1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

download 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

of 13

Transcript of 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    1/13

    Rheology, flow behaviour and heat transfer of ice slurries:

    a review of the state of the art

    V. Ayel, O. Lottin*, H. Peerhossaini

    Laboratoire de Thermocinetique, CNRS UMR 6607, Ecole Polytechnique de lUniversite de Nantes, BP 50609, 44306 Nantes, France

    Received 25 October 2001; received in revised form 23 February 2002; accepted 26 February 2002

    Abstract

    This paper reviews recent studies on rheology, flow behaviour and heat transfer of two-phase aqueous secondary

    refrigerants (ice slurries). The difficulties in measuring their rheological properties for which standard rheometers prove

    to be poorly adapted are analysed. Special attention is paid to vane-in-cup rheometers, which can make it possible to

    determine the yield stress. Pressure losses in cylindrical tubes have been measured by many authors. Even if the results

    generally agree with two-phase flow theory, divergences in sensitivity to the solid fraction can be observed. The strati-

    fication observed by some authors for small-Reynolds-number flows and its effects on the pressure drop are addressed.

    In a last part, information concerning numerical values of the heat transfer coefficient of ice slurries are summarized.

    Heat transfer coefficients depend on many parameters, but are largely influenced by the flow regime. A geometry of

    heat exchanger is then proposed, which has already been effective for single-phase flows, and which may enhance heat

    transfer in ice slurry flows.# 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Two-phase secondary refrigerant; Ice slurry; Rheology; Heat transfer; Pressure loss; Survey

    Rhe ologie, pertes de charge et transferts de chaleur des coulis

    de glace : une revue de le tat de lart

    Re sume

    Cet article passe en revue des etudes recentes concernant la rheologie, le comportement des ecoulements et le transfert

    thermique des frigoporteurs diphasiques aqueux (coulis de glace). Les difficultes de mesure des proprietes rheologiques,

    pour lesquelles des rheome`tres courants save`rent mal adaptes, sont analysees. Une attention particulie`re est portee sur lesrheome`tres du type vane-in-cup qui permettent de determiner la contrainte seuil dun materiau. Les pertes de charge

    lineaires dans des canalisations cylindriques ont ete mesurees par de nombreux auteurs. Meme si les resultats sont

    generalement conformes a` la theorie des ecoulements diphasiques, on peut observer des divergences quant a` la sensibilite a`

    la concentration en glace. La stratification, observee par quelques auteurs pour des ecoulements a` faible nombre de Rey-

    nolds, et ses effets sur la chute de pression sont etudies. Dans une dernie`re partie, les valeurs numeriques du coefficient de

    transfert thermique des coulis de glace sont recapitulees. Les coefficients de transfert thermique dependent de nombreux

    0140-7007/03/$20.00 # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.

    P I I : S 0 1 4 0 - 7 0 0 7 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 1 6 - 6

    International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107

    www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrefrig

    * Corresponding author. Tel.: +33-240-683-153; fax: +33-240-683-141.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (O. Lottin).

    http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrefrig/a4.3dmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrefrig/a4.3d
  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    2/13

    parame`tres, mais sont fortement influences par le regime decoulement. Nous proposons enfin un type dechangeur de

    chaleur, dont lefficacitea deja` eteremarquee pour des ecoulements monophasiques, et il pourrait saverer tout a` fait adapte

    a` des ecoulements de coulis de glace. # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.

    Mots cles : Caloporteur diphasique ; Coulis ; Rhe ologie ; Transfert de chaleur ; Chute de pression ; Base de donne es ; Enquete

    1. Introduction

    Cold distribution by means of secondary refrigerant is

    an alternative solution to direct expansion systems,

    which require large quantities of refrigerant. Ice slurries

    exploit the latent heat of ice and are much more efficient

    heat carriers than single-phase fluids; their high apparent

    heat capacity results in lower mass flow rates and tem-

    perature changes. Also, they are suitable for cold storage.

    However, because of the presence of solid particles within

    the carrying fluid, the flow of slurries is highly constrained.

    It is thus necessary to determine the rheological nature of

    these fluids for a better flow control in distribution plants.

    At the present state of the art, the data and opinions ofdifferent authors are often divergent, so that reliable

    conclusions on the rheology and flow behaviour of ice

    slurries are difficult to draw. However, the technological

    advantages of ice slurries and their potential economic

    impact are great enough to warrant a critical review of

    past work, the suggestion of new research areas, and the

    search for new design geometries.

    This paper first focuses on the rheology of the liquid

    ice mixtures and assesses recent studies on ice slurries.

