1 Short title: Zn uptake transporter in rice2 31 KAKENHI Grant Number 16H06296 to J.F.M.). 32 33...
Transcript of 1 Short title: Zn uptake transporter in rice2 31 KAKENHI Grant Number 16H06296 to J.F.M.). 32 33...
1
Short title: Zn uptake transporter in rice 1
2
Title 3
The ZIP transporter family member OsZIP9 contributes to root Zn uptake in rice 4
under Zn-limited conditions 5
6
Authors 7
Sheng Huang1, Akimasa Sasaki1, Naoki Yamaji, Haruka Okada, Namiki Mitani-Ueno 8
and Jian Feng Ma† 9
Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Chuo 2-20-1, Kurashiki, 10
710-0046 Japan 11 1These authors contribute to this work equally 12 †To whom correspondence should be addressed. 13
Jian Feng Ma 14
Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Chuo 2-20-1, Kurashiki, 15
710-0046 Japan 16
E-mail: [email protected] 17
Tel: +81-86-434-1209, Fax: +81-86-434-1209 18
19
One-sentence summary: The zinc transporter OsZIP9, expressed at the exodermis and 20
endodermis of root mature region, contributes to Zn uptake from soil in rice. 21
22
Author contributions 23
S. H., A. S., and J.F.M. conceived and designed the experiments; S. H., A. S., N. Y., H. 24
O., N.M-U., and J. F. M. performed experiments. S. H., A. S., and J.F.M. analyzed data; 25
S. H., A. S., and J.F.M. wrote the manuscript; all authors discussed the results and 26
commented on the manuscript. 27
28
Funding information 29
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (JSPS 30
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on May 5, 2020, as DOI:10.1104/pp.20.00125
Copyright 2020 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
KAKENHI Grant Number 16H06296 to J.F.M.). 31
32
Abstract 33
Zinc is an important essential micronutrient for plants and humans; however, the exact 34
transporter responsible for root zinc (Zn) uptake from soil has not been identified. Here, 35
we found that OsZIP9, a member of ZIP (ZRT, IRT-like protein) family, is involved in 36
Zn uptake in rice under Zn-limited conditions. OsZIP9 was mainly localized to the 37
plasma membrane and showed transport activity for Zn in yeast. Expression pattern 38
analysis showed that OsZIP9 was mainly expressed in the roots throughout all growth 39
stages and its expression was up-regulated by Zn-deficiency. Furthermore, OsZIP9 was 40
expressed in the exodermis and endodermis of root mature regions. For plants grown in 41
a hydroponic solution with low Zn concentration, knockout of OsZIP9 significantly 42
reduced plant growth, which was accompanied by decreased Zn concentrations in both 43
the root and shoot. However, plant growth and Zn accumulation did not differ between 44
knockout lines and wild-type rice under Zn-sufficient conditions. When grown in soil, 45
Zn concentrations in the shoots and grains of knockout lines were decreased to half of 46
wild-type rice, whereas the concentrations of other mineral nutrients were not altered. 47
A short-term kinetic experiment with stable isotope 67Zn showed that 67Zn uptake in 48
knockout lines was much lower than that in wild-type rice. Combined, these results 49
indicate that OsZIP9 localized at the root exodermis and endodermis functions as an 50
influx transporter of Zn and contributes to Zn uptake under Zn-limited conditions in 51
rice. 52
53
Introduction 54
Zinc (Zn) is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and development (Marschner, 55
2012). Zn plays structural and catalytic roles in large number of proteins. However, Zn 56
deficiency is the most widely occurring micronutrient deficiency in crops worldwide, 57
which has been a limiting factor of crop production on millions of hectares of arable 58
land, especially in alkaline soil (Barker and Pilbeam, 2015). Furthermore, this 59
deficiency also results in Zn deficiency in humans because Zn in edible parts of crops 60
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
is our primary source of Zn intake. Therefore, it is important to understand the 61
molecular mechanisms of Zn transport and regulation in crops for enhancing crop 62
tolerance to Zn deficiency and preserving Zn accumulation in edible plant parts. 63
The predominant form of Zn in soil solution is the divalent cation (Zn2+) in most 64
soils, although it may be present as Zn(OH)+ at high pH. The transport of Zn from soil 65
to different organs and tissues have been proposed to be mediated by different 66
transporters such as members of the Zn-regulated transporter, iron-regulated 67
transporter-like proteins (ZIP; ZRT-IRT-related protein), yellow-stripe1-like (YSL) 68
family, heavy metal ATPases (HMA), cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) (Grotz et al., 69
1998; Guerinot, 2000; Sinclair and Krämer, 2012). Among them, several members of 70
the ZIP family have been implicated in uptake and transport of Zn. ZIP transporters 71
were first identified in yeast (ZRT1) and Arabidopsis (IRT) (Zhao and Eide, 1996; Eide 72
et al., 1996). Homologous ZIP proteins are present in many plant species. For example, 73
there are 15 members in Arabidopsis (Milner et al., 2013), 17 in rice (Oryza sativa) 74
(Chen et al., 2008 ), 14 in wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Evens et al., 2017), 12 in barley 75
(Hordeum vulgare) (Tiong et al., 2014), and 23 in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris 76
L.) (Astudillo et al., 2013). Most ZIP proteins have 309–470 amino acids and are 77
predicted to have eight trans-membrane domains and a similar membrane topology in 78
which the amino- and carboxy-terminal ends of the proteins are located on the outside 79
surface of the plasma membrane (Guerinot, 2000). Based on transport assays mainly in 80
yeast mutants, ZIP transporters show broad substrate transport activity; in addition to 81
transporting Zn and Fe, they also transport Mn, Cd, and Co, although some members 82
only transport Zn (Korshunova et al., 1999; Waters and Sankaran, 2011; Milner et al., 83
2013). The ZIP genes also show different expression patterns; some are only expressed 84
in the roots (Bughio et al., 2002; Ishimaru et al., 2006), whereas others are expressed in 85
different tissues (Ishimaru, et al., 2005; Yang et al. 2009; Lee et al., 2010a; Lee et al., 86
2010b; Kavitha et al., 2015; Sasaki et al., 2015). The response of ZIP genes to different 87
Zn concentrations differ between members, but most ZIP genes reported are 88
up-regulated by Zn-deficiency (Ishimaru et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2010a; Lee et al., 89
2010b; Yang et al. 2009; Kavitha et al., 2015). Furthermore, two basic-region 90
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
leucine-zipper (bZIP) transcription factors, bZIP19 and bZIP23, are reported to be 91
involved in regulation of ZIP expression (Assuncao et al., 2010; Inaba et al., 2015). 92
Rice is a staple food for half of the global population, and therefore it provides an 93
important source of dietary Zn intake in rice-eating populations. However, the 94
transport system of Zn in rice has not been well understood. Several ZIP members have 95
been functionally characterized in terms of transport activity, expression patterns, and 96
ectopic expression analysis. OsZIP1, OsZIP3, OsZIP4, OsZIP5, OsZIP7a, and OsZIP8 97
showed influx transport activity for Zn in yeast (Ramesh et al., 2003, Ishimaru et al., 98
2005; Yang et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2010a; Lee et al., 2010b; Tan et al., 2019). However, 99
OsZIP2 in yeast and OsZIP6 in Xenopus oocytes did not show transport activity for Zn 100
(Ramesh et al. 2003; Kavita et al., 2015). Rice ZIP genes also show different 101
expression patterns; OsZIP1, OsZIP4, OsZIP5, OsZIP6, OsZIP7a, and OsZIP8 are 102
expressed in both the roots and shoots (Ramesh et al., 2003; Ishimaru et al., 2005; 103
Kavitha et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2010a; Lee et al., 2010b), whereas 104
OsZIP3 is mainly expressed in the nodes (Sasaki et al., 2015). Furthermore, the 105
expression of OsZIP4, OsZIP5, OsZIP6, OsZIP7a, and OsZIP8 is up-regulated by 106
Zn-deficiency, whereas OsZIP1 and OsZIP3 are constitutively expressed (Suzuki et al., 107
2012; Sasaki et al., 2015). On the other hand, overexpression of OsZIP4 and OsZIP5 108
causes decreased Zn accumulation in the shoots, but increased Zn accumulation in the 109
