15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15...

47
15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Resource Planning Planning 15 For For Operations Management, Operations Management, 9e 9e by by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotr Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotr a a PowerPoint PowerPoint Slides by Jeff Slides by Jeff Heyl Heyl

Transcript of 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15...

Page 1: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 1Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Resource PlanningResource Planning15

For For Operations Management, 9eOperations Management, 9e by by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra © 2010 Pearson Education© 2010 Pearson Education

PowerPoint Slides PowerPoint Slides by Jeff Heylby Jeff Heyl

Page 2: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Resource PlanningResource Planning

At the heart of any organization

Starts with sales and operations plans and plans the input requirements

A process relative to the firm’s competitive priorities and an important part of managing supply chains

Page 3: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 3Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning

What an ERP system does Integrating the firm’s functional areas Used by many different types of organizations

How ERP systems are designed Single comprehensive database Managers to monitor all of the company’s products at

all locations and at all times Information is automatically updated in the all

applications when transactions occur Streamlines the data flows throughout the organization Requires a careful analysis of major processes Significant changes in ERP systems - interoperability

Page 4: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 4Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Back-Office Processes Front-Office Processes

HumanResources• Benefits• Payroll

Data Analysis• Product costing• Job costs

Sales and Marketing• Sales orders• Pricing system

Customer Service• Field service• Quality

Supply-ChainManagement• Forecasting• Purchasing• Distribution

Accounting and Finance• Accounts payable and receivable

• General ledgers• Asset management

Manufacturing• Material requirements planning

• Scheduling

ERP System

Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning

Figure 15.1 – ERP Application Modules

Page 5: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 5Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

MRP is a computerized information system to manage dependent demand inventory and schedule orders

Translates the master production schedule into requirements for all subassemblies, components, and raw materials through the MRP explosion

Materials Requirements Planning Materials Requirements Planning

Dependent demand Quantity required varies with the production plans of

other items Component Parent

Page 6: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 6Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventorytransactions

Inventoryrecords

Bills ofmaterials

Engineeringand process

designs

Othersources

of demand

Authorizedmaster production

schedule

Materialrequirements

plan

MRPexplosion

MRP InputsMRP Inputs

Figure 15.2 – Material Requirements Plan Inputs

Page 7: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 7Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Demand PatternsDemand Patterns

| | | | | | | | | |

1 5 10 Day

2000 –

1500 –

1000 –

500 –

0

Bic

ycl

es

(a) Parent inventory

Reorder point

Order1000 onday 3

Order1000 onday 8

(b) Component demand

2000 –

1500 –

1000 –

500 –

0

Rim

s| | | | | | | | | |

1 5 10 Day

Figure 15.3 – Lumpy Dependent Demand Resulting from Continuous Independent Demand

Page 8: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 8Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

A record of all components of an item

Shows the parent-component relationship

The usage quantities are derived from engineering and process design

Bill of MaterialsBill of Materials

Five common terms End items Intermediate items Subassemblies Purchased items

Part commonality (sometimes called standardization of parts or modularity)

Page 9: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 9Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Seat cushion

Seat-frame boards

Front legs A

Ladder-back chair

Back legs

Leg supports

Back slats

Bill of MaterialsBill of Materials

Figure 15.4 – BOM for a Ladder-Back Chair

Page 10: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 10Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

J (4)Seat-frame

boards

Bill of MaterialsBill of Materials

G (4)Back slats

F (2)Back legs

I (1)Seat cushion

H (1)Seat frame

C (1)Seat

subassembly

D (2)Front legs

B (1)Ladder-backsubassembly

E (4)Leg

supports

ALadder-back

chair

Figure 15.4 – BOM for a Ladder-Back Chair

Page 11: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 11Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Details how many end items will be produced within specified periods of time

It breaks the sales and operations plan into specific product schedules

Create a prospective MPS and test whether it meets the schedule with available resources

Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)

Sums of quantities must equal sales and operational plan

Production must be allocated efficiently over time

Capacity limitations and bottlenecks may be determined

Page 12: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 12Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)

April May

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Ladder-back chair

Kitchen chair

Desk chair

Aggregate production plans for chair family

Figure 15.5 – MPS for a Family of Chairs

150 150

120 120

200 200 200 200

670 670

Page 13: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 13Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

No

Materialrequirements

planning

Yes

Authorized masterproductionschedule

Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)

Are resourcesavailable?

Prospective masterproductionschedule

Authorizedproduction

plan

Figure 15.6 – Master Production Scheduling Process

Page 14: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 15Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Item: Ladder-back chair

Quantity on Hand:

Forecast

Customer orders (booked)

Projected on-hand inventory

MPS quantity

MPS start

April

1 2

Developing a MPSDeveloping a MPS

55

30 30

38 27

17 –13

0 0

Explanation:Forecast is less than booked orders in week 1; projected on-hand inventory balance = 55 + 0 – 38 = 17.

