1 Superstars of macroeconomics 1 Irving Fisher, Yale (1867-1947) James Tobin, Yale (1918-2002)...

download 1 Superstars of macroeconomics 1 Irving Fisher, Yale (1867-1947) James Tobin, Yale (1918-2002) Milton Friedman, Chicago (1912-2006) Robert Mundell, Columbia.

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of 1 Superstars of macroeconomics 1 Irving Fisher, Yale (1867-1947) James Tobin, Yale (1918-2002)...

  • Slide 1
  • 1 Superstars of macroeconomics 1 Irving Fisher, Yale (1867-1947) James Tobin, Yale (1918-2002) Milton Friedman, Chicago (1912-2006) Robert Mundell, Columbia (1932 - ) J. M. Keynes, Kings College (1883-1946) Janet Yellen, the Fed (1946 - )
  • Slide 2
  • Debts and Deficits Last time: -Conceptual issues of debts and deficits -Deficits and slower growth of potential Y in the closed economy -Role of deficit spending in recessions, particularly in the liquidity trap Today: -To raise or lower G in recessions, Europe and US today? -The death spiral of debt and default 2
  • Slide 3
  • Two Views of the Great Unraveling (I): Soft Landing The two faces of saving and the deficit dilemma
  • Slide 4
  • 4 What are the effects of deficit reduction on the economy? 1. In short run: Higher savings is contractionary Mechanism: higher S, lower AD, lower Y (straight Keynesian effect) 2. In long-run: Higher savings leads to higher potential output Mechanism: higher I, K, Y, w, etc. (neoclassical growth model) Dilemma of the deficit: Should we raise G today or lower G?
  • Slide 5
  • Real output (Y) Inflation AD AS Impact of fiscal stimulus AS AD ?
  • Slide 6
  • The dilemma of the deficit To illustrate, I use a little simulation model built from our five equation IS-MP model plus a Solow growth model. Then compare (1) a large stimulus program to reach full employment (2) a balanced budget program Use historical data, calibrated model, and plausible projections of variables. 6
  • Slide 7
  • Stimulus v. balanced budget in 2012 -Balance budget in 4 years (EU style austerity) -Stimulate to reach FE in 3 years (Krugman style superstimulus) -Assume that 50% of public dissaving is offset by private saving. 7
  • Slide 8
  • Actual deficits: trillion a year 8
  • Slide 9
  • The long-term debt Have higher debt-GDP ratio for long time 9
  • Slide 10
  • But the economy pays the price in high U -With fiscal austerity, have long period of stagnation. 10
  • Slide 11
  • Lower potential with stimulus Slower growth in potential with stimulus because the debt causes lower capital stock 11
  • Slide 12
  • Cumulative Difference in GDP Because of recession, balanced budget doesnt make it up in a generation, even without discounting. 12
  • Slide 13
  • 13 Conclusions on Debt and Deficits Central long-run impact of fiscal policy is on POTENTIAL output through impact on national savings rate. But in deep recessions, particularly in liquidity trap, need larger deficits to stimulate ACTUAL output reach full employment. So policy needs differ in recession and full employment.
  • Slide 14
  • Economics of External Debts
  • Slide 15
  • Debt and financial crises Political incentives for additional borrowing could change quickly if financial markets began to penalize the United States for failing to put its fiscal house in order. If investors become less certain of full repayment or believe that the country is pursuing an inflationary course that would allow it to repay the debt with devalued dollars, they could begin to charge a risk premium on U.S. Treasury securities. That could happen suddenly in a confidence crisis and ensuing financial shock. There is precedent for a financial disruption first contributing to large, chronic deficits and then in some cases contributing to the loss of investor confidence and even to a default on a nations debt. [However,] the unique position of the United Statesbecause of its economic dominance and the dominant role of the dollar internationallymake it difficult to extrapolate from the experience of other nations in estimating the risk or timing of a financial crisis arising from failure to address the projected U.S. fiscal imbalance. [National Academy of Sciences panel, Choosing the Nations Fiscal Future, 2009] 15
  • Slide 16