    In the second part we address the flow and pressure

    losses of slurries in cylindrical pipes by examining some

    previous work on the subject. Then, the stratification

    phenomenon observed by some authors for small-Rey-

    nolds-number flows and its effects on pressure drops are

    treated. In the last part we study the numerical values

    and the evolutions of the heat transfer coefficients in

    rectilinear cylindrical type geometries and we propose a

    promising design geometry that enhances transport

    phenomena between the ice slurries and a solid wall.

    2. Rheological behaviour of ice slurries

    Liquidsolid mixtures are often considered as non-

    Newtonian; Table 1 gives examples of non-Newtonian

    models that can be used to characterise slurries. Itshould be noted that some of these models could be

    satisfactory on a restricted range of shear rates but

    completely inappropriate on wider ranges.

    Common to most of these models is a yield stress

    below which no flow is observed. The value of the yield

    stress depends strongly on the solid particle fraction:

    Nguyen and Boger [1] suppose that the yield stress is

    linked to the interaction and attraction among particles,

    giving rise to structures larger than the primary crystals;

    the yield stress then represents the breaking limit of these

    structures. Similarly, Barnes [2] suggests that the yield

    stress is a consequence of microstructural reorganization

    Nomenclature

    C thermal conductivity (W m1 K)

    d particle diameter (m)

    D tube diameter (m)

    f friction factor

    Fr Froude number

    Gz Graetz number

    h heat transfer coefficient (W m2 K)

    H height of the vane (m)

    He Hedstrom number

    K constant of proportionalityL tube length (m)

    n power index

    Nu Nusselt number

    Pr Prandtl number

    Re Reynolds number

    T torque (N m)

    V velocity (m s1)

    xs mass fraction of solids (wt.%)

    :

    shear stress (s1)

    P pressure drop (Pa)

    l specific heat (J kg1 K1)

    viscosity (Pa s)

    density (kg m3)

    shear rate (Pa)

    0 yield stress (Pa)

    s volume fraction of solids (%)

    Subscripts

    ai antifreeze (initial value)b Bingham

    c Casson

    D-B DittusBolter

    exp experimental

    m average (for solidliquid mixture)

    MAX maximum

    s solid

    w water-antifreeze (fluid)

    96 V. Ayel et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    3/13

    in the stagnant mixture into a structure allowing flows.

    In spite of this, the real definition of the yield stress isstill a subject of discussion. For instance, the Bingham

    model can lead to an overestimation of the yield stress if

    not properly used. One sees in Fig. 1 that if a nonlinear

    shear stress and shear rate behaviour is represented by a

    linear function f :

    , then the apparent yield stress is

    higher than its real value. The yield stress cannot be con-

    sidered as a fundamental property of the material as long

    as its value depends on the model or on the viscometer [1].

    3. Measurement of the rheological properties of ice slurries

    Rheological measurements with ice slurries require

    significant care, making experimentation difficult. There

    are many reasons for these difficulties; some specific to

    ice slurries and some linked to the general features of

    liquidsolid mixtures:

    frictions generated by the apparatus during

    rheological measurement will induce warming of

    the sample and modification of its ice content;

    the low viscosity of the carrying fluid requires

    small gap to allow accurate measurements; on

    the other hand, the relatively large ice crystals

    (from 10 mm to a few hundred mm) require muchlarger gap;

    the stratification of solid particles, according to

    their shape and size, does not permit to keep

    samples homogeneous;

    end effects (stresses on surfaces that ideally should

    not be considered in measurement) are not easy to

    take into account in stress-field calculations;

    glides between solid particles and wall, or even

    within the tested material, may significantly

    complicate measurements.

    The carrying fluid in ice slurries can generally beconsidered as Newtonian, as can slurries themselves if

    the ice mass fraction remains low. Authors are in good

    agreement that the ice mass fraction limit separating

    Newtonian and non-Newtonian behaviours is between 6

    and 15% (Table 2). Christensen and Kauffeld [5] propose

    a correlation for apparent viscosity:

    w 1 2:5s 10:052s 0:00273exp16:6s

    1

    Many authors attempted to reduce or suppress stratifi-

    cation in ice slurries during rheological measurements:

    pumping systems can remove particles from the upper

    parts of the apparatus to inject them in the lower parts;

    helical grooves may prevent stratification in rotating

    viscometers at higher shear rates. Klein et al. [9] studied

    the stratification rate of particles according to the height

    of the vessel, considering the intermediate level at which

    the particle concentration would remain, for some time,

    constant and equal to the initial concentration.

    Other authors tried to minimize the end effects. In

    rotating viscometers for instance, the higher part of the

    bob is not immersed in the sample while the lower part

    can be dug so as to insert an air bubble during

    measurement, which minimises stress transfer to thebob. This method is effective with viscoplastic fluids that

    tend to maintain the bubble but will be delicate to

    implement with ice slurries [10].