Explanation:Forecast exceeds booked orders in week 2; projected on-hand inventory balance = 17 + 0 – 30 = –13. The shortage signals a need to schedule an MPS quantity for completion in week 2.

Figure 15.7 – Master Production Schedule for Weeks 1 and 2

Page 15: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 16Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Developing a MPSDeveloping a MPS

The goal is to maintain a nonnegative projected on-hand inventory balance

As shortages are detected, MPS quantities should be scheduled to cover them

Step 2: Determine the timing and size of MPS quantities

=Inventory17 chairs in

inventory at theend of week 1

+MPS quantityof 150 chairs –

Forecast of30 chairs

= 137 chairs

Page 16: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 17Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)

Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory The quantity of an end item that marketing can promise

to deliver on specific dates It is the difference between customer orders already

booked and the quantity that operations is planning to produce

Freezing the MPS

Reconciling the MPS with sales and operations plans

Page 17: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 18Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Figure 15.9 –MPS Record with an ATP Row

Item: Ladder-back chair Order Policy: 150 unitsLead Time: 1 week

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

April

Forecast

Customerorders booked

Projected on-hand inventory

MPS quantity

MPS start

Quantityon Hand:

30

38

30

27

30

24

30

8 0

35

0

35

0 0

3535

55

May

17 137 107 77 42 7 122 87

0 150 0 0 0 0 150 0

150 0 0 0 0 150 0 0

Available-to-promise (ATP)inventory

17 91 150

Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)

Explanation:The total of customer orders booked until the next MPS receipt is 38 units. The ATP = 55 (on-hand) + 0 (MPS quantity) – 38 = 17.

Explanation:The total of customer orders booked until the next MPS receipt is 27 + 24 + 8 = 59 units. The ATP = 150 (MPS quantity) – 59 = 91 units..

Page 18: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 19Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Application 15.1Application 15.1

Determine the MPS for Product A that has a 50-unit policy and 5 units on hand. The demand forecast and booked orders are shown in the partially completed plan given in the Student Notes. The lead time is one week. Here is the completed plan. You might want to ask a question or two on how they would respond to a customer request for a specific week and order quantity.

Page 19: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 20Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Application 15.1Application 15.1

Item: Product A Order Policy: 50 units

Lead Time: 1 week

Quantity on Hand 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20

Customer orders (booked) 30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0

Projected on-hand inventory

MPS quantity 50

MPS start

Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory

SOLUTION

Page 20: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 21Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Application 15.1Application 15.1

Item: Product A Order Policy: 50 units

Lead Time: 1 week

Quantity on Hand 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20

Customer orders (booked) 30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0

Projected on-hand inventory

MPS quantity

MPS start

Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory

SOLUTION

25 5

50

5

5 5 3 23 3 13 43

50 50 50 50

50 50 50

35 50 50 50

15

50

Page 21: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 22Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Figure 15.8 – Master Production Schedule for Weeks 1–8

Item: Ladder-back chair Order Policy: 150 unitsLead Time: 1 week

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

April

Forecast

Customerorders booked

Projected on-hand inventory

MPS quantity

MPS start

Quantityon Hand:

30

38

30

27

30

24

30

8 0

35

0

35

0 0

3535

55

May

17 137 107 77 42 7 122 87

0 150 0 0 0 0 150 0

150 0 0 0 0 150 0 0

Master Production Schedule (MPS)Master Production Schedule (MPS)

Explanation:On-hand inventory balance = 17 + 150 – 30 = 137. The MPS quantity is needed to avoid a shortage of 30 – 17 = 13 chairs in week 2.

Explanation:The time needed to assemble 150 chairs is 1 week. The assembly department must start assembling chairs in week 1 to have them ready by week 2.

Page 22: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 23Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventory RecordInventory Record

Inventory transactions are the basic building blocks of up-to-date records

Transactions include releasing new orders, receiving scheduled receipts, adjusting due dates for scheduled receipts, withdrawing inventory, canceling orders, correcting inventory errors, rejecting shipments, and verifying losses and stock returns

Inventory records divide the future into time periods called time buckets

Keep track of inventory levels and component replenishment needs

Page 23: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 24Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventory RecordInventory Record

The time-phase information contained in the inventory record consists of: Gross requirements Scheduled receipts Projected on-hand inventory Planned receipts Planned order releases

