1967 Freeway Surveillance Study Southeast Freeway …€¦ · SOUTHEAST FREEWAY-KANSAS CITY,...
Transcript of 1967 Freeway Surveillance Study Southeast Freeway …€¦ · SOUTHEAST FREEWAY-KANSAS CITY,...
2 3
VV
ERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM 68 10 Y REPORT - • •
1967 FREEWAY SURVEI LLANCE STUDY SOUTHEAST FREEWAY/ KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.
MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS
-. . .-. . ..
TE 5'01~
n j 11 •
() CJ . b'j-Io
1967 FREEWAY SURVEILLANCE STUDIES ,
SOUTHEAST FREEWAY-KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
Prepared by
MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Division of Highway Planning
October, 1968
in cooperation with
UuS. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Bureau of Public Roads
The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the Bureau of Public Roads.
•
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction 1
Study Area 1
Traffic Volumes . 4
Densities . . 7
Summary . 18
ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
l-a Southeast Freeway (1-70) Kansas City, Missouri 2
l-b Southeast Freeway (1-70) Kansas City, Missouri 3
2-a Average October Weekday Traffic Volume 5
2-b Average October Weekday Traffic Volume '6
3-a Average October Peak Hour Traffic Volume '.8
3-b Average October Peak Hour Traffic Volume 9
4 Speed Vs. Density at Selected Locations . 10
5 Typical Urban Freeway Operation Under Various Traffic Density Levels . 12
6-a Traffic Density Contours and Levels of Service During the Morning Peak Period on the Westbound Lanes . 13
6-b Traffic Density Contours and Levels of Service During The Morning Peak Period on the Westbound Lanes. . 14
~-a Traffic Density Contours and Levels of Service During The Afternoon Peak Per iod on the Eastbound Lanes . 15
7-b Traffic Densi ty Contours and Levels of Service During The Afternoon Peak Per iod on the Eastbound Lanes . 16
Introduction
Since the movement of traffic is the purpose of freeways,
maintenance of satisfactory operating conditions is as important
as maintenance of the physical structure.
This report is based on freeway congestion studies conducted
in the summer of 1967 as part ot a continuous surveillance of
traffic operations on Missouri freeways. Should the need develop,
the studies help provide information necessary for the planning
of control systems or measures designed to improve traffic flow.
The studies also point out areas where operations have reached
a critical level.
This report is intended to provide an inventory of present
operating conditions on the Southeast Freeway in Kansas city,
rather than a detailed analysis of operations at any location.
Study Area
The name, Southeast Freeway, applies to a portion of Inter
s t ate Rout e 70 in Kansas City running from the 14th Street Inter
change eastward.
The area under study begins at Tenth Street, which is part
of 1-70 designated as the North Midtown Freeway, and continues
east to Noland Road in Independence.
The geometrics of the study section are shown in figures
l-a and l-b. The Sketch at the top of each page has been d~storted
slightly so that each interchange corresponds with its correct
milepost on the line diagrams. This is the same base sketch used
on the density charts in this study. The mileage begins at the
s t a t e line as 0.0. The number of through lanes varies from two
-1-
~ (f)
:I: r-o
2.00
lood
~ gOOr ~ III -' III 800
700
..,.: (f)
:I: r-
t;; ~
:I: Z r--!
'of)< /'o~~ · OJ"V ". <o .~
~.
roro ". X
~ (f)
o ~ ~
w > Z < <
~ r- :::> u Q: w r-Q.. I z (f)
~ 0 z Q: ~
O~ Q.. Z
0< w Q: CD CD
\ r-Z
~\ :::> . Q: a CD ~ _ CD
~ (f)
u.i ci ~ Q: ~ r<l (f)
N Z
~ 0
~ <t It: vi (J
=i <
~ (f)
:I: r-<Xl
...,
MILES
VERTICAL PROFILE
0° roO cP ~. ~ . D< ' -------.! /
NUMBER OF LANES (1-70 THROUGH LANES ONLY)
WESTBOUND
3 2 4 3------------------------4
EASTBOUND
3 I 2~3 I 4 3--------------------------------------~
SPEED LIMITS
(MPH)
~----------------------------------55 55----------------------------------~--~
FIGURE I-a. SOUTHEAST FREEWAY 0-70) KANSAS CITY, ' MISSOURI.
