Application for Pleasure Craft LicenceGENERAL INFORMATIONUse this
12/25/2009 Pleasure Craft Proposal Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions Regulation and...
-
Upload
melina-lindsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 12/25/2009 Pleasure Craft Proposal Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions Regulation and...
112/25/20092/25/2009
Pleasure Craft ProposalPleasure Craft Proposal
Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions Regulation and
Standards
2/25/20092/25/2009 22
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 33
ObjectivesObjectives
1. Seek public participation in process
2. Share information on control technology testing
3. Seek input on draft proposal
2/25/20092/25/2009 44
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 55
Purpose of ARB RegulationPurpose of ARB Regulation
1. Seek additional emission reductions from category
2. Reduce emissions for ozone attainment
3. Meet existing SIP commitment
2/25/20092/25/2009 66
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 77
Uncontrolled Emissions and Uncontrolled Emissions and ReductionsReductions
Crestliner Emissions Breakdown
0
10
20
30
40
Measured No Control Estimated EPAEnforceable Standards
Estimated ARBEnforceable Standards
gra
ms H
C Fuel Induction
Vented
Fuel Tank
Fuel Hose
40.4 g
17.7 g
10.9 g
• Breakdown of emissions from a 33 gallon 2006 MY Crestliner
• ARB is reducing emissions by improving technology to all four sources
2/25/20092/25/2009 88
Uncontrolled Emissions and Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions, cont.Reductions, cont.
Total Projected HC emissions and reductions based on current model
Pleasure Craft Emissions Breakdown (Annual Average)
46 TPD
37 TPD
15 TPD
24 TPD
61 TPD
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Uncontrolled EPA Enforceable ARB Enforceable EPA Reductions ARB Reductions
To
ns
pe
r D
ay
2/25/20092/25/2009 99
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 1010
Control Technology Test ResultsControl Technology Test Results Using Proven Automotive Control Technologies Using Proven Automotive Control Technologies
• Low Permeation Fuel Tank(Moeller Marine, <1.0 g/m2/day, roto-molded two layer)
• Carbon Canister(Delphi Marine, 0.84 g/liter)
• Low Permeation Fuel Hose(Arrow Hose and Tubing, <5 g/m2/day)
• Fuel Injection(Honda FI, 90HP)
2/25/20092/25/2009 1111
Controlled Technology Test Controlled Technology Test Results, cont.Results, cont.
• One MY 2006 Crestliner was used for all control technology testing
MY 2006 Crestliner Sportangler 1750 Test Results
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Days
Gra
ms
HC
Uncontrolled E6
Controlled with E6
Controlled with E10
2/25/20092/25/2009 1212
• Emissions reductions were calculated against an uncontrolled 2006 Crestliner with E6
• Averaged over seven 24-hour California summertime diurnal profiles
Fuel Type Average Emissions Reductions
E6 80%
E10 77%
Controlled Technology Test Controlled Technology Test Results, cont.Results, cont.
2/25/20092/25/2009 1313
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 1414
Refueling EmissionsRefueling Emissions
• Current inventory does not account for refueling emissions
• Estimated refueling emissions could be as much as 3 TPDBased on:– Population of 1.2 million– Daily fuel consumption
2/25/20092/25/2009 1515
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results • Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 1616
Draft Proposal – Key ElementsDraft Proposal – Key ElementsOptions for CertificationOptions for Certification
• Proposed Pleasure Craft regulation has two methods of certification:
1. Design-Based Standard – Requires specific components– fuel injection– low permeation fuel hoses– low permeation fuel tank– passively purged carbon canister
2. Performance Alternative – One standard for the complete system
• Based on a 72-Hour test (California Summer Profile)
• ORVR required for both options• The standard will be based on E10
– 90% California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline with 10% by volume ethanol
2/25/20092/25/2009 1717
Draft Proposal – Key ElementsDraft Proposal – Key ElementsStandardsStandards
Design RequirementsSection 2791.1(a)
Effective Date Model
Year
Fuel Hose Permeation
Grams/m2/dayROG
Fuel TankPermeation
Grams/m2/dayROG
Carbon Canister Butane
Working Capacity Grams/Liter1
Fuel Injection
ProductionCompliance
Phase-In
2012 and subsequent
5.0 1.0 1.4 Required* All Pleasure Craft
