13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13!...

33
13.07.13 1 Ilya Bindeman, University of Oregon Collaborators: A.K. Schmitt (UCLA), D.A.D. Evans (Yale), N.S. Serebryakov (Moscow), A. Bekker (Manitoba) Thanks to: P. Hoffman ( U Victoria), Guan B, J Eiler (Caltech) J Vazquez (USGS) NSF grant EAR 108786 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving microanalytical evidence in subglacially hydrothermally- altered (down to -27.3‰ δ 18 O) rocks and coeval supergene materials Snowballearth.org

Transcript of 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13!...

Page 1: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

1

Snowballearth.org

Ilya Bindeman, University of Oregon

Collaborators: A.K. Schmitt (UCLA), D.A.D. Evans (Yale), N.S. Serebryakov (Moscow), A. Bekker (Manitoba)

Thanks to: P. Hoffman ( U Victoria), Guan B, J Eiler (Caltech) J Vazquez (USGS) NSF grant EAR 108786

Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving microanalytical evidence in subglacially hydrothermally-altered (down to -27.3‰  δ18O)  rocks and coeval supergene materials  

Snowballearth.org

Page 2: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

2

Valley et al., 2005

Page 3: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

3

The world “record”: 2.45Ga, -27.3‰ δ18O metagabbro/gneisses from Karelia, Russia���

δD= -235‰

Global Distribution of water isotopes www.waterisotopes.org

Karelian values

Page 4: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

4

Comparison with Modern climates

... Greenland-like, -20°C to -35°C

-25‰ and below

Low-δ18O rocks and magmas track cold climates

-25

-15

-5

5 Rock

Page 5: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

5

Belomorian Belt

A!

In 2.4 Ga gabbro 2.6 Ga gneiss

The lowest isotope values:

Page 6: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

6

Ky-Grt-Bi Grt-Bi

Ruby-Grt-Bi

Grt-gabbro

-27.3‰

Page 7: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

7

“Old” isotope sampling map 2011

and 2012:

2011

2010 Red – low δ18O Yellow- normal

Page 8: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

8

Isotope Profiles in other localities:

Bindeman and Serebryakov, EPSL, 2011

Equilibrium within crystal clusters, δ18O heterogeneity on cm, m, 10 m scales

Page 9: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

9

Bull’s Eye patterns are very common in ore deposits (Taylor, 1973, 1974), in Skaergaard Intrusion (Taylor and Forester 1979)

Explanation: Rifting under ice

Page 10: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

10

Summary of field/geological observations

•  2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic intrusions, 1.9 Ga metamorphism

•  Depletions of δ18O and δD are in or near contacts with 2.4-2.45 Ga mafic intrusions

•  These intrusions are related to rifting •  Depletions of δ18O and δD form “bull’s eye” concentric

pattern, characteristic of modern hydrothermal systems •  Depleted localities occur over 220 km

Bindeman et al. 2013 in press

Tectonic Story Zircon Story!

2.6Ga

2.4 Ga hydrothermal alteration

1.9Ga metamorphism

Low-δ18O matrix ca -27‰ Intact 2.6 Ga, +7‰ zircon

Low-δ18O matrix, 1.9Ga, -27‰ rims

Normal-δ18O matrix, zircon

Page 11: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

11

Methods

K a relia 17- O va ria tions

y = 0.5276x + 0.2033

R2 = 1.0000

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10

1 0 0 0 * l n(1 + d 1 8 O /1 0 0 0 )

10

00

*ln

(1+

d1

7O

/1

00

0)

Karelian samples firmly belong to the “Equilubrium” terrestrial 18O/16O -17O/16O fractionation line

TFL

Page 12: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

12

Cometary Impact? No: Δ17O = 0‰

Analysis of individual minerals in crystal clusters

Bindeman et al 2010

Page 13: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

13

Isotope Mapping of a single corundum crystal

Fig. 5

Hydrogen Isotopes Insights - record low δD of -235‰

Page 14: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

14

2.4Ga Subglacial Rifting

Karelia in the Paleoproterozoic:

Bindeman Schmit Evans 2010

Page 15: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

15

Paleoprot. glacial

deposits

a"er  assembly  in  the  Nuna  

supercon4nent  

Figure  from  Young,  2004  

Page 16: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

16

Using zircon to resolve the timing of δ18O depletion

•  Perfect mineral to retain U-Pb age and δ18O values •  Requires high T (ca>650°C) to recrystallize or exchange O •  So it only records magmatic or metamorphic episodes •  Untouched by hydrothermal alteration

Dating synglacial intrusions = Dating glaciations (and rise of atmospheric oxygen)

Page 17: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

17

Zircon Story: 2.6Ga rock

2.4 Ga hydrothermal alteration

1.9Ga metamorphism

Low-δ18O matrix ca -27‰ Intact 2.6 Ga, +7‰ zircon

Low-δ18O matrix 2.6 Ga, +8‰ zircon cores, 1.9Ga, -27‰ rims

Normal-δ18O matrix, zircon

rims K5

rims AB-3351

When did the δ18O depletion happen? Nuna Superia Supercontinents:

Rifti

ng, h

ydro

ther

mal

alte

ratio

n

Rifti

ng, h

ydro

ther

mal

alte

ratio

n

Glacials

Page 18: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

18

Page 19: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

19

How did it happen?

