=1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model ·...

18
– Natacha GO [email protected] NEUTRALISING ANTIBODIES PREVENT PRRS V VIREMIA REBOUND: EVIDENCE FROM A DATA - SUPPORTED MODEL PhD seminar, 10 th April 2017 In collaboration with Suzanne TOUZEAU, ISA, INRA & BIOCORE, Inria, Sophia Antipolis, France Catherine BELLOC, BioEpAR, Oniris & INRA, Nantes, France Andrea WILSON, Div. Genetics and Genomics, Roslin Institute , Edinburgh, Scotland

Transcript of =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model ·...

Page 1: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

– Natacha GO –[email protected]

NEUTRALISING ANTIBODIES PREVENT PRRSV

VIREMIA REBOUND:EVIDENCE FROM A DATA-SUPPORTED MODEL

PhD seminar, 10th April 2017

In collaboration withSuzanne TOUZEAU, ISA, INRA & BIOCORE, Inria, Sophia Antipolis, FranceCatherine BELLOC, BioEpAR, Oniris & INRA, Nantes, FranceAndrea WILSON, Div. Genetics and Genomics, Roslin Institute , Edinburgh, Scotland

Page 2: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

ContextPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSv):

– Targets the porcine antigen presenting cells (APC)

– Wide variability in virulence & susceptibility

– Numerous vaccines, but only partially protective

⇒ Need to better understand the immune response

Viral titer rebounds:

From PHGC data

Vir

al ti

ter

– Mechanisms unclear (immune response,viral mutation, re-exposure over infection)

– Issue for the infection control (vaccination,genetic selection, population dynamics)

⇒What immune mechanisms can cause rebounds ?

2

Page 3: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

Linking immune response & infection dynamics

– Contrasted immune reponses can result in similar infection dynamics:

01

23

45

02

46

8

050

150

−20 0 20 40

01

23

45

−20 0 20 400

24

68

−20 0 20 40

050

150

Cytotoxic T-cellsViremia Pro-inf cytokines

strain:

strain:

experi

menta

l st

udie

s: -

Dia

z et

al. 2

01

2;

- W

eese

ndro

p e

t al.,

20

13

– Fragmented & partial view from the experimental studies– High variability & complex system

→ ORIGINAL MODEL: Integrative view of the within-host dynamics

3

Page 4: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

(1) initiation of infection & immune response

naive target cells APCn(innate immunity)

APCm

V viral particles

APCi

viral particles decay

Innate responseearly & non-specific

Infection Excretion

Phagocytosis

viral particles multiplication

Exp

osur

e

4

Page 5: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

(2) virus-immune response interactions

naive target cells APCn

natural killerscytotoxic lymphocytes

neutralising antibodies

NK

IgAPCm

V

CD8+

APCi

viral particles decay

Innate responseearly & non-specific

Adaptive responsedelayed & specific

Neutralisation

Infection Excretion

Cytolysis

Phagocytosis

viral particles multiplication

viral particles decay

infected cells decay

4

Page 6: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

(3) immune response activation & regulations

CD4+APCm

APCi

B

APCn

NK

IgAPCm

V

CD8+

APCi

Neutralisation

Infection Excretion

Antigen presentation

Cytolysis

Phagocytosis

Cyt

ok

ines

Cyt

ok

ines

4

Page 7: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

Model - overview

Integrative and detailed view of the within-host dynamics

ModelODE system describing the evolution over time of each

component of interest by the formalisation of the immune

mechanisms

Parametersfixed values ~ rate of immune mechanisms

Dynamics of:- PRRSv- Immune effectors- Antibodies- Cytokines

– evolution over time of PRRSv, innate and adaptive components

– deterministic system of 19 ODE involving 50 parameters

– mechanisms at between-cell scale, variability ∼ parameter values

5

Page 8: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

Model - equations

example of viral dynamics:

APCm

V

APCi

Cyt

okin

es

APCn

Ig

V̇ =+ E(t)︸︷︷︸exposure

− ηT V (APCn + APCm) κ−() [1 + κ+()]︸ ︷︷ ︸

phagocytosis

− βT V (APCm + APCn) κ−() [1 + κ+()]︸ ︷︷ ︸

infection

+ eT APCi κ−()︸ ︷︷ ︸

excretion

− µadV V Ig︸ ︷︷ ︸

neutralisation

− µnatV V︸ ︷︷ ︸

natural decay

6

Page 9: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?

