10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) •...

19
10/2/2015 o Radiological Dispersal Device & Nuclear Detonation EXPLOSION AND BLAST INJURIES S Possible Scenarios Radiological Exposure Device Improvised nuclear device (IND) Nuclear weapon detonation Nuclear power plant accident Radioactive dispersal device (RDD) including the "Dirty Bomb" scenario D Photo Credit Sandia National Laboratories and Wikipedia 1

Transcript of 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) •...

Page 1: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

o

Radiological Dispersal Device &Nuclear DetonationEXPLOSION AND BLASTINJURIES

S

Possible Scenarios

• Radiological Exposure Device• Improvised nuclear device (IND)• Nuclear weapon detonation• Nuclear power plant accident• Radioactive dispersal device (RDD)

including the "Dirty Bomb" scenario DPhoto Credit Sandia National Laboratories and Wikipedia

1

boverall
Placed Image
Page 2: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

“Dirty Bomb”

• Conventional explosive + radioactivematerial =“dirty bomb”

• Dispersal pattern variable• Combined blast and burn injuries• External and internal contamination• Potentially large population affected

Conventional

Gff'r* imj

if

Theo Van Kirk

rtrm target

*3■

Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima Min August 6 1945

Simulation Target

T- -i or,i *1....., TrifcvN - -.....ill L„r/l

“ — © ®

\i K"~"sc -1 •• c;;:? --«5 •=£ÿ I I ----i. zr pe •, — - i~~ *».

“Tr.V"sM1 ~— g

Hypothetical Scenario in Downtown, Atlanta

2

boverall
Placed Image
Page 3: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Severe damage zone (0,5 mile radius!• Near complete collapse• Few, if any. buildings still standing• 99% immediate fatalities

U/1M j; .V- :1 .• ; • 1 ! ‘

' <3 : i-i ij v\\*‘-'/i **> '

‘r:.l , 03 '

\ «&»

+»« *;3,'©•f l -<•“ 1

■r*».-* §©e

-e © i,— !•• •

-“ÿ/ i s\ r ->s.! .rr— »:

Ol-'I i ---f:*.rrB j ;!—niT-V-iS-f e

:T 1 «•J— -— 1-= -- ! I-

Moderate damage /one (1 mile radius):■ Some collapsed buildings, blown out building

interiors, overturned automobiles, fires .« Ut— Uijc.

�*- ~;;s£Significant thermal burns if outdoors38% immediate fatalities, 14% expectant

: 'AN . i•*ÿ>, r i

i « :::!!mJZZ* •:"v*-r|

e8sJ I\ ®

j ©ST6* *f r"•/j~r-m> • -\ \J-err ....* . ...r s

.i e J

r-lT.V-i. } I—i L“ O'V»**H ttj, >«M

i-I J— - tsr— 1-5:

Light damage zone:• 2-3 mile radius• 25% of windows are shattered• Huge numbers of glass injuries• 6% of casualties at risk of death

C-: ■> ‘r Aci-

i'i\ *

/»tSf /r; \

_i ' —Jk- -

>\00 Medical

CentersiS'SW •ÿA0

a: r/{=•

/ ©

o Sf “

s /s p ©>*«t». *S a

'’TT *|o i

’ 5 tne““ -~i ‘S' e / Level I Trauma

Temporary blindness 5-10 miles away!

3

boverall
Placed Image
Page 4: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Dangerous Fallout Zone or DangerousRadiation Zone:• Extends 25 miles downwind of ground

zero• Readies maximum extent at 1 hr• Severely hazardous fallout will

descend to the ground within a fewhours and may shrink to a few miles ina couple of days (decay)

• Mostly visible to naked eye (grains ofsand)

• Exposure rale >10 R/h

V, V_

bjr-' 41;

h.

&!N'' l\ '

l

NCRP 165 Page 53

Casualties (10 kT model)

• For large city with 2 million population- 230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured survivors

• 99.000 will succumb without medical treatment• 73.000 will still succumb with medical treatment• 26,000 can be saved with medieal treatment

Acute Injuries after a NuclearDetonation

• Blast injuries- Blast wave can lake several seconds lo travel a few

milesGlass injuries (within a few miles)Duck and Cov er can protect people if they see thebright Hash of light (can be seen up to 100 miles away )

• May nol be possible in a ground burst inside a citv

• Thermal bums injuriesPrimary flame (fireball up to few miles away)Secondary fires

