12/10-11/1984 DOE/NRC Meeting Minutes on the Quality ... · 9:30 a.m. BWIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND...

e/. /'a n4 4 `k- Am -` 1-

c:2Department of EnergyRichland Operations Office

P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

DOCKET CONTROLCEN TLE R

'85 JAIN 28 Al ;5&

JAN 1 8 1985

Those on Attached List

Gentlemen:

DOE/NRC MEETING MINUTES ON THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MEEIING HELD IN RICHLAND,WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 10-11, 1984

For your information and files enclosed are the complete meeting minutes

and respective notes and viewgraphs of the subject meeting. If there are

questions regarding these minutes, please contact Mr. James E. Mecca of my

staff on FTS 444-5038 or (509) 376-5038.

Very truly yours,

a.,X L. Olson, Project ManagerBasalt Waste Isolation Project OfficeBWI :JEM

Enclosure

WM Record File./D/,_ -

W"A PrJicct /:0)Docket N4o. - _

PDR _____v __

LPUR L______

B503010339 850118PDR WASTEWM-10 PDR

/776

Distribution list for letter, DOE/NRC Meeting Minutes on the Quality AssuranceMeeting Held in Richland, Washington, on December 10-11, 1984, Olson toDistribution, January 18, 1985

Ms. Susan BilhornU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

Dr. Robert J. Wright f& 4-'Repository Projects BranchDivision of Waste ManagementU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

Mr. C. WilliamsBattelle Memorial Institute505 King AvenueColumbus, OH 43201

Mr. E. SulekRoy F. Weston, Inc.2301 Research Blvd.,Rockville, MD 20850

3rd Floor

Mr. F. R. CookU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRichland, Washington

Mr. David W. StevensWashington State Departmentof Ecology, MS PV-ll

Olympia, WA 98504

Mr. Allen V. Pinkham, ChairmanNez Perce Tribal Executive CommitteeBox 305Lapwai, ID 83540

Mr. Elwood H. Patawa, ChairmanBoard of TrusteesP. O. Box 638Pendleton, OR 97801

Mr. R. R. Jim, ChairmanYakima Tribal CouncilYakima Indian NationP. 0. Box 151Toppenish, WA 98948

Mr. J. B. HovisHovis, Cockrill, Weaver & BjurP. 0. Box 487Yakima, WA 98907

Dr. John W. BartlettThe Analytic Sciences Corporation1 Jacob WayReading, MA 01867

Mr. A. McElrath, Jr.RKE/PBP. 0. Box 23210Oakland, CA 94623

Mr. R. L. ShaubPacific Northwest LaboratoryRichland, Washington

William J. PurcellAssociate DirectorOffice of Geologic RepositoriesOffice of Civilian Radioactive

Waste ManagementWashington, DC 20585

D. L. Vieth, NNWSINevada Operations OfficeP. 0. Box 14100Las Vegas, NV 89114-4100

J. 0. Neff, SRPOU. S. Department of Energy505 King AvenueColumbus, OH 43201

S. Mann, CRPChicago Operations OfficeU. S. Department of Energy9800 South Cass AvenueArgonne, IL 60439

XC: A <7 g fAe6,Ie/,D 72-.2.,- ,. A e,

SUMMARY MEETING NOTES -DOE/NRC QUALITY ASSURANCE MEETING

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTRICHLAND, WASHINGTONDECEMBER 10-11, 1984

ATTENDEES: Attachment 1

BACKGROUND

This meeting is the first of a series of visits to the BWIP Site toreview and discuss the DOE QA program for the site characterizationphase and later phases. The primary purposes of the first visit werefor the staff to become familiar with the details of the DOE QA pro-gram, and to identify questions concerning implementation and inter-pretation of NRC QA requirements. The ultimate goal of the sitevisits is to achieve early agreement between DOE and NRC staffs onwhat constitutes an acceptable QA program for licensing.

The scope of review for the first visit was consistent with itsoverview nature. The DOE - Rockwell QA and Project Managementsystems and programs to be utilized before, during and after SiteCharacterization phase were presented. The DOE and NRC staffs dis-cussed implementation of various QA program requirements as applic-able to site characterization activities through examination ofdetailed technical procedures provided by Rockwell. J. Kennedy madea presentation on the NRC QA Review Plan and addressed subjects whichare expected to be difficult to incorporate into the DOE program. Inaddition W. Altman discussed IE's involvement in the high level wasterepository program and NRC policy and program development activitiesfor QA.

The agenda for the visit is presented in Attachment 2.

DEVELOPMENTS

BWIP Comments - None.

NRC Comments - Attachment 3.

Comments from other participating parties - None.

OPEN ITEMS

Both NRC and DOE/BWIP follow-up actions are contained in Attachment 4.

NRC presentation material is contained in Attachment 5. DOE presentationmaterial is contained in Attachment 6.

This report was agreed to by DOE and NRC prior to adjournment.

(/. A : I(V /DOE Date 1z1// ,'tef - f

NRC 4--e

4Z; ODate eaZ /{ezfflo

- -

ATTACHMENT 1 - ATTENDEESDecember 10 & 11, 1984

NAME AFFILIATION

E. B. AshEd SulekM. F. NicolR. D. HammondAlden McElrathPhilip GittingsHarry BabadGeorge EvansCarl Newton0. L. OlsonG. J. BrackenL. R. FitchR. R. HammondS. A. WiegmanR. L. SnowRon GertonR. M. SchwenkMichael KarolR. L. ShaubBillie Neth0. E. RyderD. G. PriceW. J. ApleyTom WoodsGeorgeAnn WoodRoger JohnsonRoy PrattJohn BoresWayne DelvinTed PetrieR. P. SagetR. E. MayS. S. BiehornJ. J. FuquayC. WilliamsVishnu SubrahmanyamM. E. LangstonB. G. ErlandsonD. G. FarwickJohn GrahamStan EcholsR. 0. KulchakL. L. CaldwellD. S. WardS. SutterJ. MeccaW. M. BlandJ. H. LevineL. ConnellJ. RussellM. R. Kreiter

Rockwell Hanford OperationsWestonRockwell Hanford OperationsRockwell Hanford OperationsRKE/PB, Oakland, CARKE/PB, Oakland, CARockwell Hanford OperationsRockwell Hanford OperationsDOE-HQDOE-RLDOE-RLRockwell Hanford OperationsRockwell Hanford OperationsRockwell Hanford OperationsRockwell Hanford OperationsDOE-RLRockwell Hanford OperationsDOE-RLPNLPNL/MCCPNLRockwell Hanford OperationsPNLRockwell Hanford OperationsCitizenRockwell Hanford OperationsMorrison-KnudsenMorrison-KnudsenWHCDOE-RLDOE-RLRockwell Hanford OperationsNRCBattelle NorthwestBattelle ColumbusRockwell Hanford OperationsU.S. DOE/OCRWM/HQRockwell Hanford OperationsWHCRockwell Hanford OperationsDOEM-KHanford Oversight CommitteeGeotrans for Yakima Indian Nation3NWRockwell Hanford OperationsNRCNASARockwell Hanford OperationsYakima Indian NationPNL

ATTACHMENT 1 - ATTENDEESDecember 10 & 11, 1984

NAME AFFILIATION

Richard Hudson DOE-RLMichael Karol DOE-RLCraig Walenga NRC-IEA. J. Bell DOE-RLJ. Kennedy NRCW. Altman NRCB. Cook NRC

ATTACHMENT 2

AGENDA

DOE/NRC QUALITY ASSURANCE MEETINGBASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT

December 10-12, 1984

Location: Holiday Inn1515 George Washington Way

Richland, Washington

December 10, 1984

8:15 a.m.

8:30 a.m.

9:30 a.m.

DOE INTRODUCTION AND WELCOMEIntroduce DOE/Contractor StaffsDiscuss goals for meetingHighlight-agenda for workshop

NRC INTRODUCTION AND DISCUSSIONIntroduce StaffDiscuss goals for meetingPresent review plan backgroundDiscuss NRC QA organization andresponsibilities

OVERVIEW - BWIP QUALITY ASSRUANCEProject QA PhilosophyDOE Safety & QA SystemBWIP Quality ProgramOrganizationResponsibi1tties

Project Management systems andcontrols

QA program developmentQA program assessmentIssues and major actionsImplementation(15 minute break when appropriate)

0. L. Olson

J. KennedyW. Altman

0. L. OlsonR. E. Gerton

12:00 Noon LUNCH

1:00 p.m. OVERVIEW1 - ROCKWELL QUALITY ASSURANCE E. B. AshPROGRAM FOR BWIPOrganizationRockwell Responsibilities as BWIPTechnical Manager

Current QA/Management SystemsIssues and Major ActionsQA/Management Systems DevelopmentChallenges Ahead

DOE/NRC QA Agenda -2-

3:15 p.m. BWIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLSMission DefinitionData Requirements IdentificationIssue CorrelationWork DefinitionTraceabilityData Base ManagementProject Document Hierarchy(15 minute break when appropriate)

T. W. Woods

5:00 p.m. ROCKWELL QA/MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSImplementationKey ActionsSchedules

M. F. Nicol

6:00 p.m. ADJOURN

December 11, 1984 RECONVENE

8:00 a.m.

9:15 a.m.

PROJECT OFFICE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLANReview and discuss major points,

including design and test controlgraded quality assurance recordsmanagement, etc.

Identify implementation plans, sched-ules and procedures

G. J. Bracken

BREAK

9:30 a.m. BWIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLSUsing examples, show how the

developing management systemswill control BWIP work from theinitial definition of top levelrequirements to the eventual per-formance of data gathering andanalysis activities.

E. B. AshT. W. Woods

11:00 a.m. QUESTIONS, ANSWERS, COMMENTS Al 1

12:00 Noon LUNCH

1:00 p.m. EXIT MEETING PREPARATIONParticipants caucus to pre-

pare for exit meeting

All

DOE/NRC QA Agenda -3-

3:30 p.m.

5:00 p.m.

EXIT MEETING (RECONVENE)Discuss meeting results and

conclusionsPrepare meeting minutes

All

ADJOURN

December 12, 1984

8:00 a.m. FIELD TOUR DEPARTS FEDERAL BUILDING

12:00 Noon TOUR ENDS WITH RETURN TO FEDERAL BLDG. - MEETING OVER

ATTACHMENT 3 - NRC COMMENTS

* As noted in the opening comments, this meeting was intended to beand has been primarily fact finding in nature and limited in scope.In our discussions we identified a number of areas where additionalfollow up and discussion between DOE and NRC staffs is needed.Examples noted in this meeting include procurement control, therole and interface of line QA activities versus independent QAactivities, interface between project management program plansand QA activities, software QA, and records management.

* DOE is currently modifying their QA program to meet NRC licensingrequirements. Many of the changes to the program are not scheduledto be completed until shortly before publication of the SCP. Be-cause work is in progress now which may be referenced in licensing,DOE needs to implement at the earliest possible time the changes tothe program which are now under way.

* Based on NRC staff findings in the Ford Amendment Study (NUREG-1055)and experience of the QA team members from NASA, the size of theDOE technical staff may not be sufficient to provide adequate over-sight of such a large and complex project. In addition, heavy useof contractors to supplement DOE staff may not provide the continuitywhich is required for the program.

* The NASA consultant to NRC noted that one successful approach toverifying quality of technical work is to use separate technicaldesign review teams to provide additional checks and balances overthose obtained through use of line organization personnel.

* DOE should clarify the definitions of Conceptual, Title I, Title II,and Title III designs as applicable for BWIP, and the schedules forcompletion of each.

* DOE indicated that USGS has not accepted the project QA requirements.Follow up on this item is needed by DOE.

* Based on NASA experience, a central system for identification offailures, nonconformance reports and other problem areas is usefulin helping to identify root causes of problems.

* DOE recognized that further development work is necessary to bringgreater definition and refinement to their proposed trend analysisfor QA.

* In follow up meetings, it will be important to develop a betterunderstanding of how important design information and test pro-cedures will be verified as having been implemented correctly.Additional information will also be needed on the organizationsperforming this verification (i.e., line or QA) and the extentperformed by each. Verification steps should be specificallyidentified in the various test plans or procedures for collec-tion of important data and should be identified in appropriatedesign documents.

ATTACHMENT 4 - OPEN ITEMS

* DOE will be developing an approach for three important and inter-related areas; the scope of items and activities covered by theQA program (that is those items important to safety and wasteisolation); development of a graded QA approach for items andactivities commensurate with their importance to safety and/orwaste isolation; and qualification of existing data for licensingutilizing results of the first two investigations. NRC staffrecognizes the ultimate importance of these activities to licens-ing and recommends DOE work closely with NRC in regard to develop-ment of these approaches.

* The DOE discussed use of Readiness Reviews during site characteri-zation. In-reactor licensing, some utilities believe it advanta-geous to have early NRC involvement in these readiness reviews sothat NRC feedback and problem identification is obtained in atimely manner. DOE should consider the potential benefits of earlyinvolvement of NRC in this type of activity. NRC staff will forwardto DOE additional background information on this approach and isprepared to discuss this matter further with DOE.

* Based on needs of licensing, some amount of verification and/orreplication on data collected in the laboratory and the field isnecessary. Additional detail in this area is required to be ableto support licensing.

ATTACHMENT 5

NRC QUALITY ASSURANCE

SITE VISITS

DECEMBER 10-19, 1984

J. E. KENNEDY

1

O PRELICENSING CONSULTATION AND GUIDANCE PROGRAM

O GOALS FOR QA VISITS

0 QA REVIEW PLAN

2

PRELICENSING CONSULTATION

AND GUIDANCE PROCESS

O 10 CFR 60 PROCEDURAL RULE

o NWPA

O EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES AND TIMELYRESOLUTION

3

IiLwISSUE TRACKING

SYSTEM

I/N

-ISITE SPECIIfICGUIDANCE I-

I CFR 60 1BROAD I

SSvUEm PERFORMANCE |OBJECJIVE8 |

-0 ADDITIONALRULEMAKING

FOAMAtL.CLOSE OUT

ISSUES

GENERICTECHNICALPOSITIONS

NRC HLW LICENSING GUIDANCE PROGRAM' 4'

PRINCIPALGUIDANCE MECHANISM

SCP/SCAPROCESS

SUPPLEMENTARYGUIDANCE MECHANISMS

SITE TECHNICALPOSITIONS

(STP'S)

DOCUMENTEDTECHNICAL MEETINGS/TECHNICAL LETTERS

SITE SPECIFICLICENSING GUIDANCE

' '!

TECIIN I CAL REV I EWS/WORKSIHOPS(FY 80-84)

BWIP NTS SALT GENERICOVERALL SITE/FIELD REVIEW 3 3 3GEOLOGY 2 1 1GEOCIIEMISTRY 2 3 1 2HYDROGEOLOGY

7 3 1WASTE PACKAGE 2 1 1DESIGN (UNDERGROUND TESTING) 5 1 2 1PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 1 _1

2TOTAL 22 12 10 5

nECEMBER 1984

GOALS FOR QA VISITS

O FACT-FINDING AND FAMILIARIZATION WITH DOE PROGRAM

O EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ISSUES

O DISCUSSION OF QA REVIEW PLAN

O ULTIMATELY, TO HAVE A DOE QA PROGRAM IN PLACE WHICHWILL ADEQUATELY ASSURE THE QUALITY OF SITECHARACTERIZATION PHASE WORK

QUALITY ASSURANCEREVIEW PLAN

O REASONS FOR DEVELOPMENT

O PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT

O CONTENT

O RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER QA GUIDANCE

0 FUTURE PLANS

5

PURPOSES

O 10 CFR 60 SUBPART G - USE APPENDIX B, 10 CFR PART50 "AS APPLICABLE AND APPROPRIATELY SUPPLEMENTEDBY ADDITIONAL CRITERIA..."

O RECOGNIZES THAT REPOSITORY IS NOT A REACTOR

0 DEFINE STAFF ACTIONS

6

PROCESS

O IE/NMSS JOINT EFFORT

O REACTOR SRP, CHAPTER 17

O DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, JULY 1983 -MUCH INTEREST, FEW COMMENTS

O MEETINGS WITH DOE

O FORD AMENDMENT STUDY, APRIL 1984 - 60NEW COMMENTS

0 FINAL ISSUANCE, JUNE 29, 1984

7

CONTENTS

O DIFFERENT FROM REACTOR SRP WHICH ADDRESSESONLY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION IN SAR

O GENERAL - INTRODUCTORY TEXT

- DESCRIPTION OF ONGOING WORK

- NRC REGULATIONS

- APPLICATION OF QA TO GEOTECHNICAL WORK

- DESCRIPTION OF NRC REVIEW PROCESS

- FIGURES

O SPECIFIC - APPENDIX A

- 18 CRITERIA TAILORED TO DOE, SC PHASE

8

IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES

O HARDWARE QA VS DATA QA, E.G.

- INSPECTIONS- NCR'S

O SCOPE OF ITEMS AND ACTIVITIES COVERED BY PROGRAM-THOSE IMPORTANT TO SAFETY AND WASTE ISOLATION

O QA OF EXISTING DATA j

O LEVEL OF DETAIL IN PROCEDURES

O INDEPENDENCE OF QA ORGANIZATIONS

O RECORDS - PRELIMINARY VS FINAL

O DESIGN CONTROL - WHEN DOES IT START?

O GRADED QA

0 REPLICATION

9

RELATIONSHIP TO NQA-1

O REVIEW PLAN - GREATER SPECIFICITY AND LEVEL OFDETAIL FOR DOE SITE CHARACTERIZATION PHASE

0 NQA-1 REVISIONS REQUIRED

10

FUTURE PLANS

O NQA-1

O FORD AMENDMENT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS

O WILLIAM BLAND STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS

O EXPERIENCE AT SITES

O CONSENSUS STANDARDS - ASME/ANSI 2.20, NQA-1AND ANS-2.24

0 CONFIGURATION CONTROL

*11

"EVIE~f _ HtAf

DEfINtPROORAM _ DEVEOP lESI PiEPARE IESI PERIORM D(ICUMENI ANAIYE _ PEPAIIE E I v

EIIEMU I SPtNi _ PiE AS _ T ES IS IEST RESIRfS ST ASis REP(IRS E * teviewBASES) ON SUIEISUtS. DttINEINFOHMAlUONSED

NEEDS AND INIERNAttYPIIOGRAM Deign- how ,o..n. liell,, it' a .'*$ talI Co plete Sst ltolw DoeUnnett less ra dl Aneltye l semIte. Repoe t Ihm to

OBJECTIVf S lion needed will be sld docinnlerst th,. ingpl. Ih t a*c.edingi to Wse keet Incding tgs nl conutlonet---I -d @1 t---test cIncludin 14e6pnoledula; psocadu. o nd OA Gus Of del- d.wn Pllm 6. ult.

1.. otlVctle t pupoa.. GA a, sequlsed equlenla 1 Accepl.blIIf os dole enddin U nllal lon;,SDe o. 1l a.ocldu$e. ActioI take4 an o O th* dtel obuee de

nSaded 1., * tecil dlc-l - Tat dae Ipton. Eq d: 1netR Adne o dl peb.dte obmiput paneeded. l,, ait,f,holGl JTesl~t ds.pl.O qtme Adentleenletetv ead In*tamall.. Cot. lieptioiimon ae to Eppected vsoullt Iasittctlona on tehnical aA n 4om u othav

.Mv 1* oflt epecmtic ITgot psocedure Pqlpnenl optfsllon Ipe .el..e. l t ui il tel othei*nd temnal psononn lienlea. Includb - ii po niblittlol CatIatlan annd t.eanall PI ""` oAn00 i

Paersonnel esuminhanta. atun A aemdenie,- Pupse Ch6edlila Accept-tcet ICle aD d lceelcel- aeupe - Hposte Ite(l0on cedla lost- Desefltt..n ol mu~k - Itelepenc- Presequblelt lest

SpecIlc iee-dseninnl fuallty Aesane conditIon.Int1eiec.6 admn101sleaIlvo Doceumenteton

- Fquip ent a*d plocedumst peorennellOtle. -A lechiicel lequ lm*net

- Miletone. procedusat 4 OA. *dnmalsiatellveIPee. revlewi procedus

GA. fechnicalptoced.e...Ipee;se.lewi

-OA dl klt tv ploCed.l.s tnclude pocedu,- to,: ill docu lne collc Os12 docunsn- d l ucto. pocedue.. SnOL de wluJ;131 contol of mateutole. equipmenl. and eatnicov; 141 u-- li qualified peacnalt Itl1 Inapectione; il dcutnelwd 1te1 plane; III Connrol leteq ilpmeni; gol contol of samptes: Itl nonconformhOCe ,eiol; 1101 o li eodiv acion: fillP pe*e vlew Ihlbh 0anagement *.,d lechnieall;

Jill' audita,

GA ecli-rlcet poe-dune Include tts, actual tn-a *nd * a ps. 0euwa Ibolh niOtt9e...u.. t and tcs-1.,cel.

SCOPE Of DIAGRAM:To st.ow chwonoiogy of *,eml In deveolplnt Pll a .tlung plogreo

PURPOSE ofF DIAGOAM:Il1 To *how a b,*.Kdown sequence ol d.veilopnmen u plan. o I.-wo pOlm Ul mealy .c.... teeP -eae bV NIIC 121 to 1.ow 15-hc v.71v-l-,*nl

of GA. boll. ed nlnilietivo and technical. In each *1t1 nt psoglnm

1 IetIr(f 3

SUMMARY

O CRITERIA FOR REVIEW NOW IN PLACE

O SITE VISITS WILL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR NRC STAFFTO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH DOE PROGRAM

0 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES WILL BE IDENTIFIED

12

ATTACHMENT 5

A/

b/iv Do R.

-S

-z .t

t4) 43t-

&A) it z; , of l So)Ridj eu

LU. Armm1j (X-C)

-

(NPC.to

INi/Z

_I55S

. . ,

I /7FI 'Si-

- if%12isPff,

-

U--- I I I I

I. /L// he-v -�,& r /I C eft f AdA /�lw � 0 I #R

0 1 1 ro h&,5 Po/Cy lCOzR4 A- 004

. /V 55 7/kol , m nt r7Ic crm040f or 4QsA

LQAm

56oon Goo-OP14JOSHo *

P0Aey

sp¢R4 S *A PJ'A

code PA K*0 A ?t Mo

~~At. 9: , ;.."M 'i"; r, " , , �t, 1,l 221,j:.; : , .. , , f.

