1 Metal Decontamination Techniques used in Decommissioning Activities Mathieu Ponnet SCKCEN.
-
Upload
kristin-fant -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 Metal Decontamination Techniques used in Decommissioning Activities Mathieu Ponnet SCKCEN.
1
Metal Decontamination Techniques used in Decommissioning Activities
Mathieu Ponnet
SCK•CEN
2
• Objectives and selection criteria• Full System Decontamination• Decontamination of components/parts• Conclusions
One detail example (BR3 case) in each part
Summary
3
Definition
• Decontamination is defined as the removal of contamination from surfaces by
Washing Heating Chemical or electrochemical action Mechanical action Others (melting…)
4
3 main reasons
• To remove the contamination from components to reduce dose level in the installation (save dose during dismantling)
• To minimize the potential for spreading contamination during decommissioning
• To reduce the contamination of components to such levels that may be Disposed of at a lower category Recycled or reused in the conventional
industry (clearance of material)
5
Decontamination for decommissioning
• In maintenance work, we must avoid any damage to the component for adequate reuse
• In decommissioning, decontamination techniques can be destructive, the main goal being the removal of as much activity as possible (high DF)
6
Decontamination before Dismantling
Objectives : Reduction of occupational Exposure
Pipe Line System Decontamination
Closed systemPool, Tank
Open system
Chemical Method
Mechanical method
Hydro jet Method
Blast Method
Strippable coating Method
7
Decontamination after Dismantling
Objectives : Reduction of radioactive waste or recycling
Pipes, Components
Open or closed system
Chemical Immersion Method
Electrochemical Method
Blast Method
Ultrasonic wave Method
Gel Method
8
Decontamination Of Building
Objectives : Reduction of radioactive concrete waste or Release of building
Concrete Surface
Mechanical Method
Scabbler
Shaver
Blast Method
Concrete Demolition
Explosives
Jackhammer
Drill &Spalling
9
Selecting a specific decontamination technique
• Need to be considered Safety: Not increase radiological or classical
hazards Efficiency: Sufficient DF to reach the objectives Cost-effectiveness: should not exceed the
cost for waste treatment and disposal Waste minimization: should not rise large
quantities of waste resulting in added costs, work power and exposure
Feasibility of industrialization: Should not be labour intensive, difficult to handle or difficult to automate.
10
Parameters for the selection of a decontamination process
• Type of plant and plant process• Operating history of the plant• Type of components: pipe, tank• Type of material: steel, Zr, concrete• Type of surface: rough, porous, coated…• Type of contaminants: oxide, crud, sludge…• Composition of the contaminant (activation products, actinides… and
radionuclide involved)• Ease of access to areas/plant, internal or external contaminated
surface• Decontamination factor required• Destination of the components after decontamination• Time required for application• Capability of treatment and conditioning of the secondary waste
generated
11
Some examples about the type of material
• Stainless steel: Resistant to corrosion, difficult to treat, needs a strong decontamination process to remove several µm • Carbon steel: Quite porous and low resistance to corrosion, needs a soft process but the contamination depth reaches several thousand µm (more secondary waste)• Concrete: The contamination will depend of the location and the history of the material, the contamination depth can be few mm to several cm.
12
Some examples about the type of surface
•Porous: Avoid wet techniques which are penetrant. •Coated: Do we have to remove paint ? (contamination level, determinant for the use of electrochemical techniques)•Presence of crud: what are the objectives ? (reduce the dose or faciliting the waste evacuation)
Right decontamination technique
13
Some examples about decontamination factor
required
Primary circuit of BWR and PWR reactors
Outer layer : Fe2O3, Iron rich
Intermediate layer (CRUD) : FeCr2O4, Cr2O3, Chromium rich
Base alloy : Fe, Cr, Ni
DF
1-5
5-50
50-10,000
Soft decontamination process
Thorough decontamination process
1-5 µm
2-10 µm
5 – 30 µm
Right decontamination technique
14
Pipes, tanks, pools…
Some examples about the type of components
Right decontamination technique
Decontamination in a closed system? (avoids the spreading of contamination…) Decontamination in an open system after dismantling? (secondary waste…) Connection to the components, dose rate, the total filling up of the component, auxiliary…
15
Some examples about the treatment of secondary waste
Availability of a facility to treat secondary waste from decontamination (chemical solutions, aerosols, debris, …) Final products (packaging, decontaminated effluent,…) have to be conform for final disposal. In decontamination processes, the final wastes are concentrated, representing a significant radiation source.
