147.full.pdf

download 147.full.pdf

of 9

Transcript of 147.full.pdf

  • REVIEW

    p

    aMo

    m

    llwn

    rea

    or

    studies showed that either, free or total, triiodothyronine or thyroxine was lower in the group of

    Introduction

    Thyroid hormones padaptation of metabolillness (1). In hospitaalterations are very cincreased age or in thotriiodothyronine (T3) is

    rather than T3, and increased catabolism of T3

    European Journal of Endocrinology (2011) 164 147155 ISSN 0804-4643

    DOI: 10.1530/EJE-10-0695q 2011 European Society of Endocrinologyto 3,3-diiodothyronine (T2) (46). With increasingseverity of illness, low total and free T4, and sometimeslow TSH, can be observed (6). Decrease in plasmaT4-binding globulin (TBG) or transthyretin as well asaccumulation of substances that lower the plasmathyroid hormone-binding capacity appear also to beimportant for the above-mentioned alterations inthyroid hormone levels during critical illness (4).

    For the vast majority of patients, thyroid functionabnormalities observed during critical illness are

    Methods

    Data sources

    To identify studies eligible for inclusion in this review,we searched PubMed, on February 1, 2009, applyingthe following combined search term: (thyroid diseaseOR thyroid OR hypothyroidism OR hyperthyroidism ORTSH OR T4 OR T3 OR thyroid hormones) AND (infectionOR sepsis OR bacteremia OR pneumonia OR nosocomialgroup of patients, which can be attributed to increaseddeiodination of thyroxine (T4) to reverse T3 (rT3),patients with sepsis or septic shock who had unfavorable outcome than in those who had favorableoutcome. Two other studies showed higher TSH values in the group of patients with unfavorableoutcome. No significant relevant findings were observed in the remaining study. Regarding thecorrelation of sepsis prognostic scoring systems with thyroid function tests, the three studies thatprovided specific relevant data showed variable findings.Discussion: Most of the relevant studies identified favor the concept that decreased thyroid function atbaseline might be associated with a worse outcome of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Althoughthese findings are not consistent, the role of thyroid function in affecting or merely predicting theoutcome of sepsis or septic shock merits further investigation.

    European Journal of Endocrinology 164 147155

    lay an important role in theic function to stress and criticallized patients, thyroid hormoneommon, particularly in those ofse with critical illness (2, 3). Lowcommonly observed in the latter

    transient and do not represent an underlying thyroiddisease (7). Still, certain data suggest that themagnitude of thyroid hormone alterations in patientsadmitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to variouscauses is associated adversely with the patient outcome(811). In this review, we sought to evaluate system-atically the association between baseline thyroidfunction and the outcome of patients with, specifically,sepsis or septic shock.Association between thyroid funthe outcome of patients with sea systematic reviewAnna G Angelousi1, Drosos E Karageorgopoulos1, Anast1Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 2311526 Athens, Greece and 3Department of Medicine, Tufts University Scho

    (Correspondence should be addressed to M E Falagas at Alfa Institute of Bio

    Abstract

    Introduction: The severity of critical iabnormalities. We sought to evaluateshock is associated with the thyroid fucare unit (ICU).Methods: We performed a systematicResults: We included nine studies thatneonates, and two involved adults. Mlength of ICU stay was evaluated in theness is associated with various patterns of thyroid hormonehether the outcome of patients with, specifically, sepsis or septicction tests evaluated at diagnosis or admission in the intensive

    view of relevant studies by searching PubMed.ll had a prospective cohort design. Seven involved children or

    rtality was the outcome evaluated in eight studies, while theemaining study. In univariate analysis, six of the nine includedction tests at baseline andsis or septic shock:

    sios M Kapaskelis1,2 and Matthew E Falagas1,2,3

    arousi, Athens, Greece, 2Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital,l of Medicine, Boston 02153, Massachusetts, USA

    edical Sciences (AIBS); Email: [email protected])Online version via www.eje-online.org

  • infection OR septic shock). The bibliographies of

    cohort studies (either prospective or retrospective) or

    Results

    Characteristics of the included studies

    exclusively neonates (12, 16), and the remaining two

    In Table 1, we present data on the association between

    Specifically, six of the nine studies included in thisreview showed, by univariate analysis, that amongpatients with sepsis or septic shock those with anunfavorable outcome had lower baseline serum levels of,either total or free, T3 or T4, than those with a favorableoutcome (1216, 19). In two other studies that involvedchildren and adults, who in both studies were admittedin the ICU due to septic shock, there was no difference inbaseline T3 or T4 between non-survivors and survivors

    Articles excluded after detailedscreening according to specific

    criteria(n=193)

    Articles focusing on the association of thyroid function with other than sepsis/septic shock types of critical illness or with infections without sepsis/septic shock (n=42) Animal studies (n=51) Articles that did not give data for the outcome of patients with altered thyroid function (n=3) Review articles (n=64) Studies that provided data for thyroid function tests that did not refer to baseline (n=2) Case reports: (n=6) Articles studying other than thyroid hormones (e.g. adrenal hormones) (n=25)

    9 individual articles qualifyingfor inclusion in our review

    Figure 1 Flow diagram of the detailed process of the selection ofarticles for inclusion in our review.

    148 A G Angelousi and others EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164serum thyroid hormone levels at baseline and theoutcome of patients with sepsis or septic shock.studies involved adults (18, 19). Mortality was theoutcome evaluated in eight of the studies (1, 1219),while in the remaining study, the outcome evaluated wasthe length of stay in the pediatric ICU (PICU) (13). In six ofthe included studies, it was specifically reported that theblood samples for thyroid hormone measurements weretaken before administration of dopamine (1, 1216, 19).

    Association of thyroid hormones at baselinewith outcomeFrom the literature searches that we performed inPubMed, we retrieved a total of 3633 articles. After firstscreening, based on the title and the abstract, we selected202 articles for further detailed evaluation, after which,we identified nine studies as eligible for inclusion in thisreview (1219). The process of selecting articles forinclusion in this review is depicted graphically in Fig. 1.

