1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 AASHTO SCORT Conference – Oklahoma City, OK...
-
Upload
caitlin-franklin -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 AASHTO SCORT Conference – Oklahoma City, OK...
1
Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach
2009 AASHTO SCORT Conference – Oklahoma City, OKSeptember 20 – 23, 2009
Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs
2
Fast Facts• Freight
Revenue $17.1 B
• Route Miles 32,000 in 23 States
• Employees 45,000
• Annual Payroll $3.8 B
• Customers 25,000
• Locomotives 8,400
Portland
Oakland
LA
Calexico
Nogales El Paso
Seattle
Eagle Pass
SLC
Eastport
Brownsville
Houston
KC
St. Louis
Omaha
Twin Cities
Duluth
Denver
Laredo
Dallas
Memphis
Chicago
New Orleans
Union Pacific System
3
Both Passenger & Freight Solutions Required
• Communities want passenger rail transportation to . . .
– Reduce traffic congestion
– Avoid/reduce road construction and maintenance
– Promote economic growth
• Communities depend on freight rail transportation to . . .
– Efficiently supply the goods they use everyday (food, vehicles, energy)
– Reduce dependency on foreign oil through its fuel efficiency
– Lower emissions by Two Thirds
– Reduces Highway Congestion
– Support infrastructure with private funds – not taxpayer dollars
– Promote economic grown
4
Union Pacific Participates in Passenger Rail Commuter Trains on UP
• 1,430 weekly trains; 880,000 weekly passengers
• Examples:
– Chicago Metra (UP operates the commuter trains on three routes; USA’s 7th largest commuter operation)
– Altamont Commuter Express (Stockton – San Jose, CA)
– CALTRAIN (San Jose – Gilroy, CA)
– Metrolink (LA - Riverside, CA & Moorpark - Montalvo, CA)
Amtrak
• 550 weekly trains; 130,000 weekly passengers
• Example:
– Capital Corridor Service (San Jose – Oakland – Sacramento – Auburn; 32 daily trains)
5
Principles for Achieving Appropriate Balance
• Safe passenger and freight operations
• Reliable service for passengers and freight customers
• Protect capacity to accommodate future freight traffic growth
• Market-based compensation and no additional exposure to liability