1970-71_v11,n01_Chevron

t -6ary robins, the Chevron

~i~~ety~ne people were arrested dads sut~rduy~s unitawur de~onstru~on in front of the U.S co~s~~~te ;in ~0rQ~to w~.e~ de~~~st~~t~rs reacted stro~~~~ to ~o~i~~ i~sist~~~e they keep off the street, ~~ive~sit~ of Waterloo student Bill ~Ja~kso~ burrow) was among the first to be forested aid s~~se~z~e~~t~~ charred with ~ssu~~t~~~ a police of~cer; other arrests were made as demonstrators counted ““Power to the peo~~e~~und took the de~o~st~~tio~ to Yonge street and the ~le~rt of the downtown s~a~~i~~ area,

ey shoot students, don’t they?

Campus Quiokies A STAFF NEEDED

&fth control center staftecf A group of students at the Uni- will also provide information on

versity of Waterloo have set up a therapeutic abortions. birth control center. The center will provide information to in- The center is situated in room terested people on the various 206 in the campus Center and will types of birth control devices, and be open every Wednesday from how to obtain them. The center 7-9 pm beginning may 13.

You can take youf voice and.. . This summer for the first time one who has a voice can sing.

there will be a music program on Instrumentalists are also need- campus. There will be a choir ed. If you play any kind of in- which will rehearse on Wednesday strument then get in touch, they’ll evenings from 7:00-9: 00 p.m. in find something for you to do. arts lecture, room 113, commenc- ing Wednesday, may 13th. Train- For further information call ed voices are not necessary - any- Ext. 2439, Alfred Kunz.

Campus centef starts librury feutufing modern fiction

A library has become the latest system for one week periods; innovation at the campus center. as the books become more than The project, initiated by campus one year old they will be forward- center turnkeys, will involve ed to the arts library. The collec- mainly purchasing books pub- tion will . not be political in lished no earlier than 1970 and composition, and is intended soliciting other volumes from basically for contemporary fic- any students, staff or faculty tion and general interest reading who might wish to be donors. - including the works of Quebec

The books will be free for use and french-language Canadian in the reading lounge or on a loan authors.

Agcape” Inc.? What afe you pushing? Agape Incorporated is not, as

might seem from the name, an aluminum siding company, or anything along that line. The weird name is derived from a greek word meaning the highest form of love.

One division of this is a group of students aged seventeen to twenty one running a recreation and crafts programme in St. Matthew’s Church (Benton and Charles), from 9:30 to 12: 00 on Saturdays for children in the downtown area. A ‘year ago they announced themselves by putting

up posters un downtown stores to attract the kids and now rely on word-of-mouth among the kids.

As they receive no financial backing from the church they’re free to have loosely-organized get-togethers. However, they’re hoping to expand their center’s operation to an additional three afternoons a week and in conse- quence need a larger staff.

If you like playing with kids or think you can learn something from them, then phone Lizz Pedd- le at 742-5527.

Ontario changes financing formula The government of Ontario

has recently changed its method of financing buildings on university campuses. Up to now, the government has paid 95 percent if the university could raise 5 percent. It now will pay the en- tire cost on a fixed amount per square footage basis where the footage allowable depends on the enrollment .

building expenses as the rate was

The fixed amount per square foot is not exnected to cover all

calculated according to 1968 building costs.

As a result, funding campaigns such as the Tenth anniversary fund will still be necessary in order to pay off present pledges and the difference of calculated and actual costs which may well continue to be about 5 percent.

general slush fund.

In the future, however, funding campaigns will likely be for par- ticular needs rather than for a

Essays and Theses to Type?

SPECIAL STUDENT RATES

RENTAL SALES SERVICE

ELECTRIC-PORTABLE - STAN-DAR0 (ask about our ren tal-ownershI;o plan)

Phone 745-WI&-open Daily till 5: 30 pm

*sport *News

“Sports

*Features

reporters and writers

Come to the meeting monday, 8 pm. chevron office, compus ten ter.

L

GO-GODANCER WANTED.

Fri & Sat evenings Hide - Away Room

in Grand Union Hotel

Call : Mrs. Ferguson 576-3669

WELCOME WELCOME , , Just -Around The Corner With The Just -Around The Corner With The First Service For University Students First Service For University Students

Drop In And See Us Drop In And See Us ‘Always Glad To See You ‘Always Glad To See You

Let Us Drive You To U. of W.

Bowrltown Kitchener I-- Opposite b

SPEED READING

Communications Services is again presenting courses in Efficient Reading at the University of Waterloo. The fee is $47.00 which includes all books and materials.

The course consists of ten 1 l/2 - hour weekly , lectures. Two classes will be offered.

Class 1 begins 4:30 p.m. Thursday May 28 Class 2 begins 7:00 p.m. Thursday May 28

Ir Both classes will be held in Engineering II, Room 1313.

Register at the office of the Federation of Students, in the Campus Centre. For more

’ information regarding courses phone Helga Petz at extension 2405.

.

‘

2 2 the Chevron A subscription fee included in their annual student fees entitles U of W students to receive the Chevron by mail during off-campus terms. Non-students: 58 annually, $3 Q term.

Send address changer promptly to: The Chevron, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.

Pollution probe hassles city council for inaction Pollution probe at the University

of Waterloo has had their first encounter with local government officials. At the last two meetings of Kitchener city council, members of probe presented briefs concerning water pollution in the K-W area. The briefs came in response to calls to the pollution probe office on april 16.

Two citizens informed probe that a, coloured effluent was running into Schneider’s creek from a storm sewer near manitou drive, south of fairway road.

Investigators took two samples which were sent to Ontario water resourses commission laboratory

in Toronto and to the city of Kit- chener industrial waste analysis laboratory. Colour photographs were also taken.

According to the Kiichener department of sanitation the sample contained .09 parts per million of cyanide. Their analysis also indicated 2.7 parts per million chromium. Chromium is known to cause severe gastric problems even when ingested in small am- ounts. The sewer samples also contained over seven times the legal level of suspended solids.

A local bylaw (No. 5634) pro- hibits discharge of any cyanide in storm sewers and also stipulates a

maximum of 20 parts per million of suspended solids in storm sewers.

Council’s reaction to the brief was generally apathetic, with the exeption of two members. Council members did not appear any more responsive when it was pointed out that a city well was located within twelve hundred feet of this open sewer.

This has been a long-standing pollution problem. As early as june 1967 the city sanitation engineer M.G. Thompson reported the company to be non-compliant with sanitation department requests, and were continually violating exist-

“Pobtw to the people ” became the ru/lying cry of demonstrators in Toronto after their protest turned toward the police,

F of s fees CUE for grads until mess is settled ’

On april 27 the federation received a written notice from administration president Howard Petch that the administration will cease collecting the FofS activities fee from grades until a final decision has been made concerning their membership in the federation.

The letter is in response to various objections to grad membership in the federation in the past year.

_ Opposition to grad membership

in the federation has existed since 1965 when a referendum permit- ted the federation to collect a compulsory activities fee from the students.

At that time, there were. 250 graduate students of whom 20 voted in favor of membership and 10 against.

The grad student union was then formed after several grads felt that the referendum had not obtained a majority opinion from the graduate students.

The rents on the married student housing residence have now been finalized at 130 dollars a month for a one bedroom ‘apartment and 150 dollars a month for a two bedroom apartment on a twelve month lease. The rent is higher on shorter leases.

The applicants initially understood that the rents would be 125 and 145 dollars, but they were not- ified in march that the rents would have to be increased 10 dollars.

Recently, the provincial government has decided to allot each university 25 dollars per student in order to pay taxes to the city municipality. .

This comes to 218 thousand for this year. The allotment will likely increase in coming years.

As a result, the university expec- ts to be able to use this sum in the payment of property taxes on the married student housing and thus be able to lower the rent by 5 dollars a month.

Because of the high rents, there was initially speculation that there would be difficulty in filling the 300 apartments this fall, but at present, 200 people have already paid their 50 dollar deposit and 89 others are expected to do so.

Other applicants will be ap- proached concerning the vacant apartments and if they are not filled by june 15, Waterloo Luth- eran will be asked if they have married students looking for housing. After that, any remain- ing apartments will be available to single students but it is not likely to happen.

A poorly attended general meeting of graduate students in march cast 60 votes in favor of with- drawal and 30 against out of about 16 hundred grad students. A second motion to transfer fees to the grad student union was almost defeated.

A letter from GSU president Gerald Fuller to the administration dated april 7 requested that the administration collect, the fee and keep it until October 31 when hopefully the wishes of the grad majority will be made known. In response to this and the past grievences- expressed by some grads prompted Petch to cease collection of the activities fee un- till it could be ascertained which organization it was for. This action was taken since the administration could not legally collect an unappropriated fee, and according to Petch, “This should provide an incentive for them to consider the question and get it settled.”

In the past, the federation policy has been not to permit any minority within the federation special status. The graduate student union wishes to determine the wishes of the graduate majority before taking further action, something no one has been able to do for five years.

Meanwhile, if the matter is not settled before fall registration, grad students will not be paying for activities from which they benefit and even the GSU agrees that they should help pay for.

ing water pollution bylaws. Thompson indicated that the

sanitary sewer system was in danger of collapsing as a result of er- osion by industrial wastes. He recommended that the company be given until august 1 to find means of treating their waste products.

Early this spring the sanitary sewer collapsed, costing the city an estimated 31 thousand in property damage. The city is at present attempting to sue for property damages, and still the city has not seen fit to enforce bylaw 5634.