roots (Ishimaru et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010a). Based on these findings, OsZIP1 has 110
been proposed to function in Zn uptake from soil (Ramesh et al. 2003, Bashir et al. 111
2012), whereas OsZIP4, OsZIP5, OsZIP7, and OsZIP8 are involved in Zn 112
translocation/distribution in the shoots (Ishimaru et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2010a; Lee et 113
al., 2010b; Sasaki et al., 2015; Tan et al., 2019). However, aside for OsZIP3, the exact 114
physiological roles of these ZIP genes in planta remain poorly understood. OsZIP3 115
localized in the node is responsible for the preferential distribution of Zn to developing 116
tissues (Sasaki et al. 2015). Here, we report on a previously uncharacterized rice ZIP 117
member, OsZIP9. Through detailed functional analyses, we found that OsZIP9 is a 118
transporter that contributes to Zn uptake in both Zn-limited hydroponic conditions and 119
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
in soil. 120
121 122
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
Results 123
Cloning of OsZIP9 124
According to the database (http://aramemnon.uni-koeln.de/), there are 15 members of 125
the ZIP family in rice (Supplemental Fig. S1A). We amplified the full-length coding 126
region of OsZIP9 (LOC_Os05g39540/Os05g0472400) by PCR from complementary 127
DNA (cDNA) of rice roots (cv Nipponbare). The primers used were designed 128
according to the Rice Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/). OsZIP9 is 129
composed of three exons and two introns (Supplemental Fig. S2) and encodes a protein 130
of 363 amino acids. OsZIP9 shares 23–52% identify with other ZIP members 131
(Supplemental Fig. S1B) and forms a separate clade from other ZIP members 132
(Supplemental Fig. S1A). Similar to other rice ZIP members, OsZIP9 protein was 133
predicted to have eight trans-membrane domains (TMHMM Server v. 2.0; 134
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) (Supplemental Figs. S1C and S2C). 135
136
Transport activity test of OsZIP9. 137
To examine whether OsZIP9 is able to transport Zn, we expressed it in Zn uptake–138
defective yeast cells (ZHY3) under control of the galactose-inducible promoter. A 139
time-course experiment with stable isotope 67Zn showed that in the presence of glucose 140
(no OsZIP9 expression) there was no difference in Zn accumulation (Δ67Zn) between 141
vector control and yeast expressing OsZIP9 (Fig. 1A). However, when the expression 142
of OsZIP9 was induced by the presence of galactose, yeast expressing OsZIP9 showed 143
much higher Δ67Zn compared with the empty vector control (Fig. 1B). 144
To examine the transport specificity of OsZIP9 for metals, we compared the 145
transport activity for Fe, Cu, and Zn using respective stable isotopes, specifically 67Zn, 146 65Cu, or 57Fe, in wild-type yeast cells (BY4741). In the presence of galactose, OsZIP9 147
transported only Zn and not Fe or Cu (Fig. 1C). 148
149
Expression pattern analysis of OsZIP9. 150
The expression pattern of OsZIP9 was investigated in plants grown in either soil or 151
nutrient solution by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In samples 152
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
derived from rice grown in the field, OsZIP9 was found to be mainly expressed in the 153
roots at all growth stages (Fig. 2A). In samples from hydroponically cultivated rice, the 154
expression of OsZIP9 in the roots was strongly induced by Zn-deficiency, but not by 155
Cu- or Mn-deficiency (Fig. 2B). OsZIP9 expression was also induced by Fe-deficiency, 156
but to a lesser extent. Time-dependent expression analysis showed that OsZIP9 157
expression was significantly up-regulated following 1 day and further increased 158
following 3 days of Zn deficiency (Supplemental Fig. S3A). However, 1 day of Fe 159
deficiency did not induce OsZIP9 expression, although expression induction was 160
observed following 3 days of Fe deficiency (Supplemental Fig. S3B). 161
We also investigated the spatial expression pattern of OsZIP9 in different root 162
regions. The expression of OsZIP9 was very low in the root tip region (0–0.5 cm from 163
the root tip) (Fig. 2C). However, higher expression was detected in root mature regions 164
(>1.0 cm). 165
166
Tissue specificity of OsZIP9 expression 167
To investigate the tissue specificity of OsZIP9 expression, we generated transgenic 168
lines carrying the promoter of OsZIP9 fused with GFP. Immunostaining using GFP 169
antibody showed that the signal was very weak in both the root tip (0.2 cm from the 170
root tip) and mature region (1.5 cm from the root tip) of plants supplied with Zn (Fig. 3, 171
A and D). However, in Zn-deficient roots, ZIP9 was strongly expressed at the 172
exodermis and endodermis of the root mature region (Fig. 3, E, G and H). The signal in 173
the root tip of Zn-deficient plants was also weak, which is consistent with the spatial 174
expression pattern of OsZIP9 (Fig. 2C). No signal was detected in wild-type plants 175
(Fig. 3, C and F), indicating the specificity of the antibody. 176
177
Subcellular localization of OsZIP9 178
Subcellular localization of OsZIP9 was investigated by transiently expressing a 179
GFP-OsZIP9 fusion in rice protoplasts and onion epidermal cells. In rice protoplasts 180
expressing GFP alone, the GFP signal was detected in the cytoplasm and nuclei 181
(Supplemental Fig. S4, A-D). However, in protoplasts expressing GFP-OsZIP9, the 182
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
GFP signal was mainly localized to the peripheral membrane of the cells, although 183
some signal was also detected in the endomembrane (Supplemental Fig. S4, E-H). 184
Similar results were obtained in onion epidermal cells (Supplemental Fig. S4, I-L). 185
To further confirm OsZIP9 subcellular localization, we performed double staining 186
using DAPI and an OsZIP9 antibody. In the roots of plants exposed to -Zn conditions 187
for 4 days, OsZIP9 was localized to the periphery of the cells, outside of the nuclei 188
stained by DAPI (Supplemental Fig. S4, M-P). No signal was detected in the knockout 189
line (Supplemental Fig. S4Q). Taken together, these results indicate that OsZIP9 is 190
most likely localized to the plasma membrane. 191
192
Phenotypic analysis of OsZIP9 knockout lines in hydroponic and soil culture 193
To investigate the role of OsZIP9 in Zn transport, we generated OsZIP9 knockout lines 194
by the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. We obtained two independent knockout lines with 195
different target positions (oszip9-1 and oszip9-2): one (oszip9-1) with a 1-bp deletion at 196
the first exon, and the other (oszip9-2) with a 1-bp insertion at the second exon 197
(Supplemental Fig. S2B). 198
We first grew the wild-type rice and two independent knockout lines in a nutrient 199
solution containing different Zn concentrations (0.02, 0.2, or 2 µM). At 0.02 µM Zn, 200
growth of the two knockout lines was obviously inhibited compared with wild-type 201
rice (Fig. 4A). New leaves showed typical Zn-deficiency symptoms in the knockout 202
lines, but not in the wild-type rice (Fig. 4D). The shoot fresh weight of the knockout 203
lines was 65% of the wild-type rice (Fig. 4E), although the root fresh weight did not 204
differ between different lines (Fig. 4F). However, at 0.2 and 2 µM Zn, growth was 205
similar between wild-type rice and the knockout lines (Fig. 4, B, C, E and F). 206
We then compared mineral element profiles in the roots and shoots of wild-type rice 207
and the knockout lines exposed to different Zn concentrations. At 0.02 µM Zn, both the 208
concentration and content of Zn in the roots and shoots were significantly lower in the 209
knockout lines than in wild-type rice (Fig. 5, A-D). At 0.2 µM Zn, shoot Zn 210
concentration and content were lower in the knockout lines than in wild-type rice, but 211
root Zn concentration and content were similar between different lines. However, Zn 212
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
concentration and content in both the roots and shoots of the different lines were 213
comparable at 2 µM Zn (Fig. 5, A-D). 214
There was no difference in the concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, P, Fe, Cu, and Mn in the 215
roots of wild-type rice and the knockout lines (Supplemental Figs. S5, A-D and S6, 216
