental Plans 442,340 -D-

OS 502.05 Ute Insurance Plans 5,051,044 594,944

06 502.06 Short·Term Disability Insurance 544,052 -0­

01 502.07 Unemployment Insurance 524,729 -D-

Ol 502.08 Workmen's Compensation Insurance or Fea. Empl. Liab. Act Contribution 35,458,886 -0­

09 502.09 Sick Leave 9,151,032 -0­

10 502.'0 Holiday (including all premiums paid for VIf\lrk on holidays) 6,276,700 -O-

Il 502.11 Vacation 22,712,567 -0­

12 502.12 Other Paid Absence (bereavement pay, military pay, jury duty pay, etc.) 4,738,438 -O-

Il 502.11 Uniform and Work Clothing Allowances 1,543,121 -0­

.4 502.14 Other Fringe Benefits 446,455 -0­

15 TOTAL 158,072,413 27,637,031

.

Oite Prepared Date Updater'

"

Page 37: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

tvOT REO<;IREO FROM TRANSIT SYSTEMS

[

' WH<k OPERA TE 2S OR FEWER REVENUE

VfHICLES IN ANNUAL MAXIMUM SERV1CE _______ --=--.J

FORM 332

PH!SION PLAN QUESTIONNAJRE

Transft ~D

Fi<r=!1 Ypar End rn Ir : ~ Im level G

L.

IL.n~ I '.~. i

Month D~l'

ITElv1

Ye~r --\"-

DOLLAR AMOUNT

--.

,. Fully Funded Plan

a. Current service cost b. ?rior service cost c. Interest on prior service cost

Fully Funded Plan -- Total Cost

2. Pay-As-You-Go Plan--Total Cost

TOTAL PENSION PLAN COST (line 04 plus line 05)06

I , 3. ""'-2''':;on Liability 2ase.i on 12/31/88 valuation

loi a. Plan assets 08 b. Less vested benefits

09 URfuneed liability Surplus

4. If you committed to a fully funded plan, please indicate the following:

( 1 840 598 \ N/A

11,346,412

1_­

! 11, 346 , 4 12

369,410,429 346,952,218

22,458,211

N/A

10 11

! I 1

12 13

a. Unfunded prior service cost b. Years required to fully fund this cost

S. If you have a pay-as-you-go-plan, please indicate the following:

a Unfunded prior service cost b. Years required to fully fund this cost

I

I N/A

I

I 6. If you now have a pay-as-you-go plan and you have had a recent

actuarial study or other similar estimate made to determine your cost under a fully funded pension plan, please indicate what your pension plan expense would have been during the period under the fully funded plan:

N/A

14 15 J6 I

I

1 17

a. b. c.

Current Service Cost Prior Service Cost Interest on prior Service Cost

ESTIMATED TOTAL COST

:Q/25/89Date Prepared Date Updated

I

Page 38: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

I

Form 401

T;:-/ ;,::!T SYSTEM SERVICE PERIOD SCHEDULE

Transit 1D I I 0

Fiscal Year End I ~ • .....__

! '!jI '1' ',' 1 ;

I -, I I ~. i .1 r-;;r;l _ - __ - __• 0·. ".\

Mont'" Day Year

L;ne

No.

,

I i 01

I "2

I ~3 ';~

I 05

06 1

I

07

('13

09

10

11

12

ITEM

I LIMITS OFSERVICE PERIOD:

I Time Morning service begins

Time AM PEAK service begins

Time Midday servicE? beg!ns

Tirr'e P\1 PEAKse~\i:e b:~ins

Time Night service begins

Time Night service ends I

!

TOTAL HOURS

Morning period

AM "eak y?ricd

Midday period

PM Peak period

Night period

ENTIRE DAY -- TOTAL HOURS I 24 0 I

Date Prepared Date Updated

Level W Mode I ','D

~.-----.-.J

rln

I I

I

I

I

I

I I I I I

SATURDAY

I 0000 I

I 2400 I

I 24 0 I

SUNDAY

.o­i DODO J

I 2400 I

I 24 0 I

WEEKDAY

0000

0600

0930

) 4,10

1830

240C

6.0

3,5

4,5

4 5

5 5

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I I I I

Page 39: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Form 402

REVENUE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE

;,i .. O EL c~GY CONSUMPTION SCHEDULE

T_." ·~~:t II) I ~i ,I - ! Level9' I R :I --:...i-_'

Fiscal Year End CQIZJ II

01,

1 i [ill] Mode " I ~ ,,,_.... ,.