Waste material from the collapsed sewer system was diverted in- to the storm sewer system. The. storm sewers are meant to carry off storm water, surface water, and drainage, but not sewage.

The city engineer, Bradley informed council on monday night that the sanitary sewer system has been repaired.

It seems that at this point, the city fathers are willing to fight for monetary remuneration but lack any noticable zeal to attack the underlying source of the issue.

Council first placed a deadline of january 1 1970 for the company

to provide plans for adequate treatment of wastes.

The electroplating company asked for and received an extention of this deadline until may 1. A deadline of august 1 for installa- tion had been extended until march of 1971. The sanitation department has also indicated to council that a number of other industrial companies are disregarding their corporate responsibilities in treatment of industrial pollutants. Pollution probe is planning a sur- vey of ‘each of the local companies cited in the sanitation department report.

In order to make their influence felt at city hall, pollution probe is sponsoring a membership drive _ throughout the summer months. Members of pollution probe will be speaking to local and district service organizations when requested.

. Literature will be diseminated on various aspects of the pollution problem. The membership committee is comprised of university students hired for the summer, on a commission basis.

CHEVRON ‘VOLUME 11 HEVRON VOLUME 11 C EVRON VOLUME 11 CH VRON VOLUME 11 CHE

It’s not really all that surprising, but the coverage by the national media of last Saturday’s demonstration in Toronto changed or omitted certain pieces of information which put the whole inci- dent in a different light. +

All the media hailed the city r’s- for the peep/e held at the city hall as an anti-protest protest. What they neglected to mention was that when the march to the U.S. consulate began, over 90 percent of the people participating in the city is for the people went to the consulate to demonstrate. Both crowds, one damned by the media while the other was praised, were composed of the same people.

The cops were stupid. They could have prevented all the rock throwing and window smashing simply by blocking the traffic from University Avenue. Then they wouldn’t have had to bring out the horses to clear the streets. That’s what provoked the crowds.. The police should have realized that it wasn’t physically possible to put that many people on the sidewalks.

They should have realized it, but they didn’t. After they managed to clear the streets, they decided to use the horses to clear the sidewalks as well. This time, however, the demonstrators weren’t able to get out of the way as easily, and many were trampled by the horses.-

One girl on the sidewalk, who couldn’t walk after being stepped

- on by a horse, was trampled again because she didn’t move when the police told her to. She ended up with a broken ankle.

People react against things, and the demonstrators reacted against the cops and their horses. Being stomped on by a horse doesn’t exactly bring to mind thoughts of love and peace.

Two Toronto newspapers reported that the demonstrators pulled the cops’ badges off their uniforms. That’s a blatent lie. None of the cops present were wearing badges at all. They took them off so that any demonstrators beaten or assaulted by police (and most of the 91 people arrested were beaten after their arrest ) would be unable to identify their assailent.

An important thing that perhaps the national media failed to realize was that Saturday’s demonstration became much more than an anti-war protest. Many of the demonstrators have come to realize that the war in Indochina did not fall from the sky, but there are certain things inherent in the capitalist system that runs the United States, and Canada, and many other countries, that create these wars. They have come to realize that to stop wars of imperialism, the power to make de- cisions must be put in the hands of the people.

Saturday’s demonstration was only the beginning.

Accompanying Phlegm, the no- torious satire by Maudie which re- turns to the chevron this term, will be a new column by Radio Wat- erloo mogul Bruce Steele.

Steele, who has worked with professional radio and entertainment in both North Bay and Lon- don has developed campus radio here from a fledgling beginning two years ago into a modern closed-circuit. operation serving students on and off-campus.

Says Steele about the column, “it will deal with my interpreta- tions of the media game in north america. . . newspapers, TV and radio. There will be little or no ex- planation of it. It just is.”

Look for . . . and kings every week on the inside back page.

This is the first issue of volume 11, The chevron will be publishing each friday throughout the summer until july 24. There will be one further issue august 14 before regular publication resumes in September. There will be- a chevron staff meeting monday night in the chevron off ice, campus center, at 8 o’clock. Please drop in.

friday 75 may 7970 (7 7: 7) 3

GAY GUIDE to CANADA, MEXICO & Western U.S. Most complete guide of its kind available. Get yours before summer vacation! $3. ADVOCATE Box 74695. Los Angeles, CA 90004

for gifts showing it’s the thought that counts

XPRESS BUS FROM TH CAMPUS CENTER TO THE WNGTON SUBVVAY STATION

fridayS: , departs- 3% pm from

campus eenter arrives - 530 pm at subway

TICKETS AVAILABLE AT THE CREATIVE ARTS OFFICE

DRIVER CAN NOT SELL TICKETS sptinsored by federation of students

Well, well, ;oo~who’s back to haunt you all again. Being without a summer job, I am forced to write this stuff so I can live off the Chevron freepizza every week. Of course I’ve been busy gathering goodies all spring and I hope that these new anecdotes will be kept by you for fond me- mories in scrap. books and junk boxes.

My first _ scathing attack. is directed at the other “paper” on campus, and particularily their eager reporter who excused the repair work in front of the physics building before it even started. It will cost nothing, you see, because it was guaranteed so the contrac- tor will fix it out of the goodness of his heart. Of course the profit he made on the original construc- tion has nothing to do with cover- ing repair costs, and even if it did, it still won’t cost anything because the whole useless mess didn’t.

The government paid for it, not the university. So it doesn’t matter if the money is burned because its free.

I am forced to conclude that whoever it was that decided to build up that area as is is, is perhaps being irresponsible, (remember the cost), or the other “paper” on campus is being irresponsible by waiving the university’s onus of spending the tax- payer’s money wisely. Shame.

* * * Secondly, I recently received

my invitation from Shell Oil for a credit card with a few pages of lies and half truths about credit cards. If you are a private pro-

perty buff, then Shell thieved my address from the directory (Fone- book).

If you think private property is bad, as Shell apparently does, then I think we should have a bon- fire somewhere in the middle of I the refinery, and maybe some fire works. Shell wouldn’t mind, its not their’s.

* * * I was talking to a person recent-

ly who has hired by a police force in Canada and was given no training into Canada’s laws (as opposed to the country he had been a cop in) and was given no pistol training. They didn’t even ask him if he knew how to shoot one! (He didn’t). He was simply accep- ted, and asked to report for work when he would be given his’ uni- form, AND HIS GUN, and go out on his first patrol. Fortunately, he never made it to work for them.

And while we’re at it, how come Kampus Kops get $3.25 an hour for working at pubs, and city cops (with pistols) get $5.00 an hour? Who would you rather have stop trouble, a stern voice with some understanding behind it, or a stern voice, judo, and a jail cell. If pub attendants and organizers are going to have to pay $5 an hour for a cop, why can’t they have that go to the Kampus Kops? Why, Al?

* * * Finally, the movie to see this

week, if its still on in town, is Antonioni’s Zabriski Point. Its

beautiful, surrealistic, and better than Antonioni’s Blow Up; come to think of it Zabriski Point could be called Blow Up TOO (OR TWO).

TODAY Licensed Dance with the Town Choir.

Sponsored by Eng 71. 8: 30 to midnight. Food services. SATURDAY

Orientation 70 meeting 2pm campus center music lounge.

Discotheque Pub Night. Sounds by the Fred’s Uprising Discotheque Show. Spon-

- sored by Warriors Rugger Club. 8:30

TUESDAY Pub with music by the Trollie and Whip-

lash. 1% with U of W ID, 50s without. Sponsored by Federation of Students. 8 : 30pm campus center pub.

THURSDAY Pub. Swingalong and dance. 8 to 12 Food

Services. Pollution Probe general meeting 8pm

DANCE

Town Choir

Food Sel’vices

ENG ‘71

Friday, May 15

8:30 - 1200

LISCENCED 1

4 4 the Chevron

by George Metesky Chevron staff

T.HE BOYS IN THE BAND You walk out of this one thinking. the B O Y S in

the Band is definitely not a musical, in fact it is .one of the heaviest pieces of cinema I’ve seen since B/o wup.

The flick starts out very innocuously, even for a film about faggots, but rather heavy hand of Mart Crowley quickly and too obviously transforms it into a ‘medium is the message’ film which is a little hard to handle at times.

For all intents and purposes the boys in the band are fellows from down the hall and across the street who happen to have slightly different attitudes to- wards sex than might be considered the norm. The setting is a birthday party for Harold.

Harold, and the people at the party, are without a doubt the most insecure people in New York City.

The language is in colour by shockappeal, and - this, with the subject matter, is the main box-office draw. The language may, I suppose, be offensive to some people, but I can’t think who, except perhaps a few grandmothers and spinster aunts.

The humour of the first half centers around the language and “perversion” and is typical of most

men’s washroom walls. “Who do you have to fuck are.und here to get a drink?” “You’ve .had dirtier things than that in your mouth.” etc.

Even these occasional chuckles deteriorate into a rather contrived attempt at character analysis via a party ‘game. Personalities lay gutted and bleeding on the broadloom and no holds are barred. Here the movie ceases to be one about queers in New York, and begins to analyse life in Home-Town N.A. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work too well, pri- marily because the laughs of the first half contrast too vividly with the Virginia Woolf ending.

The acting, of course, is superb. The people of the movie were also the people of the play and had plenty of time to rehearse. The direction leaves lots to be desired. The movement on the screen is often contrived, and the half in, half out of focus camera is a useless distraction. Special effects are non-ex- istent except for a rain-storm (events in nature parallelling the social situation, you know) which provides a highly symbolic scene of destruction at the end of the movie. Try as I would I couldn’t find any Christ imagery, although I’m sure there must have been some there somewhere.

