1/27/05 –2/1 Small Group Discussion Differences between science and post- processualism as...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1/27/05 –2/1 Small Group Discussion Differences between science and post- processualism as...
1/27/05 –2/1
Small Group DiscussionDifferences between science and post-processualism as intellectual structures role of ideas in both meaning of theory in both explanation versus interpretation
Development of the Discipline
Definition of a archaeology as a discipline
coherent set of ideas,methods and techniques to investigate the
human past1860: establishment of archaeology as
a discipline. Why?
deep time for humans
SPECULATIVE PERIOD IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeology as the study of the human past is a western European discipline
Curiosity about origin of American Indians
is as old as Columbian voyages. Who are they people? What is their origin?
no archaeology involved
Bartolomé de las Casas 1520
Dominican Priest Defender of American
Indians American Indians
were “lambs of God”. They were not natural slaves
Must be protected by the Spanish Crown
Doctrine of Progress
18th C: “Scalae Natura” (The Scale of Nature)
All people can improve, regardless of orgin
19th C: Social Darwinism
Biology and Cultural progress Scaled
Summary
From 1492 on, there was curiosity and discussion regarding the American Indians. Who they were? How they related to the story of creation in the Bible?
Because the Bible was Judeo-Christian, all societies were viewed from a European perspective…
Result: A genuine racism (from a contemporary view point) develops---American Indians as inferior.
This position becomes incorporated in the social darwinism of the late 19th and early 20th century
Mound Builder Debate
Resolved in the late 19th c.
An American Paleolithic
The discovery of Folsom in 1927
Issues that resulted in the Development of American
Archaeology
Cyrus Thomas,
Director of Mound Survey
Copper Breast Plate, Etowah
Georgia
Mound
Stratigraphic
Cross Section
Etowah
Smithsonian
Institution
Summary
• 1. Gave American Indians back their birth right.
• 2. Political Context: By the late 19th century, European hegemony in the United States established. Indian groups subdued
• 3. Systematic empirical investigation resulted in the establishment of Method and Technique ( archaeology)
Debate regarding Age of Native Populations in the Americas
Resolved in 1927 at Folsom New Mexico when a human spear point was found embedded in the Ribs of an extinct Bison.
Humans coexisted with extinct megafauna.
Therefore time depth to the Native American Record
Summary: What We’ve Covered
1. Development of Archaeology as a Discipline2. Occurred because of questions that could only be
answered by empirical investigation. (Had to stop speculating and examine the archaeological record)
3. Significant Consequencesa. Developed a coherent set of methods and techniques ( many derived from geology). In the US, Government investigations of the MB resulted in “standardization” b. Establishment of the Disciplinec. Establishment of Human Antiquity overturnedBiblical accounts of the creation of humans