1 NEGOTIATION OF THE MFF 2014-2020 PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES APRIL 2015.
-
Upload
sheena-park -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 NEGOTIATION OF THE MFF 2014-2020 PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES APRIL 2015.
1
NEGOTIATION OF THE MFF 2014-2020PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES
APRIL 2015
2
NEGOTIATION OF THE
MFF 2014-2020
GLOBAL RESULT: TOTALGLOBAL RESULT: TOTAL
920.000
930.000
940.000
950.000
960.000
970.000
980.000
990.000
1.000.000
1.010.000
1.020.000
1.030.000
1.040.000
1.050.000
1.060.000
1.070.000
TOTAL
Periodo 07-13 Comisión Van Rompuy I Van Rompuy II Resultado final
RESULTADO GLOBAL: RUBRICASRESULTADO GLOBAL: RUBRICAS
0
40.000
80.000
120.000
160.000
200.000
240.000
280.000
320.000
360.000
Competitividad CEF Cohesión PAC ayudas FEADER y otros CIUDADANÍA Acción Exterior Administración FUERA MFP
Periodo 07-13 Comisión Van Rompuy I Van Rompuy II Resultado final
GLOBAL RESULT: TOTAL BY HEADING
GLOBAL RESULT: TOTAL BY HEADING
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Spain GNI per head pps (%UE 27)
AMECO Forecast
NEGOTIATION PROCESS (1)
RNB OF
-567 -0,0293 0,27
801 0,22-780 -0,03
-9.424 -0,03-1 0,08
2.218 0,232.401 0,523.231 0,04
-2.889 -0,021.345 0,00
181 0,17-142 -0,30-17 0,07904 1,74174 0,24
7 0,06-1.453 -0,03
-48 -0,01929 0,19509 0,16-63 0,0574 0,09
-25 0,04237 0,00
-1.671 -0,043.904 -0,02
74 0,17
Negotiating Box de 22 de Noviembre
Rúbrica 1a se ajusta a 152652, menos los 36,249 del CEF, que a su vez a incluye 10.000 de Fondo Cohesion. Se incluye ITER y GMES
Cohesion se reduce según propuesta de la Comisión y se incluye el Fund for Deprived people
Agricultura se limita a 364,472 de los que 269,852 son ayudas directas y gastos de mercado, se incluye el Fondo para crisis agricola
Rubrica 3 se reduce a 18.309, R4 a 65.650, R5 a 62,629 y Fuera del marco solo quedan las reservas que suman 9,070 Croacia
Reino Unido
HungríaMaltaPaíses BajosAustriaPoloniaPortugalRumaniaEsloveniaEslovaquiaFinlandiaSuecia
Luxemburgo
BulgariaChequiaDinamarcaAlemania EstoniaIrlandaGreciaEspañaFranciaItaliaChipreLetoniaLituania
Bélgica
Dife
renc
ia
sald
o
% P
IBSimulación
Diferencias con la propuesta de la Presidencia NB -0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00
BélgicaBulgariaChequia
DinamarcaAlemania
EstoniaIrlandaGrecia
EspañaFrancia
ItaliaChipre
LetoniaLituania
LuxemburgoHungría
MaltaPaíses Bajos
AustriaPolonia
PortugalRumania
EsloveniaEslovaquia
FinlandiaSuecia
Reino UnidoCroacia
Diferencias con la propuesta de la Presidencia en % PIB
NEGOTIATION PROCESS (2)
EUROPEAN STRUCTURAL AND INVESTMENT FUNDS-SPAIN
MFF NEGOTIATIONS: CONCLUSIONSMFF NEGOTIATIONS: CONCLUSIONS
Along the negotiations, Spain has improved its
allocation in Cohesion Policy compared to the initial
proposal of the Commission. Specially due to YEI.
CAP: in nominal terms, the financial allocations do not
vary compared to the present period. Also, there is an
additional allocation in EARDF for Spain of 500 M€.