1. 1 DISPOSABLE-THE DEVIANTS

Disposable is a record with many short-comings, and for some these would perhaps outweigh those compensating good qualities with which it is endowed, when it actually comes down to laying out bread to pay for it. Nonethe- less, because it is an unusual album, in some respects, it is difficult to assess according to those criteria which would normally apply in a judgement of that nature.

The band responsible for it- The Deviants-consists of, I think, eighteen members, more or less. Only a small number of these perform on any one cut, with considerable variation throughout, and thus a correspond- ing variation in quality.

Many of the songs are chanted more or less in a monotone rather than sung. The lyrics also tend to be rather weak and often pretty superficial. Thus it is left up to the music itself to be the making of the album.

In certain cuts they succeed admirably, especially on the first side. The instrumental sec-

tion on Somewhere to go and the harp solo on You’ve got to hold on are the best examples of this. In some of the other songs, unfortunately, the instrumentals are little more than wasted album space. I

Three other cuts deserve par- ticular mention. Let’s loot the supermarket on the first side is a really horrible song, recorded in practically the same vien as the Montreal version of Giv& peace a chance, except not so professional. At the end of the second side is a rather long chant about the last man on earth called, .appropriately, f8Sf man, . featuring banal lyrics to a back- ground of tasteless instrumental effects.

-And then, also on the second side, is the only cut with anything really resembling a tune, called Guaranteed to b/e& It also benefits from fairly intelli- gent words and reasonable in- strumentation. While this is scarcely a brilliant song it is one of the better on the album.

Bookings policy revised Last term, ancillary enterpris-

es director Jack Brown released a draft bookings policy that the federation feared would severely limit their sandbox activities on campus. Their urgency concerning the draft was magnified by the proposed effective date of may 1 and that the draft did not seem to be subject to further ne- gotiation with the parties affect- ed.

On april 20 a new draft was released with the introduction ex- paining” any problems, dis- putes, or changes with regard to this policy will be referred for settlement to a committee con- sisting of at the minimum of the president of the Federation of Students and the faculty societies plus a representative from the bookings office . . .”

The first draft gave bookings priority to the federation only for its four major weekends, which would mean that the federation would no longer be able to assume its role as organiser of events for students on campus who could in turn farm out the organizational work to enterpre- neurs.

Previously the federation and the bookings office were under a working agreement that federation. would receive priority on bookings after which facilities

would be open to other groups. The new draft, which will likely

become policy, gives federation priority over four events per month, rather than limiting it to two events per month without any priorities, as was previously suggested.

Federation of Students

NOTICE OF ‘BY-ELECTION

Nominations open May 19 to fill the following vacancies on Council : ENGINEERING: 3 seats MATHEMATICS: 1 seat ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: 1 seat

I Nominations close May 26

I- Nomination forms may be picked up in the Federation of Students office and returned to that office by 5:00 p.m. May 26.

RI~HARDHARRIS as “A MAIU

CALLEiHIORSE" DAILY from I:30 pm

PANAVISION*TECHNICOLOR~ @i@=’

ADULT ENTERTAINMENT

Peter mooie P&la Clark

MATINEE Sat. Sun & Monday 2 pm

Evenings from 7 pm Matinee Sat. Sun & Monday 2 pm Also “Love Cycles”

TRQ'HONE 5784600 l . NCC ClNW$ LIMIKQ

Friday 8 pm only Sat., Sun., Mon. at .2:00 - 6:oo - 9:oo Tues. at

AT BOTH THEATRES

Continuous daily Capital from I:30 - Drive-in starts at dusk

I WALTDISNEY productions

pCOUWStS BZNG~IA!B!BZW~ TECHNICOLOR’ al.3 @ 1970 Wall Chsney Ptaductmns

Above not shown at K-W Sunday - Replacing it “DUSK TO DAWN HOLIDAY SHOW” (6 features)

2ND HIT Ursula cl Andress “Southern Drive-m s Star” “DUSK TO DAWN

HOLIDAY SHOW” Sunday onlv

1 1

ONFECTIONER

First Annual

LAND - WATER RELAY

TUESDAY . MAY 19

5Pm

Columbia Lake

Adult Entertainment - Above-olus 3 extra features”

friday 15 may 197Qil(I,.I:,I) 5 ;D

Obtain Rules and Make your Entry

By: Monday May 18 B.S.A. Pub Night To follow at 8:30 Free admission for all participants

- - Y u ” u

I

TUESDAiY

101 .with U. of W. I.D.

This, coupled with economic trouble and extensive dissent at home, forced the French to look to the United States for direct military aid (the U.S. had, by this time, contributed $2 billion to the french effort).

The appeal found zealous adherents in Washing- ton, namely vice president Nixon, chairman of the Joint chiefs of staff Radford, and John Foster Dulles. These men agreed with France that it would be a disaster if the effort in Indo-China were not continued.

“1 r ‘.A L s’ Sk j ~.,” ” <‘ . _ ,>‘:’ f, i , , ’ .,d ’ 1,/_ _,A? / I/ :‘lr , :’ 7 ,) ,,, ‘ , -

Eisenhower, in his memoirs, defines in traditional american terms what “disaster” means: “The loss of all Vietnam, together with Laos on the .west and Cambodia on the southwest, would have meant the surrender to communist enslave- ment of millions. On the material side, it would have spelled the loss of valuable deposits of tin and prodigious supplies of rubber and rice.” a

The U.S. government, anxious as always to prevent disasters of any* sort, agreed to intervene (with bombers and troops) provided the intervention would be an allied one. Churchill and Anthony Eden, to their lasting credit, refused to support any such intervention on the grounds that it might well lead to a third world war. Thus the “disaster” was not forestalled-at least for the French. The fall of Dien Bien Phu on may 8, I954 hastened acceptance of the accords of the Geneva Conference and the end of the french phase of the Indo-China war.

The terms of the Geneva accords provided for, among other things, a general election to be held in July, 1956 for the purpose of uniting the pro- visional zones of north and south Vietnam and to be supervised by an international control commission.

In addition, the conference forbade th.e estab- lishment of any military alliances with, or bases under the control of any foreign state. The after- math of the conference is well known; again we find the freedom-loving government of the U.S. trying to avoid “disaster”. They could do this only by attempting to undermine the provisions of the Geneva accords. allow the 1956 elections to take place.

In his memoirs, Dwight Eisenhower pointed out that he had “never talked or corresponded with a person knowledgeable in indo-Chinese affairs who did not agree that had elections been held as of the time of the fighting, possibly 80 percent would have voted for the communist Ho Chi Minh as their leader.” And Wa// Street Journal on July 23, 1954 reported that “The U.S. is in no hurry for elections to unite Vietnam; we fear Red leader Ho Chi Minh would win. So Dulles plans first to make the southern half a showplace- with American aid. ” Showplace indeed!

This “showplace”, which has now cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, first took the form of the government of the cour- ageous Vietnamese freedom fighter, Ngo Dinh Diem-a catholic member to Vietnam’s feudal aristocracy, a member of the french colonial civil service, and a vicious anti-communist who was groomed (from 1950-1953) for his new position by progressive american forces such as cardinal Spellman, Joseph Kennedy, general Lansdsdale, and Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.

By the time july, ,1956 arrived, Diem, who had consolidated his hold on the south through the use of massive aid from the Americans (by this time he had received $500 million) and a policy of indefinitely detaining in concentration camps all those who, to use Diem’s words, “are considered dangerous for national defense and public security”, was in a secure enough position to refuse to allow the elections.

- ward democratic reforms and rationalization of the largely feudal economy, led to the rise of an indigenous, broadly based guerilla movement in South Vietnam.

By 1961, the guerilla movement had become a serious threat (i.e., “disaster” was threatened again) to the U.S. and massive american intervention was begun. We are all familiar with what ha,s followed. The showplace is shattered every day in the headlines of our newspapers and

.

6 6 the Chevron

“live” over the television. Showplaces do not hold up well under 2.5 million tons of bombs.

After Dulles, Nixon and their associates were forced to abandon their 1954 plans for direct military intervention in southeast Asia, they drafted a new proposal, namely the creation of the so- called Southeast Asia treaty organization (SEA- TO). The United States government, from 1955 to the present, has insisted that SEATO covers Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos.

It should be pointed out, however, that repre- sentatives of none of these countries signed the treaty and, ‘in fact, were expressly forbidden to do so by the terms of the Geneva accords. The treaty provides a basis for intervention in any state or territory in the region which is attacked by an external force or whose “political independence” is threatened by internal strife. ln brief, and it has become increasingly evident in the last fifteen years, SEATO serves as, in spite of its patent illegality, a potential rationalization for any american intervention that might take place in Southeast Asia.

“SEATO”, wrote Walter Lippmann in 1954, “is the first formal instrument in modern times which is designed to license international intervention in internal affairs. ”

This license has served the U.S. well; the U.S. now has control of the “official” governments in South Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand. Cambodia, however, faced the United States with a problem that their license could not readily and quietly deal with, namely the deeply entrenched neutralism of the kingdom of Cambodia.