Data. 300 pigs (genomic variability), NVSL strain (high virulence)

0 10 20 30 40

110

102

103

104

105

106

107

0 10 20 30 40

110

102

103

104

105

106

107

uniphasic biphasic

Method.

(1) Model fitting

(2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies)

7

Page 10: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?

Data.

Method.

(1) Model fitting1. Selection of parameters: linked to between-host variability (14/50)2. Check if the model can generate the data3. Fitting method. 600 times the fitting process / profile:

Parameter set 1Parameter set 2 ...Parameter set s

Model

DataRejectedSelected

Viral titer 1Viral titer 2 ...Viral titer s

1

2

s

Start

End

(2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies)

7

Page 11: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?Data.

Method.

(1) Model fitting

Fitted viral titer:

0 10 20 30 40

01e

21e

41e

61e

8 peak

resolution

0 10 20 30 40

01e

21e

41e

61e

8 peakrebound (max)

rebound (min)

uniphasic biphasic

(2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies)7

Page 12: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?Data.

Method.

(1) Model fitting

(2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies)

Modelestimated parameters

(2 x 600 sets)synthesis of Ig

resulting dynamics(2 x 600 sets)

titer of Ig

cummulated flow(2 x 600 sets)

total # of neutralised viral particles:

0

20

21

42

0-20 >20

7

Page 13: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?

peak

Gro

ss fl

ow

rati

o/t

ot.

deacyIg

synth

esi

s

0-20 >20 0-20 >20

Modelestimated parametersuniphasic vs biphasic

resulting dynamicsuniphasic vs biphasic

cummulated flowsuniphasic vs biphasic

titer

(1) Rebounds due to a lack of antibodies synthesis

→ strength of neutralisation determines infection profiles?

8

Page 14: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?

peak

Gro

ss fl

ow

rati

o/t

ot.

deacyIg

synth

esi

s

0-20 >20 0-20 >20

Modelestimated parametersuniphasic vs biphasic

resulting dynamicsuniphasic vs biphasic

cummulated flowsuniphasic vs biphasic

titer

(2) Lower Ig titer despite similar synthesis !?!?!

→ strength of neutralisation determines infection profiles?

8

Page 15: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?

peak

Gro

ss fl

ow

rati

o/t

ot.

deacyIg

synth

esi

s

0-20 >20 0-20 >20

Modelestimated parametersuniphasic vs biphasic

resulting dynamicsuniphasic vs biphasic

cummulated flowsuniphasic vs biphasic

titer

(3) Rebounders need more neutralising antibodies !!!

→ strength of neutralisation determines infection profiles?

8

Page 16: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

What prevents rebounds?

Influence of pomoting / inhibiting neutralisation efficiency on profile

Method: vary µadV Results: % of profile inversion

levels uniphasic biphasicL1 ×0.1 ×10↓ ↓ ↓L6 ×0.001 ×1000

levels uni→ bi bi→ uniL1↓ 0 85L6

⇓strength of neutralisation do not determines infection profile

... BUT ...high neutralisation can prevent rebounds !

8

Page 17: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

ConclusionStrengths:

•Model: can reproduce the variability within and between PRRSv profiles

• Approach: powerfull to identify underlying mechanismsExpe.: only dynamics→ expensive & partial view• Results: new insights to explain PRRSv within-host dynamics→ prospects for infection control (vaccination & host genetic selection)

Limits:

• Only fitted on viral titer (1 model variable / 19)• No validation of fixed parameters & ranges

Prospects:

• Model simplification (Stefano’s method)• Exploration of other hypotheses (viral mutation, re-exposure)

9

Page 18: =1= Neutralising antibodies prevent PRRSv viremia rebound: evidence from a data-supported model · (1) Model fitting (2) Identify the underlying mechanisms (ex. of antibodies) Model

INTRODUCTION MODEL RESULTS CONCLUSION

Thank you!

CD4+APCm

APCi

B

APCn

NK

IgAPCm

V

CD8+

APCi

Neutralisation

Infection Excretion

Antigen presentation

Cytolysis

Phagocytosis

Cyt

ok

ines

Cyt

ok

ines

10