1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

download 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

of 7

Transcript of 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    1/7

    Building and Environment 37 (2002) 865871

    www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv

    Integrating CFD and building simulation

    M. Bartaka, I. Beausoleil-Morrisonb, J.A. Clarkec; , J. Denevd, F. Drkala, M. Laina,I.A. Macdonaldc, A. Melikove, Z. Popiolekf, P. Stankovd

    aTechnical University in Prague, Czech RepublicbCETC, Natural Resources Canada, Canada

    cESRU, University of Strathclyde, Scotland, UKd Technical University of Soa, Bulgaria

    eCIE Energy, Technical University of Denmark, DenmarkfSilesian Technical University at Gliwice, Poland

    Abstract

    To provide practitioners with the means to tackle problems related to poor indoor environments, building simulation and computational

    uid dynamics can usefully be integrated within a single computational framework.

    This paper describes the outcomes from a research project sponsored by the European Commission, which furthered the CFD modelling

    aspects of the ESP-r system. The paper summarises the form of the CFD model, describes the method used to integrate the thermal and

    ow domains and reports the outcome from an empirical validation exercise. ? 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Keywords: Building performance simulation; Computational uid dynamics; Integrated modelling; Empirical validation

    1. Introduction

    Within building energy simulation two modelling ap-

    proaches are extant: zonal networks and computational uid

    dynamics.

    Within the former method, as implemented within the

    ESP-r system [1], the building and its air handling plant are

    treated as a collection of nodes representing rooms (or parts

    of rooms), equipment connection points, ambient conditions

    etc. Inter-nodal connections are then dened to represent

    components such as cracks, doors, windows, fans, ducts and

    pumps. Each component is assigned a model that gives itsmass ow rate as a function of the prevailing pressure dif-

    ference. Consideration of the conservation of mass at each

    node leads to a set of non-linear equations that can be inte-

    grated over time to characterise the ow domain.

    Although well adapted for building energy application,

    the nodal network method is limited when it comes to

    consideration of indoor comfort and air quality: because

    momentum eects are neglected, intra-room air movement

    cannot be studied; and, as a result of the low resolution, local

    Corresponding author.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (J.A. Clarke).

    surface convection heat transfer is poorly represented. To

    overcome these limitations, it is necessary to conate CFD

    and building simulation. This paper describes the approach

    taken within the ESP-r system [2] and reports on the re-

    sults from an empirical validation exercise utilising a testing

    facility established at the Technical University in Prague.

    2. CFD modelling

    ESP-rs CFD model comprises seven coupled partial dif-

    ferential equations. The velocity distribution of the roomow is obtained from the three momentum equations corre-

    sponding to the three spatial axes. The continuity equation

    is modied to become a pressure correction equation which

    is then employed to obtain the pressure distribution by uti-

    lizing the well-known SIMPLEC algorithm [3]. Turbulence

    is accounted for by the standard version of the k turbu-

    lence model [4] together with appropriate treatments for the

    conditions at solid boundaries (as described later). A sep-

    arate transport equation for temperature distribution in the

    room is then introduced and is coupled with the velocity

    eld by means of the Boussinesq approximation. To enable

    equation solution, the room is subdivided into orthogonal

    0360-1323/02/$ - see front matter? 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

    PII: S 0 3 6 0 - 1 3 2 3 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 4 5 - 8

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    2/7

    866 M. Bartak et al./ Building and Environment 37 (2002) 865871

    control volumestypically between 30,000 and 100,000 in

    numberand the above-mentioned variables obtained nu-

    merically for each volume.

    The basic mathematical model has been rened in order

    to account for a number of practical problems relating to

    room indoor air quality and thermal comfort. A concentra-

    tion equation, governing the distribution of water vapour inthe room, has been added to determine the spatial variation

    of relative humidity as a function of any specied humid-

    ity source. A further concentration equation has been estab-

    lished to represent the distribution of carbon dioxide and is

    able to model occupant respiration under dierent metabolic

    rates.

