1 John Yates Director Facilities and Infrastructure Division June 2, 2009 Office of Science 2009...
-
Upload
aubrie-barker -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 John Yates Director Facilities and Infrastructure Division June 2, 2009 Office of Science 2009...
1
John Yates
Director
Facilities and Infrastructure Division
June 2, 2009
Office of Science2009 Facility
Update
2
Connect basic and applied sciences
Re-energize the national labs as centers of great science and innovation
Double the Office of Science budget
Embrace a degree of risk-taking in research
Create an effective mechanism to integrate national laboratory, university, and industry activities
Priority: Science and Discovery: Invest in science to achieve transformational discoveries
Science DiscoveryInnovation
Lower GHG emissions
Clean, Secure Energy
Economic Prosperity
National Security
New Administration!
New Administration!
3 Office of Science Funding Growing
3SC builds and operates some of the nation’s most
advanced R&D user facilities at its labs
Total FY 09 Funding $4.679 Billion
$14
$81
$145
$187
$369
$403
$512
$602
$796
$1,572
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800
Teacher & Scientist Development
Safeguards and Security
Science Laboratory Infrastructure
Program Direction
Advanced Scientific Computing
Fusion
Nuclear Physics
Biological and Environmental Research
High Energy Physics
Basic Energy Sciences
$ Millions
FY 10 New Initiatives:
46 Energy Frontier Research Centers - $100M
• 1,800 researchers and students• Universities, national labs, industry, and non-profits• 1/3 will be supported by Recovery Act funding
ARPA-E - $10M FY10; $400M ARRA
• Grants• Development of breakthrough energy technologies
FY 10 New Initiatives:
46 Energy Frontier Research Centers - $100M
• 1,800 researchers and students• Universities, national labs, industry, and non-profits• 1/3 will be supported by Recovery Act funding
ARPA-E - $10M FY10; $400M ARRA
• Grants• Development of breakthrough energy technologies
4
4
Status of Laboratory Infrastructure
Ten research laboratories with over 1,500 buildings and 20 million square feet of space.
Much of our infrastructure is old, expensive to
maintain, and can no longer meet the requirements of a modern research facility. RPV of $9B
Improvements have been made – increased annual maintenance investment, focus on reducing deferred maintenance.
An integrated approach is needed, including Capital Investment
SC funded Modernization Initiative Increased IGPP funded by labs
Elimination of Excess Facilities Maintenance
Typical Lab
Dust
No sprinklers
Rusty water
Improvised Cooling
Flammable insulation
Maintenance alone will not ensure our laboratoriescan continue to fulfill their missions.
5
5
Ten Year Site Plans Identify the F&I Gaps and Action Plans
The TYSP is integrated into Annual Laboratory Plans as a separate section
Provides normal TYSP information but also relates facilities to lab Core Capabilities and the investments needed to fill gaps
Outline:
Overview of Site Facilities and Infrastructure (½ page) Facilities and Infrastructure to Support Laboratory
Missions (3+ pages) Strategic Site Investments (3 pages) Trends and Metrics (1 page) Sustainability (1 page) Appendices: IFI Xcut
6
6
Mission Readiness Assessment Process Identifies Gaps and Investment Needs and Plans
Labs assess state of facilities and infrastructure, now and in the future.
• Not capable, Marginally Capable, Partially Capable, Capable
Capability gaps are identified, and translated into an action plan.
• Laboratory investments include IGPP, deferred maintenance reduction. funds, maintenance funds, and non-capitalized alterations.
• DOE investments include SLI line items, and programmatic GPP.
An evaluation of support facilities is also prepared.