7.40
1000
~ 900 ~ ~ '" oJ
'" 800
700
~ ~ LL. I-
a: L.U IVl L.U :I: U Z cr ~
If) r<'l <:I
LL.
~ ::> u L.U
8 a:
MILES
VERTICAL PROFILE
NUMBER OF LANES
WESTBOUND
~ vi ::i
a ...J
L.U (!) a a: ci
~ fI)
o~
(1-70 THROUGH LANES ONLY)
Olb ~ .
/
\ \
a cr o a: o ~ d z
3 l------------------------------------------------------------~
EASTBOUND
3 Z----------------------------------------------------~
SPEED LIMITS
(MPH)
t-------55 (70 UNTIL OCTOBER 1967) +-------------------------------------70----------------------------------------------------------~
FIGURE I-b. SOUTHEAST FREEWAY (1-70) KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.
to four lanes as indicated in figure 1.
Grades over 3% are indicated on the profile sketch. Speed
limits are shown as they existed January 1, 1968.
Traffic Volumes
The traffic counts used in this study were made during October
1967. For use in this study a complete inventory of r.amp traffic
was taken.
Counts from the permanent traffic counter located just west
of Van Brunt Avenue indicate that the October average traffic
should be within approximately two percent of the annual average
traffic, therefore no attempt was made to factor this traffic into
an annual average. All traffic figures, both daily and peak hour,
are average weekday traffic.
Through lane volumes were obtained by taking the volume from
the permanent counter, just west of Van Brunt Avenue, and adding
or subtracting ramp volumes. This will produce through lane vol
umes which should be within the same accuracy range that counting
would provide, and has the advantage of providing balanced volumes.
Average October weekday volumes are shown in Figure 2. As
expected the lowest volumes occur on the east end with increase~
along the way to a maximum volume just east of the 14th Street
Interchange. At this location the two-way weekday volume appears
to exceed 100,000 vehicles.
Volumes taken at the Van Brunt count station indicate an
annual increase ranging from 12 to 52 percent each year since
that section of freeway opened. The October volume (two-way)
at this location in 1963 was 26,780; in 1968, this location carried
a volume of 64 , 920. Much of this increase is due to opening
-4-
'15
a~£2
'15
H
1S
I
/ /
'15
H
1"
15
H
10
1
avo~
INv~n~l-
N0
1N
38
3flN
3I\V
lJ3dSO~d
03
SV
d
3H
.l lSOO~l
NOSI~~VH -:...-;..-
?>NVH~3.lNI
'15
0 10
I'-<
;t r<
)
0 <;t
r<)
10
~
'01\18 1N~8
NV
I\
15
H
1 L2
~
:; =:> .....l 0 >-U
H
~ ~
<t
cc E-<
>-< <
t C
l ~ ~ ~
::= cc ~
CO 0 E-< U
0 ~
C-' <
t ex:; ~
>-<t til
N
~
ex:; =:> C-' H
~
29540 - -31620
\ \
>-= ~ II.. I-
0:: W lV) w 5 z ~
~ vi ::;
32200
329/0
FIGURE 2-b. AVERAGE OCTOBER WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUME.
AVERAGE OCT. WEEKDAY VOLUME 1967
7210
3880 1154
ci ~ III
~ ~ ~
I f (NOT OPEN)
In If) .,. I
\8940
24540
2/870
\42."30
42.\0
W
811.. -II.. 0::0
I::;)
~u as
o ~ 0::
Q z c(
~
\82."30
91O~ \ lNO coUNts ,"~E"l :: r ~ 7/60
1?aZr ."~~
sections of the freeway rather than to growth.
The volumes shown in figure 3 are for the average peak hour
occuring on the ramps. This figure provides an approximate of
peak hour volumes with balanced flow. The actual peak volume at
any specific location may be slightly higher than shown.
The maximum P.M . peak hour volume (E.B. lanes) occurs just
west of the Paseo off-ramp. At this location the freeway is
four lanes, with an additional lane serving as an acceleration
deceleration ramp.