    All of the nine included studies had a prospec-tive cohort design. Five of the studies involved children(1, 1315, 17), two additional studies involvedclinical trials that provided data on the associationbetween thyroid hormones at baseline and the outcomeof patients of any age with sepsis or septic shock. Weconsidered baseline thyroid function tests as thosereferring to the time of diagnosis of sepsis or the time ofadmission in the ICU. We specifically evaluated English,French, German, Italian, and Spanish language articles.

    Data extraction

    Data extracted from each of the included studies werethose referring to the study design, the characteristicsof the study population and the subgroups of patientscompared, the baseline values of thyroid hormones,and their statistical association with the patientoutcome through univariate or multivariate analysis,where reported. We also extracted data on thecorrelation of the thyroid hormones at baseline withsepsis prognostic scores.relevant articles were also hand searched. We per-formed an updated PubMed search on October 1, 2010.

    Study selection criteria

    We selected for inclusion in our review, casecontrol orwww.eje-online.orgArticles selected for furtherevaluation after first screening of

    title and abstract (n=202)

    Potentially relevant articlesretrieved from PubMed

    (n=3633)

  • Table1

    Ass

    ocia

    tion

    betw

    een

    baselin

    eth

    yro

    idhorm

    ones

    and

    outc

    om

    eof

    patients

    with

    sepsis

    or

    septic

    shock

    indiff

    ere

    nt

    stu

    die

    s.

    Study

    Study

    design

    Characteristics

    ofwholestudy

    population

    Comparisonof

    patientgroups

    (unfa

    vora

    ble

    vers

    us

    favora

    ble

    outc

    om

    e),n

    Agein

    years,

    median

    (range)or

    meanG

    S.D.

    Sex

    (male

    s/

    tota

    l)

    Valuesofthyroid

    horm

    onesin

    thecomparedgroups

    Comparisonin

    univariate

    analysis

    Comparisonin

    multivariate

    analysis

    Thyro

    idhorm

    one

    levels

    ,units

    Unfa

    vora

    ble

    outc

    om

    e

    Favora

    ble

    outc

    om

    eS

    ignifi

    cance

    Sig

    ni-

    ficance

    Variable

    s

    ente

    red

    in

    the

    model

    Independent

    pre

    dic

    tor

    variable

    s

    (12)

    Pro

    spective

    case

    contr

    ol

    stu

    dy

    Cases:

    143

    new

    born

    s

    adm

    itte

    din

    PIC

    U

    with

    sepsis

    due

    to

    Staphylococcusaureus,

    Streptococcuspneumoniae,

    Escherichiacoli,Klebsiella

    pneumoniae,Pseudomonas

    aeruginosa,Klebsiella

    oxytoca

    Contr

    ols

    :149

    healthy

    new

    born

    s

    Sepsis

    non-

    surv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    sepsis

    surv

    i-

    vors

    ,20

    vs

    123

    All

    were

    term

    -or

    pre

    term

    -

    neonate

    s

    72/1

    43

    T3,

    ng/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    T4,

    ng/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    TS

    H,

    mIU

    /l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    112.8G

    51.0

    5.9G

    1.5

    2.2G

    1.4

    172.2G

    61.5

    7.1G

    2.3

    4.1G

    2.1

    P!

    0.0

    01

    P!

    0.0

    1

    P!

    0.0

    1

    P!

    0.0

    01

    aN

    AE

    uth

    yroid

    sick

    syn-

    dro

    me

    (1)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Tw

    enty

    -four

    child

    ren

    adm

    itte

    din

    PIC

    Uw

    ith

    septic

    shock

    due

    to

    pulm

    onary

    ,C

    NS

    ,or

    GI

    infe

    c-

    tions

    due

    tobacte

    rem

    iaby

    Escherichiacoli

    orStrepto-

    coccuspneumoniae

    or

    Staphylococcusaureus

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    surv

    i-

    vors

    ,12

    vs

    12

    313/2

    4T

    3,

    ng/d

    l

    (media

    n(9

    5%

    CI)

    )

    T4,mg/d

    l

    (media

    n(9

    5%

    CI)

    )

    fT3,

    pg/m

    l

    (media

    n(9

    5%

    CI)

    )

    fT4,

    ng/d

    l

    (media

    n(9

    5%

    CI)

    )

    TS

    H,mIU

    /ml

    (media

    n(9

    5%

    CI)

    )

    40

    (40.0

    040.2

    3)b

    4.4

    5(1

    .96.0

    )b

    1.8

    5(0

    .570.9

    5)b

    0.7

    7(0

    .570.9

    5)b

    1.2

    1(0

    .272.9

    6)

    0.2

    6(0

    .220.8

    8)

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    PZ

    0.0

    4

    NA

    NA

    NA

    (13)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Fort

    y-f

    our

    child

    ren

    inP

    ICU

    who

    surv

    ived

    from

    menin

    gococcal

    septic

    shock

    (31

    had

    menin

    -

    gococcem

    ia)

    Patients

    with

    long

    vers

    us

    short

    PIC

    Usta

    yc,

    11

    vs

    33

    2.5

    (0.1

    15.7

    )vs

    5(0

    .316.1

    )

    6/1

    1vs

    21/3

    3

    T3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (geom

    etr

    ic

    meanG

    S.E

    .M.)

    T4,

    nm

    ol/l

    (geom

    etr

    ic

    meanG

    S.E

    .M.)

    fT4,

    pm

    ol/l

    (geom

    etr

    ic

    meanG

    S.E

    .M.)

    rT3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (geom

    etr

    ic

    meanG

    S.E

    .M.)

    T3/r

    T3

    (geom

    etr

    ic

    meanG

    S.E

    .M.)

    TS

    H,

    mIU

    /l

    (geom

    etr

    ic

    meanG

    S.E

    .M.)