A-C); however, the knockout mutants showed higher concentrations of Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, 217
and Mn in the shoots at 0.02 µM Zn, but not at 0.2 and 2.0 µM Zn (Supplemental Figs. 218
S5, E-F and S6, D-F). Moreover, the contents of these elements except Fe were similar 219
between the different lines at all Zn concentrations tested (Supplemental Figs. S7, E-F 220
and S8, D-F), indicating that the higher concentrations observed at 0.02 µM Zn were 221
caused by decreased growth. The shoot concentration and content of K were slightly 222
decreased in the knockout lines, whereas those of P were not altered compared with 223
wild-type rice (Supplemental Figs. S5, G-H and S7, G-H). 224
When grown in soil until maturity, the knockout lines accumulated less than half the 225
amount of Zn in wild-type rice in straw and brown rice grain (Fig. 6). However, the 226
concentrations of other elements, including Cu, Fe, and Mn, in straw and brown rice 227
were comparable between wild-type rice and the knockout lines, except that the 228
concentration of Mn in straw was slightly increased in the knockout lines compared 229
with wild-type rice (Fig. 6). We also compared accumulation of Cd and As in straw and 230
brown rice. No difference in the accumulation of these two toxic elements was found 231
in either straw or brown rice between wild-type rice and the OsZIP9 knockout lines 232
(Supplemental Fig. S9). Combined, these results indicate that OsZIP9 is a specific 233
transporter for Zn in rice roots. 234
235
Short-term uptake experiments with stable isotope 67Zn 236
To confirm whether Zn uptake was altered in the knockout lines, we performed a short 237
term (24 h) labeling experiment with stable isotope 67Zn. Following the exposure of 238
Zn-deficient plants to 0.4 µM 67Zn for 24 h, the OsZIP9 knockout lines accumulated 239
much less 67Zn (as ∆67Zn) in both the roots and shoots compared with wild-type rice 240
(Fig. 7A). The ∆67Zn uptake in the knockout lines was 41% of wild-type rice (Fig. 7B); 241
however, there was no difference in the root-to-shoot translocation of ∆67Zn between 242
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
the different lines (Fig. 7C). To confirm these results, we also used an OsZIP9 RNAi 243
line, which showed about 80% reduction in OsZIP9 expression compared wild-type 244
rice (Supplemental Fig. S10A). Similar to the knockout lines, the ∆67Zn concentration 245
in both the roots and shoots was lower in the RNAi line than in wild-type rice 246
(Supplemental Fig. S10B). The ∆67Zn uptake in the RNAi line was 66% of that in 247
wild-type rice (Supplemental Fig. S10C), whereas the root-to-shoot translocation was 248
similar between the RNAi line and wild-type rice (Supplemental Fig. S10D). 249
Furthermore, we performed a kinetic uptake experiment with 67Zn in Zn-deficient 250
plants at 4°C and 25°C. At 4°C, there was no difference in ∆67Zn uptake (30 min) 251
between wild-type rice and the knockout lines (Fig. 7D). However, at 25°C, the ∆67Zn 252
uptake was higher in wild-type rice than in the knockout lines, although the uptake 253
increased with increasing 67Zn concentrations in the nutrient solution in all lines (Fig. 254
7D). The net uptake of ∆67Zn calculated was significantly higher in wild-type rice than 255
in the knockout lines (Fig. 7E). Knockdown of OsZIP9 also significantly reduced the 256
net uptake of ∆67Zn (Supplemental Fig. S10E). Together, these results support that 257
OsZIP9 contributes to Zn uptake in rice roots. 258
259 260
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
Discussion 261
Based on analyses of expression pattern, transport activity in heterologous systems, 262
and ectopic expression, a number of transporters have been suggested to function in 263
root Zn uptake, such as AtZIP2, AtIRT1, and AtIRT3 in Arabidopsis (Vert et al., 2002; 264
Lin et al., 2009; Palmer and Guerinot, 2009; Milner et al., 2013); OsZIP1 and OsZIP3 265
in rice (Ramesh et al., 2003); and HvZIP7 in barley (Tiong et al., 2014). However, the 266
exact transporter for Zn uptake in roots has not been identified in plants (Olsen and 267
Palmgren, 2014). In the present study, we functionally characterized OsZIP9 in rice in 268
terms of growth stage- and organ-dependent expression pattern, subcellular 269
localization, transport activity in both yeast and knockout/knockdown lines, 270
tissue-specificity of localization, and detailed phenotypic analysis of knockout lines 271
growing in both nutrient solution and soil. We revealed that OsZIP9 contributes to Zn 272
uptake under Zn-limited conditions, especially in soil. This conclusion is supported by 273
several lines of evidence: 1) OsZIP9 is localized to the plasma membrane 274
(Supplemental Fig. S4); 2) OsZIP9 shows transport activity for Zn (Fig. 1); 3) OsZIP9 275
is mainly expressed in the roots through the whole growth period (Fig. 2A); 4) OsZIP9 276
expression is induced by Zn-deficiency (Fig. 2B); 5) OsZIP9 is expressed at the 277
exodermis and endodermis of mature root region (Figs. 2C and 3); 6) Knockout or 278
knockdown of OsZIP9 results in remarkably decreased Zn uptake at low Zn 279
concentration in nutrient solution, but not at high Zn concentrations (Figs. 5 and 7, 280
Supplemental Fig. S10); and 7) Knockout of OsZIP9 decreases Zn uptake from soil 281
(Fig. 6). 282
OsZIP9 showed transport activity for Zn in yeast, but not for Fe and Cu (Fig. 1). 283
Transport activity for Mn was not tested in yeast because a stable isotope of Mn was 284
not available. However, no difference in Mn accumulation was found between 285
wild-type rice and knockout lines of OsZIP9 (Supplemental Fig. S8). Furthermore, 286
OsNramp5 is reported to mediate Mn uptake in rice (Sasaki et al., 2012). Therefore, it 287
is unlikely that OsZIP9 contributes to Mn uptake. 288
Rice roots are characterized by two Casparian strips at both the exodermis and 289
endodermis (Enstone et al. 2002). Furthermore, mature roots have a highly developed 290
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
aerenchyma in which almost all of the cortex cells between the exodermis and 291
endodermis are destroyed. Therefore, rice has developed an efficient uptake system for 292
mineral elements, which is mediated by the cooperation of influx and efflux 293
transporters expressed at both the exodermis and endodermis of the root mature 294
regions (Yamaji and Ma, 2007; Sasaki et al. 2016, Mitani et al., 2018). Such uptake 295
systems for Si and Mn have been elucidated in rice roots (Ma et al., 2006; Ma, et al., 296
2007; Sasaki et al., 2012; Ueno et al., 2015). Si uptake is mediated by Lsi1 and Lsi2 297
(Ma et al., 2006; Ma et al., 2007), whereas Mn uptake is mediated by OsNramp5 and 298
OsMTP9 (Sasaki et al., 2012; Ueno et al., 2015), which are polarly localized at the 299
exodermis and endodermis of the roots. Expression of OsZIP9 at the exodermis and 300
endodermis in the root mature region supports its importance in Zn uptake (Figs. 2C 301
and 3). Since OsZIP9 likely functions as an influx transporter based on yeast transport 302
assay results (Fig. 1), an efflux transporter for cooperative Zn transport with OsZIP9 is 303
required for efficient Zn uptake, which remains to be identified in the future. 304
Knockout or knockdown of OsZIP9 resulted in decreased Zn uptake only under 305
Zn-limited conditions, but not under Zn-sufficient conditions in nutrient solution (Fig. 306
5, Supplemental Fig. S10), suggesting that OsZIP9 functions as a high-affinity 307
transporter for Zn. This is contrast to AtZIP9 and AtZIP12 in Arabidopsis, whereby 308
knockout of AtZIP9 and AtZIP12 only affects Zn uptake at high Zn concentrations and 309
not at low Zn concentrations (Inaba et a., 2015). In paddy soil, the Zn concentration in 310
soil solution is very low (Wang et al., 2019). In fact, OsZIP9 plays an important role in 311
Zn uptake from soil because knockout mutants of OsZIP9 exhibited significant 312
decreases in Zn accumulation in both the straw and brown rice under flooded 313
conditions (Fig. 6). This is also supported by higher expression of OsZIP9 under 314
flooded conditions compared to upland conditions (Wang et al., 2019). Since knockout 315
of OsZIP9 did not completely abolish Zn uptake even under Zn-limited conditions (Fig. 316
