10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI,...
-
Upload
shannon-young -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI,...
![Page 1: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall
Jarmo Koistinen
FMI, FinlandIPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall,
Madison, October 2005
![Page 2: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Most of Finland belongs to boreal forest climate: • 100-220 snow cover days/year• Average snow depth in March 20-90 cm
![Page 3: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
10/30/03 1
FMI weather radar network
8 C-band Dopplers
Polar V, dBZ (dBT,W) archived since 2000
Data availability 99.3 %incl. maintenance and telecommunicationsin 2004
![Page 4: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Global CEOP* validation site (Nr 29)*Coordinated Enhanced Observing Period (CEOP)
Potential GV site for snow Sodankylä (the northernmost radar, 67°N)
![Page 5: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Helsinki Testbed (HTB), 60°N, 2005-2007-?A coastal, mesoscale high latitude research and development facility (WMO/WWRP endorsement tbd).
testbed
46 FMI weather stations34 FMI precipitation stations5 new weighing gauges
13 off-line temperature loggers10 Weather transmitters in urban area
191 Road weather stations299 Surface weather stations, total42 Instrumented towers (telecommuni-
cation masts) with weather trans-mitterson 2 or 3 levels each
3 Mobile ship weather stations5 Optical backscatter profilers
(ceilometers)4 Doppler radars1 Dual-polarization Doppler radar3 RAOB sounding stations1 Wind profiler with RASS
All other stations shown except Road Weather.
Average WS distance 9 km (FMI regular 50 km).
1 IC lightning system + CG lightning system
![Page 6: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
10/30/03 1
HTB Precipitation Measurements
-circles: radar 20-60km (0-250 km)-dot: manual obs-big diamond: FD12P-small diamond: potential FD12P-triangle: autom snow depth-square: weighing gauge- plan: 2 POSS to be implemented
http://testbed.fmi.fi public realtime data during the campaigns (6 monthsduring Aug 2005 – Aug 2006, snow: Nov, Jan-Feb)
![Page 7: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Vaisala polarimetric radar at HTB, prototype resultsRHI scans across a bright band
dBZ ρHV LDR
![Page 8: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
10/30/03 1
NORDRAD-composite (25 radars, operational)
![Page 9: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
10/30/03 1
WCRP/GEWEX/BALTEX: WCRP/GEWEX/BALTEX: DBZC - Composites of DBZC - Composites of radar reflectivityradar reflectivity
●More than 30 radars in 11 countries: BALTRAD
● Radar Data Centre at SMHI, Sweden (Daniel Michelson)● Continuous operation since October 1, 1999●Resolutions: 22 km, 15 minutes, 0.4 dBZ
BALTRAD composite2005-05-28 14:15 UTC
BALTEX Radar Data Center
![Page 10: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10/30/03 1
RR - 3 and 12-hour RR - 3 and 12-hour Gauge-adjusted Gauge-adjusted
Accumulated Accumulated Precipitation +Precipitation +Gauges-only Gauges-only AccumulationAccumulation
●22 km horizontal resolution● Every 3 and 12 hours● 32-bit depth● Wind corrected gauge observations● 3-hour BALTRAD area● 12-hour BALTEX Region (see example)
![Page 11: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Eumetnet OPERA Programme:“The aim of OPERA is to harmonize European radar data and products,
raise their qualities, facilitate their exchange, and support their application”
• Opera runs projects on– Quality information– Radar data use– New technologies– Products to exchange– New data formats– BUFR software– Radar data hub
![Page 12: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
10/30/03 1
European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST)
![Page 13: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
10/30/03 1
EUMETSAT: Hydrology SAF
• SAF = Satellite Application Facility under EUMETSAT contract
• HSAF lead by Servizio Meteorologico dell’Aeronautica, Italy
• Hydrology SAF
– Precipitation (Italy)
– Soil Moisture (Austria)
– Snow parameters (Finland)
• Mainly EUMETSAT operational satellites, but also other (research) satellites are used, when applicable
Development work for improved precipitatio
n data quality
Routine production
of precipitation data for systematic
value assessment
Development work for improved snow data
quality
Routine production
of snow data for
systematic value
assessment
Development work for improved
soil moisture
data quality
Routine production
of soil moisture data for
systematic value
assessment
Development work for improved
data assimilation
schemes
Space-time continuisati
on for gridded data at
specified times by
assimilationMeasured
precipitation
Computed
precipitation
Computed soil
moisture
Computed snow
parameters
Measured soil
moisture
Measured snow
parameters
Assessment programme to evaluate the benefit of satellite-derived precipitation, soil moisture
and snow information in European hydrology and water resource managementFig. 01 – Logic of the H-SAF Development phase.