16
Overview of decontamination process for metals
• Chemical process In closed system (APCE, TURCO, CORD, SODP, EMMA,
LOMI, DFD, Foams or various reagents…) In open system on dismantled components (MEDOC,
Cerium/nitric acid, CANDEREM, DECOHA, DFDX or various reagents, HNO3, HCl, HF,…)
• Electrochemical process (open or close system) Phosphoric acid, Nitric acid, Oxalic or citric acid, sulfuric
acid or others process• Physical process (open system)
Wet or dry abrasives, Ultrasonic cleaning, HPW, CO2 ice blasting, others…
17
Decontamination Techniques Used in Decommissioning Activities
• Objectives and selection criteriaObjectives and selection criteria• Full system Decontamination
General consideration Chemical reagents Spent decontamination solutions Guidelines for selecting appropriate FSD The case of BR3 (CORD)
• Decontamination of components/partsDecontamination of components/parts• ConclusionsConclusions
18
Full system and closed system Decontamination
• Objectives Reduce the dose rate and avoid spreading of
contamination during dismantling Typical decontamination factor 5 to 40
• Application Decontamination of the primary circuit (RPV,PP, SG
and auxiliary circuits) directly after the shutdown of the reactor
Decontamination of components in a closed loop
• Practical objectives Remove the crud layer of about 5 to 10 µm inside the
primary circuit
19
Chemical process
• Chemical process commonly used CORD Chemical Oxidizing Reduction
Decontamination based on the used of permanganic acid (AP).
LOMI Low Oxidation State Metal Ion (AP) APCE Process based on the use of
permanganate in alkaline solution NITROX or CITROX based on the use of
nitric or citric acid. EPRI DFD (Decontamination For
Decommissioning) based on the use of fluoroborique acid.
Siemens
England
Russia
Westinghouse
EPRI
20
Multi-step decontamination process
• Oxidation step Oxidation of the insoluble chromium with
permanganate in alkaline or acidic media, Nitric acid or fluoroboric acid
• Decontamination step A dissolution step is carried out with oxalic acid to
dissolve the crud layer The reduction / dissolution step is enhanced by
complexing agent
• Purification step The excess of oxalic acid is removed using
permanganate or hydrogen peroxide The dissolved cations and the activity are removed
using Ion Exchange Resins.
21
Chemical reagent
MnO4-
HNO3
HBF4
H2C2O4
oxalatesanionic species
H2O2
CrIII to CrVI
CO2After destruction
Water
Oxidizing agent
for chromium oxide
Dissolving agent
Minimize secondary waste
Destruction agent
Minimize secondary waste
22
The Full System Decontamination of the primary system of the BR3-PWR reactor
with the Siemens CORD Process
Objectives• Reduce the radiation dose rate by a factor of 10• Remove the surface contamination, the so-called
CRUD to avoid dispersion of contamination during dismantling of contaminated loops
with a particular attention to:• Minimize the amount of secondary wastes• Minimize the radiation exposure of the workers• Minimize the modifications to be done to the plant
for the decontamination operation.