I :. aLLI!

fIDRPMENDIIENT STUDY .. f

Di OF PROJCT OF9! 0TR QlkMENT

4 i,

I .1

~APKOF NDESTANil$ yrPPO~CrOF ~t~ATQ~ ~qIREENT .1

'O~ VER PKIANCE Q~::jo"TPJqR~ .'. .- i-e~ILV~ 0 ECfl~pPR~4 g.:~)f ''~

MA~y rMDI~f OtI.~ w~v viAKJIWI' tK-

LACK OF INVOL.VEMENT .,

Pf$INO 9PQruI~9pILTv, MIUTED Acop nTApIIT ';"VIEW OF QA AS ANOTHER REWUATORY REQU kP"fT, N9 AK NAGWINT'10*' 'IOI O AS NECESSARV fOOLICENSINO ..

'TA KgTTLE"YNRH)* *.:: '9fft4LE SENSE OF $C

f.%J.ANCE ON NRC TQ P9TICT-PROBLEJMS

tT ..

4',4444 .t�.

P,

II'' *i*

p.. .

...

�--- .�

.1.F ***,�

4 .. 4...,1'* 'p.

.4

.,t*.� p...

4....

� i*p'

''4,

*1*

4' .I'

14'- *� 4*1.4

4.

� ':A. �

�. ,.�.

9.

V.''. *'

~~En AM4ENDM4ENT Ilya kAt

.,,

CA , Wl w*

1. l I,..*

CNANGJ1I) PUPLI jA Q'~ V. l

MOAgPIREI~I~f4T$UC .

FIUE TOi AP Al

ASOSUMP~~ P?~TION O FR QAVF AF IPDU$T WNETN

FOU N P ,N T XESEO ESG N CONTRUTIO

C FANIUR TORECREWI'.IR,:)

4 '-1a

4 ~ 4

V. ; ~.i.

ki A

A.-

M*N Y '-i

nftg~k4t*1 k A

Y. JJ.

~ SA A~GEEN.TO S

T ~ to- *lalQl

~.. n.,

.:*~ ".r- a *,~* , . - ' . J ~ 4~4* ~ *~* 4 ~ 4* -f \al1"

4

10"

,01 NRCQA

R EADINI

Ste *O.

. "l

I 4~¾* E ~ 4 5

:p ~ ii 7I:'.... I 5

:SS REVIEW$ 5. . 44iSJ'S

*5,.. j . *5. I iS

S-v.l

'. �w �, ��1. .I. 1 : ., , ..., . I

I . . . , .

4,. �

. I . ,

.,I

. . t .

. . Iri'l

,I ,

Or,.

tet;REGULATOR

F IAUTOR LESSOI

...

4 44

'M..

4 jJ~j I4NAQfMENT BE~PNIV

4O94EPONSIDLE"FOR,0

JWSONS APPL.ICABLE TI N N*~ P

REACTOR ACTIVITIES

A VW

NQA I itr ,.

riK4* ~s W

Nq4�1

r

4�p

��4,

.

L I

12 I I, if.-."A', -IT 11 "n, �I L -0�111`1 I' ,I`W1,41M, 1;491�� Ml� llwk.. :

-- -7i. ��!f -�gr

I

I

iI

r

i

* .�.**

� p

- �* I

* :�,. �*. �-

* *, 7* ' *.-k4i;i;

* * �;*

0

* . . 0

* I.4�*. 0

*': *

* ,. .* *-.., V. S

4"

* . 4'***

X4,

REACTORA AR ,p;FfERE"T FROM' WOW$PST0~ES* :soe EA6y9RE fW APPLJCIO qIAA~v~T$

"RAC N1EWD BO EC tE MORE FAM14fj1 V~t to P.ROGRIVIS

DOE hEEDS 4~CM MR ~tdI 1hN~PLCE

NRC APPROACPJJQQA OFINt MODIFIF9 Al A .P$1LT OF FORD STUE~

SAP A WeS~.JN POCUMEI1T TO REG10 PROE

OPENNESS . t I

COMMUNICATQTOM. ..

%I

* ,. -. f7j , .4 -n

.

!

ATTACHMENT 6

W1 T\U.S. DEPARTMENTOF ENERGY

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICE

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

QUALITY ASSURANCE MEETING


RICHLAND, WASHINGTON

- S s BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICEQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

AGENDADOE/NRC QUALITY ASSURANCE MEETING

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTDECEMBER 10-12, 1984

HOLIDAY INN1515 GEORGE WASHINGTON WAY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON

December 10, 1984

8:15 a.m.

8:30

9:30

12:00 noon

1:00 p.m.

2:00

4:00

5:00

DOE Introduction and Welcome

NRC Introduction and Discussion

Overview - BWIP Quality Assurance

Lunch

Overview - Rockwell Quality AssuranceProgram for BWIP

BWIP Management Systems and Controls

Rockwell GA/Management Systems

Adjourn

DOE

NRC

DOE

Rockwell

Rockwell

Rockwell

I BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICEQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN




December 11, 1984

8:15 a.m.

9:30

11:00

12:00 noon

1:00 p.m.

3:00

4:30

Review and Discuss Project OfficeQuality Assurance Plan

Review and Discuss Implementation ofBWIP Management Systems and ControlsQuestions, Answers, Comments

Lunch

Exit Meeting Preparation

Exit Meeting (Reconvene)

Adjourn

DOE

Rockwell

All

All

All

December 12, 1984

8:00 a.m.

12:00 noon

Field Tour - Depart

Return to RichlandEnd of Meeting and Tour

I

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICEQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

PROJECT OFFICE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

* REVIEW QA PLAN CONTENT

* DISCUSS ISSUES RELATIVE TO NRC REVIEW PLAN

o IDENTIFY IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS

DECEMBER 11, 1984


QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

SECTION I - QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

SECITON 11 - QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN INDEX

SECTION III - PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES


SECTION I - QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TOPIC PAGE

INTRODUCTION 1

ORGANIZATION 1

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 11

DESIGN CONTROL 14

PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 15

INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 17

DOCUMENT CONTROL 17

CONTROL OF PURCHASED ITEMS AND SERVICES 18

IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS 18

CONTROL OF PROCESSES 18

INSPECTION 18

TEST CONTROL 18

CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 19

HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 19

INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 19

CORRECTIVE ACTION 19

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 20

AUDITS 20


ORGANIZATION

* DELEGATIONS TO PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

* PROJECT OFFICE VS QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATIONRESPONSIBILITIES

* REVIEW PLAN DISCUSSION

IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS AND ACTIVITIES IMPORTANT TO SAFETYAND WASTE ISOLATION

LINE VERSUS STAFF RESPONSIBILITY FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE

PERSONNEL PERFORMING VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES

* IMPLEMENTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

1.2 QA MANUAL PREPARATION AND MAINTENANCE

6.2 STOP WORK

.4

0ASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICE CQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN 1

BWIP QA PROGRAM MATRIX

DOE-RL

1. ORGANIZATION X

2. QA PROGRAM X

3. DESIGN CONTROL X

4. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL X

5. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS X

6. DOCUMENT CONTROL X

7. CONTROL OF PURCHASED ITEMS & SERVICES X

B. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS D

9. CONTROL OF PROCESSES D

10. INSPECTION D

11. TEST CONTROL D

12. CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT. D

13. HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING D

14. INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS D

15. CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING ITEMS X

16. CORRECTIVE ACTION X

17. QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS X

18. AUDITS X

TECHNICALMANAGER

x

xxxxxxxxx

-xxxxxxx

X

CONST ARCHITECTMANAGER ENGINEER

x x

x x

x x

x

'x x

x x

x x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

xxxx

x

xx

KEY TO IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES.

X = RESPONSIBLE D - DELEGATED - = NOT APPLICABLE

L


PROGRAM


ITEMS AND ACTIVITIES IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OR WASTEISOLATION

GRADED QUALITY ASSURANCE


1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT


1.3 QA PROGRAM ASSESSMENT

7.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE TRAINING

8ASALTWASTEISOLATIONPROJECTOFFICEQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

DESIGN CONTROL

* DISCIPLINED PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ANDCONTROLS ARE A KEY TO DESIGN CONTROL


PROCESS FOR CONTROL OF DESIGN SITE CHARACTERIZATION WILLBE IN PLACE PRIOR TO 10/85

PEER REVIEWS IN USE


5.1 CHANGE CONTROL

5.2 DOCUMENT CONTROL

5.3 DESIGN REVIEWS

5.4 DESIGN CONTROL - HARDWARE

5.5 DESIGN CONTROL - SITE CHARACTERZATION

3.1 DOCUMENT REVIEWS

5.6 PEER REVIEWS

- BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICEQUAOTY ASSURANCE PLAN

DESIGN AND SITE CHARACTERIZATIONCONTROL

m OCRM PROGRAM TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS BASELINED ANDCONTROLLED BY DOE HQ - GRD

* SITE SPECIFIC TECHNICAL BASELINE WRITTEN FOR BWIP ANDAPPROVED BY DOE HQ

* FUNCTIONAL DESIGN CRITERIA/TECHNICAL PLANS BASIS FORFACILITY EQUIPMENT DESIGNS

* DESIGN/PEER REVIEWS AT REGULAR INTERVALS- COMMENTS DOCUMENTED AND DISPOSITION OF COMMENTS AGREED TO

PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION

* CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED

* QA AUDITS OF THE DESIGN/SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROCESS

* PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN - CLEARLY ESTABLISHES ROLES ANDRESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL ORGANIZATIONS


PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL


NONE

* IMPLEMENTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

4.1 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT REVIEWS AND APPROVALS


INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS


NONE


1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT


- BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFiCE - -QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN 1

DOCUMENT CONTROL


NONE




3.2 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL SYSTEM

5.2 DOCUMENT CONTROL


CONTROL OF PURCHASED ITEMSAND SERVICES


DELEGATIONS

VERIFICATION OF SERVICES


2.1 - 2.4 AUDIT SERIES (4 PROCEDURES)

2.5 SURVEILLANCE

2.6 READINESS REVIEWS


I


QA PROGRAM ELEMENTS DELEGATEDTO OTHERS FOR IMPLEMENTATION

* SAMPLE AND HARDWARE IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL

* SPECIAL PROCESSES

^ INSPECTION

* TEST CONTROL

* MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT

* SAMPLE HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING

* INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS

%� .0.0

2BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICE

QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

NONCONFORMANCES


DELEGATIONS TO CONTRACTORS FOR CONTROL OFNONCONFORMING ITEMS

SIGNIFICANT PROJECT NONCONFORMANCES REQUIRE DOEAPPROVAL


8.1 NONCONFORMANCES

oll

@+4

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFiCEICQUALITV ASSURANCE PLAN

CORRECTIVE ACTION


FOLLOWUP TO A CORRECTIVE ACTION PERFORMED BY LINEAND/OR QA ORGANIZATIONS


6.1 CORRECTIVE ACTION

I

I BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFiCEQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS


DELEGATION TO ROCKWELL TO OPERATE BASALT RECORDSMANAGEMENT CENTER

DOE RECORDS


9.1 PROJECT QUALITY RECORDS

f

-- BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICE


AUDITS

E REVIEW PLAN DISCUSSION

NONE

E IMPLEMENTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

2.1 VERIFICATION PLANNING

2.2 AUDITOR QUALIFICATIONS

2.3

2.4

INTERNAL AUDITS

EXERNAL AUDITS


SUMMARY

QA PLAN PROJECT OFFICE APPROVED

QA MANUAL ISSUED AS CONTROLLEDDOCUMENT

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES

AUGUST

FEBRUARY

1984

1985

JUNE 1985

PROJECT OFFICE QA PROGRAM FULLYIMPLEMENTED

OCTOBER 1985

- - - - BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICEQUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

TABLE OF CONTENTSPROCEDURE

NUMBER TITLE

1. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS

1.1 Project Management Procedure Development

1.2 QA Manual Preparation and Maintenance

1.3 QA Program Assessment

2. VERIFICATION

2.1 Verification Planning

2.2 Auditor Qualifications

2.3 Internal Audits

2.4 External Audits

2.5 Surveillance2.6 Readiness Reviews

3. DOCUMENT CONTROL

3.1 Document Reviews

3.2 Correspondence Control System

4. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL

4.1 Procurement Document Reviews and Approvals

0 = Issued for Implementation D = Drafted and Being Reviewed

REVISION

0

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

- = To be DrafltedI

I

'kBASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT OFFICE


PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT)PROCEDURE

NUMBER

5.

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6

TITLE

DESIGN CONTROL

Change Control

Document Control

Design Reviews

Design Control - Hardware

Design Control - Site Characterization

Peer Reviews

CORRECTIVE ACTION

Corrective Action

Stop Work

PERSONNEL TRAINING

Quality Assurance Training

REVISION

-

6.

6.1

6.2

7.

7.1

8.

8.1

NONCONFORMANCES

Nonconformances

RECORDS

Project Quality Records

-

9.

9.1

0 = Issued for Implementation 1: = Drafted and Being Reviewed - = To be Drafted0 = Issued br Implementation D = Drafted and Being Reviewed - = To be Drafted

BASALT WAST-E ISOLATION PHOJECT

0 (O) H f E PK] Tr o IN IT M L.. X . . . . . .x -: -i

u E Gal pr I [I Gcl Ae R- n h zf I m K D E IF a Im o T a 0ID) 00 C Uf Mk IE H I /A U O 0 IM

0 UJ U L H H E

TECI INICAL WOltK FLOW* INFORMATION & DATA NEEDS ANALYSIS DOCUMENT

REGULATORY CRITERIA & ISSUES CORRELATION DOCUMENT* SCIENCE PLAN(S)* TEST FACILITY OPERATING PLAN(S)* DATA ACQUISITION RECORD REPORT- DATA EVALUATION REPORT

EXAMPILE 4ECI INICAL PROCEDURESFIELD TEST PROCEDURE

LABORAF[ORY TEST PROCEDURE

CIJNTI-IW l'OINTSWOCRK S-l(OPSPlER Rl EVIEWS

* DESIGN & SAFETY REVIEWSI TEST INSPEC TION & HOLD POINTS

- READINESS REVIEWS

IPROiCTLMSMIn

I0WIP TECHNICAL APPROACHSystow Efvuiaeerid'v # PI&?

BUIPtined Geologic Disposal

SYSIVW IITSSIO I

1134a , A -,,, ss I)E4

Science

Tprahbir-A WnrLe Fliow

X Work-Flo w-or Tests Test Fiity 02erjtknv Plons. .. ......... . ... .. ...... . . . . . .. ............

i. c

Ireawci Proceares

Work Flow

, .4 .Afta AwuisitiL I

I . . ... . ... ... . ..... .;

torI Analyses 1tu

Tec/ical Praceciires . ... .. ....

' ~~~. ... .. ,,......h

i'Vvt topertfawxwc assessnt4

sfte feasibilij cewoAtisze£ dart pickiws for lesipi

w e is sSss su

[D~flp

I r -ik -I

BVIPhined Geologic Disposal

SYSTEHI h1TSSItJ

I1WOP TECHNOCAL APPROOACH

:Definition of Project Mawagement approacl.Licensing prograq QA progra etoa

Project grwavw'nt pRa?

. 2 _ are 110

F'PR-ojEC-TBWDP TECHNUCAL APPROACH

istea &Vineewrirn iVwowt PlAr

Definition of Project managment approachILicensing progra% OA prograu etc

.... . ...... . . . . . . .Abrupwt i*vamt Rayo

I -1Ptined Geologic Disposal

SY'SIo rnssirn I

9;t, A&wiik Aneiq hc I~. e A_....>-.n

. Reagent

Identify iAll Information a Data

.. Needs ,

STRUCTURE Of SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS TREE

SMSUIM1UNCTIONS

Mu SIONlOf PIDINh I

SYSTIMMI QlIIREMifTS

MulION jlilAIINIORMAJION

Nf IDS ANDDATA NEEDS

(tIN'pluRItiZIoI

PS84 JOQS I

FIDA]MO&T[ON] aD aM NEE

-] LI

i- 1 1 CNTAIMENT

System Requirements Tree Process Identifies"ReuipremenL" for the Dined Geologic DisposalSystem to Provide Containment

F Pw.Ec-r I

BVIPHined Geologic Disposal

SYSTEti ITSStJ

IBWIP TECHNICAL APPROACHS>starv &Vi~xvrineri A buwxt Flynn

! ......................... ...... ., "'I.... I'll. "I'll"I'll,. I. I... I . . I...tI . I;Definition of Project management waproacs I

Licensing prograq OA progrsi etc

- %uJ.,toiy teriq S t!ses*sarta .. .,a,.1,, .......~. ..... ..IN ,0 .;-~e i ss

Identify 4-, CorrelateAll Inforaation 5 Data Information & Data Needs with

Needs Regulatory Criteria & Issues. . .~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ........ ... ............ .... ... ...... ... .

Ffust Parenwot Mla?

UFrfVIraor OroMuFrOM

FRIFWAML^ OIR (('3MWrEFRM

r--TV ] -System Requiiellents lfee Process Identifies'Requireie-lit, for the Hined Geologio DisposalSystem to Provide Containwmnt

Correlation (in Data Needs Analysis & Correlation Document)with All Regulatory Criteria Establishes hostStringent minima/maxima Constraints (floor aInd/or ceilingi

[P}CCW[L~rM ITEMM &L ,m e

System correlRequiorernents.b, mat_

Tree

10 CFfi 6U i;

\ orelxMal

IU CFH 960 U \ n,

Mission Plan re

GENERIC REQUIFtMENTS D)OCUIENT -. I_

ation

State & localregulatiois 8

codes ___

other I

issues -

ME SUJSEMC V ACICESS/AG £4Cas REi;MAf.Av COMAS:S/7s --SPfCh7/C ,qfTEPfMTAT/a'4

- RFscmSrQ/1Yp a- ca nl cr

IL]M __

l1ined Geologic DisposalSYSTEI" hISSii

IWOP TECHNUCAL APPROACHSysta7> E~,inee i 1U&AS wx- PJvy -

Definition of Project mnaagtinent approach.Licensing progrart (A progra. etc

: . .. .......... ..... ,itnvect t t P~I

4Ibq A0ko, V.44(ork.p 4 ,4v 4 S44sSxaar7 ~~aa-, ti77

Identify CorrelateAll Information ata Informtion 1 Data Needs with

teeds Regulatory Criteria 1 Issues. .... .... .. ... ........ . . . . .

Determine which partwoeters exedaminate isolation performance.

constructibility, 6 design decisions

Consolidate & Prioritize Data Needs

... .... . .. . .. . .. . ...... . ........... ..... i

W_ I k

[ FoECT |I1ISW

HWUP TECHNICAL APPROACHSJstaw EIVJneerjlV var t P.la"

f1ined Geologic DisposalSYSitH hTISSION

b(Ma 4'&h.sis I

..... ... . . ....... .. . ......... ....... I............ ..,Definition of Project management appro

Licensing progra' OA progra etc........ ... .......... I....... ................ ..... ....... ...... .....,

Project Alsrt Pmin&%dat..tvy Cr.iter ia 4 Iss es

Identify 4, Correlate

All Information 6 Data Information & Data Needs withNeeds Regulatory Criteria & Issues

Determine wAich parametersdominate isolation performance. Plans

constructibility, A design decisions

Consolidate & Prioritize Data Needs!

Determine the level of certaintyto which each doginant parameter

must be understood

I'4i

t

...... ..... .I ..... -..... ........... . ...... ... !i -- 's' tlirsl., W ut p k i. ..... ,.

F.,&CT In~ss-uf

BWIP TECHNICAL APPROACHSys c efvinxerirf /,Yrc P012w

a.EWIP

lined Geologic DisposalSYSTE1I hISSIOJ

Catd A.'h'a. AMd~ysis I

Definition of Project management approactt* Licensing progran OA prograf, etc

t ......... t ... ... . ........... ............Projet nwtta PI&I

R. .,.taR..

Identify 4 t CorrelateAllInfoination a Data Information & Date Needs with

A Needs Regulatory Criteria & Issues~. ....... .. ..... .... ...... .. ..

Determine which parmeters Sci&AL-edominate isolation performance.

constructibility. & design decisions

Consolidate & Prioritize Data Needs

Determine the level of certaintyto which each dominant paraeter

must be understood

Define the technical effortto characterize eadc doaunant parameter:

itgCr.0 4 Iss.S41tidin 7&~I

i

(l)select data source arid acquisition Method.eg. in-situ test. field survey, study, etc.

(2)determhne required data swaple size,spatially and chronologically, toattain needed levels of confidence.

(3)define data acquisition requirementsexpectedresults, test ec4 Apipent. instrmientatioracceptibility critetia, contingency plans.etc.

(4)define data analysis method(s).(M)define methods to interpret results.(6)define methods to develop and verify

needed models and codes.

i

i

I... . . . .... ..' . ..I ... . ........o .. .F......o .* Te-Mial orkFlow

_ ---_

I

SIIPmined Geologic Disposal

SYSTEM ?IISSIGN

IWBOP TECHNICAL APPROACH>S,'tafii EfV_1kW1j,,V AAatt P1,w)

7Definition of Project uuiagement approachLicensing program OA progr ^ etc

Project tAwUjw&mt PJ&s/?e.x48trv C.ar-it.rid ,1 IssAe0 4,.

, n?/4W7tAn Aw i.S: I

. . ... rrel tio A'w ..Identify 4- Correlate

All Information & Data Information & Data Needs with,eeds | Reoulatory Criteria 6 Issues

Determine ktich parameters 5kiencedominate isolation performance.

constructibility, A design decisions

Consolidate & Prioritize Data Needs$

Determine the level of certaintyto which each doelinant parasrter

must be understood

Define the technical effortto characterize each dominant para&Iter:

(I)select data source and acquisition methodteg in-situ test field survey, study. etc.

(2)detersrdne required data sanple size,spatially and chronologically.toattain needed levels of confidence.

(3)define data acquisition requirements. expectedresults, test eqtipment instruwentatiortacceptibility criteria. contingency plans, eta.

(4)define data analysis eiethod(s).(5)define methods to interpret results.(6)define methods to develop and verify


Coaplete technical plarningu eg:task sequence network. define input/output interfaces.

identify interim & final conclusion doctmentation.