The reduction in other headings, as well as the
modifications included in the budget’s revenue side,
have improved considerably the net result and net
balance for Spain in the next programming period.
MID TERM REVIEWMID TERM REVIEW
In 2016 the Commission will revise the financial allocations to MMSS under the Cohesion Policy in the “Investment for Growth and Jobs Objective”.
Using more recent statistics available at that moment: comparing GDP data observed in 2014-2015 with GDP in 2012
The Commission will adjust the financial allocations to those MMSS in which the accumulated difference exceeds +/- 5 %.
The net effect of these adjustments will not exceed 4.000 million €.
FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONSFINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS
Spain: 36.130 million € ERDF, ESF, EARDF FOR 2014-2020:
o 19.393 million € ERDF.
o 8.446 million € ESF.
o 8.291 million € EARDF.
o 1.162 million € EMFF
o 643 M€ Territorial Cooperation
Including 943 million € of the YEI added to ESF.
NEW PROGRAMMING PERIOD 2014-2020
12
Investment for growth and
jobs objective: 313.197 M€
Less developed regions: 164.279 M€
Transition regions: 31.677 M€
Regiones más desarrolladas: 49.492 M€
MMSS receiving
support from CF:
66.362 M€
Outermost regions: 1.386
M€
MULTIANNUAL FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK: COHESION POLICY
13
Headline 1b – Economic, social and territorial cohesionCOHESION POLICY: total financial allocations1. Investment for growth and jobs
330 M€:Innovative
actions (sustainable
urban development)
14
Headline 1b – Economic, social and territorial cohesionCOHESION POLICY: total financial allocations2. European territorial cooperation
European territorial
cooperation: 8.948 M€
Cross border cooperation:
6.627 M€
Transnational cooperation:
1.822 M€
Inter regional
cooperation: 500 M€
MARCO FINANCIERO PLURIANUAL:POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN
15
WHERE DO WE COME FROM?WHERE DO WE COME FROM?
1986-1988 1989-1993 1994-1999 2000-2006 2007-2013 2014-2020(prov)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund in Spain(M€ 2004)
1986-1988 1989-1993 1994-1999 2000-2006 2007-2013
Fondos Estructurales (FEDER+FSE) 4.822 18.707 35.469 42.050 28.126 20.099Fondo de Cohesión 0 0 9.574 12.322 3.146 0TOTAL 4.822 18.707 45.043 54.372 31.272 20.099
16
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC COHESION : EVOLUTIONSOCIAL AND ECONOMIC COHESION : EVOLUTION
16
HOW WILL ESI FUNDS BE ALLOCATED?
18
CATEGORIES OF REGIONS AND
COFINANCING RATES
19
COFINANCING RATES
WHY REFORMING COHESION POLICY?