23
The BR3 primary loop
24
Full System Decontamination of the primary and auxiliary loops in 1991
• 3 Decontamination Cycles at 80 to 100 °C in 9 days
• For each cycle : 3 steps oxidation step with HMnO4
Reduction step with H2C2O4
Cleaning step with anionic and cationic IEX resins and removal of excess oxalic acid by oxidation with HMnO4 or with H2O2 on catalysts
CORD®: Chemical Oxidizing-Reducing Decontamination
25
Chemistry of the process
Oxidation Step with Permanganic Acid HMnO4 at 0.3 g/lFor the oxidation of the Chromium from Cr3+ to Cr6+
Temperature 100°C
Decontamination step with Oxalic Acid H2C2O4 at 3 g/lDissolution step for the hematite dissolution and the activity dissolution
Temperature 80°C to 100°C
Cleaning step: Destruction of the excess oxalic acid by oxidation with permanganic acid or with hydrogen peroxide on a catalyst
Combined with fixation of corrosion products on Ion Exchange resinsTemperature: 80 to 60°C (last cycle)
26
Process steps for each cycle
Step nr 1: OxidationInjection of permanganic acid
Circulation during several hours
Step nr 2: Reduction + Decontamination
Injection of oxalic acid - CirculationPurification on ion exchange
Step nr 3: Cleaning Destruction of organics +
purification on ion exchange
Process Steps Chemicals in solution Ion exchangeResins
MnO4-
C2O42-
Cr, Fe oxalatesanionic species
Water, CO2
Ni2+, Mn2+, Co2+
Fixation on cationic IEX
Cr, Fe oxalatesFixation on
anionicIEX
27
Total activity removed for each cycle
28
Primary loop Decontamination factors
ComponentDose rate before
mSv/hDose rate after
mSv/hDF
HOT LEG 1.74 0.125 14
COLD LEG 1 1.58 0.16 10
COLD LEG 2 0.74 0.11 7
MAKE UP EJECTOR 4.40 1.50 3
PRIMARY PUMP 1 0.46 0.15 3
PRIMARY PUMP 2 0.49 0.13 4
PRESSURIZER 0.47 0.14 3.5
STEAM GENERATOR 0.905 0.05 16
! In some points, still some hot spots due to redeposition in dead zones
horizontal line of the pressurizer, dead zones in heat exchangers..
29
• Phase I : Preparatory phase manual closure of the reactor pressure
vessel maintenance of the components modifications to the circuits
• Phase II : Decontamination operation hot run 3 decontamination Cycles
• Phase III : Post decontamination operations evacuation of the liquid wastes evacuation of the solid wastes
The total dose amounted to only 159 man*mSvThe dose saving up to now is over 500 man*mSv
16.9 man*mSv
6.4 man*mSv
135.3 man*mSv
Radiological aspects
30
Main data and results
• Contaminated surface treated 1200 m2
• Primary system volume 15 m3
• Corrosion products removed 33 kg• Mean Crud layer removed 5 µm• IEX Waste volume produced 1.35 m3
• Final waste volume 8 m3
• Dose rate in primary system 0.08 mSv/h • Dose rate purification system 0.06 mSv/h • Mean Decontamination factor ~ 10• Collective Dose exposure 0.16 man.Sv
31
• Expected ... Smooth process, minor operational problems Careful and detailed preparation is a must Requires a reactor in full satisfactory conditions To be performed shortly after the operation Man-Sv savings for future dismantling justify the operation
• Unexpected ... More ion exchange resins needed and higher liquid waste
volume Pollution of the reactor pool during reactor opening due to
the presence of insoluble iron oxalate and loose crud: could be easily removed by the plant filtration
Internals of RPV remarkably clean facilitating inspection and dismantling and allowing to evacuate waste in a lower category LAW vs MAW
Lessons drawn from the operation …
32
Guidelines for selecting appropriate FSD
• Objectives in terms of Decontamination Factor• Type of material: Acidic solution is not appropriate for
carbon steel• Volume of secondary waste: preferred regenerative
process (Lomi, DfD, CORD…)• Composition of secondary waste: avoid organic element
like EDTA (Complexing agent)• Type of oxide layer: Select an oxidizing process for high
chromium content in the CRUD• Capability of treatment and conditioning of the
secondary waste generated (Evaporation, IEX, Precipitation, filtration…)
33
Decontamination Techniques Used in Decommissioning Activities
• Objectives and selection criteriaObjectives and selection criteria• Full system decontaminationFull system decontamination• Decontamination of components/parts
General considerations Chemical decontamination Electrochemical decontamination Mechanical decontamination Decontamination by melting Guidelines for selecting appropriate decontamination
techniques The case of BR3 (ZOE - MEDOC)
• ConclusionsConclusions
34
Decontamination of components/parts
• To reduce the contamination of components to such levels that they may be Disposed of at a lower category -
decategorization Recycled or reused in the conventional
industry (clearance of material)
• The decontamination can be applied: In a closed system on an isolated
component (circuits, steam generator…)
In an open system on dismantling material in batch treatment.
