10122617 v5
-
Upload
larua-chen -
Category
Documents
-
view
139 -
download
0
Transcript of 10122617 v5
![Page 1: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Resistance to Brand Switching When a Radically New Brand Is Introduced:
A Social Identity Theory Perspective
Presenter: Laura Chen10122617 Instructor: Dr. Teresa Hsu
Oct. 12, 2012
![Page 2: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
CITATION
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 126-146.
![Page 3: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
PV = Perceived Value
CBI = Customer-Brand Identification
RPV = Relative Perceived Value
RCBI = Relative Customer –Brand Identification
SOME ABBREVIATIONS
![Page 4: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Introduction Literature Review Methodology Result Discussion Conclusion Reflection
CONTENT
![Page 5: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Brand
loyalty
Perceived value
IntroductionSwitching or not?
![Page 6: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
BACKGROUND
The business environment grows more complex and globalized, market disruptions become more prevalent.
Market disruptions can influence the relative standing of brands in the eyes of customers.
![Page 7: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
PURPOSE OF STUDY
Build on social identity theory and the customer –company identification framework to formally propose the concept of customer-brand identification (CBI).
Combine social identity theory and the brand loyalty literature to purpose a conceptual framework of switching behavior.
Test the framework in the contest of a specific kind of market disruption, namely, the introduction of a radically new brand in a competitive market.
![Page 8: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
![Page 9: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Literature Review
![Page 10: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Literature Review
• When Customer experience difficulty in generating positive information about their choice, they may infer that the amount of positive information is rather limited and may reverse their attitude toward the chosen brand.
( Wanke, Bohner, & Jukowitsch, 1997)
10
![Page 11: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Social Identity Theory
People define their self-concepts by their connections with social groups or organizations.
( Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
![Page 12: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Two Perspectives to Switching
Brand switching as functional utility maximization(McFadden, 1986)Brand switching as social mobility (Rao, Davis, & Ward, 2000)
![Page 13: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Research Question
Will customers switch brands only to maximize functional utility?
Is there any customer-brand relationship that drives brand loyalty in the face of market
disruptions?
13
![Page 14: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Methodology
![Page 15: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Participants
• 708 cell phone users
Time
• 10 months during the launch of iphone
Place
• Spain
Focus• Switching behavior
Procedure
![Page 16: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Conduct the first wave
survey before the
actual launch
Other four waves was
carried out at 2 months intervals
Using discrete hazard
models to capture
switching behavior Final data set
including 679 usable responses
![Page 17: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results
![Page 18: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
H1: The greater the RPV of the incumbent brand, the lower is the probability that a customer will switch to the new brand.
![Page 19: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
H2: The greater the RCBI of the incumbent brand the lower the chance a customer will switch to the new brand.
![Page 20: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
H3: The effect of RPV of the incumbent brand on resistance to switching to the new brand will not increase over time.
![Page 21: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
H4: The effect of the RCBI of the incumbent brand on resistance to switching to the new brand will grow stronger over time.
![Page 22: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
H5: The effect of the RCBI of the incumbent brand will be stronger than the effect of relative perceived value of the incumbent brand over time.
![Page 23: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Discussion
![Page 24: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Implication
Different predictors
Social identity
perspective
Switching drivers
Marketing strategy
![Page 25: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Companies can not be successfully disrupt the markets if their products only have attractive functional benefits but not win the identity war.
Conclusion
![Page 26: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• The authors only focused on the disruptions of smart phone market. Other types of market disruptions can be explored in future studies.
• Because of cost concerns, this study could only tracked customers one year.
26
Reflection
![Page 27: 10122617 v5](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062220/5592381d1a28ab4a158b477f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
THANK YOU!