©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 QIP Strategic Plan Proposal c....
-
Upload
georgia-brooks -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of ©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 QIP Strategic Plan Proposal c....
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 1
QIP Strategic Plan Proposal c. October, 1986
Arthur M. Schneiderman
Title
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 2 c. 10/28/86-QIP-1rev. 10/30/86
OBJECTIVES
to achieve widespread consensus on, and commitment to a set
of QIP goals to be achieved by the end of our next strategic
planning cycle (1992)
to establish an approximate 6 year plan identifying key
milestones and activities
to agree on a detailed 1987 QIP Plan that will:
convincingly demonstrate top management's ongoing commitment to QIP
clarify our current QIP status
reaffirm to the entire organization the "why and what" of QIP
build widespread confidence in the effectiveness of a systematic QIP
generate the momentum that will be needed if we are to meet our goals
ADI QIP LONG RANGE PLAN
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 3 10/10/86-QIP-2rev. 10/26/86
FACILITY: 4" wafer fab and assembly of bipolar IC's
built 1974, 1300 employees
OVERALL GOAL:
(1980)
"..to have our products rated #1 in quality by
more than 50% of our customers by 1985.."
RESULTS: defect levels reduced to 20 PPM (WSJ, 10/3/86)
average unit cost down by factor of 7
% customers rating them #1 in 1985:
linear products
TTL products
45%
60%
WINNERS OF 1985 DEMING PRIZE
"We've gone as far as we can in manufacturing. We are focusing on IC design for further defect reduction."
Kimio Nonaka, Manager of TQC
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, HIJI, JAPAN
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 4 c. 10/13/86-QIP-3
yearsSource: IMPRO 86, 10/9-10/86
PP
M
76543210
10,000
1000
100
10
customer measured defect levels
Hiji Plant, JapanTEXAS INSTRUMENTS
50 % improvement each:
10.3 months
de
fect
leve
ls
WSJ, 10/3/86
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 5 c. 10/26/86-QIP-4
PHASE:
QIP YEAR:
ACTIVITIES/
ORGANIZATION:
OUTPUTS:
STARTUP ROLLOUT INSTITUTIONALIZE
initi
al Q
IP s
tatu
s su
rve
y
div
isio
na
l QIP
Co
un
cils
corp
. Q
ua
lity
Ste
erin
g C
om
.
QS
C d
eve
lop
s
go
als
qu
alit
y m
an
ifest
op
olic
y d
ep
loym
en
tst
ruct
ure
s
QS
C f
ocu
s o
n:
pe
riod
ic q
ua
lity
au
dits
inte
rna
l/ext
ern
al P
R
1 2 3 4 5 6
QIP partof eachorganization'sculture
3-5 pilot projects all div's involvedin QIP activities
success stories
interest in QIPdemand forQIP training
GUIDINGTRAININGMONITORINGREWARDING
heroes
ADI QIP PLAN
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 6 c. 10/28/86-QIP-5
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
TOO
LS
autonomous div's
shared resources
flexibility
customer focusexternalinternal
organizational developmentparticipative mgmt.
innovation environment
information systems
personal growth
RESULTS
inno
vativ
epr
oduc
tpr
oces
s
mfg
. exc
elle
nce
qual
itypr
oduc
tivity
cycl
e tim
e
cust
omer
driv
ense
rvic
esu
ppor
tre
spon
sive
ness
coop
erat
iven
ess
Q PI
PROPOSED ADI QIP MODEL
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 7 c. 10/28/86-QIP-6
1987 QIP STATUS SURVEYOBJECTIVE:
to determine the current state of eachdivision/corporate's QIP activities
DIMENSIONS:
is there a QIP Council?membershipchartermeeting frequency
prospectives on QIP
Organization:
commitmentsense of urgency
are there QIP training programs?are there trained facilitators?
Projectshow many?how selectedwho participatedhow longuse of SQC or other tools?
Resultsquantitative measures of improvement(improvement curves)
ADI QIP STATUS REPORT
success stories challenges
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 8 c. 10/28/86-QIP-7
ADI 1992 QIP GOALS
EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE
To have our products rated #1 in
TOTAL VALUE
by more than 50% of our customers
based on:
right products
performance
quality/reliability
lead time
responsiveness
cooperativeness
price
delivery
support
willingness to form partnership
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 9 c. 10/27/86-QIP-8
ADI 1992 QIP GOALS
INTERNAL PERSPECTIVE
To constantly strive for the elimination of all
FORMS OF WASTE
at all entities, functions and levels within ADI
Manufacturing and Design
< 10 PPM defect levels
>99.8% on time delivery
<3 weeks lead time
<3 weeks mfg. cycle time
<20 weeks design cycle
25X reduction in active WIP
250X reduction in changeover times
Other Areas
timely financial reporting
reduced turnover
effective meetings
actionable information
perfect safety records
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 10 c. 10/27/86-QIP-9
DATA
INFORMATION
KNOWLEDGE
ACTION
THE KNOWLEDGE PYRAMID
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 11 c. 10/28/86-QIP-10
Ryuzaburo Kaku, Canon
waste in rejects
waste in parts inventory
waste in indirect labor
waste in equipment and facilities
waste in expenses
waste in design
waste in human resources
waste in operations
waste in production startup ofnew products
Taiichi Ohno, Toyota
(MUDA)
The Nine Wastes The Seven Wastes
waste in processing itself
waste of time
waste of making defective parts
waste of motion
waste of overproduction
waste of inventory
waste of transportation
FORMS OF WASTE
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 12 c. 10/27/86-QIP-11
TOP MANAGEMENT'S 1987 GOALS
Guide: quality manifesto
overall goals (quantitative and measurable)
steering committee charter
incentives implications
Get Trained:(on-going)
Juran on Quality Improvement
statistical methods
quality literature
Set Example: QIP projects (1-2 each)
e.g.: information systemscustomer interviews
Be Visible: regular "air time" to QIP
periodic (semi-annual?) QIP Audits
reward successes (non-financial)
annual QIP award?