In the early 1950s secretary of state Dulles branded the concept of neutrality as “dangerous and immoral”. And by refusing to participate in SEATO prince Sihanouk of Cambodia faced the possibility of having the purifying fires of american intervention brought down upon his “immoral” head. United States Ambassador Mc- Clintock, after failing in his attempt to convince Sihanouk that membership in SEATO was for his own good, became more blunt: “If Cambodia goes back on her desire to participate in the war against Communism, it can provoke congress in- to refusing to Cambodia not only military aid but economic aid as well.” The United States understood quite well the obvious fact that without U.S. military “aid” solidly entrenched in Cambodia

SEATO would prove ineffective as an instrument of american domination in Southeast Asia; even neutralism spelled “disaster” for the U.S. But even the categorical “proofs” offered Sihanouk by Allen Dulles, head of the CIA, of impending, massive communist aggression failed to move him. Let us see why.

) A..‘ ._ i : t .’ ^ ‘. -< i .’ _j ,I Prince

, . ; : i 1 .‘~ ) +,LI Sihanouk’s reasons for.rejeLting all forms

of U.S. aid are best summed up in Robert Scheer’s interview with him in 1965. His reflections are quite revealing so ’ he will be quoted at some length :

“our decision to reject United States aid in all its forms must be placed in a general context: repeated aggressions by the South Viet- namese; permanent and insufferable hostility of the South Vietnamese and Thai people, United States allies, who give wide support to our own rebels, the so-called “Free Khmers” of Son Ngoc Thanh and Sam Sary; the fanatic campaign against Cambodia and her regime of almost all of the american press that speaks of us as ingrates, pocketing the United States’ money while serving Red China”, etc.

“In passing I would call it to your attention that if Cambodia is not able to offer herself the luxury of a Capitalist economy (which would put her under the fist of several rich businessmen and foreign powers), she has not on the other hand adopted the Communist system. Private interests still control a large sector, notably in the realm of agriculture and small and medium industry. If they are able to prove their capacities in these areas, the State will not wish to assume any new control. In taking over the control of the banks, of the import-export trade and insurance, the government has assured itself of a revenue that the foreigner had in the past counted on for his own profit.”

Not a particularly immoral stand. The United States, however, saw things in a quite different

HE PRESENT UNITED STATES INTERVENTION into Cambodia must be understood as a continuation and, perhaps, culmination of american policies in southeast Asia which have rbeen-in varying degrees-in effect since the middle 1950s. In no sense does the invasion and its attendant

“justification” mark the birth of any drastically new asian policy. In april of 1954, the french colonial forces in Indo-China found themselves facing a grave crisis. The plan to break the back of the forces of liberation in Vietnam by the end of the 1955 fighting season was proving to be a failure on the grand scale. In a type of war where experts ’ hold that the defending force must hold a 10-l superiority of force in order to “win”, the french edge of 1.2-1 spelled anything but impending victory.

~west: s

light. Dulles’ analysis of neutralism as “immoral and dangerous” proved to be only half correct. For danger%us it proved to be; dangerous, that is, to Sihanouk’s government.

The pressures promised by Ambassador Mc- Clintock began to be applied by late 1955. Under strong U.S. pressure South Vietnam and Thailand closed their borders with Cambodia and began an extensive economic blockade. “Free Khmer” troops trained in Thailand with american aid began regular raids into Cambodia. “Accidental” american ’ bombing runs and defoliations began to grow geometrically. At the same time the Cambodian minority in South Vietnam came under severe repression.

Diem suspected the Khmer (Cambodian) minority of being contaminated with the “ideology of peace and neutrality”, an ideology they must have gotten from the immoral Sihanouk. For this reason and also, perhaps, because of the personal grudge born by Diem against Sihanouk because of his refusal to recognize the legalitv of the South‘ Vietnamese government, Diem launched a campaign to “assimilate” the 400,000 Vietnamese Khmers.

Diem’s campaign consisted of prohibiting the teaching of the Cambodian language in their schools, persecuting the politically influential buddhist monks, prohibiting communication between Cambodian-born Vietnamese and Cambo- dians, and forcing the Viet Khmers to adopt vietnamese names. By 1957 the repressive measures of Diem led to spontaneous demonstrations by the Viet Khmers. These demonstrations were ended by the government slaughter of hundreds of members of the minority. .

I ..“., * F I “’ - j ” J! ^ &; .,;re’s;s;;e w;;p;ession by & buppet .&

gime in Saigon continued and grew through the 1960s and led to a crisis in may of 1965 when Si- hanouk broke off diplomatic relations with the United States. This followed repeated wa’rnings that U.S.-south Vietnamese interventions into the territories of Cambodia would lead to severance of diplomatic relations.

Prince Sihanouk outlined the conditions that would have to be met if relations were to be again normalized between the two countries: “The day when the planes supplied by the Unit- ed States (and piloted by Americans) no longer bomb our territory, when the american tanks, ac- companied by South Vietnamese troops, directed by american advisors, no longer penetrate our frontier villages carrying death-the day when A merica will have recalled her troops from our lndo-China, then our relations will inevitably re- lax. I’

American intervention went on, as was to be expected, unabated.

In 1969 Cambodia’s delegate to the United Na- tions general assembly presented a list of 7000 violations of Cambodian territory by United Sta- tes-Saigon forces. These violations were reported to have led to the deaths of 300 Cambodians and the wounding of 700. No violations were attributed to north Vietnamese or National liberation front

troops. In any case, : what the consequent immorality” might b terioration of the pol of the United States matic relations with to respect the sovereig

It is interesting to U.S. government senl bassy was composed and CIA personnel. J engineered the overt1 ment in Guatemala, dor in Bangkoi.

Immediately after t “accidental” chemica .against Cambodian rp in april.

Several months aftf the Cambodian press ious, racist attacks o in Cambodia (coincic are-said to have rece. In a visit to Phnom PI Burchett, the australi, that the U.S. would assistance as soon as more attractive to fo attitude toward the “fr

In short, it might b being laid for the COI prince Sihanouk was 01

Burchett, in his 1: Story of the Guerilla pile of interesting dc by the National liber; special forces base in ments, among other tional plans of Camb mers”) who were erg; soil with U.S. dollar-5 overthrow the neutr, Sihanouk.

It now appears that

k, realizing- full well his “government of

the progressive de- nd military position lam, resumed diplo- . with their promise ‘ambodia. at the new staff the n its re-opened em- of military attaches

lrifoy, the man who the Arbenz govern-

: the new ambassa-

6 ‘i j” . b , . . t * ;; . rican return, a huge re attack toqk place lantations. This was

various members of a campaign of vic-

sietnamese minority r, these newspapers sidies from, the U.S.) ctober, 1969, Wilfred nalist, was informed Cambodia economic uk made the country id and improved his Id”. that the ground was larch, 1970 in which w-n. rk, Vietnam, Inside

reports seeing a ts captured in 1963 ont at the Hiep Hoa Vietnam. These docu-

exposed the opera- traitors (“Free Kh- on South Vietnamese s and instructors to bvernment of prince

troops entered Cam-

bodia in j969 in ,the guise of “defectors” from Thailand, defectors who were immediately given sizable cash awards. Interestingly, the credit for these mysterious, large-scale defections was given to general Lon Nol, the leader of the march

coup. Evidence is beginning to point to the con- clusion that these defectors formed the bulk of the forces used by Lon No1 for the coup.

The march coup was presented to the world as an attempt to make Cambodia into a government that was really neutralist. The Lon No1 re-. gime repeatedly emphasized (and indeed is still emphasizing) that Cambodia under Sihanouk had not been a neutralist country but had been a haven for north Vietnamese and NLF troops. In- terestingly, the International control commission (with a zealous Canadian member) had not been able to turn up any evidence showing an NLF presence in Cambodia.

In addition; during the last several weeks the french press-who learned in a rather painful manner the realities of southeast asian politics -emphasized that the decisive role being played in the fighting against the Lon No1 regime is by the National United front (i.e., Cambodian gue- rillas) and not by the “VC.“. Given the immense popular support enjoyed by Sihanouk and his government, such accounts seem wholly plau- sible.

What seems to have happened in Cambodia is a repeat performance of the old Diem show in which a “‘freedom loving I* reactionary government is set up by ihe United States in order to es- tablish “independence I* and ‘self-determination -’ for its people.

The immorality that Dulles attributed to Cam- bodia has now been purged from the body politic of southeast Asia. The-“new morality”, which is the illicit product of the wedding of the mutual needs of the Lon No1 regime and its U.S.-Saigon mentor, is not, however, particularly encourag- ing.

Premier Pham Van Dong of North Vietnam in a recent interview (cf. “New York Review of

Books”, Jan. 29, 1970) proposed that the policy of “Vietnamization” of the Vietnam war with its attendant troop withdrawals is in fact a grand, american design to win the war.

He sees this policy as an indication that the U. S. is prepared to outlast the NLF and the North Vietnamese in a long war of attrition by reducing the troops to a level palatable to the american public, by using fewer draftees and more volun- teers, by raising the specter of a bloodbath if U.S. troops withdraw, and by moving american troops into largely defensive enclaves while increasing the number and force of indiscriminate bombing raids. When Richard J. Barnet, director of the Institute for policy studies, related Pham’s assertions to “a high state department official” he replied, “Well, they got the message.” The U.S.-supported coup in Cambodia is well geared toward a lengthy continuation of the war in Viet- nam. The U.S. understands clearly that actively pro-U.S. regimes must be ensured in the countries around Vietnam if its massive intervenl tions are to continue and enjoy the possibility of success:

The U.S. invasion of Cambodia is an attempt to shore up the Lon No1 regime which is now find- ing itself facing what appears to be the embry- onic form of a people’s war not unlike that which arose in Vietnam. under Diem. Nixon’s assertion that once’the haven for Communists in Cambodia is “cleaned out” the war in Vietnam will come quickly to an end must be seen as patently ab- surd. Hopefully such nonsense is a tactical smoke- screen rather than an indication that the president has begun to believe his own empty rhetoric.