Stronger
focus on
results
Maximize the
impact of the
Funds
To respond to these challenges:
Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 has been revised
and modified for the next period
Achieve EU2020
objectives: smart,
sustainable and inclusive growth
PROGRAMMING STRUCTURE
21
• Developed by the Commission• Defines strategic priorities and territorial
challenges in coherence with EU2020
• Similar to NSRF 2007-2013• Developed by each MS• Translates the elements of CSF to the national
context• Describes the national strategy aimed at achieving
the Union objectives through the ESI Funds
• CSF and PA will be implemented through operational programs
• Developed in close collaboration with partners (partnership principle)
Contrato de AsociaciónContrato de Asociación
ProgramasOperativos
Contrato de Asociación
ProgramasOperativos
Contrato de Asociación
Operational Programs
Partnership Agreement
CommonStrategic
Framework
SHCEDULE
22
December 20th 2013
Regulationsapproved
(+4 months)
Abril 22nd 2013
PA and OPs
July 22nd 2014
OPs + Ex Ante Eval + RIS 3
(+3 months) (+6 months)
December 2014February 2015
July 2015POs approved
y the COM
October 30th 2014PA approvedby the COM
NEW ELEMENTS IN COHESION POLICY 2014-2020
THEMATIC OBJECTIVESInvestment prioritiesSpecific objectives (to be defined by each MMSS)
THEMATIC CONCENTRATIONERDF-ESFLOW CARBON ECONOMY (LCE)R&D&I, ICT, SMEs, LCE5% Integrated Sustainable Urban Development
FOCUS ON RESULTSPerformance reservePerformance framework
EX ANTE CONDITIONALITY
PRIVATE EXPENDITURE
THEMATIC OBJECTIVES AND THEMATIC CONCENTRATION
24
ERDF ESF THEMATIC OBJECTIVE
1) R&D&innovation
2) ICT
3) SMEs
4) Low Carbon Economy
5) Climate change and risk prevention
6) Environment and efficiency in consumption of resources
7) Transport
8) Employment
9) Social inclusion, poverty and non discrimination
10) Education
11) Institutional capacity
THEMATIC OBJECTIVES
25
26
CATEGORIES OF REGIONS AND THEMATIC CONCENTRATION
27
TOTAL REGIONS CENTRAL ADM LOCAL
Less developed regions and outermost regions
R&D&i, ICT, SMEs and LCE 50% 45% 55,3% 50%
LCE 12% 4% 9% 50%
Transition regions, former convergence regions and former phasing out
R&D&i, ICT, SMEs and LCE 60% 55% 66% 50%
LCE 15% 6% 16,9% 50%
More developed regions not included before
R&D&i, ICT, SMEs and LCE 80% 75% 93,6% 50%
LCE 20% 9% 32,5% 50%
THEMATIC CONCENTRATION
THEMATIC CONCENTRATION
28
LOW CARBON ECONOMY
Less developed and outermost
Transition and ex convergence More developed TOTAL
Regional OPs 4,4 10,7 14,6 11,1Multi-regional OPs 29,2 21,6 28,9 24,6Spain 17,5 16,5 21,0 18,0
Minimum share 12 15 20 15,9
I+D+i TIC PYMEs EBC
Less developed and outermost
Transition and ex convergence More developed TOTAL
Regional OPs 55,5 57,6 84,2 65,8Multi-regional OPs 56,2 64,5 86,2 68,7Spain 56,0 61,3 85,1 67,3
Minimum share 50 60 80 63,9
SHIFT IN THEMATIC PRIORITIES
29
OT 1 OT 2 OT 3 OT 4 OT 5 OT 6 OT 70
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2007-2013 2014-2020
THE PROGRAMMING PROCESS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
30
PROGRAMMING PROCESS
Funds Coordination Group (ERDF, ESF, EARDF, EMFF)Development of PASynergies among ESI Funds: during programming
and executionAnalysis of management structure (authorities…)
Synergies among ESI Funds and other EU policies and instruments:i.e. R&D&innovation – Horizon 2020, COSME
Working group: monitoring, evaluation and indicators
Working group: information systems
PROGRAMMING PROCESS
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES AND SWOT ANALYSIS
INTERVENTION PROPOSALS
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
RESULTSIndicators, milestones,
targets
• MINISTRIES• REGIONS• ESI FUNDS• PARTNERS
• EU2020• CSRs Spain• Position paper• Atlantic Strategy
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
1. INTRODUCTION
2. SOCIOECONOMIC CONTEXT
3. GENERAL ISSUES
4. ANALISIS BY THEMATIC OBJECTIVES
5. OUTERMOST REGION: CANARY ISLANDS
6. MAIN RESULTS OF EX ANTE EVALUATION OF PA
7. SELECTED THEMATIC OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED RESULTS
8. FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM EU AT NATIONAL LEVEL
9. HORIZONTAL PRINCIPLES AND POLICY OBJECTIVES
10. LIST OF PROGRAMMES AND INDICATIVE ALLOCATION BY FUND AND YEAR
11. COORDINATION AMONG ESI FUNDS AND WITH OTHER EU INSTRUMENTS
12. SUMMARY OF THE FULFILLMENT OF EAC
13. PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
14. INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
15. REDUCTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN
16. INTEGRATED APPROACH IN THE USE OF ESI FUNDS
17. ELECTRONIC DATA EXCHANGE
DEVELOPMENT OF PA
1. EAC: Complete revision at national level. Single document. Identifying responsible bodies at national or regional level.
