11-09-20 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel – Request...

8/4/2019 11-09-20 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel Request for Clarification re

1/13

Human Rights Alert (NGO) Joseph Zernik, PhD " PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313, Israel; [email protected] ; 91313 ,31440"

11-09-20 Zernik v State of Israel(6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of

Israel Request for Clarification re Validity of the September 7, 2011Judgment (Eng + Heb)

Attached:

# Record Page #

1 Zernik v State of Israel(6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel Request for Clarification re Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment as filed(Hebrew)

2

2 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) Sept 20, 2011 Request for Clarification (English) 12

Brief Chronology:

1) The Appeal originated in the case of Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11), and

pertained to denial of request for clarification by the Clerk of the Court relativeto validity of certain records in the case.

2) The September 7, 2011 Judgment in the Appeal was served on the Appellant (DrZernik) unsigned. (Exhibit 2)

3) In contrast, another the September 5, 2011 Decision in the case ofKatzav v State

of Israel was served on the same week on Dr Zernik signed, stamped with theseal of the court, and also stamped Approved for service with hand signature

from the Office of the Clerk. (Exhibit 1)

4) In other cases, decisions of the Court, which appeared (unsigned and

unstamped) in the online public access system, were not served at all on DrZernik.

5) Therefore, request was filed on September 20, 2011, for clarification regardingthe validity of September 7, 2011 Judgment.

6) No ruling was received on the September 20, 2011 Request.7) Request, later filed, for a certified copy of the September 7, 2011 Judgment, was also

never ruled upon, and no signed and certified copy of the September 7, 2011 Judgment

was ever received.

In conclusion: A reasonable person is likely to conclude that the September 7, 2011 Judgment

was and is a simulated decision, or at best a vague and ambiguous court record.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


2/13


3/13

2/5

.-,))/113372,,2011-5"":1-,))/116041,,2011-7"":2

.

,,2011:20

_____________________"91313,31440"

:[email protected]

_____________


4/13

1


5/13


6/13


7/13

2


8/13


9/13


10/13

6041/11"

:,",

,-7''

,,,2011

:,,

",":-,10

:057.936.9945:03.686.9775

:91010,29-

:02.646.6664

:

"- :02.675.9632:02.675.9648

,,2011-20:

____________________"91313,31440"

:[email protected]


11/13


12/13

[digital signature - jz]

In the Supreme Court in Jerusalem

6041/11

Dr Joseph Zernik

V

State of Israel

Request for Clarification by the Honorable Justice S Jubran, Regarding Validity of

the September 7, 2011 Judgment in Instant Case, and for Due Service of a Signed

Decision on Instant Request

To the Honorable Court and the Parties in the case:

The Appellant herein files a Request for Clarification by the Honorable Justice S Jubran,

Regarding Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment in Instant Case, and for Due

Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request.

I. Request for Clarification by the Honorable Justice S Jubran, Regarding

Validity of the September 7, 2011 Judgment in Instant Case

1. Purpose and Justification of the Request:

In recent days, two records of the Supreme Court have appeared in two cases:a) The September 5, 2011 Decision under Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11). The

record was received by mail signed and stamped Exhibit 1.

b) The September 7, 2011 Judgment underZernik v State of Israel (6041/11). Therecord was received by mail unsigned and stamped Exhibit 2.

In other cases, decisions of the Supreme Court have not been received at all, but appeared

in the online public access system, unsigned and unstamped.

The Appellant claims that any reasonable person would conclude, after review of the

records and other facts in this matter, that it is unreasonable that these two records hold

the same validity.

Therefore, the undersigned asks that the Honorable Justice S Jubran clarify, whether the

September 7, 2011 Judgment is a valid judgment of the Supreme Court of the State ofIsrael, pursuant to the law of the State of Israel.

II. Request for Due Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request

2. Purpose and Justification of the Request:

The Appellant has previously received an unsigned and uncertified copy of the Judgment

in instant case. Likewise, the Judgment was published online unsigned and uncertified.Therefore, the Appellant asks that the Supreme Court duly serve on him a signed and

certified copy of the decision on instant Request at the address below.

The Supreme Court

UNREPRESENTED PARTIES DIVISION

September 20, 2011

RECEIVED/INSPECTED

Signature: ___[signature jz]_

III. Exhibits


13/13

Exhibit 1 - The September 5, 2011 Decision under Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11),as received by mail, signed and stamped.

Exhibit 2 - The September 7, 2011 Judgment underZernik v State of Israel (6041/11),as received by mail, unsigned and stamped

Dated: September 20, 2011[signature jz]

_________________

Dr Joseph ZernikPO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313

Tel: 052-5083014

[email protected]

11-09-20 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel – Request...

Documents

Transcript of 11-09-20 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel – Request...