1. Rationale of research 7. Further works8. References Damage to the built environment and the...

1
1. Rationale of research 7. Further works 8. References Damage to the built environment and the consequential effects of this damage contributes significantly to economic loss from natural disasters (Haigh, 2010; UNDP, 2013). See Figure 1. 3. Objectives 1. To identify and assess the social, economic and environmental impacts of disasters on businesses; 2. To examine the loss mitigation measures that can be adopted by SMEs to address the economic impacts of disaster; 3. To evaluate the characteristics of risks of investing in disaster resilience; 4. To assess barriers to private investment and benefits of investing in disaster resilience; 5. To develop an instrument for assessing disaster resilience maturity level of the built environment of SMEs; 6. To assess the relationship between built environment disaster resilience maturity level and expected economic loss from a disaster; and 7. To develop and validate the framework that incorporates disaster resilience maturity level and economic loss. The conceptual framework is currently being developed, expert forum review will commence soon. Other activities will be carried out as outlined in the method section. The aim of this research is to develop a framework that encourages investment in disaster resilience of the built environment for the business sector through the analysis of disaster resilience maturity levels and risks associated with each level. Evaluation Econom icand Social Im pact Calculations Associated Risks Resilience/M aturity Level Im provem ent Haigh, R. (2010). Discussion paper: Developing a resilient built environment: Post-disaster reconstruction as a window of opportunity. Paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Built Environments (ICSBE- 2010), Kandy. UNDP. (2013). Analysing the vulnerability of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises to natural hazards and their capacity to act as drivers of community recovery (pp. 1-77). Geneva: UNISDR.. Figure 4 Investment in built environment resilience can be made at any of the layers Figure 5 Research method Figure 3 Pictorial representation of the research aim “You can only improve if you know how you are doing” Disaster type : Flood Target: Small and Medium sized enterprises Figure 6 Summary of research concept Figure 1 Disasters and the built environment 4. Scope Nat. Hazard Disaste r People and other assets Business disruption Job loss Reconstructi on cost Asset damage Stock damage Others Built Environment International National Community/Local Authority Company/ Organisation Figure 2 How threats that accompany flood events interact with properties Different threat types attack the elements of a property and its surroundings at different levels and stages during a disaster. Increased investment in the use of disaster resilience and resistance measures in the built environment can help minimize damage and loss. Note: Economic loss is dependent on the depth of impact/magnitude of loss of functionality and the time taken to recover. Enhancing investment in the disaster resilience of the built environment Construction Economics and Management Research Group: www.northumbria-qs.org Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Environment 5. Method 6. Summary of research concept 2. Aim of the study Supervisors: Prof. Srinath Perera and Prof. Andrew Collins Onaopepo Adeniyi, 2 nd Year; email: [email protected] Literature review and synthesis -Im pactofdisasterson SM Es, -m itigation m easures, -risksofinvesting in resilience, -barriersand benefitsofinvesting in resilience and - builtenvironm entparam eters and criteria for resilience to flood -factorsinfluencing dam age from flood Developm entofa conceptual M aturitym odel (Resilience level m odel) Expertforum Objectives1 -4 Objective 5 Data collection and analysis Literature review Conceptual M aturity m odel (Resilience level m odel) Key -Process -Output/Input -Final deliverable Objective 6 Objective 7 Fram ework developm entand validation Interm ediate M aturity M odel(Resilience level m odel) Case Study 2 -Costing ofspecificationsforeach level -Estim ating the risk associated w ith each resilience level -Estim ation ofloss/gain associated w ith each level The fram ew ork -Refined M aturity/Resilience level M odel -Risk & econom icim pact calculation m ethodology for SM Es Validation Case Study Final fram ew ork Case Study 3 -Costing ofspecificationsforeach level -Estim ating the risk associated w ith each resilience level -Estim ation ofloss/gain associated w ith each level Case Study 1 -Costing ofspecificationsforeach level -Estim ating the risk associated w ith each resilience level -Estim ation ofloss/gain associated w ith each level Expertevaluation

Transcript of 1. Rationale of research 7. Further works8. References Damage to the built environment and the...

