1

Operational Integration Team

Complex Procedure Presentation

AlaskaOctober 2-4, 2002

Dave Peterson

2

Satellite Navigation’s Mission WAAS/LAAS Implementation

3

Objective

• FAA Satellite Navigation Mission

• Overview of Operational Integration Program

• Status of Operational Integration Projects

4

Current WAAS PerformanceAvailable Via FAA GPS Website

http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/vpl.html

5

Potential LAAS Benefits

• Achieve Consistent, Accurate, Repeatable Performance

• Expand Closely Spaced Parallel Runway Ops

• Support Advanced/Complex Procedures Which Provide Improvements in Safety and Capacity to Lower Minima

• Support Surface Movement Applications

• Eliminate Need for In-Aircraft Procedure Database

• Support Extended Arrival Procedures

• Support RNP Based Operations

6

Potential LAAS Benefits

• Reduce Aircraft Separation Requirements

• Reduce ATC Workload

• Reduce Obstacle Clearance Requirements

• Ability to Change or Create Approach Procedures without Infrastructure Changes

• Ability to Implement Multiple, Segmented, or Variable Glide Slopes

• Support Runway Incursion Avoidance Systems

• Compress the Density of Terminal Operations

7

Potential LAAS Benefits

• Support Adjacent Airport Operations

• De-conflict Airspace

• Enable Environmental and Security Improvements (e.g., Noise Abatement)

• Support Highly Reliable 4-D Guidance in Terminal Area

• Ability to Use Single LAAS System to Support Approaches at Multiple Runway Ends

• Improved ATC Terminal Area Surveillance Through Improved Navigation Accuracies

8

Operational Integration

9

10

Operational Evolution of SatNav Procedures

CA

PA

BIL

ITY

TIME

LAAS CAT I

Advanced Procedures

LAAS CAT II/III

1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022

WAAS GLS

WAAS LPV Approaches

WAAS LNAV/VNAV Approaches

Stand-Alone GPS Approaches

GPS Overlays

11

WAAS Policy and Guidance

LNAV LNAV/VNAV LPV

Flt Stds Guidance

TERPS

Air Traffic Control

NOTAMS

Certification

Flight Inspection

Procedure Production

Complete Now In Progress, Complete by 7/03

In Progress, NOT Complete by 7/03

Not Started

12

LAAS Policy and Guidance

Certification

Procedure Production

Flight Inspection

NOTAMS

Air Traffic Control

TERPS

Flt Stds Guidance

CAT II/IIICAT I

Not StartedIn Progress, NOT Complete by 7/03

In Progress, Complete by 7/03

Complete Now

13

LAAS Avionics

• LAAS Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) DO-253A and Interface Control Document (ICD) DO-246B, Updated 11/28/01

• Technical Standard Orders (TSOs) for Navigation Sensor and VHF Data Broadcast Being Prepared for Public Comment

• Software Mod to Add WAAS GEO Ranging to LAAS MMR Navigation Solution Delivered, 3/29/02

• Modifications to Add Curved Approach Processing Being Initiated at FAATC

14

Flight Standards

15

Approach Strategy

• Evolve from Angular Criteria (Today) to Optimized Criteria (Angular/Linear)

• Industry Desires Linear Criteria• Phase 1

– Benefit Establishes a Foundation for All– Commonality of RNP Across NAS

• Phase 2 – Benefit Comes With RNP <0.3– RNP Based Missed Approach Guidance

• Leverage CAST, But Do Not Disrupt• Both Currently Funded Under CAST

– Still Need SAAR Procedures• Up to 2000 Additional Procedures - Subject to

Benefits Analysis

• Specials Continue

16

Strategy

- RNP 1- Optimize

structure- Procedural

separation- Mandates?

Initial Implementation Next Steps

Public RNP 0.3• Qualifying aircraft: GPS or RNP-certified using

DME/DME/Inertial• TERPS: 2xRNP primary, 1xRNP transitional• Implement on RNAV approaches, replace LNAV/VNAVSpecials

Public SAARLower RNP

Public SOIA

Approach

TerminalArrivals &Departures

En Route RNP 2 • Qualifying aircraft: Tailor RNAV criteria (GPS, DME)• TERPS: 8 mi. aircraft separation (centerline)• Implement wherever advantageous and equipage

exists• Supports existing route structures.