LimaUnlgic Work FfL__,_

i -f

UWOP TECHNDCAL APPROACHSystan El)neeri,'d1 /&viC Plor

-A

|Definition of Project managemnt approach.Licensing progro QA prograq etc

BWIPfined Geologic Disposal

SYSTE hISSMIMI

lbpilvect /XA~~t p1i7

t,, s * X2Aii:'s4 . R e4wy c i e i A ssgs s

Identify T CorrelateAll Information I Data Inforiiation & Data Needs with

Needs , Regulatory Criteria & Issues

Determine which parameters Sc.ens . Wark Fo fUst f5c.Uwty .t.t... .dominate isolation performance. PJ.s

constructibility, & design decisions .

Consolidate & Prioritize Data NeedsD .

Determine the level of certaintyto which each douinant parareter

wust be understood

Define the technical effortto characterize each dominant parareter:

(l)select data source and acquisition Poethod,eg, in-situ test, field survey, study, etc.

(2)deternine required data saiiple size.spatially and chronologicallytoattain needed levels of conifidence.

(3)define data acquisition requiremnixts,expectedresults, test equipment- instrinentation.acceptibility criteriaxcontingency plans. etc.

(4)define data analysis method(s).(5)defire methods to interpiet results.(6)define methods to develop and verify


Complete technical planning; ea:task sequence network, define input/output interfaces.

identify interim & final conclusion doctmientation.............. ..... ............ .......

LrrAeIC~1iLAI 99fLiw____

L~mq

BWDP TECHNICAL APPROACHSjstan Engzneeruz fVt PJvn

,Definition of Project management approach.Licensing progra% QA progra% etc........... .... ...... ... .. . ..................... .. . ....................... ...

SWIPhined Geologic Disposal

SYSTEM HISSIONProject IaAnewt PJ&9

r . .Corrtlatign oocw~inCIdentify i , ,F'Correlate

All Information 6 Data Information & Data Needs withNeeds .Regulatory Criteria & Issues

................... .. . .. .. ......... . .. .... . . Work-Flow-for TTestsest cityqrarinf P1Deterrnine which parawrters ..... ...... ...... ............. .....

dominate isolation performance- R J-S Defica t n fcili t -St tyv

constructibility, & design decisions Aes its 'pkf)

Consolidate & Prioritize Data NeedsI

Determine the level of certaintyto which each dowinant paraieter

nist be understood

Define the technical effortto characterize each dominant paremeter:

(l)select data source and acquisition method.egL in-situ test, field survey, study. etc.

(Z)determine required data sanple size,spatially and chronologically, toattain needed levels of confidence.

(3)define data acquisition requirementsexpectedresults, test equipient. instruventatiormacceptibility criteria, contingency plans, etc.

(4)define data analysis method(s).(5)define methods to interpret results.(6)define methods to develop and verify


+Complete technical planning; eg:

task se~uence network, define input/output interfaces.identify interim & final conclusion docurentation.

. ............ -.............................. ........ ....... . .... ..

i'" raLWuikfh _

01WIP TECHNOOAL APPROACHI OECTA I~'t~ a t/S 2?trn i'w' '&9 Wwt Plan,lSSlC

BVIP -Definition of Project management approach. ilimed Geologic Disposal Licensing progrft OA program etc

SYSTEH hISSI ..... ... .. . .... ... ........... .. . i.f rojec't t a

Identify *-'** CorrelateAll Information 1 Oata i Information & Data Needs with

Needs Regulatory Criteria & Issues

*7 W ork-Flow-or-TstDeteradne which parameters ...... .,.

dominate isolation performance. PDan Define test facility r.st F~2libconstructibility. & design decisions madsi fictsin)

orsolid~ate & Prioritize Data tleeds Design test equipuent Design test facility1 instrunentation and/or modifications.

Determine the level of certainty i - rest Facilityto which each daidnant parameter i _ __ tsipn iscrtip~on ,Ad r AcIifps

must be understood procrnvic* actieun

Define the technical effortto characterize each dominant parameter;

(I)select data source and acquisition method.eg. in-situ test, field survey, study. etc.

(2)deterodine required data saple size.spatially and chronologically, toattain needed levels of confidence.

(3)define data acquisition requirsments. expectedresults, test equiapment, instrumentation.acceptibility criteria contingency plans etc.

(4)define data analysis method(s).(S)define methods to interpret results.(6)define methods to develop and verify


Conplete tecthnical planning; eg:task sequence network, define input/output irLtel fae:es,identify interim 6 final conclusion docullentation.

LI...h.l........iL.. ...

;PfOECT,TSS, II_4:;_ _*lii

0WIP TECHNICAL APPROACHSJs(rn £spneserivs A/Ieint Pln'

IDefinition of Project Bafbagemant approF Licensing prograat QA progran etc. . . .......... ... ..... . . .. ... ... ............. .. ..

MW'P11ined Geologic Disposal

SYSMEh MISSIMr _

Z19126

rta*s M'e.. 4-.s>.sis I.. . ... . . J(Pe~y ri£.[ .kq (*.<

Identify Corelate CAll Information 4 Data Information & Data Needs with

Needs Regulatory Criteria a Tsstes .... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. . .. ... . _....... ............. ........... .... .. ... _. . ....... ...... .................. ....... . .

. Work- fow for Tests- leSt ilitY 4ertin RJss

dominate isolation performance * Define test facilityconstructibility. & design decisions olifications -* test fadiuit |

Consolidate & Prioritize Data Needs Design test equipment Design test facility! & instrunentation andor modifications

Deteririne the level of certainty ! I * Failityto which each dofdnant paraneter g I L Asi Osrioti rest arility

must be understood

Define the technical effortto characterize each dominant pararseter:

prozradrtWct Y6 4WOdi Cs)

Complete installation check-out. calibration'test sequence & facility saintenance planning

(1)select data source and acquisition irethod.eg. in-situ test field survey. study. etc

(2)aetermine reqdired data sdnple size.spatially and chronologically, toattain needed levels of confidence.

(3)define data acquisition requirem-ents, expectedresults, test equipnoent. instrutentatiun.acceptibility criteria. contingency plans. etc

(4)Liefine data analysis method(s).(S)define methods to interpret results.(6)define methods to develop and verify

needed models and codos.

Coaplete technical planning; eg:Ask sequence network. define input/outpit interfaces,identify interJm & final conclusion docuientation.

...................

01y^ &mA k

WILIN Rowl Itrtinl

BASALT OPERATING PROCEDURES

CHANGE NOTICE

RHO-OWI.MA.4

Chang Notice No. 053

BOP No. C-4. 13

oata 01/26/84

Page I of It

supewosde N/A

A.'F'NcoX, ManagerSWIP QA

subiat. SOP C-4.13, SCANNING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICRSCOPE (STEM)

Make the following pen-and-ink changes to the subject procedure:

* Page 5 of 14;, Section 6.1.3, Item (3) Lines 1 and 2, replacethe .first sentence with the following: "Using a conmierciallYprepared TEM mesh grid bearing a carbon film, transfer..."

* Page 12 of 14, Section 8.0, Line 9, line out reference:"SOP C-4.20, Preparation of Carbon Films for rEM Grids'!

0

FILE THIS CHANGEt NOTICE ENi FRONT OF 30P -. 13 UNTIL 3EXT REVISIONI.

A41400-129 AN-114C)

RHO-SWI-MA-4

BASALT OPERATING PROCEDURERESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION: Engineered Barriers AUrHOR: C. C. Allen

Aaotwe YS UGmt~anmnSCANNING TRANSMISSION SCIENTIFIC

ELECTRON MICROSCOPE (STEM) TECHNOLOGIES

1.0 OBJECTIVE

This procedure describes methods, materials, equipment, and specialconditions required to prepare samples and safely operate the JEOL 200 CXscanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) laboratory in support ofthe Basalt Waste Isolation Project (SWIP). This procedure provides themeans for obtaining verifiable, reproducible, documented test data asrequired by AtlSI/ASME NQA-1.

2.0 APPLICABILImT

This procedure applies to all employees trained and authorized tooperate the equipment for the Materials resting Grouo (MTG), EngineeredBarrier Oepartment (EBD). This equipnent is located in Room 212 of the2101-4 Building, 200 East Area. This procedure does not qualify untrainedpersonnel in the techniques of sampling, 3reparing, aia testing of samoles Ior calculating or interpreting results.

3.0 0EFINmIONS

3.1 -RAN9MISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM)

The TEM describes a mode whereby a diffuse oeam of eleczrans is ai'owedto imoince on a sample, with the image of the transmitted electrons formeaon a fluorescent screen.

3.2 SCANNING 7RANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY 'STcM!

rhe STEM describes a mode 4iereby the electron ,ens configurationpermts scanning with a focused electron beam over the samole, with thetransmitted electrons being used to form an imace on a cathode raytube (CRT)

NOTE: This procedure has been completely revised.

;au isuw Suoeru uu oe Reviawe. 3v I ?0aq i No.I Deasue amana $eI

JEC 1983 I AUG 1982 -EIONIAL2 I a-

A.60O0.158 (R-5.731

RHO.8WI-MA4

BASALT OPERATING PROCEDURE

3.3 SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (SEM)

The SEM describes a mode Qiereby a focused electron beam is scannedacross the surface of the sample, with the resulting secondary electronsbeing used to form an image an a CRT.

3.4 SELECTED AREA ELECTRON OIFFRACTION (SAED)

The SAED describes a mode in which electron beams diffracted from asmall area of the Sample form a pattern an a fluorescent screen.

3.5 ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY (EDS)

The EDS describes a mode in which characteristic X-rays produced byinteraction of the electron beam with the sample are sampled and processedto allow identification of the samole's major elements.

3.5 TEM GRID (MESH OR SLOTTED)

A 7EM grid is a 3-mm-diameter disk of Cu, Ni, or Be, having a rmesninsert in a square pattern or a single slot. Grids are used for samplesumnort in the electron microscope.

4.0 :RESPONSIBILITIES

1.. MANAGER, &NG1NEERED 3ARRIERS OEPARTMENT (E30)

The Manacer, EBO, is responsible for overall testing and experimentsoerformed with the 700 CX. He is also responsible for approving thisorocedure.

d.2 MANAGER, MATERIALS TESTING GROUP (MTG]

The Manager, MTG, is responsible for maintenance of laboratoryequiament and for the safety of personnel working in the laboratory. Heis responsible for training of personnel in safety and emergencyprocedures and for evaluating the qualifications of persons to receiveauthorization to ouerate the 200 CX. The MTG Manager, under direction ofthe E30 Manager, is responsible for use and Planning of tests performedwith the 200 CX.

iar IsIud ISucertass" I Tsseo as eiveowa av I" No.

; DEC 1983 IAUG 1982 3 1 ENN -4 1

A-6000-058 . * A.S. .9

RHO"WI"MA-4


4.3 COGNITZANT SCIENTIST

Operators of the 200 CX are authorized by the Manager, MTG, upondemonstration of scientific education and specialized training thatprovide a thorough understanding of the uses and capabilities of theinstrument and the ability to analyze the data obtained. The cognizantscientist is responsible for using the instrument in a safe and efficientmanner, and for planning tests and experiments with the guidance andcollaboration of the MTG Manager for the purpose of microcharacterizationof solid materials. The cognizant scientist is further responsible torecord the data and label and store samples in accordance with proceduresin SOP C-4.3 for purposes of traceability. A minimum of 100 hours peryear electron beam "hands-Qn* time is required in order to maintainproficiency on the 200 CX.

5.0 SAFETY

3.1 SAFETY CMGNIZANCE

In the performance of work and in aeneral conduct, laboratoryoersonnel are to exhibit full cognizance of and resoect for the safetyhazards that exist with regard t laboratory equioment and rmaterials.Safety regulations specified in RH0-MA-221 also apply and must beobserved, in addition to Rockwell Master Safety Rules and soecific safetvregulations for this work posted in eac" laboratory. Entrance to thelaboratory is strictly controlled, in accordance with posted visitoraccess signs. All work is to be comaleted in accordance with 30P C-'.2.

5.2 EMER0GNCY SHUTDOWN

In case of emergency, the 200 CX can be immediately ana safely shutdown by pushing the red "Emergency Stoo" button on the left side of theooerator's console. Power to all instruments in the room can be turnedoff at the "S.7.E.M. Main Power SuoDolv circuit breaker an the 4alI to Theaoerator's left (Figure 1).

5.3 FIRE

The 200 CX laboratory and the sample preoaration laboratory areorotected by automatic water sprinkler systems. Portable Halon and C02fire extinguishers are located in the 200 CX laboratory to the rIght Of

Oat issue Suoenaoes 12P.0 I 7a Beviewvved Byv i Pa No.a oitea

DEC 1983 I AUG L.982 3IIE iN1ALaY 2 --a . -1-IIIAI I -;L -, .

A .. oo-o5as. .; R -5 91

RHO-SWI-MA4

8ASALT OPERATING PROCEDURE

the operator's console (Figure 1). A multipurpose dry chemical fireextinguisher is located in the sarple preparation laboratory next to thedoor into the 200 CX laboratory.

5.4 SPECIFIC SAFETY PRECAUTIONS

Precautions applying to specific portions of this procedure aredetailed in Section 6.0 below.

6.0 PROCEDURE

6.1 SAMPLE PREPARATION

5.1.1 General Considerations

The 200 CX has the capability to analyze oarticles or deposits insizes greater than a fev tens of angstronms. Therefore, any dust orcnemnical residue is a potential contaminant. To preclude dustcontamination, all samples should be prepared in the installed Taminarflow clean bench, and kept covered in individual oetri dishes "heneverpossible. All tools must be cleaned in a solvent prior to use. The onlysolvents acceptable for samole preparation are absolute ethanol, electron, icroscope (EM) grade acetone and ultraoure water. This water is producedbv the Sybron/Sarnstead filtration system and has a resistance exceeding'i megonms/cTI.

;.1.2 Preaaration of Rock for TEM/SiEM

(1) Samoles are received as petroaraphic thin seceions preparedaccording to 30P C-A.21. Sections for 7EM/SiiM should beorepared using Crystalbond cement.

(21 -xamine the section n an oatical -ricroscoDe to ie-Fne an Areaof interest aoproximately 3 x 3 mim.

(3) While observing the section in an oPtical microscooe, separatethe area of interest by carefully pressing at points around theperiphery with a needle-tipped probe. A thin flake of thesample should be detachable from the section.

(4) Renove any adhering Crystalbond by agitatino :he flake -nethanol in an ultrasonic cleaner.

'&a. Issued I Ot . 0 Raeviewed . ev ,a j I No.EateUY

lilc ic982 AUG 191082 SIENNIALI Y . -.

Ao0004-58.1 (s-5.791

RHO-SWt-MA4


(5) Attach the sample flake to a TEM slotted grid, using a cementsuch as Eastman 910. Avoid letting cement flow into the gridslot.

(6) Thin the specimen for TEMIS7EM examination using the Gatan Dualton Mill. Operating instructions are contained in Chapters 3-4(pp. 8-1S) of the Ion Mill Instruction Manual. Operatingexperience indicates that a tilt of 10-PO, gun current of0.5 mAmp and a gun voltage of S kV are optimum for basaltsamples. Milling time for a 30 wn thick basalt sample is4-8 hours.

NOTE: The ion-mill emoloys two lasers in the autotermina-tian system. Observe all safety precautions forlaser use i n the aperating manual. In particular,do not look at the direct or reflected laser beamor eye damace couid result.

(7) Apply a conductive coating of carbon or gold-palladium to thesamole. Procedures for use of the Denton OV-502 carbon coaterare found an pages S-9 of the Oenton Operating Instructions. Acarbon rod with a 1 ca thinned tip produces an optimum coating.A aold-oalladium coating can be applied using the TechnicsHummer V coater, according to the procedures in the TechnicsOoerating Manual. Coating should be done in the 'Auto-Pulse"mode for I 112 - 2 minutes.

0OTE: The carocn coater emoloys an extremely bright caroonarc. Avoid lookino directiv at 'his arc or evedamace couid resuit.

(3) Store the grids in individual plastic petri dishes marked withsamole identification codes. Samole identification and controlis accomplished accordina to 30P C-4.3.2.

5. o.. 3 -reparation of Powdered Material for TElMSTEM

2N A'05 -

( _ !xaminne the samole.under an ootical imicroscooe ano selec:aooroximately 1 mW of representative -material.

(2) Suspend the material in approximately 1 c=3 of ethanol . Thismay be done by ultrasonic agitation or, if required, followinqcrushino in a boron carbide mortar and oestle.MsA Xci ,°,,e.¢va -4:p ;a rro n'<A qr,,4r /:caru G Can

,(2) _ :ji_ fln ra:r coc.1:: w;}h 9lP r~ A~ ^Transfer several drous of the ethanol sus-pension to the grid using a microoipette, or dio the orid intothe suspension. Allow the arid to drv in a horizontal oosition.

J11

One. issuea sao.t."s IwSu j To a. Reviewea Sv - q I Joatea, - I r4

DEC 1982 A MUG l982 j IIE'INIALL Y I O f .4. 2 k C ' I

A-6OO-056. 'R.5.79)

RHO-BWI-MA-4


(4) Coat the grid with carbon or gold-palladium in accordance withSection 6.1.2.7 and store in accordance with Section 6.1.2.8.

6.1.4 Bulk Samoles for SEM

(1) Using a razor blade, cut a <1 mn thick planchette from a puregrapcite block, clean the planchette with ethanol, and attach itto a copper SEM mount using carbon. paint.

(2) Apply a thin layer of carbon paint to the exposed plancnettesurface and transfer the sample to the tacky carbon paint.

(3) Coat the sample in accordance with Section 6.1.2(7) and store inaccordance with Section 5.1.2(9).

6.1.5 Soecimen Loadina

(1) TEM Grid. Place the arid, coated side up, on the lower sectionor a uJEML EM-SR graphite saecimen retainer. Carefully positionthe too section of the holder and encage the spring clips.Place the retainer into the IE0L EM-SCSH conmon specimen holderand gently rel'ease the catch. Load the holder into the 200 CXin accordance with Paragraph 1.5 (po. 4-5) of Aopendix SCSH ofthe JEOL 200 CX InstructIon Manual.

(2) SEM Mount. Place the mount directly into the Large Soecimen|Hoider and proceed in accordance with oaracrauh 6.1.5t1) above.

5.2 200 CX STARTUP AVo ALAGNMENT

Startup and three methods of alignnents are detailed- in Chaoter 5to7. d) of the JEOL 200 CX Instruction Manual. Carry out a full columnalianmrent orocedure according to Method ^ (pD. S-52 to 5-57) at the startof each day's analysis. At the sane time, allon the instrument for SEMooeration in accordance with Chapter 5 (po. 2-28) of "he JEOL EMASIO'0 Jltrahiclh Qesolution Scanning System 1nstruc:-on 4anual. Realignmentdurinc the course of the day is onmy -ejuired if -he accelerating voltaceis changed.

iO at.isoz I Suotuas Isw o e .Reviewso Sv N3q j No.

D '-EC 1983 A I'- IIE 98 AUG 1i982 31ENNIALL Y j 5 'o , a , -i.. . . Z. _

A-4oo0 -SSt.1 !R.5. 91

RHO.8W1-MA-4

BASALT OPSRATING PROCEDURE

6.3 TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM)

6.3.1 tilumination

The 2oo CX in the TEM mode illuminates the sample with a diffuse beamof electrons accelerated by a voltage of 40-200 kV. The transmittedelectron image may be vieved on a fluorescent screen or photographed usingsheet film. Available magnifications range from 1OOX to 450,OOOX, with amaximum resolution of 3.5 A.

6.3.2 Focusing and PhotograDhina

Image observation and precision focusing in the TEM mode aredescribed on pages 5-22 to 5-26 of the 200 CX Instruction Manual.Procedures for photograohy are detailed on paces 5-26 to 5-31 of the samemanual. It should be noted that TEM photographs require darkroomprocessing.

o.4 SCANNING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (STEM)

5.4.1 Forming the Imace

!he 200 CX in the STEM mode uses a finely-focused beam to scan anarea of the sample in a raster pattern. 7he transmitted electron signalfrom each point in the raster is used to oroduce an image on a CRT. 7heSEM imace can be photographed using either Polariod film or sheet film.Available magnification ranges from 30OX to OO,OOOX, with a maximumresolution of Q0 A. The STEM is comolementary to TEM, in that STE4orovides transmitted images with high resolution, a hich degree of controlover contrast and brichtness, and the convenience of "instant" photooraohy.

5.4.2 Controllina the Panel

The 3TEM mode is controlled from the EMYSID 20 oanei. Ooeration OTthis panei is aescribed in Chapters :-e5 (oo. 4-'O) of -he 24-AS.3 30Lnstruction Manual. Oetailed instructions for STEM observation are f^ounain Section 5.3 (pp. 33-34) of this manual.

Oats 1SU00 I suomats Is-a 1 .veV a ;,aq i No.oated i

DEC 1983 AUG 1982 SIE'YNIALLY ' cof I -r,. 1 :I !

A-6O00.SB0.* A.5-79)

RHO-8WI1MA4'


6.5 SCAINING ElECTRON MICROSCOPY (SEM)

6.5.1 SE1 Photoraohy

The SEM mode uses a finely-focused electron beam to scan the samplesurface in a raster pattern. Secondary electrons produced at each pointin the scan are used to produce an image on a CRT. The SEM image can bephotographed using either Polariod film or sheet film. Available magni-fication ranges from IOX to 800,OOOX, with a maximum resolution of 40A.The SEM photographs show only the surface of a sample, since secondaryelectrons reach the detector from only the top few angstrams of thematerial.

6.5.2 Controllina the Panel

The SEO Mode is controlled from the EN-ASID 30 panel. Operation ofthis panel is described in Chapters 5-d (pp. 24-40) of the EM-ASID 30Instruction Manual. Detailed instructions for SEM Observations are foundin Section 5.2 (pa. 31-33) of that manual.

6 .5 SEE CTED 0ARE ELECTRON DIFFRACrION (SED)

6.6.1 Oiffractoarams

In the SAED mode, the diffuse electron beam is diffracted by thecrystal Dlanes within the specimen. The resulting pattern of dots orrinas, known as a "diffractooram," can be observed on the fluorescentscreen or ohotographed with sheet film. The spacing of the tots or rinascan be translated into '1 d-saacing," the measure Of interplanar distanceswithin crystals. The d-spacings are equivalent to those measured byconventional X-ray diffraction (XRO), though the relative intensity datain XRO oatterns are not available from SAED. However, since thescattering power of an electron beam is more than 10 times as areat asthat of an X-ray bean, much smaller samoles (<. am) can be studied qithSAED than 4ith XRD.

