15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15...
-
Upload
cameron-cribb -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
4
Transcript of 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15...
15 – 1Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Resource PlanningResource Planning15
For For Operations Management, 9eOperations Management, 9e by by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra © 2010 Pearson Education© 2010 Pearson Education
PowerPoint Slides PowerPoint Slides by Jeff Heylby Jeff Heyl
15 – 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Resource PlanningResource Planning
At the heart of any organization
Starts with sales and operations plans and plans the input requirements
A process relative to the firm’s competitive priorities and an important part of managing supply chains
15 – 3Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning
What an ERP system does Integrating the firm’s functional areas Used by many different types of organizations
How ERP systems are designed Single comprehensive database Managers to monitor all of the company’s products at
all locations and at all times Information is automatically updated in the all
applications when transactions occur Streamlines the data flows throughout the organization Requires a careful analysis of major processes Significant changes in ERP systems - interoperability
15 – 4Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Back-Office Processes Front-Office Processes
HumanResources• Benefits• Payroll
Data Analysis• Product costing• Job costs
Sales and Marketing• Sales orders• Pricing system
Customer Service• Field service• Quality
Supply-ChainManagement• Forecasting• Purchasing• Distribution
Accounting and Finance• Accounts payable and receivable
• General ledgers• Asset management
Manufacturing• Material requirements planning
• Scheduling
ERP System
Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning
Figure 15.1 – ERP Application Modules
15 – 5Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
MRP is a computerized information system to manage dependent demand inventory and schedule orders
Translates the master production schedule into requirements for all subassemblies, components, and raw materials through the MRP explosion
Materials Requirements Planning Materials Requirements Planning
Dependent demand Quantity required varies with the production plans of
other items Component Parent
15 – 6Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Inventorytransactions
Inventoryrecords
Bills ofmaterials
Engineeringand process
designs
Othersources
of demand
Authorizedmaster production
schedule
Materialrequirements
plan
MRPexplosion
MRP InputsMRP Inputs
Figure 15.2 – Material Requirements Plan Inputs
15 – 7Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Demand PatternsDemand Patterns
| | | | | | | | | |
1 5 10 Day
2000 –
1500 –
1000 –
500 –
0
Bic
ycl
es
(a) Parent inventory
Reorder point
Order1000 onday 3
Order1000 onday 8
(b) Component demand
2000 –
1500 –
1000 –
500 –
0
Rim
s| | | | | | | | | |
1 5 10 Day
Figure 15.3 – Lumpy Dependent Demand Resulting from Continuous Independent Demand
15 – 8Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
A record of all components of an item
Shows the parent-component relationship
The usage quantities are derived from engineering and process design
Bill of MaterialsBill of Materials
Five common terms End items Intermediate items Subassemblies Purchased items
Part commonality (sometimes called standardization of parts or modularity)
15 – 9Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Seat cushion
Seat-frame boards
Front legs A
Ladder-back chair
Back legs
Leg supports
Back slats
Bill of MaterialsBill of Materials
Figure 15.4 – BOM for a Ladder-Back Chair
15 – 10Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
J (4)Seat-frame
boards
Bill of MaterialsBill of Materials
G (4)Back slats
F (2)Back legs
I (1)Seat cushion
H (1)Seat frame
C (1)Seat
subassembly
D (2)Front legs
B (1)Ladder-backsubassembly
E (4)Leg
supports
ALadder-back
chair
Figure 15.4 – BOM for a Ladder-Back Chair
15 – 11Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Details how many end items will be produced within specified periods of time
It breaks the sales and operations plan into specific product schedules
Create a prospective MPS and test whether it meets the schedule with available resources
Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Sums of quantities must equal sales and operational plan
Production must be allocated efficiently over time
Capacity limitations and bottlenecks may be determined
15 – 12Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)
April May
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Ladder-back chair
Kitchen chair
Desk chair
Aggregate production plans for chair family
Figure 15.5 – MPS for a Family of Chairs
150 150
120 120
200 200 200 200
670 670
15 – 13Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
No
Materialrequirements
planning
Yes
Authorized masterproductionschedule
Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Are resourcesavailable?
Prospective masterproductionschedule
Authorizedproduction
plan
Figure 15.6 – Master Production Scheduling Process
15 – 15Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Item: Ladder-back chair
Quantity on Hand:
Forecast
Customer orders (booked)
Projected on-hand inventory
MPS quantity
MPS start
April
1 2
Developing a MPSDeveloping a MPS
55
30 30
38 27
17 –13
0 0
Explanation:Forecast is less than booked orders in week 1; projected on-hand inventory balance = 55 + 0 – 38 = 17.