    Barnes [11] studied glide in two-phase liquidsolid

    mixtures inside viscometers. He explains that a narrow

    layer of the carrying fluid free of particles (depletion

    zone), establishes between the wall and the fluid. This

    depletion zone acts as a lubricant. According to Barnes,

    glides can explain the thixotropy phenomenon men-

    tioned by some authors. Nguyen and Boger [12] report

    that glide effects are all the more significant when the

    solid fraction is high or the particles are flocculated. On

    Table 1

    Rheological non-Newtonian models that can be used for ice

    slurries.

    Tableau 1Mode`les rheologiques non-newtoniens pouvant etre utilises pour

    les coulis de glace

    Models Equations

    Ostwald K0: n0

    :5 0

    Bingham 0 B:

    > 0:

    0 < 0Herschel-Buckley 0 K

    0n0

    > 0:

    0 < 0

    Casson 1=20 c

    1=2h i2

    > 0

    :

    0 < 0

    Fig. 1. Comparison of yield stress values given by a linear

    (Bingham) and a non-linear model.

    Fig. 1. Comparaison de la contrainte de cisaillement entre un

    mode`le lineaire (Bingham) et un mode`le non lineaire.

    V. Ayel et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107 97

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    4/13

    the other hand, glide effects can be reduced by using a

    larger gap between the rotating and fixed part of the

    viscometer or a larger tube diameter. Barnes [13] esti-

    mates that the gap must be at least 20 times greater than

    the average particle diameter, provided that this dia-

    meter stays below 0.25 mm. This ratio increases for

    higher particle diameters.

    Nguyen and Boger [12] compared the efficiency of

    viscometers used with liquidsolid mixtures. The cone

    plate and plateplate viscometers are proscribed because

    the distance between the cone or the upper plate and the

    lower plate is smaller than the particle size. Further-

    more, the liquid will be expelled from the lower plate.

    According to Yoshimura and Prudhomme [14], who

    carried out experiments in order to compare 3 types ofviscometers (parallel plate, bob-in-cup and vane-in-cup

    viscometers), the parallel plate viscometers are the least

    appropriate apparatus for the determination of the yield

    stress. The capillary viscometer is efficient in the sense that

    it simulates the flow of the mixture in a pipe. It is also less

    affected by the melting of the ice during the process (the

    fluid crosses the tube, unceasingly regenerated at the entry

    of the viscometer), but the measurements are distorted on

    the one hand by the end effects (pressure drops in the input

    and output of the tube) and on the other by the glide

    effects, which cause the particles to concentrate in the

    center of the tube [12].

    Vane-in-cup viscometers are sometimes used for

    rheological measurements with liquid-solid mixtures.

    Their external cylinders are similar to those of bob-and-

    cup viscometers but the bob is replaced by vanes (Fig. 2),

    generally four of them. According to Barnes [13], vane-

    in-cup viscometers have several advantages:

    since the inner cylinder is replaced by some uni-

    formly moving fluid, glide effects are minimised;

    due to their reduced thickness, the vanes create

    little disturbance within the sample;

    the gap can be sufficiently wide compared to the

    size of the particles.

    However, vane-in-cup viscometers are well adaptedfor high-viscosity mixtures, which ice slurries are not

    when the ice mass fraction is low. Furthermore, one can

    often use them only to measure the yield stress; while

    the vane rotates at constant speed, one observes a max-

    imum value of the torque that corresponds to the tran-

    sition between elastic and plastic behaviour. The

    relation between the maximum torque and the yield

    stress is:

    TMAX D 3

    2

    H

    D

    1

    m

    !0 2

    Table 2

    Rheological behaviour of ice slurries

    Tableau 2Comportements rheologiques des coulis de glace

    Authors Descriptions of the

    slurries

    Viscosimeters Results

    Bel and Lallemand [3] xs eau.

    Jensen et al. [6] xs

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    5/13

    where H is the immersed height and D the external dia-

    meter of the vane; m is a parameter characterising the

    end effects, equal to 3 or 6 depending on whether or not

    the vane is completely immersed in the sample. The

    main design parameters for accurate measurements have

    been summarised by Nguyen and Boger [15]. Barois et

    al. [16] added a vibrating membrane inside a vane-in-cup viscometer to reduce stratification.

    4. Distance flow and pressure drop in cylindrical ducts

    According to Darby [17], the flow of suspensions can

    be classified in three categories:

    in homogeneous flows, the particle fraction is

    large and the average particle diameter is much

    smaller than the characteristic length of the

    pipe; the dispersion can then be considered as auniform single-phase fluid.

    In heterogeneous flows, the average particle size

    is no longer negligible compared to the charac-

    teristic length of the pipe, and the particle

    fraction is lower or the density of the solid

    phase is very different from that of the carrying

    fluid.

    In saltated flows, two phases of different den-

    sities are clearly separated and the particles

    accumulate at the bottom or at the top of the

    pipe, thus constituting a bed of suspensions.

