1 Pressure Ulcers: Stages and ICD-9 Coding Joanne Lynn, MD Quality Measurement & Health Assessment...

19
1 Pressure Ulcers: Stages and ICD-9 Coding Joanne Lynn, MD Quality Measurement & Health Assessment Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services September 28, 2007 [email protected] MEDICARE MEDICARE

Transcript of 1 Pressure Ulcers: Stages and ICD-9 Coding Joanne Lynn, MD Quality Measurement & Health Assessment...

1

Pressure Ulcers: Stages and ICD-9 Coding

Joanne Lynn, MDQuality Measurement & Health Assessment Group

Office of Clinical Standards and QualityCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services

September 28, [email protected]

MEDICAREMEDICARE

2

DefinitionsDefinitions

Pressure ulcers are localized injuries to skin and underlying tissues associated with pressure and also with friction, immobility, poor nutrition, hard surfaces, and existing scars.

The stages: I – persistent erythema (no actual ulcer) II – shallow ulcer or abrasion – skin remains III – Through the skin into subcutaneous tissues IV – To bone, tendon, or muscle

3

STAGE I STAGE I

4

Stage IIStage II

5

Stage IIIStage III

Stage III

6

Stage IVStage IV

7

Why (Temporarily) “Unstageable?”Why (Temporarily) “Unstageable?”

• Some lesions are known but not able to be examined at a particular time – e.g., under a dressing or not debrided

• Some lesions are covered by an eschar or blister and best practice is to let healing take place until the skin breaks down

• Some lesions are injuries in evolution, for which the eventual extent of injury is unclear until the dead tissue demarcates

8

Why Stage?Why Stage?

• Stage III and IV cause most of the suffering, care burden, and complications

• Stage III and IV appear to respond well to improved practices

• Stage I and II are (mercifully) much more common

• Stage I is not very reliably detected• Combining all stages makes improvement

hard to track

9

For example – the National Nursing For example – the National Nursing Home Improvement CollaborativeHome Improvement Collaborative

• Three dozen nursing homes• Reporting data over more than a year• While improving care practices

10

No Change in Combined Stages I-IVNo Change in Combined Stages I-IV

Stage I-IV Pressure Ulcer Prevalence for Low-Risk Residents

0

1

2

3

4

2003

Q3

2003

Q4

2004

Q1

2004

Q2

2004

Q3

2004

Q4Year and Quarter

Median Rate

Nation

ParticipatingFacilities

Stage I-IV Pressure Ulcer Prevalence for Short-Stay Residents

0

5

10

15

20

25

2003Q3

2003Q4

2004Q1

2004Q2

2004Q3

2004Q4

Year and Quarter

Me

dia

n R

ate

Nation

ParticipatingFacilitiesStage I-IV Pressure Ulcer Prevalence

for High-Risk Residents

0

3

6

9

12

15

2003

Q3

2003

Q4

2004

Q1

2004

Q2

2004

Q3

2004

Q4

Year and Quarter

Median Rate

Nation

ParticipatingFacilities

11

BUT – Major Reduction in Stage III/ IVBUT – Major Reduction in Stage III/ IV

12

NNHIC resultsNNHIC results

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Month (Nov 03-Sept 04)

N p

er 1

00 O

ccup

ied

Bed

s

Prevalence Stage II-IV

Prevalence Stage II

Prevalence Stage III-IV

Incidence Stage II-IV

Incidence Stage II

Incidence Stage III-IV

13

Measurable Components of QualityMeasurable Components of Quality

1. Assessment of risk

2. Mitigation of risk – prevention

3. Rapid detection, characterization

4. Low incidence, low prevalence

5. Rapid healing of Stage 2

6. Aggressive healing of Stage 3 and 4

14

About Measuring Quality CareAbout Measuring Quality Care

• Stage I has poor reliability (e.g., dark skin)• Stage II incidence may respond only

weakly to improved practices • Stage III/IV incidence responds to

improved practices• Most Stage II can heal within a month• Most Stage III/IV can heal, but slowly.

15

Multiple functions for CMS Multiple functions for CMS measurementmeasurement

• Quality measures

• Quality monitoring and improvement

• Payment

• Pay for performance

• Evidence of effectiveness

• Practicality, burden

16

Proposed Minimum DataProposed Minimum Data

• PU – Yes or No

• Risk Evaluation timely – Yes or No

• N at stage II, III/IV, and unstageable

• N by stage, incident with this provider

• N Stage II healed within a month

• Length, width of largest Stage III/IV

• Follow up on unstageable

17

Reasons to change the CodingReasons to change the Coding

• To enable tracking incidence and prevalence of Stage III/IV pressure ulcers (which cause suffering and nursing costs)

• Separately from Stage II (which are indicators of risk but much less harmful)

• To treat Stage I as a risk factor• And thereby to enable cross-setting

improvement activities

18

The proposed changesThe proposed changes

707 Chronic ulcer of skin (no change)707.0 Decubitus (pressure) ulcer (no change)

707.2 Decubitus (pressure) ulcer stages707.20 – NOS, unstageable707.21 – Stage I707.22 – Stage II707.23 – Stage III707.24 – Stage IV

19

Support for the proposalSupport for the proposal

• CMS – multiple op-divs (survey and certification, clinical standards and quality, Medicare management, etc.)

• CDC – multiple op-divs (healthcare quality promotion, surveys, classifications)

• Experts from the professional wound care community