''I-~O" .. h ./ YeiJr

h"

I LI~e ITEM ~ AMOUNTSI .v.

! I

I I NUMBER OF ROADCALLS

, U1*, For mechanical failure

1____:_~:~:! _.1I 02*1 For other reasons

I 03*1 TOTAL ROADCALLS

I nA I, TOTAL LABOR HOUPS c!JR INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE I 2,195,934 I

I I

105 1"'4~t\/18ER OF UGH1 1'."u:.. ::·j;·i::NANCE FACILITIES

Serving under 200 vehicles ~ 06 Serving 200-300 vehicles ;. 07 Serving more than 300 vehicles n

08 TOTAL LIGHT MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 14

ENERGY CONSUMPTION

·"'~l ' Kilowatt hours of propulsion powerI 10 I Gallons of diesel fuel 27 979 623

I j I x Gallons of gasoline 0 12* Gallons of LPG or LNG a 13* Gallons of bunker fuel 0

.~

*Not applicable to rail modes

Date Prepared Date Updated

Page 40: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

- -

----------

Form 403 Page D of D TRANSIT WAY MILEAGE SCHEDULE

_~ n 2: 1

1-'011 [QIiJ [iiJ --_._-_ __ . -- ­

-"

'')2 :)3

, 04

,06 \7

09 "u

11

.2 : 13

1.1

i 15 ! 1E

i 18

I~; 22

i 23 ! 24 125

, ;:leA~IO~~S ~) :'~c -:C\AL r,,i'::~=S CF

.. ... _: )

I

\ IVO:;~ CC,:DE: RR !

At crade, exclusive row if--------At graje, with eross traffic At gracie, mixed & c ross traffic

rE E:evatec on fill O~.:. .... ('Jt

S~L.J"..oy TOTAL

MODt lOOt: SC At grade, exclusive row ~,._ 9rcc~e, VViUI cru::;Stratfic At grade, mixed & c rcss tra ffi c

" F:",~··I.::,-rc.r1 r·r'j str'.1ctu re

~ ,I I I

~-I I

Level I R I

Type of Service * LQQ]

"

I I!

r'L.r<.'BE" OF r'~Lr-/BEPOFI I C~()" ',GS S- :.. ~ :.J \ S

I i

I I

I II

-:.. '/~ :::4GE

r.....10l\ ~r'L y

:,I::'=C .... r~~,j..:. _

ROl;-:: MI:..ES"

: I

I I I I

!I I I I I I

elevated on fill OOfl~ cut 111-----]11--11

' .•..41 I

I TOTAL 1[--' II' I I I ~ ,~

111 III !IMCDE CODE: CR I I' At grooe, exclusive row At grade, with cross traffic At graae, mixed & cross traffic I : Elevated on structure

I Ei","i3teu on fill I Open rut

E-----J "- I~I~ !

r--·----I '}6 I Subway 127 TOTAL I I I I I I i28 . MODE CODE: IP

~ I i~9 i, xc: U~~: ve ROil\! i I !!

r I I IIe 'II:w : ···~ODE CODE: CC , .n I EXClUSive ROWi i 32 IMODE CODE: AG 33

1

i

~

i:

i

l14

35 36 37

I -'~8

ExclUSive ROW

t-JON-RAIL MODES

MODE CODE: MB TB FB TR OR

I J I I' I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I II I

DIRECTIONALDiRECT'OIlJAL DIRECTIONAL ROl,;TE ~ILES ROUTE MILES ROUTE VlILES

ON ON CONT~OLLED ON M:XED EXCLUSIVE ROW TRAFFIC ROWACCESS ROW

?1 h 11~711 ?1 " §

!

I

') =Directly Operated Service PT =Purchased Transportation Service

.omolete column g only If there was a change (Increase/decrease) In service dUring reporting period that affected the

Date Prepared Date Updated

Page 41: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Form 404

TRANSIT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE

Transit 10

Fiscal Year End

[;, 0 I ;)2]

rn lQUI GGI Month ledf

Level

Mode

W ~

b c

EMPLOYEE EQUIVALENTS LABOR CLASS; .iC.~ TIO[\j

OPERATING LABOR CAPITAL LABOR

I I • I01 I Transportation Administration I 367,4 I I02 i Revenue Vehicle Operatio, I 4439,2 I I 03 I Transportation Support I 134.~

I ' I 04, Vehicle Maintenance Administration I 186 7 I I 05 I Revenue Vehicle Inspection & Maintenance I 1032 6 I I

06 Vehicle Maintenance Support I 422 5 I

07 Non-Vehicle Maintenance Administration I 14 7 I r.~ Non-VehidplV'aintenance SUPr"ort L..._.-2.'1..1 ...L_J

I I

1M I Marketing and Planning 1__....16.....2........6<---_1

General Administration Support<~ I I 693 3 I

I 11 TOTAL TRANSIT SYSTEM EMPLOYEE EQUIVALENTS 1__7.....7......6 ......8__0..... 1 1__11.Q8~O..;.7----'1

Date Prepared Date Updated

Page 42: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

- -

,'-'''1- ... -"-~.~i..