    0.2

    4(0

    .200.2

    8)d

    Low

    in50%

    ,

    Hig

    hin

    50%

    ,

    Hig

    h

    Low

    Norm

    al

    0.3

    8(0

    .360.4

    0)d

    norm

    alin

    50%

    norm

    alin

    50%

    PZ

    0.0

    22

    (rZK

    0.3

    5)e

    NS

    (rZK

    0.3

    7)e

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    P!

    0.0

    5

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    Dopam

    ine

    adm

    inis

    -

    tration,

    T4

    on

    adm

    is-

    sio

    n,

    IL6

    on

    adm

    is-

    sio

    n,

    age,

    gender,

    tim

    eto

    firs

    t

    pete

    chia

    IL6,

    T4

    Thyroid function and sepsis outcome 149EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164

    www.eje-online.org

  • Table1Continued

    Study

    Study

    design

    Characteristics

    ofwholestudy

    population

    Comparisonof

    patientgroups

    (unfa

    vora

    ble

    vers

    us

    favora

    ble

    outc

    om

    e),n

    Agein

    years,

    median

    (range)or

    meanG

    S.D.

    Sex

    (male

    s/

    tota

    l)

    Valuesofthyroid

    horm

    onesin

    thecomparedgroups

    Comparisonin

    univariate

    analysis

    Comparisonin

    multivariate

    analysis

    Thyro

    idhorm

    one

    levels

    ,units

    Unfa

    vora

    ble

    outc

    om

    e

    Favora

    ble

    outc

    om

    eS

    ignifi

    cance

    Sig

    ni-

    ficance

    Variable

    s

    ente

    red

    in

    the

    model

    Independent

    pre

    dic

    tor

    variable

    s

    (14)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Fort

    y-fi

    ve

    child

    ren

    adm

    itte

    din

    PIC

    Uw

    ith

    menin

    gococcal

    sepsis

    or

    septic

    shock

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    septic

    shock

    surv

    ivors

    and

    sepsis

    surv

    ivors

    ,8

    vs

    30

    and

    7

    1.1

    (0.5

    9.4

    )vs

    4.3

    (0.1

    16.1

    )and

    6.1

    (2.3

    12.2

    )

    (P!

    0.0

    5)

    7/8

    vs

    19/3

    0

    vs

    4/7

    T3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    T4,

    nm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    fT4,

    pm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    rT3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    T3/r

    T3

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    TS

    H,

    mIU

    /l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    TB

    G,

    mg/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    0.4

    9(0

    .340.6

    1)

    38

    (2546)

    15

    (1321)

    0.7

    5(0

    .551.2

    1)

    0.7

    1(0

    .330.8

    0)

    0.8

    8(0

    .521.1

    4)

    9(6

    10)

    0.4

    0(0

    .300.5

    2)

    and

    0.4

    5(0

    .420.6

    1)

    56

    (4973)

    and

    86

    (6892)

    18

    (1520)

    and

    19

    (1420)

    1.4

    0(1

    .111.7

    3)

    and

    1.1

    7(1

    .001.2

    8)

    0.3

    0(0

    .200.4

    4)

    and

    0.4

    1(0

    .360.5

    8)

    0.8

    4(0

    .591.1

    8)

    and

    0.8

    0(0

    .651.6

    1)

    12

    (1015),

    and

    18

    (1419)

    NS

    and

    NS

    P!

    0.0

    5and

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    and

    NS

    P!

    0.0

    5and

    P!

    0.0

    5

    P!

    0.0

    5and

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    P!

    0.0

    5and

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    NS

    T4,fT

    4,T

    3,rT

    3,

    T3/r

    T3,T

    S-

    H,T

    BG

    ,

    age,gen-

    der,

    cort

    i-

    sol,

    NE

    FA

    /alb

    u-

    min

    ratio

    ,

    time

    tofir

    st

    pete

    chia

    ,

    IL6

    IL6

    (15)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Seventy

    -tw

    ochild

    ren

    adm

    itte

    din

    the

    PIC

    Uw

    ith

    sepsis

    or

    septic

    shock

    due

    tobacte

    rem

    iaby

    Pseudomonasaeruginosa,

    Klebsiella

    pneumoniae,Sta-

    phylococcusaureus,

    or

    Escherichiacoli

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    surv

    ivors

    ,

    26

    vs

    46

    Sepsis

    cases:

    2.5G

    2.3

    ,septic

    shock

    cases:

    3.0G

    2.3

    35/7

    2T

    3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    T4,

    nm

    ol/l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    fT3,

    pm

    ol/l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    fT4,

    pm

    ol/l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    TS

    H,

    mIU

    /l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    0.5

    8G

    0.1

    6

    64.5G

    15.8

    0.0

    16G

    0.0

    04

    12.7

    7G

    3.2

    2

    4.2G

    2.2

    1.0

    0G

    0.1

    6

    105.7

    8G

    19.3

    5

    0.0

    30G

    0.0

    05

    20.6

    4G

    3.4

    8

    4.9G

    2.1

    P!

    0.0

    01

    P!

    0.0

    01

    P!

    0.0

    01

    P!

    0.0

    01

    NS

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    (16)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Fort

    y-n

    ine

    neonate

    sw

    ith

    sepsis

    (docum

    ente

    dbacte

    rem

    iain

    11

    and

    menin

    gitis

    in8)

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    surv

    ivors

    ,

    16

    vs

    33

    0.7

    3G

    0.0

    3N

    DT

    3,

    ng/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    T4,mg/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    TS

    H,mIU

    /ml

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    57.7G

    21.1

    4.6G

    3.1

    9.0G

    13.4

    116.5G

    50.6

    7.3G

    4.0

    9.6G

    10.5

    P!

    0.0

    01

    P!

    0.0

    1

    NS

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    (17)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Tw

    enty

    -six

    child

    ren

    adm

    itte

    din

    PIC

    Uw

    ith

    sepsis

    due

    tobac-

    tere

    mia

    byNeisseriameningi-

    tidis

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    surv

    ivors

    ,

    8vs

    18

    0.8

    3vs

    2.4

    (P!