4

boverall
Placed Image
Page 5: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Acute Injuries after a NuclearDetonation

• Radiation injuries- Prompt radiation (within first minute)

- Latent (after first minute)• Emitted from the fallout

- Composed of fission products and neutron activationproducts

- Acute Radiation Syndrome- Beta bums

Acute Injuries after a NuclearDetonation

• Combined injuries (estimated to occur in60%)

• Flash blindness ( up to 6 miles)• Electromagnetic pulse (EMP)

- No direct health effects- High voltage surge in conductors- Poorly characterized in an FND- Probably not beyond 2 miles of ground zero

15Ground zero

■ Pwortt* r»*atic-n»nfjn*c_ -mkI ”S1 5

e 0

Ii 5

10 kT

5 0 5 1C 15

Kilometers Irom Ground ZeroFig. R.1. Nuclear t«-m>rn>ui incident damage n

Significant dlffwencw in fallout patlrntf can tv»ultdirection* and (peed* at varying altitude* fB

nod fallout pattern: from varying wind

uddrnnier and Dillon, 2009)

5

boverall
Placed Image
Page 6: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Long Term Effects

• Delayed Effects of Acute RadiationExposure (DEARE)- Pulmonary fibrosis

• Solid tumors• Leukemias

MECHANISM OF DISEASE

Ionizing Versus Non-ionizingRadiation

• Ionizing radiation interacts withhuman body through direct andindirect effects- Directly- Indirectly

non-tonJzIng ionizing

i~thirr• Non-ionizing radiation(microwaves, UV)

Does nol ionize other atoms or leadto the formation of free radicals • sr

•ST'ref

6

boverall
Placed Image
Page 7: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Radiation Damage

• Deterministic- Threshold dose- Local radiation injur)1- Acute radiation syndrome

* Stochastic- Random-Oncogenensis-Teratogenesis

Radiation Physics 101

f

Radioactive Decay

• Atoms decay to reach a more stable state byemitting inonizing radiation in the form ofparticles or penetrating radiation (Gamma rays).

- \/t "v.

Beta

7

boverall
Placed Image
Page 8: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Different Types of Radiation

-0 Especially damaging tointernal tissues if mnateo

Damaging to Internalnssuasff Inuied pr

�o-vad and can cau*I saw bums

I

Types of Ionizing Radiation

Radiation Units: S.I. Versus USA

1 Gray (Gy) =1 Sievert (Sv) =

100 x RAD100 x REM

8

boverall
Placed Image
Page 9: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

2 Different yet PossibleOverlapping Entities

• Contamination- External- Internal

• Exposure- Whole body- Partial body

Radiation Protection in WholeBody Exposure

IS 1210ÿi

ili

9

boverall
Placed Image
Page 10: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Pick the Appropriate Personal ProtectiveEquipment (PPE)!

WHEN CARING FOR THESEPATIENTS

9 m*

.

_v* V 1

i

kC

'rrii11

Respiratory Protection• Common!) available protective masks nrcgeneralh sufficient pre-

decontanunation• OSHA'MIOSH Hospital staff taking care of patients tn the pre-

dccontanunation and decontamination areas. PAPRs or HEPA filternegative pressure masks arc described as minimum

' ’PERSONAL PROTECTIONREQUIRED BEYOND THIS

REQUIRED BEYOI

TRAUMAÿ TRAUI

10

boverall
Placed Image
Page 11: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Personal Protection• Standard Precautions

ft ■VrRAUMA 1

□* -

Radiation Detection in the EDt• Victims should be surveyed withGeiger-Mtiller counters.

Radiation Detection in the ED

--i❖ Survey patient for radiologicalcontamination and mark areas on bodydiagram.❖ Remove contaminated clothes and labelthem.❖Except lor an instance ofhighly-radioactive shrapnel, contaminationshould NOT deter medical staff from treatinglife-threatening injuries.

A.A11

boverall
Placed Image
Page 12: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Radiation Survey in the ED andDecontamination

JI i§

. ' L*[

c

I'll

DIAGNOSIS OF INTERNALCONTAMINATION

12

boverall
Placed Image
Page 13: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

In Vivo Measurements• Whole body counters• Chest counters for

Plutonium and Uranium• Wound monitoring

instruments 1Whole Body Dosimetry

• Using whole body counters or scanners thatare potentially available at nuclear medicinedepartments.