:-:;~;---":.=.':: ~ - .",_ ;.i~"~.:;~~~'-~-:?:"

- ",- ,-'.' .'.. ; ..

FORM 405

TRANSIT SYSTEM ACCIDENTS SCHEDULE

Transit \0 EillJIIT] Fiscal Year End [ili] (QJjJ [ill]

Line No.

01 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08

09 10

! I

2

13 1£

, .0

;7 '8

19 20

.-ITEM

NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ClASSIFIED AS:

Fatality, Penonallnjury 1& Property Camag_ Fatality & Penonal Injury Fatailty & Property Camage Fatality Only . Penonallnjury 1& Property Camag_ Penonallnjur/ Only Property Damage Only

TOTAL ACCIDENTS

NUMBER OF FATALITIES CLASSIFIED AS:

Revenue Vehicle OccupantS On-Duty Employ", Others

Other Vehicle OccupantS On-Duty Employ", Others

Pfllestnans On-Duty Employees Others

NUMBER OF PERSONS INJURED ClASSIFED AS:

Rewnue Vehicle OccupantS On-Duty Employ", Others

Other Vehicl_ OccupantS On-Duty Employees Others

Pedenrians On-Outy Employ", Others

COlUSION

2 I

Level

Mode

NON-COLUSION

-n ­-u­

1 5

789 698

i..75b Ll ?"32

-0­-u-Lll

648 ?"3Ll 925

'.

, I

1 0

I I

I I

U 3

t I

, I

0 5

I I

I I

146 9R6

I I

I I 1

.? 76'

I I

I I

0 64

I I

n 0

N/A N/A

-0­-u­

797 522

N/A N/A

N/A N/A

STATION

-0­-n­

, _0­-u­-0­6A -0­68

I N/A N/A

I I

N/AN/A

I -0-I -U­

, -N /0.

I N/A

I N/A I N/A

I -0-I ~R

10/31/89Date Prepared 09/06/89 Date Updated 400-20

Page 43: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

, .orr:,406

TRAI>JSIT SYSTEM SEHVICl SUi>;'L1ED, jfRVICE CONSUMED,SEJ VICE PERSONNEl, & ~fRVICE OPERATED SC: IEDULE

Transit II) ~ NON-Il/\;lM~DES Le\.el [ U Fiscal Year End r::-rJ r:T:I i~~ MOlle [.NIO

LUl-LJ ULW LJU~U f r . . [--;:;n-)Monrh O.y

" . {,dv

E~ "-

line AVERACEAVERAGE WEEKDAY AVE RAG ~VERAGE SUNDAY ANNUAL

AM PEAK MIDDAY PM PEAK No. WEEKDAY SATURDAYITEM

TOTAL

.,._.­I.ROl

OTHER TOTAL ~TOTAL TOTALJ I 1111)1 ?53 LR?6 ' 1------ ­1 .R?1i 1 07n "~'"'

R 1 ~QlI Fill IlIlFi 7F. ?17Ql:\..A6-9­ 11L-62? ?fl.l4265._161.., '; ?..l.O1 ~~5.336 7 ,553 .. t--4 7275.723 23.339 15,655 _L2.J ·39 ._n(~163,j

61 OS;;> /? " ,'.) i",S1 (illlR,: .LillL 6..w.L9...f-.UL4...28ZI_151,l.l " .., ..)., .lA.i~~~'~g~' 8j ..5Q.i_61. 399 268.8 L9 185.368 -.1.52., JD ..._Uf. ...L6..L 5 212

L5.-' ,954 5.200 7,063 J.83! 21. 306 14.757 11." 64 .. ___ ['.286 L.J

.~).>U.~)l JllHL)

I" '>chool bus miles

I I,,'VI(lCONSUM'O

I 369.961 I 300.430 I 494.594 I=:IM,Q.ll:: 1 1 11.9"'0 846 2.5.Q... S9fi :-lSQ 41' ,820 fl'?46 1(;H 11'1111 .019 ? 1I1i4 7.3l 1 6LHl 7flfl h00