    0.0

    5)

    16/2

    6T

    3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    T4,

    nm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    fT4,

    pm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    rT3,

    nm

    ol/l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    T3/r

    T3,

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    TS

    H,

    mE

    /l

    (media

    n(I

    QR

    ))

    0.5

    3(0

    .430.7

    6)

    38

    (2546)

    14

    (1321)

    0.7

    5(0

    .550.9

    7)

    0.7

    6(0

    .640.8

    5)

    0.9

    7(0

    .521.5

    6)

    0.3

    8(0

    .260.4

    2)

    44

    (3956)

    16

    (1519)

    1.4

    4(0

    .991.8

    5)

    0.4

    3(0

    .170.3

    5)

    0.2

    9(0

    .150.5

    4)

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    NS

    P!

    0.0

    1

    P!

    0.0

    1

    P!

    0.0

    1

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    (18)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Tw

    enty

    -seven

    adults

    adm

    itte

    din

    the

    ICU

    with

    septic

    shock

    due

    topneum

    onia

    ,perito

    nitis

    ,

    urinary

    tract

    infe

    ction,

    or

    bac-

    tere

    mia

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    surv

    ivors

    ,

    12

    vs

    15

    50G

    19

    18/2

    7T

    3,

    ng/m

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    T4,

    ng/m

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    TS

    H,mIU

    /ml

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    0.0

    38G

    0.1

    9

    46.1G

    19.7

    0.4

    4G

    0.6

    1

    0.0

    38G

    0.1

    6

    44.6G

    9.7

    0.7

    9G

    0.6

    8

    NS

    NS

    PZ

    0.1

    8(N

    S)

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    150 A G Angelousi and others EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164

    www.eje-online.org

  • (1, 18). In the remaining study, which evaluatedTable1Continued

    Study

    Study

    design

    Characteristics

    ofwholestudy

    population

    Comparisonof

    patientgroups

    (unfa

    vora

    ble

    vers

    us

    favora

    ble

    outc

    om

    e),n

    Agein

    years,

    median

    (range)or

    meanG

    S.D.

    Sex

    (male

    s/

    tota

    l)

    Valuesofthyroid

    horm

    onesin

    thecomparedgroups

    Comparisonin

    univariate

    analysis

    Comparisonin

    multivariate

    analysis

    Thyro

    idhorm

    one

    levels

    ,units

    Unfa

    vora

    ble

    outc

    om

    e

    Favora

    ble

    outc

    om

    eS

    ignifi

    cance

    Sig

    ni-

    ficance

    Variable

    s

    ente

    red

    in

    the

    model

    Independent

    pre

    dic

    tor

    variable

    s

    (19)

    Pro

    spective

    cohort

    stu

    dy

    Thirty

    -seven

    adults

    with

    sepsis

    Non-s

    urv

    ivors

    vers

    us

    surv

    ivors

    ,

    15

    vs

    22

    57.6G

    17.8

    37/3

    7T

    3,

    ng/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    T4,mg/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    fT4I,

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    rT3,

    ng/d

    l

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    TS

    H,mIU

    /ml

    (meanG

    S.D

    .)

    30.4

    0G

    13.4

    0

    5.5

    0G

    1.7

    0

    3.4

    7G

    0.8

    9

    41.2

    0G

    18.2

    0

    1.8

    5G

    0.8

    1

    52.5G

    19.6

    0

    7.2

    0G

    2.8

    0

    4.5

    3G

    1.7

    9

    40.8

    0G

    12.9

    0

    1.8

    6G

    0.6

    8

    P!

    0.0

    01

    P!

    0.0

    5

    P!

    0.0

    5

    NS

    NS

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    NA

    (P)I

    CU

    ,(p

    edia

    tric

    )in

    tensiv

    ecare

    unit;

    GI,

    gastr

    oin

    testinal

    tract;

    (f/r

    )T

    3,

    (fre

    e/r

    evers

    e)

    triio

    doth

    yro

    nin

    e;

    fT4(I

    ),fr

    ee

    thyro

    xin

    e(index);

    TB

    G,

    thyro

    xin

    e-b

    indin

    gglo

    bulin

    ;IQ

    R,

    inte

    rquart

    ilera

    nge;

    CI,

    confidence

    inte

    rval;

    NS

    ,non-s

    ignifi

    cant;

    NA

    ,non-a

    vaila

    ble

    ;N

    EF

    A,

    non-e

    ste

    rified

    fatt

    yacid

    levelin

    the

    alb

    um

    infr

    action

    of

    blo

    od

    seru

    m.

    aB

    ym

    ultiv

    ariate

    analy

    sis

    euth

    yro

    idsic

    ksyndro

    me

    was

    rela

    ted

    by

    augm

    ente

    dm

    ort

    alit

    y(P!

    0.0

    01).

    bV

    alu

    es

    for

    the

    whole

    stu

    dy

    popula

    tion.

    cS

    hort

    PIC

    Usta

    ycases

    was

    defined

    as!

    7days

    and

    long

    sta

    yas

    more

    than

    7days.

    dC

    Iextr

    acte

    dfr

    om

    gra

    phs.

    er,

    Spearm

    ans

    corr

    ela

    tion

    coeffi

    cie

    nt.

    Thyroid function and sepsis outcome 151EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164children with meningococcal sepsis admitted to thePICU, those who did not survive had higher baselineserum levels of T3 than those who survived, while nodifference was detected in the total and free T4 levels(17). In this study, non-survivors also had higherbaseline levels of TSH.

    Higher baseline TSH values in non-survivors werealso observed in another study that evaluated childrenwith septic shock admitted to the PICU. This study didnot demonstrate differences in the levels of T3 or T4between non-survivors and survivors (1). On thecontrary, lower baseline TSH was associated withhigher mortality in a study that evaluated septicneonates admitted in the ICU (12); this was alsoaccompanied with lower T3 and T4. The baseline TSHlevels in the remaining six studies did not differbetween patients with an unfavorable outcomecompared with those with a favorable outcome. Inaddition, a lower rT3 value and a higher T3/rT3 ratiowere associated with an adverse outcome in twostudies (14, 17), whereas non-significant findings wereobserved in the other two studies that assessed thesame parameters (13, 19).