RNP 2• Qualifying aircraft: Tailor RNAV criteria (GPS, DME)• TERPS: Using Level 2 RNAV DPs, RNAV STARS• Implement as part of national airspace redesign

RNP 1

En Route RNAV Projects

56 - ASA Routes$2 Million

37 - Multi-Center Routes$2.6 Million

104 - ACA Routes$4.1 Million

6 - West Coast Routes$455 Thousand

Total Annual Airline Reported Savings = $30.8 Million

“Q” RoutesProvide RNAV Routing

for Gulf of Mexico Savings $21.6 Million

18

Procedures and Surveys

19

Procedure Production Schedule Available Via FAA GPS Website• Available at http://avn.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=nfpo/production• Also, available at http://gps.faa.gov/CapHill/index.htm

20

Interference Detection and Risk Mitigation

21

GPS Interference Detection and Location

22

Air Traffic

23

Overview

• LAAS Program Commissioning 6 LRIP Systems

– Memphis, Phoenix, Houston, Seattle, Chicago, Juneau

• One of the Fundamental Benefits Users Expect from LAAS is Ability to Fly Complex Procedures

• Purpose of this Meeting is to Establish a Plan for Implementing Complex Procedures at the 6 LRIP Airports

24

Background

• AND-720 has been Meeting with LAAS Users, Air Traffic Representatives, and Procedure Developers to Better Define Anticipated LAAS Benefits

Understand Desired LAAS Operations

Establish What the OIT Can and Can Not Do to Implement Those Operations

• Goal is to Develop Consensus on Projects to Implement Desired LAAS Operations

25

Background

• Kick-off Meeting Held in Arlington, VA (April)

• Second Meeting Memphis, TN (April)

• Third Meeting Chicago, IL (July)

• Fourth Meeting Chicago, IL (August)

Develop Requirements for Specific LAAS Procedures at Chicago

• Additional Meetings being Considered for each LAAS LRIP Airport

26

Site Coordinators

• Each Site has a Primary and Backup Coordinator– Facilitate the Development of the Advanced

Procedures• Assist AND-720 Establish a Development Team

for Each LRIP Airport

• Coordinate with the Airports and Regions (Following Site Visits by AND-710 and AND-720)

• Coordinate Development Team Meetings and Activities

• Refine Detailed Schedules for Each Site, Track Progress and Ensure Schedules are Being Met

• Identify Issues

27

LRIP CoordinatorsMemphis• Bob Beal• Campbell Motley

Juneau• Bob Beal• Campbell Motley

Houston• Tracey Golden • Tim Roe

Phoenix• Tim Roe• Paul Ewing

Chicago• Jeff Cochrane• Larry Oliver

Seattle• Rich Cole• Paul Wagoner

28

Top Level Complex Procedure Development Schedule

2 0 0 52 0 0 3 2 0 0 4

111 0 1 2 1 76 9832 54

2 0 0 2111 0 1 2 1 76 9832 54111 0 1 2 1 76 9832 54

D ev e lo p L A A S E C P L A A S S y stem In sta lls

A T C O p era tio n a l P ro ced u res D ev e lo p /C o n d u ct A T C T ra in in g

R eg u la tio n s

D ev e lo p /C o m m iss io n C o m p lex P ro ced u res

E sta b lish T E R P S C riter ia

F lig h t In sp ectio n P rep a ra tio n s

D ev e lo p A v io n ics S ta n d a rd s

V a lid a te P ro ced u res , O p s C o n cep t, F A S , A v io n ics

L T F M o d ifica tio n s

P ro to ty p e A v io n ics

P ro to ty p e P ro ced u res

D ev e lo p F A S P a ra m eters

O p s C o n cep t F in a l O p s C o n cep t

F in a l F A S P a ra m eters

111 0 1 2 1 32

2 0 0 6

P rep a re/F lig h t In sp ect/P u b lish P ro ced u res

29

Follow-On Activities

• Develop a Chicago Specific Project Plan– Initial Focus on Guided Descending Approach to 09L– Incrementally Addressing Entire Procedure –

Reduced Separation, Missed Approach, Guidance

• Task Leads– Review Task Details

• Ensure All Sub-Tasks Addressed• Ensure Schedule is Realistic

– Submit Project Plans and Resource Requirements to Cover FY03 Tasks

• Schedule Site Visits (AND-710, 720) and Coordinator Coordination

30

Triple Convergence Approach – Chicago O’Hare

Chicago2.exe

Double click executable to play file

31

Guided Complex Approach to 09L

FAF 09L

Leg 1Leg 2

LAASFAS

7 nm

9.5 nm

6 NM2.5 nmRadiusRF Leg

Leg 3

FAF 09L

Leg 1Leg 2

LAASFAS

7 nm

9.5 nm

6 NM2.5 nmRadiusRF Leg

Leg 3

04R

09R

09L

FAF

FAF

17 nm

7 nm

12 nm 5 nm

Complex Guidance

“VISUAL WITHINTENSIVEVECTORING”