~

1.3031.819 2.7391 394 1. 9221 844 1.'!91' 212 0 362 287 263

44 0 200

~o64 65 94 68 58

38 36 4 721! 36 2 ;;>04R 40 n7 4n3b ...4fi

lQ 10 (;4

? 1 ~7

?? 11 lQ fifl 2.21g 1 507 3 377 ? 390 1 924 1.492

r.:? 5R 364/54 ,

-

,

r. ,', 365/3661)11?l1tl

01 02 0) 04 OS 06 07 08 09

'0

, 1

I]

14 15 16 17

18

19

20

21 22

23

24 lS If

. 2

SERVICE SL'PPLIED

Number of vehicles in operation

Total actual vehide mIles

Total actual vehicle hours

Total actual vehicle revenue miles

Total scheduled vehicle revenue miles

Total actual vehIcle revenue houn

Actual revenue capacity miles

Charter service hours

Charter service miles

~chool bus hours

Unlinked passenger triPS

Passenger miles

SERVICE PERSONNEL

Scheduled full-time vehicle operators

Scheduled part-tIme vehicle operators

Rev'!nue vehIcle movement control personne

Tlcketltoken sales agents. fare collectors.

gate keepers

Route/schedule Information operators

Security agents

Total service personnel

SERVICE OPERATED (Days)

Days schedules operated

Days not operated due to no scheduled servIces

Days not operated due to start·ups and/or terminations

Days not operate'd due to strikes

Days not operated due to offtClally declared emergencies

Oays 'lot operated dulL' to other reasons (describe on Form 005) Total days

Yo.. Type 0 .) :rVI(J.:''' .,ili.L-J

j 56 23

7 12 ? 96 03 00

000

• DO =Directly Operated ServIce PT =Pure! ,.i~ '?d Transportation Service

DatE.' Prepared Date Updated

Page 44: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

II,' II ,II, I'I-.\'II\IUI: '.'1 Hll I.l 11, 'i, t,ll! :Y hl,;11 (.'111 r

II, 011:.',['1 L.11.: 9'.'1 ! ,I III ';1 .. 1·.' ,':' IAJ

.crt!. 'dill, EN": ! /.11 I [ll~ I "I I:

\I

" () f' u II .1 "1 II

I I'll 11u.

VUI1LLE~.>

ltJ Illltll. ILLEf

VIIITI:IF I)'IT CfJDF

1.11'JIlFr,­t;f I J F' I)IOE

'iL 111~

HI

"II ".

I'll 10. I lll)l'

I'II!'}IL t.III1·I\IEI"'

i\r:T I VI VI IIJ eLf' fl'J I-LEII

EI1t I, I ,1·1'1l:-{ ((11·11 11.11 ,II,II;Y

lUI I

FlIEI l'd'L

1,1, ,Ill'

SU,I­IHF;

''{II ; ,I ;.

11 ...

~ • I , ,t II I Ilil,

I il"t",'

I I,

If J ,,,I I

'fl "I I" ,,( II' II I

l)III,llll,

i 1/ till,

' 1 1 !'

II 1-:.,

'I

",'I: 1,(,f·L : I r 1 1111.

1',lll-/\I,1

1'1 I· ,,' r J '.'1'

I I I 1.\ I ~.

',II! I,'

"

" -' b 7 8 '?

10 1 1 I"... 13 11 1:3 16 1'/

18 19

1,1. I

'/0

~:") )'

1~_jU

III /6

412 17 :;·0 41 M~ ,,;;:

..,:....J

·37 41

221 77

934 ~o

9 18

HI)

1'0.\

nl~

U{)

ItO B(\ BA BEt BEl B(~

H(\

BA B?\ BA DA BA {~B

?\B DB

UU IJII 1111

(l1J 110 OD uo DO no DtJ [lU no no 00 00 un UU UU UD

-'1 I,IIL: I j' 1:1 (] ;.(; jilt';

: ,. I I I ;<.

"I i !" I,: 7:,) UIIC

u~.:: Nt U [j,:; II Z Ull liZ n rLX

H',:' 1,1'le

ri I LX /~; FI. X HO II. x 17 ()1"1(.:i

Lll l,llL: ILl "li,N lEI "11.1\1 /4 Nt ()

, IH I' I~.() -/ t •

',1'1·1·\11 : 11 l, )'/{Ii.

