11JZ-03Gu

download 11JZ-03Gu

of 6

Transcript of 11JZ-03Gu

  • 8/10/2019 11JZ-03Gu

    1/6

    On the Numerical Simulation of a Piston-type Wavemaker

    H.B. Gu1,2, D.M. Causon1, C.G Mingham1, L. Qian1, Han-Bao. Chen2

    1 Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis

    School of Computing, Mathematics and Digital Technology

    The Manchester Metropolitan University,

    Manchester, UK

    2 Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transportation Engineering,

    Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment of Ministry Communications,

    Tianjin, China

    ABSTRACT

    The piston-type wavemaker is a very popular and important piece of

    equipment in coastal and ocean engineering physical wave modelexperiments so in this paper we use a numerical model to simulate the

    characteristics of the piston-type wavemaker. The numerical model is

    based on solving the Navier-Stokes equations, in which a two-fluidwater and air system is adopted. The interface between the water and

    air is tracked by a particle level set method and the partial cell

    technique combined with the local relatively stationary method is used

    to simulate the motion of the wavemaker in the numerical model.Firstly, linear wave maker theory is implemented and tested for regular

    waves at various water depths, wave periods and wave heights, to see

    which wave making methods give reasonable results for short wave

    cases. The method is then extended to simulate irregular waves where

    the wave spectrum is specified and the individual wave components aresuperimposed. The output spectrum from a wave gauge in thenumerical flume compared well with the target spectrum. Finally a

    focused wave is simulated by the numerical model and compared with

    published results. It is shown that the numerical flume can simulate an

    experimental flume with a piston-type wavemaker and thus physicaltests can be accurately replicated by numerical modelling.

    KEY WORDS: Wavemaker; regular wave; irregular wave; focusedwave; level set; partial cell; local relatively stationary method.

    INTRODUCTION

    Wavemakers are important pieces of equipment in coastal and oceanengineering laboratory experiments to study wave interaction with

    structures such as wharves, breakwaters and any other near-shore or

    ocean structures. Generation of waves is one of the most significanttasks in this kind of laboratory.

    The most common way in a physical experimental flume to generate

    waves is through the movement of a paddle, which is located at one endof the flume. Paddles used in flumes can be a flap, a piston or a wedge

    type, of which the piston-type is the most popular permitting simple

    generation of shallow water waves according to the velocity pattern

    near the paddle.

    Havelock (1929) derived an analytical solution for waves generated bypiston and flap wavemakers based on linear wave theory. Ursell et al .

    (1960) and Flick and Guza (1980) experimentally verified a pistonwavemaker by using first order wavemaker theory. Ottesen-Hansen et

    al. (1980), Sand (1982) and Sand and Donslund (1985) discussed

    second-order effects such as long waves in experimental models.

    Schaffer (1996) derived a complete mathematical model for pistonwavemakers to second order. The linear wavemaker theory has been

    extended to a 3D wave basin (Liu 1994, 1996; Newman 2010). In the

    implementation of wave making in the laboratory active absorption is

    often applied to avoid spurious reflection (Spinneken and Swan 2009a,2009b).

    Because the size of experimental models is limited by the size of wave

    tanks leading to scaling effect errors, numerical wave flumes began to

    be considered as a possible tool to support the design and regulation of

    costal, ocean and near shore structures. Numerical wave models basedon nonlinear shallow water equations (SWE) can be found in Van Gent

    (1994), and Hu et al. (2000). Zhang (2005) built a numerical model

    based on the Boussinesq equations and compared numerically

    generated waves to physical results. As models based on the previous

    methods do not show the detailed information in the vertical direction

    advanced numerical wave flumes should be based on the Navier-Stokesequations (NSE).

    The main challenge in solving NSE for wave generation is how to

    locate the free surface. There are two approaches for solving the NSE:

    mesh based methods and meshless methods. Meshless methods include

    the smoothed particle hydrodynamic (SPH) and moving particle semi-

    implicit (MPS) methods. Shao et al. (2006) presented an

    incompressible SPH model to investigate wave overtopping in coastalstructures. Koshizuka et al. (1995) proposed the MPS method to solve

    the NSE used for the simulation of numerical wave flumes.

    Mesh based methods include the volume of fluid (VOF) method (Hirt& Nichols 1981, Yongs 1982, Ubbink 1997), the level set method (Gu

    et al.2009, 2010; Chen 2009) and the marker and cell method (MAC)(Harlow & Welch 1965) to capture or track the free surface together

    with a NSE solver such as the projection or SIMPLE method. Another

    652

    Proceedings of the Twenty-fir st (2011) In ternational Of fshore and Polar Engineeri ng Conference

    Maui, Hawaii, USA, June 19-24, 2011

    Copyri ght 2011 by the International Society of Of fshore and Polar Engineers (I SOPE)

    ISBN 978-1-880653-96-8 (Set); ISSN 1098-6189 (Set); www.isope.org

  • 8/10/2019 11JZ-03Gu

    2/6

  • 8/10/2019 11JZ-03Gu

    3/6

  • 8/10/2019 11JZ-03Gu

    4/6

  • 8/10/2019 11JZ-03Gu

    5/6

    0

    0.00005

    0.0001

    0.00015

    0.0002

    0.00025

    0.0003

    0.00035

    0.0004

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    frequency f

    spectrum

    density

    Targeted

    Simulated

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    time (s)

    eta

    (m)

    is a little smaller than the target value. Based on the wave history a new

    spectrum can be estimated by autocorrelation analysis, which is calledthe measured wave spectrum shown in Figure 4 in a black solid line.