    The freshness of the air at each grid is obtained through a

    local mean age of air parameter which denes the average

    time required for air to reach a given point after it enters

    the room [5]. The corresponding equation is derived from a

    method proposed by Sandberg and Sjoberg [6] and Davidson

    and Olsson [7]. In its nal form it is given by

    @

    @x

    u

    l+t

    t

    @

    @x

    +

    @

    @y

    v

    l+t

    t

    @

    @y

    + @

    @z

    w

    l+t

    t

    @

    @z

    = 1;

    where is the local mean age of air, u; v and w are the

    velocity components, the air density, ; t the physical

    and turbulent viscosity, andl; t the laminar and turbulent

    Schmidt numbers.

    Since it is important to accurately calculate the tempera-

    ture gradient in stratied ows arising, for example, in rooms

    with displacement ventilation, and because the basic math-

    ematical model has diculty in correctly accounting for the

    interaction between buoyancy and turbulence, the general-

    ized gradient diusion hypothesis (GGDH) model is used

    as introduced by Daly and Harlow [8]. This requires the in-

    troduction of a new production term for buoyancy, Pb, of

    the turbulent kinetic energy,k:

    Pb= 1

    T+ 273:150:15g

    k

    t

    @u

    @z +

    @w

    @x

    @T

    @x

    +t @v

    @z

    +@w

    @y@T

    @y

    + 2t@w

    @z

    2

    3

    k@T

    @z ;

    where g is the gravity acceleration acting along the z-axis

    andTthe air temperature (

    C).

    3. Integrating CFD and building simulation

    The solvers for the building thermal, HVAC, network

    air ow and CFD equations act co-operatively in the man-

    ner illustrated in Fig. 1. To ensure that the CFD turbu-

    lence model is appropriately congured at each time-step, a

    conation controller [9] is introduced in order to improve

    the simulation accuracy [10]. At the start of a time-step,

    the zero-equation turbulence model developed by Chen and

    Xu [11] is employed in investigative mode to determine

    the likely ow regimes at each surface. The eddy viscosity

    distribution to result is then used to initialise the k and

    elds and a second simulation performed for the time-step.

    This process repeats at each computational time-step.The nature of the ow at each surface is evaluated from

    the local Grashof (Gr) and Reynolds (Re) Numbers as de-

    termined from the investigative simulation. The Grashof

    Number (the ratio of the buoyancy and viscous forces) indi-

    cates how buoyant the ow is adjacent to the surface, while

    the Reynolds Number (the ratio of the inertial and viscous

    forces) indicates how forced is the ow. The following con-

    ditions are relevant:

    Gr=Re21: forced convection eects overwhelm free

    convection;

    Gr=Re21: free convection eects dominate;

    Gr Re2: both forced and free convection eects are

    signicant.

    Based on the outcome from the above condition test at each

    surface in the CFD model, the following procedure is in-

    voked.

    Where buoyancy forces are insignicant overall, the

    buoyancy term in the z-momentum equation is dropped to

    improve solution convergence.

    For a surface where free convection predominates, the

    log-law wall functions are replaced by functions developed

    by Yuan et al. [12] and a Dirichlet 1boundary condition im-

    posed where the surface is vertical; otherwise a convectioncoecient correlation is prescribed and a Neumann (see

    footnote 1) boundary condition imposed (this means that

    the thermal domain will inuence the ow domain but not

    the reverse).

    For a surface where convection is mixed, the log-law wall

    functions are replaced by a prescribed convection coecient

    and a Robin (see footnote 1) boundary condition imposed.

    For a surface where forced convection predominates, the

    ratio of the eddy viscosity to the molecular viscosity (t=),

    as determined from the investigative simulation, is examined

    to determine how turbulent the ow is locally:

    t=6 30: the ow is weakly turbulent; the log-law wall

    functions are replaced by a prescribed convection coe-

    cient and a Neumann boundary condition is imposed;

    t= 30: the log-law wall functions are retained and a

    Dirichlet boundary condition is imposed.

    The iterative solution of the ow equations is initiated for

    the current time-step. For surfaces where hc correlations are

    1 Dirichlet conditionxed temperature = s; Neumann condition

    xed heat ux k(@=@n) = q; Robin conditionheat ux proportional to

    the local heat transferk(@=@n) = hc( s).