.11,' I ')~'(A'

~,u 1 ():j~:'.•) ...., ,'BII::.::'O'!f.l

AI'J.l40A cm'L';OO , '[IIoJ:500 11 J \)UDOI, I ["10(,0-1

:;'.1 ')2[11 ~511)2U 1 ::\~: 1028\1 1 1(1:.:40Ett.l I Bu2(14 SU~::2(1 J B ~.(,

~3L'i.' 20 1(L'" 1\11 ~·'~'.3

=:f., 1~ ,\ :

( " '1 "

'I 1 ~:

H

:51) .3 J -. , ''':''-'

H "", ' "'::.' .. '

221 61

9::.'.'1 ~·:u

'l '!

, i , , ., ., ..J

.~'-'

(I

~

0 , I

,I

:~. I

18 u

16 II

~

'.0

u

III III

III III OF OF OF DF OF DF OF DF DF DF OF OF 1»= DF nr

,I

4 ... III

'1 c· '1'1 47 'I.:. .... \1:: L ...1

27 11:5 '':".6 51 51 '16 47 4:-6~J

6~:;

1I~'

'.\

'.1,

'.,,(

' . ?J J .}

I'. -,.... ,

lli :: ~:' ,.t; 0:,;. .....1

:"-~. ,.,'~"'::".:'

~' 1 -. ~ , ., -' .~

:0',:- .. '1 I

" ,1;1

I".l.. "

i ill'.',

,.'b(')~:;

. ,,',"1~:

('I=~U

()~Jt,

1.'9U

l'lu~,

1'./'1 11 J H '1 "1::'.'7 ,'98':J

',' ;~';6('

:.9~,

IBU fL',

\

'.'

I I 'i:'~J

::.tJ .' bl~i

! 61 '" ,111 ::f,'t.)

/ \ ~:(j

11;., /t'.r

:'~' 'I 1 ;C'. ' I

,;'.'/ / :,~. '.I ( )

;:"1

...:. I'

ruf.al : 2~\6(J ... ,-:r,-,. ';:".:'.':._,,1 14q

tJUIE: ZZZ in Lin£'~, 8 and Date Prepared: 9/15/R~

UpE'rc:~t i uns 3099

'i of Colun". r jfldica~{'~s Carl'Plltet' EtC'Ii,' Wurl,,;.

'r2'''-1

:i,~ ~.-,.~~

'~,d -.:i,

Page 45: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

~; ..,.,. r

~

r:[

I

I I j

I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

I

UMTA SECTION 9 REPORT

i'or The Yed.r Znc:.ed July 1, 1:.,.;E.9

rr...... "'"',.... -~~ \.J G :~. ~_; -=:; ..~:;

&LybranJ . ~ .t- ; ~:::'-.

Page 46: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

UMTA SECTION 9 REPORT

Fo~ The YEa~ End~d July 1, lSJ~

Page 47: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

The Board of Directors Southern California Rapid Transit District

We understand that the Southern California Rapid Transit District (the "District") is eligible to receive grahts under Section 9 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended, and in connection therewith the District is required to report certain information to the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) .

UMTA has established the following standards with regard to the data reported to it in the Section 9 Statistics Summary, Form 006, of the District's annual Section 15 Report:

A system is in place and maintained for recording data in accordance with Section 15 definitions. The correct data are being measured and no systematic errors exist.

A system is in place to record data on a continuing basis and the data gathering is an ongoing effort.

Source documents are available to support the reported data and are maintained for UMTA review and audit for a minimum of 3 years following UMTA's receipt of the Section IS report. The data are fully documented and securely stored.

A system of internal controls is in place to assure the accuracy of the data collection process and recording system and reported documents are not altered. Documents are reviewed and signed by a supervisor, as required.

The data collection methods are those suggested by UMTA or have been approved by UMTA and/or a statistical expert as being equivalent in assuring quality and precision. The collection methods documented are being followed.

The deadhead miles, computed as the difference betwe~n

the reported total actual vehicle miles data and the reported total actual vehicle revenue miles data, appear to be accurate.

Data are consistent with prior reporting periods and other facts known about District operations.

Page 48: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

We have applied the procedures documented below to the data contained in the accompanying Section 9 Statistics Summary, Form 006, for the fiscal year ended July 1, 1989. Such procedures, which were agreed to and specified by UMTA on pages 10 through 17 of the April 1989 Urban Mass Transportation Industry Uniform System of Accounts and Records and Reporting System (Reporting Manual) and were agreed to by the District, were applied to assist you in evaluating whether the District complied with the standards described in the second paragraph of this report and that the information included in the Section 15 Report Form 006 (Section 9 Statistics Summary) for the fiscal year ending July 1, 1989 is presented in conformity with the requirements of the Reporting Manual as specified in 49 CPR Part 630, Federal Register, September 25, 1987. This report is intended solely for your information and UMTA and should not be used by those who did not participate in determining the procedures.

