1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.
-
Upload
paul-spencer -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.
![Page 1: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
UTA & Alternative Fuel VehiclesGOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMITJUNE 2014
![Page 2: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Strategic and Board Goal Alignment
2020 Strategic Plan‘Operate a balanced fleet of alternative fuel vehicles’
2014 Board Goal‘Complete construction of an on-site CNG fueling facility’
![Page 3: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Why Alternative Fuels?
• Vehicle fuel consumption is the second largest operating expenditure at UTA (Labor is #1)
• Spread risk associated with future fuel volatility
• Participation in new funding resources:• Utah Clean Cities Coalition – nearly $2
million in alternative fuel vehicles
• Better air quality
• Leveraging evolving efficiency technologies
• Since 1995, use of diesel fuel at transit agencies across the country has decreased more than 20% while the combined used of alternative fuel types* has increased more than 800%
67%
15%
12%
6%
Labor
Fuel
Other
Parts
*
* Includes electricity for rail propulsion
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Diesel Other
1995 2009
*
* GNC, LNG, gasoline, and Bio-diesel
![Page 4: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
UTA’s Fleet Mix
Today 2023*
45%42%
6%7%
Diesel (Pre-2006)
Clean Diesel
Hybrid
CNG77%
6%
17%
Clean Diesel
Hybrid
CNG
* Based on 2014 Bus Replacement Schedule
![Page 5: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Fuel Volatility
20102011
20122013
20142015
20162017
20182019
20202021
20222023
20242025
20262027
20282029
20302031
20322033
20342035
20362037
20382039
2040 $-
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
$1.20
Projected Fuel Cost ComparisonsPer Mile*, in 2013 Dollars
Diesel Diesel ProjectedNatural Gas Natural Gas ProjectedElectric Electric Projected
*Assumptions
2010 Diesel (MPG): 4.3
CNG (MPGe): 3.5
Electric (@ 2.3 kWh/Mile)*: 17
Source: ANNUAL ENERGY OUTLOOK 2014, US Energy Information Administration
![Page 6: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Diesel Buses
• Currently four hundred fifty five (455) in the UTA Fleet• Pre-2006 Diesel Vehicles – 239• “Clean Diesel” Vehicles – 216
• Most common, reliable, highest horsepower technology available
• Existing infrastructure for fueling and maintenance
![Page 7: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
CNG Buses
• Currently twenty four (24) in the UTA Fleet
• Technology is being used by more than 40 transit agencies in North America
• Fuel can be locally sourced
• Lower emissions of criteria air pollutants• Compared to a model year 2000 diesel bus, a model year 2012 CNG
bus emits:• 80% less NOx• 99% less PM• 100% less Hydrocarbons
![Page 8: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Hybrid Buses
• Currently thirty two (32) in the UTA Fleet
• Technology is being used by more than 60 transit agencies in North America
• Diesel-electric technology combines two energy converters:• An internal combustion engine• Electric battery powered drive
![Page 9: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Electric Buses
Current Top Manufacturers• Proterra• BYD• Compete Coachworks
Charging Technologies• Conduction
• Overhead• Embedded (WAVE)
• Overnight (Plug in)
Current US Agencies Using the Technology
Proterra
BYD
Complete Coach Works
![Page 10: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Capital Cost Comparisons
Diesel B
us
CNG Bus
Hybrid
Bus
Electric
Bus (CCW
- WAVE)
Electric
Bus (BYD - C
onductive
)
Electric
Bus (BYD - O
vernight)
Electric
Bus (Proterra
- Conduct.
..$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
Bus Capital Costs (Including Charging Infrastructure & Battery)
Base Bus Cost Charging Infrastructure & Battery
![Page 11: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Electric Buses – Capital Costs
Proterra
BYD
Complete Coach Works
Electric Bus (CCW - WAVE)
Electric Bus (BYD - Conductive)
Electric Bus (BYD - Overnight)
Electric Bus (Proterra - Conductive)
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
Electric Bus Capital Costs Breakdown*
Base Bus Cost Charging Infrastructure Battery Cost
* Costs are for one (1) bus and (1) set of Infrastructure, economies of scale can be realized with larger fleet sizes
![Page 12: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Projected Lifecycle Operations and Maintenance Cost Comparisons
*Assumptions:- Twelve (12) year vehicle life- 34,000 annual miles (UTA average)- 7% annual fuel price increase- 3% annual electricity cost increase- At least one (1) battery replacement for electric vehicles- Bus systems and infrastructure estimated to last 8 years; 8 year amortization for all systems & infrastructure- Numbers shown are in Net Present Value (NPV)
Electric
Bus (CCW
- WAVE)
Electric
Bus (BYD - O
vernight)
CNG Bus
Diesel B
us
Electric
Bus (BYD - C
onductive
)
Hybrid
Bus
Electric
Bus (Proterra
- Conducti
ve)
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
Vehicle Lifecycle Costs (12 Years)
Base Bus Cost Fuel/Energy Costs O&M
![Page 13: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Depot District Service Center
Sustain operations• Support maintenance and fueling
of existing fleet in a safe, efficient, well-designed facility
Increase options• Allow expansion of Central Garage
fleet• Facilitate exploration of other fuel
types• Conduit for charging future electric
vehicles• Flexibility to accommodate other
vehicle types
![Page 14: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Key Issues
• Initial capital costs
• Operations & Maintenance• Training• Facilities
• Additional public infrastructure required
• Unproven Technology
![Page 15: 1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e9d5503460f94b9e8f2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Thank you!
G.J. LaBontyManager, Long Range & Strategic Planning
Utah Transit Authority