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    3/7

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    4/7

    868 M. Bartak et al./ Building and Environment 37 (2002) 865871

    Fig. 2. Coupling network ow and CFD models.

    also that iteration may be invoked to resolve problematic

    couplings between domains.

    It is also possible to operate on the basis of partially

    matched schemes. For example, the building model might

    comprise of several zones, with only a subset addressed by

    CFD. At the same time, a ow network may be linked to one

    or more CFD domains, have nodes in common with some,

    but not all, of the other zones comprising the building model

    and have extra nodes to represent zones and=or plant compo-

    nents that are outwith the modelled building portion. Each

    part of such a model would then operate on the basis of best

    available information (e.g. a zone with no matched air ow

    model would utilise its user-specied inltration=ventilation

    rates).

    4. Empirical validation

    To test the new CFD model as installed within ESP-r,

    a laboratory facility was designed and built. The test room

    allows control of its boundaries via surface mounted heat-

    ing and cooling panels and by encapsulating it within an

    outer room whose environmental condition can be sepa-rately controlled. Finally, the size and=or position of the

    room inlet=outlet openings can be modied and the inlet air

    condition varied via a dedicated HVAC system.

    A series of experiments were conducted correspond-

    ing to isothermal mixing ventilation and non-isothermal

    displacement ventilation and the following data

    collected:

    1. the distribution of the local mean age of air (isothermal

    case);

    2. the air temperature distribution (non-isothermal case);

    3. room comfort parameters (non-isothermal case).

    The distribution of the local mean age of air param-

    eter was measured using the tracer-gas concentration

    decay method, while the vertical air temperature pro-

    les were measured with multi-point probes using NTC

    thermistors. The mean air velocity, the standard de-

    viation of velocity uctuations, the turbulence inten-

    sity and the draught rating were all measured by a

    multi-channel low velocity anemometer. Details on

    the experimental set-up have been reported elsewhere

    [1618].

    4.1. LMA test result

    Two 3D CFD models with a coarse (1089 control vol-

    umes) and a ne grid (24,300 control volumes) were com-

    pared with the experimental data. Fig. 3 shows the results.

    As can be seen, the predictions are up to 20% higher than

    the measurements: a result that is consistent with results

    obtained by some researchers (e.g. [19]) and better than

    those obtained by others (e.g. [7]). Possible reasons for

    the discrepancy include the so-called repeatability deviation

    (6.5%), the experimental accuracy (5%), the uncertainty in

    determining the volume of the test room (5%) and the use

    of mean velocities within the CFD model in place of instan-

    taneous values.

    The ne and course grids produce comparable results,

    with the former, as expected, being closer to the experimen-

    tal data. That said, the results from the coarse grid gave suf-

    cient accuracy for the case studied (mixing ventilation, a

    single air supply=extract and isothermal conditions).

    4.2. Buoyancy test result

    This test assessed the results corresponding to the use of

    the standard and improved forms of the k model when

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    5/7

    M. Bartak et al./ Building and Environment 37 (2002) 865871 869

    Fig. 3. Comparisons between predicted and measured local mean age of air.

    Fig. 4. Comparisons between predicted and measured temperature proles.

    applied to buoyant ows. The improved k model was

    based on the generalized gradient diusion hypothesis. The

    results from 3D computations are compared with the mea-

    sured vertical temperature proles as shown in Fig. 4.

    The numerical results show good agreement except for

    locations close to the oor where the adiabatic condition

    was not maintainable within the experimental set-up. For

    all other locations the agreement is within the measurement

    uncertainty (0:5

    C). The improved k model performed

    better than the standard model in terms of both convergence

    speed and the prediction of the temperature distribution.