2. Context analysis for all TOs. Definition of specific objectives.
3. Implementation of partnership principle in line with the European Code of Conduct.
4. Definition of the participation of Local Entities: Integrated Urban Development
5. Use of ITIs and CLLD
34
ANALYSIS OF
DISPARITIES BY
THEMATIC OBJECTIVE
35
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES BY TO
ANALISIS OF DISPARITIES IN OT1: R&D&I
1. Quantitative analysis
2. Distance to EU2020 objectives
3. NRP 2013
4. SWOT Analysis
5. Intervention proposals
6. Investment priorities and specific objectives
1. Quantitative Analysis at EU level
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES BY TO
2. Distance to EU 2020 objectives
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES BY TO
3. R&D&innovation in the NRP 2013
Foster knowledge and excellence and the participation of the private sector, especially
SMEs in the R&D&innovation system
ActionsNational Agency for R&DNational Strategy of Science, Technology and
innovation 2013-2020.
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES BY TO
FORTALEZAS OPORTUNIDADES
Capacidades de I+D+i disponibles en Universidades, OPIs, y centros de I+D. El incremento del número de investigadores y personal de I+D+i que permite
disponer de una masa crítica de científicos y técnicos. El acceso a infraestructuras científicas y tecnológicas avanzadas. La creación de infraestructuras de comunicaciones avanzadas. Elevado porcentaje de población con educación superior.
Nuevo marco normativo: Ley de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación 14/2011. El posicionamiento geoeconómico y el papel de las universidades, centros de I+D y
empresas españolas en América Latina, Norte de África, etc. El desarrollo científico y tecnológico en áreas con un elevando potencial para el
liderazgo empresarial. Existencia sinergias debido a la coordinación entre los agentes de I+D+i y
colaboración público-privada. Liderazgo empresarial en sectores con recorrido para la innovación. La especialización regional inteligente a partir de sus capacidades productivas,
formativas e I+D+i
DEBILIDADES AMENAZAS
Baja intensidad del esfuerzo en I+D en relación al PIB. El gasto empresarial I+D y tasas de ocupación de personal de I+D+i en empresas
inferiores a la media europea. Disparidades regionales en materia de I+D+i. La ineficiencia de los instrumentos de transferencia y gestión del conocimiento
y las bajas capacidades de absorción de las PYMEs Reducido número de empresas involucradas en actividades de I+D+i de forma
sistemática y el tamaño de las mismas. Baja consideración de los empresarios españoles hacia la I+D+i como elemento
esencial para la competitividad La I+D de las universidades y de los centros públicos de investigación no está
suficientemente orientada hacia las necesidades empresariales. Insuficiente utilización del potencial de la compra pública para impulsar el
desarrollo tecnológico y la innovación. El potencial científico y tecnológico del sistema público de I+D no es
aprovechado suficientemente por las empresas españolas. Falta de cooperación entre las pymes para promover proyectos y actuaciones a
favor de la innovación.
La crisis financiera y la ausencia de oportunidades crediticias para el desarrollo de actividades de I+D+i.
Adopción de medidas para la estabilidad presupuestaria y control del déficit público con un impacto negativo en la capacidad de financiación de la I+D+i de las Administraciones Públicas.
