1.4 Layer of Protection

download 1.4 Layer of Protection

of 41

Transcript of 1.4 Layer of Protection

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    1/41

    1.4 Layer of Protection

    DR. AA

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    2/41

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    3/41

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    4/41

    Technology - Multiple PIDs, cascade, feedforward,

    etc.

    Always control unstable variables(Examples )

    Always control quicksafety related variables

    - Stable variables that tend to change quickly

    (Examples?)

    Monitor variables that change very slowly

    - Corrosion, erosion, build up of materials

    Provide safe response to critical instrumentationfailures

    - But, we use instrumentation in the BPCS?

    1. Basic process Control System (BPCS)

    4

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    5/41

    Control Strategy

    Feedback Control

    Single-loop feedback

    Overcoming disturbances

    Cascade

    Feed forward Ratio

    Constraints

    Split-range, override/select control

    Multivariable

    multi-loop

    Decoupling

    Multivariable control

    5

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    6/41

    Typical Control Loop

    Controller

    F1

    T1

    T

    F

    F2

    T2

    TC

    Actuator

    System

    TT

    Sensor

    System

    6

    Major components- Sensor & Transmitter

    - Cables

    - Controller

    - Actuator

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    7/41

    Level Control on a Tank

    Fin

    LT

    Fout

    Lsp

    LC

    Without a cascade levelcontroller, changes in

    downstream pressure disturb

    the tank level.

    Ordinary Feedback Control

    Fin

    FC

    LT

    RSP

    FT

    Fout

    Lsp

    LC

    With cascade level controller, changes

    in downstream pressure will be

    absorbed by the flow controller before

    they can significantly affect tank level

    because the flow controller responds

    faster to this disturbance than the tank

    level process.

    Cascade Control

    7

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    8/41

    Level Control: Feedback vs feedforward

    Make-upWater

    To SteamUsers

    LT

    LC

    Feedback-only mustabsorb the variations in

    steam usage by feedback

    action only.

    Make-upWater

    To Steam Users

    LT

    FT

    FF

    Feedforward-only handle variation

    in steam usage but small errors in

    metering will eventually empty or

    fill the tank.

    FeedforwardFeedback

    8

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    9/41

    Level Control: Feedforward-Feedback

    To SteamUsers

    LT

    FT FF

    LC +

    Make-up Water

    Combined feedforward and feedback has best

    features of both controllers.

    9

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    10/41

    Split Range Control: Another Example

    FT

    FT

    FC

    FC

    Sometimes a single flow control loop cannot provide accurate

    flow metering over the full range of operation.

    Split range flow control uses two flow controllers One with a small control valve and one with a large control

    valve

    At low flow rates, the large valve is closed and the small valve

    provides accurate flow control.

    At large flow rates, both valve are open.

    Larger Valve

    SignaltoControlValve(%)

    Smaller Valve

    Total Flowrate

    10

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    11/41

    Titration Curve for a Strong Acid-Strong Base

    System

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01

    Base to Acid Ratio

    pH

    Therefore, for accurate pH control for a wide range of flow rates

    for acid wastewater, a split range flow controller for the NaOH is

    required.

    11

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    12/41

    Override/Select Control

    Override/Select control uses LS and HS action tochange which controller is applied to the

    manipulated variable.

    Override/Select control uses select action to

    switch between manipulated variables using the

    same control objective.

    12

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    13/41

    Furnace Tube Temperature Constraint Control

    FT

    FC

    TT TT

    LS TCTC

    RSP

    FlueGas

    Process

    FluidFuel

    13

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    14/41

    Column Flooding Constraint Control

    FT

    AC

    AT

    LSDPC

    FC

    RSP

    Lower value of flowrate is selected to avoid column flooding

    14

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    15/41

    T1

    Cold

    feed

    T2

    TYTC

    Measured value

    to PID

    controller

    Controller

    output

    >

    TY

    Selects the

    largest of all

    inputs

    To increase safety when using dangerously high

    reactor temperature, use of multiple sensors and

    select most conservative value !

    15

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    16/41

    Summary of Control Strategies

    Feedback Control

    Enhancement of single-loop Feedback control

    Cascade, split-range, override control

    Feedforward and Ratio Control

    Computed Control (e.g. reboiler duty, internal reflux etc) Advanced Control

    Inferential control

    Predictive control

    Adaptive control

    Multivariable control

    16

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    17/41

    Alarm has an anunciator and visualindication

    - No action is automated!

    - A plant operator must decide.

    Digital computer stores a record of recent

    alarms

    Alarms should catch sensor failures

    - But, sensors are used to measure variables

    for alarm checking?

    2. Alarms that require actions by a Person

    17

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    18/41

    Common error is to design too many alarms- Easy to include; simple (perhaps, incorrect) fix to preventrepeat of safety incident

    - example: One plant had 17 alarms/h - operator acted on only 8%

    Establish and observe clear priority ranking

    2. Alarms that require actions by a Person

    - HIGH = Hazard to people or equip., action required

    - MEDIUM = Loss of RM, close monitoring required

    - LOW = investigate when time available

    18

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    19/41

    Automatic action usually stops part of plant

    operation to achieve safe conditions- Can divert flow to containment or disposal

    - Can stop potentially hazardous process, e.g.,

    combustion

    Capacity of the alternative process must be forworst case

    SIS prevents unusual situations

    - We must be able to start up and shut down

    - Very fast blips might not be significant

    Extreme corrective action is required and automated

    - More aggressive than process control (BPCS)

    Alarm to operator when an SIS takes action

    3. Safety Interlock System (SIS)

    19

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    20/41

    The automation strategy is usually simple, for example,

    If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero

    steam

    water

    LC

    PC

    fuel

    How do we

    automate this SISwhen PC is adjusting

    the valve?

    Example

    20

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    21/41

    If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero

    steam

    water

    LC

    PC

    fuel

    LS s s

    fc fc

    15 psig

    LS = level switch, note that separate sensor is used

    s = solenoid valve (open/closed) fc = fail closed

    Extra valve with tight shutoff

    3. Safety Interlock System

    21

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    22/41

    The automation strategy may involve several

    variables, any one of which could activate the SIS

    If L123 < L123min; or

    If T105 > T105max.

    then, reduce fuel to zero

    SIS

    100

    L123T105

    ..

    s

    Shown as box

    in drawing with

    details elsewhere

    SIS: Another Example

    22

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    23/41

    The SIF saves us from hazards, but can shutdown the plant

    for false reasons, e.g., instrument failure.

    1 out of 1

    must indicate

    failure

    T100s

    2 out of 3

    must indicatefailure

    T100

    T101T102

    s

    False

    shutdownFailure on

    demand

    5 x 10-35 x 10-3

    2.5 x 10-6 2.5 x 10-6

    Better

    performance,

    more expensive

    SIS: measurement redundancy

    Same variable,

    multiple sensors!

    23

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    24/41

    We desire independent protection layers, withoutcommon-cause failures - Separate systems

    sensors

    SIS system

    i/o i/o.

    sensors

    Digital control system

    i/o i/o.

    BPCS and AlarmsSIS and Alarms

    associated with SIS

    SIS & DCS

    24

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    25/41

    4. Safety Relief System

    Overpressure Increase in pressure can lead to rupture of vessel or

    pipe and release of toxic or flammable material

    Underpressure

    Also, we must protect against unexpected vacuum!

    Relief systems provide an exit path for fluid

    Benefits: safety, environmental protection,

    equipment protection, reduced insurance,

    compliance with governmental code

    25

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    26/41

    Entirely self-contained, no external power required

    The action is automatic - does not require a person

    Usually, goal is to achieve reasonable pressure

    - Prevent high (over-) pressure

    - Prevent low (under-) pressure

    The capacity should be for the worst case

    scenario

    4. Safety Relief System

    26

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    27/41

    No external power required -

    self actuating - pressure of

    process provides needed force!

    Valve close when pressure

    returns to acceptable value

    Relief Valve - liquid systems Safety Valve - gas and vapor

    systems including steam

    Safety Relief Valve - liquid

    and/or vapor systems

    Pressure of protected systemcan exceed the set pressure.

    4. Safety Relief System

    Process

    27

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    28/41

    I li f l d di h d

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    29/41

    Why is the pressure

    indicator provided?

    Is it local or remotely

    displayed? Why?

    What is the advantage of two in series?

    Why not have two relief valves (diaphragms) in series?

    In some cases, relief valve and diaphragm are used

    in series WHY?

    29

    In some cases relief valve and diaphragm are

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    30/41

    Why is the pressureindicator provided?

    If the pressure

    increases, the disk

    has a leak and should

    be replaced.

    Is it local or remotely

    displayed? Why?

    The display is local to

    reduce cost, because

    we do not have to

    respond immediately

    to a failed disk - the

    situation is not

    hazardous.

    What is the

    advantage of two in

    series?

    The disc protects the

    valve from corrosiveor sticky material.

    The valve closes

    when the pressure

    returns below the

    set value.

    In some cases, relief valve and diaphragm are

    used in seriesWHY?

    30

    We should also protect against excessive

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    31/41

    This example uses buckling pins

    overpressure

    underpressure

    We should also protect against excessive

    vacuum

    31

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    32/41

    Location of Relief System

    Identify potential for damage due to high (or low)pressure (HAZOP Study)

    In general, closed volume with ANY potential for

    pressure increase may have exit path that should not be closed but could be

    hand valve, control valve (even fail open), blockage of line

    Remember, this is the last resort, when all other safetysystems have not been adequate and a fast response is

    required!

    32

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    33/41

    Flash Drum Example

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    34/41

    LETS CONSIDER A FLASH DRUM

    Is this process safe and ready to operate?

    Is the design completed?

    T5F1

    34

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    35/41

    Where could we use BPCS in the flash process?

    F1

    Basic Process Control System

    35

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    36/41

    The level is

    unstable; it mustbe controlled.

    The pressure will

    change quickly and

    affect safety; it

    must be controlled.

    F1

    36

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    37/41

    F1

    Where could

    we use alarms

    in the flash process?

    Alarms

    37

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    38/41

    F1

    A low level could

    damage the

    pump; a high

    level could allowliquid in the

    vapor line.

    The pressure affects

    safety, add a high

    alarmPAH

    LAH

    LALToo much light key

    could result in a

    large economic

    lossAAH

    38

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    39/41

    F1

    Safety Relief System

    Add relief to the following system

    39

    Th d b i l t d ith th t l l li f i

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    40/41

    F1

    The drum can be isolated with the control valves; pressure relief is

    required.

    We would like to recover without shutdown; we select a relief valve.

    40

  • 8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection

    41/41

    End of Topic 1.4