35
• Multi-step processesSame processes : Lomi, Cord,
Canderem
• Processes in one single step (Hard decontamination process)Cerium IV process : SODP,
REDOX, MEDOCHNO3/HF
HBF4 : Decoha, DfD..
Chemical decontamination
36
Cerium IV process
• The cerium IV process is a one step treatment.
• The cerium is a strong oxidizing agent (Eo = 1.61 V) in mixture with acid (Nitric acid or Sulfuric acid)
• The cerium IV dissolves oxide layer and the base metal.
• Cerium can be regenerated and recycled.• The neutralization of cerium IV and the
treatment of the solution for final conditioning are simple.
37
Cerium IV process
T (°C) Acid Regeneration
Origin Appli-cation
Speed
SODP Amb HNO3 O3 Sweden Closed loop
Low
REDOX 60-80°C HNO3 Electro-chemical
Japan Open system
High
MEDOC 80°C H2SO4 O3 Belgium Open and
closed loop
High
38
The MEDOC process has been selected for its high decontamination efficiency
Clearance of material
Objectives
MEDOC process at BR3
39
MEDOC : Only one step treatment
Regenerationof cerium IV
Ce 4+
Ce 3+
Cerium solutionO2
Ozonegas
ContaminatedMaterial
Free release
Decontamination
40
BR3 industrial plant is characterized by three stages
O3
O2
waste treatment
Decon.loop
Rinsingloop
1
2
3
41
Effluents are partially treated by SCK and transported to Belgoprocess
Waste
SCK-CEN Belgoprocess
Ph NeutralizationPrecipitationFiltration
15 kg/m3 total4 Gbq/m3
Cerium neutralizationNitric acid
10 T < 5 %
0.3 T
Asphalt
42
Medoc workshop after installation
43
Control room
44
Safety precautions taken in the MEDOC installation
Due to the combined radioactive and chemical hazards construction materials selected to resist to the aggressive
process unreacted ozone thermally destroyed before release O3 and H2 detectors with automatic actions on the process two independent ventilation systems
45
Material after decontamination
46
25 tons of contaminated material have already been treated
Treatment capacity is 0.5 ton per treatment (20 m2)
Average corrosion rate 2.5 µm/h
The treatment time is about 4 to 10 hours
Very low residual contamination < 0.1 Bq/g
Specific activity of material after decontamination in
200 Liters drums
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
47
Steam generator and pressurizer decontamination
in May 2002
Main goal Make the demonstration of large components decontamination using MEDOC Reach the clearance contamination level after melting
Steam generator characteristics (primary loop - SS)
30 tons of mixed stainless and carbon steel Number of tubes 1400 in stainless steel Total length of tubes 15 km Total surface 620 m2 Volume 2.7 m3
7,94
m
48
Handling of the SG before decontamination
The SG has been removed and placed horizontally
to allow the total filling up of the primary side
49
Main circulation loop between SG and MEDOC plant
T01
ROV 01
ROV 17HV 02
ROV 21
ROV 18
ROV 04
ROV 03
F01ROV 16
RO
V 2
2
T02
RO
V 0
5
ROV 19
ROV 13
P05P02
MS01
ROV 07
ROV 08
R01
ROV 09
FLT 01
RBS 82
RBS81
PCV 02
RBS 85
RBS 80
RBS83
Treatment gas Medoc
RBS 86 RBS 84RBS 87
Decontamination step I
MEDOC
50
Workload
30 decontamination cycles are needed :
Decontamination (2 hours)
Regeneration of cerium IV (4 hours)
After 15 cycles, the SG was rotated for homogenous attack on the primary side.