    4.3. Comfort test result

    Measurements were performed using a Dantec multi-

    channel low velocity anemometer. The comparison with

    predictions is given in Table 1. The air mean velocity and

    temperatures show good agreement for all measured points,

    with any dierences being within the measurement accu-

    racy (0:03 m=s and 0:5

    C, respectively). The standard

    deviation of velocity uctuations and turbulence intensity

    show disagreement at locations where the anemometer is

    outwith its recommended range of operation (i.e. where the

    mean velocity falls below 0:05 m=s). At these points, the

    anemometer uncertainty is high, while the numerical model

    is likely to overestimate the turbulence kinetic energy yield-

    ing values of turbulence intensity that are too high. On the

    other hand, at low mean velocities there will be no discom-

    fort sensation (the draught rating is dened to be zero for

    mean velocities below 0:05 m=s). At the locations where the

    mean velocities are higher then 0:05 m=s (here close to the

    oor), the agreement between the measured and simulated

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    6/7

    870 M. Bartak et al./ Building and Environment 37 (2002) 865871

    Table 1

    Predicted vs. measured parameters related to comfort

    Parameter Measured Predicted

    Measurement position: X = 1:340 m; Y= 1:8 m

    h (m) 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.1 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.1

    w (m=s) 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.57 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.54

    STD (m=s) 0.007 0.005 0.012 0.109 0.044 0.051 0.058 0.100TI (%) 19.3 17.4 28.8 19.1 92.2 161.2 157.3 18.5

    T (

    C) 23.7 23.6 23.4 20.0 24.0 23.9 23.8 20.2

    DR (%) 0 0 0 66.8 0 0 0 60.5

    Measurement position: X = 2:818 m; Y= 1:8 m

    h (m) 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.1 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.1

    w (m=s) 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.30 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.27

    STD (m=s) 0.003 0.003 0.011 0.091 0.052 0.061 0.075 0.086

    TI (%) 9.5 9.7 21.8 30.3 159.5 180.7 280.5 32.3

    T (

    C) 23.8 23.6 23.0 21.2 23.9 23.8 23.4 21.7

    DR (%) 0 0 0 35.1 0 0 0 30.0

    h= height; w= mean velocity; STD = standard deviation of velocity uctuations; TI = turbulence intensity; T= temperature; DR = draught rating.

    data is good after the measurement uncertainty is taken into

    account [20].

    The rened ESP-r system was also tested by comparing

    predictions with physical measurements within an apartment

    building located within a multi-storey block of ats in the

    urban area of Gliwice in Poland. The apartment employed

    a natural ventilating system via individual ducts connecting

    each at with outlets on the roof. A system of four indepen-

    dent electric heaters was used to heat the at. Power con-

    sumption and indoor air temperatures were monitored along

    with the local climate parameters (barometric pressure, out-

    door air temperature, wind speed=direction and solar radia-tion).

    In order to determine the air change rate, the tracer gas

    concentration decay method was employed. The air change

    rates were measured 15 times under two dierent air tight-

    ness condition: for tight windows and for leaky windows.

    During the experiment, the weather spanned a wide range

    of conditions.

    Comparison of the simulation results with the energy con-

    sumption measurements showed good agreement in relation

    to global heat demand and inltration: the relative error in

    the former case not exceeding 14%. For the air inltration

    prediction there was also a good agreement with the mea-

    surements. Details are given in [21].

    5. Output possibilities

    On the basis of the multi-variate outputs from an inte-

    grated simulation, the spatial and temporal variation of in-

    door air quality and thermal discomfort may be assessed

    according to relevant standards (e.g. ASHRAE 62-1989,

    prENV 1752, ISO EN 7730 and ANSI=ASHRAE 55-1992).

    Such assessments might typically be based on indicators

    such as

    the variation in vertical air temperature between oor and

    head height;

    the absolute temperature of the oor;

    radiant temperature asymmetry;

    unsatisfactory ventilation rate;

    unsatisfactory CO2 level;

    local draught rating index assessed from the coupled in-

    uence of air speed, air temperature and turbulence inten-

    sity distribution;

    additional air speed required to o-set an elevated tem-perature;

    thermal comfort assessment based on PMV, PPD and ef-

    fective temperature indices;

    local mean age of air.

    Fig. 5 shows some typical CFD outputs showing the dis-

    tribution of velocity, temperature, draught rating and air

    mean age for dierent 2D room slices. Taken together, such

    performance indicators allow indoor environments to be as-

    sessed in terms of the spatial and temporal variation of the

    quality and comfort.