6.5.2 Photocraohine Oif ,fractoarams

The procedure for producing an SAED diffractogram is detailed inSection 5.7.1 (pp. 5-69 to 5-71) of the 200 CX Instructon Manual. Notethat the film presently in use (Koaak 1489 Electron Microscope Film)allows the recording of SAED images in 2 to 8 seconds, rather than the 32to 90 seconds called for in the manual.

Oatn tiuu i Summaons i*Ja I - oe Rviewov ev I aq i No.

DEC a982 A'3AUG 1982 I 3I ENNIALLf 3 , I4 z C-.I1

A-6000058.1 'R.5.,9)

RHO- WI-MA-4


6.6.3 Contact Prints

After-processing in the darkroom, SAED diffractogranm are reproduceda contact prints for measurement. Distances from the centril spot todiffraction rings or soots are measured and related to crystal d-spacingsby the following equation.

d ,L_r()

4vere

d . crystal d-spacing (A)

L = camera length (cn)

x - electron beam wavelength (A)

r , measured distance to ring or spot fcn)

The elec ron beam wavelength, x in A, is a function of acceleratinopotential, V in volts:

12.26

(I! ( 0. 978 x *10 - ) ±12 (2)

7he camera length (L) is selectable on the 200 C(.

5.5.4 Camera Calibration

The product L, known as the "camera constant' varies denendinc on thesettIno of the 'camera lencth" dial and on fluctuations in lens currents.Ac-urate determinations of d-saacings requires that the cafmera constant becalibrated tinder normal operating conditions. A calibration s-ranaard,consistina of a rFM -iesh arid coated with a thin 'ayer of :!old, s-enoloyed and the camera constant is derived from imeasurements 3f zhe -naspacings on the gold diffractogram. Calibration photos and results aresaved in the "STE4 Standardization" notebook. ODerational exoerienceindicates that recalibration should be oerformed every 2-3 months, andafter each filament replacement.

Oatm Isnua suo*arums isae Ta St 8tvirwed B 5 qe , No.

EC ;983 i A'MUG :982 aIEiINIALLY a a

A.60004-OB.' A5 -91

IRH"SW1.MA-4


5.6.5 Electron 0iffractoaram Measurements

The d-spacings derived from electron diffractograms are compared tolists tabulated in the Powder Oiffraction File Data Books ("Mineralsa and"tncrganic Phases). Operational experience indicates that d-spacingmeasurements from the 200 CX are accurate to < + 21%

5.7 ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTOSCOPY (EDS)

6.7.1 Histocrams

In the EDS mode, characteristic X-rays produced by interaction of theelectron beam with the samole generate signals that are processed anddisplayed as histograms of X-ray counts versus energy. These histograms,known as EDS spectra, can be plotted, photographed on the display screen,or recorded an comouter discs. Interactive comouter software allawselement identification and spectrum manipulation. The PrincetonGamma-Tech (PMT) 30O0 EDS system on the 200 CX allows qualitativedetermination of the major element constituents of samples as small as700 A. The system is sensitive to all elements from ,Ya to Cf in ttlePeriodic table, with detection limits in optimal cases of approximately0.1 wt .

5.7.2 EDS Calibration

DetaiTed orocadures for calibrating the EMS system, as well asfor obtaining, analyzing, and recording specta, are contained in atwo-volurre set of PGT Instruction Manuals. The nanuals r-eflect the mos trecent version of the computer operatina system software, presently7ersion 4.20. This software, contained on pre-recoraed c"rmouter discs, isproorietary in nature. Calibration speczra are saved on Computer datadiscs, under the spectrum title "Calib."

;.;.3 LDS Analvsis

Ooerational exoerience with the 200 CX microscope and 3000 system 35S;ndicate several considerations relevant to LDS analysis. Samoles aremost commonly analyzed with the microscope in the SEM mode, with thescanned area or point defining the area analyzed. X-rays reach thedetector from a iolume of several cubic microns below the sample surface,so the effective spatial resolution of the EDS analysis is always muc-poorer than that of the SEM image.

The microscooe and detector aeometry dictate that flat-lving,initially horizontal, samples must be tilted approximately. 0 counter-clockwise in order for X-rays to reach the detector in sufficient iumoers.

Oat. 4sa s j Suo0aoes Im*. To 8. Anvwa ev I PNa ! o.1

DEC 1983 AUG i982 | 3IENN4IIALLY I - t j C-4. I .

A-6000o058.1 A.5.-91

RHO-SWIMA-4


An accelerating voltage of 200 kV is used routinely for thin samples onTEM grids. A voltage of 40 kV provides EDS spectra with less interferencesfor bulk samples on SEM mounts.

7.0 CUALITY ASSURANCE

7.1 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION AND ,4AINTENANCE

Quality Assurance for -this SOP is implemented in accordance withSOP C-1.3 for the calibration of applicable support, test, and repairinstruments, as well as through the Maintenance rnstrument Calibration-System (MICS). Calibration of the 200 CX'camera constant and the EDSsystem are described in this procedure in Sections 5.6.4 and 6.7.2,respectively. Routine maintenance of the 200 Ca is conducted inaccordance with Chapter 6 (pp. 6-1 to 6-42) of the 200 CX InstructioniManual. Periodic and emergency servicing of the 20O CX and EDS areProvided by the manufacturers under the terms of service contracts.

7.2 W0CUMENT CONTROL

|ata collected with these instruments are recorded in controlledlaboratory notebooks in accordance with SOPs E-9 and C-1.3.2. Copies ofall ohotos and contact orints of all SAED diffractoorams are maintained inthe noteoooks, 4tile negatives are filed separately. Plotter copies of-D-S suecta are maintained in notebooks and duolicate cooies of all spectraand ooeratino software are preserved on comouter discs. Peer review ofioteoooks and reports is in accordance with 30P A-22.

7.3 SAMPt.E AND MESUR2EMENT TRAC-T8ILITY

Samole traceability is as specified in SOP C-'.3. Measurementtechnioues and data locations are recorded on a traveler card mnicdaccormanies each samiole. When analysis is conmolete one c=3y -r this cardis 'iled in the "Solids Characterization Nlumoer Loa"' nateDoCK, one cooy is4orwaraed to the investigator -he requested the analysis, and one cooy isforwarded to the Materials Testting roup arcnives.

I Oat. Isuod suoeal ass1ue I 7o e evowma div j PWO j No.C I I !

3 EC '181 i AUG 1-982 B IENN IALLY 7~ i ~I i98f3l i .IA46000-058.* R5-.9

RHO.8WIMAA4


s.a APPLICABLE DOCUMETS

RHO4MA-221, Volumes 1 and 2, 'Accident Prevention Standards"Industrial Hygiene and Safety

RHO-8IMA-4, Basalt Operating Procedures (BOPs)A-22, 'Peer ReviaNC-!.3, "Instrurment Cal ibration"C-4.2, "MTG Safety Requirements"C-4.3, "Test Specimen (Sample) Control System for the BMRL"C-4.3.2, 10ata and Samp7e Control for Basalt Solids Characterization"

C IV 0GC 4.2%,, "P' paretiem of CGarbor Filn far TEt Grids"C-4.21, "Sawple Preparation for Metallograohic and Petrographic

ExaminationOE-9, "Engineering Notebooks and Laboratory Data Management"

ANSI/ASME NOA-1, QualitSy Assurance ProgranRequira-ents for Nuclear Facilities

Oenton vacuum, nc. Operating InstructionsOV-502, "Hiah Vacuum Evanorator with Autocycle and 5 /4 .n. ?uma"

Gatan, Inc. Instruction Manual"Dual Ion Mill 600 Series'

JEOL, Ltd, Instruction ManualsJEM 200 CX, "Electron Microscope"E-4S1D 3D, "Ultrabigh Resolution Scanning System"

.ower Diffraction File Oata 3ooks"Minerals""Inarganic Phases "

?,-nceton Gammna-7ech tnstruction Manuals! "System rnstructionst"

"Awoeidices"

Sybron/Barnstead Instructlon Manuals"RfOoure Systenr'!"NANOpure-A Systems"

lechnics, Inc. Instruction Manual"wyMuner VI$

Zate isnua suosnaaes In" o i. Revtewee 3v ' °qe No.

DEC 1983 AUG I982 3IElNNIALLY 1 Of-. ,3A-000-5B. 1 iR.5.791

RHOQWi-MA4

SASALT OPERATING PROCEDURE'I

9.0 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVALS

Prepared by o - 0_

C. C. Allen, Senior ScientistMaterials Testing Group

oate

Reviewed by�11V/ or4 1///27 / i

O-ateJ, V. ,Mohatt, Program Representative>7ealth, Safety, and Environment

L-ZZ11X--'KApproved byR. C. Edwards, ManagerMaterials resting GroupEngineered Barriers Oepartnent

3ate I

Dare ' /M. I. Smithi, ManagerEngineered Barriers OecartmentBasalt Waste Isolation Project N

CA C ancurr fflceM. ,n aerQuality 'ssuranceBasalt Waste tsolation Proiect

IJ'l/ /'

Date iswed Suoefseoes issue 7a Pe Revewved 8v Pagaqe | o.

3EC 1983 I ' S G 1982 3IEINIALLY | i Of < C

A46000-B8.A f R5..91

RHO-SWIMA-4


¶.?.LL M�

(CITCSWAM

ML=N

I. I, x.I

STY? 'UrTU -"IAN7RS~McmUIR

,we-~k I e- *e

F:IGURE 1. 200 CX Layout and Emergency equiment.

nam Issuded suoenhs issue I Tho as Reewee Ev | ya No.

! JEC 1983 Ij AUG 1982 } BISMIALLY i * 1I .

A.oaOOOaa.O. *.59\

RHO43WIMA-4

BASALT OPERATING PROCEDURERESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION: Site AUTHOR: S. R. Strait

A00roved Bv yGI CQawtacaini GEOPHYSICAL WELL LOGGING SCIENTIFICM-~3 tots .- /9' ' I I TECHNOLOGIES

1.0 OBJECTIVE

The objective of this procedure is to provide guidelines for geophys-ical well logging conducted for the Basalt Waste Isolation Project (BWIP)of Rockwell Hanford Operations (Rockwell).

2.0 APPLICABILITY

The procedure is primarily applicable to geophysical logging activ-ities conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for Rockwell. Theprocedures are also applicable to commercial logging companies when spe-cified in subcontract purchase/agreements.

3.0 DEFINITIONS

3.1 GEOPHYSICAL WELL LOGGING

Geophysical well logging consists of lowering probes (fluid temper-ature, spontaneous potential/resistivity, caliper, flowmeter, naturalgamma, gamma-gamma, neutron-epithermal neutron, and sonic) down a welland recording at the ground surface a continuous instrumental response toa specific'physical property of the rock material or fluid being logged.

Geophysical well logging can assist in interpreting the lithology,geometry, resistivity, bulk density, porosity, relative permeability, andmoisture content of rock-mass in addition to defining the source and move-ment of water within the borehole.

3.2 DATUM

Datum refers to any point identified as the basis for calculating ormeasuring, such as a predetermined location point from which measurementsare made.

Date Issuea Suoers Issue To Be Revievead 8 iaqe NO.Oa 1|d

TO/22/84 JUL 1982 ANNUALLY 1 Of C-2. lO

A4000.O58 (R-6.79)

RHO-SWI-MA-4


(2) Gearhart-Owen Widco logger. Includes electronics, chart re-corder, winch, and 10,000 ft of four conductor cable; adapta-tion for using a winch with 10,000 ft of seven conductor cableis also available.

(3) Well head sheave.

(4) IAC power sources.

(5) Radioactive sources (americium-beryllium and cesium 137).

6.2 EQUIPMENT SETUP

(1) In preparation for PNL geophysical logging, back the loggingtruck to approximately 75 ft from the well.

(2) Turn an the electronics, which run power produced from agenerator in the logging truck.

(3) Turn on the chart recorder and check to ensure that the pens areclean and able to write.

(4) At the well head, place a sheave over the center of the casingin the well.

(5) Extend the cable, with an attached probe, from the winch to thesheave at the well such that the probe's zero point is at groundsurface or a datum predetermined by the Rockwell representative.If the zero point cannot be placed at the datum, the distancefrom the zero point to the datum must be accounted for so alldepth measurements are relative to the datum.

(6) Set the depth indicator on the equipment panel to zero relativeto the probe's zero point. The equipment is now ready to runany desired probe.

6.3 EQUIPMENT OPERATION

Each of PNL's geophysical logging probes is run in accordance withdetailed instructions set forth in the manuals listed below:

(1) Caliper, fluid temperature, flowmeter, natural gamma, neutron-epithermal neutron, and gamma-gamma probes

by: Instruction Manual - Pulse Logging Systems, Gearhart-Owenindustries, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas.

NiOats I sueduer e z taus To fie R vt v | Ps" No.

10/22J84 UL 1982 ANNUALLY I 3o 3 C-2.iO

A 0ooO0O08.1 (R.5-791

RHO-8WI-MA-4

BASALT`OPERATING PROCEDURE

(2) Spontaneous potential resistivity probe

by: Instruction Manual - ELM 202 Electric Log Module,Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas.

(3) Sonic probe

by: Peretro, et al, rech. Bull. with Operational ProceduresNumber 2 for Cement Bond Logs, Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc.,Fort Worth, Texas.

6.4 LOGGING COMPLETION

(1) When logging is completed, place the probes in the logging truckto avoid damage during transport.

(2) Store the radioactive sources in a lead-filled holder for agamma source, and a paraffin wax-filled holder for the neutronsource.

| (3) Gather other equipment.

7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE

7.1 ROCKWELL MONITORING

Mo ensure that quality assurance procedures are followed, a Rockwellrepresentative must be present while the ?NL logging crew is performinggeopnysical logging for Rockwell. Any deviation from the standard operat-ing procedures is to be approved by the Rockwell reoresentative by signingacross each log. Each log must also be signed by the logging engineerthat gathered the geophysical well log data.

7.2 LOG NOTATIONS

All pertinent information regarding well identification, depth, typeof log, casing, and the dial settings on the logging panel is to be notedon the top of each log. If pertinent to the operation or analysis of thelog, remarks are to be made as to the general condition of the well, anyextraneous conditions (power lines, etc.) that might affect equipmentresponse, and problems encountered during logging.

Oats IssuOe Suoermas Issu*e To Be RYeviwoa 8v i w NO.

10/22/84 JUL 1982 ANNUALLY | 4 Of 8 C-2. OA-6000.058.1 (R-5-79)

RHO-8WI4MA-4


7.3 EQUIPMENT STANDARDIZATION

To standardize log responses, all geophysical logs run on the HanfordSite must also be run in reference to Well 399-5-2 (Figure 1). For PNL,geophysical logs must be run -every three months to check for instrumentdrift. If tool malfunctions occur while logging, the tool is to be run inthe reference well after being repaired to assure proper responses.

7.4 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION

Calibrate all probes (e.g., counts/sec for the neutron log) in ac-cordance with procedures set forth in the respective instruction manua.l(see Section 8.0). Calibrate each log before and after the log is pro-duced. In the case of the sonic and spontaneous potential/resistivitylogs where an after-calibration check is not available, perform a 50-ftoverlap from a previous logging run is performed, if posssible, to checkfor consistency in the calibration. The before-and-after calibrationsserve as double checks and account for any drift of tool responses dueto borehole conditions. Perform a 50-ft repeat section or 50-ft overlapfrom a previous logging run for each log to ensure repeatability in thetool response.

7.5 GEOPHYSICAL LOG STORAGE

Geophysical logs are distributed to:

(1) The geophysical log files of the Drilling and Testing Group(BWIP)

(2) The Geosciences Group (8WIP)

(3) Basalt Records Manaqement Center

(4) The Rockwell representative in cnarge of logging.

Original geophysical logs are kept on file at the subcontractor'sfacilities. Copies are available on request from the Rockwell represen-tative in charge of logging. Copies are distributed in accordance withBOP E-6.

Oat* I uuoaed Suerwts 1swe* To. aReviewed 8v Pe"g No.

10/22/84 JUL 1982 ANNUALLY 5 Of 3 C-2.10

A46000.058.1 (R.6.79)

RHO-BrWI-M A-4


8.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

RHO-1MA-100. Policies ManualPolicy 8-04, *Control of Employee and Environmental Exposures"

RHO-.MA-278, The ALARA Program

RHO-BWI-MA-4, Basalt Operating Procedure (SOP) ManaulSOP C-1.2, "Field Work"SOP C-2.8, "General Hydrologic Field Testing Rrocedures," Appendix F.,

"Instanteous Pulse Withdrawal/Injection Test"

Instruction Manual, Pulse Locdinq System, Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc.,Fort Worth, Texas

Instruction Manual, ELM 202 Electric LoQ Module, Gearhart-Owen industries,Inc., Fort Worth, Texas

Peveto, F. H., et al, Tech. Bull: with Ooerational Procedures Number 2 forCement Bond Loas, Gearnart-Owen Inaustries, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas

R. F. Ballard, Jr. and F. G, McLean, In Situ Measurement of SoilProoerties/Schlumberger Ltd., Loa Interpretations, Vol. 1 API,American Petroleum Institute, RP-33-74/J. 0. Haun & L./W. Leroy -

Subsurface Geology in Petroleum Exploration/R. L. Geyer &J. L. Myung, Proceeaines of the 12th Symoosium on Rock Mechanics,Rolla, Mississippi

9.O SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVAL

QA Concurrence ( )o Maae /,M. F. 11tol, Manager udaeIQuality AssuranceBasalt Waste Isolation Program

ocae ssued SuDerseAdes Iue v F'a Page No.

10/22/84 DateJUL 1982 | ANNUALLY 5 O -2. 10-f Ct

A 6000058.1 (S-6-791

RHO-8WI-MA4


FIGURE 1. Location of GeophysicalLogginq Standard Well 399-5-2(arrow}.

Oa. Iued Suomaes Isuo To Be Revieawa Bv Ppe I No.O|ted I 7

10/22/84 JUL 1982 1 ANNUALLY 7 of IC-7.IO-IA-6000.a5a.1 (R-5.79)

RHO-SWI-MA-4


TABLE 1. Basic Geophysical Functions and Selected Uses.

Geophysical Function Basic Use Remarks

Spontaneous potential Identification of interbedcharacteristics

Zone thicknesses and depths

Resistivity Stratigraphic correlationsZone thicknesses and depthsMud infiltrate zones

Fluid temperature Locate sources of groundwater contribution intoborehole

Identify direction of ground-water circulation in bore-hole

Pressure corrections for headmeasurements

Geothermal gradient

Flowmeter Fluid flow velocity in bore-hole

Location of fluid gain andloss zones

Caliper Locating borehole breakoutsand chances in boreholediameter|

Identifying liner sectionsLocating large rock frac-tures

Natural gamma Indicators of lithology Nurnsource (Am-Be)} Stragraphic correlations

Neutron-epithermal Moisture Contentneutron Bulk Porosity

Stratigraphic correlations

Gamma-gamma Bulk density Gamma Source (Cs-137)

Sonic Cement bonding betweenrock and casing

Bulk porosityFracture detection

Date Is ued SummrioM 1MA To 8. Revtwea eV Pup No.

10/22/84 JUL 1982 ANNUALLY 8 O f C-2.I1

A4600.058.1 (A-5-791

F~f )ECT InISLct4

HWOIP TECHNOUCAL AOPPROACH

Dw__1ined Geologic Disposal

SYSlEII 1ISSION I

iDefiniticxn of Project maknageiwnt appro8c1hLicensing prograit QA program etc

Project tugem P1*7Zkti Aiwed.* Aev~si.* 6A4~K...1fivo4VDC1JtV>7t - VG'r~eJ3t>A LDADVI

Identify *- 0b CorrelateAll Information & Data . Information & Data Needs with

Needs Regulatory Criteria & Issues

D: w . : Wrk flow f ur . . .... IV S* .:Dtruewihporameters :::,::................ : ::'........ ....... _.. ... ;.. ....... ... ..,, .:. dominate isol p, s Define test facility

:constructibility. ' de1' i ... d5e ios. ' : .rest d fatsu .

.. ide I Prioritize Data Needs '.Design test eqiprnent Design test facility.:: . instrunentation and/or nodifications

Deter mine the level of certainty: . . est Focility:: towich each douinant parameter : :esiwA scr40tAAS £ O,.wiSw

: , iust be understood ... . . ',b.4)

:'.,.Define the tee e c.,:ete installation check-out, calibratio4to c ara ter ze ach dom nan pa ene er.test sequence & facility maintenance planninq:to characterize each dowinant parameter; ........ .. .. ..... ........... ..... ..,, ........ ... .... ......... .. ...

data i Prepare techntcal proeedures::: : .: eg, in-situ test. field survey, study, etc :for test ,nduet .

tt)teaug weuteq aaaSlJ_ cm ze I:spatially and chronologicalvy. to,attain needed levels of confidence.

:(3)define data acquisition requirements, expected :.results, test equipiient. instrientation't'accaptibility criteria. continS~ency plans. etc.:

(4)de*fire date analysis mthod(s) .(5)define methods to interpret results.:::: :::(6)define methods to develop and verify.' needed wdels and codes.

: .. .. . . . . ,: .. .. . . :.:

, JC*xplete technical planninq; eg:task sequyence network, detine inPut/o tPit interfaces.

ipentify interim & final conclusion docurnentation. .:' ': .:.: '.:. .: ' .' . . 1; . . . ... 8. . .. .; .i. :. . ': :..' 1 :

.... .... l al LC .aW .. .

[FIFaiii-iDUMP TECHUOCAL APPROACH

.5lyStan &VznfeeiJA /&AV&&YaLi?C P1w)

11ined Geologic DisposalSYSiTh IISSIDN

.Definition of Project management approach.Licensing progrant QA progran etce

r~rc - rr q ,nna~~ n rca

IU ca t & elC orrwatiV &

Identify CorrelateAll Information & Data Information & Data Needs with

Needs IRegulatory Criteria & Issues~~~.. .,.Need .......or .rtra ., I.,s, s ..... .................. . ...... .. ........ .. ... ... ......... ....... .. .....I.......

Wor-k F low - orn Tests~*hich par.etrs.:..

do ftnat xs ola ti io p e r fo'm rmance' ... . .. .:. O.,b t st fa il tc o s r c i i fl ty , a. d e i ec s o s J df ic ati on s:.-* r s r ~ t c::.contrutib . ;..'F . .... ... .

*,Consolidate a Prioritize Data eeds: . :Desiqn test euipmant-:-:DesiQn test facilit^. .. . .. . . . . . . . .