60 hours decontamination and 130 hours of regeneration about 3 weeks with 2 working teams.
51
• 10 µm or 42 kg of material were removed on the overall surface.
• 2.06 Gbq of Co60
• The tube bundle was manually rinsed via the primary head with pressurized water.
• Low radiation level in the primary head (few µSv/h) - no free contamination
Reach the clearance contamination level after melting
52
Conclusions on MEDOC
Contaminated materials are successfully decontaminated using a batchwise technique in MEDOC plant.
Up to now, 80% of treated materials have been cleared and sold to a scrap dealer (including primary pipes)
Remaining 20% can be cleared after melting (< 1 Bq/g) The loop treatment of the BR3-SG was also a success
It will easy the post-operation dismantling (HPWJC), It will avoid the evacuation of huge components in a
waste category.
53
HNO3/HF processes
• The sulfonitric mixture is commonly used for the etching of stainless steel
in batch process in pulverization solution
• The liquid penetrates the oxide layer to attack the base metal (thorough decontamination process).
• The oxides come off the surface and stay in the solution.
• The oxides are eliminated by filtration.
54
• The efficiency increases with the concentration and the temperature.
• However, it decreases with the increasing of dissolved material.
• This is not a regenerative process, new HF has to be added to the solution and produces more effluents.
HNO3/HF processes
55
• Application : Not very attractive in batch
treatment due to the consumption of reagent
Good result in pulverisation process at low temperature followed by rinsing with pressurised water jet.
HNO3/HF processes
• Safety Need of special attention to the
worker safety due to the presence of HF and fluoride.
56
HBF4 processes
• The fluororic acid is able to dissolve both the oxide layer and the base alloy on stainless or carbon steel
• This process is used in batch treatment or in pulverization process
• The fluoroboric acid can be regenerated by electrodeposition of the metal.
Decoha or DfD processes
57
Regeneration of HBF4
Cathode (-) Anode (+)
Ion
Exchange
Membrane
H+
Inlet solution
Outlet solution to filter
Metal Particles
Dissolution reaction (Decontamination)
Fe + 2 HBF4 Fe(BF4)2 + H2
Cathodics reactions
Fe(BF4)2 + 2e- Fe + 2 BF4 -
Anodic reaction
H2O 2 H+ + 2e- + ½ O2
Recombination after membrane transfer
2H+ + 2 BF4 - HBF4
2H+ + 2 e-- H2
58
Application
• Compared to the cerium or sulphonitric process, it is less aggressive (lower rate)
• Due to the formation of hydrogen in the decontamination and regeneration steps, the process required special safety attention (monitoring, ventilation, dilution with air…)
• The 137Cs which is not deposited has to be eliminated in IEX or by added chemical treatment.