The procedures described below, which are referenced in order to correspond to the Reporting Manual procedures, were applied separately to each of the information systems used to develop the reported vehicle reverue miles, fixed guideway directional route ffilied, passeng~r mil~s, and operdLing ~xpenses of the DisLrict for the fiscal year ending July 1, 1989 for the motorbus directly operated mode.

a. We obtained from Mr. Ashok Kumar, Supervising Planner, and read a copy of the District's written procedures related to the system for reporting and maintaining data in accordance with the Section 15 requirements and definitions set forth in Title 49 CFR Part 630 (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "al').

b.We discussed ,the procedures referenced in paragraph 3., above, with Mr. Kumar. We inquired of Mr. Kumar whether the District followed such procedures on a continuous basis and whether he believed such procedures result in accumulatlon and reporting of data consistent with the Section 15 definitions and requirements set forth in Title 49 CPR Part 630. We were informed by Mr. Kumar that, to the best of his knowledge, the District has followed such procedures on a continuous basis and that they result in the accumulation and reporting of data consistent with the Section 15 definitions and requirements set forth in Title 49 CFR Part 630 (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "b").

c. We inquired of Mr. Kumar concerning the retention policy that is followed by the District with respect to source dOCuments supporting the Section 15 data reported on Form 006. Mr. Kumar informed us that source documents would be retained ~cr at least three years following UMTA's acknowledged recei?ts of the Section 15 report.

2

Page 49: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

We located and observed the source documents supporting the Section 15 data reported on Form 006 for the years ended July 2, 1988, June 27, 1987, and June 28, 1986 and found them properly retained (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "e").

d. Based on the description of the District's procedures obtained as described in procedures 3. and 4., above, we identified the following source documents for retention by the District for a minimum of three years:

Statistical data files maintained on the District's on-line IBM system. With respect to passenger miles, the source documents are files containing data from Ride Checks and Fare Surveys. For vehicle revenue miles, the source document is the file containing Basic Operating Schedules.

We selected the months of November 1988, February 1989 and June 1989 and observed that each type of source document exists for each of th~se periods ~l'.(;porLn9 ;'\:anual jE:=ticm 3 Test. "d ll ;.

e. We discussed the District's system of internal controls with Mr. Kumar. We inquired whether individuals, independent of the individuals preparing the source documents and posting the data summaries, reviewed the source documents and data summaries for completeness, accuracy, and reasonableness and how often such reviews are performed. We were informed by Mr. Kumar that all source documents and data summaries are reviewed for completeness and reasonableness by personnel either in the Planning Department or Scheduling Department (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "e").

f. We: rev iewed sou .... c~ docuu.enL& a.ld data SUf,1mar ies o.nJ .1o·~ed

that such reviews as indicated in step e are not documented as being completed. However, in connection with reviewing such procedures in place, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that procedures were not being performed (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test IIfll).

g. We obtained the worksheets utilized by the District to prepare the final data which are transcribed onto Forn 006, Section 9 Statistics Summary. We compared the periodic data included on the worksheets to the periodic summaries ?repared by the District and proved the arithmetic accuracy of the summar izations. We noted no deviations (Reporting [·lanual Section 9 Test "g ").

h. We discussed the District's procedures for accumulating and recording passenger mile data in accordance with Section 15 requirements with Mr. Kumar. We were infor~ed t~at ?~S~2ng~~

mile data was accumulated as follows: "The Distric'C u:.i':"i::2S sampling and estimation procedures that are an alterna~1~2 to

3

Page 50: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

the three sampling procedures suggested by UMTA. Documentation of the alternative sampling procedures was submitted to UMTA for review in a District letter dated July 7, 1987 and UMTA review is currently in progress. In addition, the sampling methodology and estimation procedures wer~ reviewed by Multisystems, Inc., together with Northeastern University, and found to yield unbiased estimates whose accuracy exceeds UMTA's accuracy standard of + 10% precision at a 95% confidence level; in fact, the sample size is so large that, combined with the revenue-based estimation used, the precision at the 95% confidence level is below 2% (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "h").

i. We discussed with Mr. Kumar the eligibility of the District to conduct statistical sampling for passenger mile data every third year under the guidelines promulgated by UMTA in Title 49 CFR Part 630 and he informed us that the District is not eligible to conduct statistical sampling for passenger mile data every third year because it meets none of the criteria necessary for it to qualify for such treatment (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "i").