04L

04R

09R

09L

FAF

FAF

17 nm

7 nm

12 nm 5 nm

Complex Guidance

“VISUAL WITHINTENSIVEVECTORING”

04L

32

Schedule Level 1_1

2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4

In itia l O p s C o n cep t (2 .1 )

2 0 0 2

111 0 1 2 1 2111 0 1 2 1 76 9832 54

M em p h is (3 .1 )

P ro jectP la n n in g (1 )

P ro to ty p e P ro ced u res (3 )

P h o en ix (3 .2 )

S ea ttle (3 .3 )

H o u sto n (3 .4 )

C h ica g o (3 .5 )

J u n ea u (3 .6 )

E sta b lish D ev elo p m en t T ea m

D ev elo p C o n cep tu a l P ro ced u res

D ev elo p P ro to ty p e P ro ced u res

C h a rt P ro ced u res

In itia l F A S P a ra m eters (4 )

E sta b lish P a ra m eters

C o o rd in a te w / R T C A /A R IN C

33

Schedule Level 1_2

2 0 0 32 0 0 2

111 0 1 2111 0 1 2 1 76 9832 54

M M R W A A S D elta (5 .4 )

P ro to ty p e A v io n ics (5 )

L T F a n d V D B M o d s

E sta b lish A rch itectu res (5 .1 , .2 , .3 )

S O W

P relim in a ry D esig n V a lid a tio n T estin g

L A A S T est F a c ility (6 )

D ev e lo p P ro to ty p e U p lin k S ta n d a rd

C o n tra ct A w a rd

C ritica l D esig n

In itia l S o ftw a reF in a l S o ftw a re

M M R L A A S (5 .5 )

M M R L A A S + F M S C a rd (5 .6 )

F M S M o d ifica tio n s (5 .7 )

P ro to ty p e U p lin k S ta n d a rd

V a lid a tio n T estsF in a l S o ftw a re

In itia l S o ftw a re

34

Schedule Level 1_3

2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4

O p s C o n cep t, F A S P a ra m eters , D a ta b a se (7 .7 , 7 .8 , 7 .9 )

111 0 1 2 1176 98 325 4

M em p h is (7 .1 )

V a lid a te C o m p lex P ro ced u re Im p lem en ta tio n , F A S P a ra m eters , O p s C o n cep t, D a ta b a se Im p lem en ta tio n , a n d A v io n ics A rch itectu res (7 )

P h o en ix (7 .2 )

C h ica g o (3 .5 )

J u n ea u (7 .6 )

V a lid a tio n P la n n in g (7 .1 .1 -7 .1 .6 )D a ta C o llectio n (7 .1 .7 .1 )

D a ta A n a ly sis (7 .1 .7 .2 - 7 .1 .7 .4 )

111 0 1 276 985

2 0 0 5

S ea ttle (7 .3 )

H o u sto n (7 .4 )

D a ta C o llectio n /A n a ly sis

P la n n in g C o o rd in a te /F in a lize

A v io n ics A rch itectu res (7 .1 0 - 7 .1 3 )

D a ta C o llectio n /A n a ly sis

P la n n in g C o o rd in a te /F in a lize

35

Schedule Level 1_4

2 0 0 4

1 32 4

M em p h is P ro ced u re (9 .4 .6 .1 )

D ev e lo p /C o m m iss io n C o m p lex P ro ced u res (9 )

D a ta C o llec tio n

D ev e lo p /V a lid a te T E R P S C riter ia (9 .1 )

111 0 1 276 985

2 0 0 5

1 32 4 111 0 1 276 985

D a ta A n a ly s is

P ro cess /P u b lish

F lig h t In sp ectio n (9 .2 /9 .3 )

A v io n icsF lig h t T est/S T C /T ra in

D ev e lo p /C o m m iss io n P ro ced u res (9 .4 )

R A P T /N A P T C o o rd in a tio n(9 .4 .1 , .2 )

(1 0 /1 /0 3 )

(1 0 /1 /0 3 )

(1 0 /1 /0 3 )

(1 0 /1 /0 3 )

D ev e lo p /P rep a re fo r P u b lica tio n

S u b m it

F lig h t In sp ect

T ra n sm itta l L etter

C o m m isio nM em p h is

C A IM em p h is

P u b lish P ro ced u re

P h o en ix P ro ced u re (9 .4 .6 .2 )

IA P A S o ftw a re (9 .4 .3 )

A V N T ra in in g (9 .4 .4 , 9 .4 .5 )

C o m m isio nP h o en ix

C A IP h o en ix