59
Advantages for chemical decontamination
• Chemical decontamination allows the treatment of complex geometry material (hidden parts, inside parts of tubes,…)
• With strong mineral acids, DF over 104 can be reached allowing the clearance of material
• With proper selection of chemicals, almost all radionuclides may be removed
• Chemical decontamination is a known practice in many nuclear plants and facilities (experience…)
60
• The main disadvantage is the generation of secondary liquid waste which requires appropriate processes for final treatment and conditioning
• The safety due to the chemical hazard with high corrosive products (Acid, gas,…) and by-products (H2, HF, …)
• Chemical decontamination is mostly not effective on porous surfaces
Disadvantages for chemical decontamination
61
Electrochemical decontamination
• Electrolytic polishing is an anodic dissolution technique
• Material to be decontaminated is the anode, the cathode being an electrode or the tank itself
• Objectives : removed hot spot lowered dose rate decategorisation of material
62
+
-
chemical or
electrochemical
bath with acid or salt
Electrochemical decontamination
• Phosphoric acid• Nitric acid• Sulfuric acid• Sodium sulfate
Electrolyte
High current density at low voltage
63
Application
• Electropolishing can be used for the treatment of Carbon steel, Stainless steel, Aluminum
• Electropolishing requires conducting surfaces (the paint must be removed)
• Not really adapted for small or complex geometry material with hidden parts (current density inside pipes, …)
64
Special technique at KRB A plant in Gundremmingen
Decontamination of
stainless steel parts with
phosphoric acid
• quick processing time• reliability• less secondary waste• maximal recycling effect
Electropolishing
65
Principle of electropolishing
Oxide skin
Base material
before after
+
-
H2PO4
6000 A
at low voltage
chemical or
electrochemical
bath with phosphoric acid
66
Stainless Steel in Acid Bath
67
Stainless Steel after Electropolishing
68
Regeneration of Phosphoric Acid
• Recycling of Phosphoric acid by
• Reuse acid for decontamination
• Thermolysis of iron oxalat
- adding oxalic acid
- precipitate the dissolved iron as
- iron oxalate
- extracting the iron oxalate
- vaporization
- heating the iron oxalate
- transformation into iron oxide for final storage
69
Schematic principle of Regeneration
Dilute acid to concentrated
70
Thermolysis plant for iron oxalate
190°C
71
Example „Secondary Steam Generator“
Vessels of three Steam Generators
decontaminated from 20,000 Bq/cm²
to free release
producing only 1,5% radioactive waste
72
Electropolishing processes
Electro-lyte
Conc
M
Current density
A/m2
Elec-trode
Time
Hours
Corro-sion rateµm/h
AEA/ Harwell
HNO31 20-30 Ti 2 NC
CEA/UDIN
HNO32 100-300 Basket
Ti1-3 16 – 20
Toshiba H2SO40.5 3000 –
1000060°C
NC <1 60-240
EldeconABB/
Sweden
Na2SO40.5 1000-
6000NC <1 60
73
Advantages of Electropolishing
• Commercially available and relatively inexpensive
• Large panel of material and geometry (water box of SG, tanks, large pieces,…) can be treated with this technique
• High corrosion rate and quick treatment
• Low volume of secondary waste.
74
• Electropolishing does not remove fuels, sludge or any insulating material
• Inside parts of tubes or hidden parts are treated poorly
• Like chemical processes, secondary liquid waste are generated. This method is less applicable for industrial decontamination of complex geometries: limited by the size of the batch in immersion
process The access to contaminated parts and free space
are required when an electrode (pad) is used• Handling of components may lead to additional
exposure to workers
Disadvantages of Electropolishing
75
Mechanical decontamination
• Mechanical decontaminations are often less aggressive than the chemical ones but they are a bit simpler to use.
• Mechanical and chemical techniques are complementary to achieve good results
• The two basic disadvantages The contaminated surface needs to be accessible Many methods produce air bone dust.
