15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
of 11
Transcript of 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
1/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 1
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [802.15.4 Multipath]
Date Submitted: [July 2004]
Source: [Paul Gorday] Company: [Motorola]
Address: [8000 W. Sunrise Blvd., Plantation, FL, 33322, USA]
Voice:[+1 561 723 4047], E-Mail:[[email protected]]
Re: [ IEEE 802.15.4 ]
Abstract: [This contribution presents simulated performance of a simple 802.15.4 (2.4 GHz PHY)
receiver in multipath channel conditions.]
Purpose: [To encourage discussion.]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for
discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this
document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the
right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property ofIEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
2/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 2
Motivation
Proposed modifications to 868/915 MHz PHY
consider additional multipath tolerance for long-
range applications.
Provide benchmark simulation results for the 2.4
GHz PHY, which would also apply to the
proposed down-banded version.
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
3/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 3
2.4 GHz PHY Simulation
Floating point simulation of optimum non-coherent
demodulator.
Detection based on largest correlation peak (largest path) No RAKE or equalizer.
Assume channel is constant throughout packet (quasi-
static) and uncorrelated from packet to packet.
Record average packet error rate (PER) vs. Eb/No.
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
4/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 4
2.4 GHz Channel Model
No channel model was specified by 802.15.4
Commonly used diffuse exponential model
802.11 Handbook [1]
802.15.3a Narrowband Model [2]
ETSI BRAN, HIPERLAN/2 [3]
Many textbooks [e.g., 4]
Detailed channel models are being developed by 802.15.4afor a variety of environments, but are not finished.
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
5/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 5
Diffuse Exponential Model
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25 Diffuseeach delay bin
contains multipath energy
Exponentialaverage power
decays exponentially
Fading - each delay bin has
independent Rayleigh fading
Single Parameter:- RMS delay spread = - Mean excess delay
- Max excess delay (10 dB) 2.5
- Max excess delay (20 dB) 5k (Bin #)
NormalizedAveragePower 0,)(
/
kCekf s
kT
C = Normalization Constant
Ts = Simulation Sample Period
Depicted: = 4Ts
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
6/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 4010
-3
10-2
10-1
100
Eb/No (dB)
PER
No Fading
= 0 ns
= 100 ns
= 200 ns
= 300 ns
= 400 ns
= 500 ns
Results for 2.4 GHz PHY
Acceptable performance
for 400 ns
RMS delay spread = 400 ns
Mean excess delay 400 nsMax excess delay (10 dB) 1 s
Max excess delay (20 dB) 2 s
Results scale with chip rate
half-rate at 915 MHz would
tolerate RMS delay spreads
up to 800 ns
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
7/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 7
802.11a/HIPERLAN/2 Models [3]
Channel EnvironmentRMS Delay
Spread (ns)
A Typical office (NLOS) 50B Typical large open space (NLOS) 100
C Large open space indoor (NLOS) 150
D Large open space indoor/outdoor (LOS) 140
E Large open space outdoor (NLOS) 250
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
8/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 8
IEEE 802.11 Handbook[1]
EnvironmentRMS Delay
Spread (ns)
Typical Home < 50
Typical Office ~ 100
Typical Manufacturing 200-300
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
9/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 9
Factory/Office Measurements [4]
Tx-Rx separation < 30 m
Location Type
Mean RMS
Delay Spread
(ns)
Max RMS
Delay Spread
(ns)
A Factory 16 40
B Factory 29 60
C Factory 52 152
D Factory 73 150
E Factory 33 146
F Office 16 48
G Office 39 55
H Office 55 146
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
10/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 10
Conclusions
802.15.4 (2.4 GHz PHY) with simple non-coherent demodulator can tolerate RMS delayspreads up to 400 ns sufficient for most WLAN
applications, more than enough for WPANapplications.
Down-banded, half-rate 2.4 GHz PHY wouldtolerate RMS delay spreads up to 800 ns.
Additional delay spread tolerance may beachievable with some increase in demodulatorcomplexity.
-
7/30/2019 15-04-0337-00-004b-802-15-4-multipath_2
11/11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-04-0337-00-004b
Submission
July 2004
Paul Gorday, MotorolaSlide 11
References
[1] B. OHara and A. Petrick,IEEE 802.11 HandbookA
Designers Companion, IEEE Press, 1999.
[2] J. Foester, Channel Modeling Sub-committee Report
(Final), IEEE P802.15-02/490r1-SG3a, Feb. 2003.
[3] J. Medbo and P. Schramm, Channel Models for
HIPERLAN/2, ETSI/BRAN doc. No. 3ERI085B, 1998.
[4] K. Pahlavan and A. Levesque, Wireless Information
Networks, John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