5), other unidentified transporters may also be involved in Zn uptake in rice. One 317
candidate is OsZIP1 because it is also highly expressed in the roots (Ramesh et al., 318
2003), although its exact role in Zn uptake remains to be examined. Furthermore, 319
transporters functioning at high Zn concentrations also require characterization in the 320
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
future. 321
The expression of OsZIP9 was also induced by Fe-deficiency to some extent, 322
although the extent of expression induction was not as high as that caused by Zn 323
deficiency (Fig. 2B). However, expression induction by Zn deficiency occurred earlier 324
than by Fe deficiency (Supplemental Fig. S3), suggesting that induction by Fe 325
deficiency was caused by indirect effects, although the exact mechanism is unknown. 326
In OsZIP9 knockout mutants, higher Fe accumulation in the shoots was observed at 327
low Zn supply in nutrient solution (Fig. 6). Since the mutant plants suffered from Zn 328
deficiency at low Zn concentrations (Figs. 4 and 5), some genes related to Fe uptake in 329
the roots may have been induced. However, in soil culture, knockout of OsZIP9 did not 330
affect Fe accumulation in the shoots (Fig. 6), due to high Fe concentration in soil 331
solution of paddy soil (Wang et al., 2019). 332
Identification of OsZIP9 in the present study provides further understanding of the 333
Zn transport system in rice. Zn in soil is first taken up by OsZIP9 localized at the 334
exodermis and endodermis of the roots and other uncharacterized transporters (Fig. 3). 335
Zn is partially sequestered by OsHMA3 localized at the tonoplast in root cells (Cai et 336
al., 2019) and the remaining Zn is translocated to the shoot by OsHMA2 localized at 337
the pericycle cells (Yamaji et al., 2013). OsZIP7 was also implicated in Zn xylem 338
loading although its exact role remains to be examined (Tan et al., 2019). At the node, 339
Zn is preferentially delivered to developing organs such as new leaves and grains by 340
OsZIP3 and OsHMA2. OsZIP3 is localized to xylem transfer cells in enlarged vascular 341
bundles (EVBs) of the nodes and responsible for unloading of Zn from the xylem of 342
EVB (Sasaki et al. 2015), whereas OsHMA2 is localized at the phloem region of both 343
EVBs and diffuse vascular bundles (DVBs) and is responsible for loading Zn to the 344
phloem of DVBs and EVBs (Yamaji et al. 2013). However, some missing transporters, 345
such as Zn efflux transporter(s) in root and node, remain to be identified in future 346
investigations to gain a holistic understanding of the Zn transport system in rice. This 347
will contribute to breeding rice cultivars with high tolerance to Zn deficiency that 348
exhibit high Zn accumulation in the grain. 349
In conclusion, OsZIP9 identified in this study is a transporter for Zn and it 350
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
contributes to root Zn uptake in soil. 351
352
Materials and methods 353
Plant materials and growth conditions 354
Seeds of the wild-type rice (cv. Nipponbare), two independent CRISPR/Cas9 OsZIP9 355
knockout lines (T2), one RNAi line, and transgenic lines (T2) carrying the promoter of 356
ZIP9 fused with GFP were soaked in water in dark at 30°C. After 2 days, the 357
germinated seeds were placed on a plastic net floating on a 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution in a 358
1.2-L plastic pot. The seedlings (7-d-old) were transferred to a 3.5-L plastic pot 359
containing 1/2 Kimura B solution (0.4 µM Zn, pH 5.6) (Ma et al., 2002). The nutrient 360
solution was exchanged every 2 days. All plants were grown in a controlled 361
greenhouse at 25–30°C, under natural light. 362
363
Cloning of full-length cDNA of OsZIP9 364
The full-length ORF of OsZIP9 was amplified by PCR using primers listed in 365
Supplemental Table S1, which were designed based on a putative cDNA clone 366
(Os05g0472400) in the Rice Annotation Project Database (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/) 367
with a putative translational start and stop site. Total RNA was extracted from rice 368
roots (cv. Nipponbare) using a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, 369
http://www.qiagen.com) and then converted to cDNA using the protocol supplied by 370
the manufacturer of ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA remover 371
(TOYOBO). The amplified cDNA was cloned into pGEM®-T vector (Promega, 372
https://www.promega.com/) and the sequence was confirmed by a sequence analyzer 373
(ABI Prism 3130; Applied Biosystems, http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/). 374
375
Phylogenetic analysis 376
The alignment was performed with ClustalW using default settings 377
(http://clustalw.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/), and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using the 378
neighbor-joining algorithm with MEGA version 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013). Bootstrap 379
support was calculated (1000 replications). 380
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
381
Transport activity assay of OsZIP9 382
The OsZIP9-pGEM constructed as above was introduced into pYES2 vector 383
(Invitrogen) through restriction sites of BamHI and XhoI under the control of 384
galactose-inducible promoter, followed by introducing into a wild-type yeast strain 385
(BY4741; MATa his2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0) or the Zn uptake defective double mutant 386
(ZHY3; MATa ade6 can1 his3 leu2 trp1 ura3 zrt1∷LEU2 zrt2∷HIS3). In a time-course 387
experiment, ZHY3 expressing OsZIP9 or empty vector were grown in the Sc(-Uracil) 388
medium containing 0.67% (w/v) yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco), 2% 389
(w/v) glucose, 0.2% (w/v) appropriate amino acid, and 2% (w/v) agar at pH 6.0 for 390
selection. The yeast cells were first incubated in Sc(-Uracil) liquid medium with 50 391
mM MES containing 2% (w/v) galactose or 2% (w/v) glucose (as a negative control) 392
for two hours, followed by washing three times with the sterilized milli-Q water. The 393
yeast cells were then exposed to a solution containing 5 µM of stable isotope 67ZnCl2 394
(97% enrichment, Taiyo Nippon Sanso, Tokyo, Japan). At 0, 20, 40, 60, and 120 395
minutes of incubation with shaking at 30°C, the yeast cells were harvested by 396
centrifugation (2300 g, 5 min). Yeast pellet was washed three times with 5 mM CaCl2 397
solution and then digested by 2 N HCl for the determination of metals as described 398
below. 399
To examine the transport activity for Zn, Fe, and Cu, the wild-type yeast cells 400
(BY4741) expressing OsZIP9 or empty vector were prepared as above and then 401
cultured for 4 hours in the presence of 2% (w/v) galactose for gene induction, followed 402
by exposure to a solution containing 5 µM of each stable isotope including 67ZnCl2 403
(97% enrichment), 65CuCl2 (99.7% enrichment), or 57FeCl2 (96.1% 57Fe). 57FeCl2 was 404
prepared from 57FeCl3 by reduction with ascorbic acid. These stable isotopes were 405
purchased from Taiyo Nippon Sanso (Tokyo, Japan). After incubation with shaking for 406
2 hours at 30°C, the yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation (2300 g, 5 min) and 407
subjected to determination of metals as described below. 408
409
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
Expression analysis of OsZIP9 410
To investigate the expression pattern of OsZIP9 in different organs at different growth 411
stage, we used the same cDNA samples collected in the field as described in Sasaki et 412
al. (2015). 413
To investigate the response of OsZIP9 expression in roots to metal deficiency, 414
20-d-old seedlings (cv. Nipponbare) were grown in the 1/2 Kimura B solution with or 415
without Mn, Fe, Cu, or Zn for three days. To further examine the time-dependent 416
response, seedlings (20-d-old) were exposed to -Fe or -Zn for 1 and 3 days and root 417
samples were taken for expression analysis as described below. 418
For spatial expression analysis, different root segments (0–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–1.5, 1.5–419
2.0, 2.0–2.5, and 2.5–3.0 cm from the root tip) were excised from the roots of 5-d-old 420
seedlings. 421
Samples taken were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then subjected to total 422
