1PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

EPECURSearch for Cryptoexotic Non-strange Memeber of the Pentaquark

Antidecuplet in the Elastic Pion-Proton Scattering and Kaon-Lambda Production

I,G. Alekseev, I.G. Bordyuzhin, P.Ye. Budkovsky, D.A. Fedin, V.P. Kanavets , L.I. Koroleva, A.A. Manaenkova, B.V. Morozov, V.M. Nesterov, V.V. Ryltsov, D.N. Svirida, A.D. Sulimov

ITEP, MoscowV.A. Andreev, Ye.A. Filimonov, V.V. Golubev, A.I. Kovalev, N.G. Kozlenko, V.S. Kozlov,

A.G. Krivshich, D.V. Novinsky, V.V. Sumachev, V.I. Tarakanov, V.Yu. TrautmanPNPI, Gatchina

M. SadlerACU, Abilene

2PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Pentaquark antidecuplet

?

3PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

DIANA: doubled statistics and now has ~60 +-events hep-ex/0603017

+

PDG 2006: zero *

SVD-2: “392 signal events over 1990 background ones.”

hep-ex/0509033

SPHINX: no + signal found.

hep-ex/0407026

Belle: hep-ex/0507014

4PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

+

hep-ph/0507180hep-ph/0312229

hep-ph/0505134hep-th/0408034hep-th/0410068

CLAS: hep-ex/0307018

CLAS: < 0.3 nb hep-ex/0603028 < 5 nb hep-ex/0604047

< 0.7 nb hep-ex/0606062

~500 times difference !

These theoretical calculations were done between the two CLAS experiments. The first CLAS results provoked theoreticians to get larger cross section. Nevertheless the second CLAS results do not contradict to [35].

5PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Interference?Moskov Amarian, Dmitri Diakonov, and Maxim V. Polyakov (hep-ph/0612150)

MKsp

MKsKL

E=1.90 GeV

6PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

What is special in our experiment:• “Formation”–type experiment.• Extremely high invariant mass resolution (~0.6 MeV), provided by high momentum resolution of the magneto-optic channel 0.1%.• Magnetless spectrometer with drift chambers.• Liquid hydrogen.• Very small amount of matter on the particle paths.• High statistic precision: 0.5% for elastic scattering and 1% for K-production.

pp 0SKpand

Not only pentaquark…• Precise cross section measurements:p p: d/d 0.5% statistics precision and 1 MeV momentum stepp K0: REAC 1% statistics precision and the same step

Very important data for PWA• Usual resonace P11 N(1710)***• -polarization in the reaction p K0 - an order of magnitude better precision then the best data available now - NIMROD (78)

7PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Some formalizmElastic scattering amplitude could be presented as a sum over partial waves:

l – phase of wave l, l - elasticity of wave l.

Partial amplitude:

near the resonance one can wrote: fl(E)=flB+fl

r(E), where flB has a weak energy dependence. Partial

cross section: l=4(2l+1)|flB+fl

r|2

Breit-Wigner resonance:

ik

ef

i

l 2

12

Elastic scattering:

- elasticity

2/)(2)(

iEEk

eEf

r

eli

rl

,)(k

XeiEf

i

rr

l

elX

Reaction pK:

- branching

2/)(2)(

iEEkk

eEf

rK

Keli

rl

,)(

K

i

rr

lkk

BRXeiEf

KBR

)(cos)1)(12(2

1),(

2

0

max

l

il

llel Pel

ikEf

l

8PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

SensitivityP11-wave resonance cross section for mr=1.7 GeV/c

Elastic scattering

X=0.05

elr=0.12 mb, el10 mb

elr /el=1.2%

Not very good sensitivity

22

4)12( X

klr

el

K-production (k=0.56 GeV/c, kK=0.2 GeV/c)

X=0.01, BR=0.1

Kr=0.13 mb, K=0.9 mb

Kr / K =15%

Excellent sensitivity

BRXkk

lK

rK

4)12(

Total cross section of K-production a good method.Total elastic cross section not a good method.This means that in the elastic scattering we should measure differential cross sections, where resonance will manifest itself in an interference of P11-amplitude with the sum of all other amplitudes. Then the effect will be proportional to X and not to X2. We chose an angle range where sensitivity to P11-wave is reasonably good.

9PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Experimental conditionsDifferential cross section –p–p

CM LABP

dd

dd

0.2 mB/sr

Expected statistics was estimated to the differential cross section of 0.2 mB/sr. The energy dependence is smooth compare to the sharp a few MeV resonances under the question.

10PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Expected effectDifferential cross section of the –p–p elastic scattering

LABP

dd

Existing data doesn’t allow to find a narrow structure

Our idea is to measure differential elastic cross section with the statistical error 0.5% and step in the invariant mass 0.6 MeV

We will cover angle range 40--120о in the center of mass frame and momentum range 900—1200 MeV/c (MR=1610--1770 MeV)

With fixed beam settings we can cover about 20 MeV in the invariant mass. Then we can go in 10 MeV steps

0.2 mB/sr

6

11PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Expected resultsResonance parameters within safe reach by the experiment:

This provide a good coverage of both theoretical and experimental expectations.

Elastic scattering

K-production

Width (2-20) MeV (2-20) MeV Elastic width, Гel >0.1 MeV >0.02 MeV Elasticity, X >0.05 >0.01

Important note for the setup to be createdThe event selection in our magnetless spectrometer is based on the angular correlations of relatively low energy particles. This requires to have the smallest

possible multiple scattering on the paths of all particles. We needed light chambers with small amount of matter. Drift chambers with hexagonal structure were selected.

Important note for the setup to be createdThe event selection in our magnetless spectrometer is based on the angular correlations of relatively low energy particles. This requires to have the smallest

possible multiple scattering on the paths of all particles. We needed light chambers with small amount of matter. Drift chambers with hexagonal structure were selected.

12PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Setup for elastic scattering Proportional chambers with 1mm pitch and 40 um aluminum foil potential electrode in the first focus (PC1-3) and in front of the target (PC4-6). Liquid hydrogen target with beryllium outer shell and mylar hydrogen container. The target diameter is 40 mm and the length along the beam ~250 mm. 8 modules of drift chambers with hexagonal structure to measure tracks of particles produced. Trigger scintillation counters S1, S2, A1 and hodoscopes H2, H3. NMR system for measurement field in the magneto-optic channel dipoles with precision better 0.1%. Time-of-flight difference between beam pions and antiprotons measurement to control average momentum in each bin. 2107 events in 2-3 weeks

–p–p

13PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Setup for –pK0 The same:

1. The beam line.

2. Beam proportional chambers.

3. The liquid hydrogen target.

4. Drift chambers DC1-5 with sencitive volume 800x1200 mm2

To get reasonable 15-20% acceptance we need nearly 4 setup

Internal drift chambers DC6—DC9 (500х700 mm2)

Large drift chamber DC10 (1400х2000 мм2) Double layer trigger and TOF hodoscope

H1,2 with 100х100 mm2 granularity 2107 events in 4-5 weeks. Most of the events have either

all 4 particles going forward or3 particles including the proton going forward and one pion going in some other direction

14PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

A prototype chamber with one coordinate and 2 mm pitch.

The beam

Two coordinate chambers with 1 mm pitch.

Magnetic quadruple

Proportional chambers with 1 mm pitchManufactured and tested:

• 6 two-coordinate chambers 200х200 mm

• 40 um aluminum foil was used for potential electrodes

• Magic gas mixture

• 3200 channels of front-end electronics

100-channel front-end board, including signal

amplification and shaping, digital delay line, trigger

block recording and sending via USB 2.0 interface

Test with -source Proportional chambers in the first focus of the magneto-optic channel

15PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Elastic scattering

The first excitation level

The second and the third excitation levels

Horizontal coordinate distribution of events of internal accelerator beam scattering on the thin beryllium target. Events were collected at the beginning of spill. This picture corresponds to the momentum resolution 0.06%.

Measurement of the beam momentum resolution

P + 7Be P + 7Be*

16PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

 

Liquid hydrogen target

Liquid level

Liquid hydrogen

•The mylar container L=25 cm, 40 mm.•Beryllium outer shell•Tested with liquid neon and hydrogen.

LHe

Heat exchange block

The mylar container

Н2

liquidgas

While filling with hydrogen

Mylar container

17PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

Front-end electronics: 6 24-channel boards

Drift chamber module “X” (wires along the short side) under test at ITEP accelerator. A “Y” module could be seen behind the “X” module.

Drift chambers with hexagonal structure

0

1 м

0.5 м The beam

Efficiency > 99%Precision < 0.2 mm

18PANIC’08 D.N. Svirida (ITEP)

The plan: start datataking this winter.

Welcome to new collaborators!

We already have:• The magneto-optic channel with 7 proportional chambers beam particles targeting system• 6 modules of 1200x800 mm2 and 2 modules of 600x400 mm2 drift chambers.• 5000 channels of front-end electronics for these chambers readout equipped with power supply and commutation blocks.• The liquid hydrogen target with mylar container and beryllium outer shell.• 34 scintillator counters for the elastic trigger hodoscope.• Mechanical support to fix all parts of the setup.

We need for elastic setup:• NMR system for dipole magnets field measurement.

We need for K-production:• Trigger hodoscope with time-of-flight capability.• TDC and TDC for this hodoscope.• Large drift chamber and chambers with tilted wires.

As a conclusion: the status.