    Three of the included studies further evaluated theabove-described associations in multivariate analysis.One of these studies showed that in pediatric patientswho survived meningococcal septic shock, lowerbaseline serum T4 was an independent predictor ofan unfavorable outcome, specifically prolonged ICUstay (13). The baseline interleukin 6 (IL6) level wasalso independently associated with this outcome. Thelength of ICU stay was estimated to increase by 15%for every doubling of the IL6 concentration and 16%for every 10 nmol/l decrease in the T4 level (13). Thesecond study that included pediatric ICU patients withmeningococcal sepsis or septic shock showed that theeffect of the thyroid function tests on mortality lostsignificance in the multivariate analysis, and that IL6was the only independent predictor of this outcome(14). In the remaining study, which was performed onnewborns admitted to the ICU with bacterial sepsis,the presence of euthyroid sick syndrome was indepen-dently associated with mortality (12).

    In Table 2, we present data on the correlation ofthyroid function tests at baseline with various sepsisprognostic scores. Such associations were reported inthree of the nine included studies, which all evaluatedchildren with meningococcal sepsis or septic shockadmitted to the PICU (13, 14, 17). In one of thesestudies, both the pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM)score and the sequential organ failure assessment scorehad a moderate negative correlation with the baselineT4 value (14). In another study, the PRISM score had arather weak positive correlation with baseline TSH (17).In the remaining study, no significant relevant associ-ations were observed (13).www.eje-online.org

  • Table 2 Correlation between baseline thyroid hormones and sepsis prognostic scores in patients with sepsis or septic shock included in

    r

    linti

    152 A G Angelousi and others EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164Discussion

    The majority (six out of nine) of the evaluated relevantstudies showed that lower baseline thyroid hormonevalues, either T3 or T4, are associated with worseoutcome for patients with sepsis or septic shock. Theabove observations apply mainly to children rather thanto adults, as the latter group was evaluated in only twoof the included studies. Still, definite conclusions on theabove issue cannot be drawn on the basis of the dataavailable herein, as the associations observed were notalways consistent between the included studies, orwithin each study with regard to different thyroidfunction tests evaluated. Moreover, the association ofthyroid hormones at baseline and the outcome ofpatients with sepsis or septic shock was not commonlyevaluated in appropriate multivariate models to adjustfor the effect of potential confounders.

    It is interesting that one of the included studiesshowed that, among the 26 children with meningo-coccal sepsis studied, the 18 who survived had lower T3levels at PICU admission than the 8 who did not survive(17). This finding stands in contrast to the rest of the

    different studies.

    Study

    Baseline sepsis prognosticscore, median (range) ormeanGS.D. (patients withunfavorable versusfavorable outcome)

    Cor

    T3

    (13) PRISM: 24 (1246) vs20 (935)

    NS

    (14) PRISM: 32 (2343) vs(21 (835) and 9 (513))

    NS

    SOFA: 15 (1319) vs(9 (317) and 2 (06))

    (17) PRISM: 31 (2934) vs17 (1417)

    rZ0.29(NS)

    fT3, free triiodothyronine; fT4, free thyroxine; TBG, thyroxine-binding globuassessment score; APACHE, acute physiologic and chronic health evaluacorrelation-coefficient.included studies, which either showed the opposite orno relevant association. One potential explanation forthe discordant findings of the study in this regard is thatten of the survivors received treatment with dopamine,whereas the non-survivors received norepinephrine ordobutamine. Dopamine can suppress the pituitaryrelease of TSH and thus potentially the production ofT3 (20), while norepinephrine is believed to stimulatethe secretion of TSH (21). Notably, the non-survivors inthis study also had higher TSH levels (17). Yet, it wasnot specifically stated whether dopamine adminis-tration preceded the collection of blood samples for thethyroid hormone measurements. However, in the greatmajority of the remaining studies, thyroid hormonemeasurements were performed prior to dopamine use(1, 1215, 19).

    www.eje-online.orgIn addition, in the study, in which higher T3 levelswere observed in non-survivors of meningococcal septicshock, the age of the non-survivors was significantlylower than that of the survivors (10 vs 29 monthsrespectively) (17). The changes that occur in thyroidhormone levels during the first month of life could, atleast in part, account for the differences in the T3 levelsobserved in this study. Specifically in neonates, theplasma thyroid hormone levels are typically elevatedcompared with those in older children (22). This isrelated to the TSH surge that occurs in the immediatepostnatal period and to the elevated TBG levelssecondary to maternal estrogen (22). In normal termneonates, the total and free T4 levels fall gradually overthe next 46 weeks but remain higher than in olderchildren and adults for a few months. The T3 levelsgradually reach those of infancy, between 2 and 12weeks of life (22, 23). In early neonatal life, there hasalso been observed an increased activity of type IIIdeiodinase (D3) enzyme with secondary increase in rT3levels and increase in the degradation of T3 to T2, whichreaches the adult range during the fourth postnatalmonth (22, 23).

    elation of thyroid hormones with sepsis prognostic score

    T4 fT3 fT4 TSH TBG

    NS NS NS NS NS

    rZK0.62(P!0.05)

    NS NS NS rZK0.54(P!0.05)

    rZK0.69(P!0.05)

    rZK0.57(P!0.05)

    rZK0.34(NS)

    ND rZK0.41(NS)

    rZ0.42(P!0.05)

    ND

    ; PRISM, pediatric risk of mortality score; SOFA, sequential organ failureon score; NS, non-significant; ND, no data were reported; r, SpearmansIt is questionable whether the findings of our reviewcan be applicable to adult patients with sepsis or septicshock, who were evaluated in only two of the includedstudies. Relevant data suggest that children havedifferent hemodynamic responses to critical illness andseptic shock. Children more commonly suffer fromprogressive cardiac failure than adults and can respondto inotropic therapy (24). Mortality in pediatric septicshock is usually lower than in adults (24).