Determine the level of curtaiJ' res. Facility

ASJSt be understood:' pr4urat.~ - . . -... . . .. .... . . . C o r l t e i n t X a t o i c . e c .o . c l r a o i, ... -^.--^..

to c h aithdtehnc nt artetet..sequenoce &facility maintenance plannto c h a r ac t e r iz e e a c h do in atepaarn de t r '. ... .*o m e t h-- - - - - . ... ..... ..t. .. ........

. . . . . . . 7. . . . . . . . ...................... ..... . . .. .. ...(iseiect' data soitrce' and' acquisition 1withod,eg, in-situ test, field survey, study, etc

(2)detertnine required data s&le sizef: spatially and chrondogically, toattain needed levels of confidence.

(3)define data acquisition requlrowents, expected

results, test equipI- 9t. nst.L.ne.I.atln, ',acceptibility criteriacontinBeuncy' plans.etc.

(4)define data analysis ntho(s).* (S)define methods to interpret results.(6)define methods to develop and verify

needed models and codes.:~~~ :::::,:::::::::::..:: .:::::: :.:

:Complete technical planning; eq:.* .. .. .. ... .. I . . ..

aosk sequence network, define input/output interf aces. I

Iidentify interim & final concpusion docuentation.::..:....:: ..: .'...:: .. ;:. .... ;. ,;. .:;.;;..;.;; .. ;..:.; .. :

............ L E J

Prepare technlcal procedures, :,, 'for test conduct ' ,,;,,

...... ..... , ,.. .. ................................ ..........Conduct test & t AC4EdSitk~l.

Compile raw & reduced data h'ecrd Repti

BWOP TECHNOCAL APPROACHS)'staw nsineerirQ AWirCent PJw'i

BWIP .Definition of Project management approacft1ined Geologic Disposal Licensing program QA program etc

SS1TCN " 1 1 . ................................ ............. . .... ....... ...... ............. .....Project t*UmWt pJa'

itta-td. A*. &Wsis.. .2(. .Rr,4.l-£avicrent £imrr Litia

Identify 4 CorrelateAll Information a Data I Information & Data Needs with

Needs j euaorCrtia8Tsues

* t- tr . i . ssW rk flow 1nr Tests~ Wt uset fac111r LMratinV PJO-Js

* dpnmnte isolatiorl perfor anqne .""' ' 3$ t^' f oific fs.construct. bility; *& .. sil ......... :....... ... ific.t t rest P

*'Consolidate & Prioritize Data Ned.. :: :: ,^ eintste-imn Desiwi test faoiliity~x:^ -. -:--.: : :istruw ntWtim::F ondior 1 ticins.--.-2-

: . .... . .. " . -. . - .. " est F o it

-:Determine the level of certainty .:..,__._.,,'_-___:-eto w hich e ach dosinant parwter ':-:... , s

.st be understood:- . . .

:::in th technic::::',al. ef,,.ort npete jnstalladckt check-ouit calibrcation. - ':om.::a:te: inathe echnicefforant ...... t test sequence & facility maintenance plannim:-:--

(s tdata source rd acquisition ethod:: .. ::,dPrepare techncal on:'eg. in-situ test. field survey. std.etc...: . : ,. .. :::..-frts proncedu'es

.tudy.design for testnconduc

(2)determ.ne requ.ired data saa4a cIze. : ' '* ' patially and chronpogoocelWy. to ::. . . :,,}Conduict test a OtACtiIsitio:fi::ttj £n reeded levels of confidence. :: :: . Caqpile rau £ reduced data R9eco~rdott(3)efine data acquisition requirenents. expetd k Flw . . ......................... :i:results. tst dlpnent. instrtjnentatlort :' i- o llyem & Studies'.acceptlbility: criter'ia contin ency plains, etc. ? ', "' .' "Pre tcz rcr.e fr ;

(4)define data analysis methoa(s :. :calculatiens analyses. tdeXel fornulatiot.etc.(S)define methods to interpret results...... .: .. 4...........(6)define nmethods to develop and verify:, . ,

. .needed mnodels and codes.:: .:. ::- :::

: q -::: each :'::: -::::: i,:: :'::::::::':er,

:oCp ealete tecnnical: plarmino eQ-.::::-ask sequence network. def ine inputoutput interfaces.;

identio y c iteriz 6 final conclupsironr doc9...r.tatio.. 35

. :. :. : :. :.: : :;. ; . ; : ; ;;.;. ; .;: .:;:.: .::

. . . . . . ae r .. ...... ........ i ....... t ... . .. ..

PfiirCTnmLct~]

BWDUP' TECHINDCAL APPROACHSy~,stav &Wineer-ir /"kAW%~t PJ&9?

8WIPMined Geologic Disposal

SYSlEI1 hISSir)N

£ ;i b c . A k e s A & 4 v zs ~ i s I 6 4 f ? .r k .XP .lt.tSu7C~~t * .. Crrc

Identify +- CorrelateAll Inforxiation & Data i Information 1 Data Needs with

Needs Regtulatory Cliteria & Issues. - t : ................. .... . : . .... ..... ...... . .......- I

Work -. : . Determiine which paraqiqters I

: dominate isolation performance, : :.s:construtibility. & design decisions

Consolidate e Prioritize Data Needs

Determine the level of certinty :to which each dominant parcmeter., 1 st be understood a

.. .:. .t:. . :... ctla-7 ,::Define the technical effort::

:to characterize each drxnioant paraimeter:~~~iI . . . . . . , : :: : c.-........ . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .................:,. ...(i)seiect data sour ce and acquisition tho:t

eg, in-situ test field survey, study. etc.:(2)deternine required data sanple size,

:: ~poinbya~nd chro olo icawl. y to :.::attain needed levels of confidence. ',:.:+

:(3)define data acquisition requiremients, expected: . Work FMMv:.results, test' eq'uipnpent, instrLient'itiort ',f a!Ys-

.ibillty criteriai oontinency' plansetc.* ([)derlfn. d~at~a a~nalysis inrettoaes). ' :':'::::::-: :.:: .:-:W()def*in- methods to interpret results.(6)defiine methods to develop and verify:

needed madels and codes.::,:::;::::. . . . . . . . . . ....::::.:::................ ,:

, Conplete technical planning; eg:ask seceIence netwurk, defiie input/output inierfaces.identify interim & finial conclusion doctarientation. :5

.TS ifidaL L IWork Flw - ,.

IDefinition of Project management approachLicensing program QA prograi etc

Project / t7.gaiV~t PIN. 4... f q

iLV-1t4,7 Vo "07

Flow-for-Testsi Test icit, 4wrtP~' tla7S

.-D~efine test facility--.-,.-,-.. .:odifications ,-.-:- -,., Test P.,4 ,

. Desir test qipiient . - beslen. test

...;. ..... i.. rest Faculity..... -:--:Osign eScriptiocs a rxn~

.. . . . ,, ^ ^ ................ .... . . . , , _.

Coinplete installation check-out calibrtio :,.test sequence & facility maintenance planning

, Prep~are techrnical procedfuresfor test conduct

.......... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......... ..............,l ............. ...

Conduct test & .64.titnCouipile raw 8 reduced data RecordReort.

es Al Studies ..... .....Prepare technical procebdures for ,

,,c~alcula~tios analyses. mdel formula5tioetni .$:.::.......... ....

Asserble study and analysis Ddtd EvalUatiOif~ndi Report.findings 40-. .... ............... ... .......... , ......,_. ..... ... ...!

.iXt toperforin v assoss 4tS

site feasibility criusiwisJ auto pockts far o*sfvn

F JECTI1 B~WOP TIECHNOCAL APPROACHSystan ElVioor.Mg /Aazent P.Ln

lo, ......... ..

ZDefinition of Project management approach,*. Licensi prograi% C prograu eto

6WlP1ined Geologic Disposal

SYSTEh "ISSItI I

'9' M1 42^t,,s4 |PRoject /"wwwwevt PJan

,�qv ex4ferij J Issivs.. .....

Identify 4-ti" CorrelateAll Information & Data Information & Data Needs with

Needs WS I Regulatory Criteria & Issues. .... ..... ... ......... .-. . . . ............. .. .......... . ........ ..... . ...

: :::~::t: :. :.................. aJ::sxkWorik-Flow-

::Determine wmhich paraeters : :: . Wnse .. owdaoirnalte isolation performance.

:constructibiiity & design decisions: : PR---

.::Consolidate & Prioritize Data Needs :Design

::Determine the level of certainty':to which each dionnant earaieter:

:::::utb desod:VS- ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .!potift:::::::::::::ust be understood : U

:Defie the technical effort ' . :, . l.eto characterize eacth dominotrit ,parakmeter: .

(1)select data source and acquisition awthoc" : . ..: eg, in-situ test, field survey, study. etc.(2)detertine required data sanple size. .: :

. spatialtly and chronological0Y1 1 WS: i .

':attair needd ievels' of conffidence. .::. :

* atin a ion reguiremnets, expected. -:: Work Flow l: results. test equidpmez-t instrt'srie'nt'atio'r't.: ' 1r Anialysies S till*acceptibility criteri& contingency plans. etc.

(4)define data analysis method(s).: ... .ca.culaMwfli~i ty ihnaxpzol reiul ts.' 5)ein mtod t nirp rsut.:.:.:': §. ...................... .... ... :::i . ..... _

* J)define meithods to develop and serify . . ... .

needed models and codes.::::::: ::::::::::::::.:: :......: : .:::::::.............

*::::aplete Lecficel planninQ; eg-task sequence network, define input/output interfaces.

identify interim & final conclusion docuientation i

.: LTe Mal_ .k Flow.

'"7i

- iTests S it4'A -z-Ari X-. - 4 .; .. .... s .A :J- r-a -- X:. g-tett B in *ni .. t....ilt

test equipment D:esigi test facility ......1trumjentation-:-'-- and/or mdif caations^.- .

te instaiiitioz, check-etA. coiibraetlo ^. .. .,.

.u I facility maintenance plnning ^... ... .. .... t... .

::Prepare technicol proocedures:: :....:..for test conduct- :.:::.bHP

..R.....:..:. .: : .

-a....... ........... ......,,

Con~duct tESt &D te 4C v sitJiaPCcipile raw &reduced data Record Report1

... ............ ............ 1. .... .........

1p~J~arq techn cal procecdures for :etat s frnalysest model formulationeo

........ . ............. .. . .. .

AsseCile study ats anal ysis Cbts AdIot ion |findings PR AiTzort 1

. ... .. .. .. .. .. . . .. ... ....... ........ .... . .. ... ..... .. ... . . ... ...1 . .

i ,.t to WSwpenrqXrfafoce psSrtcrs

sits felsiesiuitvy a ycuasiaisJ '4ta pkL*JVwv far design

A T I - I 6ATTAOMrEhT 6

1 &U.S. DEPARTMENTOF ENERGY


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

QUALITY ASSURANCE MEETING


RICHLAND, WASHINGTON

I


BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTDECEMBER 10-12, 1984-


December 10, 1984

8;15 a.m.8:309:3012:00 noon1:00 p.m.

2:004:00

5:00

DOE Introduction and Welcome

NRC Introduction and DiscussionOverview - BWIP Quality Assurance

LunchOverview - Rockwell Quality AssuranceProgram for BWIPBWIP Management Systems and Controls

Rockwell QA/Management Systems

Adjourn

DOE

NRC

DOE

Rockwell

Rockwell

Rockwell

j - - :




December 11, 1984

8:15 a.m.

9:30

11:00

12:00 noon

1:00 p.m.3:00

4:30

Review and Discuss Project OfficeQuality Assurance PlanReview and Discuss Implementation ofBWIP Management Systems and ControlsQuestions, Answers, Comments

LunchExit Meeting PreparationExit Meeting (Reconvene)Adjourn

DOE

Rockwell

All

AllAll

December 12, 1984

8:00 a.m.

12:00 noon

Field Tour - Depart

Return to RichlandEnd of Meeting and Tour

- Z

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT

OVERVIEW

* PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PHILOSOPHY

* DOE SAFETY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM

* BWIP QUALITY PROGRAM

- ORGANIZATION

- RESPONSIBILITIES

* MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS

* PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

* PROGRAM ASSESSMENT

* ISSUES

* IMPLEMENTATION

- ~ _2- r ~- or. .. _,ruI

- -


QUALITY ASSURANCE PHILOSOPHY

° QUALITY PERFORMANCE - DO IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME

* PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND QUALITYASSURANCE ARE INSEPARABLE

* BWIP IS DEVELOPING DISCIPLINED PROJECT MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS AND CONTROLS

° DOE AND NRC QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AREMINIMUMS

* LINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE- ACCOUNTABILITY RESTS WITH PROJECT OFFICE

- INDEPENDENT REVIEW BY SEPARATE QUALITY ASSURANCEORGANIZATION

* DOE EXPERIENCE

I

-

DOE SAFETY AND QA SYSTEMQUALITY PERFORMANCE

* PLAN WHAT YOU DO

* DO WHAT YOU PLAN

* DOCUMENT WHAT YOU DID

* EVALUATE YOUR PERFORMANCE

* IMPROVE YOUR PLANS AND PERFORMANCE

'I-

r-

DOE SAFETY AND QA SYSTEM

SIMPLE JOB

02IL

lJiId0 w

_ >-K XOw

ZI-> LL

O a

114

0 >-Z F-IL >0 I

_a.

00/

100%

F

A SMALL AMOUNT OF PLANNINGACHIEVES NEAR OPTIMUMPRODUCTIVITY AND SAFETYEXCELLENCE

0% 0a QUALITY PERFORMANCE 100%

EFFORT NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE OPTIMUMPRODUCTIVITY AND SAFETY EXCELLENCE

01I..

-- I.'-

A * .�

4'Slir �DOE SAFETY AND QA SYSTEM

- COMPLEX JOB

w

2 W_ -

M X0 wF-C-)Ow

> LL

0 0<¢ Z

U >z LIJL >o P

In D

0a.

0%

cIa1- I

c / LARGE AMOUNT OFTRAINING, PLANNING,PROCEDURES, DOCU-MENTATION, ETC. ISREQUIRED TO ACHIEVENEAR OPTIMUMPRODUCTIVITY ANDSAFETY EXCELLENCE

100%0% < QUALITY PERFORMANCE-S. 100%

RISK OF NOT ACHIEVING OPTIMUMPRODUCTIVITY AND SAFETY EXCELLENCE

-. -,,

. . - -

-- - - I


ELEMENTS FOR ACHIEVING OPTIMUMPRODUCTIVITY AND SAFETY EXCELLENCE

(QUALITY PERFORMANCE)

* EVERYTHING WITHIN THE CONTRACTORS' MANAGEMENTSYSTEM:- CONCEPTUAL DESIGN- FUNCTIONAL DESIGN CRITERIA- SAR- EIS- CONSTRUCTION- ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION- PROCEDURES- ACCEPTANCE/OPERATIONAL TESTING- TRAINING- ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS- APPRAISALS- AUDITS-ORR- ETC.

L I


COMPLEX TECHNICAL OPERATION

0 U)a iJ-

W -j

enwI Co a41 U ) u

IL 0 cc0 Cf

cc149L

rO AUDITS, APPRAISALS AND AWARD FEE 4

TIME

I' - _I.


USDOE ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY, HEALTH ANDQUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

SECRETARY |

LEGEND: ASSISTANT SECRETARY

LINE MANAGEMENT - ASSISTANT SECRETARY POICY, SAFETY

OEVE--PROGRAMSANOVERVIEW*- - PROGRAM POLICY ENVIRONMENT

* PROGRAM MISSION * STANDARDS AND POLICY* PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION * OVERVIEW

* MATRIX SUPPORT

OPERATIONS OFFICEMANAGER

PROGRAM DIVISION ES&H AND QA

CONTRACTOR [ ------CHIEF EXECUTIVE

PCNROGRAOPERATION ES&H AND QACONTROL

l*.

r,

"' OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

FIELD OFFICE AND CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITY FOR OGR PROJECTS

DIRECTOROFFICE OF CIVILIAN

RADIOACTIVE WASTEMANAGEMENT

Ie - - - -

OFFICE OFGEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES

(HEADQUARTERS)

I

I I I I

SALT SITESCHICAGO OPERATIONS

OFFICE (SRPO)

. _f - . -- -- - .

TUFF SITE BASALT SITE CRYSTALLINE ROCKNEVADA OPERATIONS RICHLAND OPERATIONS SITESI CHICAGO OPERATIONS

OFFICE (NNWSI) OFFICE (BWIP)OFFICE (CRPO)

.- uII

BATTELLE MEMORIALINSTITUTE

II

MULTIPLEPARTICIPATING

ORGANIZATIONS

. w_ ___ ______ ___

ROCKWELL BATTELLE MEMORIALINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE

- PROGRAM/PROJECT MANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITY

L

- - - - - MAJOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT

1%r

OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENTFIELD OFFICE AND CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT

RESPONSIBILITY FOR OGR PROJECTS

DIRECTOROFFICE OF CIVILIAN

RADIOACTIVE WASTEMANAGEMENT

I

OFFICE OFGEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES

(HEADQUARTERS)

{ IMPLEMENT NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT, P.L. 97-425

* PROVIDE POLICY GUIDANCE, DIRECTION AND CONTROL

* ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE OCRWM PROGRAM-WIDE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

II a

BASALT SITERICHLAND OPERATIONS

OFFICE (BWIP)

I

ROCKWELLINTERNATIONAL

* MANAGE AND DIRECT DOE'S PROGRAM TO DEVELOP MINEDGEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES

* ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT THE HO OA PROGRAM

* OA DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE TO FIELD ORGANIZATION ANDVERIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION

* MANAGE AND DIRECT THE BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT

* ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT THE PROJECT OA PROGRAM

* TECHNICAL AND GA DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE TO ROCKWELLINTERNATIONAL

* VERIFICATION OF OVERALL OWIP OA PROGRAM

* DAY TO DAY MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SWIPTECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS

* ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT A ROCKWELL OA PROGRAM FORDWIP

* TECHNICAL AND GA DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE TOPARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS

* ASSURE COORDINATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATIONOF GA PRGRAM BY ALL PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE

. . .

OFFICEOF TIlE

MANAGER h-i_.

OFFICEOF CHIEF COUNSEL

OFFICE[OOF EXTERNAL AFFAIRSI

PUBLIC AFFAIRSOf FICE

4

I I I I- , i

1r � .

OFFICEOF ASSISTANT MANAGER

fOiR SAFETY. SAFEGUARDS

_QAIYASSURANCE

OFFICE OFASSISTANT MANAGER FOR

COMMERCIAL NUCLEARWASTE AND _ CTSJ

I

SAFETY AND GUAI ITY CNSTRUCTONASSURANCE DIVISION DIVISION F

SAFEGUARD5 AND FACILITIES AND SITESECURITY DIVISION SERVICES DIVISION

PlOJECT CONTfROL

I Of fICE _

FUELS A MATERIALSEXAMINATION FACILIl

PROJECT OFFICE

FUSION MATERIALSIRRADIATION TESTFACILITY PROJECT

OFFICE

OFFICE OFFICEOF ASSISTANT MANAGER OF ASSISTAN1 MANAGER

FOR ENERGY FOR DEFENSE

R REEDER TECHNOLOGY SURPLUS FACILITIESDIVISION ANAGEMENF PROGRAM

OFFICE

| FFTF OPERA ION S.[|ENGINEERING DIVISION WASTE MANAGEMENT

DIVISION

ENERGYPROGRAMS DIVISION NUCLEAR MATERIALS

PRODUCTION DIVISION

INFORMATIONCLASSIFICATION OFFICE

FINANCIAL|MANAGEMENT DIVISION

I OFFICEOF ASSISTANT MANAGER

| FOR ADMINISTRATION

_ _

I BUDGET DIVISIOJADP A

TELECOMMUNICATIONSIDIVISION

|N PERSONNL LMAND ANAGEMENT

EVALUATION DIVISION J

IPROERMENT DIVISION1

SIIIPPINGPORTSTATION

DECOMMISSIONINGPROJECT OFFICE

I

BASALT WASTEISOLATION

PROJECT OFFICE

PROCESS FACILITY IiODIFICATIONPROJECT OFFICE

e .

COMMERCIALSPENT FUEL

MANAGEMENT PROGR AMI

SPECIAL ISOTOPESEPARATION PROJECT

OFFICE

- -0

A

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

RICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE

! ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FORALL FIELD OFFICE ACTIVITIES

* MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE QUALITYASSURANCE IN COMPLIANCEWITH REQUIREMENTS

MANAGERDOE-RL

I

* MANAGER DELEGATES DAY TODAY MANAGEMENT ANDIMPLEMENTATION OF FIELDOFFICE RESPONSIBILITIESTHROUGH THE ASSISTANTMANAGERS

aI| ASSISTANT MANAGER

FOR ADMINISTRATION

1

PROCUREMENTDIVISION

* MANAGE AND IMPLEMENT THEPROCUREMENT PROCESS

* OBTAIN REQUIRED TECHNICAL ANDQA REVIEWS AND APPROVALS

. . . . . _ , .

ASSISTANT MANAGERFOR COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR

WASTE AND PROJECTS

ASSISTANT MANAGERFOP SAFETY, SAFEGUARDS

& QUALITY ASSURANCE

BASALT WASTEISOLATION PROJECT

OFFICE

I . .

SAFETY AND QUALITYASSURANCE DIVISION

. S _

* PROVIDE OVERALL MANAGEMENTAND DIRECTION OF THE BWIP

* ESTABLISH, IMPLEMENT ANDVERIFY THE OVERALL BWIP GAPROGRAM

* RETAIN RESPONSIBILITY ANDACCOUNTABILITY FOR OWIP GAPROGRAM

* TECHNICAL AND GA DIRECTIONAND GUIDANCE TO ROCKWELLINTERNATIONAL

* PERFORM REQUIRED PROCURE-MENT REVIEWS AND APPROVALS

* MANAGE AND DIRECT HANFORDSITEWIDE GA PROGRAM

* ASSIST IN DEVELOPMENT OF OWIPGA PROGRAM

* PROVIDE INDEPENDENT REVIEWAND APPROVAL OF KEY BWIP GAACTIONS

* PROVIDE INDEPENDENTVERIFICATION AND ASSESSMENTOF BWIP GA PROGRAM

* PERFORM REQUIRED PROCURE-MENT REVIEWS AND APPROVALS

kL

-


ORGANIZATION, .