The maximum volume during the A.M. peak hour (W.B. lanes)
occurs between the Paseo and Brooklyn. The volume in either
direction decreases with movement eastward along the freeway.
Densities
The use of traffic density expressed in terms of vehicles
per lane per mile has been established as a means of measuring
over-all operating conditions on freeways. Density, for this
study, was determined by counting the number of vehicles on each
section of road as they appeared on aerial photographs. In order
to use density as a measure of operation, it is necessary to
relat e it to some recognizable quantity, such as speed, which was
used in this case.
Speed and volume measurements were made at various locations
on the three freeways being studied. These measurements were
then used to compute the spot density at these locations. Density
vs. speed charts were plotted and a "least squares fit" was made
for each location as shown in figure 4. Data gathered from all the
locations were used to develop an equation for relating speed and
density (line No.7 on figure 4). This equation has a standard
-7-
~ I/')
\ I .... Q
\ ~ I/')
I .... --@
~ I/')
~ I
ILl ~ Z I ILl 0 .... ....
~ I/')
0::
.... , \ 0:: .... ~ Cl(l) I/') ... r.
'240 -;/ 5000 d
(4840) (~ > <
~
~ "V) I/')
I .... ,... N
FIGURE 3-a. AVERAGE OCTOBER PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME.
AVERAGE PEAK HOUR VOLUME OCT., 1967
ILl :::> z ILl
~ z ~ 5 If III
xxx AM WB 6:45-7:45 (XXX)PM EB 4: 15- 5: 15
\ _ "20 5810
(5090)
~ ~ \ ILl :::> z ILl
~ .... U
~ I/')
0 0:: Cl.
~ z ILl
~ z ~ x: ~ -,
\Ic-vr \ ~'\. ""'- /'"
_\()"\~
z (600)'-' Cl ~ :::> 0:: 0 .... Cl 10 zo:: ~ Z ILl III
, ,.
\ ~ 260
- " ':J-
~ ~WU-.... Z
~ci III~
.n'); ZIIl
~
~ I/')
I .... CD -
t;; 0 0:: r<) N
0 <t-
vi :j
4200
(4360)
\ \
~ ~ .... ~
a:: w ~ (/) w is z ~
4170
(4430)
0 v vi :j
0
d
AVERAGE PEAK HOUR VOLUME OCT., 1967
ci ~ m
~ a:: w ::> .J m
xxx AM WB 6:45-7:45 (XXX)PM EB 4: 15-5: 15
2/70 I I
(NOT OPEN)
10 pt)
V I
25/0
(25/0)
\52.0
tl \40)
(1050)
FIGURE 3- b. AVERAGE OCTOBER PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME.
w 8 .... ii:~
:::> ~u iii
(860)
~ o a:: o z 4(
~
t\9\0)
~NO coUN1S i,,~EN)
~NO CO
:l: Cl. ~
I o w w Cl. (f)
J;'Tr.rnH' A
80-.------~------_r------~------,_------~------._------._----~r_----_,------~
70 -+- f"-;:=:;:
60 ......... L ~,", I
50 ~ .... ~ .. ~
40 1'...... ...... .. ",".?k
30
20
10
o o
CD 1-70 S.L., EB. AM, W. OF BEG. OF REV. LNS . 7-26-67
® 1-70 S.L., WB. PM, AT COLLEGE AVE . PED. O'PASS GRADE+5%
7-31- 67
® US 40 S.L.,WB. PM, AT MC KINLEY DR . PED. O'PASS GRADE=O% 8-2-67
@ US 40 S.L.,EB. AM, AT MC KINLEY DR. PED. O'PASS GRADE=O%
8-3-67
® 1-70 K.C., EB. PM, AT LISTER AVE . GRADE+ 0.4%
8-16-67
® 1-70 K.C.,WB. AM, AT LISTER AVE . GRADE+O.4%
8-23-67 o AVERAGE ALL LOCATIONS ---- ----
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 DENSITY-VEHICLES/ LANE/MILE
<:;:DJ;'J;'n \/<:;: nJ;'I\] QT'T'V CI:'l r.roTr.n 'f1.ro.l "....Tr'\~ Tr.