    Generally, practical flows are often a combination of

    homogeneous and heterogeneous flows.

    Quemada [18] listed the parameters that differentiate

    these three kinds of flows:

    the geometric characteristics of the suspensions:

    the particle drag coefficient depends on a Rey-

    nolds number whose characteristic length may

    include one or more ratios describing particleshape and orientation in the flow;

    the concentration of particles: interactions

    increase with solid fraction, having an effect

    starting from 2 to 3% [19];

    the density: adding solid particles changes the

    density of the mixture, the Reynolds number

    and the stratification speed. It has a dominating

    influence on the saltation of the particles.

    The model suggested by Darby [17] indicates that in a

    constant-velocity flow, the pressure drops are always

    higher in a two-phase mixture than in the carrying fluidonly. In Fig. 3, the dashed line represents the evolution

    of the linear pressure drop according to the velocity in a

    pipe filled with the carrying fluid only. There is a cri-

    tical deposit rate Vm2 that ensures minimum displace-

    ment of the solid particles and can be interpreted as the

    transition between saltated and heterogeneous flows.

    This transition velocity was observed with most of the

    slurries and corresponds to a minimum of the pressure

    drop. It may be useful to approach this velocity, but at a

    velocity higher than the critical deposit rate, in order to

    minimise the pressure drop and to avoid stratification.

    Concerning the ice slurries flows, it is noted (Table 3)

    that in many cases [3,4,6,2027], the evolution of the

    pressure drop corresponds well to the general behaviour

    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of a vane-in-cup viscometer.

    Fig. 2. Diagramme dun viscosime`tre de type vane-in-cup.

    Fig. 3. Pressure gradient plotted versus mean velocity for the

    various flow regimes (xs represents ice fraction) [17].

    Fig. 3. Pertes de charge en fonction de la vitesse moyenne pour

    differents regimes decoulement xs

    represente la fraction de

    glace) [17].

    V. Ayel et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107 99

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    6/13

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    7/13

    described by Darby [17]. Jensen et al. [6] and Bel and

    Lallemand [3] observed no change in the pressure drop

    with changing ice mass fraction provided it remained

    lower than 1015%. For Winters and Kooy [27], the

    pressure drop measured with the slurry is even veryclose to that obtained with the carrying fluid for ice

    mass fraction not exceeding 22%. Snoek and Joanis [21]

    made the assumption that the ice slurry friction factor

    could be determined from the knowledge of the water-

    only and waterglycol (liquid only) friction factors, and

    developed a correlation for this. On the other hand, in

    some works, like these of Liu et al. [28], Knodel and

    France [30] and Knodel et al. [31], the pressure drop

    decreases with an increase in the ice fraction, which

    seems to be contrary to general studies on two-phase

    flows. Knodel et al. explain this observation by a

    decrease in the flow turbulence caused by interactions

    between the fluid and the particles. According to them,

    there is a critical ice fraction beyond which the pressure

    drop remains constant (30% in this case). Knodel et al.

    [31] found that for small tubes, Reynolds numbers ran-

    ging from 38,000 to 74,000 and when xs was above 4%,

    they could write:

    f

    0:18Re0:2 0:946 3

    Knodel and France [30] observed that when the pipe

    diameters are low, the number of interactions betweenthe wall and particles increases, which tends to intensify

    friction and to decrease the damping of turbulence. Liu

    et al. [28] confirm this hypothesis and argue that the

    solid particles bring a coherent structure to the fluid,

    thus decreasing the energy dissipated by viscous fric-

    tions. They propose a correlation:

    P 15:135V1:931m 0:02227s 4

    where Vm is the mean velocity and s is the solid

    volume fraction.

    5. Flow stratification

    The forces acting on a single particle in a flow are

    (Fig. 4): the gravitational force, which is toward the

    bottom, the buoyancy force, and the drag force of thefluid on the particle; the latter is a function of the velo-

    city difference between the solid and liquid phases. Its

    direction is mainly that of the flow, with an added

    component in the direction opposed to that of the par-

    ticle sedimentation (if a movement of sedimentation is

    induced). The drag force can slow down or even prevent

    saltation. Some other forces acting on the particles that

    are more complex to determine arise from the inter-

    action among particles and between the particles and

    the walls. Their direction is random, but it tends to slow

    down the saltation rate, and due to the non-uniformity

    of the movements it acts on the whole field of saltation.

    The stratification velocity thus depends on several

    parameters:

    The particle size and shape: these parameters act

    primarily on the drag coefficient of the fluid on

    the ice crystals. The drag force can be reduced to

    its simpler expression for rigid spherical particles,

    Table 3 (continued)

    Authors Description of the slurries Geometries Comments

    Knodel et al. [31] s

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    8/13

    but their influence is more complex when their

    shape is far from spherical. The effect of the par-

    ticle shape on the drag coefficient results in a

    modification of the critical velocity for saltation.