Explanation:Forecast exceeds booked orders in week 2; projected on-hand inventory balance = 17 + 0 – 30 = –13. The shortage signals a need to schedule an MPS quantity for completion in week 2.
Figure 15.7 – Master Production Schedule for Weeks 1 and 2
15 – 16Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Developing a MPSDeveloping a MPS
The goal is to maintain a nonnegative projected on-hand inventory balance
As shortages are detected, MPS quantities should be scheduled to cover them
Step 2: Determine the timing and size of MPS quantities
=Inventory17 chairs in
inventory at theend of week 1
+MPS quantityof 150 chairs –
Forecast of30 chairs
= 137 chairs
15 – 17Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory The quantity of an end item that marketing can promise
to deliver on specific dates It is the difference between customer orders already
booked and the quantity that operations is planning to produce
Freezing the MPS
Reconciling the MPS with sales and operations plans
15 – 18Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 15.9 –MPS Record with an ATP Row
Item: Ladder-back chair Order Policy: 150 unitsLead Time: 1 week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
April
Forecast
Customerorders booked
Projected on-hand inventory
MPS quantity
MPS start
Quantityon Hand:
30
38
30
27
30
24
30
8 0
35
0
35
0 0
3535
55
May
17 137 107 77 42 7 122 87
0 150 0 0 0 0 150 0
150 0 0 0 0 150 0 0
Available-to-promise (ATP)inventory
17 91 150
Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Explanation:The total of customer orders booked until the next MPS receipt is 38 units. The ATP = 55 (on-hand) + 0 (MPS quantity) – 38 = 17.
Explanation:The total of customer orders booked until the next MPS receipt is 27 + 24 + 8 = 59 units. The ATP = 150 (MPS quantity) – 59 = 91 units..
15 – 19Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Application 15.1Application 15.1
Determine the MPS for Product A that has a 50-unit policy and 5 units on hand. The demand forecast and booked orders are shown in the partially completed plan given in the Student Notes. The lead time is one week. Here is the completed plan. You might want to ask a question or two on how they would respond to a customer request for a specific week and order quantity.
15 – 20Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Application 15.1Application 15.1
Item: Product A Order Policy: 50 units
Lead Time: 1 week
Quantity on Hand 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20
Customer orders (booked) 30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0
Projected on-hand inventory
MPS quantity 50
MPS start
Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory
SOLUTION
15 – 21Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Application 15.1Application 15.1
Item: Product A Order Policy: 50 units
Lead Time: 1 week
Quantity on Hand 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20
Customer orders (booked) 30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0
Projected on-hand inventory
MPS quantity
MPS start
Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory
SOLUTION
25 5
50
5
5 5 3 23 3 13 43
50 50 50 50
50 50 50
35 50 50 50
15
50
15 – 22Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 15.8 – Master Production Schedule for Weeks 1–8
Item: Ladder-back chair Order Policy: 150 unitsLead Time: 1 week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
April
Forecast
Customerorders booked
Projected on-hand inventory
MPS quantity
MPS start
Quantityon Hand:
30
38
30
27
30
24
30
8 0
35
0
35
0 0
3535
55
May
17 137 107 77 42 7 122 87
0 150 0 0 0 0 150 0
150 0 0 0 0 150 0 0
Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Explanation:On-hand inventory balance = 17 + 150 – 30 = 137. The MPS quantity is needed to avoid a shortage of 30 – 17 = 13 chairs in week 2.
Explanation:The time needed to assemble 150 chairs is 1 week. The assembly department must start assembling chairs in week 1 to have them ready by week 2.
