1.4 Layer of Protection
-
Upload
srinivas-bobby -
Category
Documents
-
view
234 -
download
2
Transcript of 1.4 Layer of Protection
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
1/41
1.4 Layer of Protection
DR. AA
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
2/41
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
3/41
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
4/41
Technology - Multiple PIDs, cascade, feedforward,
etc.
Always control unstable variables(Examples )
Always control quicksafety related variables
- Stable variables that tend to change quickly
(Examples?)
Monitor variables that change very slowly
- Corrosion, erosion, build up of materials
Provide safe response to critical instrumentationfailures
- But, we use instrumentation in the BPCS?
1. Basic process Control System (BPCS)
4
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
5/41
Control Strategy
Feedback Control
Single-loop feedback
Overcoming disturbances
Cascade
Feed forward Ratio
Constraints
Split-range, override/select control
Multivariable
multi-loop
Decoupling
Multivariable control
5
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
6/41
Typical Control Loop
Controller
F1
T1
T
F
F2
T2
TC
Actuator
System
TT
Sensor
System
6
Major components- Sensor & Transmitter
- Cables
- Controller
- Actuator
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
7/41
Level Control on a Tank
Fin
LT
Fout
Lsp
LC
Without a cascade levelcontroller, changes in
downstream pressure disturb
the tank level.
Ordinary Feedback Control
Fin
FC
LT
RSP
FT
Fout
Lsp
LC
With cascade level controller, changes
in downstream pressure will be
absorbed by the flow controller before
they can significantly affect tank level
because the flow controller responds
faster to this disturbance than the tank
level process.
Cascade Control
7
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
8/41
Level Control: Feedback vs feedforward
Make-upWater
To SteamUsers
LT
LC
Feedback-only mustabsorb the variations in
steam usage by feedback
action only.
Make-upWater
To Steam Users
LT
FT
FF
Feedforward-only handle variation
in steam usage but small errors in
metering will eventually empty or
fill the tank.
FeedforwardFeedback
8
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
9/41
Level Control: Feedforward-Feedback
To SteamUsers
LT
FT FF
LC +
Make-up Water
Combined feedforward and feedback has best
features of both controllers.
9
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
10/41
Split Range Control: Another Example
FT
FT
FC
FC
Sometimes a single flow control loop cannot provide accurate
flow metering over the full range of operation.
Split range flow control uses two flow controllers One with a small control valve and one with a large control
valve
At low flow rates, the large valve is closed and the small valve
provides accurate flow control.
At large flow rates, both valve are open.
Larger Valve
SignaltoControlValve(%)
Smaller Valve
Total Flowrate
10
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
11/41
Titration Curve for a Strong Acid-Strong Base
System
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01
Base to Acid Ratio
pH
Therefore, for accurate pH control for a wide range of flow rates
for acid wastewater, a split range flow controller for the NaOH is
required.
11
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
12/41
Override/Select Control
Override/Select control uses LS and HS action tochange which controller is applied to the
manipulated variable.
Override/Select control uses select action to
switch between manipulated variables using the
same control objective.
12
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
13/41
Furnace Tube Temperature Constraint Control
FT
FC
TT TT
LS TCTC
RSP
FlueGas
Process
FluidFuel
13
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
14/41
Column Flooding Constraint Control
FT
AC
AT
LSDPC
FC
RSP
Lower value of flowrate is selected to avoid column flooding
14
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
15/41
T1
Cold
feed
T2
TYTC
Measured value
to PID
controller
Controller
output
>
TY
Selects the
largest of all
inputs
To increase safety when using dangerously high
reactor temperature, use of multiple sensors and
select most conservative value !
15
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
16/41
Summary of Control Strategies
Feedback Control
Enhancement of single-loop Feedback control
Cascade, split-range, override control
Feedforward and Ratio Control
Computed Control (e.g. reboiler duty, internal reflux etc) Advanced Control
Inferential control
Predictive control
Adaptive control
Multivariable control
16
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
17/41
Alarm has an anunciator and visualindication
- No action is automated!
- A plant operator must decide.
Digital computer stores a record of recent
alarms
Alarms should catch sensor failures
- But, sensors are used to measure variables
for alarm checking?
2. Alarms that require actions by a Person
17
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
18/41
Common error is to design too many alarms- Easy to include; simple (perhaps, incorrect) fix to preventrepeat of safety incident
- example: One plant had 17 alarms/h - operator acted on only 8%
Establish and observe clear priority ranking
2. Alarms that require actions by a Person
- HIGH = Hazard to people or equip., action required
- MEDIUM = Loss of RM, close monitoring required
- LOW = investigate when time available
18
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
19/41
Automatic action usually stops part of plant
operation to achieve safe conditions- Can divert flow to containment or disposal
- Can stop potentially hazardous process, e.g.,
combustion
Capacity of the alternative process must be forworst case
SIS prevents unusual situations
- We must be able to start up and shut down
- Very fast blips might not be significant
Extreme corrective action is required and automated
- More aggressive than process control (BPCS)
Alarm to operator when an SIS takes action
3. Safety Interlock System (SIS)
19
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
20/41
The automation strategy is usually simple, for example,
If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero
steam
water
LC
PC
fuel
How do we
automate this SISwhen PC is adjusting
the valve?