    It is generally accepted that the alterations in thyroidhormones observed during critical illness constitute partof an adaptive metabolic response. This is based on thefinding that the great majority of patients recover normalthyroid function after the critical illness subsides (25). Ithas also been suggested that the decrease in metabolicfunction observed during the systemic inflammatoryresponse syndrome and the accompanying multiorgan

  • dysfunction may help protect cell survival (26). Still, antigen (38, 39). These actions can include the

    of TSH (40). It has thus been hypothesized that the

    Thyroid function and sepsis outcome 153EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164thyroid disorders are relatively common in the generalpopulation, with an estimated prevalence of 110% (27).The presence of even subclinical abnormalities might beimportant (28), as subclinical hypothyroidism has beenlinked to excess mortality in certain patient groups (28,29). Some studies have also found that a subset ofpatients with critical illness can have true hypothyroid-ism (11). High TSH or reduced rT3 can be suggestive ofsuch a diagnosis (11, 30). Thus, the findings of some ofthe studies included in our review that higher TSH, lowerrT3, or lower T3 and T4 are associated with anunfavorable outcome of patients with sepsis or septicshock could imply that, at least for a minority of thesepatients, thyroid hypofunction during sepsis or septicshock might influence per se the outcome of thiscondition. This hypothesis merits further evaluation inappropriately designed studies.

    Some studies performed in animal models of sepsis orseptic shock support the hypothesis that relative thyroidinsufficiency is associated with a worse outcome. Forexample, lower baseline serum T4 and free T4 have beenassociated with decreased likelihood for survival inseverely ill dogs (puppies) with parvoviral diarrhea (31).In an experimental sepsis model in rats, those that werepreviously thyroidectomized showed abolishment of thehyperdynamic response that physiologically accom-panies early-stage sepsis. In the thyroidectomizedanimals (32), it was observed that the administrationof T4 reversed the decrease in survival.

    Another experimental study in rats showed thatthyroid hormone supplementation during sepsis canincrease survival (33). A particular beneficial effect ofthyroid hormone administration in rats with experimen-tally induced sepsis has been documented on lungmechanics and histology, which was mainly attributedto enhanced synthesis of surfactant (34, 35). Still, otherstudies on experimentally induced sepsis have failed toshow a benefit of thyroid hormone replacement (7, 32,36). In humans, there is little evidence regarding thyroidhormone substitution during critical illness. Of note, somerelevant clinical studies have suggested that T4 supple-mentation can lead to reduction in the needs forvasoactive drug administration in circulatory shock (37).

    Thyroid hormone supplementation during sepsis orseptic shock can lead to a reciprocal decrease in TSH.This issue needs particular attention, as there appears tobe a rather complex pathophysiological interplaybetween TSH and the immune system. Specifically,TSH has been shown to affect the function of varioustypes of hematopoietic and immune system cells thatexpress the TSH receptor (38, 39). Such cells mainlyinclude subsets of hematopoietic cells in the bonemarrow, as well as peripheral monocytes, dendriticcells, and T-lymphocytes. Furthermore, some of theabove cell types can produce biologically active TSH thatcan have autocrine and paracrine actions, which caninfluence the early stages of the immune response to animmune system cells can affect the systemic thyroidhormone activity.

    It is debatable whether the data included in ourreview regarding the association between thyroidfunction and sepsis or septic shock can be extrapolatedto other types of critical illness. Several inflammatorycytokines, such as IL1b, IL6, and TNF-a, can suppress,via direct or indirect pathways, the thyroid function atdifferent levels (41, 42). In sepsis, the increase in theproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines is morepronounced than that in other types of critical illness(43, 44). In this respect, baseline levels of thyroidhormones, including T4, T3, and TSH, can be substan-tially lower in septic patients than in non-septic patientswith critical illness of similar severity (45). The degreeof endothelial activation and dysfunction can also begreater in sepsis than in other types of critical illness,as reflected by higher levels of E-selectin, intercellularadhesion molecule-1, and von Willebrand factoractivity that have been observed in some studies(43, 44, 46).

    The findings of our review regarding the associationbetween thyroid hormone abnormalities and the out-come of patients with sepsis or septic shock indicate thatthese abnormalities could be of prognostic value. In thestudies included in our review, the association betweenestablished sepsis prognostic systems and baselinethyroid hormones was at the most moderate. Thus,the prognostic value of thyroid hormones may beindependent of other prognostic markers. Likewise,other studies performed in critically ill patients haveshown that taking into consideration the baselinethyroid function tests can add to the predictive capacityof the APACHE score (11, 47).

    In conclusion, the majority of the identified studiesthat evaluated the baseline thyroid function tests inpatients with sepsis or septic shock provide data thatfavor the existence of an association between lower T3 orT4 and worse outcome. Since thyroid hormone abnorm-alities are very common in septic patients, future studiesshould aim to more clearly establish the strength of theabove-mentioned association or even examine whethera causal relationship between thyroid hypofunction andadverse outcome exists. The role of the thyroid hormoneabnormalities as predictors of outcome of septic patientson top of the known risk prognostic scoring systemswarrants also further evaluation.