Do Karelian rocks record Snowball or “Slushball Earth”?

Page 20: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

20

+4‰

+6‰

-2‰

-11‰ ? Tiny amounts, Mixed with snowflakes

δ18O water, ‰

Jormangund Climate State (2011):��� Dorian Abbot (U Chicago)

Page 21: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

21

Modern

Hard-Snowball

Jormangund

Page 22: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

22

Slush-Ball vs Hard Snow Ball Earth climate models and implications

Page 23: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

23

18O/16O in Global Circulation Model of Slushball Earth δ18O, ‰

Jun-Eun Lee and Bindeman in prep.

Page 24: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

24

T a nd d18O vs la titude

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

-25 -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75

La titude, degrees

T o

r d

18

O,

‰ S

MO

W

T' °Cd18O, precipi tation

Equa

tor

Over Ocean

Over continent

Karelian Position

Conclusions and what’s next? - Kareilan Gneiss record depletion during ~2.4 “Slushball Earth” or

Jurmangand episode (the first of the 3) to allow for effective vapor δ18O, δD distillation

- What is next? We are trying to find sedimentary rock that would

correspond in age to the Slushball Earth episode - Testing stability of the Slushball Earth model is required

Page 25: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

25

Supracrustal Materials that may record δ18Owater:

-  Secondary Quartz – Amygdaloids -  Glacial Rock flower -  Pillow basalts -  Shales

Comparison with Antarctica

Page 26: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

26

Why most depleted oxygen isotopes are found in mid- to ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks? - Dabie Shan -Sulu (China) coesite-bearing eclogites, -10 to +2 ‰ (Rumble and Yui, 1998; Zheng et al. 2004-2010) 800-200 Ma 500 papers published on δ18O in Dabie Shan! - Kokchetav (Kazakhstan), coesite-bearing, down to -3.9‰ (Masago, Rumble et al 2003) 580-530 Ma Now Karelia -27‰! Mid grade kyanite-bearing gneisses 2.6-1.8 Ga

Bindeman et al., 2013 in press

Page 27: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

27

Fiordfelt +7.3, +12.2‰

Makbal +6.9‰

Kumdikul +6.6‰

Alpe Arami +3.9-5.4‰

Erzgebirge

Rodopi +11.3‰

+10.6‰

Sederonero +13.4‰

Oxygen isotopic values of diamond-bearing, exhumed UHP metamorphic rocks: Mostly high-δ18O

Sample collection of Larissa Dobrzhinetskaya, UC Riverside

How long does it take?

Snowballearth.org

Page 28: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

28

Dissolution in 200°C fresh water

Reed et al. Chiller Program

Modeling Chemical ���change to make ���

high-Al lithology

Fig. A Retrogression of oxygen isotopic values in a typical corundum bearing assemblage as a function of cooling and d ifferential closure using Fast Grain Boundary diffusion model of Eiler, Baumgartner, and Valley, (1993). Notice that even at slow cooling rate of 1 degree per million years corundum, garnet, hornblende, staurolite, and kyanite do not retrogress and preserve their original, peak metamorphic temperature of formation. Plagioclase, rutile, and biotite display retrogression of less than 0.7 permil. Sizes of minerals and their proportions are given in the table. At faster cooling rate even less retrogression is expected. Therefore, Isotope heterogeneity observed within hand specimen (see Table A1 and Bindeman et al. 2010, Fig. 2) cannot be explained by differential retrogression and must reflect source variability and interaction with external fluids.

Page 29: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

29

Extra Generic Snowballearth slides from Snowballearth.org

Pale

opro

tero

zoic

?

Page 30: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

30

Paleoproterozoic Glaciations

Hydrologic Cycle on Snowball Earth? None

Page 31: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

31

Vaalbara supercraton

Paleomag. (De Kock et al., 2009)

Meteorite Bore Member, Kungarra Fm (Pilbara) Makganyene Fm (Kaapvaal)

Paleoproterozoic glacial deposits original  distribu4on  in  the  

Superia  supercraton  

Hw  

K  

C  Hn  Ch  

S  

Figure  a2er  Ernst  &  Bleeker  2008  

reassembled in Nuna

Page 32: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

32

Stratigraphic column of the Huronian Supergroup in Ontario, Canada (modified from Bekker et al., 2006: One OR Three Glaciations?

2.32Ga

2.4 Ga Karelia Glaciation

Glacial paleolatitudes

darker shade indicates more reliable paleomagnetic data

Paleoproterozoic units Meteorite Bore: 05° Makganyene: 11° Gowganda: 03° (?) Sariolian: 07-27°

Page 33: 13.07.13 Snowball or Slushball Earth Glaciation 2.4Ga? Resolving … · 2013. 7. 18. · 13.07.13! 10! Summary of field/geological observations! • 2.6 Ga Gneiss, 2.4 Ga mafic

13.07.13

33

a b c

d e

Field relations between different rock types: a) original Chupa gneiss; b) St-Pl pseudomorphs over large crystal of Ky at Khitostrov; c) rock with large Crn; d) St-Pl pseudomorphs over large crystal of Ky at Khitostrov; d) Corundum-bearing rock (pen is pointing to Crn), impregnated by plagioclazite at Khitostrov; e) large crystals of garnet in chloritic rock inside amphibolite at Mt. Dyadina.