1 Inter Agency Board Meeting San Antonio, TX February 29, 2012.
-
Upload
karin-kennedy -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of 1 Inter Agency Board Meeting San Antonio, TX February 29, 2012.
1
Inter Agency Board MeetingSan Antonio, TX
February 29, 2012
Discussion Points
PPD-8 – National Preparedness
FY 2012 – A Year of Transition
Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative
FY 2013 – What’s Next
3
PPD-8 National Preparedness Aimed at “strengthening the security and resilience” of the U.S. through “systematic
preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation”
An evolutionary step from current HSPD-8 methods
Signed March 30, 2011; replaces HSPD-8 and Annex 1
PPD Implementation Plan delivered on May 27, 2011; approved by the President for release on July 8, 2011
A Linking together of the national efforts, organized around key elements
the ends we wish to achieve (the National Preparedness Goal – Completed)
the means to achieve it (the National Preparedness System – Completed)
the delivery; how we use what we build (National Frameworks – Due 6/30/2012; Federal Interagency Operational Plans – Due 9/25/2012)
the reporting of our progress (Annual National Preparedness Report – Due 3/30/2012 and annually thereafter)
the sustained engagement (Build and Sustain Preparedness - Ongoing)
4
PPD-8 Key Principles Employ an all-of-Nation/whole community approach, integrating efforts across
federal, state, local, tribal and territorial governments and with private sector, community, non-governmental, and individual partners
Use a risk-based approach to support preparedness
Build core capabilities to confront any challenge
Integrate efforts across Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery
Assess performance outcomes to measure and track progress
5
Defined by the capability target measures of the core capabilities within the mission areas of prevent, protect,
mitigate, respond, and recover
The National Preparedness Goal
A secure and resilient Nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover
from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.
6
Core capabilities: Distinct highly interdependent elements necessary for our success Capability targets: Performance threshold(s) for each core capability that will guide our allocation of resources to
support national preparedness Emphasis on whole community: Whole community includes all members of society, including individuals, communities, the private
and nonprofit sectors, faith-based organizations, and Federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments
The Goal seeks to enable the whole community to contribute to and benefit from national preparedness
Strategic National Risk Assessment: In accordance with PPD-8, a Strategic National Risk Assessment was conducted The SNRA identified a wide range of threats and hazards that pose a significant risk to the nation,
affirming the need for an all-hazards, capability-based approach to preparedness planning
National Preparedness Goal Supporting Components
7
Critical Transportation
Fatality Management Services
Interdiction and Disruption
Mass Search and Rescue Operations
Public and Private Services and Resources
Mass Care Services
Planning
Public Health and Medical Services
Infrastructure Systems
Operational Communications
On-Scene Security and Protection
Situational Assessment
Health and Social Services
Environmental Response / Health and Safety
Planning
Forensics and Attribution
Interdiction and Disruption
Intelligence and Information Sharing
Access Control and Identity Verification
Screening, Search and Detection
Planning
PREVENT PROTECT RESPOND RECOVER
Economic Recovery
Housing
Community Resilience
Long-Term Vulnerability Reduction
Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment
Threats and Hazard Identification
MITIGATE
Infrastructure Systems
Natural and Cultural Resources
Intelligence and Information Sharing
Operational Coordination
Physical Protective Measures
Cybersecurity
Operational Coordination
Public Information and Warning
Public Information and Warning
Public Information and Warning
Public Information and Warning
Public Information and Warning
Operational Coordination
Operational Coordination
Operational Coordination
Planning
Risk Management for Protection Programs
and Activities
Planning
Screening, Search and Detection
Supply Chain Integrity and Security
Core Capabilities List
8
The National Preparedness System (NPS) description is comprised of six major components
Identifying and Assessing Risk
Estimating Capability Requirements
Building and Sustaining Capabilities
Planning to Deliver Capabilities
Validating Capabilities
Reviewing and Updating
National Preparedness System Description Components
14
Comprised of four key elements…
