14.40 Marius Imset - A study of the mental models of ship …€¦ · A study of the mental models...
Transcript of 14.40 Marius Imset - A study of the mental models of ship …€¦ · A study of the mental models...
Research in progress / preliminary findings:
A study of the mental models of ship masters and
VTS officers regarding ship traffic in the SOMS
1
Marius ImsetAssociate professor in product design
• University College of Southeast Norway (HSN), at the Faculty of Engineering and Maritime Sciences
• 8 years industrial practice/maritime instrumentation• Involved in various national and regional development
projects for maritime industry and education• Teaching innovation course in HSN Master in Maritime
Management• Research interests and activities
– Maritime human-technology (sociotechnical) systems
– User centered design
– WP2 in the SESAME Straits project, survey
2
The SESAME Straits project goal
Page 3
• Improve safety and efficiency of ship navigation in the Straits of
Malacca and Singapore (SOMS)
• Adressing vessel traffic hot spots
• Focus on ship – shore cooperation
• Take into account the voyage of the vessel
4
WHAT
CAN BE
DONE
WHAT
SHOULD
BE DONE
e-Nav: User
Centered
Design (!)
More technology – Better, safer,
faster, easier, smarter?
Challenge: Information
overload, complexity…
So what to do? Examine the «context of use», such as….- The nature of the ship traffic (types and criticallity of situations)
- How much information is already available
- Variance in ship-shore perception (mental models)
SOMS ship-shore survey
How to improve safety and efficiencyof ship traffic in the SOMS?
Goals:
Safety
Traffic efficiency
Fuel efficiency
What are mental models?“The image of the world
around us, which we carry in
our head, is just a model.
Nobody in his head imagines
all the world, government or
country.
He has only selected concepts,
and relationships between
them, and uses those to
represent the real system.”
Legasto, A. A., Forrester, J. W., & Lyneis, J. M.
(Eds.). (1980). System dynamics. New York: North-
Holland publishing company.
Example:
Think of a
«ship»Concepts:
- Size
- Weight
- Era/age
- Cargo space
- Type
- Facilities
- Etc etc
5
Why are mental models relevant for shiptraffic management (STM)?
• “Working cooperatively requires that team members coordinate by
anticipating and predicting each other’s needs, through common
understandings of the environment and expectations of performance” (Salas et al, 2011)
6
• communicate more effectively• perform more teamwork behaviors (i.e.,
backup)• are more willing to work with team members in
the future• generally perform better
(Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001, Griepentrog & Fleming, 2003; Mohammed, Klimoski & Rentsch, 2000; Stout et al., 1999)
• may be headed toward different goals, leading to ineffective feedback or assistance
• have reduced ability to anticipate each other’s actions or needs
(Cannon-Bowers, Salas, & Converse, 1990, 1993, Burke, & Fowlkes, 1996)
Without shared mental models,
team members…
While teams that
enjoy shared mental models…
PLAYMATE?LUNCH!
7
Mental model aspectsexamined in the survey
SOMS
ship
traffic
VTS
officers
3. Are there any
differences in ship-
shore mental
models?
If so, what are they?
1. Traffic impact on
• Safety/risk
• Delays
• Fuel consumption
2. Information availability
• For predicting future situation
• For assessing current situation
1. Traffic impact on
• Safety/risk
• Delays
• Fuel consumption
2. Information availability
• For predicting future situation
• For assessing current situation
8
Ship masters
Not one situation,
but many!