In any case, a quick look at the map will show that the bases in South Vietnam hardest hit by recent NLF attacks are those which are farthest from the alleged Cambodian sanctuaries. Even the most minimal understanding of guerilla war- fare would point out that this mystical “central base camp” for operations in South Vietnam, which the U.S. is now attempting to find, is a phantom, ,a phantom not unlike those pursued by the U.S. military command in Vietnam for the last ten years. Perhaps the Liberation Front -is

. . . .

being secretly guided from a computer center in Trinidad!

Immediately one might reply that it would be insane for Nixon to continue the war and, clearly, the troop withdrawals must be indicative of peaceful intentions. Hopefully such an analysis is correct, but there are many reasons for thinking otherwise.

Agreed, the consequences of continuing the war become more familiar and increasingly re- pulsive every day: uprisings on the campuses and in the ghettos; increasing disequilibrium in the balance of payments which triggers “dollar crises”‘; bigger budget deficits and more infla- tion with its attendant unemployment; to say nothing of the increasingly unacceptable accumu- lation of american war dead.

,

But these disasters must be seen’as minor in comparison to the disaster that would be faced by the U.S. if it withdrew from Asia, namely, the loss of its control over what it so lewdly calls the “free world”. And it appears that Nixon understands this quite well.

As was indicated briefly above, american leaders defined their early interest in Vietnam largely in economic terms. That economic motivation is still, at least to some extent, onerative in american policy formation re southeast Asia was indicated quite nicely by the vice president of the Chase Manhattan bank when he wrotein 1965: “In the past, foreign investors have been somewhat wary of the over-all political prospect for the (southeast Asia) region. I must say, though, that the U.S. actions in Vietnam this year-which have demonstrated that the U.S. will continue to give effective protection to the free nations of the region-have considerably reassured both Asian and Western investors.”

To insist, however, that the U.S. is in southeast Asia only because of its natural resources and the opportunity it affords for investment would be to invite ridicule; the cost of America’s adventure in southeast Asia far outweighs the direct economic advantages to be obtained there. But it would be even more ridiculous to separate analysis of the american intervention in Asia from the broader context of U.S. foreign policy in general, which remains fundamentally linked to economic motivations. To make such a separation would be to preclude any significant understanding of the meaning of the american presence in Asia.

The economic structure of the United States has become so large and so extremely complex and diversified that removal of even a small quantity of any. important raw material from prqduc- tive processes could prove to be disastrous. Around 1930 the United States began to suffer from quite an extensive annual deficit of raw materials. This situation forced the U.S. to increasingly rely on imports from other, mineral abundant regions. By 1960, America was import- ing 32% of its iron ore, 98% of its bauxite, 35% of its lead, 60% of its zinc, and 100% of its cobalt and chromium. That such, a situation calls for ri- gid control through foreign policy measures was expressed in 1954 in a report by the. president’s commission on -foreign economic policy: “Both from the viewpoint of our long-term economic growth and the viewpoint of our national defense, the shift of the United States from the position of a net exporter of metals and minerals to that of a net importer is of overshadowing significance in shaping our foreign economic policies . . .

‘.: ‘ I_ , . . A ‘ . I

‘At present . . . . - , L i h c / ; ;

a

the United States ‘is fully self- sufficient only in coal, sulfur, potash, molybde- num, and magnesium.” In brief, many indust- tries central to the “well-being” of the american economy must have plentiful supplies of these scarce materials or “go under”.

The underdeveloped countries of the world have become the chief dependable source of scarce raw materials for the United States. The integration of these Third World economics into’ the sphere of the monopoly capitalism of the United States repeatedly results in the loss of economic self-sufficiency for the supplying countries. Inso- far as their economic structures become nothing but vehicles for the supply of raw materials to the U.S. at prices agreeable to the buyers, the flexi- bility of productive structures necessary for economic and cultural growth is stunted or, in many cases, completely lost.

The Third World countries are, in brief, not backward because of any genetic stupidity or

* continued on page 8

Scott Arnold, originally from Chicago, is a. University of Waterloo student prepar- ing his MA. thesis in philosophy. lllustra- tions are from the New York Review of books, december 69 and march 70. Desjgn: Alex Smith.

friday 15 may 1970 (I 1: I) 7 7

. feedback Mathews overstates case; what’s his game anyway?

It is a pity that in his recent Waterloo talk about the canadiani- zation of universities professor Mathews over-stated his case. Nearly everyone in his audience agreed that it is vital to nurture Canadian culture, that it is natural for foreigners to hire other foreigners, and therefore that a strong effort should be made to find Cana- dians for faculty positions. Yet he alienated many Canadians as well as sympathetic foreign-born listeners with his over-emotive language.

What he said about foreign-that is, american-domination of our country is probably correct, but he shouldn’t have said it the way he did. It is difficult to escape the

feeling that if professor Mathews had been born in Quebec he would be a Separatist, or further, that if he had been a german aca- demic thirty-five years ago he would have endorsed “german physics, ” “german chemistry,” or “german mathematics.”

Certainly the fire had to be lit; statistics such as those quoted by professor Steele do not incite action, but Mathews demonstrated that while the issue is serious, he is not. Because he must know by now what effect he is having. He is purposely using bad political tactics in a political issue. Why? What is his first priority? What is his game anyway?

D. APLEVICH asst prof

) * from page 7 laziness on the part of their inhabitants - or because they lack raw materials. for industrializa- tion. Rather, they are impoverished because their natural resources are, in effect, stolen by american imperialism for the satisfaction of the immense needs of its own industrial base.

What has been presented here largely as an assertion is extensively explored, supported, and greatly expanded by economists such as H. Mag- doff, Pierre Jalee, and Andre Gunder Frank; the . interested or sceptical reader is urged to consult the works of these authors.

Although economically weak and, often, so- cially backward, the countries of the Third World are, at least in one important respect, in a position of great strength vis-a-vis the United States: their hands control the tap regulating the flow of essential materials into the U.S. The U.S. government knows this, and this awareness forms the central core of its policies regarding anti-imperia- list liberation movements-or; as we have seen, even regarding strategic neutral governments -in the Third.World.

Revolution in the developing countries means, most basically, the will to control their own deve- lopment. This entails breaking the stranglehold of the exploitive advantages now enjoyed by the U.S. In this context the american presence in Asia can be understood.

The fact that southeast Asia, when compared to the cost of the war there, is not particularly valuable for the U.S. indicates all the more clearly its commitment against and understanding of revolutionary movements. The american government understands full well that Vietnam and,indeed, all of southeast Asia must be made an ex- ample to other emerging nations of what will happen to them if they attempt to cast off the im- perial yoke. For this object lesson no costs (or, apparently, lives) will be spared; the U.S. cannot afford to withdraw from southeast Asia. That the U.S. cannot afford a defeat in Asia does not mean that they will not be defeated. They, providing nuclear weapons are not used, will be thrown out of Asia.

The war in Asia marks the. beginning of the end of american control of the Third World. Wars of liberation are political wars, wars that cannot be won by military means alone. The United States, insofar as its interests are dia*metrically opposed to those of the people of the emerging nations, is forced to fight a strictly military war, the inadequacies of which have become in-

4 creasingly evident in southeast Asia.

Military rule at home? The U.S. is in grave trouble in Asia as well as at

home. And bourgeoisies in trouble have traditionally turned to the military for salvation: for ex- ample, Nazism, Guallism, and the japanese situation in the 1930s. That Nixon’s chief advisor has become the Pentagon is fairly clear from the invasion of Cambodia. In any case, it is certain that we are witnessing the dissolution of “liberal capitalism” in the United States. Whether this dissolution can be controlled by the government and turned into the force-propped stability of a military or quasi-military government may well depend on the ability of american leaders to convince the working class-whose economic position must certainly decline with the loss of sources of super-profit in the Third World-that their economic plight is the result of the activities of students and blacks. It seems unlikely, however, that the United States, who\ cannot militarily defeat a revolution in Asia, could talk itself out of one at home.

PERSONAL Kindergarten teacher will baby sit- in

my home weekdays, central Waterloo. 5789023. FOR SALE

62 Envoy for parts. Phone 7452516 ask for Rick or Renzo.

Yamaha 305, 1967, 14,006miles. Good condition, needs a little work, tuneup etc. $350. Call Bryan 578-7290. WANTED

Wanted Volkswagen motor. Phone 745- 2516 early in the morning. Ask for Rick or Renzo. RIDE AVAILABLE

Persons interested in a ride to Van- couver around May 20 please call 648-2757. TYPING

Typing done efficiently and promptly. Mrs. Marion Wright, 745-1111 during office hours, 745-1534 evenings. I

Typing done at home (close to university). Phone 578-3036 or contact Graham Greathead, local 2761.

Will do typing in my own home. Phone 743-5789. HOUSING AVAILABLE

Furnished rooms, share kitchen with other student, parking. 83 William west. Phone 744-5809.

Single room for rent, male student, kitchen facilities, linen supplied, close to university. Phone anytime 744-7424.

Coop has rooms by the dav or week. Arrange to suit your needs. Reservations call 743-4083.

For summer term double room, own entrance, shower, kitchen, telephone, big private parking in new quiet home near university. Dale Crescent. Phone 5784710.

Sublet may 1 to September 1 furnished two bedroom, two bathroom anartment. Phone 578-2192.