Key Core Capability Objectives
Na Mb Pc Cd Laboratory DOE
Now
In 5 Years
In 10 YearsaN = Not bM = Marginal cP = Partial dC = Capable
Mission Ready, Assumes TYSP
Implemented
Key Buildings
Action PlanFacility and
Infrastructure Capability Gap
Core Capability 1
Core Capabilities
7
Gaps and Action Plans Also Developed for Support Facilities
Real Property CapabilityMission Ready
CurrentGap
Action Plan
Laboratory DOE
Asset – e.g., Post Office N M P C
N = Not M = Marginal P = Partial C = Capable N = Not M = Marginal P = Partial C = Capable
Buildings Buildings OSF
Work EnvironmentConference and Collaboration Space Utilities
Post Office Auditorium/Theater CommunicationsOffices Conference Rooms ElectricalCafeteria Collaboration Space WaterRecreational/Fitness Petroleum/OilChild Care Gases
Site Services User Accommodations Waste/Sewage Treatment
Library Visitor Housing Storm WaterMedical Visitor Center Chilled WaterExamination & Testing SteamMaintenance and Fabrication Flood ControlFire StationStorage Road & Grounds
Parking Roads & Sidewalks Grounds
Assumes TYSP ImplementedAssumes TYSP Implemented
8
8
Lab analysisof
MissionReadiness by Core Capabilities yields F&I capability gap
and Action/Investment Plan
Lab analysisof
MissionReadiness by Core Capabilities yields F&I capability gap
and Action/Investment Plan
DOE commitment to Line Items and Excess Facilities
DOE commitment to Line Items and Excess Facilities
Mission Readiness Assessment Process
Driven by Science – executed through budget and contract commitments Results
included in Annual Lab Plan/
TYSP
Resultsincluded in
Annual Lab Plan/ TYSP
Lab commitment to include
maintenance and IGPP
Lab commitment to include
maintenance and IGPP
Mission ready lab facilities support strategic objectives
Mission ready lab facilities support strategic objectives
SC determines overall SLI priorities
consistent with SC mission needs
SC determines overall SLI priorities
consistent with SC mission needs
9
9
We are Already Implementing the Mission Readiness Model
FY 2009 planning guidance aligned with mission readiness concept
Initiate SC laboratory implementation of Mission Readiness Assessment Process
Communicate: OECM, OMB, Congress
Implement FY 2009 facilities and infrastructure contract performance measures (FY 2009 PEMP)
Issue FY 2010 planning guidance based on feedback and lessons learned
Developed lab plans that include integration of science mission and infrastructure
Initiate implementation of Mission Readiness Assessment Process
Implement 4 peer reviews in FY 2009 (ORNL, PNNL, LBNL and BNL)
Complete remaining 6 labs by FY11 Develop lessons learned and
implement improvements Continue to ensure that FIMS is
populated with key data (Maintenance, RPV, Deferred maint)
DOE-SC SC Laboratories
Focus facilities and infrastructure metrics to match SC strategic goals
10
SC Modernization Initiative Includes more than 30 prospective projects at our 10 major
laboratories totaling over $2 billion.
Projects replace and rehab/renovate existing buildings and infrastructure
Completion is expected to take 10 years but will depend on budget availability for the ramp up to the needed annual funidng level of $200M a year.
When completed, the Initiative will have improved each laboratory’s ability to fully support the missions of the Office of Science
The initiative is will eliminate more than $200 million of deferred maintenance, construct nearly 2 million square feet of modern building space, eliminate over 1.5 million square feet of obsolete building space, and renovate more than 1 million square feet of space. (These are current estimates.)
11
11
Modernization Initiative Projects[Not Budget Quality Data]
TEC Estimate
($M)
TEC Estimate
($M)
Metals Development Replacement Building, Ames 46 Seismic Safety, Phase 3, LBNL 91
Energy Sciences Building, ANL 95 Seismic Safety of Building 70, LBNL 84
Modernize Multi-program Buildings, Phase I, ANL 101 Seismic Safety of Gen. Purpose Research Structures, LBNL 138
Multi-program Replacement Building 2, ANL 83 Modernization of Laboratory Facilities, ORNL 95
Site Infrastructure/Utility Modernization, ANL 54 Site Utility Modernization, ORNL 90
Multi-program Replacement Building 3, ANL 92 Site Operations Facility, ORNL 39
Modernize Multi-program Buildings, Phase 2, ANL 76 Melton Valley Research Ops Support Facility, ORNL 28
Interdisciplinary Science Building, Phase I, BNL 66 Site Maintenance/Fabrication Facility, ORNL 51
Renovate Science Labs, Phase 2, BNL 50 Waste Handling Systems, ORNL 56
Interdisciplinary Science Building, Phase 2, BNL 70 System Development Laboratory, PNNL 99
Support Shops Complex, BNL 43 Science and Technology Support Infrastructure, PPPL 40
Utilities Improvement Project, BNL 38 Critical Utility Infrastructure System Upgrade/Mod, PPPL 15
Central Computer Building, BNL 27 Research Support Building and Inf Modernization, SLAC 96
Renovate Science Labs, Phase 3, BNL 55 Storm Water Treatment System, SLAC 19
Industrial Cooling Water System, FNAL 21 Technology and Engineering Development Facility, TJNAF 72
High Voltage Electrical System Upgrade, FNAL 14 CEBAF Center Addition/Upgrade, TJNAF 61
Industrial Facilities Consolidation, FNAL 34 Utilities Improvement Project, TJNAF 29.2
Seismic Safety, Phase 2, LBNL 95 Total 2.2B
12
Expected Impact of SC Infrastructure Modernization Initiative on Condition
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
$ M
illio
ns
0.930
0.940
0.950
0.960
0.970
0.980
0.990
AC
I
Investment - Lab PlanDMACI
13
Ongoing Projects in the Initiative
Modernization of Laboratory Facilities, ORNL
TPC: $96.3MConstruction of a new chemical sciences, materials scienceand technology core capabilities laboratory that will allowresearchers to move from the 4500 Complex. Constructionstart currently forecasted in 4Q FY 2009.