    Declaration of interest

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could beperceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the review reported.regulation of the synthesis and release of mediators ofinflammation, such as IL6 and tumor necrosis factor-a(TNF-a). Various immune system cells have also beenfound to express T3, a process that is under the influencewww.eje-online.org

  • Funding

    syndrome in meningococcal sepsis: the impact of peripheralthyroid hormone metabolism and binding proteins. Journal ofClinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005 90 56135720.

    relationship to survival in children with bacterial sepsis and septic

    154 A G Angelousi and others EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164(doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0888)15 Yildizdas D, Onenli-Mungan N, Yapicioglu H, Topaloglu AK,

    Sertdemir Y & Yuksel B. Thyroid hormone levels and theirThis review did not receive any specific grant from any funding agencyin the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

    References

    1 Lodha R, Vivekanandhan S, Sarthi M, Arun S & Kabra SK. Thyroidfunction in children with sepsis and septic shock. Acta Paediatrica2007 96 406409. (doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00135.x)

    2 Iglesias P, Munoz A, Prado F, Guerrero MT, Macas MC, Ridruejo E,Tajada P & Dez JJ. Alterations in thyroid function tests in agedhospitalized patients: prevalence, etiology and clinical outcome.Clinical Endocrinology 2009 70 961967. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03421.x)

    3 Simons RJ, Simon JM, Demers LM & Santen RJ. Thyroiddysfunction in elderly hospitalized patients. Effect of age andseverity of illness. Archives of Internal Medicine 1990 15012491253. (doi:10.1001/archinte.150.6.1249)

    4 Warner MH & Beckett GJ. Mechanisms behind the non-thyroidalillness syndrome: an update. Journal of Endocrinology 2010 205113. (doi:10.1677/JOE-09-0412)

    5 Sakharova OV & Inzucchi SE. Endocrine assessments duringcritical illness. Critical Care Clinics 2007 23 467490. (doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2007.05.007)

    6 Peeters RP, Wouters PJ, Kaptein E, van Toor H, Visser TJ & Van denBerghe G. Reduced activation and increased inactivation of thyroidhormone in tissues of critically ill patients. Journal of ClinicalEndocrinology and Metabolism 2003 88 32023211. (doi:10.1210/jc.2002-022013)

    7 Chopra IJ. Clinical review 86: euthyroid sick syndrome: is it amisnomer? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 199782 329334. (doi:10.1210/jc.82.2.329)

    8 Slag MF, Morley JE, Elson MK, Crowson TW, Nuttall FQ &Shafer RB. Hypothyroxinemia in critically ill patients as a predictorof high mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association 198124 543545.

    9 Peeters RP, Wouters PJ, van Toor H, Kaptein E, Visser TJ & Van denBerghe G. Serum 3,3 0,5 0-triiodothyronine (rT3) and 3,5,30-triiodothyronine/rT3 are prognostic markers in critically illpatients and are associated with postmortem tissue deiodinaseactivities. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005 9045594565. (doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0535)

    10 Plikat K, Langgartner J, Buettner R, Bollheimer LC,Woenckhaus U, Scholmerich J & Wrede CE. Frequency andoutcome of patients with nonthyroidal illness syndrome in amedical intensive care unit. Metabolism 2007 56 239244.(doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2006.09.020)

    11 Rothwell PM, Udwadia ZF & Lawler PG. Thyrotropin concen-tration predicts outcome in critical illness. Anaesthesia 1993 48373376. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07006.x)

    12 Kurt A, Aygun AD, Sengul I, Sen Y, Kurt AN & Ustundag B. Serumthyroid hormones levels are significantly decreased in septicneonates with poor outcome. Journal of EndocrinologicalInvestigation, 2010. (doi:10.3275/7261)

    13 den Brinker M, Dumas B, Visser TJ, Hop WC, Hazelzet JA,Festen DA, Hokken-Koelega AC & Joosten KF. Thyroid function andoutcome in children who survived meningococcal septic shock.Intensive Care Medicine 2005 31 970976. (doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2671-8)

    14 den Brinker M, Joosten KF, Visser TJ, Hop WC, de Rijke YB,Hazelzet JA, Boonstra VH & Hokken-Koelega AC. Euthyroid sickwww.eje-online.orgshock. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism 2004 1714351442.

    16 Das BK, Agarwal P, Agarwal JK & Mishra OP. Serum cortisol andthyroid hormone levels in neonates with sepsis. Indian Journal ofPediatrics 2002 69 663665. (doi:10.1007/BF02722699)

    17 Joosten KF, de Kleijn ED, Westerterp M, de Hoog M, Eijck FC,Hop WCJ, Voort EV, Hazelzet JA & Hokken-Koelega AC. Endocrineand metabolic responses in children with meningoccocal sepsis:striking differences between survivors and nonsurvivors. Journal ofClinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 85 37463753.(doi:10.1210/jc.85.10.3746)

    18 Leon-Sanz M, Lorente JA, Larrodera L, Ros P, Alvarez J, Esteban AE& Landin L. Pituitarythyroid function in patients with septicshock and its relation with outcome. European Journal of MedicalResearch 1997 2 477482.

    19 Mangas-Rojas A, Garca-Rojas JF, Barba Chacon A, Millan Nunez-Cortes J & Zamora-Madaria E. Changes in the hypophysealthyroid axis and their prognostic value in sepsis. Revista ClnicaEspanola 1990 187 395398.

    20 Van den Berghe G, de Zegher F & Lauwers P. Dopamine suppressespituitary function in infants and children. Critical Care Medicine1994 22 17471753. (doi:10.1007/BF00866735)

    21 Fukuda S. Correlations between function of pituitarythyroid axisand metabolism of catecholamines by the fetus at delivery. ClinicalEndocrinology 1987 27 331338. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb01159.x)

    22 Cavallo L, Margiotta W, Kernkamp C & Pugliese G. Serum levels ofthyrotropin, thyroxine, 3,3 0,5-triiodothyronine and 3,30,5 0-triio-dothyronine (reverse T3) in the first six days of life. Acta PaediatricaScandinavica 1980 69 4347. (doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1980.tb07027.x)

    23 Santini F, Chiovato L, Ghirri P, Lapi P, Mammoli C, Montanelli L,Scartabelli G, Ceccarini G, Coccoli L, Chopra IJ, Boldrini A &Pinchera A. Serum iodothyronines in the human fetus and thenewborn: evidence for an important role of placenta in fetalthyroid hormone homeostasis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology andMetabolism 1999 84 493498. (doi:10.1210/jc.84.2.493)

    24 Ceneviva G, Paschall JA, Maffei F & Carcillo JA. Hemodynamicsupport in fluid-refractory pediatric septic shock. Pediatrics 1998102 19. (doi:10.1542/peds.102.2.e19)

    25 Attia J, Margetts P & Guyatt G. Diagnosis of thyroid disease inhospitalized patients: a systematic review. Archives of InternalMedicine 1999 159 658665. (doi:10.1001/archinte.159.7.658)

    26 Singer M, De Santis V, Vitale D & Jeffcoate W. Multiorgan failure isan adaptive, endocrine-mediated, metabolic response to over-whelming systemic inflammation. Lancet 2004 364 545548.(doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16815-3)

    27 Stone MB & Wallace RB (eds). Committee on Medicare Coverage ofRoutine Thyroid Screening. Washington DC: National AcademiesPress, 2003.