MANAGERDOE-RL

- a -

I I

LPROCUREMENTDIVISION

F STAFFSUPPOR-

|SUPPORT


OFFICE

STAFFSUPPORT&

INDEPENDENTVERIFICATION

SAFETY & QUALITYASSURANCE

DIVISION

I ICONTRAC 1EXECUTIOt

r .~II

TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT& OA VERIFICATION

- *-

ITECHNICAL

& QA DIRECTION

.. p

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION

TECHNICAL MANAGER(ROCKWELL)

1-74

TECHNICAL & GA DIRECTION& OA VERIFICATION

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

4

CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER 4-

4OTHER

CONTRACTORS

lb - - -


PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSAND CONTROLS

* BWIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCEWITH DOE ORDERS

° HIERARCHY OF WORK REQUIREMENTS AND CONTROLSESTABLISHED

* BASELINE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY DOE HQ

- MISSION PLAN

- GENERIC REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT

- BWIP PROJECT CHARTER

* BASELINE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY PROJECTOFFICE

- BWIP PROJECT PLAN

- BWIP PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

- BWIP SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN

- BWIP SITE SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTPROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN

* STRUCTURES THE CONTENT AND CHARTS THE COURSE FORTHE TECHNICAL PROGRAM

* ASSURES WORK REQUIREMENTS ARE MISSION DERIVED

- SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROGRAM

- WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

* SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF DATA REQUIREMENTS

* PRESENTS A HIERARCHY OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ANDDOCUMENTATION

* SUPPORTS AND INTEGRATES QA ACCOUNTABILITY ANDTRACEABILITY WITHIN ITS FRAMEWORK

L

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTPROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS

KEY MANAGEMENT CONTROL DOCUMENTS

° QUALITY ASSURANCE PLANS

* RECORDS MANAGEMENT PLAN

° CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN

* PROCUREMENT PLAN

---- -4

/0 I


QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT* PREVIOUSLY

* CURRENTLY

* FUTURE

FORMAL QA PROGRAMS DEVELOPED ANDDOCUMENTED IN DOE HO AND FIELD OFFICE ORDERSAND GUIDANCE

DOE ROLE ONE OF QA DIRECTION AND VERIFICATON

CONTRACTOR ROLE ONE OF DEVELOPMENT ANDIMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT SPECIFIC QA PLANS

FOCUS ON DEVELOPING MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECTSPECIFIC QA PLANS AND PROCEDURES

INCLUDES DOE AS WELL AS CONTRACTORS ANDOTHER PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGING NEEDS OF PROJECT

RELIES UPON DEVELOPMENT OF DISCIPLINEDPROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND CONTROLS

PROJECT OFFICE QA PLAN ISSUED AND PROCEDURESBEING PREPARED

FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION AND DEBUGGING PRIORTO ISSUANCE OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLAN

COMPLETE PREPARATION OF IDENTIFIEDPROCEDURES

L

001,


ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIESAND REQUIREMENTS

DOE 5700.6A

RL 5700.1A

ANSI/ASME NOA-1

BWIP PROJECT MANAGEMENT(HO) OGR QA PLAN(OGR/B-3)


OFFICEQUALITY ASSURANCE

PLAN

. .

NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT

10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B

10 CFR 60

OTHER DIRECTION

QA PROGRAM PLANTECHNICAL MANAGER

(ROCKWELL)

J

X 'I JrARCHITECT- CONSTRUCTION

ENGINEER MANAGERQA PLAN QA PLAN

HANFORD ROCKWELLDIRECT FUNDED SUBCONTRACTORSCONTRACTORS OA PLANS

QA PLANS

- . t

- s

t BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT

PROJECT OFFICE

* QA PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTPROGRESS HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALQA PLAN PREPARED AND ISSUED TO HQ FOR REVIEW AND APPROVALREQUIRED IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIEDOUTSTANDING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED FORRESOLUTION

* QA PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATIONPREPARATION OF IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES INITIATED AND SCHEDULEFOR COMPLETION ESTABLISHEDCHALLENGES AHEAD TO COMPLETE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMPRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLANVERIFICATION EFFORTS INTENSIFIED, RESULTING IN IDENTIFICATION OFAREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN ROCKWELL QA PROGRAM

ROCKWELL (TECHNICAL MANAGER)

* QA PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATIONOUTSTANDING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATIONREQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED FOR RESOLUTIONACTION PLANS BEING DEVELOPED TO ASSURE RESOLUTION PRIOR TOISSUANCE OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLAN

1% - -- -


QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMKEY ISSUES AND ACTIONS

ISSUE

* DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT PROJECTMANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS

* HQ APPROVAL OF PROJECT OFFICEQA PLAN

* ADDITIONAL IMPLEMENTINGPROCEDURE REQUIRED

* AVAILABILITY OF RESOURCESNECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE QAPROGRAM

* DETERMINATION OF ITEMS ANDACTIVITIES IMPORTANT TO SAFETY ORWASTE ISOLATION

* ESTABLISH FORMALIZED APPROACH TODETERMINING GRADED GA

* DESIGN CONTROL AS APPLIED TOHARDWARE AND SITECHARACTERIZATION

* ACCEPTANCE OF PAST ACTIVITIESCONDUCTED UNDER PREVIOUS GAPROGRAM CONTROLS

ACTION

* REVIEW AND APPROVE SYSTEMENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN (4/85)

REVIEW AND APPROVE PROJECTMANAGEMENT PLAN (6/85)

* RECEIVE AND RESOLVE COMMENTS ANDISSUE QA PLAN (1/85)

* COMPLETE PREPARATION OF IDENTIFIEDPROCEDURES (6/85)

* IDENTIFY COURSE OF ACTION TO RESOLVETHIS (2/85)

* CURRENTLY EVALUATED ON A CASE BYCASE BASIS. ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTREQUIRED TO RESOLVE THIS AREA (1L/85)

* POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTED THROUGHVERIFICATION PLANNING. CLOSELY TIEDTO ABOVE (10/85)

* REVIEW AND APPROVE SYSTEMENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN, PROJECTMANAGEMENT PLAN, AND PREPAREIMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES (6/85)

* ESTABLISH A FORMAL PROCESS FORREVIEW ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS TODETERMINE ACCEPTANCE (10/85)

I

ROCKWELL HANFORD OPERATIONS

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM OVERVIEW

E.B. ASH

PRODUCTIVITY ANDADVANCED PLANNING

DIRECTORA. CAMPISE

CHIEF COUNSELR. S. GRUHN

INFORMATION SYSTEMSDIRECTOR

J. 0. PERKINS

ROCKWELL HANFORDOPERATIONS

VICE PRESIDENT ANDGENERAL MANAGER

P. G. LORENZINI

ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERA. C. CRAWFORD

* LEGAL COUNSEL* ADP SERVICES

U --


DIRECTORE. B. ASH

ASSOCIATE DIRECTORR. J. GIMERA

* TOTAL RESPONSIBILITYFOR MANAGEMENT OFPROJECT

RESEARCH ANDENGINEERING

DIRECTORJ. H. ROECKER

I --

PLANTOPERATIONS

DIRECTORA. L. REESER

l

CHEMICAL PROCESSINGPROGRAM DIRECTOR

C. V. Di POL

WASTE MANAGEMENTPROGRAM DIRECTOR

R. D. PROSSER

SPECIAL ISOTOPESEPARATION PROJECT

PROGRAM DIRECTOR (ACTING)J. E. TOOMEY

I I I I

PERSONNEL ANDPUBLIC RELATIONS

DIRECTORJ. W. DONAHUE

SAFETY ANDQUALITY ASSURANCE

DIRECTORJ. W. PATTERSON

SITESERVICES

DIRECTORR. J. MC DERMOTT

FINANCE ANDINFORMATION SERVICES

* DIRECTORM. BELLOFATTO

PROGRAM BUSINESSMANAGEMENT

DIRECT ORM. P. LARSON

* PERSONNEL TRAINING* EMPLOYMENT* PUBLIC RELATIONS

* SAFETY DEVELOPMENT/SURVEILLANCE/AUDIT

* QUALITY ASSURANCEPROGRAM DEVELOPMENTAND VERIFICATION

* SECURITY* MAINTENANCE* PROCUREMENT

* ACCOUNTING* COST REPORTING

* PROJECT BUDGET/COSi/SCHEDULE/CHANGECONTROL

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTROCKWELL ORGANIZATION

Q 4UALITY ASSURANCE 'I IMPLEMENTATION IL-- A


DiRECTORE. B. ASH

ASSOCIATE DIRECTORR. J. GIMERA -I---------------_

QUALITYASSURANCEMANAGERM. f. NICOL 1

* PROJECTMANAGEMENT

* QUALITY ASSURANCERESPONSIBILITY

* QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMDEVELOPMENT

* QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMVERIFICATION

* MATRIX SUPPORT

I

RESEARCHAND

LICENSING

MANAGERL. R. FITCH

ENGINEERINGAND

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGERL. CONNELL

IPROJECT INTEGRATION

ANDPERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

MANAGERB. T. WILDE

II I

Chart 1

RESEARCHAND

LICENSING

MANAGERL. R. fITCH

QUALITY ASSURANCEI IMPLEMENTATION I

SITE LICENSING BARRIER

MANAGE R MANAGE R MANAGE RG. S. HUNT J. GRAHAM M. J. SMllH

* SITE GEOLOGY *NRC INTERACTIONS *CONCEPTUALAND HYDROLOGY DESIGN OF WASTE

* LICENSING PACKAGE*GEOCIIEMICAL APPLICATION

TESTING 11:4Z * WASTE PACKAtE

* PUBiLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS

_TESI POGRA

Chart 2

ENGINE ERINGAND

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGERI CONNELL

I…t-|4QUALITY ASSURANCEI IMPLEMENTATION II------------------J

I-

ENGINEERINGDESIGN

MANAGERJ. L. ASH

* A-E MANAGEMENT

* ENGINEERINGSTUDIES

* REPOSITORYSEALING

ENGINE EHINGDEVELOPMENT

MANAGERD. J. DODDS

* GEOMECHANICSTESTING

* GEOMECHIANICSMODELING

* EQUIPMENTDEVELOPMENT

FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION

MANAGER11. W. BRANDT

*C-M MANAGEMENT

_

NSTF ANDLABORATORY

SUPPORTPROJECTMANAGER

G. S. DINTSCtl

* TEST FACILITIESMAINTENANCE

* NSTF OPERATIONS

EXPLORATORYSHAFT

PROGRAM

MANAGERH. B. DIETZ

* EXPLORATORY SHAFT

* PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Chart 3

PROJECT INTEGRATIONAND

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

MANAGERR. T. WILDE

- - - -_ - - - -… - - - - - - - -

QUALITY ASSURANCEa IMPLEMENTATION

lR .E A tMSIWN

PERFORMANCE ENDTNEERING PROJECTASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT INTEGRATION

MANAGE R MANAGER MANAGERR. G. BACA R. E. MAY R. M. SCI IWENK

*PERFORMANCE *DATA *PROJECTASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT INTEGRATON

* CONFIGURATIONMANAGEMENT

* RECORDSMANAGEMENT

Chart 4

BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECTDIRECT FUNDED CONTRACTORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ANDINDEPENDENT QA VERIFICATION

TECHNICAIJSCHEDU LE/COSTIQAI II II II II I

I I

DOE-RL

ROCKWELL BASALT WASTEISOLATION PROJECT -----

INDEPENDENT QA VERIFICATION

TECHNICAL/SCHEDULE/COST/QA~~~r -----------------: 1I .I

f + .+

MORRISON-KNUDSEN RKE-PB PACIFIC NORTHWESTLABORATORIES

WESTINGHOUSEHANFORD COMPANY

* NORCUS* U.S.G.S.* U. OF WASHINGTON* WASH.DEPT. OF

NATURAL RESOURCES

* ES CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER

a ES/REPOSITORY DESIGN * HYDROLOGICMODELING

* GEOCHEMISTRYSTUDIES

* AGE DATING OFGROUNDWATER

* OPERATES HOT CELLEXPERIMENTS ONWASTE/BARRIER/ROCK/WATERINTERACTIONS

* CHLORINE GROUNDWATERAGE DATING

* GROUNDWATER FLOW INFRACTURED MEDIA

* ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FORLSPT

* WATER/ROCK INTERACTIONSTUDIES TO EVALUATEORIGINS OF OBSERVEDBASALT HYDROCHEMISTRY

* HYDROLOGIC MODELING* GEOLOGIC MAPPING* REGIONAL SEISMIC

MONITORING NETWORK

ROCKWELL SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

. . . _

GENERAL MANAGER

ROCKWELL

II I

BASALTWASTE

ISOLATION

I

SITE SERVICESSAFETY &QUALITY-- - - - - - l

/I

PROJECT ASSURANA I1 I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

II

II

MATERIAL - - - - MTRA N _RPFUNCTIONS QUALITY PQ

ASSURANCE

I_ r

* PURCIIASIN6* DELIVERY* PROCUREMENT

PLANS* RECEIVING* WAREHOUSING* SHIIPPING* EXPEDITING* FINANCIAL

AUDIT* LEASING* SMALL

BUSINESS* CONTRACTING

* PROCUREMENTSUPPORT

* MATERIALINTERFACE

* TECHNICAL PLANS* ADMIN. PLANS* TECHNICAL AND

QA DIRECTION

* COST ACCOUNTMANAGEMENT

* STATEMENTS OFWORK

* TECHNICALACCEPTANCE

* RECORDS* QA REQUIREMENTS* REVIEW

PROCUREMENTDOCUMENTS

TECHNICALSERVICES

.A

DELIVERABLEHARDWARE

1% * DOCUMENTREVIEW ANDAPPROVAL

* INSPECTIONPLANNING

* SOURCESURVEY

* SUPPLIERAUDITS

* IN-PROCESSINSPECTION

* RECEIVINGINSPECTION

* SUPPLIEREVALUATION

PS85-2027

WORK SCOPE - ROCKWELL SUBCONTRACTORS

QA REQUIREMENTS APPLIED:

LABORATORY ANALYSIS* BETA ANALYTICAL* JFT AGAPITO* LANL(MODELING)* DYNATECH* ROCKWELL SCIENCE CENTER* HYDRO GEOLCHEM* KRUEGER* OREGON STATE UNIVERSITYL TEMPLE UNIVERSITY* UNION CARBIDE* PITTSBURGH TESTING LABS.* UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA* UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI* UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI

EARTHSCIENCES(Seismic, Geophysics)* ANALYTICAL SERVICES* DRESSER* WASHINGTON STATE

UNIVERSITY* EMERALD EXPLORATION* WESTON* SIERRA GEOPHYSICS

ENGINEERING AND TEST* RE/SPEC* GILBERT-

COMMONWEALTH* WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC* COLORADO SCHOOL OF

MINES* HYDROTECHNIQUE

TECHNICAL SERVICES* APPLIED MECHANICS* LANL* GOLDER* ANALYTICAL AND

COMP. RESEARCH* IN SITU INC.* FENNIX & SCISSION* WOODWARD-CLYDE* WASHINGTON STATE

UNIVERSITY

PEER REVIEW* IT CORPORATION* D'APPOLONIA

NO QA REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE* TYPICAL SERVICES INCLUDE: GRAPHICS, LEASES, MAINTENANCE, SUPPLIES, REPAIR

(NON-CRITICAL ITEMS)* VARIES FROM 60 TO 90 CONTRACTS IN PLACE AT ANY ONE TIME

TYPICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTSBY CONTRACT TYPE

LABORATORY ANALYSIS, SEISMIC, GEOPHYSICS, ENGINEERING,AND ENGINEERING TEST

• FORMAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM/PLAN TO NQA-1 CRITERIA

* DESIGN CONTROL (ENGINEERING AND TEST)

* SUBTIER QUALITY ASSURANCE CONTROLS

• WRITTEN PROCEDURES/DRAWINGS

* DOCUMENT CONTROL

* CALIBRATION

* NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING

* CORRECTIVE ACTION

* QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS

* SOURCE VERIFICATION (BY ROCKWELL)

TECHNICAL SERVICES AND PEER REVIEW

* DEFINED RESPONSIBILITIES

* PROCEDURES (AS APPLICABLE)

• QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS

GROWTH IN QA NEEDS

ATRANSITION

PHASE

CURRENTQA

ACTIVITIESSCOPE AND

EXTENT OF QAPROGRAM

NEEDS

I

i / IEXPANDED-s I / I < -QA

- / ACTIVITIES

/ 10CFR60* 10 CFR 50, APP. B

/$ I *NQA-1I I * NRC REVIEW PLANI FY1985 I * NWPA, 1982

II I

)N A 12/85 SITE CHARACTERliIN, REPORT ISSUI

_ I I II I

DOE ORDER RL 5700.1

"SELECTIVE ANDJUDICIOUS APPLICATIC

OF NQA-1 "

ZATIONED

SITEEXPLORATION

PHASE

SITECHARACTERIZATION

PHASE

CURRENT QA PROJECT DOCUMENTS(INCLUDES MATRIX SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS)

* BWIP QA PROGRAM PLAN (RHO-QA-PL-3)- REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION- QA PROGRAM INDEX- PREPARED BY QA ORGANIZATION/DOE-RL APPROVAL- ADDRESS 18 CRITERIA

* BWIP QA PROGRAM MANUAL (RHO-BWI-MA-14)- ADDRESS IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAM PLAN- ORGANIZED BY 18 CRITERIA- QA PROGRAM PROCEDURES (40 RELEASED)- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES (6 RELEASED)- PREPARED BY IMPLEMENTING ORGANIZATIONS/APPROVED BY QA- CONTROLLED BY QA ORGANIZATION

* BASALT OPERATING PROCEDURES MANUAL (RHO-BWI-MA-4)- TECHNICAL PROCEDURES (88 PROCEDURES)- PREPARED BY TECHNICAL STAFF/APPROVED BY QA- CONTROLLED BY ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

CURRENT QA PROJECT DOCUMENTS (CONT.)(INCLUDES MATRIX SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS)

* RECORDS MANAGEMENT PLAN (SD-BWI-AP-001)- BASALT RECORDS MANAGEMENT CENTER- MICROFILMING- PREPARED BY PROJECT MANAGEMENT STAFF/APPROVED BY QA

* SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT PLAN (DRAFT)- CONTROL OF COMPUTER CODES/PROGRAMS- SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT- PREPARED BY PROJECT MANAGEMENT STAFF/APPROVED BY QA

CURRENT QA PROGRAM KEY FEATURES

* DESIGN CONTROL (11 PROCEDURES)- BASELINE IDENTIFICATION- VERIFICATION/BENCHMARKING- PEER REVIEW- DESIGN REVIEW- CHANGE CONTROL- INTERFACE CONTROL

* SURVEILLANCE AND INSPECTION (7 PROCEDURES)FY 1984 ACTIVITIES - HARDWARE SUBCONTRACTORS- 10 SUPPLIER SOURCE INSPECTIONS- 3 SUPPLIER SURVEILLANCES- 4 PRE-AWARD SURVEYS- 2 RESIDENT INSPECTORS

FY 1984 ACTIVITIES - ROCKWEL, BWIP CONTRACTORS, AND SERVICE SUBCONTRACTORS- 215 SURVEILLANCE REPORTS- 6 SUPPLIER SOURCE SURVEYS

* AUDITS (3 PROCEDURES) FY 1984 ACTIVITIES- 1 INTERNAL AUDIT- 5 SUPPLIER AUDITS- 4 VERIFICATION AUDITS (INTERNAL)

* 51 QA PROGRAM MANUAL PROCEDURES IN DEVELOPMENT

CURRENT QA PROGRAM KEY FEATURES (CONT.)

* PROCUREMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL (10 PROCEDURES)- QA PLANNING- DOCUMENT REVIEW- CHANGE CONTROL

• DOCUMENT CONTROL (10 PROCEDURES)- QA PROGRAM MANUAL- FIELD AND FACILITY PROCEDURES- SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS- ENGINEERING RELEASE- PUBLIC CLEARANCE

* FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST CONTROL (88 PROCEDURES)- GEOSCIENCES- HYDROLOGY- MATERIALS TESTING

* QA RECORDS (6 PROCEDURES)- RECORDS MANAGEMENTSYSTEM- DATA RECORDING- TEST DATA

* QA STAFF- BWIPQA(21 PERSONS)

FORMULATION OF FY 1985 QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION PLAN

* NQA-1* 1OCFR50,APP.B* NRC REVIEW PLAN

I' cun~O. DEFINE

ISSUES _PI

QUALITYASSURANCE

ACTION PLAN

CURRENT QAPROGRAM

PS8S-2027

ISSUES IDENTIFIED WITH CURRENTQA PROGRAM

* 51 NEW PROCEDURES (MINIMUM) ARE REQUIRED - EXAMPLES:- "Q" LIST - ITEMS AND ACTIVITIES AFFECTING QUALITY- MANAGEMENT APPROVAL AUTHORITY- TREND REPORTING/SUPPLIER SELECTION/CONTROL OF SUPPLIER DOCUMENTS- QA PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION

* EXISTING PROCEDURES REQUIRE UPDATE - EXAMPLES:- PEER REVIEW- ORGANIZATION CHARTERS- DESIGN REVIEW- INTERFACE CONTROL- RECORDS MANAGEMENT

* TRAINING PROGRAM NEEDS AUGMENTATION

* OVERALL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DISCIPLINE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

* MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE QA AWARENESS NEEDS INTENSIFICATION

* AUDIT/SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY NEED ACCELERATION

* ROCKWELL INTERNAL CHARTER ISSUES NEED RESOLUTION

ISSUES IDENTIFIED WITH CURRENTQA PROGRAM

* ROLES OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION

e INCREASE QA STAFFING NEEDED

• QA TREND ANALYSIS NEEDED TO AID MANAGEMENT IN CONTROLLING GENERICPROBLEMS

* EXTERNAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW OF PROGRAM REQUIRED

* LARGE MICROFILMING BACKLOG NEEDS REDUCTION

* BASELINED TEST PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL ONGOING ACTIVITIES

* USGS LACK OF CONCURRENCE WITH QA REQUIREMENTS

KEY FEATURES OF ADDITIONAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENTACTIVITIES

MAJOR AUGMENTATION OF THE CURRENT OVERALL PROJECTMANAGEMENT APPROACH

UTILIZES A DISCIPLINED PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGYSUCCESSJULLY UTILIZED ON OTHER COMPLEX MAJOR SYSTEMPROGRAMS

TO BE FULLY IMPLEMENTED BY END OF FY 1985

COMPATIBLE WITH SITE CHARACTERIZATION QUALITY ASSURANCEREQUIREMENTS

QUALITY ASSURANCE IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIESINTEGRATED INTO LINE ORGANIZATIONS

ELEMENTS OF THE DISCIPLINEDMANAGEMENT APPROACH

A IDENTIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF MISSION REQUIREMENTSTO INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM ELEMENTS

* OVERALL SYSTEM ANALYSIS USING ESTABLISHEEDMETHODOLOGIES

* ESTABLISHMENT OF QUALITY AS AN INTEGRAL PART OFPROGRAM MANAGEMENT

M UNIFORM DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM

* TRACEABILITY OF REQUIREMENTS

* UNIFORM DECISION METHODOLOGY

* CONFIGURATION AND CHANGE CONTROL

* LOGICAL DEFINITION OF INTERRELATED WORK ELEMENTS

* TREATMENT AS AN INTERACTING SYSTEM

* DEFINITION AND CONTROL OF INTERFACES

* CLEAR FOCUS OF RESPONSIBILITIES/CHARTERS

THE ""SYSTEM"OVERALL MISSION

REQUIREMENTS

,,,, _ - I -- _.