" 80 90 100
error of 4.4 m.p.h. Using this equation, the error should be less
than that amount (4.4 m.p.h.) two-thirds of the time. Densities
were calculated which correspond to the speeds associated with
levels of service as defined by the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual.
At each location where data were collected, the speed limit
was 55 m.p.h. Therefore, it was unlikely that many speeds above
55 m.p.h. would have been recorded, regardless of the density.
Because of this, the speed-density relationship above 55 m.p.h. 1S
considered unreliable, and the levels of service above level
C(50-55 m.p.h.) cannot be distinguished.
Figure 5 was prepared to give the reader an idea of how
the various densities look from the air. The observer will note
that the cars do not appear as closely spaced as one would think.
This is due to the fact that most people are accust-omed to obser
ving traffic at ground level where the gap between car s tends to
disappear.
In figures 6 and 7 the densities are presented as contours
on a time-distance chart . To reflect the equivalent level of
service, the density cont ours have been color coded. with the
use of color the density charts are virtually self-explanatory.
Red indicat es the lowest level of service (level F), while green
indicates the best level that could be determined (level C or
better) .
It should be remembered that these charts represent oper
ation on only one day, and while no unusual incidents were
detected on t hat day , daily variations in operating conditions
do occur.
The westbound lanes, shown in figure 6, appear to have the
heaviest congestion in the area between Twenty-seventh Street and
-11-
33 VEH.ILN.IM/., (LEVEL C) 47 VEH. ILN. IM/. , (LEVEL D)
59 VEH.ILN.IM/., (LEVEL E) 75 VEH . ILN./M/., (LEVEL F)
FIGURE 5. TYPICAL URBAN FREEWAY OPERATING UNDER VARIOUS TRAFFIC DENSITY LEVET.S .
~ <r
w ~ I--
I--(j)
I I--
S?
8
I-
~~ (j)
0 0 a: I-
\
P ~ (j)
I I--
f-' I~ I--<:t
0 W (j)
ct w I
"~ Z
~ 1 \
\ :.::w 0> o <r a: CD
f-' (j)
W ci ~ a: f-' r0 (j)
Z W
<r > ~
<r N Z
I 0 r- (j)
:J a: I--
I--
I-- (j) u w
r-- :.:: N U
<r -,
I I CL
Z I--(j)
0 CD 0
I--a: z CL
w CD
LEGEND LEVELS OF SERVICE SPEED RANGE (MPH)
LEVEL C OR BETTER 50 OR GREATER I LEVEL D 40 TO 50 I LEVEL E 30 TO 40 I .,_. ,'- ·1 LEVEL F LESS THAN 30 I DENSITY CONTOURS VEHICLES LANE MILE -20-
MILES
FIGURE 6 -a. TRAFFIC DENSITY CONTOURS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE DURING THE MORNING PEAK PERIOD ON THE WESTBOUND LANES.
I--Z :J ' a: 0 CD ~ Z CD <r >
/7\ 0 <:t vi :j
\. \
~ <[
w ~ I-
>= ~ ~ I-
0: W lV)
W z: u z -r ~
~ ~
~ ::> u w 8 ~
LEGEND LEVELS OF SERVICE SPEED RANGE (MPH)
LEVEL C OR lETTER 50 OR GREATER LEVEL 0 40 TO 50 LEVEL E 30 TO 40 LEVEL F LESS T~N 30 DENSITY CONTOURS VEHICLU{ LANE/MILE -20-
~ u; ::i
w g a: g
i6
FIGURE 6- b . TRAFFIC DENSITY CONTOURS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE DURING THE MORNING PEAK PERIOD ON THE WESTBOUND LANES.