Example
20
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
21/41
If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero
steam
water
LC
PC
fuel
LS s s
fc fc
15 psig
LS = level switch, note that separate sensor is used
s = solenoid valve (open/closed) fc = fail closed
Extra valve with tight shutoff
3. Safety Interlock System
21
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
22/41
The automation strategy may involve several
variables, any one of which could activate the SIS
If L123 < L123min; or
If T105 > T105max.
then, reduce fuel to zero
SIS
100
L123T105
..
s
Shown as box
in drawing with
details elsewhere
SIS: Another Example
22
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
23/41
The SIF saves us from hazards, but can shutdown the plant
for false reasons, e.g., instrument failure.
1 out of 1
must indicate
failure
T100s
2 out of 3
must indicatefailure
T100
T101T102
s
False
shutdownFailure on
demand
5 x 10-35 x 10-3
2.5 x 10-6 2.5 x 10-6
Better
performance,
more expensive
SIS: measurement redundancy
Same variable,
multiple sensors!
23
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
24/41
We desire independent protection layers, withoutcommon-cause failures - Separate systems
sensors
SIS system
i/o i/o.
sensors
Digital control system
i/o i/o.
BPCS and AlarmsSIS and Alarms
associated with SIS
SIS & DCS
24
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
25/41
4. Safety Relief System
Overpressure Increase in pressure can lead to rupture of vessel or
pipe and release of toxic or flammable material
Underpressure
Also, we must protect against unexpected vacuum!
Relief systems provide an exit path for fluid
Benefits: safety, environmental protection,
equipment protection, reduced insurance,
compliance with governmental code
25
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
26/41
Entirely self-contained, no external power required
The action is automatic - does not require a person
Usually, goal is to achieve reasonable pressure
- Prevent high (over-) pressure
- Prevent low (under-) pressure
The capacity should be for the worst case
scenario
4. Safety Relief System
26
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
27/41
No external power required -
self actuating - pressure of
process provides needed force!
Valve close when pressure
returns to acceptable value
Relief Valve - liquid systems Safety Valve - gas and vapor
systems including steam
Safety Relief Valve - liquid
and/or vapor systems
Pressure of protected systemcan exceed the set pressure.
4. Safety Relief System
Process
27
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
28/41
I li f l d di h d
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
29/41
Why is the pressure
indicator provided?
Is it local or remotely
displayed? Why?
What is the advantage of two in series?
Why not have two relief valves (diaphragms) in series?
In some cases, relief valve and diaphragm are used
in series WHY?
29
In some cases relief valve and diaphragm are
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
30/41
Why is the pressureindicator provided?
If the pressure
increases, the disk
has a leak and should
be replaced.
Is it local or remotely
displayed? Why?
The display is local to
reduce cost, because
we do not have to
respond immediately
to a failed disk - the
situation is not
hazardous.
What is the
advantage of two in
series?
The disc protects the
valve from corrosiveor sticky material.
The valve closes
when the pressure
returns below the
set value.
In some cases, relief valve and diaphragm are
used in seriesWHY?
30
We should also protect against excessive
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
31/41
This example uses buckling pins
overpressure
underpressure
We should also protect against excessive
vacuum
31
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
32/41
Location of Relief System
Identify potential for damage due to high (or low)pressure (HAZOP Study)
In general, closed volume with ANY potential for
pressure increase may have exit path that should not be closed but could be
hand valve, control valve (even fail open), blockage of line
Remember, this is the last resort, when all other safetysystems have not been adequate and a fast response is
required!
32
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
33/41
Flash Drum Example
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
34/41
LETS CONSIDER A FLASH DRUM
Is this process safe and ready to operate?
Is the design completed?
T5F1
34
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
35/41
Where could we use BPCS in the flash process?
F1
Basic Process Control System
35
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
36/41
The level is
unstable; it mustbe controlled.
The pressure will
change quickly and
affect safety; it
must be controlled.
F1
36
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
37/41
F1
Where could
we use alarms
in the flash process?
Alarms
37
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
38/41
F1
A low level could
damage the
pump; a high
level could allowliquid in the
vapor line.
The pressure affects
safety, add a high
alarmPAH
LAH
LALToo much light key
could result in a
large economic
lossAAH
38
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
39/41
F1
Safety Relief System
Add relief to the following system
39
Th d b i l t d ith th t l l li f i
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
40/41
F1
The drum can be isolated with the control valves; pressure relief is
required.
We would like to recover without shutdown; we select a relief valve.
40
-
8/13/2019 1.4 Layer of Protection
41/41
End of Topic 1.4