1 The future of adult social care regulation Lynda Laney and Suzy Tucker. Inspectors.
-
Upload
bryce-chambers -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 The future of adult social care regulation Lynda Laney and Suzy Tucker. Inspectors.
1
The future of adult social care regulation
Lynda Laney and Suzy Tucker. Inspectors
Working to improve quality of care
Staff
Providers
Regulators
Commissioners
Together
Public
CQC purpose and role
Our purposeWe make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve
Our role
We monitor, inspect and regulate services to make sure they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety and we publish what we find, including performance ratings to help people choose care
3
The Mum (or anyone you love) Test
Is it good enough for my Mum?
Is it safe?
Is it caring?
Is iteffective?
Is it responsive to people’s needs?
Is itwell-led?
4
What we do:
Set clear expectations
Monitor and inspect
Publish and rate
Celebrate success
Tackle failure
Signpost help
Influence debate
Work in partnership
Regulation to inspire improvement
How we do it:
Five key questions
Respond to concerns
Key lines of enquiry
Specialist inspectors
Experts by experience
Ratings characteristics
Reports
Enforcement
Regulation to inspire improvement
Inspecting learning disability services
Safe
• Safeguarding.
• Risk assessments. Positive risk taking.
• Supporting people whose behaviour may challenge services.
• Accidents and incidents.
• Staffing levels. Recruitment.
• Medicines.
• Managing people’s finances.
• Premises.
7
Inspecting learning disability services
Effective
• Staff skill and knowledge.
• Induction, training and supervision. Bespoke training.
• Staff ability to communicate with people.
• Mental Capacity Act and DoLS.
• Eating and drinking.
• Health and adaptation of premises.
NB. New care certificate
8
Inspecting learning disability services
Caring
• Staff approach and relationships
• Response to Equality and Diversity
• Involving people
• Communication as a 2 way process, presenting info and listening.
• Advocacy
• Confidentiality, privacy and dignity.
9
Inspecting learning disability services
Responsive
• Person centred care. Assessment, planning and review.
• Activities, interests, education, work.
• How are people involved in the community?
• Concerns and complaints. How do you know if a person is unhappy? What do you do with that?
• Transitions between services.
10
Inspecting learning disability services
Well-led
• Culture of the service. Vision and values.
• Management and leadership.
• Openness and transparency.
• Responsibility and accountability.
• Community links.
• Auditing processes.
• Quality of service and keeping up to date with developments in your field.
11
Inspecting learning disability services. Before the visit.• PIR.
• Any notifications, concerns or enquiries.
• Contacting external professionals.
• Consider using experts by experience, specialist advisors, pharmacy inspectors or additional inspectors.
• Decide whether to announce the visit.
12
Inspecting learning disability services. On the day.• Pathway tracking.
• Observations (SOFI).
• Talking to people, relatives, carers and advocates.
• Talking to staff and managers.
• Records.
13
Reporting on learning disability services• Easy Read.
• Mental Capacity Act & DoLS.
• KLOES.
• One page summary.
• Rating.
• Factual accuracy process.
14
15
New for April 2015
Fundamental standardsFit and proper person requirement
Duty of candour
Special measures
Scores on the doors
Market oversight
16
Scores on the Doors
PurposePublic able to see rating of service quickly and easily
Actions for providersDisplay ratings in service and website
Suggest accompany with additional information
CQCWill provide template
Inspection – check that rating is displayed
17
What are we finding?
Outstanding
Good
Requires improvement
Inadequate
4329
23 (1%)
2516 (58%)
1448(33%)
342(8%)
Outstanding care
18
‘People’s preferences, likes and dislikes had been recorded and responded to by supporting people to achieve new targets and live life to their fullest ability.’
‘People went on exciting trips and experienced adventurous holidays.’
‘The registered manager told us she had a good staff team who had always responded to her challenge with innovative ideas.’
Ling Crescent
Another outstanding care home
"We didn't think we were outstanding. And perhaps that's why we were – I think it's because we see every single person as an individual. It is our privilege to support them to live the last years of
their life with as much happiness, love and security as we can give them."
Suzanne, Prince of Wales House, Ipswich
19