    Generally, this factor is taken into account in cal-

    culations by coefficients of nonsphericity.

    The particle weight: the average rate of saltationis proportional to the relative density of the

    crystals and of the carrying fluid.

    The solid concentration: interactions between

    particles and the particles wakes slow down the

    saltation rate. On the other hand, a high mass

    fraction of ice may induce flocculation of the

    crystals. Agglomerations of particles will trap

    fluid, and the whole will move at sedimentation

    velocities higher than those of the single parti-

    cles. These formations are controlled by the

    nature of the flow. As long as the relative influ-

    ence of flocculation and particle interaction willbe unknown, stratification of ice crystals will

    remain difficult to describe.

    To approach an optimal flow by minimizing the

    pressure drop, one has to be as close as possible to the

    laminated flow mode (see Fig. 3). However, this presents

    the risk that the flow will be in a laminated or stationary

    bed mode, which would increase solid friction between

    the particles and the walls. According to Takahashi et

    al. [25] and Kawashima et al. [33], pressure drops in ice

    slurry flows are higher than those in pure liquid at low

    speeds, because ice particles accumulate at the top of the

    horizontal pipe, sometimes even forming solid blocks.

    These phenomena disappear at higher speeds (Vm> 1.6

    m s1). For Inaba [22], the effects of the drag force

    depend on the particle size: the smaller particles accu-

    mulate at the top of the tube while the larger ones, on

    which the drag is more significant, remain below. Snoek

    et al. [21] observed that below the velocity Vm2, solid

    friction is more significant, and the bypass section of the

    carrying fluid (with Vfluid> Vice) is reduced. Pressure

    drops thus increase even at reduced speeds. In the same

    way, Winters and Kooy [27] studied Vm2, which seems

    to be dependent on xs (for xs=7.5%, Vm2=0.12 m s1,

    while for xs=12%, Vm2=0.18 m s

    1). They alsoobserved contacts between the ice particles and the wall

    for flow rates lower than 0.3 m s1.

    Sasaki et al. [34] studied the particle-fluid relative

    velocity, which tends to increase with increasing average

    flow speed, thus preventing particle settlement.

    6. Cooling coil performance

    Table 4 gathers the informations available on the heat

    transfer coefficient h or the Nusselt number Nu

    [3,5,6,23,29,31,3540]. As a general rule, the majority of

    observations show that h or Nu increase with the flow

    rate (velocity, mass flow rate or Reynolds). Only Knodel

    et al. [31] an Snoek and Bellamy [35] observed that Nu

    decreases with increasing xs. Meewisse and Ferreira [23]

    propose a correlation for the calculation of the Nusselt

    number in laminar flow of ice slurries in circular tubes:

    Nu 38:3Gz0:15x0:52s 5

    where Gz RePrD4z

    is the Graetz number, and z is the

    axial distance along the tube. Re and Pr are respectively

    the Reynolds and the Prandtl numbers, calculated with

    the average properties of the ice slurry. The viscosity

    was evaluated with the correlation (1) of Christensen

    and Kauffeld [5]. This equation is valid for 35%:

    Nu

    Nuw 1 0:103xs 2:003Re

    0:192 30xs30 x

    0:339 Re10000

    s 12

    where Re and Nu are calculated with the properties of

    the ice slurry, and Nuw is calculated with the properties

    of the carrier fluid, using the average velocity. Eq. (1)

    was used to evaluate the viscosity. This model estimates

    the measured values within 35%, and 75% of the

    measurements are estimated within 30%. The validity

    of the correlation is limited to tubes with an inner dia-

    meter between 18 and 25 mm. Christensen and Kauffeld

    [5] suggest that the melting of ice crystals close to the wallreduces the temperature gradient through the boundary

    layer, which can explain the increase in the heat transfer

    coefficient.

    Ben Lakhdar et al. [39] and Inaba [22] studied the

    evolution of the Nusselt number with the length covered

    in the heat exchanger. The value of Nu decreases slowly

    with the progression of the slurry in the heat exchanger,

    and tends towards the values of Nu corresponding to

    the single phase flow. Kawanami et al. [40] studied the

    evolution of the heat transfer coefficient h in a heat

    exchanger, formed by a tube bended at 180 in a vertical

    plane. At the concave wall, h increases with the velocity

    of the flow. For velocities higher than 0.4 m s1, h

    decreases according to the angle of the bend, whereas

    for velocities close to 0.1 m s1, h decreases then stays

    constant. At the convex wall, h decreases according to

    the angle of the bend, but for velocities close to 0.1 m

    s1, it tends to be in general greater than that for the

    other velocity conditions at the area from 0 to about

    120. The friction of ice crystals against the wall, caused

    by their stratification, could explain these phenomena.