j. We obtained a copy of the sampling procedures for the estimation of passenger mile data used by the District and a copy of the District's methodology mile data from Mr. Kumar. We reviewed the procedures used to select the actual sample of runs for recording passenger used to prepare the sample of runs from the total population of runs. We reviewed the methodology used to randomly select specific runs from the universe. We reviewed the procedure used to replace a missed sample run with a randomly selected replacement sample run. We noted no exceptions to the stated sampling procedure (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "j").

k. We &elected d rand~m sampla of the sour~2 ~ocume~ts ~3ej for accumulating passenger mile data and reviewed the selected documents to determine if all required data were recorded and if computations were accurately performed. Our sample consisted of four percent of the fare surveys conducted and fourteen percent of the ride checks conducted.

The District accumulates passenger mile data on an annual basis, rather than by periods. We tested the accumulation of such data on an annual basis. We noted no exceptions in performing the above (Reporting Hanual Section 9 Test "k").

1. We discussed the procedures for systematic exclusions of charter and school bus vehicle miles from the calculation o~

vehicle revenue miles with Hr. Kumar.

4

Page 51: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

We were informed by Mr. Kumar that the District does not operate charter bus and/or school bus service. In connection with performing the procedures referred to in this report, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the District operated charter bus and/or school bus service during the year ended July 1, 1989 (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "1").

m. We obtained a copy of the District's procedures for accumulating and reporting vehicle revenue mile data and discussed them with Mr. Kumar. We were informed by Mr. Kumar that the District calculates vehicle revenue miles by aggregating the revenue service distances traveled by the District's bus lines as documented in each lines l Basic Operating Schedule. The aggregate amount is reduced by non-revenue service miles such as missed trips and maintenance runs. We selected a random sample of five percent of the days that service was operated during the year and recomputed the arithmetical accuracy of the summarization of vehicle revenue miles (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "m"): no excepti~ns were noted.

n. We discussed the procedures for the recording and accumula­tion of vehicle revenue mile data for rail modes with Mr. Kumar.

We were informed by Mr. Kumar that the District did not operate rail modes during the year ended July 1,' 1989. In connection with performing the procedures referred to in this report, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the District operated rail modes during the year ended July 1, ~989 (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "n").

o. We discussed the District's procedures for accumulating and reportj.ng fixed guideway directional .:oute .niles \!i.:h f.L:. Kumar. He informed us that the District's motor bus service meets the UMTA's definition of fixed guideway service contained in UMTA Circular C 9030.1A, "Section 9 Formula Grant Application Instructions," Appendix C, pages 11-13 in that the service is motor bus service operating over exclusive and controlled access rights of way and access is restricted, there is a legitimate need for restricted access, as demonstrated by peak periods level of service traffic condition F on parallel adjacent highway, and restricted access is enforced (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "0").

p. We discussed the measurement of fixed guideway directional route miles with Mr. Kumar. We were informed that fixed guideway directional route mileage is co:nputed in aCCCrG2nCS with UMTAls definitions of fixed guideway and directlonal route miles contained in UMTA Circular C 9030.1A, Section 9 Formula Grant Application Instructio~s, Appendix C, pages 11-13.

5

Page 52: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

We inquired whether there were service changes during the year that resulted in an increase or decrease in vehicle revenue miles operated on a fixed guideway. We were informed that the loss of two lines in December 1988 caused a decline in total vehicle revenue miles operated on a fixed guideway.However, fixed guideway directional route miles were not affected. In connection with performing the procedures referred to in this report, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the District incurred any other changes in service during the year that resulted in an increase or decrease in directional route miles (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "p").

q. We measured fixed guideway directional route miles by tracing maps of fixed guideway service. We agreed the fixed guideway directional route miles we obtained above to that reported on the District's Section 15 Form 006, Section 9 Statistics Summary (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "q").

r. We inquired of Mr. Kumar whether other public transit agencies operate service over the same fixed guideway as the DiRt r '.c-t. We v"'He i~for.n.~d t ~at Pmt t"( n-~~r k IV, '.lr.0e: Cl contract from the County of Los Angeles, operated service over the same fixed guideway under the name Foothill Transit. In connection with performing the procedures referred to in this report, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that any other public transit agency operated service over the same fixed guideway as the District (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "r").