    6. Conclusions

    The CFD module of the ESP-r integrated modelling pack-

    age has been rened as part of a collaborative research

    project funded by the European Commission with inputs

    from related projects. These renements were concerned

    with the treatment of complex geometries, blockages (fur-

    nishings, equipment etc), buoyancy, ventilation openings,

    surface heat transfer and the assessment of the spatial and

    temporal variation of thermal comfort and indoor air quality.

  • 8/11/2019 1-s2.0-S0360132302000458-main

    7/7

    M. Bartak et al./ Building and Environment 37 (2002) 865871 871

    Fig. 5. Some typical CFD outputs.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are indebted to the European Commission for

    their invaluable support.

    References

    [1] Clarke JA, Hensen JLM. An approach to the simulation of coupled

    heat and mass ows in buildings. Indoor Air 1991;3:28396.

    [2] Clarke JA. Energy simulation in building design, 2nd ed. London:

    Butterworth Heinemann, 2001.

    [3] Van Doormal JP, Raithby GD. Enhancements of the simple method

    for predicting incompressible uid ows. Numerical Heat Transfer

    1984;7:14763.

    [4] Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent

    ows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

    1974;3:26989.

    [5] Liddament M. A review of ventilation eciency. AIVC Technical

    Note 39, 1993.[6] Sandberg M, Sjoeberg M. The use of moments for assessing

    air quality in ventilated rooms. Building and Environment

    1983;18(4):18197.

    [7] Davidson L, Olsson E. Calculation of age and local purging ow

    rate in rooms. Building and Environment 1987;22(2):11127.

    [8] Daly BJ, Harlow FH. The generalized gradient diusion hypothesis.

    Physics of Fluids 1970;13:2634.

    [9] Beausoleil-Morrison I. The adaptive coupling of heat and air ow

    modelling within dynamic whole-building simulation. Ph.D. thesis,

    University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 2000.

    [10] Beausoleil-Morrison I, Clarke J. The implications of using the

    standard k turbulence model to simulate room air ows which are

    not fully turbulent. Proceedings of ROOMVENT 98, Stockholm,

    1998. p. 99106.

    [11] Chen Q, Xu W. A zero-equation turbulence model for indoor airow

    simulation. Energy and Buildings 1998;28(2):13744.

    [12] Yuan X, Moser A, Suter P. Wall functions for numerical simulation

    of turbulent natural convection along vertical plates. International

    Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 1993;36(18):447785.

    [13] Negrao COR. Conation of computational uid dynamics and

    building thermal simulation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde,Glasgow, 1995.

    [14] Clarke JA, Dempster WM, Negrao C. The implementation of

    a computational uid dynamics algorithm within the ESP-r

    system. Proceedings of Building Simulation 95, Madison, 1995.

    p. 166 75.

    [15] Denev JA. Boundary conditions related to near-inlet regions

    and furniture in ventilated rooms. Proceedings of Application of

    Mathematics in Engineering and Business, Institute of Applied

    Mathematics and Informatics, Technical University, Soa, 1995.

    p. 2438.

    [16] Bartak M, Cermak R, Clarke JA, Denev J, Drkal F, Lain M,

    Macdonald IA, Majer M, Stankov P, Experimental and numerical

    study of local mean age of air. Proceedings of Building Simulation,

    Rio de Janeiro, 2001.

    [17] Stankov P, Denev J, Bartak M, Drkal F, Lain M, Schwarzer J,Zmrhal V. Experimental and numerical investigation of temperature

    distribution in room with displacement ventilation. Proceedings

    Clima, Napoli, 2000.

    [18] Melikov A. Integrated Design Optimization of Building Energy

    Performance and Indoor Environment. Final Report for Project ERB

    IC15 CT98 0511, European Commission, 2001.

    [19] Roos A. On the eectiveness of ventilation. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven

    University of Technology, 1999.

    [20] Melikov A. Accuracy of Draught Measurement Final Report for

    Project SMT4-CT97-2172, European Commission, 2000.

    [21] Baranowski A, Popiolek Z, Blaszczok M. Tests of the air change in

    a at with the method employing of tracer gas concentration decay.

    Proceedings of Application of Fluid Mechanics in the Environmental

    Engineering and Protection, Gliwice-Wisla, 2001 [in Polish].