    The increase in the velocity of ice slurry flow causes an

    increase in the accumulation of the ice particles in the heat

    transfer area of the concave wall, as well as the decrease

    of the depletion zone thickness, owing to the mixing

    effects based on both the centrifugal and the inertial

    forces.

    Flow geometries that can combine the low-pressurelosses of laminar flows and efficient mixing would be

    particularly adapted to flows of ice slurry. An example

    of such geometries consists of a series of bent tubes with

    planes of curvature at a 90 angle with respect to the

    previous tube, thus creating alternating Dean flows

    whose chaotic characteristics can enhance mixing and

    heat transfer (Fig. 5). The counterrotating secondary

    flows called Dean roll-cells appear in curved duct due

    to the centrifugal force, that pushes the fluid particles

    against the concave wall. If the curvature plane of the

    curved ducts maintains the same orientation (as in a

    helical coil), the flow has the same structure at the

    Table 4 (continued)

    Authors Description of the

    slurries

    Geometries Comments

    (ethanol) Di=38 mm

    L=0.5 m

    h (xs=0%)=500 W/m2C, h (xs=35%)=

    2000 W/m2 K.

    Ben Lakhdar et al. [39] xs

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    11/13

    entrance and at the exit of the coil, i.e. a regular Dean

    flow. On the other hand, if each bend is turned 90

    compared to the preceding one, the Dean roll-cells

    formed in an elbow are broken by the subsequent one,

    which imposes a different orientation on them. In a coil

    composed of a series of elbows with alternating curva-

    ture planes, the fluid particles follow chaotic trajec-

    tories, even for small Reynolds numbers, allowing better

    homogenisation of the particle distribution and tem-

    peratures within the fluid. This phenomenon increases

    heat transfer considerably, provided that the Reynolds

    numbers stay low [41]. It is then possible to improve the

    efficiency of heat exchangers used with high viscosity

    fluids without increasing the velocity and the pressure

    losses.

    In a numerical study, Mokrani et al [42] used a reduced

    model to compute the flow in a helical and a chaotic coil,

    and observed the distribution at the exit plane of 40,000

    passive tracer injected at a point in the input section. Fig. 6

    shows that for a tracer injection at the centre of the input

    section and a Reynolds number of 40, the mixing is far

    more homogeneous in the chaotic coil than in the helical

    one, and this only after 10 bends. At the output of the

    chaotic coil the particles are in close to total apparent

    disorder, whatever the injection position of the particles.

    On the other hand, in the helical coil the particles follow

    the trajectories of the regular Dean roll-cells, which do

    not evolve in the flow direction.

    Mokrani et al. [43] also found experimentally that at

    very low Reynolds numbers (Re=63) the chaotic coil

    has a heat transfer efficiency 28% greater than the heli-

    cal coil. This type of coil could probably be adapted to

    the flows of ice slurries, either to allow efficient mixingof ice particles all along the distributing pipes, or to

    optimize heat transfer in some heat exchangers. Fig. 7

    shows that the temperature profile at the outlet of the

    chaotic coil, for a Reynolds number of 63, is flat and does

    not exceed a temperature difference of 3 K, while it reaches

    12 K for the helical coil under the same conditions.

    7. Conclusions

    The rheological study of ice slurries suffers from a ser-

    ious handicap, since no current apparatus has really

    Fig. 6. Images of the injected tracer after passing through dif-

    ferent numbers of bends, for both helical and chaotic configur-

    ations [42].

    Fig. 6. Images du filet de traceur deforme par lecoulement en

    fonction du nombre de coudes et de la position dinjection, pour la

    configuration helicodale et la configuration chaotique [42].

    Fig. 7. Temperature profile at the exit of the two heat exchan-

    gers for two measurements, and for Reynolds number 63 [43].

    Fig. 7. Profils de temperature a` la sortie des deux e changeurs de

    chaleur pour deux mesures et pour un nombre de Reynolds de 63

    [43].

    Fig. 5. Dean-roll-cells in a curved duct.

    Fig. 5. Cellules de Dean dans une conduite incurvee.

    V. Ayel et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107 105

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    12/13

    proved satisfactory: vane-in-cup rheometers, which seem

    in general well adapted to liquidsolid two-phase systems,

    do not allow precise measurement of any rheological

    characteristics except the yield stress. These difficulties are

    due to the low viscosity of the carrying fluid, to the size of

    the crystals and to the stratification problem (which

    could be perhaps be solved by small recirculationpumps). The capillary rheometer can be used to measure

    the linear pressure drops in a cylindrical pipe according

    to the average speed of the mixture and to the ice frac-

    tion, as many authors did, but viscosity measurements

    will be disturbed by glide effects and end effects. In any

    case, opinions seem to converge on the proposition that

    the pressure drop increases with average speed and tends

    to approach that of the carrying fluid. On the other hand,

    different authors do not agree on the behaviour of ice

    slurries with ice fraction, probably because of different

    flow reorganisation patterns in different regimes. Studies

    of the stratification regimes confirm Darbys [17] theoryof a critical deposit rate that increases as the solid

    fraction increases.