Interdisciplinary Science Building, Ph I, BNL
TPC: $61.8M - $66.8MDemolition of inadequate facilities and construction ofa new building with state-of-the-art laboratories,associated offices and support space.
Technology and Engineering Development Facility, TJNAF
TPC: $67M - $73.2MRenovation of the Test Lab Building and construction of new space thatwill eliminate severe overcrowding and improve workflow andproductivity. Also eliminates inadequate work space in and near the TestLab.
*Baseline has not yet been established.*Baseline has not yet been established.
On-goingOn-going On-going
On-going
On-goingOn-going
14
14
Ongoing Projects in the Initiative (continued)
Building 74 (Life Sciences)
Building 85 (Hazardous Waste Handling Facility)
Seismic Life-Safety & Modernization ofGeneral Purpose Buildings Ph 2, LBNL
TPC: $94.38M - $97.08MReplacement of seismically “very poor” and “poor”facilities with a new laboratory/office building, upgradeof the Hazardous Waste Handling Facility, andmodernization of another laboratory/office building(Bldg 74, Life Sciences).
*Baseline has not yet been established.*Baseline has not yet been established.
Rendering of new General Purpose Laboratory
On-goingOn-going
15
Projects in the FY 2010 Budget Request Research Support Building and Infrastructure
Modernization, SLACPreliminary TPC Range: $81M - $97.4M
This project will integrate the lab’s Accelerator Physics community acrossprogrammatic boundaries, and will provide more uniform service(training, ES&H, business services) for the lab-wide user community. Project scope includes the construction of a modern office building for technical staff currently dispersed throughout the site in aged trailers andother inefficient locations and modernization of three facilities foroperations staff supporting the research mission.
Energy Sciences Building, ANLPreliminary TPC Range: $85.5M - $96M
Scope includes construction of a new multidisciplinary EnergySciences Building that will provide efficient and modern researchspace that will provide the interdisciplinary science platformneeded to discover and develop alternative approaches toenergy production, storage and utilization.
Renovate Science Labs 2, BNLPreliminary TPC Range: $45.8M - $50.8M
This project will upgrade and rehabilitate obsoletesystems in Buildings 510 (Physics) and 555 (Chemistry). Although the basic core and shellconstruction of these buildings is sound, the laband office spaces, and their utilities andenvironmental support systems are obsolete.
15
16
Meeting the 15% Sustainability Target for Existing Buildings* (Data in GSF)
No Data Yet, 9,458
Existing Buildings Not Assessed,
13,479,501
Not Worth Assessing, 6,317,404
Assessed & Do Not Meet GP, 1,083,634
Exempted from Assessment,
2,691,758 Assessed & Meet GP, 866,178
GP = Guiding Principles
Total SC GSF*: 24,447,000 gsf Total Non-Exempt: 21,756,000 gsfSustainability Index: 3.98%Sustainability Target: 15% by FY15 _________*Includes leased space
(FIMS Data as of 5-21-09)
17
Summary
The Office of Science is integrating infrastructure management with the SC mission.
The Mission Readiness Assessment Process ties investments to SC’s missions and is fully integrated with Annual Lab Planning.
The Infrastructure Modernization Initiative will improve condition and mission readiness of the SC labs.
We are on track to meet the Sustainability Goals.
End result: Modern, safe, and environmentally-friendly infrastructure that allows the laboratories to pursue transformational discoveries.
18
Question Time
John YatesDirector, Facility & Infrastructure DivisionOffice of Safety, Security & Infrastructure Office of ScienceDepartment of Energy 301-903-8435fax: 301-903-8442E-mail: [email protected]
Contact Info:
For More Information:For More Information:
Office of Safety, Security and Infrastructure Home Page: http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-31/
Infrastructure Modernization Initiative Home Page: http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-31/inf_mod.shtml
Mission Readiness Home page: http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-31/infrastructure/Mission_Readiness.html
Office of Safety, Security and Infrastructure Home Page: http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-31/
Infrastructure Modernization Initiative Home Page: http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-31/inf_mod.shtml
Mission Readiness Home page: http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-31/infrastructure/Mission_Readiness.html