1 issues and priorities rli final
-
Upload
indonesia-infrastructure-initiative -
Category
Business
-
view
87 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 issues and priorities rli final
![Page 1: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Improving Bus Services in Jakarta: Issues and Priorities Richard Iles
![Page 2: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Focus of TransJakarta Improvement Program Sub-Activity B
• Assistance to Dishub in improving bus services in Jakarta, excluding BRT services operated by TransJakarta– this is the focus of Sub-Activity A
• Sub-Activity B complements Sub-Activity A and focuses mainly on:– large buses (but not BRT)– medium-sized buses– angkots or mikrolets
• But there are some areas of commonality including– ticketing– information– integration and complementarity with BRT and other modes (MRT,
taxis, bajajs, ojeks)• This workshop is concerned mainly with non-BRT buses, but
some topics will cover the broader public transport spectrum
![Page 3: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The Scale of the Problem
• In 2002 there were 37 million person trips per day in Greater Jakarta : 40% of all trips were on foot or by non-motorised means and of the 60% of motorised trips:
50% were by bus, minibus, etc 25% were by car, taxi, etc 25% were by motor-cycle
By 2011/12 it was evident that: Total number of trips had increased substantially Number of car & m/cycle trips had increased dramatically –
especially motor-cycles Number of bus trips had remained constant
![Page 4: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Growth in Registered Vehicles in Jakarta 1975-2008
![Page 5: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Mode Change – 2002-2010• Significant growth in motor-cycle use• Corresponding decline in % bus usage• The figures for GREATER Jakarta are:
![Page 6: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Growth in Passenger Movement(Greater Jakarta - 2002-2012)
![Page 7: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Key statistics
![Page 8: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Total Person Trips within DKI Jakarta
Within DKI Cross Border
Total
Public Transport
4,823,00026%
1,724,00024%
6,547,00025%
Motor Cycle 9,613,00051%
3,490,00049%
13,103,00051%
Car 4,338,00023%
1,861,00026%
6,199,00024%
Total 18,775,000 7,075,000 25,850,000
• in 2012, there were almost 26 million person trips per day with DKI Jakarta area (including cross-border)• Approximately half were by motorcycle, with a further 25%
each by PT and car
![Page 9: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
![Page 10: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Public Transport – Passenger Numbers
• There were around 4.8 million daily public transport trips in DKI Jakarta in 2012• Of these, the BRT system carried 350,000 passengers – or
around 7% of the total• The remaining 4.4 million trips used the other PT services
– including large buses, medium buses, angkots, mikrolets, taxis, bajas & ojeks
![Page 11: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Deficiencies of the Existing non-BRT Bus System• Poor travelling conditions• Inconvenient services• Poor safety standards• Contribution to congestion and pollution– real or perceived
• Lack of information• Difficult to regulate• Unsustainable without substantial changes
![Page 12: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Public Transport as an Alternative to Private Transport
• A stated Government objective• PT must be attractive to car users and motorcyclists– simply providing a service will not ensure that it will be used
•Must be easy to understand•Must be convenient– easily accessible– seamless transfers
•Must be reliable•Must be quick– total journey times comparable with car/motorcycle
• Comfort standard must be acceptable• Restriction of private transport use– most car users will be reluctant to use PT, however good the
service
![Page 13: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Key Issues and Priorities
• Need for a coherent policy for public transport• Reform of bus industry • Rationalisation of bus fleet • Rationalisation of route network• Coordination/integration of services and modes• Infrastructure development• Fares– levels – structure
• Ticketing• Information• Enforcement
![Page 14: 1 issues and priorities rli final](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110119/555c91a9d8b42a6f778b4a5f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Dishub’s Role
• Planning an adequate public transport system• Securing delivery of all planned services • Ensuring compliance with standards• IndII can help