    Although the experimental conditions are different,

    the heat transfer coefficients seem to follow the same

    behaviour overall, from the point of view of the orders

    of magnitude of the numerical values as well as their

    evolutions according to various parameters.

    References

    [1] Nguyen Q, Boger DV. Yield stress measurement for con-

    centrated suspensions. J Rheo 1983;27:32149.

    [2] Barnes A. The vane-in-cup as a novel rheometer geometry

    for shear thinning and thixotropic materials. J Rheo 1990;

    34:84186.

    [3] Bel O, Lallemand A. Contribution a` le tude du comporte-

    ment thermohydraulique dun me lange diphasique : le

    coulis de glace. Etude the orique et expe rimentale. PhD

    theses, INSA Lyon, ISAL 0000, 1996.

    [4] Ben Lakhdar M, Lallemand A. Comportement thermo-

    hydraulique dun fluide frigoporteur diphasique : le coulis

    de glace. Etude the orique et expe rimentale. PhD theses,

    INSA Lyon, ISAL 0092, 1998.

    [5] Christensen K, Kauffeld M. Heat transfer measurementswith ice slurry. International ConferenceHeat Transfer

    Issues in Natural Refrigerants, IIR/IIF; 1997. p. 12741.

    [6] Jensen E, Christensen K, Hansen T, Schneider P, Kauffeld

    M. Pressure drop and heat transfer with ice slurry, Purdue

    University, IIF/IIR; 2000. p. 5219.

    [7] Doetsch C., Pressure drop and flow pattern of ice slurries,

    third workshop on ice slurries of the IIR, 1618 May

    2001, Lucerne, Switzerland p. 534.

    [8] Royon L. Quest-ce-que le coulis de glace stabilise e. Rev

    Gen Froid 1998;983:5760.

    [9] Klein B, Laskowski JS, Partridge SJ. A new viscometer for

    rheological measurements on settling suspensions. J Rheo

    1995;39:82740.

    [10] Chow A, Sinton S, Iwamiga J. Shear-induced particle

    migration in Couette and parallel-plate viscometers: NMR

    imaging and stress measurements. Phys Fluids 1994;6:

    256176.

    [11] Barnes A. A review of the slip (wall depletion) of polymer

    solutions, emulsions and particles suspensions in visc-

    ometers: its cause, character and cure. J Non-Newt Fluid

    Mech 1994;56:22151.

    [12] Nguyen Q, Boger DV. Measuring the flow properties of

    yield stress fluids. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 1992;24:4788.

    [13] Barnes A. Measuring the viscosity of large-particle (and

    floculated) suspensionsa note on the necessary gap size

    of rotational viscometers. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 2000;

    94:2137.

    [14] Yoshimura AS, Prudhomme RK, Princen HM, Kiss AD.

    A comparison of techniques for measuring yield stresses. J

    Rheo 1987;31:699710.

    [15] Nguyen Q, Boger DV. Direct yield stress measurement

    with the vane method. J Rheo 1985;29:33547.

    [16] Barois A, Marchal P, Falk V, Chaplin L. Experimental

    study of powder rheological behaviour. Powder Technol1999;103:5864.

    [17] Darby R. Hydrodynamics of slurries and suspensions.

    Encyclopedia Fluid Mech 1986;5:4991.

    [18] Quemada D, Relation comportement-structure dans les

    dispersions concentre es. In: Se m. Therm. Des Liq.

    Compl., France: La Baule; 1984. p. 340.

    [19] Haoreau F, Etude dynamique et thermique de suspensions

    solides-liquides non newtoniennes en conduites. The` se

    de doctorat, Me canique et Energe tique, Universite de

    Nancy I, 1996.

    [20] Grandum S, Nakagomi K. Characteristics of ice slurry

    containing antifreeze protein for ice storage applications. J

    Thermophys Heat Transfer 1997;11:4616.

    [21] Snoek C, Joanis S, Gupta R. Pressure drop characteristics

    of ice-water flows. Two Phases Flow Model Exp 1995:

    65563.

    [22] Inaba H. New challenge in advanced thermal energy

    transportationusing functionally thermal fluids. Int J

    Therm Sci 2000;39:9911003.

    [23] Meewisse JW, Ferreira CA, Optimal properties of ice

    slurries in secondary cooling systems. Purdue University,

    IIR-IIF; 2000. p. 51320.

