17022011

59
National Symposium : Frontiers in Biotechnology 17 th Feb 2011 Biotechnology Department, PU, Chandigarh Quest of DNA signature of species of animal, plant & microbes : Can we have a PIN code? Dinesh Kumar, B.Sc. Hons Zoo(BHU), M.Sc. Biotechnology(BHU), Ph.D. Biotechnology (BHU), PDF(USA) Senior Scientist(Animal Biotechnology) National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, INDIA Email: [email protected], [email protected]

description

Quest of DNA signature of species of animal, plant & microbes :Can we have a PIN code?Invited talk- National symposium - Punjab University Chandigarh, 17th Feb 2011, Biotechnology department

Transcript of 17022011

Page 1: 17022011

National Symposium : Frontiers in Biotechnology 17th Feb 2011Biotechnology Department, PU, Chandigarh

Quest of DNA signature of species of animal, plant & microbes :Can we have a PIN code?

Dinesh Kumar, B.Sc. Hons Zoo(BHU), M.Sc. Biotechnology(BHU), Ph.D. Biotechnology (BHU), PDF(USA)

Senior Scientist(Animal Biotechnology)

National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, INDIA

Email: [email protected], [email protected]

Page 2: 17022011

Genome, some thing identifiable

My single cell, 92 DNA molecule, maternal 46, paternal 46

A part of molecule is unique or combination of these molecule is unique

Signature in form of DNA marker- SNP or STR

How to tap these signature in genome?

Need bioinformatics tools

Case studies

Domestic Animals , Fish, Microbes, Plant

STR allele-private alleles or private frequencies

SNP- plus and minus assay

Software tools-SNP data and STR data

DNA signature- Quest

04/12/23 2Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 3: 17022011

How DNA signature is made for each species?

The number of nucleic acid or amino acid differences between two organisms is proportional to the time since

they diverged from a common ancestor.

TIME

MOLECULAR

DIFFERENCES

1 AAGGCTA

2 AAGGGTA

3 AAGGATG

Example Rate of Evolution = 1bp per 100 years

1 2 3

100years

200 years

Page 4: 17022011

Which marker for which purpose?

How long ago did organism A and organism B last have a common ancestor?

Molecular clock and DNA signature !!!Very recently - RAPDs/VNTRs/Microsatellites/

resistance genes

10,000s - 100,000s yrs - RNA- ITS, various protein- coding genes

100,000s - 1,000,000s yrs - ssu rRNA, HSPs,

04/12/23 4Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 5: 17022011

DNA barcoding of species

cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) potential 'barcode'.

04/12/23 5Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 6: 17022011

Origin of species bar code

Carl Woese used sequence differences in ribosomal RNA (rRNA) to discover archaea, which in turn led to the redrawing of the evolutionary tree, and molecular markers (e.g., allozymes, rDNA, and mtDNAvage ) have been successfully used in molecular systematics for decades.

In 2003, Paul D.N. Hebert from the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, proposed the compilation of a public library of DNA barcodes that would be linked to named specimens.

04/12/23 6Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 7: 17022011

Identification of birds by species bar code

Hebert and co-workers sequenced DNA barcodes of 260 of the 667 bird species that breed in North America (Hebert et al. 2004).

04/12/23 7Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 8: 17022011

Identifying flowering plants by species DNA bar code

Kress et al. (2005) -COI sequence- not appropriate for most species of plants slower rate of cytochrome c oxidase I gene evolution in higher plants than in animals”.

A series of experiments was then conducted to find a more suitable region of the genome for use in the DNA barcoding of flowering plants.

nuclear internal transcribed spacer region and the plastid trnH-psbA intergenic spacer as a potential DNA barcode for flowering plants. Some reports supports MatK

DNA barcoding, no 'master key' may be a 'master keyring', with different kingdoms of life requiring different keys.

04/12/23 8Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 9: 17022011

Microbial species signature

Ribotyping -rRNA database-most used eg 16srDNA Designing of primer for gene sequencing. Eg HKG,Topoiso II,

Designing of probes for identifications-Eg.real time, microarray

Meta genome analysis- gene prediction Chip based pyrosequencing and simulation In silico development of RFLP test for close species

differentiation(our experiences) MPIDB- functional identification Miniprimer PCR-a new lens to view microbial world

04/12/23 9Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 10: 17022011

rRNA genes - the ideal markers for microbial identification

Small subunit - highest order differences (domains) Large subunit - medium order differences ITS - low order differences (species/strains?)