    Comparing the measured and target spectra, the peak frequency and

    spectral shape are very close to each other. The estimated spectrum hassome oscillations around the peak frequency. These may be caused by

    numerical errors in the simulation and the discretisation of the targetwave spectrum. However errors are small and so the numerical model

    can be used to simulate irregular waves.

    Figure 4: Wave spectrum targeted and estimated

    Focused waves

    The mechanism of wave focusing in two dimensions is related to wavedispersion. When rapidly travelling long waves catch up with slowly

    travelling short waves, a large amplitude wave can appear at some fixed

    location or time due to the superposition of wave components. Then anextreme wave is expressed as

    ))(2)(cos(),(1

    pipi

    N

    ii ttfxxkatx

    f

    ==

    (25)

    where xp and tp are focus position and time respectively, Nf is thenumber of wave components with frequency fi and amplitude ai andwave number k

    i. The number of wave components is chosen as 50 to

    approximate a continuous wave spectrum. Wave components are equi-

    spaced across a bandwidth of dfand centered at frequencyfc. The wavedensity distribution is calculated by the modified JONSWAPspectrum (Goda, 1999).

    Figure 5: Irregular wave time history

    In this section, we use the numerical piston wavemaker to simulate thefocused waves in tests cases conducted by Zhao and Hu (2010). The

    schematic of the setup is similar to that of Figure 1. The length of the

    flume is 20m, with water depth of 0.4m. The focusing position is set at

    5m away from the wave paddle and the focusing time is 10s.Computations are conducted with two different frequency bandwidth df

    =0.3 and 0.9 with the peak frequency fc= 0.83. The focusing amplitudeA,which represents the linear sum of the component wave amplitudes(A= ai), is set to 0.06m by adjusting input significant wave height.The simulation ran for 20s.

    A wave gauge is set at the target focus position to record the wave

    profiles. Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the free surface elevation with

    frequency bandwidths 0.3 and 0.9 respectively. Wave profiles are

    similar to results from Zhao and Hu (2010). Comparing Figure 6 toFigure 7, the frequency bandwidth has an effect on focused wave

    profiles. The wider frequency bandwidth case gives a more clearlydefined extreme wave. Therefore the wave frequency bandwidth should

    be carefully selected in practical application.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Linear wavemaker theory is implemented in the numerical model. Themodel is based on solving the NSE and using a level set method to

    track the water free surface in conjunction with the partial cell method

    combined with the local relatively stationary method to simulate themotion of the wavemaker. A piston-type wavemaker is used to generateregular waves, irregular waves and focused waves. It is shown that

    linear wavemaker theory is suited to simulate short wavelength regular

    waves and can also be used to approximate irregular waves and focused

    waves. For more accurate wave simulation high order wavemakertheory will be tested in the future.

    -1.2

    -0.8

    -0.4

    0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    time (s)

    eta/A

    Figure 6: Focused wave with df= 0.3,A=0.06m

    -1.2

    -0.8

    -0.4

    0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    time (s)

    eta/A

    Figure 7: Focused wave with df= 0.9,A=0.06m

    REFERENCES

    Chen Y.G. Price W.G. (2009) "Numerical simulation of liquid sloshing

    in a partially filled container with inclusion of compressibility effects,

    "Physics of fluids,Vol 21Enright D., Fedkiw R., Ferziger J., Mitchell I. (2002) "A Hybrid

    Particle Level Set Method for Improved Interface Capturing,"Journal of Computational Physics183, 83-116

    Enright D, Losasso F, Fedkiw R. (2005) "A fast and accurate semi-

    656

  • 8/10/2019 11JZ-03Gu

    6/6

    Lagrangian particle level set method, " Computers & Structures83,479-490.

    Flick R.E., Guza R.T. (1980) "Paddle generated waves in laboratorychannels, "Journal of Waterway, port,coastal and ocean engineering,American society of civil engineers, 106(1), 79-97.

    Gao F., Ingram D.M., Causon D.M., Mingham C.G. (2007) "The

    development of a Cartesian cut cell method for incompressible viscousflows, "Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids54, 1033-1053.

    Goda Y. (1999) "A corporative review on the functional forms ofdirectional wave spectrum,"Coastal engineering 41(1), 1-20.