    [24] Stutz B., Bedecarrats J. P., Erriguible A., Peuvrel C.,

    Dumas J. P., Transferts de chaleur dans des e changeurs

    coaxiaux traverse s par un fluide charge en billes, Congre` s

    francais de thermique, SFT 2001, Nantes, 2001. p. 377

    82.[25] Takahashi H, Wilson JW. A laboratory study of pressure

    loss and pressure fluctuation for ice-water slurry flows in a

    horizontal pipe. Ice Slurry Transp Distr Cool Netw 1993:

    497510.

    [26] Sellgren A. Hydraulic behaviour of ice particles in water,

    10th Int. Conf. Hydr. Transp. Sol. in Pipes, 1986. p. 21217.

    [27] Winters JP, Kooy RJ. Direct freeze of ice slurry district

    cooling system evaluation. Proc 82nd Annual Conf Int

    District Heating and Cooling Assoc 1991:38198.

    [28] Liu YH, Zhang Z, Zhao J, Chen P. Experiment study on

    friction loss characteristics of pipes with ice slurry. Science

    et technique du froid. Air conditioning in rise buildings 97

    vol. 3, Shangai, 912 Sept 1997; p. 912.

    106 V. Ayel et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107

  • 7/28/2019 1-s2.0-S0140700702000166-main

    13/13

    [29] Zhao JM, Liu YH, Zhang Z, Chen PL, Experimental

    study on cooling coil performance with ice slurry as

    working fluid, Science et technique du froid, Air con-

    ditioning in rise buildings 97, vol. 3. Shangai, 912 Sept

    1997; p. 4959.

    [30] Knodel BD, France DM. Pressure drop in ice-water slur-

    ries for thermal storage application. Exp Heat Transf

    1988;1:26575.

    [31] Knodel BD, France DM, Choi U, Wamsganss M. Heat

    transfer and pressure drop in ice-water slurries. Applied

    Thermal Engineering 2000;20:67185.

    [32] Egolf P, Sari O, Meili F, Vuarnoz D, Pressure drop and

    heat transfer in a cylindrical heat exchanger with ice slurry

    flow. Third workshop on ice slurries of the IIR, 1618

    May 2001, Lucerne, Switzerland, p. 7784.

    [33] Kawashima T, Sasaki M, Takahashi H. Experimental

    study of snow-water mixture flows in horizontal pipes. In:

    Shook C, editor. Slurry handling and pipeline transport-

    hydrotransport, 12th ed. London: Mechanical Engineer-

    ing Publications Ltd; 1993. p. 52533.

    [34] Sasaki M, Kawashima T, Takahashi H. Slip velocities ofsolid-liquid mixtures flows in horizontal pipes. Proc. Int.

    Symp. On Two-Ph. Flow Modelling and Exp., Rome,

    1995, p. 10359.

    [35] Snoek C, Bellamy J. Heat transfer measurements of ice

    slurry in tube flow, Exp. Heat Transfer. Fluid Mech

    Thermo 1997:19937.

    [36] Stamatiou E, Kawaji M, Lee B, Goldstein V, Experimental

    investigation of ice slurry flow and heat transfer in a plate-

    type heat exchanger. Third workshop on ice slurries of the

    IIR, 1618 May 2001, Lucerne, Switzerland, p. 618.

    [37] Harada E, Toda M, Kuriyama M, Konno H. Heat trans-

    fer between wall and solid-water suspension flow in hori-

    zontal pipes. J Chem Eng Japan 1985;18:338.

    [38] Stutz B, Reghem P, Friction losses of two-phase flow

    liquid-solid, Third workshop on ice slurries of the IIR, 16

    18 May 2001, Lucerne, Switzerland, p. 4552.

    [39] Ben Lakhdar, Fournaison M, Guilpart L, Guilpart J.

    Caracte ristiques dun me lange eau-e thanol monophasique

    et diphasique. Rev Gen Froid 1999;990:6973.

    [40] Kawanami T, Yamada M, Fukusako S, Melting charac-

    teristics of fine particle ice slurry at the return bend of flow

    path, Third workshop on ice slurries of the IIR, 2001 16

    18 May 2001, Lucerne, Switzerland, p. 4552.

    [41] Castelain C, Mokrani A, Leguer Y, Peerhossaini H.

    Experimental study of chaotic advection in twisted duct

    flow. Eur J Mech 2001;20:20532.

    [42] Mokrani A, Castelain C, Peerhossaini H. Mesure duchaos dans les syste` mes conservatifs en vue de le tude des

    transferts dans les syste` mes ouverts. Int J Thermal Sci

    1998;37:45974.

    [43] Mokrani A, Castelain C, Peerhossaini H. On the effects of

    chaotic advection on heat transfer. Int J Heat Mass

    Transfer 1997;40:3089104.

    V. Ayel et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 95107 107