76
Cleaning with ultrasons
Projection of CO2 ice or water ice
Pressurized water jet
Decontamination with abrasives in wet or dry environment
Mechanical action by grinding, polishing, brushing
Typical Mechanical decontamination
77
Cleaning with ultrasons
• The cleaning in ultrasonic batch is only applicable for slightly fixed contamination
• Does not allow to remove the fixed contamination
• This technique is used in combination with detergent (Decon 90, …)
• However, it is mainly used to enhance the corrosion effect in chemical decontamination processes (Medoc,…)
78
Projection of CO2 ice or water ice
• CO2 ice pellets are projected at high speed against the surface
• The CO2 pellets evaporate and remove the contamination
• The operator works in ventilated suit inside a ventilated room to remove CO2 and contamination
• Needs some decontamination tests before selecting the process (not efficient for deep contamination)
79
Pressurized water jet
• Low pressure water Jet : 50 – 150 bar Pre-decontamination technique Removal of sludge or deposited oxide Decontamination of tools
• Medium pressure water Jet : 150 – 700 bar Usually used for the decontamination of equipments or
large surfaces (pool walls,…) Large water consumption (60 – 6000 L/h) and
contaminated aerosols Requires a suitable ventilation system and a
recirculation loop with filtration (recycling of water)
80
Decontamination with abrasives
• Uses the power of abrasives projected at high speed against the surface Wet environment: fluid transporter is water Dry environment: fluid transporter is air
• Imperative to ensure the recycling of the abrasive to reduce the secondary waste production
• Needs a suitable ventilated system to remove contamination and aerosols.
81
Abrasives in wet environment at BR3
Roof opening for large piecesRoof opening for large pieces
Operator at workOperator at work
82
Abrasives in dry environment
• Decontamination (Metal, plastics, concrete…)
• Decoating• Cleaning• Degreasing
• Working in enclosed area
83
Abrasives in dry environment at Belgoprocess
• Automatic process in batch treatment
Declogging filter (ventilation)
Load of material
84
Comparison of the wet and dry sandblasting
• Choose an abrasive with a long lifetime (recycling) Minerals (magnetite, sand,…) Steel pellets, aluminum oxide Ceramic, glass beads Plastic pellets Natural products
• Wet and dry techniques allow to recycle the abrasive by separation Filtration or decantation in wet sandblasting On declogging filter (ventilation) in dry sandblasting
• The air contamination in dry sandblasting is much more important (cross contamination…)
85
Advantages/Disadvantages abrasive-blasting
• Advantages Effective and commercially available Removes tightly adherent material
(paint, oxide layer…)• Disadvantages
Produces a large amount of secondary waste (abrasive and dust…)
Care to introduce the contamination deeper in porous material.
86
Mechanical action by grinding, polishing, brushing
• Large range of abrasive belts or rollers available on the market
• Ideal to remove small contaminated surface• Due to the production of dust, used in a
ventilated enclosure, the operator wears protection clothes
87
Melting of metals
• The melting of metal can be considered as a decontamination technique 137Cs are eliminated in fumes and dust Heavy elements coming from oxide are
eliminated in slag (radioactive waste)• The melting technique is used for
The recycling of material in nuclear field (container,..)
The clearance of ingots after melting (measurement of activity easier …)
88
Melting of metals
Country Capacity Material Product
Carla Germany 3 t CS, SS, Al, Cu
Ingot, shield blocks,
containers
Studsvik Sweden 3 t CS, SS, Al
Ingot
89
Advantages of melting
• Advantages of redistributing of radionuclides in ingots/slag and dust: decontamination effect
• Essential step when releasing components with complex geometries (allows the measurement after melting)
90
Conclusions
• Selection criteria of decontamination techniques for metals The geometry and size of pieces The objectives of the decontamination (dose
rate or waste management…) The nature and the level of contamination The state of the surface and the type of
material The availability of the process
91
Needs for decommissioning
• For decommissioning we need several complementary techniques To reduce the dose rate before dismantling
FSD To treat materials with complex geometries
Chemical decontamination To treat materials with simple geometries
Sand blasting or electrochemical decontamination To decontaminate tools or slightly contaminated
pieces High pressure jet Manuel cleaning Other mechanical techniques
To remove residual ‘hot spot’ after decontamination Mechanical techniques : grinding, brushing
To help in the evacuation route of materials Melting of metals