Small Sub-Unit rRNA (16S) ubiquitous 1.6 - 2.0kb good molecular chronometer. some areas conserved (for priming/alignment) some areas variable (for resolving differences)

04/12/23 10Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 11: 17022011

•Naked Eye: Colony - shape, colour.•Microscopy: Cell - shape, colour, size•Biochemistry:•Molecular Level: Role of bioinformatics

Plant pathogen signature

04/12/23 11Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 12: 17022011

Can we use microsatellite in Fungi?

04/12/23 12Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 13: 17022011

How fungal microsatellite data gives signature

04/12/23 13Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 14: 17022011

Why we need molecular & bioinformatics tool?

Case study of Ug99-signature search

Stem rust never sleeps- Norman E. Borlaug , 26th April, 2008, New York Times

04/12/23 14Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 15: 17022011

Can we have DNA based signatures of Ug99?

National Debate! Global meet at Delhi, Oct, 2008Action plan?

04/12/23 15Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 16: 17022011

A case study updates-

How to identify Ug99?

Puccinia graminis tritici Ug99DNA signature is the only answer !DNA signature of Fungi

– Private alleles of STR(rare)– STR allele frequency signatures– SNP based signatures(???)

Where is the signature of Ug99 ??

04/12/23 16Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 17: 17022011

What are the available DNA markers to identify Ug99

SSR

AFLP

Mol Plant PathLatest Nov 2008 issue

04/12/2317Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 18: 17022011

SSR data- no DNA signature

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue

04/12/23 18Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 19: 17022011

AFLP adapters used to generate signature data

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue

04/12/23 19Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 20: 17022011

AFLP signatures

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue04/12/23 20Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 21: 17022011

No clear signature of Ug55 & 99 by SSR

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue

04/12/23 21Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 22: 17022011

AFLP again poor signature b/w Ug99/55

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue04/12/23 22Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 23: 17022011

DNA signature of Ug99 by combining data of SSR+AFLP

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue

04/12/23 23Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 24: 17022011

Clear DNA signature by Minimum-spanning network analysis

Mol Plant Path Nov 2008 issue04/12/23 24Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 25: 17022011

What bioinformatics can do more in Ug99 identification?

Allele mining of Puccinia graminis tritici Ug99– USDA is targeting 400 SNP

STR mining from Puccinia graminis genome data base

STR based signature search

04/12/23 25Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 26: 17022011

Puccinia graminis database

Genome of P. graminis tritici88.54 Mb, 392 scaffolds, contigs 4557

04/12/23 26Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 27: 17022011

Our experiences-DNA based gender signature using bioinformatics tools

04/12/23 27Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 28: 17022011

New PCR-RFLP test developed for Lactobacillus species differentiation

KspAI Bsh1236I Mun I L P P R R R P P R R R P P R R R

KEU1 5'-AAY ATG ATI ACI GGI GCI GCI CAR ATG GA-3' KEU 2 5'-AYR TTI TCI CCI GGC ATI ACC AT-3'.KspAI L.paracasei 542,158bp; L.rhamnosa 701bpBsh1236I L. paracasei 547,153bp; L. rhamnosa 701bpMun I L. paracasei 594,106bp; L. rhamnosa 701bp

Our experiences-DNA based microbial species signature using bioinformatics

House Keeping Genes -CLUSTAL-W-signature with spelling mistake- CLEAVER

04/12/23 28Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 29: 17022011

DNA based signature of domestic species

Mitochindrial DNA markers used especially for meat identification, poaching of wild animals, adulteration of dairy milk, dairy products(like cheese) of various

domestic animal species.

04/12/23 29Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 30: 17022011

DNA based signature of domestic animal breeds

Whether a livestock breed can be identified from a sample of blood, semen, hair, blood spot, carcass etc?

