1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS...
-
Upload
roy-hampton -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS...
![Page 1: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide
PingER
Presented by Les Cottrell, SLACAt the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003
![Page 2: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
History of the PingER Project
• Early 1990’s: SLAC begins pinging nodes around the world to evaluate the quality of Internet connectivity between SLAC and other HEP Institutions.
• Around 1996: The PingER project was funded making it the first Internet end-to-end monitoring tool available to the HEP community.
• Today: Believed to be the most extensive Internet end-to-end performance monitoring tool in the world
PingER
![Page 3: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
PingER Today• Today, the PingER Project includes 35 Monitoring-
hosts in 12 countries. They are monitoring Remote-hosts in 80 countries.
PingER
• THESE COUNTRIES COVER 75% OF THE WORLD POPULATION AND 99% OF THE INTERNET CONNECTED POPULATION!!!
![Page 4: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Methodology
Internet11 ping request packets each 30 mins
RemoteHost(typicallya server)
Monitoring host
>ping remhost
Ping response packets
Measure Round Trip Time & Loss
![Page 5: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
PingER Architecture
There are three types of hosts
• Remote-hosts: hosts being
monitored
REMOTE
REMOTEREMOTE
REMOTE
REMOTE
REMOTEREMOTE
REMOTE
PingER
![Page 6: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
PingER Architecture
There are three types of hosts
• Remote-hosts: hosts being
monitored• Monitoring-hosts: make ping
measurements to remote hosts
Monitoring
Monitoring Monitoring
Monitoring
REMOTE
REMOTEREMOTE
REMOTE
REMOTE
REMOTEREMOTE
REMOTE
PingER
![Page 7: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
PingER Architecture
There are three types of hosts
• Remote-hosts: hosts being
monitored• Monitoring-hosts: Make ping
measurements to remote hosts
• Archive/Analysis- hosts: gather data from
Monitoring-sites, analyze & make reports
Archive
Archive
Monitoring
Monitoring Monitoring
Monitoring
REMOTE
REMOTEREMOTE
REMOTE
REMOTE
REMOTEREMOTE
REMOTE
PingER
![Page 8: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
• Performance is improving
• Developed world improving factor of 10 in 4-5 years
• S.E. Europe, Russia, catching up
• India & Africa worse off & falling behind
• Developing world 3-10 years behind
Worldwide performance
• Many institutes in developing world have less performance than a household in N. America or Europe
![Page 9: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Current State – Aug ‘03 (throughput Mbps)
• Within region performance better– E.g. Ca|EDU|GOV-NA, Hu-SE Eu, Eu-Eu, Jp-E Asia, Au-Au, Ru-Ru|
Baltics• Africa, Caucasus, Central & S. Asia all bad
Bad < 200kbits/s < DSL Poor > 200 < 500kbits/s
Acceptable > 500kbits/s, < 1000kbits/s
Good > 1000kbits/s
Monitoring Country
Rem
ote
regi
ons
![Page 10: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Loss Comparisons with Development (UNDP)
Positive correlation with Human Development or GDP
![Page 11: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Network Readiness Index vs Throughput
• NRI from Center for International Development, Harvard U. http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cr/pdf/gitrr2002_ch02.pdf
• NRI correlates reasonably well with Network Readiness
Internet for all focusA
&R
focus
NRI Top 14Finland 5.92US 5.79Singapore 5.74Sweden 5.58Iceland 5.51Canada 5.44UK 5.35Denmark 5.33Taiwan 5.31Germany 5.29Netherlands 5.28Israel 5.22Switzerland 5.18Korea 5.10
![Page 12: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Typical uses• Troubleshooting
Discerning if a reported problem is network related Identify the time a problem started Provide quantitative analysis for Network
specialists Identifying step functions, periodic network
behavior, and recognize problems affecting multiple sites.
Setting expectations Identifying need to upgrade
Providing quantitative information to Policy makers & Funding agencies
Seeing the effects of upgradesPingER
![Page 13: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
In SummaryPingER provides ongoing support for monitoring and
maintaining the quality of Internet connectivity for the world wide scientific community.
Information is available publicly on the webwww-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/pingtable.pl
PingER also quantifies the extent of the “Digital Divide” and provides information to policy makers and funding agencies.
PingER
![Page 14: 1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022033108/56649f0c5503460f94c1fed1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
For More Information• We need contacts in developing countries
– (send email to [email protected])
• PingER:
– www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger/• eJDS
– www.ejds.org/• ICFA/SCIC Network Monitoring report, Jan03
– www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/icfa/icfa-net-paper-dec02
• Monitoring the Digital Divide, CHEP03 paper
– http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0305/0305016.pdf• The PingER Project: Active Internet Performance Monitoring for
the HENP Community, IEEE Communications Magazine on Network Traffic Measurements and Experiments.
PingER