RNA extraction using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized by 423
ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (TOYOBO) or SuperScript II (Invitrogen) according to the 424
manufacturer’s instruction. The expression analysis of OsZIP9 was determined with 425
SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio Rad) or KOD SYBR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO) on a 426
real-time PCR machine (CFX384 or CFX96 (Bio-Rad)). Histone H3 and Actin were 427
used as internal controls. Relative gene expression was calculated by the ΔΔCt method. 428
The primer sequences used were listed in Supplemental Table S1. 429
430
Generation of transgenic rice lines 431
For generation of the transgenic lines carrying the promoter of ZIP9 fused with GFP, 432
the promoter region of OsZIP9 (3001 bp) was first amplified with PCR using the 433
primers shown in Supplemental Table S1. The amplified region was introduced into 434
the pGEM®-T easy vector. After confirmation of the sequence, the plasmid was 435
introduced into pPZP2H-lac vector including GFP by KpnI and BamHI, followed by 436
vector transfer to calluses (cv Nipponbare) via A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation 437
(Hiei et al., 1994). 438
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
OsZIP9 knockout lines were generated by using CRISPR/Cas9 using the plant 439
expression vector of Cas9 (pU6gRNA) and single guide RNA expression vector 440
(pZDgRNA_Cas9ver.2_HPT) as described before (Che et al., 2019). Twenty bases 441
upstream of the PAM motif were selected as candidate target sequences (Supplemental 442
Fig. S2A). Two targets of OsZIP9 were selected. The primers for target sequences in 443
the ORF region of OsZIP9 are listed in Supplemental Table S1. The derived constructs 444
were transformed into calluses as described above. 445
To genotype the resultant mutants, genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of 446
transgenic rice plants. PCR amplifications were carried out using primer pairs flanking 447
the designed target sites as listed in Supplemental Table S1. The PCR products (about 448
500 bp) were sequenced directly using internal specific primers, of which the binding 449
positions are desirably at about 200 bp upstream of the target sites. Two homologous 450
knockout lines without Cas9 were selected and the T2 generation was used in the 451
following phenotypic analysis. 452
An RNAi line was generated according to Miki and Shimamoto (2004) using the 453
primers listed in Supplemental Table S1. The expression level of OsZIP9 in the RNAi 454
line was investigated as described above. 455
Immunostaining analysis for transgenic lines carrying OsZIP9 promoter-GFP 456
To investigate the tissue-specificity of OsZIP9 expression, immunostaining was 457
performed in the transgenic lines (T2) carrying OsZIP9 promoter-GFP by using an 458
antibody against GFP (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Two-week-old plants grown in 1/2 459
Kimura B solution were exposed to a solution containing 0.4 µM Zn or not for 5 days. 460
Cross sections from the root tip (0.2 cm from the tip) and mature region (1.5 cm from 461
the root tip) were prepared and the method for immunostaining was the same as 462
described previously (Yamaji et al., 2007). The signal of fluorescence was observed 463
with a confocal laser scanning microscopy (TCS SP8x, Leica Microsystems). 464
465
Subcellular localization of OsZIP9 466
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
Subcellular localization of OsZIP9 was investigated by transiently expressing 467
GFP-OsZIP9 fusion into rice protoplasts and onion epidermal cells. The ORF of 468
OsZIP9 was amplified by PCR from rice (cv Nipponbare) root cDNA using primers 469
with the BsrGI and NotI site (Supplemental Table S1). The ORF was fused with a 470
linker (SSGSGG) and then inserted into the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S GFP vector 471
at the N terminus according to Sasaki et al. (2012). Rice protoplast transformation was 472
performed by the polyethylene glycol method as described previously (Chen et al., 473
2006). The same plasmid with DsRed was transformed into onion epidermal cells as 474
per the method described previously (Yokosho et al., 2016). The GFP signal was 475
observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS SP8x, Leica Microsystems). 476
We also performed double staining by using 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) 477
as a nuclei marker and an OsZIP9 antibody for further confirmation of the subcellular 478
localization. The synthetic peptide (DASSSHDHERGN) was used to immunize rabbits 479
to obtain antibodies against OsZIP9. The antiserum was purified through a peptide 480
affinity column. The roots of WT and the knockout line exposed to -Zn for 4 days were 481
used for the immunostaining. The method for immunostaining and secondary antibody 482
incubation were the same as described previously (Yamaji and Ma, 2007). The 483
fluorescence signal was observed through confocal laser scanning microscopy (TCS 484
SP8x, Leica Microsystems). 485
486
Phenotypic analysis of OsZIP9 knockout lines 487
The wild-type rice and two independent OsZIP9 knockout lines (T2, oszip9-1, oszip9-2) 488
generated by CRISPR/Cas9 were used for phenotypic analysis. In a hydroponic 489
solution, seedlings (19-d-old) grown in a 3.5-L plastic pot were transferred to a 1.2-L 490
plastic pot (one plant for each line) with a nutrient solution containing different Zn 491
concentrations; 0.02, 0.2, and 2 µM. The treatment solution was renewed every two 492
days. After 17 days, the plants were photographed. The roots were washed with 5 mM 493
CaCl2 three times and separated from the shoots. The fresh weight of the roots and 494
shoots were recorded. The concentrations of mineral elements in the roots and shoots 495
were determined as described below. 496
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
For soil culture, both wild-type rice and two independent knockout lines were grown 497
in a pot containing 3.5 kg soil collected from a field of the Institute of Plant Science 498
and Resources, Okayama University, under flooded conditions. Tap water was supplied 499
daily and a 2-cm water layer was maintained on the top soil. Plants were grown in a 500
temperature-controlled glasshouse (around 22–30°C) under natural light. At the 501
ripening stage, the plant was harvested and separated into straw and brown rice. The 502
concentrations of mineral elements were determined as described below. 503
504
Short-term uptake experiment with stable isotope 67Zn 505
Seedlings (WT, knockout lines, RNAi line) grown in 0.02 µM Zn for 17 days were 506
exposed to a solution containing 0.4 µM 67Zn. After 24 hours, the roots were washed 507
and separated from the shoots as described above. 508
A kinetic study of Zn uptake was performed by exposing the seedlings (WT, 509
knockout lines, RNAi line) grown in -Zn solution for 7 days to different 67Zn 510
concentrations in the range of 0–2 µM at 25°C and 4°C. After 30 min, the roots were 511
washed three times with 5 mM CaCl2 and harvested for element determination as 512
described below. 513
514
Determination of metals in plant and yeast samples 515
The roots and shoots were dried at 70°C for at least three days before being digested by 516
HNO3 (60%[w/v]) as described previously (Sasaki et al., 2012). The concentrations of 517
mineral elements in digestion solutions derived from plants and yeast were determined 518
by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS, 7700X; Agilent 519
Technologies). The concentrations of 67Zn, 65Cu, and 57Fe were determined with 520
isotope mode. ΔZn, ΔFe, and ΔCu (net Zn, Fe, or Cu increase) were calculated 521
according to Yamaji et al. (2013). 522
523
Statistical analyses 524
Statistical comparison by using SPSS 19 was performed by ANOVA followed by 525
Tukey-Kramer’s test. 526
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
527
Accession numbers 528
Accession number of OsZIP9 is registered as LC521921 in the GenBank/EMBL 529
databases. 530
531
Supplemental Data 532
Supplemental Figure S1. Sequence analysis of OsZIPs. 533
Supplemental Figure S2. Mutated sequences of OsZIP9 gene in CRISPR/Cas9 534