DESIGN REQUIREMENTSTEST REQUIREMENTSQUALITY ASSURANCE

REQUIREMENTS

/

//

//

IlSITE

IIIIII

REPOSITORY X

I

III

II½1aEXTERNAL

INTERFACES

I I%% ._

PS85-2027

RECENT ROCKWELL ACCOMPLISHMENTSAND STATUS

* SYSTEM ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLETE (10/84 DRAFT)* PROJECT PLAN IN WORK (12/84 DRAFT MILESTONE)

* PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PREPARATION (4/85 DRAFT MILESTONE)* MANY NEW PROCEDURES/PLANS IN DRAFT FORM - EXAMPLES:

- SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PLAN IMPLEMENTATION- PEER REVIEW PROCEDURE- CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN- EXPLORATORY SHAFT TEST PLAN- PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PLAN- SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT PLAN- GEOSCIENCE PROGRAM PLAN

* DOCUMENT HIERARCHY DRAFT COMPLETED (5/84)

* DETAILED FY 1985 IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING UNDER WAY

* QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION PLAN IN PREPARATION (12/84 DRAFT MILESTONE)

RECENT ROCKWELL ACCOMPLISHMENTSAND STATUS (CONT.)

* BUDGET AUGMENTATION DEFINED ($1.6M) AND PROPOSED TO DOE

* RHO-BW-MA-14 (QA PROGRAM MANUAL) RELEASED

- CONSOLIDATES QA PROCEDURES WITHIN PROJECT

* RECENT DOE AUDITS DEFINED SEVERAL GENERIC DEFICIENCIES NOW BEINGCORRECTED

* ALL LABS WERE SHUT DOWN FOR 3-5 MONTHS TO UPGRADE PROCEDURES ANDDOCUMENT CORRECTION OF QUALITY DEFICIENCIES

* BWIP-ROCKWELL PROJECT MANAGEMENT STAFF AUGMENTED

* ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES MADE TO CLARIFY RESPONSIBILITY

- RECORDS MANAGEMENT- CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

* NEW PROCEDURE ISSUED FOR CONTROL OF DIRECT FUNDED CONTRACTORS

* INTERCONTRACTOR QA COORDINATION GROUP ESTABLISHED

RECENT ROCKWELL ACCOMPLISHMENTSAND STATUS (CONT.)

* DISCIPLINED METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING SITE CHARACTERIZATION NEEDSESTABLISHED

* INTEGRATED QA PLAN IN PREPARATION

* QA TRAINING COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED

* MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) IMPLEMENTED

a

aobi9r AE PE COWMAT AWlS'7

o SOW Afe lE AVWl AZ7W

10 .AV J SnZVMT AEEOW°o S lw ASlffi34w /7W sn ~ ADlafrY ASSM"MMWV ?^

:... . . . . . .. . . .m. u E M . . . . .-~ . .. . . . ........

n a S/Y n b% 1(a4T1o HIv MIrh

- Candidate Site Identification,- Environmental Assessment,- Presidential Selection.

-Natural Sciences Investigations,-Conceplual & Preliminary Design,-Assessment of Isolation Performance,- Site Hecommendation Data,- Presidential Site Recommendation.

-- Apply for Construction AutIhrization-DIlefinitive Design-Follow-Onl esting

a asmtcrrv

a # r&2~lM~

°a

"THE MANAGIMENT CO11THOL PROGRAM REQUIRED BY NRCIS CALLED TI IE QUJALITY ASSUHANCE PROGRAM

0 UD V L a PI E

- Mlission - The Job To Be Done

a Identification of Data Needs andCorr-elation WiLh Regulatory Criteria and Issues

a Work Definition - lie Science and Engineering Programs

- Test Facility Management

- Conduct of the Techn:ical Work

- The Technical. Management Control Systems

[j~j m I s LAI 0 ND

DATANEES"IDENI IFICAl ION

___ _ _____ ID WFNITION

- -EN ' ' ANAGEMNTCONTRO SYTM CONTROL SYSTES

MHE

E V - A

m I s s I 0 N A c C O M P L I S H M E N T

I

arE oMMmen MasHon

I I JOB.SITE - SPECIFIC | LEVIED O0 = ~ U EACH FIELD OFFICE

"It is the mission of the Basalt Waste Isolation Project to determine the feasibilityof repository sites in the Columbia Hiver Basalts and to provide the technology andfacilities compatible with those sites for the permanent disposal of commerciallygenerated high level radioactive wastes."

THIE OLIMCCU S--

INFEDERALLEGISLATION

III tI&LEAR kI"STE

r.

SECIETAYW POLICYDOEDLT E Of

OFFI- ofCIVILIAN RADIOCATTUE WASTE tANPf3ENT*-

I/PLEENL.ITKW

MIIhEO GE0GIMC DISPOSAL SYS1E11

M-IISSION HEED STATEMENT

MISSION PLA __l_

GfLOG1C tos

Offic of Cmahvic Repoisittiry Dwpluvimat

GENERIC REQUIREMENTSDOClJ141IElITf

for aHinedn Geologic U.ste Oisposa1 Svsten

AOl

ELINE

I

I~

OC /?f t4 EXEC L I ..E [...../.W..~~~............................... ..............

P/R0.Et16T EXErlf,/V- VF V EC f/ON. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......,,,,, ..

0 ~DOE--HLt.. ... . . . . . .rt .H 6 1 I dr

. . .... .. .. .. .. ...... O. . . .. . . . . . .I . .:. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .

......... ............ ,''''.'''...,....,.,..

. . . . . . . . . .', ', " ' . .' . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .'.. .' '. ..; .... .- . . '

IME &WHaNED UnWHON

0C.19um EXECUTAIE DIRECUOAl;---: :...:...; ; :,--: ... :111.11":",:",:",.",:,,:,":'':'I : : ...:...: : 1'.11".""."".",1.1111.11".""."".""."".",.",.",1.111,.1111.11I ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PRI� CT EXECUT111 ................................................. ....

..........STATE G LOCAL . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................

D O E - H L .... .... ... ....... .... ....... .... .. ... .. ... . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .....IM PLEM ENTATION REGULAIORY CRIIERIA. G CODES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..lmm . ... . ... . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

WSALT UASTf ISOLA4NO JEC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PR PROJECT Pt-AN ................................

............ ......... ....................................................... ..

. . . . . . . . . . . .BU IP . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................................................... .. PROJECT "ANAGEIIE-NT ...... ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PLAN .... ... .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . Ii. I , I .1. 1. .1. 1. I ... .1.1. ., . . .1. 1. S ID I . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ......... EM INEFRINQ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IIANAGEM 14T 1:11-M ..... . .. .... ... I.. ... ... . .... .. .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. ...... ............ ................... ....... ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

..... ....................................... ........ ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ' l l . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... ..... .... . . .. . ...... ................................................................................ . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... ...... ..... ..... . .................... I......................... ..... .............. ........ .......................... .... ................... .......... ....

THuE bOfiMfiB UWIDOW

OJCRW EXEcUT/VE 1HIECT/Oi. . . . .... . . ... ., -. s-w.... . . . . . , - - , wt.. . . . . . . . . S.v. . ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . w. ,. . . . . . . , . ,. . . . . ..... --.,.... .,.. .Y'

.......... .. .... ..........PHMECT EXECUTIVE DI/ECB T./t4 ' 'I ' ' ' ' '''''''''''''''i-:.. :- : :: : . ... .........t~:...................... ... .......... ,. zz/ z zzE'': ..: .:: .:..::: .: : '_.. ..................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . z z z

DOE-IlL I . . . . GPISI AlN.IIEPLEIIEf4TATION R - 5IEG"lJAMV UItERIA. £ CODE|.

Ej,........-; , .................... ........ I . ' I DOE-L* s "Executive Summary' of the Project.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...;... .4... Top source document for:E -A AI I~-EIn 1 . . . . . .... - ijission definition and Charter

41 aA t SAMOA;.SAI. .i. . . . . GRil |eneral technical approachST PAOJECI PLAN - Time table and resources

I'iln'd Geic Dijsa1 Syste?1 *... .. _,___ ..

t YiMt H :AM E-iF 77AF ?I4AW t NT fk!AW 4'A t*W&

.::::: .:.::::.:.:::::: PRtOJECT MWAGI~EWINI* ; ..... : .At..... . DOE-AL s "Executive Guidance" source documents.

-..........- Preetinent authority incorporating directives,orders, project docuwents, procedures, etc.

i . :: . ENG.I.I.NG : . 3roject Ilariageaent Plan:.:: ::: . f . .rganizaLion & responsibilities of project

. -I __ ............ participants, Licensing, qO Business mgt... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ............ . Project records mgt, & admin procedures.

.... .. System Engineering flanageuient Plan::. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

. . .. . ... : . :.. Disposal System Definition, Tectilcal

i. ...... Activites tHaster Net, Technical "arnageimenti . . ....... . . .. ... .Systeats(eg, Configuration tianagenent)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ............... ........ .................... ............................ ............. ............... ........

>I z I ... .. ..... m ,.....m.

WOIL[E (U)F 111WINIslr3 MANti>hi[0ll wll ml( 8

DOE -I-L's 'EXECUTIVE GUIDANCE' SOURCE DOC(JMLENT(S):Desiglnates all I Prject alipl iciible directives, orders,

13WIP docimlents, ptncedtires, etc.

IoIlIe &JresponsiiltTIsfa P I-AN

- Hole & responsibilities of each participant.- Establishes* Establishes* Establishes

needs for- Establishes* Establishes* Establishes

licensirg approach.quality assurance prograurm.Project's business managementall participants.Project Directive System.Hiecords Mangernenl Program.need for each rmanagerentet

and administrative procedure.- Prupared bromn nDE-I IC) 51l0tO.4A

= IBUIP

Project ttanagernent

// Lnu~i neer ioux 131!M NG>!BIG JLEEN PP lnltmun lan

L_ _ ___ I * Establishes the System Mission.* Establishes the technical approach.* Establishes Project-wide Activities Master Net

Defines the need, role and characteristics oftechnical management systems; eg:- )ata Needs Identification- Work lDefinition and Integration-- Defines role and minimum characteristics

of Project-wide Change Management Sys.-- Traceability System

Data Base Management-- Technologiy Risk Assessment-- Design Control

MAN amoMAmom

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN(PMP)

SYSTEM ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN(SEMP)

4

1. ORGANIZATION2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

(MANAGEMENT ISSUES)4. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL5. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, DRAWINGS6. DOCUMENT CONTROL7. CONTROL OF PURCHASED ITEMS AND

SERVICES10. INSPECTION15. CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING ITEMS16. CORRECTIVE ACTION17. QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS10. AUDITS

2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM(TECHNICAL ISSUES)

3. DESIGN CONTROL8. IDENrIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS9. CONTROL OF PROCESSES

11. TEST CONTROL12. CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST

EQUIPMENT13. HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING14. INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING

STATUS

i,

C N M II j

* *HUPCHARTER

... .. ... .. . . . . . . ..

....... .. . . ..... .

..... iiwEci PLAN AV:::: o-U IP lf~lfftil;tLi. . .__ T___ o.cra

GulpProjelL 1ageleuit ....~~~taal PImOeLt PlanP12 .

. .. . . . f\ Rt lV__.. _ _ _. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .l. .. . .

.. ......... ...... . . . . . . . . .

MWO OHOI-MWM

HIMESPITRIFE:YARM] 00 F VOYAM NEEM

OC§BR1-f ExcVu/VL V/IVA1CT47w

PI9. . . . . . . ..§. . ../. ..D. . . . . . . . . . . . ..

........ ~I I LA90I(4E EC TIE 1EJUIP. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .....

. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .A. ... .... . *. :..

LI~1P a~.jei~~rycrieri. cdes . UMCIO. . .D. . . . . . SR/PL~ l N ATk1 I ECAMMYffiiffff UdfWDEl. .eq.a.r.v .I.t. . i.se . n...cti..tti...ar .. ..... .. ...... ... . ./..l . . . . . I . . . . . .i .t fe ls[J T .k~ i .N~ . SI .6 . . . .

. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .._.._.._.__.__._

. . . . . . . . . . . .ie. . .(. . .E.A. . .j.i ......f .

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .

nOsn~aronnomifmo ' MM6 HEEOCRXJI EXECUTIVf DMOfCT/

.., ...,..,....,.4 '' -" " '""@ ... ' V.-.- .W 4-7 ,''F''' ... ' 'W''''-' I ... '"'''' $' '"$ 7'" ;' ''"-''..... ................ . . . . . . . . . .

*P*91LAECT £'s'kCU1YI/. DIRECi.......... W.........C.................. ....................... .............. .. .. .. .......... I...................

. .. ..... .................... .............................. T &WA

. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ! t.. . . . . . . . . . . . ....:r- - .:. . . . . . . : . . ; - : : e*.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L IMPLEMENTATIC1N j:: WAl fi~fI,6M

........ .........

DAtl AP RJsTECT PLAN;E . 15 FIJ. fS.~-~~S pl tSiiSSii ~iiiii; * ........

aMwff :l

* Projectas preeminent source document for bona fidetechnical requirements.

- Establishes defensible structure for data needsidentification enabling coqprehensive work definition.

- Establishes structure permitting correlation of allregulatory requirements, issues, state and local codes, eto.

* Establishes site-specifio interpretations, clarifications, ndresolutions of conflicting federal and state regulations.

I

I

.:.-. I logT c t _. * Provides a positive control point for all requirementsj tISSj, L.,,, jBJIP changes.

:..:::.. POJECT NAGEEN Is indespensible as the Projeot's requirements handbook"

::::::::::: :::::: ::::: for all BWIP participants as well as the "clearing house"

...... I. for all requirements changes.. ........ ...... I....::::::;:::: ............ SYSTE11...........- : ............ >ENGINEERI.. . . . . ............ _-........... ............. tlANAGElENT PLA

- Y.. . . . ... . . .. .

......... Y Y >2' 2 - inemd Geologic Di~posal Systa1- ~ :YYY YW~Y~ Xx, coel,

iB ffi r- > o ry cr iia. codes, FUNCTION$S 6 BEQUIRtMUJS '

.T . ...... f. g eneric reiaets, 6 issuesu'slIJ I EN Tr fICA TI(W witht n e s ~ D TA I ~ O A A Y I,. site specific data need DATA NEES ALYSIS 6

AA/fV 5 I o ;&Sy, Xstem-^s Requir/~ ~ 4 W > % fron Syseaisfieiire flt T14 > CORRELATION DOCUMIENTS

> -i .V-.>rW,>n;y./~r-Y yrV -r5 systen analysis

$(V lneedledinformation6 data, Cw r , Xy;Yr8.r t > rr`r 7 YZirr>w^fwvry~rzar~rs

0f000000000000001

STRUCTURE OF SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS TREE

SYSTEMFUNCTIONS

MISSION-DEPENDENT

SYSTEMRE QUIREMENTS

MISSION-RELATEDINfORMATION

NEEDS ANDDATA NEEDS

(UNPRIORITIZED)

Ps84-20O5-8

amM IM[EEC ODNVOwAiram

I I I

System Requirements Tree Process Identifies"Requirement for the Hined Geologic DisposalSystus to Provide Contaiiment

Correlation (in Data Needs Analysis & Correlation Document)with All Regulatory Criteria Establishes HostStringent minima/u^adna Constraints (floor and/or ceiling)

%cm[O)QTIM D& HEEM

SystemRequirements

Tree

correlationmatrix

T"I I I YIr

ob - e s

l0 CFR 60

10 CFR 96 0

correlationmatrix

, . _

I I I I I I I_ - - - - ---. N-

1 I1I1I 1 II

Mission Plan_I Issues qcorrelatlon

Ž tI l I ILI'I%- b-

GENERIC REQUIREMENTS DOCUIMENT

State & localregulations &

codes

otherissues E

i-I- I II Iii I I

Ij_ -I- -

�1-1

iorrelationl atrix

1 11 11 16E ,.,

.

- - II

ll l. .

T-HE SSECWTIAV ADEYIAS/9a SITE-SPEC/F/C- RESOL LITIA

'E4C- FEGLADT/N CONTAINS:lA ffE RP7E JfA TlO61

aF CO/AFL IC

C flU it P

... .... .. ... _

........ ........ _Eng n. .g.... .. _ , , e.... . ...... tny

.~ DO BGA uIP UIARTER.:: ::: . . . . -:':. .... . D(B .OQO .

, ~~PROJECT PLANr I

:r -Y : 'SrW/

. . ... . .. . . . . . . . . .- . .. M:....,. .....

.. I . . .

_Project tlanagement

V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ M AM AIhA3(IU00JEJUR

.System ;i: ~~Engineering < I*.*A..rt~~ bflSw~

. .. 5 anagement Plan| rf usis7 @t X' o9Ul C11 MIS B EN SMAD MIS X0 1 >T yy , r,

"';;;;;';' ' ;;;iiiiiiiiS. . , Y | A c".^. / - ' /t._ 4 . . . . . . . .

a l I pIINED GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL SYSIEH

FLNCTIONS & RE(UIREHENYSDOCU1ENT

IREPOSITORY

DATA NEEDS ANALYSISand

OORRELATIONDOWUtENT

EWOL©oomOF THE

MXESON REQUOMXkEUIbWEHIMON WfEE

~ - .

ENGINEERING STUDIES

SYSTE CONCEPTUZATION

SYSTEHDESIGN REQUIREt1ENTS

DIOCtENT

NCEPTUAL DESIGN

I I I I__-

[ SUBSYSTE"DESIGN REQ' "S

DOCItiENT 11SUBSYSTEMIDESIGN REQ ' hTS

DOcUtENT

SLU3SYSTEIIDESIGN REQ 11TS

DOHEC NT

SUBSYSTEIDESIGN REQhTS

DOCU1ENT

I -

-

-PRELIMINARY DESIGN-

. ~I

COMPONENrDESIGN REQ 'IS

DOCUHENT

ICOMPONENT

DESIGN REQ'MTSDOCNIENT

COHPONIENTDESIGN IREWHIlS

DOCt)ENT

I

DEFINITIVE DESIGN

iiiONS.IJTION and PROWlEM1ENT SPECIFICATIONSi:''-""'i"S-'; '' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' .; . 3 s ; X s ttI;: z i........||X

THE

OWIP. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ... ......

q I TE QWPMClERIZATIO PL

.......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ,

........................................................ ... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * - ''. - --.. - . _ ' . I . . . . . . . . . . .f n l z. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - --. -. . . - . . . . . . * . - - . . . . . . . . . . . . .IN *- -. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *. - -..*. initial release of .. ..-.

..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SC E C K m .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................... --.......................... w...... . ............ ........................................................................................................................ -,l-.......... ........................................................... ... . ................................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ml

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 4 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ru. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ I............... .. ............................................. I... . ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ............................... I... .. .. .. .. .. .......................... ................

Recoacile IdentitrGeoscialce Data Ikedss Site Data

uiJ~ Ieded forolr4 E Planned Investigative Uork Final Conc eulil Design

. .. L . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F. . .

--r y r r -rr .r fi r - r r r . ........... .................................. ....... .........

.k .. . . . .- - . . ... . .Identify

Geolofitct Dat Nes positealy t n t, Y* y ryyyy r4 TA I ;DS

)- )M M' > I T t l T J ? J > ) ' Y Y ~ ~ ~

7 DATA IS AN^LYSIS & _- ~~~. *. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. |wtrttun*~U)............ .. .US.y--5.5. CG R.O .0~iT .EX .:: .... . .;:::. . .:::: ..

I Y> YYs-.wn Aw UKsr, ,Kato IIIEI DCItENINTEERNG

(N~Iajsiar £ fagimamas Iaualar) PlANS P

DAT NED AW YSS . .. . .. ..y~~y~y'y). .... ..... ........ tF d. r~

TM1D

.. . .. . . . . . . .

. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .finalizeI . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .

.. .... I.. _________.. ................21M~4A f 1A ?1 O T~l

T IReconcile ldeni

GeosCience Data Need1s site

On-Going & Planniedlnvestgattive Uork final VM~eLI - nc

DeWines all work necessary to transform identified requirements into

conclusive feasibility reports or an operational subsysteas respectively.l Establishes the work definition for overall management control.

* Provides the control point for changes in Project work scope, acceptabletest, analysis, and modeling methods.

a Establishes the basis for all resource onmfitment, budgets and schedules.a Each is, in effect, a "mint-project plan" for the work area addressed.

BwIPflined Geologic Disposal System

FUMCTIONS £ REQUIREHfllNSDCWIT I

UDATA P.EEDS MtALYSIS &LORRELATIM DOW ENTS

U

nuh EIM finalize

(lopositary 9 regimserad Butlesr)

... . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

DESIGN RAELIRRBEIENIS DOwfUMNr Thfi

ILODEFO HWn~OO

I

System Requirements Tree Process Identifies'Requirement' for the hined Geologic DisposalSystem to Provide Containment

Correlation (in BWIP hGOS Requirements Dooument)with All Regulatory Criteria Establishes tiostiStringent minima/saxima Constraints (floor and/or ceiling)

-500

I 10 5 release rateyrs CONTADNHENT I

_300 yrs containment

lI I I I

Engineering Plan Prescribes Analyses HethodsThat Derive Subsystem Containment Design

"Target" from Performance Allocation

Engineering Plan Presribes Tests and Verification York thatYeilds Substantiated Estimate of Achieved IsolationContainment Time.

:. . . . . . . . . . .,. IM ^ , , .. ,. . .. . . . . . . .

. . .... . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ..

. :::::* DOE-IL uP U wTa.