Page 1: 1. Rationale of research 7. Further works8. References Damage to the built environment and the consequential effects of this damage contributes significantly.

1. Rationale of research

7. Further works 8. References

Damage to the built environment and the consequential effects of this damage contributes significantly to economic loss from natural disasters (Haigh, 2010; UNDP, 2013). See Figure 1.

3. Objectives1. To identify and assess the social, economic and environmental

impacts of disasters on businesses;

2. To examine the loss mitigation measures that can be adopted by SMEs to address the economic impacts of disaster;

3. To evaluate the characteristics of risks of investing in disaster resilience;

4. To assess barriers to private investment and benefits of investing in disaster resilience;

5. To develop an instrument for assessing disaster resilience maturity level of the built environment of SMEs;

6. To assess the relationship between built environment disaster resilience maturity level and expected economic loss from a disaster; and

7. To develop and validate the framework that incorporates disaster resilience maturity level and economic loss.

The conceptual framework is currently being developed, expert forum review will commence soon. Other activities will be carried out as outlined in the method section.

The aim of this research is to develop a framework that encourages investment in disaster resilience of the built environment for the business sector through the analysis of disaster resilience maturity levels and risks associated with each level.

Evaluation

Economic and Social Impact Calculations

Associated Risks

Resilience/Maturity Level

Improvement

Haigh, R. (2010). Discussion paper: Developing a resilient built environment: Post-disaster reconstruction as a window of opportunity. Paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Built Environments (ICSBE-2010), Kandy.

UNDP. (2013). Analysing the vulnerability of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises to natural hazards and their capacity to act as drivers of community recovery (pp. 1-77). Geneva: UNISDR..

Figure 4 Investment in built environment resilience can be made at any of the layers Figure 5 Research method

Figure 3 Pictorial representation of the research aim

“You can only improve if you know how you are doing”

Disaster type : Flood Target: Small and Medium sized enterprises

Figure 6 Summary of research concept

Figure 1 Disasters and the built environment

4. Scope

N

at. H

azar

d

Disaster

People and other assets

Business disruption

Job loss

Reconstruction cost

Asset damage

Stock damage

Others

Built Environment

Literature review and synthesis

- Impact of disasters on SMEs, - mitigation measures, - risks of investing in resilience, - barriers and benefits of investing in resilience and- built environment parameters and criteria for resilience to flood- factors influencing damage from flood

Development of a conceptual Maturity model

(Resilience level model)

Expert forum

Objectives 1 - 4

Objective 5

Data

colle

ction

and a

nalys

isLit

erat

ure r

eview

Conceptual Maturity model (Resilience level

model)

Key- Process

- Output/Input

- Final deliverable

Objective 6

Objective 7

Fram

ewor

k dev

elopm

ent a

nd va

lidati

on

Intermediate Maturity Model(Resilience level

model)

Case Study 2- Costing of specifications for each level - Estimating the risk associated with each resilience level- Estimation of loss/gain associated with each level

The framework- Refined Maturity/Resilience

level Model- Risk & economic impact

calculation methodology for SMEs

Validation Case Study

Final framework

Case Study 3- Costing of specifications for each level - Estimating the risk associated with each resilience level- Estimation of loss/gain associated with each level

Case Study 1- Costing of specifications for each level - Estimating the risk associated with each resilience level- Estimation of loss/gain associated with each level

Expert evaluation

International National

Community/Local Authority

Company/Organisation

Figure 2 How threats that accompany flood events interact with properties

Different threat types attack the elements of a property and its surroundings at different levels and stages during a disaster. Increased investment in the use of disaster resilience and resistance measures in the built environment can help minimize damage and loss.

Note: Economic loss is dependent on the depth of impact/magnitude of loss of functionality and the time taken to recover.

Enhancing investment in the disaster resilience of the built environment

Construction Economics and Management Research Group: www.northumbria-qs.org

Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Environment

5. Method

6. Summary of research concept2. Aim of the study

Supervisors: Prof. Srinath Perera and Prof. Andrew CollinsOnaopepo Adeniyi, 2nd Year; email: [email protected]