\ \
o -r o a:: 1:1
f ;
~! ~-
t-' (j')
I t-O
r: (j')
I t-
l(/)
o o a: I-
o w (/)
~ W I t-
EAST BOUND TRAFFIC
w > Z <l <l
~ t- ::> u a: w t-CL I
z (j')
~ 0 Z a: 0
:><:W CL t-O> Z o <l W a: CD
CD
.....: (j')
I t-CO
LEGEND LEVELS OF SERVICE SPEED RANGE (MPH)
LEVEL C OR BETTER LEVEL D LEVEL E LEVEL F DENSITY CONTOURS
Vi ci a: r<l N
OC:~
50 OR GREATER 40 TO 50 ~ 30 TO 40 ' C ~":J
LESS THAN 30 VEHICLE~ LANE; MILE -20-
u.i f-' ~ (j')
Z I ~
0 (j')
"-N
:><: U <l -,
FIGURE 7-a. TRAFFIC DENSITY CONTOURS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE CURING THE AFTERNOON PEAK PERIOD ON THE EASTBOUNC LANES ~
tZ ::> . a: 0 CD ~ Z CD
;;
o <t uj
:::i
\ ~
\
\ \
5:4
5:15
5:00
~l f-_
4:45
4: 15
~ ~ LL. f-
a: w fUl W :I: U Z « ~
LL. LL.
~ ::::l U
w :5 a: w :3 (Xl
LEVELS OF SERVICE LEVEL C OR BETTER LEVEL. D LEVEL E LEVEL F DENSITY CONTOURS
LEGEND SPEED RANGE (MPH)
50 OR GREATER 40 TO 50 30 TO 40
LESS THAN 30 VEHICLES/LANE/MILE -20-
MILES
o o
c )
20 o
o <t vi :i
w (,!) o ii: ci
~ (Xl
cZO~
C~:J
FIGURE 7-b. TRAFFIC DENSITY CONTOURS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE DURING THE AFTERNOON PEAK PERIOD ON THE EASTBOUND LANES.
EAST BOUND TRAFFIC
10
o « o a: o z « d z
the Blue Ridge Cutoff. Operation at or below level D (yellow)
occurs from the Blue Ridge Cutoff to the Fourteenth Street inter
change. This could be considered an area of impending congestion
which could drop to one of the lower levels on any given day.
In some cases, the density figures, which are an average
for all through lanes, are not completely indicative of operations
at a particular location. This occurs on the Southeast Freeway
where lanes are dropped or split into directional lanes at inter-
changes. In some cases there is an uneven lane distribution or
division of flow at these locations. In the westbound lanes this
occurs in the area between The Paseo and tIle Fourteenth Street
interchange. This area shows level C and D operation for the
four lanes of traffic. Actually the two-shoulder lanes, which
carry 1-70 traffic north, are operating under lower levels during
much of the peak hour. The two median lanes, which join 1-35
west, operate at level C or better.
Density contours for the eastbound lanes (P.M. peak period)
are shown in figure 7. The area of operation at level D or worse
in the eastbound lanes extends from the west end of the study
section to the Blue Ridge Cutoff. This is roughly the same area
as in the westbound lanes.
The two separate periods of heavy congestion in the area
just south (east) of Tenth Street have been observed during
previous studies. Th~s area is another case in which the average
density does not reflect the unequal split in volume. At this
location most of the traffic (2690 out of 3210 peak hour vehicles)
uses the two median lanes which carry 1-70 east. The densities ln
these two lanes are somewhat higher than indicated. This also
occurs in the area east of Prospect Avenue where traffic anticipating
-17-
the loss of the fourth (median) lane crowds into the three out
side lanes.
The congestion does not appear to be as heavy as that found
in the westbound lanes, although the sections operating at level F
are scattered over a wide area. The heaviest congestion appears
to be between 10th Street and Brooklyn Avenue.
If t he density studies conducted during the summer of 1968
indicate heavy congestion in the same areas as those in figures
6 and 7, confirming the findings of this study, more detailed
studies a t these locations may be necessary .
Summary
with the regular completion and opening of sections of
freeways in the Kansas City area, traffic volumes on the Southeast
Freeway have increased at a rapid rate . The avertlge two-way
October weekday traffic volume exceeds 100,000 vehicles at the
peak location .
The lowest levels of service during the A. M. peak period
occur on the eastbound lane between Blue Ridge Cutoff and 27th
s treet.
During the P.M . peak period the portion of the eastbound
lanes west of Brooklyn appear to experience the heaviest congestion.
The area between Manchester Freeway and 1-435 appear to be congested,
though less seriously .
Since the density study represents operation on only one
day the dat.a gathered during the summer of 1968 must be analyzed
before the exact extend of the congestion can be determined.
-18-
1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllli/~/~lllf~lilllllllllllllll RD0016307