Coop is a five minute walk from the plied, two kitchens, livingroom, parking, university. $290 is $200 closer than the vil- close to university. 128 Erb Street West. lage. 7434083. 7438476.

Furnished air-conditioned bachelor a- partment, pool, available july 1 to august 31. $139 monthly. 576-1422 (5-9pm )

Single room for rent three blocks from university. 259 Sunview street after four.

Still want a place to stay? Try and believe coop’s low rental rates. 7434083.

Wanted two girls to share Townhouse 25 minute walk from campus. Call 578- 2538 after 4pm.

Noisy? Hot? Keep your cool! Get away from it all. Rent quiet, clean basement room, private entrance and bath. Fluo- rescent light over 5 foot desk. Insulated walls and ceiling, five minute walk to engineering building. Apply 204 Lester.

Single room with breakfast available now, double room May 30th. Full use of home. Outdoor pool. Washing included. Call Mrs. Wright 745-1111 weekdays, 745-

Five double rooms to rent. Linen sup- 1534 evenings.

Welcomes the Students back from thei? work terms

FOR STYLE SERVICE & SATISFACTION

We invite you to visit your Barber Shop at The

Campus Centre ADVOCATE - GAY NEWS

Get your copy of the only. Gay newspaper that IS a newspaper. News and features of direct interest PO gays. Sample issue: 50~ to ADVOCATE, Box 74695, Los Angeles, CA 90004

WECUTIT-THE WAYYOUWANTIT

OPEN Tues to Fri 8:30- 5i30 Closed Sat 9-l Mondays *

CAMPUS SHOP

Your Shop operated by Students

UNIVERSITY JACKETS-

Winter - Gold Terylene Squalls ‘-- Navy and Gold Leather Jackets Crests - Available

UNIVERSITYJEWELLERY & CRESTS -Lighters, Mugs, Lapel Pins, Rings

SQUASH RACQUETS SQUASH BALLS AND HAND BALLS

S weatsuits, Ping Pong

Racquets and balls

Adidas Running Shoes,

Gym, Rom, Olympiade

and Mexicana

CONFECTIONERY ITEMS.

Cigarettes, Cigars, Chocolate Bars Gum and other assorted goodies

r Located in the Basement of The Campus Centre

.‘. a . R the Chevron

DIRECTORY : Applidations are invited for the position of editor of the Student Directory for 1970 - 71.,

Applications should be submitted to ‘the chairman Board of -Publication by friday, june 22, 1970.

Board of Pubs &‘ed of Students

Address letters to feedback, the Chevron, U of W. Be concise. The Chevron reserves the right to shorten letters. Letters must be typed on a 32 character line. For legal reasons, letters must be signed with course year and phone number. A pseudonym will be printed if you have a good reason.

For The Best in Submarine Sandwiches

The Yellow Submarinee HAM ............................... .8Oq: SALAMI ........................... .8Oc PEPPERONI ..................... .8Oq: KIELBOSA. ........................ .8Oq:

SPICED HAM ..................... .8Oc MINCED HAM ..................... .8Oq: CHICKEN LOAF ................... .8Oq:

NUCLEAR SUBMARINE .......... $1.05 All of the above seven meats and the works.

MONDAY SPECIAL ATOMIC NUCLEAR ..................... .8Oq:

Reply to article hits big business and farm scene

SUNGLASSES -INCENSE BODY PAINTdEwELLERY

I’d like to add a few comments to Ron Sauve’s report about Mr. Miller’s lecture on farm economics. I don’t recall Mr. Miller criti- cizing big business for trying to keep farmers on the farm. Per- haps Ron could tell us why they are setting up their own commer- cial farms. It’s sort of like keep- ing money in the family. Certain- ly the feed companies urge the farmer to produce more. But who owns most of them.

I’d like to give a couple of examples which control the market to a large extent.

Canada Packers owns 24 feed plants in Canada and the US under the name ‘Shurgain’ and ‘Leth- bridge Feed Mills’ in the west. They also happen to own 11 meat processing plants with 17 branches under Canada Packers Ltd. and 6 other names. They also like to keep their fingers on Australia. They own Feathers Industries Ltd., creameries and poultry stations, canneries, a couple of leather companies (Acton & Aurora). They don’t own the shit on the farm yet, so they had a company to sell some to the farmer. Canada Packers also owns a few farmers not worth mentioning.

How about Maple Leaf Mills. I’ll briefly list what they own:

-seed and vegetable oil companies

-flour mills, Master Feed, Quak- er Oats, Monarch, Purity.

-bakeries, cereal -transport companies elevators, total storage capacity

9.4 million bushels -feed companies -farms, individual poultry farms, hatcheries

Skyline Farms Ltd. and Quaker Oats Farms If Ron Sauve ever heard of the

Barker Corn-mission report he would know that it’s cheaper to buy a tractor overseas and import it than to buy the same one here. No use telling where the difference disappeared (roughly $1,000 more or less, mostly more). The methods the machinery companies use to prevent this would make an article in itself.

Sure the government is thinking about giving $140 million for summer fallow. If that is all the farmer has to show for his income then he probably wouldn’t have enough to live on. What about the labor market, if all these farmers had to look for jobs? (Didn’t want to bring politics in.). What about a huge windstorm while the prai- ries are all bare with nothing to keep the soil down? Sounds like something from the thirties.

We’re already giving food to some countries. Scientists were figuring out how to make wheat taste like rice because some of the people in the far east didn’t like it. Don’t laugh. It’s like Canada having to eat rice for a couple of months. I’d complain too. The farmer cannot afford to give anything away, even if the prices he now gets are none too impressive. The government has to do this so that everyone shares in the task and foots the bill. Have you ever heard of the corporations giving anything away out of the goodness of their hearts. Even Peter Jack- son has to cry about $lO,OpO.

Also the idea of giving the under: developed countries the tools to produce their own food is not at

all threatening to the Canadian farmer.

It’s threatening to big business. Why give it away if you can sell

it? We’ve sent farmers and scientists to other countries to improve their agricultural production.* It was on behalf of the Canadian government and not big business.

What would happen, Ron, if some of the profit that the big companies make (and don’t say they don’t) was reduced so that prices were the same but the farmer received more so that his standard of living could increase to almost minimum standards. There certainly isn’t any sense in the chairman of GM receiving a nom- inal salary of $800,000 plus a year. I’m sure he wouldn’t be in the poorhouse if he made about $20,- 000 (just an arbitrary figure so that he could remain in the upper income bracket).

There is no way a farmer can increase efficiency if he is exploit- ed. He pays so much for machinery, interest, parts, fertilizer and seed that he doesn’t have enough to maintain a decent standard of living. If you’ve lived on a farm and understood its workings (I don’t know if both apply to you), then you’ll know what the;farmer’s problems are. Your article sure made it sound like the farmer was at fault. (You’re not partial to big business, are you?) Your ideas about efficiency are ridiculous It’s like the bookstore charg- ing you a fortune for books, the government lending you money at high interest, the landlord soak- ing you for room and board and me telling you that you “are in a competitive field and those who cannot compete must leave.” (university). Put yourself in a farmer’s shoes and don’t walk where the ground is wet.

AVIARS SEMJANOVS math 2

An open letter to the university credit manager

An open letter to the university credit manager.

J .S . Philips Credit Manager University of Waterloo Dear sir: I am somewhat puzzled and of-

fended by the rather abrupt form letter which I received this morning concerning an alleged out- standing account of $63.35. I was under the impression that all my financial obligations to the university had been cleared up. I am, however, willing to remit the !$63.- 35 if the following problems can be explained to my satisfaction.

(1) For what do I owe $63.35? (2) Why, in spite of the conten-

tion in your recent form letter (enclosed) was I never informed of this debt?

(3) Several months ago I was informed by the business office that I owed the university $20.00; a sum which I paid in order to have my marks released. At this time I was led to believe that all my debts were clear. Now I am told that I owe another $63.35. Do you have two accounting depart- ments?

(4) Why are you using a yearold address when you were officially informed 8 months ago of a change of address? Especially when the Registrar’s office, the Business office, and the English department all use my new address.

(5) Why have I never received a T-4 form for the period of Jan.-

May 1969 during which I was em- ployed as a teaching assistant at u. of W.?

I still retain some hope that this awkward situation can be cleared up to everyone’s satisfaction, however. To ‘accomplish this, I make the following proposal: you have the courtesy to answer the five questions listed above, before referring the account to your collection agency; and for my part I will refrain from referring the matter of the missing T-4 form to the Department of National Rev- enue, to which, according to sec- tion 2173 of the Canadian Master Tax Guide, (enclosed for your Con- venience) you now owe $600.00 in penalty fines.

I trust I will hear from you soon so that we can clear this matter up as quickly as possible.

In order to prevent this letter falling into a computer and dis- appearing forever I have sent copies to people who I know exist in the flesh.

Yours truly, Doug Gaukroger

lnternationalizm another word for Americanization

. So nationalism disgusts Brian

Hendley. It must have been hell for him, growing up in the -U.S. with all that nationalism. No won- der he sought asylum in Canada. Since the canadinization campaign is aimed at curbing that disgusting nationalism from taking over Canada, I would expect to find Brian in ‘the vanguard of the movement.

But Brian is a true blue inter- nationalist (or anti-nationalist, or ‘something) who won’t touch any kind of nationalism, even one that just tries to protect itself from someone else’s nationalism.

The U.S. has an iron grip on its own culture and economy as well as a good share of everyone else’s. Now Americans want to chuck all that ugly nationalistic stuff that secured their own position and develop a nice internationalism.