integrate QIP into other activities
strategic planning
various Councils
various Staffs
10-20% of their TIME spent on QIP activities
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 13 Additional slides
Additional Slides Used
c. late 1986/early 1987
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 14 12/12/85- ZD3/QIP-12
KAIZEN INNOVATIONFOCUS
design, productionand marketing
science andtechnology
TARGETING
broad:quality, costsafety, efficiencyproduct development
narrow:featuretechnique
EXPERTISEconventional
know-howleading edge,break through
CAPITALNEEDS
very modestmajor
PROGRESSsmall steps big jumps
RESULTScontinuous spontaneous
VISABILITYnot dramatic very dramatic
INVOLVEMENTeveryone selected few
COOPERATIONgroup activityindividual
RECOGNITION resultseffort, process
EVOLUTION REVOLUTION
effort
vs.
investment
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 15 Deming Prize info
1985 Checklist for the DemingApplication Prize
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 16 12/16/85-ADI-2
REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Top Management
CommitmentSense of Urgency
Systematic
Method
Pilot ProjectsCompany Wide
Involvement
Organization/
Systems
leadership
changed objectives
hands-on management
visibility
support
profit opportunity
competition
fuel for change
proven results
kaizen
data driven
cross-functional
overcome skepticism
build credibility
get ball rolling
develop champions
weakest link
internal customers
policy deploymentvendors/customers
trainingguiding
:monitoringrewarding
:
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 17
Phase 1: 1985-1986
Tops-down Priorities
innovation process new product cycle time
standard cells/sub-cells
CAD
customer service causal/effect metrics
manufacturing process manufacturing cycle time
outgoing PPM
organization development
process
TBD
MIS process TBD
QIP Philosophy tops-down/bottoms-up
Staffing AMS
QIP Organization divisional focus
Training/Awareness management team
JQI (?)
c. 1986-QIP Status
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 18
month
% o
n tim
e de
liver
y
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Customer Service Performance
ANALOG DEVICES
ADS MED ADBV IPD CLD
Corporate Key
Key
Non-Key
Key Affiliates
1 6 12 1 6 12 1 6 12 1 6 12 1 6 12
8/7/86-ADI-15/150
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 19
causes of controllable latenessimp
rove
men
t ra
te (
half-
life
)
we
eks
of Q
IP a
ctiv
ity
% of controllable lateness
cause 10cause 9
cause 8cause 7
cause 6cause 5
cause 4cause 3
cause 2cause 1
100
80
60
40
20
0
PARETO ANALYSIS
weeks
% late
523926130
100
10
ADS
ADI CONTROLLABLE LATENESS PERFORMANCE
1
total
Wilm.Nor.
GOAL
10/17/86-ADI-18rev 10/28/86
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 20 c. 1986-Phase II Objectives
QIP OBJECTIVESPhase II
1987
•Deploy goals setting & implementation
•Establish divisional QIP councils
—quarterly reviews
•Identify divisional QIP priorities
—metrics
•Train all division staffs (JQI?)
—other levels
•Full time QIP facilitators
•Maintain visibility of Top Management commitment to QIP
—integrate into performance evaluation
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 21 c. 1986-Example of written reports
TITLE
Daily Shipments Tracking ReportDaily Delivery Statistics & Detail
CB/FlashWeekly Fact. Pert ReportEval UpdateEst Net Sales AnalysisWeekly Sales/Bkg StatFab infoLOG NP Crit Path StatIQC Weekly ReportOQC Weekly ReportDue & Overdues Thru wk____NP StatusWeekly Insp Report, ADKKCorp Strategic SummaryMask ShopLayoutNP Fab StatusWeekly Delivery ReportWafer Fab Slice Stats
IBM SQP Summary ReportAllocated Products(New Product) Turn TimeMonthly Models Report
Quarterly Fin ReportRep on Inq. Rec’d or Prospects ProducedTrim/Probe Report
Lots on Hold at CoordJan Qual Update
FREQUENCY
DailyDaily
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
??
SOURCE
P.C.P.C.
A.D.P.C.Rel.P.C.P.C.
LOG Mktg.LOG Mktg.
Q.C.Q.C.P.C.
Fab P.C.ADKK/Q.C.
Corp Sales AdminMask Fab
LayoutFab P.C.
P.C.Fab P.C.
Q.C.Customer Service
LOG Mktg.Sales/Data Processing
FinanceCorp Comm (73 pgs!)
LOG PTDE
Q.C. CoordQ.A.
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved.
Slide 22 Juran: Resp. of Qual. Council
Juran Institute, Inc.Organization For Annual Improvement:
Responsibilities of Quality Council