El bajo número de empresas innovadoras y en sectores de media y alta tecnología. La competencia internacional creciente en materia de recursos, talento, tecnología
y atracción de inversiones en I+D+i. El deterioro de la competitividad y posición innovadora de España. Dificultades de las empresas innovadoras para acceder a nuevos mercados o
mantener las cuotas de liderazgo alcanzadas frente a competencia internacional. La caída, desde 2010, de la inversión en I+D+i tanto por parte de las
Administraciones públicas como del sector empresarial El sistema de innovación aún no ha alcanzado su masa crítica, encontrándose lejos
de su rendimiento óptimo
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES BY TOSWOT ANALYSIS
4. Intervention proposalsSpain: moderate innovator: must reinforce its innovation
systemIncrease R&D investment: in order to increase
competitivenessIncrease participation of the private sector in R&DPromote R&D actions to respond to societal challenges.Promote innovative public procurement.Improve infrastructures and capacities of R&D (especially
ESFRI and ICTs)Technology transfer public-private sectors
ANALYSIS OF DISPARITIES BY TO
THEMATIC OBJECTIVEINVESTMENT PRIORITYSPECIFIC OBJECTIVE
TO1. R&D
PI1. Promote private R&D investment
SO. R&D actions to respond to
societal challenges
Necessary to define one result indicator for each SO.
Must be coherent with output indicators and financial allocations of each SO.
PROGRAMMING: STRUCTURE AND INTERNAL LOGIC
43
PROGRAMMING CYCLE
AXISThematic
ObjectivesInvestment priorities
Specific Objectives
RegulationsMS MS
47
TERRITORIAL CHALLENGES
INTEGRATED TERRITORIAL INVESTMENTS (ITIS)
• A territorial approach in PA and OPs is required by the regulations. Not only a sectorial approach
• Tools like ITIs can be used by MMSS on a voluntary basis.
• Based on an integrated territorial strategy.• Can be applied to any territory inside a region or
including several regions.• It includes resources of at least 2 priority axis,
one or several funds (also including EARDF and EMFF).
MAIN PRIORITIES AND
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMS
FOR 2014-2020
49
• TO1: R&D&i 4.400 million €: will be applied to the National Strategy of R&D&I at national level and to the RIS3 strategies at regional level.
• TO2: ICT 2.000 million €: Digital Agenda of Spain. In particular to Next Generation Access Networks (>30 Mbps, >100 Mbps) and to projects which improve the digital economy in Spain: e-Government, e-Administration, e-Health, e-Education, as well as projects to improve competitiveness of enterprises.
ERDF: MAIN PRIORITIES
• TO3: SMEs 2.800 million € to promote internationalization of SMEs and improve their access to finance. Promotion of entrepreneurship in line with the new Law 14/2013 for entrepreneurs and internationalization.
• 800 million € will be dedicated to the “SME Initiative”, a centralized financial instrument managed by the Commission and the EIB. Both the central administration and the regions will take part in this OP.
ERDF: MAIN PRIORITIES
• TO4: LCE 3.200 million € Projects aimed at improving energy efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions in all sectors (public buildings, industry and housing sector), and reducing Spain’s energy dependence. Specially in urban areas.
ERDF: MAIN PRIORITIES
These TOs (1 to 4) represent the majority of ERDF resources (due to thematic concentration) approx.
63% of the total at national level.
• TO6: Environment 1.700 million € to promote environmental protection and water treatment projects in order to fulfill the Water Directive.
• TO7: Transport 2.700 million €: Trans European Network projects, to eliminate bottlenecks in main corridors. Railway projects mainly.