7135974133 73528 75477
77973 7934473919
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015*
Number of shipsreporting in STRAITREP (until nov 2015)
Source: Marine Dept of Malaysia
VLCC / Deep Draft Tanker Vessel
LNG Carrier Cargo Vessel
Container Vessel Bulk Carrier
Ro-Ro Passenger Vessel
Livestock Carrier Tug / Tow
Government Vessel Fishing Vessel
Others TOTAL
9
www.marinetraffic.com
12 identified, challenging trafficsituations in the SOMS
1. Local fishing activities2. Local ship traffic (incl ferries etc)3. Changes in fairway depth/width4. Presence of deep draught vessels / VLCCs5. Delayed / reduced availability of port services6. Complex/dense fairway traffic (hotspots)7. Inappropriate behaviour of ships8. Communication challenges with ships9. Ship movement in achorage areas10. Presence of ships with reduced manouverability (tows etc)11. Problems with navigation aids (buoys, beacons etc)12. Challenging weather conditions
10
11
Electronic
survey
SESAME
StraitsProject
partners
Relevant
shipping
companies
121
relevant ship
masters/
navigators
14 nations
68 VTS
operators/
supervisors
(Singapore)
Survey distribution
Representing approx
1500 – 2000 SOMS
passages during the
last 5 years
Survey findings
12
SOMS
ship
traffic
VTS
officers
Ship masters
• Situations that are considered to have most
impact on safety are:– 07 Inappropriate behaviour of ships (5,12)
– 08 Communication challenges with ships (4,94)
– 12 Changing weather conditions (4,72)
– 06 Complex fairway dynamics / hotspots (4,68)
• Situations that sea personnel consider
more risky than VTS personell:– 02 Local ship traffic (1,34)
– 11 Navigation aid problems (0,61)
– 09 Ship movement in anchorage areas (0,47)
• Situations that VTS personnel consider
more risky than ship personnel– 01 Local fishing activities (0,49)
– 05 Delayed/reduced availabilityof port services (0,49)
– 08 Communication challenges with ships (0,40)
Impact of situations onincidents/accidents
13
4.09
3.443.01
3.63 3.50
4.685.12 4.94
4.644.24
3.80
4.72
0.49
1.34
0.11 0.070.49
0.23 0.30 0.40 0.470.26
0.610.190.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
Shore based average (0-6) Ship based average (0-6)
Total average (0-6) Sea-shore difference (absolute)
Impact of situations on delays
• Situations that are considered to have most
impact on delays are:– 07 Inappropriate ship behaviour (4,46)
– 06 Complex fairway dynamics / hotspots (4,24)
• Situations that ship personnel consider more
delaying (than VTS officers)– 02 Local ship traffic (1,72)
– 09 Ship movement in anchorage areas (0,43)
• Situations that VTS personnel consider more
delaying– 05 Delayed /reduced availability of port services (1,15)
– 12 Challenging weather conditions (0,79)
– 08 Communication challenges with ships (0,47)
14
3.48
2.87 2.68
3.29
3.824.24
4.464.03 3.86 4.01
2.67
4.06
0.06
1.72
0.11 0.23
1.15
0.170.44 0.47 0.43 0.26
0.06
0.79
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
Shore based average (0-6) Ship based average (0-6)
Total average (0-6) Sea-shore difference (absolute)
• Situations that are considered to have most
impact on fuel consumption– 07 Inappropriate ship behaviour (3,37)
– 06 Complex fairway dynamics / hotspots (3,23)
– 05 Delayed/reduced availabilityof port services (3,22)
• Only one situation that is considered more
critical by ship personnel– 02 Local ship traffic (0,77)
• Situations that VTS personnel consider
more fuel consuming are– 12 Challenging weather conditions (0,76)
– 08 Communication challenges with ships (0,54)
– 07 Inappropriate ship behaviour (0,48)
– 10 Vessels that could hamper other traffic (tows etc) (0,48)
Impact of situations onextra fuel consumption
15
2.602.39 2.39
2.72
3.22 3.23 3.373.04 2.85 2.97
1.99
3.12
0.09
0.77
0.15 0.17 0.07 0.040.48 0.54
0.32 0.48 0.400.76
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
Shore based average (0-6) Ship based average (0-6)
Total average (0-6) Sea-shore difference (absolute)
• Data indicate there is least information
available about:– 01 Local fishing activities (2,92)
– 05 Delayed/reduced availabilityof port services (3,57)
• Ship personnel indicate they have more
information about:– 01 Local fishing activities (1,29)
– 11 Navigation aid problems (0,56)
• Shore personnel have more information
available about:– 07 Inappropriate behaviour of ships (0,51)
– 10 Vessels that could hamper other traffic (tows etc) (0,28)
Availability of informationabout situations
16
2.92
3.82 3.964.25
3.573.85 3.83 3.68 3.78
4.16 4.09 4.07
1.29
0.21 0.370.11
0.470.15
0.51
0.00 0.14 0.280.56
0.150.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
Shore based average (0-6) Ship based average (0-6)
Total average (0-6) Sea-shore difference (absolute)
Summary
• Ship and shore personnel seem to have a shared mental model about ship traffic,
but there are also differences that should be explored in more depth (causes)
• The findings provide focus areas for STM improvement in terms of:
– Situations with the most perceived impact on safety, delays and fuel consumption
– Situations with little/less available information
– Situations where there are differences in ship-shore mental models
17
• To collect survey data from Singapore pilots
• Finalize data analysis and dissimination
• Apply same survey/approach in other high traffic areas (?)
Further research progress
18
Thank you!
Marius Imset