= + –Projected on-handinventory balanceat end of week t

Inventory onhand at end of

week t–1

Scheduledor plannedreceipts in

week t

Grossrequirements

in week t

Page 24: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 25Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventory RecordInventory Record

Weeks 2 and 3: 117 + 0 – 0 = 117

The on-hand inventory calculations for each week in Figure 15.10 are as follows

Week 4: 117 + 0 – 120 = –3

Week 5: –3 + 0 – 0 = –3

Week 6: –3 + 0 – 150 = –153

Week 7: –153 + 0 – 120 = –273

Week 8: –273 + 0 – 0 = –273

Week 1: 37 + 230 – 150 = 117

Page 25: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 26Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventory RecordInventory RecordItem: CDescription: Seat subassembly

Lot Size: 230 unitsLead Time: 2 weeks

Week

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Grossrequirements 0 0 0 0

Scheduledreceipts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Projectedon-handinventory

117 117 –3 –3 –153 –273 –273

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Explanation:Gross requirements are the total demand for the two chairs. Projected on-hand inventory in week 1 is 37 + 230 – 150 = 117 units.

Figure 15.10 – MRP Record for the Seat Subassembly

37

120 120150150

117

230

Page 26: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 27Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventory RecordInventory RecordItem: CDescription: Seat subassembly

Lot Size: 230 unitsLead Time: 2 weeks

Week

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Grossrequirements 150 0 0

Scheduledreceipts 230 0 0

Projectedon-handinventory

117 117 117

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

37

Without a planned receipt in week 4, a shortage of 3 units will occur: 117 + 0 + 0 – 120 = –3 units. Adding the planned receipt brings the balance to 117 + 0 + 230 – 120 = 227 units. Offsetting for a 2-week lead time puts the corresponding planned order release back to week 2.

The first planned receipt lasts until week 7, when projected inventory would drop to 77 + 0 + 0 – 120 = –43 units. Adding the second planned receipt brings the balance to 77 + 0 + 230 – 120 = 187 units. The corresponding planned order release is for week 5 (or week 7 minus 2 weeks).

120

0

227

230

230

230

230

187

120

0

77

0 150

0 0

227

0

0

187

Figure 15.11 – Completed Inventory Record for the Seat Subassembly

Page 27: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 28Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Planning lead time

For purchased items planning lead time is the time allowed for receiving a shipment from the supplier

Planning FactorsPlanning Factors

For manufactured the planning lead time consists of estimates for Setup time Processing time Materials handling time between operations Waiting time

Page 28: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 29Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Lot-sizing rules

Fixed order quantity (FQO) rule maintains the same order quantity each time an order is issued

Could be determined by quantity discounts, truckload capacity, minimum purchases, or EOQ

Planning FactorsPlanning Factors

Page 29: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 33Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Lot-for-lot (L4L) rule where the lot size covers the gross requirements of a single week

Planning FactorsPlanning Factors

= –L4L lot size to arrive in

week t

Gross requirementsfor week t

Projected on-hand inventory balance at

end of week t–1

Figure 15.13 shows the application of the L4L

= –(L4L lot size) Gross requirementsin week 4

Inventory balance at end of week 3

(L4L lot size) = 120 – 117 = 3 units

Page 30: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Planning FactorsPlanning Factors

Figure 15.13 – The L4L Rule for the Seat Subassembly

Page 31: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 43Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Lot sizes affect inventory costs and setup and ordering costs

The FOQ rule generates a high level of average inventory because it creates inventory remnants

The POQ rule reduces the amount of average on-hand inventory because it does a better job of matching order quantity to requirements

The L4L rule minimizes inventory investment, but it also maximizes the number of orders placed

Planning FactorsPlanning Factors

Page 32: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 44Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Planning FactorsPlanning Factors

Safety stock for dependent demand items with lumpy demand (gross requirements) is helpful only when future gross requirements, the timing or size of scheduled receipts, and the amount of scrap that will be produced are certain

Safety stock is used for end items and purchased items to protect against fluctuating customer orders and unreliable suppliers

Page 33: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 46Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Manufacturing resources plan

Performance reports

Outputs from MRPOutputs from MRP

Material requirements plan

Action notices Releasing new orders Adjusting due dates

Priority reports Dispatch lists Supplier schedules

Capacity reports Capacity requirements planning Finite capacity scheduling Input-output control

Cost and price data

MRP explosion

Routings and time

standards

Figure 15.15 – MRP Outputs

Page 34: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 47Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion

Translates the MPS and other sources of demand into the requirements needed for all of the subassemblies, components, and raw materials the firm needs to produce parent items

An item’s gross requirements are derived from three sources The MPS for immediate parents that are end items The planned order releases for parents below the MPS

level Any other requirements not originating in the MPS, such

as the demand for replacement parts

Page 35: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 48Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion

J(4)Seat-frame

boards

C(1)Seat

subassembly

H(1)Seat

frame

I(1)Seat

cushion

Figure 15.16 – BOM for the Seat Subassembly

Page 36: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 49Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Item: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units

Lead time: 2 weeks

Gross requirements 150

1

230

117

2 3

120

4 5

150

6

120

7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

37

Week

117 117

0 00 0

0 0 00 00 0

227 227 77 187 187

230230

230230

MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 37: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 50Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Item: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units

Lead time: 2 weeks

Gross requirements 150150

1 2 3

120120

4 5

150150

6

120120

7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

0 00 0

230

230

230

230

MRP ExplosionMRP Explosion

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 38: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 51Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

40

Week

00 00 00300 00 0

Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

0

Week

00 00 000 00 0

MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units

Lead time: 2 weeks

Gross requirements 150150

1 2 3

120120

4 5

150150

6

120120

7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

0 00 0

230

230

230

230

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 39: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 52Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

40

Week

00 00 00300 00 0

Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

0

Week

00 00 000 00 0

MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units

Lead time: 2 weeks

Gross requirements 150150

1 2 3

120120

4 5

150150

6

120120

7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

0 00 0

230

230

230

230

Usage quantity: 1 Usage quantity: 1

0 230 0 230

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 40: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 53Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

40

Week

00 00 00300 00 0

Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

0

Week

00 00 000 00 0

MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units

Lead time: 2 weeks

Gross requirements 150150

1 2 3

120120

4 5

150150

6

120120

7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

0 00 0

230

230

230

230

Usage quantity: 1 Usage quantity: 1

0 230 0 230 00 230000 2300

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 41: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 54Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat subassemblyLot size: 230 units

Lead time: 2 weeks

Gross requirements 150150

1 2 3

120120

4 5

150150

6

120120

7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

0 00 0

230

230

230

230

Item: Seat framesLot size: 300 units

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

40

Week

00 00 00300 00 0

Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Projected on-hand inventory

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

0

Week

00 00 000 00 0

0 230 0 230 00 230000 2300 00 00 0

4040 110110 110110 110 180 180 180 180

300

300

00 00 0

00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0

230

230

230

230

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 42: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 56Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

200

Week

00 00 000 00 0

Projected on-hand inventory

Item: Seat-frame boardsLot size: 1500 units

Lead time: 1 week

00 1200 00 000 00 0

MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat framesLot size: 300 units

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

300

300

Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

230

230

230

230

00 00 00 00230 2300 000 00 00 00230 2300 0

Usage quantity: 4

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 43: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 57Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

MRP ExplosionMRP ExplosionItem: Seat framesLot size: 300 units

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

300

300

Item: Seat cushionLot size: L4L

Lead time: 1 week

Gross requirements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

Week

230

230

230

230

00 00 00 00230 2300 000 00 00 00230 2300 0

Gross requirements

1

00

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Scheduled receipts

Planned receipts

Planned order releases

200

Week

00 00 000 00 0

Projected on-hand inventory

Item: Seat-frame boardsLot size: 1500 units

Lead time: 1 week

00 1200 00 000 00 0

200 200 200 500 500 500 500 500

1500

1500

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components

Page 44: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 58Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Other Important ReportsOther Important Reports

Action notice

Capacity requirements planning (CRP)

Theory of constraints principles can be applied to keep bottleneck operations fed by adjusting some lot sizing rules or occasionally overriding planned order releases

Priority reports

Manufacturing resource planning (MRP II)

Page 45: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 59Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

MRP and the EnvironmentMRP and the Environment

Consumer and government concern about the deterioration of the natural environment has driven manufacturers to reengineer their processes to become more environmentally friendly

Companies can modify their MRP systems to help track these waste and plans for their disposal

Page 46: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 66Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Resource Planning for Service Providers

Dependent demand for services Restaurants Airlines Hospitals Hotels

Bill of resources (BOR)

Page 47: 15 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Resource Planning 15 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.

15 – 67Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

(a)

Level 1Discharge

Level 2Intermediate care

Level 3Postoperative care

(Step down)

Level 4Postoperative care

(Intensive)

Level 7Preoperative care

(Testing)

Level 5Surgery

Level 6Preoperative care

(Angiogram)

(b)

Bill of ResourcesBill of Resources

Figure 15.18 – BOR for Treating an Aneurysm

Nurse(6 hr)

MD(1 hr)

Therapy(1 hr)

Bed(24 hr)

Lab(3 tests)

Kitchen(1 meal)

Pharmacy(10

medicines)

Level 6Preoperative care

(Angiogram)