    Gu H.B., Causon D.M., Mingham C.G. & Qian L. (2009) "A Fast-

    Marching Semi-Lagrangian Level Set Method for Free Surface flows," ISOPE-2009

    Gu H.B., Causon D.M., Mingham C.G. & Qian L. (2010) "High

    Resolution Computation of Free Surface Flows Using a Level Set

    Approach,"ISOPE-2010Harlow F, Welch J. (1965) "Numerical calculation of time-dependent

    viscous incompressible flow, "Phys of Fluids 8, 2182-2189.Havelock T.H. (1929) "Forced surface-wave on water," Philosophical

    Magzine, 8(7), 569-576.Hirt C.W., Nichols B.D. (1981) "Volume of fluid (VOF) method for

    dynamics of free boundaries,"J. Comput. Phys39, 201-225Hu K., Mingham C.G., Causon D.M. (2000) "Numerical simulation of

    wave overtopping of coastal structures using the non-linear shallowwater equations,"Coastal engineering 41(4), 433-465.

    Kelecy F.J., Pletcher R.H. (1997) "The development of a free surfacecapturing approach for multidimensional free surface flows in closed

    containers,"Journal of computational physics,138, 939-980Koshizuka S., Tamako H., Oka Y. (1995) "A particle method for

    imcompressible viscous flow with fluid fragmentation,"Computational fluid dynamics journal 4, 29-46.

    Lin P. (2007) "A fixed-grid model for simulation of a moving body in

    free surface flows," Computers & fluidsl 36, 549-561Lin P., Liu P.L.F. (1998) "A Numerical Study of Breaking Waves in the

    Surf Zone,"J. Fluid Mech.359, 239-264.Liu S. (1994) "The method and properties of waves generated by

    serpent-type wavemakers," The ocean engineering 12(1), 81-93.Liu S. (1996) "Extension of the effective test area of multi-directional

    waves by side wall reflections,"The ocean engineering 14(2), 40-50.Newman J.N. (2010) "Analysis of wave generators and absorbers in

    basins,"Applied ocean research 32, 71-82.

    Ottesen-Hansen N.E., Sand S.E., Lundgren, H., Sorensen T., GravesenH. (1980) "Correct reproduction of long group induced waves,"Proceedings of the 17th coastal engineering conference, Sydney,Australia,784-800.

    Pan D., Chang C.H. (2000) "The capture of free surface inincompressible multi-fluid flows,"Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 33, 203-222

    Qian L., Causon D.M., Ingram D.M. & Mingham C.G. (2003) "ACartesian cut cell two-fluid solver for hydraulic flow problems,"

    ASCE Journal of hydraulic engineering 129 (9), 688-696Qian L., Causon D.M., Mingham C.G. & Ingram D.M. (2006) "A free-

    surface capturing method for two fluid flows with moving bodies,"Proc. R. Soc. A, 462, 21-42.

    Sand S.E. (1982) "Long wave problems in laboratory models," Journalof Waterway, port,coastal and ocean engineering,108(WW4), 492-503.

    Sand S.E., Donslund B. (1985) "Influence of the wave board type onbounded long waves,"Journal of hydraulic research23, 147-163.

    Schaffer H.A. (1996) "Second-order wavemaker theory for irregular

    waves,"Ocean engineering 23, 47-88.Sethian J. (1998) "Fast marching methods," Dept. of mathematics,

    University of California, Berkeley.Shao S., Ji C., Graham D.I., Reeve D.E., James P.W., Chadwick A.J.

    (2006) "Simulation of wave overtopping by an incompressible SPH

    model," Coastal engineering 53(9), 723-735.Spinneken J, Swan C. (2009a) "Second-order wave maker theory using

    force-feedback control. Part I: A new theory for regular wave

    generation,"Ocean engineering 36, 539-548.Spinneken J, Swan C. (2009b) "Second-order wave maker theory using

    force-feedback control. Part II: An experimental verification ofregular wave generation,"Ocean engineering 36, 549-555.

    Ubbink O. (1997) "Numerical prediction of two fluid systems withsharp interfaces," Thesis, Department of mechanical engineering,Imperial college of science, technology & medicine Jannuary

    Ursell F., Dean R.G., Yu Y.S. (1960) "Forced small amplitude waterwaves: Comparation of theory and experiment," Journal of fluidmechanics, 7(1), 32-53.

    Van Gent M.R.A. (1994) "The modeling of wave action on and in

    coastal structures,"Coastal engineering 22(3-4), 311-339.Yang J., Stern F. (2009) "Sharp interface immersed-boundary/level set

    method for wave-body interactions," Journal of ComputationalPhysics 228, 6590-6616

    Yu Y. (2000) "Random wave and its applications for engineering,"Dalian university and technology press, pp 67-68.

    Zhang H. (2005) "A deterministic combination of numerical andphysical models for coastal waves," PhD thesis, Department ofmechanical engineering, Technical university of Denmark.

    Zhao X., Hu C. (2010) "Numerical simulation of focused wave

    generation using CIP method," Proc 20th Intl Ocean and Polar Eng

    Conf, Beijing, China, ISOPE,Vol 3,pp596-603.

    657