Bullshit! It’s nationalistic imperialism like it’s always been and Canada is about to be the first \ modern nation to give up her independence through hard work and develop into a colony.

In this country, internationalism is just another word for American- ization, an extension of nationalistic american expansion, so when the Brian Hendleys talk of internationalism and ugly nationalism they’re talking about american imperialism and ugly Canadian independence.

There’s no such thing as true internationalism, educational or otherwise, between two countries who are not economically, politically and culturally independent of one another and on a near level of equality in these areas so that the smaller nation isn’t over- whelmed by the larger.

This hardly applies to Canada and the U.S. Canada’s whole history is a resistance to an american takeover by “continentalists” both in Canada and the U.S. Pro-. fessor Hendley was right on one score though. Nationalism makes us emotional-for a change.

And so Brian Hendley, you’re guilty of having your stars and stripes showing. Our Un-Canadian Activities Committee could get you for that.

DON LUFT arts 1

friday 75 may 1970 (I 1: !) 9 9

BOurassa gets by- with a-little -I . help from his - - _ .’ friends. . ,-. .’

UEBEC’S RECENT VENTURE into the realm of electoral politics pro-

vided some disappointments, yet rel- - atively few surprises.

The Liberal landslide in, the Quebec election may be explained largely in terms of a conglomeration of political and socio- economic factors.

‘The Liberals were regarded by many on the eve of the election as a safety valve , for the aspirations of many traditionally-

Z conservative voters, however the scat- tered support given to the inept and in- - cumbent government of the Union Nation-

, ale, as well as-the right wing Credi@stes. contributed substantially to. the complex- ity-of political loyalties which were mani- fested on the eve of the recent election. ’

The Parti Quebecois, under the leadership of Rene Levesque, had considerable right to be enraged as to the results of the- election .

The archaic nature of the Quebec el-

ectoral system did little’to emphasize the fact in terms of popular support, the Parti Qucbecois must be termed the official opposition.

As a result o.f the blatant inequities of the electoral map, the Liberals, under the leadership of Robert Bourassa, gained seventy-two seats in the provincial leg- islature with only forty-five per-cent of the popular vote while the Parti Quebecois, with almost one quarter of the popular vote, managed to capture only seven seats. Such instances of the futility of the Quebec electoral system were by no means irregular, however.

Approximately three-hundred thousand youthful voters were left off the voting

lists for various reasons-an error which cost the Parti Quebecois dearly in the long-run. -

, Many P.Q. supporters are seemingly unlikely as well, to forget instances of electoral irregularities strangely remin-

. .

iscent of the. Duplessis era: the stuffing of ballot boxes, wanton destruction of ballots and electoral lists, as well as the longestablished phenomenon of election- day coercion.

The Liberal victory in Quebec has been termed a victory for federalism by many narrow-minded federalists while at the same time, it has been termed a profound victory for the future economic aspirations of -Quebec by the English-speaking bourgeoisie of Montreal.

The removal of an undisclosed quantity of securities from Montreal to Toronto in armored trucks resembled a carefully- planned propaganda hype designed to il- icit mass hysteria on the part of the el- ectorate as to the eventual economic stability of the province. Such actions were, in fact, quite in line with the image con- veyed by Bourassa.

Provocations of, impending economic disaster if the P.Q. gained substantial support, as well as Bourassa’s Harvard and Oxford credentials, which were used

(effectively on the colonial mentality, were instrumental in conveying an at- mosphere of economic stability which the liberals sought to maintain.

The defeat of the P.Q. was not a victory for federalism, nor for a renewal in fidel- ity of the potentialities of the Quebec economy. It was however a defeat for the system of electoral politics in Quebec; i.e. a defeat for the parliamentary system as an effective means for radical social reform in Quebec society.

The immediate vanguard of the P.Q. represented a call for moderation-an attempt at bringing under a common ban- ner the extremist elements of Quebec society, such as the Front de Liberation

* ” Populaire and the Rassemblement pour I

L‘Independance Nationale. To the extent that the P.Q. failed to achieve its goals through the channels to which it had ac- cess, such a collective effort must be deemed a failure.

Quebec has thus embarked upon a po- tentially dangerous yet productive path toward radical social reform. The failure of radical elements to achieve their ends in a traditional political perspective will necessitate the adoption of extra-legal means to attain fundamental goals. Thus, violent street demonstrations will most likely be the order of the day in the immediate future.

In any case, the goals of the radical elements of Quebec society are the .goals of expediency and ultimacy in an increasingly colonial-minded province which has succeeded in oppressing the vast major-. ity of its citizens, not only culturally but economically.

In the context of electoral politics, the Parti Quebecois sought to be considered as an effective safety-valve for social - protest. Such a dream however, was as hollow and banal as the campaign of economic hysteria which was undertaken by the Liberals under their businessman- leader Robert ‘Bourassa.

Jacques Parizeau, the economic expert of the now seemingly defunct Parti Queb- ecois seemed to sum up . the genesis. of Quebec’s economic and social future rather well.

“There are too many reasons to be op- timistic in Quebec today. . . the Liberals won the election by’ inspiring fear in the people. But fear is a knife that can cut both ways.”

by Dane Charboneai C hey i-on staff

T HE ENVIRONMENT MAY WELL ‘. BE the gut issue that can unify a pol-

arized nation in the 1970’s, writes Time magazine. The Hearst Press sees it

. as a movement “that could unite- the generations.” And the * New York Times solemly predicts that ecology, “will replace Vietnam as the major issue with students”. *

: tablishment? Perhaps. But the organizers of the officially-sanctioned april 22 teach- in movement are doing their best to give life to the-media’s daydream about the co-

j optive potential of ecology. Thousands of. young people across the country have engaged in. a series of environmental ex- travaganzas, embellished to capture, the

’ excitement of the original Vietnam teach- ins, but structured to encourage the young to forsake the “less important issues” and enlist in a crusade to save the earth. ,

We think that any analogy between what happened around april 22 and the organization of the Vietnam teach-ins is obscene. We think that the environmental teach- in apparatus is. the first step. in a con game that will do ‘little more than abuse the environment even further. We do not think it will succeed.

The originators of the Vietnam teach- ins worked at great odds and against the lies and opposition of government, university administrations and the media. They raised their own money and had offices in student apartments or small store- fronts. “Earth Day” came to life in the offices of senator Gaylord Nelson, received blessings from Nixon’s <Department of

+ health, education and welfare, was fund-

ed by foundations, and has worked out of facilities leht by the Urban coalition. ,

Vietnam protestors had to create their own reading lists, fact sheets and white papers ; they had to work against the l‘ex- p&is&’ of southeast Asia scholars. The environmental teach-in comes pre-packaged ; a well-paid and well-staffed national office sends local organizers an official brochure which avoids mentioning the social and economic environment with which mother nature has to cope. Friends of the “earth (FOE) provides, through Ballantine books, a semi-official “Envir- onmental Handbook,” which insists that saving the environment “transcends the other issues” and that we should in non- partisan fashion “support a man from any political party if he is a true friend of the earth.”

Never mind if he’s a racist. Don’t worry about whether or not he supports amer-‘ ican imperialism. This spring the Nixon administration is busy undoing I5 years of struggle for school integration; the police continue to murder black people in .the streets; the american judicial system is disintegrating and, in the eyes of the state every radical has become a conspirator; the war machine in Washington has made clear its intention to stay in Vietnam indefinitely and to spread its war to Laos. All this-and the teach-in organizers want to banish everything but environment to the back pages of our minds. They must be blind, or perverse, or both.

How can anyone in this dark spring- time believe kind words - about environment or anything ‘else - from the men in

power? Once we might have been able to believe that because a president had em- braced the civil rights issue, apartheid in the deep south was dead. But such illus- ions can hardly be sustained any longer. The open housing act, the chief legislative victory of those years, finds use this season only for its “H. Rap Brown Amend- ment” - the interstate travel ban on which the justice department hung the Chicago 7.

Haven’t we learned after a decade of

Lyndon Johnson promised that “we shall overcome. ” Now Richard Nixon promises to clean up America. Even TV’s “Laugh-In’: knows the punch-line: “lf Nixon’s war on pollution is as successful as Johnson’s war on poverty, we’re going to ‘have an awful lot of dirty people around. ”

social struggle that major problems like Vietnam, race, poverty - now environ-

main.

ment - can’t be packaged separately, each protected from contamination ‘by “other issues”? Even the Kerner commission

realized that white racism was systemat- ic, structural and linked to economic and social institutions. Even the most deter- - mined skeptic has now been shown by. the Nixon administration that the Vietnam

_ war was no honest mistake, but the result of a long history of american expansion into Asia and a long-term’ policy of sub-\ _ jetting poor nations to the imperatives of american investors. To understand why Washington has persisted, in its genocidal war in Indo-China, don’t look at the pol- iticians who come and go; look at the structures of power and interest ‘that re-

In which Friends of the Earth

are no .friends from Ramp&, april 70 of man.

10 10 the Chevron

P hilonious P. Marter, protector of the public good and all square edged or- ator, silver tongued and cut glass face, delivers to the council the facts he found in mission. Sliced thin the truths of h,is master, lined with foam rub-

ber, marked fragile and “heavy stuff”, Marter’s demi-document falls to split on

the mace of justice. A cry rings singing “Helpless, Helpless, Helpless”... and laughter rings the song of actors adeptly adlibing alternate adaged axioms, eh!

Manny‘Flippant, Jew in exile and perpetuator of mother’s gentle gentile gut germination, dies of drowning’. I remember him, I do. I do remember him.