  • American Econ Review, August 2011. Also see their book, This Time is Different..
  • Slide 17
  • Misinterpretation by Deficit Commissioner When the markets lose confidence in a country, they act swiftly and they act decisively. Look at Greece, look at Portugal, look at Ireland, look at Spain.* If they markets lose confidence in this country and we continue to build up these enormous deficits and debt, they will act swiftly and decisively. [Erskine Bowles, Chair, Presidents Commission] * BTW: This is completely wrong analytically. 17
  • Slide 18
  • Defaults and restructuring are endemic Default: A sovereign default is defined as the failure to meet a principal or interest payment on the due date (or within the specified grace period). These are often called restructuring or repudiation but have the same effect. 18
  • Slide 19
  • Reinhard and Rogoff, From Financial Crash to Debt Crisis, AER, 2011
  • Slide 20
  • Fiscal deficits plus loss of confidence pushes over the tipping point to where cannot refinance debts Country fiscal position Rising risk premium and interest burden
  • Slide 21
  • REVIEW: Romer debt model Basic ideas: -This is the run on the bank as applied to countries. -Basic idea is that have an instability because of the impact of risk on country interest rates (r d = r w + ). -Two equilibria: good (full employment) and bad (default) Assumptions: -Government has debt of D and default probability . -Governments have a random tax revenue, T, with cdf F(T). -Interest: -When T < RD, the government defaults
  • Slide 22
  • REVIEW: Math of Romer model -Investor equilibrium: -Government default occurs when T < RD, which has a cdf (cumulative distribution function): -We have two equilibrium equations in R and .
  • Slide 23
  • (prob. of default) Government and taxes 1 R (interest factor) 0 Investors REVIEW: Three equilibria
  • Slide 24
  • Simplified Romer model -Investor equilibrium that R = (1+r d ) determined by prob of default: -Assume for simplicity that taxes (T) are known with certainty to be T*. So government default occurs when T < RD : -We have two equilibrium equations in R and . 24
  • Slide 25
  • With adequate revenues, likely to have good equil. (prob. of default) Government and taxes 1 R (interest factor) 0 Investors
  • Slide 26
  • (prob. of default) Government and taxes 1 R (interest factor) 0 Investors With low revenues, multiple equilibrium with bad outcome
  • Slide 27
  • EZ interest rates
  • Slide 28
  • Examples of unstable equilibria
  • Slide 29
  • The unfortunate weak currencies in the EZ Spain and UK had virtually same deficit and fiscal position in 2010. Interest rates on sovereign debt
  • Slide 30
  • What can the EU do? 1.Fiscal austerity, but with great economic cost. 2.Guarantee debts, but this involves north-south transfer. 3.ECB buy bad debt, but moral hazard and hidden transfers. 4.Break up Eurozone, but this has untold economic perils. [See discussion in earlier class.] 30
  • Slide 31
  • Does this apply to the US? Country type 1: What is the historical frequency of foreign debt crises for countries with either fixed exchange rates or debts denominated in external currencies a la Greece, Italy, Spain, Argentina, etc.? Answer: average of 14 every year for last two centuries. Country type 2: What is the historical frequency of foreign debt crises for countries with flexible exchange rates and debts denominated in their own currency? E.g., US. Answer: I could not find one. Why? Because country type 2 can print money ($). Problem is inflation or hyperinflation, not debt crisis. 31
  • Slide 32
  • Final words You have heard of the hard sciences. But macro is a very hard science. Why is it so challenging? Listen to the conversation between Keynes and the revolutionary physicist, Max Planck, that took place at high table in Kings College, Cambridge: Professor Planck, of Berlin, the famous originator of the Quantum Theory, once remarked to me that in early life he had thought of studying economics, but had found it too difficult! Professor Planck could easily master the whole corpus of mathematical economics in a few days. But the amalgam of logic and intuition and the wide knowledge of facts which is required for economic interpretation in its highest form is overwhelmingly difficult.