mutants. 535
Supplemental Figure S3. Time-dependent response of OsZIP9 to Zn- and 536
Fe-deficiency in the roots. 537
Supplemental Figure S4. Subcellular localization of OsZIP9. 538
Supplemental Figure S5. The concentrations of macro-elements in the roots and 539
shoots. 540
Supplemental Figure S6. Concentrations of Fe, Mn, and Cu in the roots and shoots. 541
Supplemental Figure S7. Contents of macro-elements in the roots and shoots. 542
Supplemental Figure S8. Contents of Fe, Mn, and Cu in the roots and shoots. 543
Supplemental Figure S9. Concentrations of Cd and As in straw and brown rice. 544
Supplemental Figure S10. Effect of knockdown of OsZIP9 on Zn uptake and 545
accumulation. 546
Supplemental Table S1. List of primers used in this study 547
548
Acknowledgements 549
We thank Akemi Morita and Sanae Rikiishi for their technical assistance. We also thank 550
Dr. Masaki Endo for providing pU6gRNA and pZDgRNA_Cas9ver.2_HPT for 551
generation of CRISPR/Cas9 lines. 552
553
Figure legends 554
555
Figure 1. Transport activity of OsZIP9 for metals in yeast cells. 556
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
(A-B) Time-dependent uptake of OsZIP9 for 67Zn in the presence of glucose (A) and 557
galactose (B). Zn uptake defective yeast cells (ZHY3) expressing OsZIP9 or empty 558
vector (VC) were exposed to a solution containing 5 µM 67Zn for different time periods. 559
(C) Transport activity for different metals. Wild-type yeast cells (BY4741) expressing 560
OsZIP9 or empty vector (VC) were exposed to a solution containing 5 µM of 67Zn, 57Fe, 561
or 65Cu for two hours in the presence of galactose. The concentration of stable metal 562
isotopes was determined by isotope mode of ICP-MS. ΔMetal was calculated by 563
subtracting the natural abundance of each metal isotope. Data are means ±SD of three 564
biological replicates. The asterisks indicate significant differences (*p<0.05 or**p<0.01 565
by T-test). All data were compared with VC in each part. 566
567
Figure 2. Expression pattern of OsZIP9. 568
(A) Growth stage- and organ-dependent expression of OsZIP9. Samples of various 569
organs were taken from rice grown in the field at different growth stages. (B) Response 570
of OsZIP9 expression to metal deficiency. Rice seedlings were grown in the 1/2 Kimura 571
B solution with or without Cu, Zn, Fe, or Mn for three days. (C) Spatial expression 572
pattern of OsZIP9 in roots. Different root segments (0–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–1.5, 1.5–2.0, 573
2.0–2.5, and 2.5–3.0 cm from the root tip) were collected from roots of 5-d-old 574
seedlings. The expression level of OsZIP9 was determined by RT-qPCR. Histone H3 (A, 575
B) and Actin (C) were used as internal controls. The expression relative to root at 6 576
weeks (A), control condition (B), and the root segment of 2.5–3.0 cm (C) are shown. 577
Data are means ±SD of three biological replicates. Statistical comparison was 578
performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. Different letters indicate 579
significant difference (p<0.01). 580
581
Figure 3. Tissue specificity of OsZIP9 expression. 582
Two-week-old plants of transgenic lines carrying the OsZIP9 promoter fused with 583
GFP were exposed to a solution containing Zn (A, D) or not (B, E) for 5 days. The 584
root cross sections from the root tip (0.2 cm from the tip) (A-C) and mature region (1.5 585
cm from the tip) (D-F) were prepared and used for immunostaining with an anti-GFP 586
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
antibody. (G, H) Magnified image of orange box area in (E). (C, F) Wild-type rice 587
roots as a negative control. Red color shows signal from the anti-GFP antibody and 588
blue color from auto fluorescence of cell wall. ex, exodermis; en, endodermis. Scale 589
bar, 25 µm. 590
591
Figure 4. Phenotypic analysis of OsZIP9 knockout lines in hydroponic solution. 592
(A-C) Phenotype of the wild-type rice and two OsZIP9 knockout lines (oszip9-1 and 593
oszip9-2). Scale bar, 10 cm. (D) Zn-deficiency symptom of new leaf. Scale bar, 2.5 cm. 594
(E-F) Fresh weight of shoots (E) and roots (F). The plants were grown in a nutrient 595
solution containing 0.02 (A, D), 0.2 µM (B) and 2 µM (C) Zn for 17 days. Data in E 596
and F are means ±SD of three biological replicates. Statistical comparison was 597
performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. Different letters indicate 598
significant difference (p<0.01). 599
600
Figure 5. Zn concentrations and contents in wild-type rice and OsZIP9 knockout lines. 601
(A-B) Zn concentrations in root (A) and shoot (B) of wild-type rice and knockout lines. 602
(C-D) Zn contents in the roots and shoots. The plants were grown in a nutrient solution 603
containing 0.02, 0.2, or 2 μM Zn for 17 days. Data are means ±SD of three biological 604
replicates. Statistical comparison was performed by ANOVA followed by 605
Tukey-Kramer’s test. Different letters indicate significant difference (p<0.01). All data 606
were compared with the wild-type rice in each treatment. 607
608
Figure 6. Comparison of metal accumulation between wild-type rice and two 609
independent OsZIP9 knockout lines grown in soil. 610
(A, B) Metal concentrations in the straw (A) and brown rice (B). Both the wild-type 611
rice and two independent OsZIP9 knockout lines were grown in soil under flooded 612
conditions until maturity. The concentration of different metals was determined by 613
ICP-MS. Data are means ±SD of three biological replicates. Statistical comparison was 614
performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. Different letters indicate 615
significant difference (p<0.01). All data for each element were compared with the 616
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
wild-type rice. 617
618
Figure 7. Short-term labeling experiment with 67Zn. 619
(A) Concentration of Δ67Zn in the roots and shoots. (B) Uptake of Δ67Zn. (C) Root to 620
shoot translocation of Δ67Zn. The wild-type rice and two independent OsZIP9 621
knockout lines grown in 0.02 μM Zn conditions for 17 days were exposed to a solution 622
containing 0.4 µM 67Zn for 24 h. (D-E) Kinetic study of 67Zn uptake. Seedlings grown 623
in Zn-deficient solution for 7 days were exposed to a solution containing different 624
concentrations of 67Zn for 30 min at 25°C or 4°C. Net uptake (E) was calculated by 625
subtracting the apparent uptake at 4°C from that at 25°C. Data are means ±SD of three 626
biological replicates. Different letters and asterisks indicate significant difference 627
(p<0.01). Statistical comparison was performed by ANOVA followed by 628
Tukey-Kramer’s test. 629
630
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
ΔZn c
onc. in
yeast (μg/g
DW
)
VC
OsZIP9
Time (min)
(A) (B)
(C)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
ΔZn c
onc. in
yeast (μg/g
DW
) VC
OsZIP9
Time (min)
**
**
** **
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
67Zn 57Fe 63Cu
VC (Gal)
OsZIP9 (Gal)
67Zn 57Fe 65Cu
ΔMetal conc. in
yeast (µ
g/g
DW
)
**
** *
Figure 1. Transport activity of OsZIP9 for metals in yeast cells.
(A-B) Time-dependent uptake of OsZIP9 for 67Zn in the presence of glucose (A) and galactose (B). Zn uptake defective yeast cells (ZHY3)
expressing OsZIP9 or empty vector (VC) were exposed to a solution containing 5 µM 67Zn for different time periods. (C) Transport activity
for different metals. Wild-type yeast cells (BY4741) expressing OsZIP9 or empty vector (VC) were exposed to a solution containing 5 µM of 67Zn, 57Fe, or 65Cu for two hours in the presence of galactose. The concentration of stable metal isotopes was determined by isotope mode of
ICP-MS. ΔMetal was calculated by subtracting the natural abundance of each metal isotope. Data are means ±SD of three biological
replicates. The asterisks indicate significant differences (*p<0.05 or**p<0.01 by T-test). All data were compared with VC in each part.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
OsZ
IP9
expre
ssio
n le
vel
Distance from root tip (cm)
(B) (C)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6 week 9 week
(Tilling)
12 week
(Booting)
14 week
(Flowering)
16 week
(Grain filling) O
sZ
IP9
expre
ssio
n level
(A)
15
25
35
45
55
OsZ
IP9
expre
ssio
n
0
2
4
6
Control -Zn -Fe -Mn -Cu
Treatment
C C
C
a
b
Figure 2. Expression pattern of OsZIP9.