A comprehensive campaign to build and sustain national preparedness, to include public outreach and community-based and private-sector programs to enhance national resilience
Federal preparedness
Federal preparedness assistance (i.e., grants and technical assistance)
National research and development efforts
Activities for the effort to Build and Sustain Preparedness will begin shortly
1 yr 2 yrs3 mo 6 mo 9 mo 15 mo 18 mo 21 mo
PPD-8 SignedMarch 30, 2011
Ongoing
Build and Sustain Preparedness
16
FY 2012 - Year of Transition
PL 112-74 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012
For grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other activities, $1,349,681,000, which shall be distributed, according to threat, vulnerability, and consequence, at the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security
$675 M for Fire Fighter Assistance Grants (AFG & SAFER)
$350 M for Emergency Management Performance Grants
17
FY11 & FY12 Funding Summary
Program FY 2011 FY 2012 Delta ($) Delta (%)Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) $662,622,100 $490,376,000 ($172,246,100) -26%Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG) $329,040,400 $339,500,000 $10,459,600 3%State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) $526,874,100 $294,000,000 ($232,874,100) -44%Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) $235,029,000 $97,500,000 ($137,529,000) -59%Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) $200,079,000 $87,500,000 ($112,579,000) -56%Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) $54,890,000 $46,600,000 ($8,290,000) -15%Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak) $22,214,456 $10,000,000 ($12,214,456) -55%Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP) $10,000,000 $6,000,000 ($4,000,000) -40%UASI Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) $18,962,000 $10,000,000 ($8,962,000) -47%Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) $34,929,932 $0 ($34,929,932) -100%Citizen Corps Program (CCP) $9,980,000 $0 ($9,980,000) -100%Driver’s License Security Grant Program (DLSGP) $45,188,000 $0 ($45,188,000) -100%Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant Program $14,601,740 $0 ($14,601,740) -100%Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP)
$14,101,736 $0 ($14,101,736) -100%
Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP) $7,745,544 $0 ($7,745,544) -100%Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP) $4,990,000 $0 ($4,990,000) -100%Total $2,191,248,008 $1,381,476,000 ($809,772,008) -36.95%
For Internal Use Only
18
FY 2012 – What’s New
Alignment to National Preparedness Goal
Program by Mission Area
Core Capabilities supported by program
Program Priorities
Sustainment of core capabilities at state/territory/regional/local/tribal level that can be considered national assets and deployable via intra and inter state mutual aid
Emphasis on sustainment lifecycle (updated plans, refresher training and exercises, equipment maintenance and updates)
19
FY 2012 – What’s New
Program Priorities – Cont’d
Mutual Aid agreements and EMAC membership (for states and territories) a requirement
Building out new capabilities only when other core capabilities have been sustained
Risk assessments drive prioritization of new capabilities
FY 2011 performance measures carried into FY 2012
24 month period of performance
20
Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative $8.3 Billion in unexpended grant funds from FY 2007 to FY 2011
Secretary’s Guidance to SAAs issued on February 13
Info Bulletin #379 issued by FEMA on February 17 implementing Secretary’s Guidance
Expanded allowability to maximum permitted by 9/11 Act
Streamlined waiver process
Stricter period of performance extension criteria
21
FY 2013 – What’s Coming
FY 2013 Budget includes $2.9 billion in grant dollars
Consolidates 16 other grants into the new, streamlined National Preparedness Grant Program (NPGP)
Competitive, risk-based model
Funding allocations based on prioritized core capabilities as well as comprehensive threat/risk assessments and gap analyses
Each state and territory will receive a base level of funding allocated in accordance with a population driven formula
22
FY 2013 – What’s Coming
Remainder of grant allocations determined competitively, based on criticality of specific capability according to regional threat/risk assessments and applicant’s ability to complete the project within two year period of performance
NPGP will focus on:
developing and sustaining core capabilities
enhancing terrorism prevention and protection capabilities
critical infrastructure/ key resource protection
24
Contact Information
C. Gary Rogers
Senior Policy Advisor
Grant Programs Directorate
DHS/FEMA
202-786-9769
2525