ERDF: MAIN PRIORITIES
54
Allocation by TO TOTAL ERDF PROGRAMS
TO 1. R&D&INNOVATION 4.330.411.311
TO 2. ICT 1.929.453.265
TO 3. SME 2.878.232.464
TO 4. LCE 3.109.719.030
TO 5. CLIMATE CHANGE AND RISK PREVENTION 269.265.178
TO 6. ENVIRONMENT 1.860.391.185
TO 7 . TRANSPORT 2.630.250.300
TO 8. EMPLOYMENT 62.874.949
TO 9. SOCIAL INCLUSION 363.847.097
TO 10. EDUCATION 537.647.347
TO 11. INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY -
TO 12. SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT 771.295.638
TO 12.4 URBAN DEVELOPMENT UNDER TO4 209.428.859
INTEGRATED URBAN DEVELOPMENT 980.724.497
TO13. OUTERMOST REGIONS 482.190.559
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 189.326.593TOTAL 19.414.904.916
FINANCIAL ALLOCATION BY TO (ERDF PROGRAMS)
• TO8: Employment 5.000 million € to face the main problem in Spain: unemployment, specially youth unemployment. In this objective 943 M€ will be assigned from the YEI, and an identical amount will be allocated from ESF. In total 1.886 M€.
• TO9: Social Inclusion 1.500 million € to promote social inclusion, combat poverty and discrimination.
• TO10: Education 1.700 million € to promote education and training.
ESF: MAIN PRIORITIES
56
Allocation by TO TOTAL ESF PROGRAMS
TO 1. R&D&INNOVATION
TO 2. ICT
TO 3. SME
TO 4. LCE
TO 5. CLIMATE CHANGE AND RISK PREVENTION
TO 6. ENVIRONMENT
TO 7 . TRANSPORT
TO 8. EMPLOYMENT 3.901.582.082
TO 9. SOCIAL INCLUSION 1.668.954.254
TO 10. EDUCATION 1.869.145.494
TO 11. INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
TO 12. SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT
TO 12.4 URBAN DEVELOPMENT UNDER TO4
INTEGRATED URBAN DEVELOPMENT
TO13. OUTERMOST REGIONS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 141.887.357TOTAL (MDP Fund and YEI not included) 7.581.569.187
FINANCIAL ALLOCATION BY TO (ESF PROGRAMS)
REGIONAL OPS AND NATIONAL OPS
57
Nº OPERATIONAL PROGRAM
SCOPE THEMATIC OBJECTIVES
1 Smart growth National R&D (1), ICT(2), SMEs (3)
1 Sustainable growth National LCE (4), Environment (6),
Transport (7), Urban Development (12)
19 Regional OPs Regional All
OP SMART GROWTH
58
TO PRIORITIES
1 In line with the objectives defined in the National Strategy for Reseach, Development and Innovation 2013-2020:• Investment in R&D infrastructure• Public investment in R&D projects• Private investment in R&D projects
2 In line with the priorities defined in the Spanish Digital Agenda:• e-Government and e-public services• Next generation access networks, in particular in rural areas
3 • Internationalization of SMEs• Access to finance
SG IDi
SETSI
CDTI
ICEX
OP SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
59
OT Priorities
6 In line with the priorities defined in the Water Treatment Directive :• Projects in waste water treatment plants. The ones included under sanction projects
7 Projects to improve competitiveness and eliminate bottlenecks. Multi modal transport. Railway projects.
4 Investments to increase efficiency and reduce consumptions of the Spanish electric system:• Connections between Iberian Peninsula and the islands.• Improve the transport and distribution systems.• Investments in order to comply with the Energy Efficiency Directive.
12 Integrated projects “URBAN”, which include several TOs, in which at least, 25% will finance LCE projects.Singular projects in LCE (not integrated).
MAGRAMA
FOMENTO
IDAE
ERDF NATIONAL PROGRAMSFINANCIAL ALLOCATION
PROGRAM FUND TOTAL €
OP Smart Growth ERDF 3.939.184.811
OP Sustainable Growth ERDF 5.526.680.403
OP SME Initiative ERDF 800.036.600
TOTAL (National OPs) ERDF 19.408.883.778
http://www.dgfc.sepg.minhap.es/
http://www.dgfc.sepg.minhap.es/
Thank you !
“A way of making Europe”
61