    28 Haentjens P, Van Meerhaeghe A, Poppe K & Velkeniers B.Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and mortality: an estimate ofrelative and absolute excess all-cause mortality based ontime-to-event data from cohort studies. European Journal ofEndocrinology 2008 159 329341. (doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0110)

    29 Razvi S, Shakoor A, Vanderpump M, Weaver JU & Pearce SH. Theinfluence of age on the relationship between subclinicalhypothyroidism and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis.Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2008 9329983007. (doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0167)

    30 Burmeister LA. Reverse T3 does not reliably differentiatehypothyroid sick syndrome from euthyroid sick syndrome. Thyroid1995 5 435441. (doi:10.1089/thy.1995.5.435)

    31 Schoeman JP & Herrtage ME. Serum thyrotropin, thyroxine andfree thyroxine concentrations as predictors of mortality incritically ill puppies with parvovirus infection: a model forhuman paediatric critical illness? Microbes and Infection 2008 10203207. (doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2007.11.002)

  • 32 Moley JF, Ohkawa M, Chaudry IH, Clemens MG & Baue AE.Hypothyroidism abolishes the hyperdynamic phase and increasessusceptibility to sepsis. Journal of Surgical Research 1984 36265273. (doi:10.1016/0022-4804(84)90097-0)

    33 Inan M, Koyuncu A, Aydin C, Turan M, Gokgoz S & Sen M.Thyroid hormone supplementation in sepsis: an experimentalstudy. Surgery Today 2003 33 2429. (doi:10.1007/s005950300004)

    34 Dulchavsky SA & Bailey J. Triiodothyronine treatment maintainssurfactant synthesis during sepsis. Surgery 1992 112 475479.

    35 Dulchavsky SA, Kennedy PR, Geller ER, Maitra SR, Foster WM &Langenbeck EG. T3 preserves respiratory function in sepsis.Journal of Trauma 1991 31 753758. (doi:10.1097/00005373-199106000-00004)

    36 Little JS. Effect of thyroid hormone supplementation on survivalafter bacterial infection. Endocrinology 1985 117 14311435.(doi:10.1210/endo-117-4-1431)

    37 Zuppa AF, Nadkarni V, Davis L, Adamson PC, Helfaer MA,Elliott MR, Abrams J & Durbin D. The effect of a thyroid hormoneinfusion on vasopressor support in critically ill children withcessation of neurologic function. Critical Care Medicine 2004 3223182322. (doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000146133.52982.17)

    38 Wang HC & Klein JR. Immune function of thyroid stimulatinghormone and receptor. Critical Reviews in Immunology 2001 21323337.

    39 Klein JR. Physiological relevance of thyroid stimulating hormoneand thyroid stimulating hormone receptor in tissues other thanthe thyroid. Autoimmunity 2003 36 417421. (doi:10.1080/08916930310001603019)

    40 Csaba G & Pallinger E. Thyrotropic hormone (TSH) regulationof triiodothyronine (T(3)) concentration in immune cells.Inflammation Research 2009 58 151154. (doi:10.1007/s00011-008-8076-8)

    41 van der Poll T, Romijn JA, Wiersinga WM & Sauerwein HP. Tumornecrosis factor: a putative mediator of the sick euthyroid syndromein man. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1990 7115671572. (doi:10.1210/jcem-71-6-1567)

    42 McIver B & Gorman CA. Euthyroid sick syndrome: an overview.Thyroid 1997 7 125132. (doi:10.1089/thy.1997.7.125)

    43 Casey LC, Balk RA & Bone RC. Plasma cytokine and endotoxinlevels correlate with survival in patients with sepsis syndrome.Annals of Internal Medicine 1993 119 771777.

    44 Cowley HC, Heney D, Gearing AJ, Hemingway I & Webster NR.Increased circulating adhesion molecule concentrations inpatients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome: aprospective cohort study. Critical Care Medicine 1994 22 651657.(doi:10.1097/00003246-199404000-00022)

    45 Monig H, Arendt T, Meyer M, Kloehn S & Bewig B. Activation ofthe hypothalamo-pituitaryadrenal axis in response to septic ornon-septic diseases implications for the euthyroid sick syndrome.Intensive Care Medicine 1999 25 14021406. (doi:10.1007/s001340051088)

    46 Cummings CJ, Sessler CN, Beall LD, Fisher BJ, Best AM & Fowler AAIII. Soluble E-selectin levels in sepsis and critical illness. Correlationwith infection and hemodynamic dysfunction. American Journal ofRespiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1997 156 431437.

    47 Chinga-Alayo E, Villena J, Evans AT & Zimic M. Thyroid hormonelevels improve the prediction of mortality among patientsadmitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine 200531 13561361. (doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2719-9)

    Received 2 November 2010

    Accepted 15 November 2010

    Thyroid function and sepsis outcome 155EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2011) 164www.eje-online.org

    Outline placeholderIntroductionMethodsData sourcesStudy selection criteriaData extraction

    ResultsCharacteristics of the included studiesAssociation of thyroid hormones at baseline with outcome

    DiscussionDeclaration of interestFundingReferences