1. Design Based Standards
*Fuel Injection will be required for:• Greater than 200HP - MY2012• Greater than 50HP – MY2013• All Pleasure Craft – MY2014
2/25/20092/25/2009 1818
Draft Proposal – Key ElementsDraft Proposal – Key ElementsStandardsStandards
2.Performance Alternative Standard
Performance RequirementsSection 2791.1(b)
Effective DateModel Year
PLEASURE CRAFT Type Diurnal StandardGrams HC/day
2012 All PLEASURE CRAFT Types0.048 * Tank Volume (liters) +
0.97
2/25/20092/25/2009 1919
Draft Proposal – Key ElementsDraft Proposal – Key ElementsConcept for CertificationConcept for Certification
1. Evaporative System Builders (boat builders, manufacturers, dealers, etc.) must apply for an Executive Order of Certification
1. Build evaporative system with ARB EO approved components
2. Reference EO number in application form3. Submit application to MSOD4. EO is automatic upon submittal
2. Boat Manufacturer will submit test data for the whole system, ARB will issue an EO
2/25/20092/25/2009 2020
Concept for Certification- ExampleConcept for Certification- ExampleDealer CertificationDealer Certification
1. Dealer builds evaporative system with EO certified components
2. References EO numbers in registration form
3. Submits registration form to MSOD4. Boat is allowed for sale immediately
upon submittal5. Dealer will receive EO of Certification
within 45 days of submittal
2/25/20092/25/2009 2121
Draft Proposal – Key ElementsDraft Proposal – Key ElementsRequirements for ORVRRequirements for ORVR
• Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) is required for all Pleasure Craft in 2012– Fill necks must be compatible with gasoline
dispensers– Must control displaced refueling vapor from
escaping into the atmosphere
2/25/20092/25/2009 2222
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 2323
Request for Manufacturing CostRequest for Manufacturing Cost
• ARB is seeking cost information from manufacturers to refine cost estimates for:– Fuel Tanks– Fuel Hoses– Carbon Canisters– Fuel Injection– ORVR Compatibility
2/25/20092/25/2009 2424
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 2525
Evaluation of Cost EffectivenessEvaluation of Cost Effectiveness
ARB will:• Use cost estimates provided by the boat
and component manufacturers • Assume two levels of profit in calculating
increased retail cost• Use estimated fuel savings in overall cost
effectiveness calculation
2/25/20092/25/2009 2626
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 2727
Pleasure Craft SurveyPleasure Craft Survey
• Institute for Social Research, CSUS is currently performing a California Pleasure Craft usage and activity survey– Preliminary data will be available in March– Final report will be available in July
• The survey data will be used to update activity and usage in the Off-Road Model
2/25/20092/25/2009 2828
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 2929
Status of Inventory TestingStatus of Inventory Testing
• Inventory testing is on-going and will be completed in 2011
• PTSD will update the Off-Road model when inventory testing is finished
• Because of the urgent need for reductions the Pleasure Craft regulation will move forward with existing estimates
2/25/20092/25/2009 3030
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline• Objectives• Purpose of ARB Regulation• Uncontrolled Emissions and Reductions• Control Technology Test Results• Refueling Emissions• Key Elements of Draft Proposal• Request for Manufacturing Cost• Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness• Pleasure Craft Survey• Status of Inventory Testing• Comments and Contact Information
2/25/20092/25/2009 3131
Comments?Comments?
• We are specifically seeking comment on:1. Time needed for technology implementation
2. Concepts for certification
3. Manufacturing costs
4. Definitions in draft regulation
2/25/20092/25/2009 3232
ContactsContactsMonitoring and Laboratory DivisionMonitoring and Laboratory Division
(For Questions Concerning the Rule Development)(For Questions Concerning the Rule Development)• Scott Monday
– Project Co-Lead, Evaporative Control, Engineering, and Regulatory Development Section• (916) 445-9319, [email protected]
• Jim Watson– Manager, Evaporative Control, Engineering, and Regulatory Development Section
• (916) 327-1282, [email protected]
Planning and Technical Support Division(For Questions Concerning the Emissions Inventory)
• Satya Sardar– Staff, Off-Road Modeling and Assessment Section
• (626) 450-6137, [email protected]