1 Teams and Conflict Presented by Sue Leonard Organizational Effectiveness Consultant.
-
Upload
nicholas-sutton -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Teams and Conflict Presented by Sue Leonard Organizational Effectiveness Consultant.
2
Outline
Definition of conflict
Sources of conflict
Preventing unproductive conflict
Managing conflict
4
Definitions from Group Facilitators
1. a great opportunity to discover the true measure of team members/mates. John Prins
2. productive, when channeled correctly. Undressed conflict seethes and rears its ugly later. Conflict can enable change. Use the power of conflict the strengthen the team, not destroy it. Ann-Marie Johnson, Computer Sciences Corporation
3. often rooted in misunderstanding of others' views. Peg Kelley
4. the source of the most creative solutions. Molly Samuels, The Molidori Group, Inc.
5. like a golf club. It can be used to move you forward. It can hook or slice you off to the side of the fairway. Or it can be used as a weapon. It all depends on how it's handled. Ned Ruete
6. often downplayed or ignored. Royleen White, RWA
7. often a sign that, if you hold your nerve, a breakthrough is coming. Richard Seel, Facilitative Consultancy & Development.
8. never about what it seems to be about on the surface.
9. both risk and opportunity -- we can choose.
10. inevitable, inevitable and option generating, a) Inevitable b) beneficial
11. the corollary (to the above) is ..so use it don't try to avoid it. James Holgate, Holgate Consulting Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia
12. the precursor to innovation, if properly managed.
13. natural and can result in creative, innovative solutions or disastrous business results depending on how it is managed.
14. likely to occur. It's outcome will depend on the kind of conflict awareness, emotional fabric, power arrangement and coping skills of the team members.
15. the sound of opportunity for integration made by an encounter of differing styles, stocks of information, perspectives, or sets of values.
Conflict in teams is...
5
The positive sides of conflict
My favorite analogy is to a sailboat.It moves precisely because there is friction between the sails and the wind. Without that conflict, it is not properly functioning. The same can be said for us.
Strategic Conflict Management Associates
Conflict is normal and ever-present. It is their personal perception of it as negative or nonproductive and a lack of skills and mechanisms to manage it that causes people alarm.
6
Role of emotion in conflict
Emotional reaction is brought on by the perceived or actual threat of losing something important (sometimes simply control).
“In fact, everything in business is personal, and it should be. It is the major place where we spend our lives, and we all care deeply about what happens at work, both with the work to be done and the people around us. We pay a high price when we deny self-expression…The source of all energy, passion, motivation and internally generated desire to do good work is our own feeling…” Peter Block, The Empowered Manager, page 28
7
Redirecting emotion
Acknowledge the importance of the issue
Understand the potential loss/threat
Let the persons know you are seeking a win-win
8
Role of styles in conflict
People have different preferences
– in what information they trust
– in their criteria for decision making
– in what motivates them to act
We tend to think our style is the ‘right’ way and overuse it
Styles/preferences can be a huge source of conflict
9
Myers-Briggs Preference for Gathering Data*
Sensing – 70% sensory experience
concrete
facts
details
experience
present
literal
practical (to practice/here & now)
iNtuitive – 30%
impressions •
abstract •
symbols •
patterns – big picture •
theory •
future •
figurative; out-of-the-box •
theoretical •
* Myers, Isabel Briggs, Introduction to Type, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1993.
10
Myers-Briggs Decision-Making Preferences
Thinking – 50% objective
truth
analytical
clarity
non-personal
task
principle
what
Feeling – 50%
subjective •
value •
situational •
interpersonal •
harmony •
espirit-de-corps •
principals •
who •
11
Prevention
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
Setting and communicating goals, roles and expectations
Setting agreed-upon ground rules for teams and meetings
Understanding and clarifying the elements of an agreement
– conditions of satisfaction: standards of performance, time, cost, etc.
– person’s ability to fulfill : competence, sincerity, ability to commit
12
Sample Ground Rules*
One conversation at a time
Accept and respect the views of others (seek to understand)
Keep discussion relevant
Consensus is ...
No smoking
Session leader chooses who speaks
Speak for yourself, say “I” not “we”
No finger-pointing
The group is responsible for the outcome; The team speaks with one voice after the decision is made
No idea is bad
Arrive on time and end on time
Keep discussion on issues over which group has control
Everyone has the responsibility to contribute
Ideas belong to the group, not the individual
13
Shared Wisdom
Every person has a piece of the wisdom
Nobody has it all and we all have different pieces
We are not trying to convert others to our own views
14
Tools You Can Use
Preventing unproductive conflict
– Advocacy versus Inquiry
– Ladder of Inference
– Polarity management
– Well-formed outcome
Managing conflict
– Conflict resolution styles
– Harvard Negotiation Project (Getting to Yes)
– Fools Rush In
15
Advocacy versus Inquiry
Advocacy can close us off from learning
Advocacy without inquiry begets more advocacy: it snowballs
Most managers are trained to be advocates
When advocacy and inquiry are combined, the goal is no longer to win the argument, but to find the best argument
Stage 1: Learning how to inquire in other’s views when don’t agree
Stage 2: State own views so as to invite others to inquire into them
* Senge, Peter M, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, NY, 1990.
16
Ladder of Inference*A common mental pathway of increasing abstraction, often leading to misguided beliefs
Observable “data” & experiences
(like video)
I select“data”
I addmeanings
(cultural & personal)
I makeassumptions
(based on meanings)
I drawconclusions
I adoptbeliefs
about the world
I takeactions
based on my beliefs
* Senge, Peter, Kleiner, Art, Roberts, Charlotte, Ross, Richard, Smith Brian The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook, NY, Doubleday, 1994.
17
Polarity Management: Using Two Perspectives*
* Johnson, Barry, Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems, MA, HRD Press, Inc., 1992.
A vase or two faces?
-If you see only the vase your perspective is accurate, but incomplete
-If you see only the faces your perspective is accurate, but incomplete
-To see both images, you have to extend some effort to switch back and forth
18
Only half of the picture*
+
-
TAKING ACTION
PLANNING
•don’t see any action•never get anywhere
•get results•won’t know what really need until start
* Johnson, Barry, Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems, MA, HRD Press, Inc., 1992.
19
Well-formed outcome*
1. What do you want and what will that do for you? (desired state)
2. How will you know when you have it?
3. Where, when with whom do you want it?
4. Ecology. What impact will (your desired outcome) have on other aspects of your life?
5. What stops you from having your desired outcome?
6. What resources do you already have that contribute to getting to your outcome?
7. What additional resources do you need?
8. How are you going to get there?
* Andreas, Connirae, Andreas, Steve, Heart of the Mind, UT, Real People Press, 1989. Pages 242-250
20
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode*
COMPETING COLLABORATING
COMPROMISING
AVOIDING ACCOMMODATING
UNCOOPERATIVE COOPERATIVE
UN
AS
SE
RT
IVE
AS
SE
RT
IVE
AS
SE
RT
IVE
NE
SS
COOPERATIVENESS
* Thomas, Kenneth W., Kilmann, Ralph H., Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, NY, XICOM Incorporated, 1974.
21
Getting to Yes*
Separate the people from the problem
Focus on interests, not positions
Invent options for mutual gain
Insist on using objective criteria
* Fisher, Roger and Ury, William, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, NY, Penguin Books, 1991
22
Intervening in Interpersonal Conflict Situations*
Confrontation means requiring another person to pay attention to something you think is important
When (and when not) to intervene
– Readiness
– Commitment
– Influencability
– Accessibility
* Jones, John E., Fools Rush In, Organizational Universe Systems, 1996 (article attached)