Philonious P. Marter picks up the split pages, now lying shaped in the line of Manny Flippant’s late forehead, stops in memory of the Cape Cod afternoon which removed Manny, licks his fingers and makes the sign of the cross on the minister’s stomach. The council breaths in unison (divided according to party lines. . . the left inhales, the right exhales, the right exiles, the left defiles, the left defumes, the right exhumes) and heads bow in widespread fatigue. M;l,nny vwas a tiring lad.

Philonious P. Marter, notes now cut paired side by each, split (as it were and is) by council’s counsel and the mace, drops preparation in favour of the sav-

our of mind images and the challenge of expression. Rolling up his shirt sleeves he begins, “we mu$t destroy every human with poor eyesight!”

And in the morning, the headlines read, “Philonious P. Marter Speaks Off

Cuff At Spontaneous Flippant Memorial! * * *

“That wasn’t a very happy ending!” “No”

“Well l want a happy ending, see, and I’m the cat who finances Ihis paper!”

The accompaning article went on io des&ibe the brilliant use of the language . s

in Marter’s oration, and concluded with the announcement of Marter’s appoint- ment to the offices of Information Canada in one capacity or another.

* * * “Is that happy enough for you?” “It’s okay. It has potential.”

by Bruce Steele COPYRIGHT 7970

member: Canadian university press (CUP) and underground press syndicate (UPS): subscrib- er: liberation news service (LNS) and chevron international news service (GINS): published fifty- two times a year (1970-71) on tuesdays and fridays by the publications board of the federation of students, incorporated, university of Waterloo. Content is the responsibility of the chevron staff, independent of the federation and the university administration; offices in the people’s campus center; phone (519) 578-7070 or university local 3443; telex 0295-748; summer circula- tion 8,500; Alex Smith, editor. Here we are for the first issue of volume 11, eager to leave the cheesecake and the bulletin boa’rd histrionics to the Gazette, which is doing a great job looking like the Punkeydoodle Corners After- noon Tea And Petit-Fours Society Almanac And Social Calendar? but ah, that’s institutionalized PR journalims for you.. . oh well,back to the business at hand in which we make note of the fact that one-time jockcum-society editor w. ross taylor, B.A. is out of it out west for a few weeks, latter-day phenomenologist Cyril levitt has just returned from david black’s farm in Ottawa; marie and trudie are driving out west next week; and overheard at the Waterloo copshop on Wednesday: “I don’t know what the hell he’s trying to do, We don’t tell him how to run the fire department; why should he be concerned with the police department,” Or words to that effect. m .hmmmmm. And what about the staff? There was, needles to say, a pointed lack of bodies for this paper, although everything seemed to go reasonably well, However, if anyone wants to participate in the fun, by all means come to the chevron office and have a chat with us; unless a few more people do, there won’t be a paper for very long, And a special note, before we announce the celebrity winners this week, to suggest that fred’spizza is highly recommended at 7444446. Following than, are la creme de la creme for 11 :I, may 15 (f), 1970:

news: r’obert epp features: rats

entertainment: ross bell

with a little help from our friends gary robins, p,>il elsworthy, Steve izma, dane charboneau, Scott arnold, eleanor peavoy, larry Caesar and stan simister. And where are you ken toe, john nelson and persimmia dalnleish?

NEBEtSPALTER, Switzerland

friday 15 may 1970 (11: 1) 11 11

Lucia Perry: I was there. I was mainly curious. I heard about the rally and I wanted to find out what was going on, because like helicopters had been buzzing in my dorm all night, and everywhere you went there were National Guard. I wasn’t particularly interested in throwing any rocks or anything like that. But I was very much against what he (President Richard Nixon) did in Cambodia and I was’hoping the rally would produce something, you know, really true.

_ Anyway, I soon realized that maybe this wasn’t, you know, just a rally. It may sound corny, but I promised my mother that I wouldn’t get involved. S.o I thought, well ‘I better get home instead of getting stuck in it. And then I was walking past and there was a,hilf with trees on it. And there was a kid standing in the trees with his legs spread apart and he threw a rock at one of the Guardsmen. And the guy was so mad-he had a mask on, but you could tell from the way he acted, he was infuriated-that he shot at this boy.‘ And missed the boy- . and hit a tree. It nearly hit it.

Q. This was with what? Lucia: With a rifle. With a

real bullet. Cause I saw the ’ bullet when it ricocheted off

the tree. There was an entrance on the other side of the building, and I went out and was standing on the veranda when the shooting took place. So I saw everything. I saw the men firing, and I saw the kids fall, and I looked out at the crowd and there were people carrying, you know, people with blood all over them down the hill, and I just couldn’t believe it. I’ve never seen people so mad and so horrified.

Ellen Glass: There was nobody on campus in the morning. It was a relatively quiet campus. And then what they did was they let the kids get into a huge group. And the kids were really unenthusiastic anyway, because they couldn’t even keep up a chant more than a couple of seconds. You know, they would have gotten hungry and something would have happened, and they would have all left, if the Guard had stayed where they were. In- stead, they made this big play, started throwing tear gas, and the movement of the crowd was mostly out of fear.

Q. Has all this shaken your sense of your future?

Jeff: I’ll have to ramble ‘on here a second. Sunday night they changed the curfew from 1 to 11 and a friend of my younger brother-a very average Kent student-got arrested at 10 after 11. They handcuffed him‘ and took his money and they held a .45 to his head, cocked it and said, “If you move one inch we’re going to kill you.” Then they took him to jail, mugged him, printed him and everything, took his shoelaces and his belts and told him he had no rights under martial law. Then with about 15 other kids they shoved him in a seven- by-seven cell and left him there for 28 hours. Now this is a typical, average American kid. He’s no rebel. He!s in the reserves the whole lot. And he an’d his friends are bringing guns back to school because they said if a guards- man comes after them, they’ll kill him. And I’m not talking about a Jerry Rubin. I’m not talking about a nut. I’m talking about a kid who’s afraid for his own life. These are-average kids but they are so mad.

Q. Now relate that to the question.

Jeff: Okay. I still believe in working through the system and I still believe that the only way you can do something is through the law. And I personally feel that if we can show what I am sure is true, that a commander of the National Guard gave that order to fire, then that guy should be prosecuted and can be prosecuted under the law. And I will personally push to the fullest extent to see that he is prosecuted.

Q. What if you felt it was * being whitewashed?

Jeff: They aren’t going to be able to whitewash this. The kids will never stop until they settle this. ’

rats

Voices: I don’t think that. Sure they will.

Lucia: My feeling is that authority will do anything it can to cover up/its mistakes. Authority just doesn’t care. They really don ‘t .

Ron : Like in the Calley case, they find some second lieu- tenant and blame him. Well, that’s what’s going to happen here. They’ll get some buck sergeant or some one, two or three people and hang them for the whole rap.

Q. What makes you think that?

Tom: It’s the way the political system works. What choices did we have in the Democratic primary in Ohio? A spaceman and a million- aire.

Ellen: I think that a basic problem with this country is that it’s a world power and sees itself as a policeman of the world. And I think this country has to be reduced to something other than a world power.

Q. President Nixon said he would rather be a one-term President than see this country become a second-rate power.

Tom: We shouldn’t care whether our flag flies from the highest pole at the-united Nations.

Q. What’s the solution? Wayne: If we made our sys-

tem work here, we wouldn’t have to go around forcing it down other people’s throats because they’d steal it, they’d just take it away from us.

Q. President Nixon j also talked about anarchy in the universities. Is that a real menace?

Michael: I think that’s a reaction to the coming police state. If kids are arming themselves with helmets and training in street fighting, it’s a reaction to the frustration they feel in a police state.

Q. Then what can you do about Cambodia?

Lucia: I really am dead set against violence. That’s a cop-out. But it’s the only way to get the- Government’s attention. What you’re doing is drawing their attention to you by using the same methods they use. I really am against that. It’s horrible that the only way you can get people to listen is to have four kids killed. There -was no big blow- up over Cambodia until four kids were killed. You could have all the peace marches that were peaceful and quiet and everyone would pat you on the back and say, “Good little kids. You keep it quiet. Good for you.” But .nobody would do anything.

Q. I’m curious as to whether what has happened generally in the country and specifically at Kent State has shaken up your sense of your own personal future? Do you have a sense of doom?

Jeff Tetreault: I’m not particularly worried about what I’ll be able to do I think I’m strong in my own self. I’ve made one decision already. I’m planning to go to Canada, British Columbia, and go to school there and then try to get into agriculture or botany of some kind.

Tom Difloure: I’ve seen other demonstrations where people were hurt but I’ve never seen anyone killed before. And you walk around, you know, seeing bits’ and pieces of people’s skin laying on the pavement and the blood and all that. But I made up my mind a long time ago that I’m leaving.

Q. One last question. Will ‘it happen again? Was this an aberration or the start of a trend?

Tom Dilfoure: The Go- vernor of Kentucky ordered a curfew on the school down there. He told the troops to use live ammo and bayonets. Now that’s kindof foolish following what happened at Kent. But that’s what he told them. And you know they’ve got the Guard at Ohio State Univer- sity and they’ve got the Guard at the University of Maryland and they’ve got the Guard at Illinois and Wisconsin.

Michael: You can’t re-educate all the National Guards- men onto campuses. And unless you have a frontal lobo- tomy on Nixon, you’re not going to re-educate him. But until you do those things it’s bound to happen.

e 12 the Chevron

1970-71_v11,n01_Chevron

Documents

Transcript of 1970-71_v11,n01_Chevron