15 – 23Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Inventory RecordInventory Record
Inventory transactions are the basic building blocks of up-to-date records
Transactions include releasing new orders, receiving scheduled receipts, adjusting due dates for scheduled receipts, withdrawing inventory, canceling orders, correcting inventory errors, rejecting shipments, and verifying losses and stock returns
Inventory records divide the future into time periods called time buckets
Keep track of inventory levels and component replenishment needs
15 – 24Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Inventory RecordInventory Record
The time-phase information contained in the inventory record consists of: Gross requirements Scheduled receipts Projected on-hand inventory Planned receipts Planned order releases
= + –Projected on-handinventory balanceat end of week t
Inventory onhand at end of
week t–1
Scheduledor plannedreceipts in
week t
Grossrequirements
in week t
15 – 25Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Inventory RecordInventory Record
Weeks 2 and 3: 117 + 0 – 0 = 117
The on-hand inventory calculations for each week in Figure 15.10 are as follows
Week 4: 117 + 0 – 120 = –3
Week 5: –3 + 0 – 0 = –3
Week 6: –3 + 0 – 150 = –153
Week 7: –153 + 0 – 120 = –273
Week 8: –273 + 0 – 0 = –273
Week 1: 37 + 230 – 150 = 117
15 – 26Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Inventory RecordInventory RecordItem: CDescription: Seat subassembly
Lot Size: 230 unitsLead Time: 2 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Grossrequirements 0 0 0 0
Scheduledreceipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Projectedon-handinventory
117 117 –3 –3 –153 –273 –273
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Explanation:Gross requirements are the total demand for the two chairs. Projected on-hand inventory in week 1 is 37 + 230 – 150 = 117 units.
Figure 15.10 – MRP Record for the Seat Subassembly
37
120 120150150
117
230
15 – 27Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Inventory RecordInventory RecordItem: CDescription: Seat subassembly
Lot Size: 230 unitsLead Time: 2 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Grossrequirements 150 0 0
Scheduledreceipts 230 0 0
Projectedon-handinventory
117 117 117
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
37
Without a planned receipt in week 4, a shortage of 3 units will occur: 117 + 0 + 0 – 120 = –3 units. Adding the planned receipt brings the balance to 117 + 0 + 230 – 120 = 227 units. Offsetting for a 2-week lead time puts the corresponding planned order release back to week 2.
The first planned receipt lasts until week 7, when projected inventory would drop to 77 + 0 + 0 – 120 = –43 units. Adding the second planned receipt brings the balance to 77 + 0 + 230 – 120 = 187 units. The corresponding planned order release is for week 5 (or week 7 minus 2 weeks).
120
0
227
230
230
230
230
187
120
0
77
0 150
0 0
227
0
0
187
Figure 15.11 – Completed Inventory Record for the Seat Subassembly
15 – 28Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Planning lead time
For purchased items planning lead time is the time allowed for receiving a shipment from the supplier
Planning FactorsPlanning Factors
For manufactured the planning lead time consists of estimates for Setup time Processing time Materials handling time between operations Waiting time
15 – 29Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Lot-sizing rules
Fixed order quantity (FQO) rule maintains the same order quantity each time an order is issued
Could be determined by quantity discounts, truckload capacity, minimum purchases, or EOQ
Planning FactorsPlanning Factors
15 – 33Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Lot-for-lot (L4L) rule where the lot size covers the gross requirements of a single week
Planning FactorsPlanning Factors
= –L4L lot size to arrive in
week t
Gross requirementsfor week t
Projected on-hand inventory balance at
end of week t–1
Figure 15.13 shows the application of the L4L
= –(L4L lot size) Gross requirementsin week 4
Inventory balance at end of week 3
(L4L lot size) = 120 – 117 = 3 units
15 – 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Planning FactorsPlanning Factors
Figure 15.13 – The L4L Rule for the Seat Subassembly
15 – 43Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Lot sizes affect inventory costs and setup and ordering costs
The FOQ rule generates a high level of average inventory because it creates inventory remnants
The POQ rule reduces the amount of average on-hand inventory because it does a better job of matching order quantity to requirements
The L4L rule minimizes inventory investment, but it also maximizes the number of orders placed
Planning FactorsPlanning Factors
15 – 44Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Planning FactorsPlanning Factors
Safety stock for dependent demand items with lumpy demand (gross requirements) is helpful only when future gross requirements, the timing or size of scheduled receipts, and the amount of scrap that will be produced are certain
Safety stock is used for end items and purchased items to protect against fluctuating customer orders and unreliable suppliers
15 – 46Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturing resources plan
Performance reports
Outputs from MRPOutputs from MRP
Material requirements plan
Action notices Releasing new orders Adjusting due dates
Priority reports Dispatch lists Supplier schedules
Capacity reports Capacity requirements planning Finite capacity scheduling Input-output control
Cost and price data
MRP explosion
Routings and time
standards
Figure 15.15 – MRP Outputs
15 – 47Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion
Translates the MPS and other sources of demand into the requirements needed for all of the subassemblies, components, and raw materials the firm needs to produce parent items