' - - - - PllOJECT PILAN - o r

U.P HIEW . .............M- -.-

,''- BUTP A

Project Mlanagemert

E : :: _,Engilneering :X : : iu~~ii -,.rA , ^.^^^^^XX~..:lanagement Plan .

v~V'y

En.en ... .... 'X.3y - XX

fly4'. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iiiiiiiiiooa9SfI|Z ttI

OWN=*, VA;4I!S D DEloltltsI

f AI NE,. l EDS IWAN.SIS 6CI ; M1 IEIVS RIIRL1ISIS CO lRlR IIESM

-- -, *, -' ..... . . . . . . ..,, . ., 1" " -.............. * *

E©'Tr D'1OMaUE.

"yyyyyyy wyyryyasrA AM -'y I

liti 1A2W'Sd*Jzr JisPI ~ ~ 'r y

Eli6F~r, r't' r yy S,,y>-^> r 1,tH

c 'r! -Y 7> K"

Y. . . . , . . ,

.. . . . . . -- .. -- :-:- - :-:-:-SWOSYSFEN JSuomiE

FLB _PL: ----,,5St_ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........'

.. . . . . .*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . .................... K A G - :

::::::111 L4 s-'' ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... -PS'::

,,, ,,,,,,,, ... . . . , . . , .. , . . . . . . . .. -. PU .L|

*:-:~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~*MIR :- --:: -- : -: -:::::-::: -::::::::::--- -::: -

OESI7 i LZ 7tEI~kL u nf i

BJWIPSITE aMRAC1RIATIMh FLP

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finalize . . . . . . .

.... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .*.Initial release of

SCIENCETveugaivPLANSL c1. [. . . . . . LN

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LI . . . . .~ ~ • ~ . . . . ._ _ _ _ _ _ _

...... &BEWIU.t.TS... ..... & fi.MWz.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..N. ..L. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .(I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..sis. . . . . .~ rY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .> . . . . . . . . . . ..' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BWIPSIME OibWTEIZATION PUJ'N

..... ... finalize . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . .... . .. . ... . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . ... .... initial r ele ase of. . . . .

...... ..... ...Dat..... ..... ..... ... .. .. .. .. .. SC *IENCE T(T ACLB. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... ork fi. Povde prgr.w atc ite raio.o *nun.ni

*.V

V::IF.{

test work defined as a part of thescience and engineering programs.

...........

..............r .... .. .. .. .. .. ..

urzzk:. . . ....... ...... n........ . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(Iupasiaatp ....................... LA.

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

DA[A NEEDS NJ.LYSIS &C~ifffELAUON IXOt ENTS

CB on r ..... ....... :...... ...........

............ ...........

,D-fI DIP MISOWER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . ... DOCME, i ~~. . . . . . . . . . . ... ..

IP| HE-RLA UIRILCX-

Project flanagement

..... ................. I........Olg

System -- : ICIGSEngineering

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

:- .....n gesnetC P~lanszz.. . . . .......... . .

.. ............ I...... .. YSTI' )r-HI[ '' ' UW,, ils

iP4ECBL ©1T brThDTDwfMlED

DK~wEHMY&Tw k

{Y/ '2r&At.y 7x -

SYtifliV xx

1515 msak"nsrntvfls

Its DO1EDS IIW C Z3JW

lalII , 0ZtlO §(JEII t-Z 1 4

aasaMEma Jkg| &f|f sARDATA iiIOS NMALVS £ DT NEEDS AIUl

eru/Jf it Yo owiIr s I II',Y~,-Y::r r, Y ry J7J E- n r21iD MR|737-.7:I �0 - I �

..:

I-1::. ..-.-

1- ~ SCEUO.- ILI

-KUMS-

.LIII l AP

.~F fig

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .

.. ACr 1 .AEF.Er"..Q . .........tP.. 1..ZTI.

IIE5101S flTI PEUROPIENJ

PUN t.I A[SIC

, 1:* *, :*: .:C' ,Yx z~xYY)"Y)1 # ZZ

N I IXii WI ||IIEiI I TE ST IJJU*TKIIP r.. ....... .--

:;:;:;:;::;:.: ~ ~ S 11tlIf^llt m //

Vf - A P AIIII rums fl

- -_ -- - . ::;.. .. :. 1*. 9SS.pI - - -

, . I . . .I , . I .A.I IS . . 5. S. 5 .5 .1 .

';;:

SmII DEDflnD©nAND

FCOLOTWV NMMVwiE.1v

I At FA.^ E

___L

EXTERNPLTECHNICAL CRITERIA

DOCUNENTS

DIRECTEDWORK METHODS

-- -.J TEST

FACILITYOPERATING PLANS

I

.... ... ..............Do[ATA NEEDS ANALYSIS &.... .. ...............CORRELATION DOCUMENT.......................

System Requirements Treecorrelated with

-Regulatory Criteria & Issues

W.:.WORK DEFINITION:""'DOCUMENTS'.-.

S.Plans)

Testing Stan ards

BWIP+ TECHNICAL

PROCEDURESIIIIA

I I

aHuair OF TE/AO QX

_I

EXTERNAL_ TECHNICAL CRITERIA

_ DOCUMENTS

AUDlrf

VA ~oi~

Il1

I I

I

DIRECTED3RK( METHODS

TESTFACILITY

OPERATING PLANS

-..'.-.--...... .;.......DATA NEEDS ANALYSIS & I

................. ....CORRELATION DOCUMENT......................

System Requirements Tree-correlated uith ..... . .

Regulatory Criteria & Issues

.. , .WIP:.:.'WORK DEFINITION.:-.

D6WUMENTS................ie i r..:(!Science/Enqineerinq ln)

Testing Stan lards I

+ BWIPTECHNICAL

PROCEDURES

DATA ACQUISITIONRECORD REPORTS

4--

MEf ME LW4 AtWMSITIIW AmmXWC ALEWT

m Provide a formal, traceable record of rawdata prior to any analytical modification.

cownuciW (OF UEONNOC

I JA _ DI. OMAR Ir I 1v InITIZ I., .

EXTERNALTECHNICAL CRITERIA

DOCUMENTS

DIRECTEDWORK METHODS

I I II

..............................................DATA NEEDS ANALYSIS &.................. . .

CORRELAT ION DOCUIMENT............ I.........

System Requirements Treecorrelated with

Regulatory Criteria & Issues

.. .

WORK DEFINITION'.DOCUMENTS::

(Scien./Enieering.P..ns.(Science/Engineering Plans)... .. .. .. .. .. .. ........

TESTFACILITY

_ _ OPERATING PLANS

Testing Stan ards I

_BWIPTECHNICAL

_ PROCEDURES

IF

ANALYSESa

ENGINEERING STUDIES

DATA ACOUISITIONRECORD REPORTS

4-

.

CONDC O rCNOC& WSM=oal

EXTERNAL RECEDTESTTECHNICAL CRITERIA WORK METHODS FACILIT

DOCUINENTS _ I _ _ OPERATING PLANS

i.. Testing StanL ardsDATA NEEDS ANALYSIS &

CDRRELATION DOCUMENT WORK DEFINITION BWIP.. R.<.D.F.N.IO........WISystem Requirements Tree DOCUMENTS O.. TECHNICAL

.. .. correlated wit-. (Science/Engineering Plans) PROCEDURESRegulatory Criteria & Issues

REPORTS OF ANALYSES ANALYZES&. A TA ACQUISITION

DESIGN DESCRlIPTIONSus

ENGINEERING STUDIES R'WE:CORD REPORTS.

,

4

TO THE

REOT RU WHOE, 0MIDIMR02

APPLICATIONS

EXTERNAL DIRECTED TESTTECHNICAL CRITERIA WORK METHODS FACILITY

DOCUMNS __OPERATING PLANS

...... .... ,Testing Stan Lards.......................

:DATA NEEDS ANALYSIS & :: BWiP:. :... aw.CORRELATION DOCUMENT .W.RK DEFINITION.IP

:Sstem Requirements Tree . . DOCUMENTS TECHNICALcorrelated with - (Science/En.ineering ians) PROCEDURES

Regulatory Criteria & Issues ... .. _______________ P_.

. ... _..... . . . . . . . . . . . .

REPORTS OF ANALYSES ANALYSES |DATA ACQUSITION L& &

DESIGN DESCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING STUDIES RECORD REPORTS

I

M I S S I O N

Is I S S I 0 N MICScSOM PAL I$ISH M ENT

C Ku tp

. . . .. .. . .

* fl 81. BIP CILTE

. .. .. .. PROJECT PLAN

* Project tioanigement

IW4P~31O4T ngineeringIlanageinent Plan

4.

N01EN&W[HVOF

PMWECU &CUMMWMIM .

VOCUNIENMUDOD8 -I ,

II-- - -- ----- -- -

I

AI1t9A SISIMIIUDII's DO0lI1

ig

Cu"I Su

E11 VA DESUN a

-777 LM~rE~s' 7

i y

'7 7 7 I * 7

Ip'-xxy SYSTEM~*x~y DESIGN R1I1s I ORIENT te4- IESia

-- -- --- E.1

Y;,Y,�

CEOVIENCE0013 WIEDS ANALYSIS S

C01*FIRTION 01MIENT 7y-CERELATUU 00IKOfU b

PLAN

SMRIWNHM

PLAN

PLAN

PRcOJ5[EWl

.110

I- 1 7 r ,?- -7 -1-7

,'x -553��- - y-, - - ?� X: �5-� �I\1,-1- ..... ...

I - -.. - . I . . . . . . . .I -

Jcuil Fr-~PllA s I- LANS -

. . I . . . .

F,-SiMsvIs -

- UMulING -P KAS -

U � U -, I rAVA0rrL1T71

BUII

PEUUR"PI MP N~IBD I*ASSEW~N1* (1 0MaENESP9&JAMN DCS1M £ 0EVLMIEN1

Pt AN PUN~NIk Pt PAI

I A I

(1PSKI WAY~L(N

PLAN

I w0 SlWTEST FACILITIES LICENSING I

IMIGIt111 IUILIIZETU PLANm

Km IhJ--- ---I...... ---- ----------------- -- - - - - - - - -........ :::::

. . . . . . . .U

,ff: //Family ////,a

I NOT Mill

�kwluL I

USTENDWIPTIONS I

WEIAIING PLirS

d-Lf1-I-

@azute k[~ HOE4 FE C rH " E E AHNO QR0( R A m"9)

M n""A QG1E " E Im @v airE 0

* i t~ 98 1m2 ;;A A.

MA NA GA IE N T S YS [E MS

and

DR GA NIZA r'I 0

MS A A CE l.EN T S 'S TEMS

.)1

I M I

I PROJECT UNIQUE

* PROJECT COMPATIBLE

a ORGANIZATIONAL UNQUE

I . . I

I MIs An, IW A - a

Pft:E(XIFT lXQI 1a5 LV-O1tT cLX>VAllTBLE C7A1IML LA

- Critical ParanieterControlled Data Base

* Life Cycle Cost

* AssessmTent of SystemPerformrance

* TeW-i-scal Status ReviewProcess

* Change Managemenit

* Proact Directive System

^ Software Management

* Traceability

• Data Base Mnagemlent

* Trade SIL~dy Methodology

* Decislon-HaWing Melhodolxjy

* Ted-iology Risk Assessment &Cc-rtinjency Ma-agement

* 1iatjIxng Tecnical .Lkertaint,

* Desie Verification & PerformaCtnfirlrlatkin Progrann

* Iec-4o1081 Pioceteilres

* Engineering & Tectnical Standards

* Administrative Proceires

* ADP Equipment

- -

BWIP TACEABLITY lELATIoNS-PS

PURPOSE: 1-0 ESTALISH THOSE AUDIT TRAIL RELATIONSHIPS REQUISITE TO LICEN4SII\)Sa

o Docunent traceability to the requirement for the content of the ctrment

o Docnent traceability to all references made to the document, and vAce versa

o Data traceability to the document contalning the reqirwment for the data

o Data traceability to other significaitly related data

-:-D':: D I

EXTERNAL

TECHNICAL CRITERIA

DOCUMENTS

,. . .. .... . . . . . . . . .. ...... .... ........................ . . .SR/CPR .... i.. ...............

; " fJ ITS ..... ......

DIRECTED

WORK METiOmS

................ .. ........ .........................

Traceable_ I

II

TEST

FACILITY

OPERATIONS PLANS�1�1aceable

Traceable to each Traceable

Traceable 7Traceable

Tr;

............. I................. ....t-GC.BWIP Mm.......... ... ..... .... .. .. . .

REQUIREIPENTS DOCUMENT

(System Requirements Tree)(Data Needs)

. - ~ .I ..

Traceable

to each

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................................: :BWIP::::.::;::::..::::::RKDF"TlN:::::.. :WORK DEFINITON .-

DOC,,, X FNTS. ,.,.",:(Scletice/Engineerln ls)

_ WI ]_ ,

BOPs - I

I I

to eachBW I P

WORK INSTRUCTIONS

A

Traceale

Traceable

KTraceable

-- Traceable -

Traceable to each

.

Traceable

to eact

- Traceable-

IAPPL IC CTI ONS

I

Traceable

LICENSE

&IDESIGN DESCRIPTIONS

II

ANALYSES

R S&ENGINEERING STUDIES

I Traceable

DATA ACQUSITION .-

RECORD REPORTS

(from test & analysis efforts)

Traceable

. -- ......................................_*

GENERAL -PR- R Traceable -- Traceable

Traceable -CONTROLLED to each .DATA BASES

-10[M~o 3DlmI .

- - l w

DATA NEEDS ANALYSIS & DESIGNCORRELATION REPORT / DESCRIPTION

DOCUIMENT

testsIstudies,

analyses I

._ VALIDATED RESULTS

QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION PLAN

M. F. NICOL

0WIPPA841204-I

QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION PLAN FOR FY 1985

PURPOSE

* ENSURE THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM NEEDED FOR SITE CHARACTERIZATIONIS IN PLACE PRIOR TO OCTOBERS 1985 (SHOULD SITE BE NOMINATED)

* ENSURE ALL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ARE DEFINEDAND DOCUMENTED IN A SINGLE SOURCE

- BWIP QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (BQARD)

* ENSURE ALL PROJECT PARTICIPANTS IMPLEMENTING QUALITY ASSURANCEPROGRAMS ADDRESS APPLICABLE PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMREQUIREMENTS

* ENSURE ALL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ARE INTEGRATED INTHE PMP/SEMP

OWIP PAB41 204-2

QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS MATRIX

r

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN(PMP)

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN(SEMP)

I.

1. ORGANIZATION2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

(MANAGEMENT ASPECTS)4. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL5. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, DRAWINGS6. DOCUMENT CONTROL7. CONTROL OF PURCHASED ITEMS AND

SERVICES10. INSPECTION15. CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING ITEMS16. CORRECTIVE ACTION17. QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS18. AUDITS

2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM(TECHNICAL ASPECTS)

3. DESIGN CONTROL8. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS9. CONTROL OF PROCESSES

11. TEST CONTROL12. CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST

EQUIPMENT13. HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING14. INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING

STATUS

BWIPPA841204-3

QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION PLAN APPROACH

* EVALUATE EXISTING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AGAINST NEEDS FOR SITECHARACTERIZATION (10 CFR 50 APPENDIX B, REVIEW PLAN, NQA-1)

* EVALUATE RESULTS OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ROCKWELL AUDITS

* DOCUMENT NEEDED ACTION ITEMS

* ASSIGN ACTION AND SCHEDULE COMPLETION

* THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT OF PLAN

* ISSUE ACTION PLAN

* TRACK STATUS

* THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION

OWIP PA84 1204-4

QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIONPLAN

KEY ACTIVITIES

8WIPPA841204 -5


KEY ACTIVITIES

1. DEFINE PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS IN A SINGLE SOURCEDOCUMENT (BQARD)

* ENSURE INCORPORATION OF ALL FEDERAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS(10 CFR 50 APPENDIX B, NRC REVIEW PLAN, NQA-1)

* PROVIDE A BASIS FOR ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES IN PMP/SEMP

* PROVIDE A BASIS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTSIMPLEMENTING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS

SWIPPA841204-6


KEY ACTIVITIES

2. INTEGRATE PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS INTO PROJECTMANAGEMENT SYSTEM

* ENSURE PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED IN THEPMP/SEMP

* ASSIGN IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE PROJECT QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM AMONG PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

BWIP PA84 1204-7


KEY ACTIVITIES

3. IDENTIFY ITEMS AND ACTIVITIES IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OR WASTE ISOLATION

* ESTABLISH LOGIC FOR DETERMINATION

* COORDINATE APPROACH WITH OTHER OFFICE OF GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES (OGR)PROJECTS

* INTEGRATE INTO PMP/SEMP

* PROVIDE BASIS FOR GRADED APPROACH TOWARD QUALITY ASSURANCEPROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

l PROVIDE BASIS TO EVALUATE USE OF PAST DATA

SWIP PA841204-8


KEY ACTIVITIES

4. CONDUCT INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENTS OF PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCEPROGRAM APPROACH AND IMPLEMENTATION

* CONDUCT INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT AT QUALITY ASSURANCEREQUIREMENTS/IMPLEMENTATION/PLANNING STAGE

* CONDUCT FOLLOW UP ASSESSMENT TO VERIFY IMPLEMENTATION

SWIP PA84 1204-9


KEY ACTIVITIES

5. CONTINUE THE QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATION GROUP AMONG PROJECTPARTICIPANTS

* INITIAL MEETINGS HELD/MEMBERSHIP ESTABLISHED/CHARTER DRAFTED

* MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT QUALITY ASSURANCEPROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AND INTERNAL CONTRACTOR QUALITY ASSURANCEPROGRAMS

* PMP/SEMP APPROACH PRESENTED

* INCLUDES INVOLVEMENT OF LINE MANAGEMENT WHEN APPROPRIATE

A PROVIDES FORUM TO RESOLVE COMMON PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE ISSUES

* DISSEMINATES INFORMATION FROM OGR QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATIONGROUP AND NQA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTE

0WIPPA841204-10


KEY ACTIVITIES

6. COORDINATE, REVISE, AND ISSUE PROJECT PARTICIPANT QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTS(QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AND TECHNICAL)

A. ROCKWELL

* COORDINATE REVIEW AND APPROVE (WHERE RESPONSIBLE) ALL PROJECTPARTICIPANTS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AND TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS ASINTEGRATING CONTRACTOR

* ENSURE INCORPORATION OF PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS/PMP/SEMP IN CONTRACTOR DOCUMENTS

* ISSUE ADDITIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM PROCEDURES IDENTIFIED IN RHO-BWI-MA-1 4

B. ALL PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

• ENSURE INTERNAL PROCEDURES ADDRESS PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCEREQUIREMENTS/PMP/SEMP IMPLEMENTATION

* IDENTIFY AND ISSUE PLANS AND PROCEDURES WHICH REQUIRE PREPARATION ORREVISION

BWIPPA841204-1 1


KEY ACTIVITIES

7. QUALITY ASSURANCE INDOCTRINATION AND JOB SPECIFIC TRAINING

A. ROCKWELL

* ESTABLISH INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING ON PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCEREQUIREMENTS/PMP/SEMP FOR ALL PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

• EXPAND ESTABLISHED JOB SPECIFIC TRAINING PROGRAM

* ISSUE TRAINING PLAN AND MANUAL

* EMPHASIZE QUALITY ASSURANCE PERFORMANCE IN ANNUAL APPRAISALS - IDENTIFYADDITIONAL TRAINING NEEDS/NEED FOR REPLACEMENT

* ESTABLISH QUALITY AWARENESS PROGRAM

* ENSURE PROJECT PARTICIPANTS ESTABLISH JOB SPECIFIC TRAINING

BWIP PA84 1204- 2

- . ., .. .i


KEY ACTIVITIES

7. QUALITY ASSURANCE INDOCTRINATION AND JOB SPECIFIC TRAINING

B. ALL PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

* ESTABLISH TRAINING NEEDS

* PROVIDE JOB SPECIFIC TRAINING PROGRAMS

* EMPHASIZE TECHNICAL ASPECTS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL/QUALITYASSURANCE ASPECTS FOR TECHNICAUPROJECT MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

* DOCUMENT INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING

BWIPPAB41204-13


KEY ACTIVITIES

8. ORGANIZATIONAL UPGRADES

A. ROCKWELL

* REVIEW CHARTERS, CLARIFY ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES

* PROVIDE NEEDED STAFFING LEVELS IN LINE AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATIONS(DETAILED STAFF PLANNING PERFORMED DURING FY 1985 PLANNING)

B. PROJECT

* CLARIFY PROJECT PARTICIPANT RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES IN PMP

SWIP PA841204-14

QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTION PLAN4

KEY ACTIVITIES

9. ENSURE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE VERIFICATION

* ESTABLISH APPROPRIATE VERIFICATION LEVELS AS PART OF GRADED QUALITYASSURANCE APPROACH

* ADJUST ESTABLISHED AUDIT AND SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULES ACCORDINGLY

• ESTABLISH INSPECTION NEEDS OF THE PROJECT (TEST FACILITIES, LABORATORIES, ANDFIELD)

BWIPPA841204-15


KEY ACTIVITIES

10. NONCONFORMANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTING PROCESS

* PROVIDE ADDITIONAL VISIBILITY TO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ROCKWELLSENIOR MANAGEMENT THROUGH REGULAR ASSESSMENT MEETINGS (END FUNCTIONAND PROJECT SUMMARY LEVELS)

* DEFINE AND IMPLEMENT QUALITY TRENDING SYSTEM AND REPORT AT ASSESSMENTMEETINGS

° PROVIDE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF DISPOSITIONAL AUTHORITY (INCLUDINGTHEU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY)

* EXERCISE STOP WORK AUTHORITY SHOULD CONDITIONS SO WARRANT

BWIPPA841204-16


KEY ACTIVITIES

11. EXPAND APPLICATION OF READINESS REVIEW PROCESS

* SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR NEAR-SURFACE TEST FACILITY START UP

* PLANNED APPLICATION FOR EXPLORATORY SHAFT CONSTRUCTION READINESS ANDOPERATIONAL READINESS

• INCREMENTAL APPROACH

OWiPPA841204-17

12/10-11/1984 DOE/NRC Meeting Minutes on the Quality ... · 9:30 a.m. BWIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND...

Documents

Transcript of 12/10-11/1984 DOE/NRC Meeting Minutes on the Quality ... · 9:30 a.m. BWIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND...