1 WELCOME! Pocatello/Chubbuck District #25 SIOP Coaches Training.
-
Upload
emil-booker -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 WELCOME! Pocatello/Chubbuck District #25 SIOP Coaches Training.
2
Evaluations/QuestionsSIOP Coaches’ Training ObjectivesSIOP Coaches’ Training Objectives
Content Objectives:Coaches will:
Understand how SIOP fits into the district improvement planUnderstand the process and time line for LEP Grant and district implementationLearn spring SIOP coaching expectationsRecognize the importance of observing and calibrating lessons
Language Objectives:SIOP Coaches will participate in observing other coaches and calibrating lessons
5
SIOP
Tier I: Core Instruction ALL
Tier II Supported Instruction
SOME
Tier IIIIntensive
Instruction FEW
RtI: Pyramid of Interventions:
7
LEP Enhancement Grant
• $50,000 per year 08-11 • Meet the needs of LEP Learners
AcademicLinguisticCultural Needs
10
SIOP Training ObjectivesSIOP Training ObjectivesContent Objectives:
Administrators will: Understand how SIOP fits into the district improvement planUnderstand the process and time line for district implementationLearn what to expect from building SIOP coachesLearn the 8 components of SIOP Instructional Framework
Language Objectives:Administrators will begin to develop a SIOP-related lexicon
11
Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction
• Communicating Clearly and Accurately– Teacher’s oral and
written communication is clear and expressive, anticipating possible student misconceptions.
• SIOP Components1. Preparation 2. Building Background3. Comprehensible
Input
12
Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction
• Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques– Students formulate
many of the high-level questions and assume responsibility for the participation of all students in the discussion.
• SIOP Component4. Strategies
13
Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction
• Providing Feedback to Students– Teacher’s feedback to
students is timely and of consistently high quality, and students make use of the feedback in their learning.
• SIOP Component8. Review/Assessment
14
Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction
• Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness– Teacher is highly
responsive to student’ interests and questions, making major adjustments if necessary, and persist in ensuring the success of all students.
• SIOP Component2. Building Background7. Lesson Delivery
15
Domain 3: InstructionDomain 3: Instruction
• Engaging Students in Learning– Students are highly
engaged throughout the lesson and make meaningful contributions to the representation of content, the activities and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure.
• SIOP Components5. Interaction6. Practice and Application7. Lesson Delivery
16
Pocatello/Chubbuck Demographics
• 16 different languages
• 65% Hispanic– Up from 47% last year
• Greatest number of ESL students in any building is 8
• District migrant population is 5
17
District Classified in Improvement
•Improvement 1 3rd Indicator-Graduation Rate, Improvement 2 Reading, Alert
Math•Graduation Rate (83.32% - needed 84.2%)•American Indian Reading Proficiency (60.24%)•Hispanic Reading Proficiency (71.64%)•LEP Reading Proficiency (48.94%)•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (74.52%)•Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (51.11%)•African American Math Proficiency (62.92%)•American Indian Math Proficiency (47.77%)•Hispanic Math Proficiency (63.33%)•LEP Math Proficiency (57.45%)•Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (65.07%)•Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (44.89%)
18
Percent Proficient by Special Percent Proficient by Special ProgramsPrograms
Reading
74.5%75.6%75.9%71.3%61.0%
51.1%
38.5% 36.6%34.2%
22.3%
48.9%
62.8%52.0%
45.5%
25.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Spring 2003 Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Economically Disadvantaged Special Ed LEP
19
Percent Proficient by Special Percent Proficient by Special ProgramsPrograms
Math
57.5%48.7%62.9%
72.9%65.9% 65.1%
18.8%
33.0%43.9%
38.0% 44.9%37.5%
68.2%
44.0%
75.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Spring 2003 Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Spring 2006 Spring 2007
Economically Disadvantaged Special Ed LEP
20
Active LEP Students IELA Comparison 2006-07
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
students
loss
- g
ain
listening growth
speaking growth
reasoning growth
writing growth
compreh growth
21
LEP-X students IELA 2006-07 Comparison
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
students
los
s -
ga
in
listening growth
speaking growth
reading growth
writing growth
compreh. growth
Total growth
level growth
22
Past Practices
• Two ESL teachers traveled to the 20 buildings.
• 30 minutes, maximum, instruction time to each students, often in small, mixed ability groups.
23
Changes to the ESL program
• We purchased ELLis Essentials software to support the elementary students.
• An evaluation of individual student needs allowed a priority list to be developed.
24
Changes to the ESL program• This year, we began a secondary magnet
program. • 7 – 12 grade students travel to an ESL
classroom for first and second hour.• Twelve students and two teachers are involved.• ELLis Academic software was purchased for
reinforcement.
25
Evaluations/QuestionsSIOP Coaches Training 07-09• Identified 2 coaches per elementary• 4 coaches per secondary• Coaches received 5.5 days of training• Monthly follow-up training
26
Spring SIOP Coaching• Post content and language objectives• Observe another coach and calibrate one SIOP lesson component
- Include a pre/post conference - Money for subs is available
•Turn in Spring SIOP Lesson Calibration form by Monday, May 8th
27
Spring SIOP Lesson CalibrationSIOP Coaches Name: _________________________________ School:__________________
SIOP Coach Observed:________________________________ Date:______ Time:_________
Lesson Component Observed/Calibrated___________________________________________
Comments: __________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Please return form to Kathy Luras by Monday, May 18th. Thank You!