An item’s gross requirements are derived from three sources The MPS for immediate parents that are end items The planned order releases for parents below the MPS
level Any other requirements not originating in the MPS, such
as the demand for replacement parts
15 – 48Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion
J(4)Seat-frame
boards
C(1)Seat
subassembly
H(1)Seat
frame
I(1)Seat
cushion
Figure 15.16 – BOM for the Seat Subassembly
15 – 49Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Item: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units
Lead time: 2 weeks
Gross requirements 150
1
230
117
2 3
120
4 5
150
6
120
7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
37
Week
117 117
0 00 0
0 0 00 00 0
227 227 77 187 187
230230
230230
MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 50Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Item: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units
Lead time: 2 weeks
Gross requirements 150150
1 2 3
120120
4 5
150150
6
120120
7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
0 00 0
230
230
230
230
MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 51Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
40
Week
00 00 00300 00 0
Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
0
Week
00 00 000 00 0
MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units
Lead time: 2 weeks
Gross requirements 150150
1 2 3
120120
4 5
150150
6
120120
7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
0 00 0
230
230
230
230
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 52Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
40
Week
00 00 00300 00 0
Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
0
Week
00 00 000 00 0
MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units
Lead time: 2 weeks
Gross requirements 150150
1 2 3
120120
4 5
150150
6
120120
7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
0 00 0
230
230
230
230
Usage quantity: 1 Usage quantity: 1
0 230 0 230
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 53Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
40
Week
00 00 00300 00 0
Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
0
Week
00 00 000 00 0
MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units
Lead time: 2 weeks
Gross requirements 150150
1 2 3
120120
4 5
150150
6
120120
7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
0 00 0
230
230
230
230
Usage quantity: 1 Usage quantity: 1
0 230 0 230 00 230000 2300
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 54Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units
Lead time: 2 weeks
Gross requirements 150150
1 2 3
120120
4 5
150150
6
120120
7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
0 00 0
230
230
230
230
Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
40
Week
00 00 00300 00 0
Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
0
Week
00 00 000 00 0
0 230 0 230 00 230000 2300 00 00 0
4040 110110 110110 110 180 180 180 180
300
300
00 00 0
00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0
230
230
230
230
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 56Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
200
Week
00 00 000 00 0
Projected on-hand inventory
Item: Seat-frame boardsLot size: 1500 units
Lead time: 1 week
00 1200 00 000 00 0
MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat framesLot size: 300 units
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
300
300
Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
230
230
230
230
00 00 00 00230 2300 000 00 00 00230 2300 0
Usage quantity: 4
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 57Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat framesLot size: 300 units
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
300
300
Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L
Lead time: 1 week
Gross requirements
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
Week
230
230
230
230
00 00 00 00230 2300 000 00 00 00230 2300 0
Gross requirements
1
00
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Scheduled receipts
Planned receipts
Planned order releases
200
Week
00 00 000 00 0
Projected on-hand inventory
Item: Seat-frame boardsLot size: 1500 units
Lead time: 1 week
00 1200 00 000 00 0
200 200 200 500 500 500 500 500
1500
1500
Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components
15 – 58Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Other Important ReportsOther Important Reports
Action notice
Capacity requirements planning (CRP)
Theory of constraints principles can be applied to keep bottleneck operations fed by adjusting some lot sizing rules or occasionally overriding planned order releases
Priority reports
Manufacturing resource planning (MRP II)
15 – 59Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
MRP and the EnvironmentMRP and the Environment
Consumer and government concern about the deterioration of the natural environment has driven manufacturers to reengineer their processes to become more environmentally friendly
Companies can modify their MRP systems to help track these waste and plans for their disposal
15 – 66Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Resource Planning for Service Providers
Dependent demand for services Restaurants Airlines Hospitals Hotels
Bill of resources (BOR)
15 – 67Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
(a)
Level 1Discharge
Level 2Intermediate care
Level 3Postoperative care
(Step down)
Level 4Postoperative care
(Intensive)
Level 7Preoperative care
(Testing)
Level 5Surgery
Level 6Preoperative care
(Angiogram)
(b)
Bill of ResourcesBill of Resources
Figure 15.18 – BOR for Treating an Aneurysm
Nurse(6 hr)
MD(1 hr)
Therapy(1 hr)
Bed(24 hr)
Lab(3 tests)
Kitchen(1 meal)
Pharmacy(10
medicines)
Level 6Preoperative care
(Angiogram)