(A) Growth stage- and organ-dependent expression
of OsZIP9. Samples of various organs were taken
from rice grown in the field at different growth
stages. (B) Response of OsZIP9 expression to metal
deficiency. Rice seedlings were grown in the 1/2
Kimura B solution with or without Cu, Zn, Fe, or
Mn for three days. (C) Spatial expression pattern of
OsZIP9 in roots. Different root segments (0–0.5,
0.5–1.0, 1.0–1.5, 1.5–2.0, 2.0–2.5, and 2.5–3.0 cm
from the root tip) were collected from roots of 5-d-
old seedlings. The expression level of OsZIP9 was
determined by RT-qPCR. Histone H3 (A, B) and
Actin (C) were used as internal controls. The
expression relative to root at 6 weeks (A), control
condition (B), and the root segment of 2.5–3.0 cm
(C) are shown. Data are means ±SD of three
biological replicates. Statistical comparison was
performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-
Kramer’s test. Different letters indicate significant
difference (p<0.01). www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
-Zn +Zn
en
ex
ex
en
(A) (C)
(D)
(B)
(E) (F)
(G) (H)
Figure 3. Tissue specificity of OsZIP9 expression.
Two-week-old plants of transgenic lines carrying the OsZIP9 promoter fused with GFP were exposed to a solution containing Zn (A, D)
or not (B, E) for 5 days. The root cross sections from the root tip (0.2 cm from the tip) (A-C) and mature region (1.5 cm from the tip) (D-F)
were prepared and used for immunostaining with an anti-GFP antibody. (G, H) Magnified image of orange box area in (E). (C, F) Wild-
type rice roots as a negative control. Red color shows signal from the anti-GFP antibody and blue color from auto fluorescence of cell wall.
ex, exodermis; en, endodermis. Scale bar, 25 µm.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0.02 µM Zn
WT oszip9-1 oszip9-2
0.2 µM Zn
WT oszip9-1 oszip9-2
2.0 µM Zn
WT oszip9-1 oszip9-2 WT oszip9-1 oszip9-2
0.02 µM Zn
a
a
a
b
a
a
b
a a
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0.02 0.2 2
Shoot
fresh w
eig
ht
(g)
Zn concentration (µM)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
(E)
0.02 0.2 2.0
(A) (B) (C) (D)
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a a
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.02 0.2 2
Root
fresh w
eig
ht
(g)
Zn concentration (µM)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
(F)
0.02 0.2 2.0
Figure 4. Phenotypic analysis of OsZIP9
knockout lines in hydroponic solution.
(A-C) Phenotype of the wild-type rice
and two OsZIP9 knockout lines (oszip9-1
and oszip9-2). Scale bar, 10 cm. (D) Zn-
deficiency symptom of new leaf. Scale
bar, 2.5 cm. (E-F) Fresh weight of shoots
(E) and roots (F). The plants were grown
in a nutrient solution containing 0.02 (A,
D), 0.2 µM (B) and 2 µM (C) Zn for 17
days. Data in E and F are means ±SD of
three biological replicates. Statistical
comparison was performed by ANOVA
followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test.
Different letters indicate significant
difference (p<0.01). www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
a
a
a
b
b
a
b
b
a
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.02 0.2 2.0
Shoot
Zn c
onc. (m
g/k
g D
W)
Zn concentration (µM)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2a
a
a
0
40
80
120
160
200
0.02 0.2 2.0
Root
Zn c
onc. (m
g/k
g D
W)
Zn concentration (µM)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
a a
b
a
b
a
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.02 0.2
(B) (A)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.02 0.2 2.0
Shoot
Zn c
ont. (
µg)
Zn pretreatment concentation (µM)
WToszip9-1oszip9-2
a b b
a
b b
a a
a
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.02 0.2 2.0
Root
Zn c
ont. (
µg)
Zn pretreatment concentation (µM)
WToszip9-1oszip9-2
a b b
a a a
a a
a
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0.02 0.2
a b b
a a a
(D) (C)
Figure 5. Zn concentrations and contents in wild-type rice and OsZIP9 knockout lines.
(A-B) Zn concentrations in root (A) and shoot (B) of wild-type rice and knockout lines. (C-D) Zn contents in the roots and shoots. The
plants were grown in a nutrient solution containing 0.02, 0.2, or 2 μM Zn for 17 days. Data are means ±SD of three biological replicates.
Statistical comparison was performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. Different letters indicate significant difference
(p<0.01). All data were compared with the wild-type rice in each treatment.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0
20
40
60
80
100
Zn Cu Fe Mn
Ele
men
t con
c. in
bro
wn r
ice
(mg
/kg D
W)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
b b
a
a ab b
a
a a
a a
a
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Zn Cu Fe Mn
Ele
men
t con
c. in
str
aw
(m
g/k
g D
W)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Zn Cu
b b a a a
b a
ab
b
a a
a a a
a
b b
a
(A) (B)
Figure 6. Comparison of metal accumulation between wild-type rice and two independent OsZIP9 knockout lines grown in soil.
(A, B) Metal concentrations in the straw (A) and brown rice (B). Both the wild-type rice and two independent OsZIP9 knockout lines were
grown in soil under flooded conditions until maturity. The concentration of different metals was determined by ICP-MS. Data are means
±SD of three biological replicates. Statistical comparison was performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. Different letters
indicate significant difference (p<0.01). All data for each element were compared with the wild-type rice.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0
5
10
15
20
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Net ∆
67Z
n c
onc. (m
g/k
g r
oot D
W)
67Zn concentration (µM)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
** **
**
**
**
**
**
**
a
b b
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
∆6
7Z
n u
pta
ke (
mg/k
g r
oot D
W)
a
a
b
b
b
b
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Root Shoot
∆6
7Z
n c
onc. (m
g/k
g D
W)
WT
oszip9-1
oszip9-2
(A) (B) (C)
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
∆6
7Z
n c
onc. (m
g/k
g r
oot D
W)
67Zn concentration (µM)
WT (25℃)
oszip9-1(25℃)
oszip9-2(25℃)
WT(4℃)
oszip9-1(4℃)
oszip9-2(4℃)
**
**
**
**
**
**
(4℃)
(4℃)
(25℃)
(25℃)
** **
(D) (E)
a a a
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
∆6
7Z
n r
oot to
shoot tr
anslo
cation (
%)
Figure 7. Short-term labeling experiment with 67Zn.
(A) Concentration of Δ67Zn in the roots and shoots. (B) Uptake of Δ67Zn. (C) Root to shoot translocation of Δ67Zn. The wild-type rice and two independent
OsZIP9 knockout lines grown in 0.02 μM Zn conditions for 17 days were exposed to a solution containing 0.4 µM 67Zn for 24 h. (D-E) Kinetic study of 67Zn
uptake. Seedlings grown in Zn-deficient solution for 7 days were exposed to a solution containing different concentrations of 67Zn for 30 min at 25°C or
4°C. Net uptake (E) was calculated by subtracting the apparent uptake at 4°C from that at 25°C. Data are means ±SD of three biological replicates.
Different letters and asterisks indicate significant difference (p<0.01). Statistical comparison was performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test.