• It is crucial to know when thecontamination occurs as well as whichradionuclide is involved.

www.bt.cdd.gov/radiation/clinicians/evaluation/index.as

Diagnosis By Excretion(Bioassay) Sampling

• Collect unne or feces to measure excretion rates• Challenging interpretation

Time when conlamtnationoccuredCharctenstics of inhaled or internalized radionuclides

13

boverall
Placed Image
Page 14: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Internal ContaminationAcute Radiation Syndrome

CLINICAL IMPACT ANDCONSEQUENCES

Clinical Consequences of InternalContamination

• Acute and subacute- Lnd organ dammage- Acute Radiation Syndrome- Multiorgan failure

• Chronic-Solid tumors- Leukemias

Management Strategies

♦ Supportive care• Decreasing absorption• Decorporation and enhance elimination• Long term monitoring

14

boverall
Placed Image
Page 15: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Internal Contamination

Iodine Kt (potassium iodide)

Transuranics such asPlutonium& Americium

Zn-DTPACa-DTPA

Uranium Bicarbonate

CesiumRubidiumThallium

Prussian Blue*[Ferrihexacyano- Ferrate (II)]

Tritium Water

Transuranics• Used for Transuranics such

as Plutonium andAmericium

• first dose should beCalcium DTPA followed b\Zinc DTPA

• Duration of therapy will beguided by urine or fecestransuranic concentrations

»OTP*j

Cesium-137• 46 Goiania pts contaminated with

Cs-137 treated with PrussianBlue

• Less than 1 % is absorbed• Exchanges a cation and binds

Cesium or Thallium• Decreases GI absorption and

mlemits enterohepalic circulationr-

15

boverall
Placed Image
Page 16: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Radioactive Iodine Exposure

• iodine Prophylaxis and Treatment- Potassium iodide (Kl) is an effective, inexpensive

thyroid-blocking agent

\! /

\

' (. ' \ l" —m QJTIIÿROII)

131113 1 1

Saturate the Critical Organ with the Stable Isotope

ACUTE RADIATIONSYNDROME (ARS)

16

boverall
Placed Image
Page 17: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Acute Radiation Syndrome(ARS)

• Deterministic effect• Prodrome phase• Hematopoetic syndrome• Gastrointestinal

syndrome• CV/’CNS syndrome

IWCKtAHi

Prodrone• Vague Sx nausea.

vomiting, headache.♦ Help predict the dose.

the higher the absorbeddose the earlier and themore frequent the Sxoccur

D»t»fttomi

VlrtiM T«*» toOnwt olVomiting

ht.

0191

2 4«3 ia

72 174ttb t r.94 099* 07?99 066

*00 0«

15 June 2004 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume NO •Number 12

Hematopoetic Syndrome (2-6 Gy)

|;UT

17

boverall
Placed Image
Page 18: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

Lymphocyte Depletion Kinetics

♦ Andrew's nomogramhelps estimate the doseof radiation.

• WBC withdifferential every6 hrs for firsl24-48 hours.

Normj: rta-vjo

Vocc-atc

Very Se.croiGtra'

Cytogenetics• Rate of dicentric

chromosomes inperipherallymphocytes.

• Available atREAC/TS.

• Takes a few days.

a*

r Jr

ch-o

VJ..M19T1)

Management of theHematopoetic Syndrome

• Complications: infection and bleeding.* Treatment is supportive:

Reverse isolationIVF

- blood products- Antibiotics- Colony stimulating factors such as filgrastim or G-CSF

(300 meg s'c per day)Stem cell transplant

18

boverall
Placed Image
Page 19: 10/2/2015 - Georgia Poison Center · h.!N'& ' l\' l NCRP 165 Page 53 Casualties (10 kT model) • For large city with 2 million population-230.000 immediate fatalities-323.000 injured

10/2/2015

♦mPopulation Monitoring• The process to screen people for radioactive

contamination or exposure to radiation, assist withdecontamination, register, and prioritize for furtherfollow up.

a 1

• Primary objective is to identify people who are inimmediate danger.

• It is a local/state effort: similar to PODs.

w\vw bt cdc gov/'radiatum pdfipopulation-moniloring-guide pdf

Community Reception Centers(CRC)

• The place to conduct population monitoring”• Primary services include

external contamination screening, external decontamination.prioritizing people for further care

• Benefits include- providing needed services to alTccted and concerned people, reducing

burden on hospitals, managing scarce medical resources, supportingpublic shelters

• Staffing- Health physics (radiation safety), nursmg'medical, and general staff

Thank You!

19

boverall
Placed Image