Studies have succeeded in developing a technology for breed certification and breed-specific genetic/DNA signature

Degree of accuracy of certification of a breed -between 95% to 99%. STR based three methods viz (i) Frequency method (Paetkau et al., 1995), (ii) Bayesian method (Rannala et al, 1997) and (iii) Distance methods (Goldstein et al 1995)

Use

(i) Development of breed-specific signatures/profiles and

(ii) Development of breed hybrid index.

04/12/23 30Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 31: 17022011

STR & breed-specific signatures/profiles Pig-In UK, Signer et al. (2000) - minisatellite probe pCMS12 -three breeds of pig viz

Chinese, Meishan, Large White and other European breeds. The linear discrimination analysis revealed that the DNA profiles were breed specific.

Fish-In Finland, Primmer et al. (2000) - disputed fish to a specific population out of 4 suspected fish populations using 7 microsatellite loci by Bayesian method with confidence limit of 99%.

Sheep-In Spain, Arranz et al. (2001) - Bayesian method with 99.63% accuracy among five Spanish sheep breed viz. Churra, Latxa, Castellana, Rasa-Aragonesa and Merino using 18 microsatellite markers.

Horse-In Norway, Bjornstad et al. (2001) -26 microsatellite loci in six breeds of horses, Fjord, Nordland/ Lyngen, Dole, Trotter, Icelandic horse and Shetland pony with more than 95% confidence limit.

Cattle-In European countries, Canon et al. (2001) -confidence limit of 99% for 18 local breeds of cattle of different countries; Alistana, Astruriana, Asturiana Valles, Sayaguesa, Tudanca, Avilena Negra-Iberica, Bruna del Pirineus, Morucha, Pirenaica, Retinta of Spain; Alentejana, Barrosa, Maronesa, Mertolenga, Mirandesa of Portugal and Aubrac, Gasconne, Salers of France

Camel- In Kenya, Mburu et al. (2003) - 4 breeds using 14 microsatellite loci of camel viz. Somali, Turkana, Rendille, Gabbra) using maximum likelihood method up to 48 % confidence limit.-weak genetic differentiation and gene flow between populations.

Dog-In Finland, Koskinen (2003) has assigned breeds of domestic dog using microsatellite with 100% accuracy.

3104/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 32: 17022011

Development of breed hybrid indices/ profiles

Campton and Utter (1985) -hybrid index, hybrid index for analyzing hybridization between cut-throat (Oncorhynchus clarkii , Salmonidae) and rainbow trout ( O. mykiss , Salmonidae), and they used allozyme loci for which the two species were almost fixed for alternate alleles.

Hansen et al. (2000) found that hybrid index statistic is also useful for microsatellite loci and t- interbreeding between wild and domesticated brown trout,

Softwares:ASSIGNMENT CALCULATOR,

GENECLASS or

ARLEQUIN and then importing the data into a spreadsheet where the final calculations can be done.

Relevance in Indian context- exotic inheritance calculation, Bos indicusx taurus, Alpine x Beetal

cross/admixture populations

04/12/23 32Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 33: 17022011

Future breed signature of domestic animals

Courtesy: Curt & his group USDA

04/12/23 33Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 34: 17022011

04/12/23 34Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 35: 17022011

Few examples: Signature applications1. Application of polymerase chain reaction to detect adulteration of sheep's milk

with goats: J Dairy Sci (2005) 88: 3115-20.

2. A novel approach to the quantification of bovine milk in ovine cheeses using a duplex PCR: J Agric Food Chem (2004) 52: 4943-7.

3. Rapid detection of cows' milk in sheeps' and goats' milk by a species-specific polymerase: J Dairy Sci (2004) 87: 2839-45.

4. Identification of cow's milk in "buffalo" cheese by duplex polymerase chain reaction. J Food Prot (2002) 65: 362-6.

5. Forensic identification of ungulate species using restriction digests of PCR-amplified mit J Forensic Sci (1995) 40: 943-51. (15 species)

6. Detection of cows' milk in goats' cheeses inferred from mitochondrial DNA polymorphism Journal of Dairy Research (2001), 68:229-235

7.Application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of goats' milk adulteration by milk of cow. Journal of Dairy Research (2001), 68:333-336

04/12/23 35Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 36: 17022011

DNA based signature of plant variety, example-Basmati rice

Basmati rice -aroma compound -2-acetyl-1-pyrroline. Fraudulent traders to adulterate traditional basmati. PCR-based assay similar to DNA fingerprinting in

humans allows for the detection of adulterated and non-basmati strains. Its detection limit for adulteration is from

1% upwards with an error rate of ±1.5%. Exporters of basmati rice use 'purity certificates' based

on DNA tests for their basmati rice consignments. It was developed by CDFD, Labindia, World's First Single-tube, Multiplex(co-amplify eight

microsatellite loci) Microsatellite Assay-based Kit for Basmati Authentication.

