10 Trends - MCLS 2009 Presentation
-
Upload
stacey-aldrich -
Category
Technology
-
view
418 -
download
2
Transcript of 10 Trends - MCLS 2009 Presentation
Statewide Reference Project Update
INTRO Over the past several months, we have been creating a plan for rethinking and retooling the Statewide Reference model. Our plan has been built on past surveys and studies, and is designed to gather more data to complete our
understanding of information usage, and to create a process that will help us truly innovate how we can best provide information services to our communities.
THE PLAN
STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 4 STAGE 5
DEC-MARCH 2008
DATA COLLECTION
APRIL 2008
THINK TANK PREP
FALL 2008
THINK TANK
CLA 2008
STATEWIDE INPUT
END 2008-2009
BUILDING IT
•!Think Tank Creators
group to meet with
futurist facilitators to
design a statewide
reference think tank
process.
•!This group will also
look at all of the data
gathered relating to
statewide ref., and
develop new
combinations to help
the think tank be more
informed.
•!ZOGBY polls to
understand how
Californians find
and use info.
•!Poll I via email was
completed in
January 2008
•!Poll 2 link via library
websites statewide
to be completed in
March 2008.
•!Participants from
across the state will
gather for 1 ! days to
think about information
trends and data, and
create 3 scenarios for
what statewide ref.
could become.
•!Presentations at CLA
and other venues will
be given to share data
and the 3 scenarios.
•!Input from participants
will be gathered. They
will be asked to identify
what scenarios or pieces
of scenarios they think
would be most beneficial
to all.
•!A Builders Group will
be formed to analyze the
feedback from the input
sessions, and to develop
an action plan for creating
the new statewide
reference model.
NEXT
STEP
MAKING
IT HAPPEN
Questions to ponder
1. How do people know things? (thank you Ann Feeney)
2. How do people find & use information?
3. What is community?
4. What is learning?
5. What is leisure and entertainment?
JARGON WATCH
Patternicity n. “The tendency to find patterns where there are none. According to a recent study, evolution favors patternicity because it’s safer to detect false threat than to ignore a real one and become a bogeyman’s lunch meat.”
Jonathan Keats([email protected])Wired May 2009
Thank you!
Twitter: Librarychicaemail: [email protected]