s. We agreed Operating Expenses as reported on Section 15 Form 006, "Section 9 Statistic Summary," to operating expenses reported on the District's financial statements, on which we rendered our report dated October 13, 1989, after reconcili~g

fc r ad j us tinq i terns in accoJ: ja~:ce wi th :11= proced~res discussed in the Reporting Manual, Section V., "Expense Reporting Forms" (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "s").

t. We inquired of Mr. Kumar whether the District contracts for transportation service. We were informed that the District does not contract for transportation service. In connection with performing the procedures referred to in this report, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the District contracts for transportation service (rteporting Manual Section 9 Test "t").

u. As noted in step "tn, the District does not contract for transportation service, and therefore certification of j~L~

for contracted services is not included wi th this rep':;:.:;:. (Report Manual Section 9 Test "u").

v. As noted in step "tn, the District does not contract fo: transportation service, and therefore no con~racts f)[

service were reviewed (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "i").

6

Page 53: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

w. We inquired of Mr. Kumar if the District provides service in more than one urbanized area, or an urbanized area and a non-urbanized area. We were informed that the District serves the Los Angeles-Long Beach, Oxnard-Ventura-Thousand Oaks and San Bernardino-Riverside urbanized areas. We obtained the procedures for allocation of statistics between urbanized areas. We obtained and reviewed the worksheets and route maps and urbanized area boundaries used for alloc2ting the statistics. The procedures utilized by the District for allocation of statistics between urbanized areas appears proper and we noted no exceptions to procedures (Repor~ing

Manual Section 9 Test "w").

x. We compared the data reported on Form 006, Section 9 Statistics Summary, for the year ended July 1, 1989 to comparable data reported for the year ended July 2, 1988 and calculated the percentage change from the prior year to the current year.

Operating expense for UZA *039 has decreased by more than 10%. We inquired lf Mr. Kumar regarding the specifics of cflerations tl.at led ::0 t~1e ':'ec:..::ase in .:.h~ dc:.til re::l.:.tt.::'lE= t\) the prior reporting period. He indicated that the two primary factors were reduced service hours in fiscal year 1989 and a decrease in the number of reporting weeks in fiscal year 1989.

Other than as noted above, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and operating expense data have not increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. In connection with performing the procedures referred to in this report, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that any of the above statistics should have changed more than the mentioned limits.

Fixed guideway vehicle revenue miles and passenger miles data have decreased by more than 1 percent. We inquired of Mr. Kumar regarding the specifics of operations that led to the decrease in the data relative to the prior reporting period. He indicated that the decrease was due to the loss of tho fixed guideway lines during the year ended July 1, 1989, and a 25¢ rate increase over the previous year. He also indicated that the prior fiscal year was based upon a 53-week period while fiscal 1989 is a 52-week period. His explanati8rl of the changes appeared reasonable and consistent with other information we obtained in performing the procedures referred to in this report (Reporting Manual Section 9 Test "x").

The agreed-upon procedures are substantially less in scope tja~

an examination, the objective of which is an expression of an opinion on Form 006, Section 9 Statistics Summary. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Also, we do not express a~

opinion on the District's internal control str~cture cak2n 25 ~

whole.

7

Page 54: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

In performing the procedures, except for the information and findings described above, no matters came to our attention that caused us to believe that the information included in the Section 15 Report on Form 006 (Section 9 Statistics Summary) for the year ended July 1, 1989 is not presented in conformity with the requirements of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration Uniform System of Accounts and Records and Reporting System as specified in 49 CFR Part 630, Federal Register, Septerllber 25, 1987. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report relates only to the information described above, and does not extend to the District's general purpose financial statements taken as a whole, or the forms in the District's Section 15 Report other than Form 006, Section 9 Statistics Summary, for any date or period.

Los Angeles, California October 13, 1989

8

Page 55: 1989 - Section 15 submittallibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/finance/1989_SCRTD_Section_15_Submittal.pdf · Other (describe on Form 005) 5. o. Nature of contractual relationship (check

Our comments and follows:

Finding

f.

h.

findings based upon the above procedures are as

Description

Though the client represents that such reviews are performed, there is no evidence of supervisory review in the accumulation c: Section 9 data. This finding is consistent with that of prior year, as noted in the 1988 Section 15 report certified by DH&S.

SCRTD follows a sampling procedure other than those specified by UMTA. It is the auditor's understanding that the sampling method used by SCRTD is currently under review by UMTA to determine whether the minimum 10% precision requirement at a 95% confidence level is met. SCRTD has received support for such compliance in a letter dated July 11, 1989 from Multisystems, Inc. and NQrtheastern University. This finding is consistent witn that of prior year, as noted in the 1988 Section 15 report certified by DH&S.

9