![Page 14: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Hydrology SAF
Products
• Snow recognition (SR)
• Snow effective coverage (SCA)
• Snow status (wet or dry)
• Snow Water Equivalent(SWE)
Satellites/instruments during development:
NOAA(AVHRR)
+ MetOp (AVHRR, ASCAT)
+Meteosat(SEVIRI)
+EOS-Terra/Aqua
(MODIS)+
DMSP(SSM/I, SSMIS)
+EOS-Aqua (AMSR-E)
+QuickSCAT(SeaWinds)
Satellites/instrumentsduring operations:
MetOp(AVHRR,ASCAT)
+Meteosat(SEVIRI)
+NPOESS
(VIIRS, CMIS)+
MW radiometersof the GPMconstellation
![Page 15: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Growth of uncertainties in the Ground Reference process of snowfall at ground
GPM estimates
Radar estimates SFWE(Ze)
In situ estimates (SFWE)gauges, POSS etc
Real snowfall at ground including density
GV main tasks
Major sources of error are hiding
here
Rarely available
Calibrations
Wind correction
WMO inter-comparison
![Page 16: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Work to improve quality(implemented)
Absolute calibration is still an issue (at best 1-3 dB):
• A relative calibration method based on comparing precipitation accumulation in the overlapping area of radar pairs.
• Elevation angle calibration to better than 0.05 degrees (high latitude sun hits the operational scans densely during rise and set).
Cold climate phenomena diagnosed applying pattern recognition and fuzzy logics (in future applying polarimetry):
• Anomalous propagation common introducing strong sea and ship clutter.
• Migration of birds and insects.
![Page 17: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Better accuracy with integrated data:
• Hydrometeor phase analysis (rain, sleet, snow) based on Kriging-analysis of SYNOP data (T,RH). Resolution 5 min & 1 km (extrapolation).
• Time-space variable Z – R / Ze – S relations.
Operational since 1999:
Grey background: snowBlue background: rainPink background: mixed
![Page 18: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
10/30/03 1
But R(Z)-S(ZBut R(Z)-S(Zee) relations play only a minor role) relations play only a minor role
Gauge/Radar
3000 gauge/radar winter comparisons● Variable-phase (R or S)
method in solid line
● Z-R only in dashed line
● Snow cases in orange, all cases in grey
● Correct Z-R or Z-S is negligible compared to the increasing bias as a function of range due to the vertical profile of reflectivity!Range
![Page 19: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Examples of measured reflectivity profiles
Snow Snow,melting close to ground
![Page 20: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
10/30/03 1
1(2)
Overhanging snow (virga, Altostratus)
Snow, evaporation andresidual clutter
![Page 21: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
10/30/03 1
1(2)
Automatic real time classification of VPRs based on radar and NWP data (556 471 profiles)
VPR. type (at ground):
![Page 22: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Snowfall measurements require 20 dBs more sensitivity than those of rainfall
MDS of GPM
Cumulative probability distribution of snowfall in 106 825 profiles (range 2-40 km)
![Page 23: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Climatological profiles based on the measured 220 000 precipitation profiles
![Page 24: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
10/30/03 1
1(2)
Vertical profiles of reflectivity (VPR) in winter introduce large biases (S) in the radar estimates of surface precipitation
),(
),0(log10
rhZ
rZS
e
e
![Page 25: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Example: A Snow Case
1(2)
Profile correction for 500 m PsCAPPI
![Page 26: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
10/30/03 1
1(2)
Yearly average ground reference bias for 500 m PsCAPPI as a function of range
In snowfall sample size 106 000 VPRs
![Page 27: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
10/30/03 1
1(2)
24 h accumulated precipitation Nov 7, 2002, 14 UTC Measured Corrected to ground level
Improving reference data applying a spatially continuous VPR correction
![Page 28: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Log(Gauge/Radar), note excellent VPR-effect
![Page 29: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Remaining problem: complete beam overshooting in very shallow snowfall.
![Page 30: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
10/30/03 1
1(2)
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
Height (m)
%GPM Blind Zone may mask shallow precipitation
Case: Precipitation top height March 2001 (snow). Note: 0.3-1 km high snowfall regular in Finland (difficult to diagnose from VPRs).
Notknown
![Page 31: 10/30/031 Northern European Possibilities for Ground Validation of Snowfall Jarmo Koistinen FMI, Finland IPWG/GPM/GRP Workshop on Snowfall, Madison, October.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062518/56649e985503460f94b9b3c1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
10/30/03 1
Better accuracy with integrated data – but in proper order!
1. Remove non-meteorological echoes and OP.
2. Attenuation correction (sleet!).
3. Blocking- & VPR-correction & intelligent compositing => Precipitation at ground
4. Time-space variable R(Z) / S(Ze) relations.
5. Diagnose areas of total beam overshooting and POD of snowfall detection.
6. Gauge-radar adjustment.