04/12/23 36Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 37: 17022011

DNA based bar-coded signature of fish

Ward et al (2005) - cox1 sequencing, or ‘barcoding’, in to identification of fish species.

207 fish, mostly Australian marine fish, were sequenced (bar coded) for a 655 bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (cox1).

Most species were represented by multiple specimens, and 754 sequences were generated.

The GC content of the 143 species of teleosts was higher than the 61 species of sharks and rays (47.1% versus 42.2%), largely due to a higher GC content of codon position 3 in the former (41.1% versus 29.9%).

04/12/23 37Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 38: 17022011

Few examples of individual DNA signature and family signature

* Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case (Chennai, Tamil Nadu),

* Naina Sahni or the Tandoor case (New Delhi

* Priyadarshini Mattoo (New Delhi),

* Sishu Vihar Child adoption case (Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh),

* Black Buck killing case (Jodhpur, Rajasthan)

* Beanth Singh Assassination Case (Punjab)

04/12/23 38Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

Page 39: 17022011

http://www.dnabarcodes.org

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 39

Page 40: 17022011

What is CBOL?

The Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) is an international initiative devoted to developing DNA barcoding as a global standard for the identification of biological species. DNA barcoding is a new technique that uses a short DNA sequence from a standardized and agreed-upon position in the genome as a molecular diagnostic for species-level identification. DNA barcode sequences are very short relative to the entire genome and they can be obtained reasonably quickly and cheaply. The "Folmer region" at the 5' end of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 mitochondrial region (COI) is emerging as the standard barcode region for almost all groups of higher animals. This region is 648 nucleotide base pairs long in most groups and is flanked by regions of conserved sequences, making it relatively easy to isolate and analyze. A growing number of studies have shown that COI sequence variability is very low (generally less than 1-2%) and that the COI sequences of even closely related species differ by several percent, making it possible to identify species with high confidence. For those groups in which COI is unable to resolve species-level differences, CBOL recommends the use of an additional gene region. In some groups, COI is not an effective barcode region and a different standard region must be identified. In all cases, DNA barcoding is based on the use of a short, standard region that enables cost-effective species identification .

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 40

Page 41: 17022011

http://www.fishbol.org/

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 41

Page 42: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 42

Page 43: 17022011

Barcode of Life Data systems

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 43

Page 44: 17022011

Mito Fish Databasehttp://mitofish.ori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 44

Page 45: 17022011

http://www.fishbase.org/search.php

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 45

Page 46: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 46

Page 47: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 47

If no RE site then?Which RE is species specific?

Page 48: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 48

Page 49: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 49

Page 50: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 50

Page 51: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 51

Page 52: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 52

Page 53: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 53

Page 54: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 54

Page 55: 17022011

Real time PCR-Taqman probe designing

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 55

Page 56: 17022011

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 56

Page 57: 17022011

04/12/23

Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 57

Page 58: 17022011

Conclusion DNA based species signature is possible Why to do it? Who has to do? What we need? How to proceed? Germplasm wealth of “third world” countries

needs protection and pragmatic use! Biotechnology/Bioinformatics has immense role Journey of IT & BT !

04/12/23 Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011 58

Page 59: 17022011

Dinesh-PU-Talk-17-02-2011

AcknowledgementsDr Jagdeep Kaur , Dr Jagtar Singh & team, Biotechnology Department , Punjab University, ChandigarhMy students- Prashant, Prem, Nishant, Dhiraj (NBAGR)My UG/PG students- Pooja(NISER) & Uday(GU)Dr James Reecy & his group, Iowa State University, USADr DK Arora, NBAIM(ICAR)Dr Rameshwar Singh & Dr SK Tomar, NDRI

04/12/23 59