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsAssunção AGL, Herrero E, Lin YF, Huettel B, Talukdar S, Smaczniak C, Immink RGH, van Eldik M, Fiers M, Schat H, Aarts MG (2010)Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 regulate the adaptation to zinc deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:10296–10301
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Astudillo C, Fernandez AC, Blair MW, Cichy KA (2013) The Phaseolus vulgaris ZIP gene family: identification, characterization, mapping,and gene expression. Front Plant Sci 4, 286
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ (2015) Zinc. In Handbook of Plant Nutrition. pp. 537-564. CRC pressPubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bashir K, Ishimaru Y, Nishizawa NK (2012) Molecular mechanism of zinc uptake and translocation in rice. Plant Soil 361:189–201Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bughio N, Yamaguchi H, Nishizawa NK, Nakanishi H, Mori S (2002) Cloning an iron‐regulated metal transporter from rice. J Exp Bot53:1677–1682
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai H, Huang S, Che J, Yamaji N, Ma JF (2019) The tonoplast-localized transporter OsHMA3 plays an important role in maintaining Znhomeostasis in rice. J Exp Bot 70: 2717–2725
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Che J, Yokosho K, Yamaji N, Ma JF (2019) A vacuolar phytosiderophore transporter alters iron and zinc accumulation in polished ricegrains. Plant Physiol 181: 276–288
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chen S, Tao L, Zeng L, Vega-Sanchez ME, Umemura K, Wang GL (2006) A highly efficient transient protoplast system for analyzingdefence gene expression and protein-protein interactions in rice. Mol Plant Pathol 7: 417–427
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chen WR, Feng Y, Chao YE (2008) Genomic analysis and expression pattern of OsZIP1, OsZIP3, and OsZIP4 in two rice (Oryza sativa L.)genotypes with different zinc efficiency. Russ J Plant Physiol 55: 400–409
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Eide D, Broderius M, Fett J, Guerinot ML (1996) A novel iron-regulated metal transporter from plants identified by functionalexpression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5624–5628
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Enstone DE, Peterson CA, Ma F (2002) Root endodermis and exodermis: structure, function, and responses to the environment. JPlant Growth Regul 21: 335–351
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Evens NP, Buchner P, Williams LE, Hawkesford MJ (2017) The role of ZIP transporters and group F bZIP transcription factors in the Zn-deficiency response of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant J 92: 291–304
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Grotz N, Fox T, Connolly E, Park W, Guerinot ML, Eide D (1998) Identification of a family of zinc transporter genes from Arabidopsisthat respond to zinc deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 7220–7224
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guerinot ML (2000) The ZIP family of metal transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta 1465:190-198Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium andsequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6: 271–282
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Inaba S, Kurata R, Kobayashi M, Yamagishi Y, Mori I, Ogata Y, Fukao Y (2015) Identification of putative target genes of bZIP19, atranscription factor essential for Arabidopsis adaptation to Zn deficiency in roots. Plant J 84: 323–334
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishimaru Y, Masuda H, Suzuki M, Bashir K, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2007) Overexpression of the OsZIP4 zinctransporter confers disarrangement of zinc distribution in rice plants. J Exp Bot 58: 2909-2915
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishimaru Y, Suzuki M, Kobayashi T, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2005) OsZIP4, a novel zinc-regulated zinctransporter in rice. J Exp Bot 56: 3207–3214
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishimaru Y, Suzuki M, Tsukamoto T, Suzuki K, Nakazono M, Kobayashi T, Wada Y, Watanabe S, Matsuhashi S, Takahashi M, NakanishiH, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2006) Rice plants take up iron as an Fe3+-phytosiderophore and as Fe2+. Plant J 45: 335–346
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kavitha PG, Kuruvilla S, Mathew MK (2015) Functional characterization of a transition metal ion transporter, OsZIP6 from rice (Oryzasativa L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 97:165–174
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Korshunova YO, Eide D, Clark WG, Guerinot ML, Pakrasi HB (1999) The IRT1 protein from Arabidopsis thaliana is a metal transporterwith a broad substrate range. Plant Mol Biol 40:37–44
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee S, Jeong HJ, Kim SA, Lee J, Guerinot ML, An G (2010a) OsZIP5 is a plasma membrane zinc transporter in rice. Plant Mol Biol 73:507–517
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee S, Kim SA, Lee J, Guerinot ML, An G (2010b) Zinc deficiency-inducible OsZIP8 encodes a plasma membrane-localized zinctransporter in rice. Mol Cells 29: 551–558
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin YF, Liang HM, Yang SY, Boch A, Clemens S, Chen CC, Wu JF, Huang JL, Yeh KC (2009) Arabidopsis IRT3 is a zinc‐regulated andplasma membrane localized zinc/iron transporter. New Phytol 182: 392–404
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ma JF, Tamai K, Ichii M, Wu GF (2002) A rice mutant defective in Si uptake. Plant Physiol 130: 2111–2117Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ma JF, Tamai K, Yamaji N, Mitani N, Konishi S, Katsuhara M, Ishiguro M, Murata Y, Yano M (2006) A silicon transporter in rice. Nature440: 688–691
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ma JF, Yamaji N, Mitani N, Tamai K, Konishi S, Fujiwara T, Katsuhara M, Yano M (2007) An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature448: 209–212
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Marschner P (2012) Zinc. In Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, pp. 212-223.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miki D, Shimamoto K (2004) Simple RNAi vectors for stable and transient suppression of gene function in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 45:490–495
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Milner MJ, Seamon J, Craft E, Kochian LV (2013) Transport properties of members of the ZIP family in plants and their role in Zn andMn homeostasis. J Exp Bot 64: 369–381
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mitani-Ueno N, Yamaji N, Ma JF (2018) Transport system of mineral elements in rice. In T Sasaki, M Ashikari, eds, Rice Genomics, www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Genetics and Breeding. Springer, Singapore, pp.223–240Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Olsen LI, Palmgren MG (2014) Many rivers to cross: the journey of zinc from soil to seed. Front Plant Sci 5:30Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Palmer CM, Guerinot ML (2009) Facing the challenges of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Nat Chem Biol 5: 333–340Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ramesh SA, Shin R, Eide DJ, Schachtman DP (2003) Differential metal selectivity and gene expression of two zinc transporters fromrice. Plant Physiol 133: 126–134
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sasaki A, Yamaji N, Ma JF (2016) Transporters involved in mineral nutrient uptake in rice. J Exp Bot 67: 3645–3653Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sasaki A, Yamaji N, Mitani-Ueno N, Kashino M, Ma, JF (2015) A node-localized transporter OsZIP3 is responsible for the preferentialdistribution of Zn to developing tissues in rice. Plant J 84: 374–384
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sasaki A, Yamaji N, Yokosho K, Ma JF (2012) Nramp5 is a major transporter responsible for manganese and cadmium uptake in rice.Plant Cell 24: 2155–2167
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sinclair SA, Krämer U (2012) The zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823: 1553–1567Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol BiolEvol 30: 2725–2729
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tan L, Zhu Y, Fan T, Peng C, Wang J, Sun L, Chen C (2019) OsZIP7 functions in xylem loading in roots and inter-vascular transfer innodes to deliver Zn/Cd to grain in rice. Biochem Biophy Res Commu 23:112–118
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tiong J, McDonald GK, Genc Y, Pedas P, Hayes JE, Toubia J, Langridge P, Huang CY (2014) HvZIP7 mediates zinc accumulation inbarley (Hordeum vulgare) at moderately high zinc supply. New Phytol 201: 131–143
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ueno D, Sasaki A, Yamaji N, Miyaji T, Fujii Y, Takemoto Y, Moriyama S, Che J, Moriyama Y, Iwasaki K, Ma JF (2015) A polarly localizedtransporter for efficient manganese uptake in rice. Nat Plants 1: 15170
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vert G, Grotz N, Dédaldéchamp F, Gaymard F, Guerinot ML, Briat JF, Curie C (2002) IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential for ironuptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell 14: 1223–1233
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang P, Yamaji N, Inoue K, Mochida K, Ma JF (2019) Plastic transport systems of rice for mineral elements in response to diverse soilenvironmental changes. New Phytol https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16335
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Waters BM, Sankaran RP (2011) Moving micronutrients from the soil to the seeds: genes and physiological processes from abiofortification perspective. Plant Sci 180:562-574
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yamaji N, Ma JF (2007) Spatial distribution and temporal variation of the rice silicon transporter Lsi1. Plant Physiol 143: 1306–1313Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yamaji N, Xia J, Mitani-Ueno N, Yokosho K, Ma JF (2013) Preferential delivery of zinc to developing tissues in rice is mediated by P- www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
type heavy metal ATPase OsHMA2. Plant Physiol 162: 927–939Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yang X, Huang J, Jiang Y, Zhang HS (2009) Cloning and functional identification of two members of the ZIP (Zrt, Irt-like protein) genefamily in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Biol Rep 36: 281–287
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yokosho K, Yamaji N, Mitani-Ueno N, Shen RF, Ma JF (2016) An aluminum-inducible IREG gene is required for internal detoxification ofaluminum in buckwheat. Plant Cell Physiol 57: 1169–1178
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhao, H, Eide, D (1996) The yeast ZRT1 gene encodes the zinc transporter protein of a high-affinity uptake system induced by zinclimitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2454–2458
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.